Assessing the Post-Activation Performance Enhancement of Upper Limbs in Basketball Athletes: A Sensor-Based Study of Rapid Stretch Compound and Blood Flow Restriction Training.

OBJECTIVE: This study introduces a novel methodology combining rapid stretch compound training with blood flow restriction (BFR) to investigate post activation performance enhancement (PAPE) in basketball players, a field that has been predominantly explored for lower limbs. We aimed to assess the efficacy of this combined approach on upper limb muscle performance in athletes. METHODS: We employed a randomized, self-controlled crossover trial with ten male basketball players. The bench press throw (BPT) served as the primary metric, with players undergoing four interventions post-baseline: (1) STR-plyometric training; (2) BFR-blood flow restriction; (3) COMB-STR integrated with BFR; and (4) CON-control. Innovatively, we utilized an intelligent tracking sensor to precisely measure peak power (PP), peak velocity (PV), mean power (MP), and mean velocity (MV) at 4, 8, and 12 min post-intervention, providing a detailed temporal analysis of PAPE. RESULTS: The COMB intervention demonstrated superior PAPE effects at 4 min, significantly outperforming STR and BFR alone and the control group across all measured indices (p < 0.05). Notably, the COMB group maintained these improvements for PV, PP, and H up to 12 min post-intervention, suggesting a prolonged effect. CONCLUSION: (1) The COMB stimulation has been shown to successfully induce PAPE more effectively than STR and BFR modality alone. (2) It appears that the optimal effects of PAPE are achieved within 4 min of exercising under this COMB. By the 12 min mark, only the COMB group continued to show significant improvements in PV, PP, and H compared to both the baseline and the CON group, while the effects in the STR and BFR groups further diminished. This suggests that although the PAPE effect is maintained over time, its optimal performance may peak at the 4 min mark and then gradually weaken as time progresses.

Effects of Acute Piano Performance With Blood Flow Restriction on Upper Limb Muscle and Perceptual Response in Pianists.

BACKGROUND:  Long-term and prolonged piano performance does not provide essential skeletal muscle training benefits while increasing the risk of injury to the upper extremities. Unlike high-intensity exercise training, moderate blood flow restriction (BFR) training has been found to improve neuromuscular mechanisms with a variety of physical exercises (machine, elastic band, walking, electrical stimulation, and body weight). AIM AND METHODS:  We investigated the physiological and perceptual responses related to piano performance with or without BFR based on acute responses of neuromuscular mechanisms. Student or professional pianists (n=7) performed the "Revolutionary Etude" on the piano with (Piano-BFR) and without (Piano-Ctrl) BFR. During the Piano-BFR performance, 150-180 mmHg of cuff pressure was applied around the most proximal region of both arms as a moderate BFR. RESULTS:  Changes in upper limb girth, muscle thickness, and hand grip strength were measured before and immediately after the performance. After the performance, perceptual and other responses were recorded. Immediately after the performance, the Piano-BFR condition induced greater changes in girth (forearm and upper arm), muscle thickness (forearm), and handgrip strength than the Piano-Ctrl condition. Piano-BFR was (p<0.01) higher than Piano-Ctrl on eight questions regarding perceptual response (upper arm fatigue and difficulty playing the piano). Piano performance with BFR was revealed to increase upper extremity muscle size and fatigue in pianists after playing. CONCLUSION:  Piano performance with BFR was revealed to increase upper extremity muscle size and fatigue in pianists after playing. The effect of BFR on neuromuscular mechanisms on piano performance was greater in the forearm than in the upper arm.

The effects of blood flow restriction training on post activation potentiation and upper limb muscle activation: a meta-analysis.

