Comparison between automated and manual measurements of carotid intima-media thickness in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The measurement of carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) has been used as a marker of arterial wall disease. Manual measurements have been performed in most epidemiological studies, but, due to the introduction of new technologies, automated software has been increasingly used. This study aimed to compare manual versus automated cIMT measurements in common carotid (CC), bifurcation (BIF), and internal carotid (IC). METHODS: Automated and manual cIMT measurements were performed online in 43 middle-aged females. Carotid segment measurements were compared by Bland-Altman plot and the variation and repeatability coefficients between observers were also determined for comparison. RESULTS: The average timespan for manual measurements (57.30 s) were significantly higher than for automated measurements (2.52 s). There were no systematic errors between methods in any carotid segments. The variation coefficient was 5.54% to 6.34% for CC and BIF, 9.76% for IC, and absolute differences were 85% below 0.1 mm and 70% below 0.05 mm. Interobserver agreement showed no systematic error. The variation and the repeatability coefficients were better for the automated than manual measures. CONCLUSION: Although both methods are reliable for cIMT measurements, the automated technique allows faster evaluation with lesser variability for all carotid segments currently used in atherosclerosis research.

Importância da metodologia na dosagem de testosterona sérica: comparação entre um imunoensaio direto e um método fundamentado em cromatografia líquida de alta performance e espectrometria de massa em tandem (HPLC/MS-MS) / The importance of methodology in serum testosterone measurement: comparison between a direct immunoassay and a method based on high performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS-MS)

A dosagem de testosterona sérica, total ou fração livre, é metodologia de alto valor diagnóstico e encontra-se disponível na maioria dos laboratórios clínicos. Esta disponibilidade foi possível pelo desenvolvimento de metodologias simples e diretas, adaptáveis a plataformas de dosagem automatizada. Uma série de publicações recentes tem alertado quanto às limitações destas metodologias, em especial em amostras com baixas concentrações, como mulheres e crianças. Neste trabalho serão apresentados os resultados do emprego de uma metodologia de referência, fundamentada em cromatografia líquida de alta performance e espectrometria de massa em tandem (HPLC/MS-MS), e sua comparação com uma dosagem de rotina (ensaio eletroquimioluminescente - ECLIA). Os métodos são comparados tanto na dosagem de testosterona total (n = 213) quanto na determinação de testosterona livre calculada com base na determinação da testosterona total e da proteína carregadora de hormônios sexuais (SHBG) (n = 135). Os valores obtidos com o ECLIA são significativamente mais elevados, sendo a dispersão mais nítida em soros com baixas concentrações. Tal fenômeno fica mais claro quando apresentado na forma de gráficos de Bland-Altman. Neste trabalho são discutidas as dificuldades de implementação de uma metodologia de referência, como a apresentada, e a convivência com as metodologias de rotina, bem como a literatura recente sobre o assunto.

Serum testosterone in its total or free form, is a highly valuable diagnostic test and is available in the great majority of clinical laboratories. This reality was possible due to the development of simple and direct assays, adaptable to large automatic systems. Recent publications have called attention to the limitations of these simplified methodologies, mainly in samples with low concentration, as women and children. In this paper we present results obtained using a reference method based on high performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS-MS) and its comparison with those obtained with a commercial routine immunoassay (electrochemiluminescent assay, ECLIA). Methods were compared in total testosterone measurement (n = 213), as well as in free testosterone evaluation based on calculation inclu-ding sex hormone-binding protein (SHBG) levels (n = 135). Values obtained with ECLIA were significantly higher, with more marked dispersion in low concentration. This phenomenon is clearer when presented as a Bland-Altman plot. Difficulties in the implementation of reference methods as the one presented are discussed, as well as the necessity of caution in the interpretation of values obtained with routine assays, a matter of several publications in recent literature.