Modification of skin incision for Baha Attract System Implantations.

<b><br>Introduction:</b> In an era of wide accessibility to various systems for hearing impairment prosthetics, there exists a broad spectrum of surgical techniques facilitating system implantation.</br> <b><br>Aim:</b> The aim of the study is to present the technique of vertical incision in the implantation of the Baha Attract magnetic system as an alternative incision, maintaining a compromise between optimizing the surgical procedure and preserving the functionality and quality of life of the patient.</br> <b><br>Materials and methods:</b> The vertical incision technique is presented based on 5 patients treated between December 2022 and March 2023 diagnosed with conductive or mixed hearing loss.</br> <b><br>Results:</b> There were no adverse consequences or complications resulting from the performed surgical incision. All patients experienced uncomplicated healing. Patients are using sound processor magnets ranging from 4-5 in strength and Baha 6 Max sound processors weighing 11.5 g.</br> <b><br>Conclusions:</b> The vertical incision technique serves as an alternative to the C-shaped perimeter incision, allowing for the optimization and standardization of the surgical procedure, resulting in a smooth scar formation and maintaining good audiological and aesthetic outcomes.</br>.

Complications of Transcutaneous Protheses - A Systematic Review of Publications Over the Past 10 Years

Abstract Introduction Bone conduction implants, responsible for transmitting sound from an external processor to the inner ear, can be divided into active and passive, depending on the vibratory stimulus location. The use of transcutaneous device has increased, given its aesthetic appeal, the complications and limitations of percutaneous devices, and patient's treatment adherence, focusing mainly on efficacy. However, various complications are associated with the use of transcutaneous prosthesis, which can often be serious. Objective To approach the literature on complications involving transcutaneous bone-anchored prostheses through a systematic review of articles published in the past 10 years (2011-2021). Data Synthesis The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. All articles written in English reporting on currently available transcutaneous prosthesis implantation and its complications were selected. Studies on both children and adults were included. The data on complications were extracted, and complications were classified as minor or major and associated to each device used. Thirty-seven articles were included in the study, of which 14 were prospective cohort studies, 22 were retrospective case series, and 1 was a case report. Most studies (18) included both adults and children. Moreover, 901 implantations were performed, of which 552 implanted Baha Attract (Cochlear Ltd., Sydney, Australia), 244 implanted BoneBridge (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria), and 105 implanted Sophono (Sophono Inc., Boulder, CO, USA]). Furthermore, 192 adverse events were reported (total complication rate, 21.3%), with 161 minor complications (84.3%) and 31 major complications (16.1%). Conclusion Transcutaneous prosthesis is an audiological alternative with fewer complications than percutaneous prosthesis. However, its indication should be judicious because complications are common, and although most complications are minor, serious infections requiring explantation may develop.

Complications of Transcutaneous Protheses - A Systematic Review of Publications Over the Past 10 Years.

Introduction Bone conduction implants, responsible for transmitting sound from an external processor to the inner ear, can be divided into active and passive, depending on the vibratory stimulus location. The use of transcutaneous device has increased, given its aesthetic appeal, the complications and limitations of percutaneous devices, and patient's treatment adherence, focusing mainly on efficacy. However, various complications are associated with the use of transcutaneous prosthesis, which can often be serious. Objective To approach the literature on complications involving transcutaneous bone-anchored prostheses through a systematic review of articles published in the past 10 years (2011-2021). Data Synthesis The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. All articles written in English reporting on currently available transcutaneous prosthesis implantation and its complications were selected. Studies on both children and adults were included. The data on complications were extracted, and complications were classified as minor or major and associated to each device used. Thirty-seven articles were included in the study, of which 14 were prospective cohort studies, 22 were retrospective case series, and 1 was a case report. Most studies (18) included both adults and children. Moreover, 901 implantations were performed, of which 552 implanted Baha Attract (Cochlear Ltd., Sydney, Australia), 244 implanted BoneBridge (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria), and 105 implanted Sophono (Sophono Inc., Boulder, CO, USA]). Furthermore, 192 adverse events were reported (total complication rate, 21.3%), with 161 minor complications (84.3%) and 31 major complications (16.1%). Conclusion Transcutaneous prosthesis is an audiological alternative with fewer complications than percutaneous prosthesis. However, its indication should be judicious because complications are common, and although most complications are minor, serious infections requiring explantation may develop.