Objective: This meta-analysis aims to systematically evaluate the impact of blood flow restriction training (BFRT) on muscle activation and post-activation potentiation (PAP) in the upper limbs, to provide guidance for upper limb protocols aiming to enhance explosive strength and activation. Methods: PubMed, CNKI, Web of Science, and EBSCO databases were queried to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of upper limb BFRT on muscle activation and PAP. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied using the Cochrane bias risk tool. Literature quality assessment and statistical analysis were conducted using Revman 5.4 and Stata 17.0 software. Sensitivity analysis and funnel plots were utilized to assess result stability and publication bias. Results: A total of 31 articles involving 484 participants were included in the analysis. Meta-analysis results showed that upper limb BFRT significantly increased muscle iEMG values [SMD = 0.89, 95%CI (0.21, 1.58), p = 0.01]. BFRT had a significant effect on upper limb explosive force [SMD = 0.73, 95%CI (0.41, 1.04), p < 0.00001]. Subgroup analysis based on literature heterogeneity (I 2 = 92%, 80%) showed that exhaustive BFRT significantly decreased upper limb iEMG [SMD = -0.67, 95%CI (-1.25, -0.09), p = 0.01], with exercise modes including maximum output power of bench press [SMD = 1.87, 95%CI (0.22, 3.53), p < 0.0001], exercise intensity of 40%-70% 1RM [SMD = 1.31, 95%CI (0.61, 2.01), p < 0.0001], and pressure intensity of ≥60% AOP [SMD = 0.83, 95%CI (0.43, 1.23), p < 0.0001] reaching maximum effects and statistical significance. Conclusion: Upper limb BFRT can induce muscle activation and PAP. BFRT with 40%-70% 1RM and ≥60% AOP in the upper limbs is more likely to promote PAP. Systematic Review Registration: http://inplasy.com, identifier INPLASY202430008.

Blood flow restriction training for an individual with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 4 ankle osteoarthritis following childhood clubfoot repair: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Ankle osteoarthritis (OA) is a disease involving pain and decreased physical function which can attenuate the tolerance to perform high-load resistance training. Low-load blood flow restriction (BFR) training has been demonstrated to improve muscle strength, muscle size, and physical function in patients suffering from OA. OBJECTIVE: We examined the effects of 12 weeks of BFR-training performed 4 times a week in an individual with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade 4 ankle OA. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 32-year-old woman with KL grade 4 right ankle OA subsequent to a clubfoot repair in childhood performed 12 weeks of BFR-training. Four exercises with concurrent blood flow restriction (60% of arterial occlusion pressure) targeting the lower leg were performed 4 times/week. The following outcome measures were collected at baseline and 12 weeks after BFR-training: The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), calf circumference, maximal isometric muscle strength, single-leg heel raise test, single-leg stance test, and lateral side-hop test. OUTCOMES: Adherence to the training was 93.75%. The patient demonstrated improvements in FAOS subscale symptoms, pain, and sports/recreational activities by 19-47 points (minimal detectable change (MDC) = 18-21.5 points); maximal muscle strength in plantarflexion (36%), eversion (55%), and inversion (38%) (MDC for plantarflexion = 16.81-29.97%). The single-leg heel raise test and the lateral side-hop test improved with 66% and 51%, respectively. Calf circumference was maintained. CONCLUSION: BFR-training improved patient-reported outcomes, lower leg muscle strength, and physical function in an individual suffering from KL grade 4 ankle OA following childhood clubfoot repair.

Effects of Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Training on Rotator Cuff Strength and Hypertrophy: Case Series.