The evaluation of a surgery and the short-term benefits of a new active bone conduction hearing implant - the Osia® / Avaliação da cirurgia e os benefícios a curto prazo de um novo implante auditivo de condução óssea ativa - o sistema Osia®,

Abstract Introduction Modern medicine offers a wide spectrum of different hearing devices, and bone conduction implants can be found among them. Objective The presentation of the outcomes of the implantation of a new active bone conduction hearing implant - the Osia®, and its comparison with the well-known passive transcutaneous system - the Baha® Attract. Methods Eight adult patients with bilateral mixed hearing loss were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 was implanted with the Osia®, and group 2 was implanted with the Baha® Attract. The details of the surgery were analyzed, along with the functional and audiological results. Results In all the cases, the surgery was successful, and the healing uneventful. In both groups, it was observed that pure tone audiometry and speech audiometry in free field improved significantly after the implantation (mean gain in pure tone audiometry for the Osia group 42.8 dB SPL and for the Baha group 38.8 dB SPL). In the Osia group, the results after the surgery were much better than with the Baha® 5 Power processor on the Softband. The patients implanted with the Osia® evaluated the quality of their hearing as being superior to those implanted with the Baha® Attract. There was an evident improvement in the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit questionnaire and in the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale for both systems. In the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit, changes were more evident in the Osia group (in global score 49% vs. 37.2%). Conclusion Implantation of the Osia® is an effective treatment option for the patients with bilateral mixed hearing loss. The surgery is safe but more complex and time-consuming than the Baha® Attract implantation. The preliminary audiological results as well as the overall quality of life indicate that the Osia® is a better solution than the Baha® Attract. However, future studies should be carried out to make further observations in a larger group of patients, and with longer follow-up.

Resumo Introdução A medicina moderna oferece um amplo espectro de diferentes aparelhos auditivos, e implantes de condução óssea estão entre eles. Objetivo Apresentação dos resultados do uso de um novo implante auditivo de condução óssea ativa - o Osia® e sua comparação com o conhecido sistema transcutâneo passivo - o sistema Baha® Attract. Método Oito pacientes adultos com perda auditiva mista bilateral foram divididos aleatoriamente em dois grupos. O grupo 1 foi implantado com o Osia® e o grupo 2 foi implantado com o sistema Baha® Attract. Os detalhes da cirurgia foram analisados, juntamente com os resultados funcionais e audiológicos. Resultados Em todos os casos, a cirurgia foi bem-sucedida e a cicatrização ocorreu sem intercorrências. Nos dois grupos, observou-se que a audiometria de tons puros e a audiometria de fala em campo livre melhoraram significativamente após o implante (ganho médio na audiometria para tons puros para o grupo Osia® de 42,8 dB NPS e para o grupo Baha®, 38,8 dB NPS). No grupo Osia®, os resultados após a cirurgia foram muito melhores do que com o processador Baha® 5 Power no sistema SoftBand. Os pacientes implantados com o Osia® avaliaram melhor a qualidade de sua audição do que os implantados com o sistema Baha® Attract. Houve uma melhoria evidente no questionário abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit e na escala speech, spatial and qualities of hearing, para ambos os sistemas. No questionario abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit, as mudanças foram mais evidentes no grupo Osia® (escore global 49% vs. 37,2%). Conclusão O sistema Osia® é uma opção de tratamento eficaz para pacientes com perda auditiva mista bilateral. A cirurgia é segura, mas mais complexa e demorada que a implantação do sistema Baha® Attract. Os resultados audiológicos preliminares, bem como aqueles avaliando a qualidade de vida, indicam que o Osia® é uma alternativa melhor que o Baha® Attract. Entretanto, mais observações são necessárias em grupos maiores de pacientes e com tempo de seguimento mais longo.

The evaluation of a surgery and the short-term benefits of a new active bone conduction hearing implant - the Osia®.

INTRODUCTION: Modern medicine offers a wide spectrum of different hearing devices, and bone conduction implants can be found among them. OBJECTIVE: The presentation of the outcomes of the implantation of a new active bone conduction hearing implant - the Osia®, and its comparison with the well-known passive transcutaneous system - the Baha® Attract. METHODS: Eight adult patients with bilateral mixed hearing loss were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 was implanted with the Osia®, and group 2 was implanted with the Baha® Attract. The details of the surgery were analyzed, along with the functional and audiological results. RESULTS: In all the cases, the surgery was successful, and the healing uneventful. In both groups, it was observed that pure tone audiometry and speech audiometry in free field improved significantly after the implantation (mean gain in pure tone audiometry for the Osia group 42.8 dB SPL and for the Baha group 38.8 dB SPL). In the Osia group, the results after the surgery were much better than with the Baha® 5 Power processor on the Softband. The patients implanted with the Osia® evaluated the quality of their hearing as being superior to those implanted with the Baha® Attract. There was an evident improvement in the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit questionnaire and in the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale for both systems. In the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit, changes were more evident in the Osia group (in global score 49% vs. 37.2%). CONCLUSION: Implantation of the Osia® is an effective treatment option for the patients with bilateral mixed hearing loss. The surgery is safe but more complex and time-consuming than the Baha® Attract implantation. The preliminary audiological results as well as the overall quality of life indicate that the Osia® is a better solution than the Baha® Attract. However, future studies should be carried out to make further observations in a larger group of patients, and with longer follow-up.

Audiological benefits and performance improvements of Baha® attract implantation in patients with unilateral hearing loss.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the overall functional and audiological benefits in unilateral hearing loss, as well as performance improvements with Cochlear™ Baha® Attract System with Baha® 5 sound processor. METHODS: We performed a prospective study. Fourteen consecutive adult patients with unilateral hearing loss who were audiologically eligible for Baha® Attract were included in this study. All patients were followed-up, and a series of tests were performed in the sound field before surgery, one, two, three, and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Patients were categorized based on their hearing impairment type and severity. Ten patients had conductive hearing loss (CHL), or mixed hearing loss (MHL), and four patients had sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). The hearing threshold in the sound field aided with Baha® Attract was similar to the preoperative bone conduction hearing threshold of the better ear. The results of the speech audiometry improved post-operatively, but they did not match that of the better ear before surgery. The overall score of the hearing-in-noise test was gradually improved from one month to 6 months after surgery. The results of the sound localization test for SNHL patients were not as good as those for CHL or MHL. All the questionnaires demonstrated additional benefits that implied performance improvements. CONCLUSIONS: The Baha® Attract provides enough auditory benefits and performance improvements for hearing impaired patients, though there are different benefits according to the type of hearing loss. Clinicians need to counsel the unilateral hearing loss patients for Baha® Attract System carefully, according to their type of hearing loss.

Outcomes of BAHA connect vs BAHA attract in pediatric patients.