Background: The rotator cuff (RC) plays a pivotal role in the performance and health of the shoulder and upper extremity. Blood flow restriction training (BFRT) is a modality to improve strength and muscle hypertrophy with even low-load training in healthy and injured individuals. There is minimal evidence examining its effect proximal to the occluded area, and particularly on the RC. Hypothesis & Purpose: The purpose of this case series is to explore the effects of low-load BFRT on RC strength, hypertrophy, and tendon thickness in asymptomatic individuals. Study Design: Case series. Methods: Fourteen participants with asymptomatic, untrained shoulders were recruited to participate. They performed an eight-week low-load shoulder exercise regimen where BFR was applied to the dominant arm only during exercise. The dependent variables were maximal isometric strength of the shoulder external rotators(ER) and elevators (in the scapular plane in full can position) (FC) measured via handheld dynamometry, cross sectional area (CSA) of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles, and supraspinatus tendon thickness measured via ultrasound imaging (US). Mean changes within and between arms were compared after training using paired t-tests. Cohen's d was used to determine effect sizes. Results: All participants were able to complete the BFRT regimen without adverse effects. Mean strength and CSA increased for all variables in both arms, however this increase was only significant (p\<0.01) for FC strength bilaterally and CSA for the supraspinatus and infraspinatus on the BFRT side. The effect sizes for increased supraspinatus and infraspinatus CSA on the BFRT side were 0.40 (9.8% increase) and 0.46 (11.7% increase) respectively. There were no significant differences when comparing the mean changes of the BFRT side to the non-BFRT side for strength or muscle CSA. There were no significant changes to supraspinatus tendon thickness. Conclusion: These results suggest variability in response of the RC musculature to low-load BFRT in asymptomatic individuals. The potential for a confounding systemic response in the study design makes determining whether low-load BFRT is more beneficial than low-load non-BFRT difficult. The hypertrophy seen on the BFRT side warrants further study. Level of Evidence: 4.

Blood flow restriction Exercise in the perioperative setting to Prevent loss of muscle mass in patients with pancreatic, biliary tract, and liver cancer: study protocol for the PREV-Ex randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients diagnosed with pancreatic, biliary tract, and liver cancer often suffer from a progressive loss of muscle mass. Given the considerable functional impairments in these patients, high musculoskeletal weight loads may not be well tolerated by all individuals. The use of blood-flow restricted resistance training (BFR-T) which only requires low training loads may allow for a faster recovery of muscle due to avoidance of high levels of mechanical muscle stress associated with high-load resistance exercise. This study aims to investigate whether BFR-T can prevent or slow down the loss of skeletal muscle mass and enhance the functional capacity and mental health of patients with pancreatic, biliary tract, and liver cancer. METHODS: The PREV-Ex exercise trial is a multicenter two-armed randomized controlled trial. Patients will be randomized to an exercise program consisting of home-based low-load BFR-T during a combined pre- and postoperative period for a total of 6-10 weeks (prehabilitation and rehabilitation), or to a control group. Protein supplementation will be given to both groups to ensure adequate protein intake. The primary outcomes, skeletal muscle thickness and muscle cross-sectional area, will be assessed by ultrasound. Secondary outcomes include the following: (i) muscle catabolism-related and inflammatory bio-markers (molecular characteristics will be assessed from a vastus lateralis biopsy and blood samples will be obtained from a sub-sample of patients); (ii) patient-reported outcome measures (self-reported fatigue, health-related quality of life, and nutritional status will be assessed through validated questionnaires); (iii) physical fitness/performance/activity (validated tests will be used to evaluate physical function, cardiorespiratory fitness and maximal isometric muscle strength. Physical activity and sedentary behavior (assessed using an activity monitor); (iv) clinical outcomes: hospitalization rates and blood status will be recorded from the patients' medical records; (v) explorative outcomes of patients' experience of the exercise program which will be evaluated using focus group/individual interviews. DISCUSSION: It is worthwhile to investigate new strategies that have the potential to counteract the deterioration of skeletal muscle mass, muscle function, strength, and physical function, all of which have debilitating consequences for patients with pancreatic, biliary tract, and liver cancer. The expected findings could improve prognosis, help patients stay independent for longer, and possibly reduce treatment-related costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05044065. Registered on September 14, 2021.

Effect of One Session of Muscle Blood Flow Restriction Training Versus Normal Training on Blood Lactate Level.