INTRODUCTION: Two of the most commonly employed bone-anchored hearing implant (BAHI) systems are the BAHA Connect and BAHA Attract. The BAHA Connect uses a skin-penetrating titanium abutment. The BAHA Attract uses an implanted magnet, leaving the overlying skin intact. Limited data is available on the difference in complication rates between the two systems. Our hypothesis was that there would be no difference in complications and audiologic data. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed of patients who had BAHA Connect vs. Attract at our tertiary care pediatric hospital from 2006 to 2018. Pre- and post-operative information, including demographics, related diagnoses, outcomes and complications were compared between the systems using Mann-Whitney U tests and Firth logistic regression for one year post-implant. Audiology data was analyzed with Wilcoxon rank-sum and Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank tests. RESULTS: Twenty-four Attract and 18 Connect BAHA surgeries were identified from 37 patients. Eleven Connect patients had the surgery completed in two stages. Connect patients followed up an average of 6.5 years post-implant and 15 months for Attract. A total of 58.8% of patients with Connect surgeries had complications within a year and 82.4% had a complication by their last follow-up. Aside from magnet strength related issues, there were no major complications with Attract surgery at any time point. Patients with Connect surgeries had significantly more skin overgrowths, cultured infections, times on antibiotics, nursing phone calls, and ENT visits within the first year and for all records, p < .05. The pure-tone average was significantly lower for both Connect [unaided-M(SD) = 61.7(9.8); aided-M(SD) = 26.4(5.5) and Attract (unaided-M(SD) = 66.0(22.5); aided-M(SD) = 25.6(6.1)] after implant, p < .001. CONCLUSION: Implantation of both systems lead to improved hearing outcomes with profoundly different complication rates.

Baha Attract Implantation Using a Small Incision: Initial Report of Surgical Technique and Surveillance.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the appropriate anatomical borders of implantation on the temporal bone in a cadaver study, and to develop a simplified surgical technique for Baha Attract implantation through a small incision along the hairline using anatomical evidence and a navigation system. METHODS: In a cadaver study, 20 human adult dry skulls were used to find flat areas of the temporal bone for Baha Attract magnet implantation. Four borders of the "optimal surgical site" were defined: Asterion line, occipitomastoid suture line, sigmoid sinus line, and digastric groove line. In three patients, we implanted the Baha Attract according to the newly developed surgical procedure and validated the feasibility of this technique with a navigation system. RESULTS: We identified the appropriate position of the implant on the temporal bone, suggesting a simplified surgical technique for Baha Attract with a small incision. We determined the spot of implantation, and the implants were inserted through a small surgical incision (<2.5 cm) under local anesthesia; the procedure lasted approximately 30 minutes. CONCLUSION: The optimal surgical site of the temporal bone is a safe and easily accessible location for implantation of the Baha Attract.

M.ALSHEIKH Technique: Modification to the Soft Tissue Reduction in the Baha® Attract Surgery.

To describe a modification to the Baha® Attract surgical technique that aims to enhance skin closure, create smooth skin across the surface of the wound, reduce surgery time, and improve cosmetics of the surgical site. Retrospective chart review. Patients were implanted between 2014 and 2016 at King Fahad General Hospital (KFGH) (Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia). 20 adult patients (11 males, 9 females), all eligible for Baha® Attract system. One patient only had a previous Baha® surgery. The normal Baha® Attract surgical technique with modification to the soft tissue reduction stage is described. The mean surgical time was 35.25 min (range 25-55). Bleeding was present but not significant and easily controlled in four patients. All patients received the 4 mm implant. None of the patients experienced severe pain. The postoperative follow-up period was 6 months for 7 patients and 8 months for 13 patients. Patient feedback and monitoring indicates a good hearing performance and comfort in all patients. The modified Baha® Attract surgical method causes less postoperative complication, improve cosmetic effect, and provide shorter operative time compared to the conventional Attract procedure.

Osseointegrated Auditory Devices-Transcutaneous: Sophono and Baha Attract.

Percutaneous osseointegrated bone conduction auditory devices provide excellent auditory rehabilitation. Device-related complications relate to skin abutment interface and cosmetic concerns, resulting in the development of transcutaneous devices. The Sophono and Baha Attract are safe and considered cosmetically superior to the percutaneous Baha Connect and Ponto. They provide excellent auditory enhancement; however, owing to indirect connectivity between processor and implant, there is on average 5- to 7-db less gain when compared with percutaneous bone-anchored implants. Surgical implantation of either device is usually performed under monitored sedation, in an ambulatory setting, with less than a 1-hour operative time, and minimal complications.

Outcomes of the Baha Attract System combined with auricle reconstruction in mandarin speaking patients with bilateral microtia-atresia.

BACKGROUND: A transcutaneous bone-conduction hearing device (tBCHD), the Baha Attract System has been recently introduced to China, and very few studies have assessed the efficacy of this system in speakers of mandarin. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to analyze the functional and cosmetic outcomes of this system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included 11 patients (nine males, two females), of mean age 16 years (range 9-32 years). Seven patients were conducted the implantation simultaneously with auricle reconstruction, and the other four were before it. Auditory results were compared between unaided patients and implanted patients. Subjective satisfaction was analyzed using three questionnaires. RESULTS: The mean sound field thresholds were 65.9 ± 5.1 dB SPL unaided and 30.9 ± 4.7 dB SPL with an implanted Baha Attract System, resulting in a mean hearing gain of 35.0 ± 6.7 dB. The mean WRS scores were 47.8 ± 8.7% unaided and 92.1 ± 2.0% with the Baha Attract System, resulting in a mean improvement of 47.8 ± 8.7%. No adverse events were reported and questionnaires showed good patients satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The transcutaneous Baha Attract System is effective in mandarin speaking patients, and the combination of hearing rehabilitation and auricle reconstruction surgery is promising for patients with bilateral microtia-atresia.

Transcutaneous Baha Attract system: Long-term outcomes of the French multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Bone conduction implants based on abutment-driven acoustic transmission result in good hearing outcomes; however, skin complications impact the quality of life (QOL) and possibly the viability of the device for many patients. The transcutaneous magnetic Baha® Attract technology was developed with the goal of minimising skin complications. OBJECTIVES: To analyse surgical, auditory and QOL outcomes for patients implanted with the Baha® Attract. DESIGN: Prospective multicentre cohort study. SETTING: Four French tertiary referral centres. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-two patients implanted with the Baha® Attract, including 25 with conductive and mixed hearing loss and 7 with single-sided deafness. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative follow-up involved the visual analysis of soft tissue adaptation and sound processor magnet strength measurement. The audiometric outcomes were evaluated in quiet and noise, and the QOL was assessed using three different questionnaires. RESULTS: After 12 months of use, soft tissue was thinner, and mean magnet strength was significantly decreased (3.7-3.1, P < 0.05) relative to measures during surgery. The speech recognition threshold in quiet significantly improved compared to unaided situation (73-44 dB HL respectively, P < 0.001) as did functional gain in noise (+2.8). All QOL scores improved, and the APHAB questionnaire score correlated with the audiometric outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The Baha® Attract technology results in significant hearing gain and improves QOL. Skin complications were not observed, although surgeons, audiologists and patients should be aware of soft tissue evolution during the first postoperative year. The reversibility of this implant is a major advantage that allows switching to another system if hearing degrades.

A functional and anatomical comparison between two passive transcutaneous bone conduction implants in children.

OBJECTIVE: To compare anatomical and functional outcomes of two passive transcutaneous bone conduction implant systems: Sophono™ and BAHA Attract™. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients, affected by bilateral conductive hearing loss, underwent unilateral transcutaneous bone conduction implant surgery. Ten children received a Sophono™ implant (6 males, 4 females, mean age 11 years, mean unaided Pure Tone Average (PTA) 0.25-4kHz = 69.70dB HL) and 10 a BAHA Attract™ system (7 males, 3 females, mean age 19 years, mean unaided PTA0.25-4kHz = 66.40dB HL). The following outcomes were considered: incidence of local complications, hearing aid benefit, hearing aid gain and changes in quality of life (QOL), as measured by the Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory (GCBI). RESULTS: One patient in the Sophono group experienced magnet-related skin decubitus, while two patients (one per group) had skin hyperemia in the area overlying the magnet. The mean BAHA-aided threshold was 23.70dB, whereas the mean Sophono-aided threshold was 31.60dB. The mean gain was significantly different for lower frequencies, the BAHA having better functional outcomes. All patients reported an improvement in their QOL. CONCLUSION: Given the lower thickness of the internal magnet, the Sophono™ system might be more suitable for younger children, whereas BAHA offered better functional results. Both systems can be considered valid and safe options for the functional rehabilitation of conductive hearing loss in children, provided that precautions are observed, such as a gradual use of the device and use of the least powerful magnets in the first months after the activation.