Objectives: Blood flow restriction training (BFRT) is useful for improving muscle strength. However, it involves a long training time and is unsuitable for vigorous exercise. Muscle blood flow restriction training (MBFRT), which uses multiple parallel pneumatic cuffs (MPCs) to compress large areas of the extremities and restrict blood flow, was subsequently developed to address these issues. This study compared the effects of MBFRT with normal training (NT). Methods: Ten healthy adults underwent low-intensity MBFRT. MPC pressure was increased to 200 mmHg just before training. The exercise was a bodyweight half-squat. Three sets of 30 squats were performed. Two weeks later, the participants underwent NT with the same exercise. Blood lactate levels were measured before the start of training and at 1 and 5 min after training. The Borg index was also measured at the end of the training. Results: The blood lactate level was elevated at 1 min after MBFRT and NT. The elevated blood lactate level was maintained at 5 min after MBFRT, whereas the lactate level was significantly decreased at 5 min after NT. The Borg index at the end of the training was significantly higher in MBFRT than in NT. Conclusions: Lactic acid accumulates in the muscles during low-intensity MBFRT, thereby initiating type II fiber activity.

Outcomes of Blood Flow Restriction Training After ACL Reconstruction in NCAA Division I Athletes.

Background: Blood flow restriction training (BFRT) is a safe and potentially effective adjunctive therapeutic modality for postoperative rehabilitation related to various knee pathologies. However, there is a paucity of literature surrounding BFRT in high-performance athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Purpose: To (1) compare the overall time to return to sports (RTS) in a cohort of National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I athletes who underwent a standardized rehabilitation program either with or without BFRT after ACLR and (2) identify a postoperative time interval for which BFRT has the maximum therapeutic benefit. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 55 student-athletes who underwent ACLR between 2000 and 2023 while participating in NCAA Division I sports at a single institution were included in this study. Athletes were allocated to 1 of 2 groups based on whether they participated in a standardized postoperative rehabilitation program augmented with BFRT (BFRT group; n = 22) or completed the standardized protocol alone (non-BFRT group [control]; n = 33). Our primary outcome measure was time to RTS. The secondary outcome measure was handheld dynamometry quadriceps strength testing at various postoperative time points, converted to a limb symmetry index (LSI). Quadriceps strength was not tested between the BFRT and non-BFRT groups because of the limited amount of data on the control group. Results: The mean age at the date of surgery was 18.59 ± 1.10 years for the BFRT group and 19.45 ± 1.30 years for the non-BFRT group (P = .011), and the mean RTS time was 409 ± 134 days from surgery for the BFRT group and 332 ± 100 days for the non-BFRT cohort (P = .047). For the BFRT group, the mean quadriceps strength LSI increased by 0.67% (95% CI, 0.53%-0.81%) for every week of rehabilitation, and there was a significantly positive rate of change in quadriceps strength in weeks 13-16 compared with weeks 9-12 (ΔLSI, 8.22%; P < .001). Conclusion: In elite NCAA Division I athletes, a statistically significant delay was observed in RTS with BFRT compared with standardized physical therapy alone after undergoing ACLR. There also appeared to be an early window during the rehabilitation period where BFRT had a beneficial impact on quadriceps strength.

Effect of blood flow restriction with low-intensity resistance training in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effects of blood flow restriction with low-intensity resistance training (BFR + LIRT) on pain, adverse events, muscle strength, and function in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: This study adhered to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses 2020 (PRISMA 2020) and applied the A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR2) standards to ensure the high quality of the systematic review. A comprehensive literature search was conducted until August 2023 using four selected keywords (osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, blood flow restriction training, and resistance training) across five search engines (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and PEDro). RESULTS: Ten studies were analyzed. The results showed that BFR + LIRT had similar effects on pain, risk of adverse events, muscle strength, self-reported function, and physical function compared with resistance training (RT). CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis further support the potential of BFR + LIRT in the disease management of patients with OA or RA. According to this analysis, BFR + LIRT had a lower risk of adverse events than high-intensity resistance training (HIRT) and may be a safer training modality. BFR + LIRT offers greater advantages in improving physical function than LIRT and was able to provide similar benefits to HIRT without increasing the training load. These findings suggest that BFR + LIRT is a safe and effective strategy for treating patients with OA or RA. However, owing to the limited number of studies covered in this analysis, additional higher-quality studies are needed to strengthen this conclusion.