A multicenter study on objective and subjective benefits with a transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid device: first Nordic results.

Examination of objective as well as subjective outcomes with a new transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid device. The study was designed as a prospective multicenter consecutive case-series study involving tertiary referral centers at two Danish University Hospitals. A total of 23 patients were implanted. Three were lost to follow-up. Patients had single-sided deafness, conductive or mixed hearing loss. INTERVENTION: Rehabilitative. Aided and unaided sound field hearing was evaluated objectively using (1) pure warble tone thresholds, (2) pure-tone average (PTA4), (3) speech discrimination score (SDS) in quiet, and (4) speech reception threshold 50% at 70 dB SPL noise level (SRT50%). Subjective benefit was evaluated by three validated questionnaires: (1) the IOI-HA, (2) the SSQ-12, and (3) a questionnaire evaluating both the frequency and the duration of hearing aid usage. The mean aided PTA4 was lowered by 14.7 dB. SDS was increased by 37.5% at 50 dB SPL, SRT50% in noise improved 1.4 dB. Aided thresholds improved insignificantly at frequencies above 2 kHz. 52.9% of the patients used their device every day, and 76.5% used the device at least 5 days a week. Mean IOI-HA score was 3.4, corresponding to a good benefit. In SSQ-12, "quality of hearing" scored especially high. Patients with a conductive and/or mixed hearing loss benefitted the most. This device demonstrates a significant subjective hearing benefit 8 month post surgery. In patients with conductive and/or mixed hearing losses, patient satisfaction and frequency of use were high. Objective gain measures showed less promising results especially in patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) compared to other bone conduction devices.

[Pediatric hearing rehabilitation with the Baha® Attract implant system]. / Fiatalkori hallásrehabilitáció Baha® Attract implantátumrendszerrel.

INTRODUCTION: Baha® Attract is a new transcutaneous bone-conduction hearing aid, which is more preferable in childhood than the conventional percutaneous systems. AIM: Our aim was to demonstrate the possibilities of application in childhood. METHOD: Eight children have undergone surgeries (mean age of 13.2 ± 3.2 years; "posterosuperior" incision technique, 5 mm implants). The thickness of the skull bone was determined in 72 children (1-8 years old) at the recommended implant site, based on CT scans. RESULTS: The average duration of surgeries was 30 minutes. There were no intra- and postoperative complications observed. Sound processors were fitted at the postoperative 4th week. Hearing measurements proved 51.58±11.22SD dBHL gain in warble tone thresholds, and 43.3 ± 16.02 SD dB in speech discrimination thresholds. The skull bone thickness was measured as 3.39 ± 1.05 SD mm. CONCLUSION: The Baha Attract system is a new tool for hearing rehabilitation in pediatric population. Preoperative CT provides valuable knowledge about skull bone thickness. Orv. Hetil., 2017, 158(8), 304-310.

[Clinical application and recent advance in BAHA].

There are many deafness patients at present in the world. Bone-anchored hearing aids are well-established solutions for treatment of hearing-impaired patients,such as conductive deafness,mixed deafness and single side deafness. The article aimed to review the basic structure,clinical indications,surgical method and complications of bone anchored hearing aids,and for a new BAHA attract system,we also have a brief discussion. To conclude,the BAHA attract system is an aesthetic,easy,safe and effective hearing aid,and become the patient's preference.

Conversion of traditional osseointegrated bone-anchored hearing aids to the Baha® attract in four pediatric patients.

Bone-anchored hearing aids are external devices attached to the skull via a titanium implant, and can be used for multiple types of hearing loss. Traditionally, osseointegrated implants have been coupled to the external processor with a percutaneous abutment, but more recently, a fully implanted, transcutaneous magnet-based system has become available. Skin reactions from the percutaneous portion are a common complication that can prevent use of the device during critical windows of language development and learning in children. We describe our experience replacing the Baha® abutment system with the Baha® Attract in four pediatric patients. Specific operative considerations for incision placement, and magnet and implant coverage are discussed. All patients maintained osseointegration, had excellent long-term wound healing without post-operative infection, and were able to wear their devices more consistently.

Three year experience with the cochlear BAHA attract implant: a systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Bone conduction devices are widely used and indicated in cases of conductive, mixed or single sided deafness where conventional hearing aids are not indicated or tolerated. Percutaneous bone-conduction devices gave satisfactory hearing outcomes but were frequently complicated by soft tissue reactions. Transcutaneous bone conduction devices were developed in order to address some of the issues related to the skin-penetrating abutment. The aim of this article is to present a systematic review of the indications, surgical technique and audiological, clinical and functional outcomes of the BAHA Attract device reported so far. METHODS: A systematic computer-based literature search was performed on the PubMed database as well as Scopus, Cochrane and Google Scholar. Out of 497 articles, 10 studies and 89 reported cases were finally included in our review. RESULTS: The vast majority of implanted patients were satisfied with the aesthetics of the device scoring highly at the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, Glasgow Benefit Inventory and Client Oriented Scale of Improvement. Overall, hearing outcomes, tested by various means including speech in noise, free field hearing testing and word discrimination scores showed a significant improvement. Complications included seroma or haematoma formation, numbness around the area of the flap, swelling and detachment of the sound processor from the external magnet. CONCLUSIONS: The functional and audiological results presented so far in the literature have been satisfactory and the complication rate is low compared to the skin penetrating Bone Conduction Devices. Further robust trials will be needed to study the long-term outcomes and any adverse effects.

Surgical, functional and audiological evaluation of new Baha(®) Attract system implantations.

Bone-anchored hearing aids are well-established solutions for treatment of hearing-impaired patients. However, classical systems with percutaneous abutments have disadvantages concerning aesthetics, hygiene and adverse soft tissue reactions. The study aimed to evaluate surgical, functional and audiological results of a new Baha(®) Attract system, in which the sound processor is attached by magnetic force. Twenty patients implanted with a Baha(®) Attract system were divided into two groups: A-bilateral mixed and conductive hearing loss, B-single-sided deafness, and evaluated during a 6-month follow-up. Parameters analysed comprised: (1) surgery and wound healing, (2) postoperative functional results (GBI, APHAB and BAHU questionnaires), (3) audiological results (free field speech in noise audiometry in two situations: with signal from implant side and from contralateral side). Obtained results revealed: mean time of surgery-44 min, soft tissue reduction-30 %, bone polishing-20 %, haematoma-10 %. Functional results showed: GBI total score-29.6 points, APHAB global score mean gain-23.5 %, BAHU 'good or very good' score for: aesthetic-85 %, hygiene-100 %, ease of placing the processor-100 %, stability of attraction-75 %. Audiological results-mean gain for the two analysed situations: 32.9 % (group A-36.5 %, group B-27.5 %). To conclude, the data obtained prove the safety and effectiveness of the Baha(®) Attract system in patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss as well as in patients with single-sided deafness. Cosmetic aspects are highly acceptable and the idea of Attract itself is important for patients with limited manual dexterity.