Blood flow restriction training improves the efficacy of routine intervention in patients with chronic ankle instability.

As a new means of rehabilitation, blood flow restriction training (BFRT) is widely used in the field of musculoskeletal rehabilitation. To observe whether BFRT can improve the efficacy of routine rehabilitation intervention in patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI). Twenty-three patients with CAI were randomly divided into a routine rehabilitation group (RR Group) and a routine rehabilitation â€‹+ â€‹blood flow restriction training group (RR â€‹+ â€‹BFRT Group) according to the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) score. The RR Group was treated with routine rehabilitation means for intervention, and the RR â€‹+ â€‹BFRT Group was treated with a tourniquet to restrict lower limb blood flow for rehabilitation training based on routine training. Before and after the intervention, the CAIT score on the affected side, standing time on one leg with eyes closed, comprehensive scores of the Y-balance test, and surface electromyography data of tibialis anterior (TA) and peroneus longus (PL) were collected to evaluate the recovery of the subjects. Patients were followed up 1 year after the intervention. After 4 weeks of intervention, the RR â€‹+ â€‹BFRT Group CAIT score was significantly higher than the RR Group (19.33 VS 16.73, p â€‹< â€‹0.05), the time of standing on one leg with eyes closed and the comprehensive score of Y-balance were improved, but there was no statistical difference between groups (p â€‹> â€‹0.05). RR â€‹+ â€‹BFRT Group increased the muscle activation of the TA with maximum exertion of the ankle dorsal extensor (p â€‹< â€‹0.05) and had no significant change in the muscle activation of the PL with maximum exertion of the ankle valgus (p â€‹> â€‹0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of resprains within 1 year between the groups (36.36% VS 16.67%, p â€‹> â€‹0.05). The incidence of ankle pain in the RR â€‹+ â€‹BFRT Group was lower than that in the RR Group (63.64% VS 9.09%, p â€‹< â€‹0.01). Therefore, four-weeks BFRT improves the effect of the routine intervention, and BFRT-related interventions are recommended for CAI patients with severe ankle muscle mass impairment or severe pain.

Potential Moderators of the Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training on Muscle Strength and Hypertrophy: A Meta-analysis Based on a Comparison with High-Load Resistance Training.

BACKGROUND: While it has been examined whether there are similar magnitudes of muscle strength and hypertrophy adaptations between low-load resistance training combined with blood-flow restriction training (BFR-RT) and high-load resistance training (HL-RT), some important potential moderators (e.g., age, sex, upper and lower limbs, frequency and duration etc.) have yet to be analyzed further. Furthermore, training status, specificity of muscle strength tests (dynamic versus isometric or isokinetic) and specificity of muscle mass assessments (locations of muscle hypertrophy assessments) seem to exhibit different effects on the results of the analysis. The role of these influencing factors, therefore, remains to be elucidated. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the effects of BFR- versus HL-RT on muscle adaptations, when considering the influence of population characteristics (training status, sex and age), protocol characteristics (upper or lower limbs, duration and frequency) and test specificity. METHODS: Studies were identified through database searches based on the following inclusion criteria: (1) pre- and post-training assessment of muscular strength; (2) pre- and post-training assessment of muscular hypertrophy; (3) comparison of BFR-RT vs. HL-RT; (4) score ≥ 4 on PEDro scale; (5) means and standard deviations (or standard errors) are reported or allow estimation from graphs. In cases where the fifth criterion was not met, the data were requested directly from the authors. RESULTS: The main finding of the present study was that training status was an important influencing factor in the effects of BFR-RT. The trained individuals may gain greater muscle strength and hypertrophy with BFR-RT as compared to HL-RT. However, the results showed that the untrained individuals experienced similar muscle mass gains and superior muscle strength gains in with HL-RT compared to BFR-RT. CONCLUSION: Compared to HL-RT, training status is an important factor influencing the effects of the BFR-RT, in which trained can obtain greater muscle strength and hypertrophy gains in BFR-RT, while untrained individuals can obtain greater strength gains and similar hypertrophy in HL-RT.

Study on the effect of blood flow restriction training combined with IASTAM on ankle strength and function intervention in athletes with chronic ankle instability in sport dance events.

BACKGROUND: Athletes engaged in sports dance frequently encounter the potential for ankle injuries and instability, factors that may contribute to diminished training efficacy, compromised athletic performance, prolonged recuperation, and heightened susceptibility to recurring injuries. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of an exercise intervention (comprising blood flow restriction training combined with low-load ankle muscle strength training and balance training) as well as instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) on the foot and ankle function, strength, and range of motion in sports dance athletes exhibiting ankle instability (CAI). METHODS: Thirty participants exhibiting ankle instability, restriction, or discomfort were recruited and randomly assigned to two groups: the Test group (comprising blood flow restriction training combined with IASTM, n = 15) and the traditional ankle strength training group (n = 15). The intervention spanned 4 weeks, with one session per week. Assessment of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), and ankle range of motion occurred at three time points: pre-intervention, immediately following the initial intervention, and after 4 weeks of intervention. Ankle strength testing was conducted solely before and after the intervention for comparative analysis. RESULTS: There were no significant variances in baseline characteristics between the two intervention groups. In terms of CAIT scores, both groups exhibited notably higher scores following the initial intervention and after 4 weeks of intervention compared to pre-intervention (P < 0.05). The Test group displayed higher CAIT scores than the control group, signifying a more pronounced enhancement in ankle stability among patients in the Test group. Concerning FAAM scores, both groups significantly enhanced ankle function in CAI patients (P < 0.05), with the Test group demonstrating notably higher FAAM-SPORT scores than the control group (P < 0.05), indicating superior restoration of athletic capability in the Test group. As for improvements in ankle range of motion, both groups demonstrated significant enhancements compared to pre-intervention (P < 0.05). The Test group exhibited significantly superior improvements in dorsiflexion, eversion, and inversion range of motion compared to the control group (P < 0.05), while the control group did not exhibit significant enhancements in plantarflexion and eversion range of motion (P > 0.05). Both groups displayed enhanced ankle strength in CAI patients following the intervention (P < 0.05), with the Test group manifesting notably higher dorsiflexion and inversion strength than the control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both blood flow restriction training combined with IASTM and traditional ankle strength and stability training have shown significant improvements in stability, function, strength, and range of motion in CAI patients. Furthermore, the Test group exhibits superior efficacy in ankle stability, daily functional movement, dorsiflexion, and eversion range of motion compared to the control group. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: 9 February 2024, ClinicalTrials.gov, ID; NCT06251414.

Effect of blood flow restriction combined with low-intensity plyometric jump training on functional ankle instabil-ity / 中国康复理论与实践

Objective To investigate the effect of blood flow restriction combined with low-intensity plyometric jump training(LI-PJT+BFR)on lower limb dynamic postural control of functional ankle instability(FAI)in college students. Methods From March to May,2023,40 FAI college students were recruited from Xi'an Physical Education University,and randomly divided into high-intensity plyometric jump training(HI-PJT,n = 14)group,low-intensity plyomet-ric jump training(LI-PJT,n = 13)group and LI-PJT+BFR group(n = 13).All the groups finished the six-week corresponding training.The maximum voluntary isometric contraction(MVIC)of tibialis anterior,peroneus lon-gus,lateral head of gastrocnemius,gluteus maximus,vastus lateralis,biceps femoris and semitendinosus were measured,and the root mean square(RMS)of electromyography of these muscles was measured during the sin-gle-leg landing(SLL),using wireless surface electromyography before and after intervention.Moreover,they were assessed with Y-balance test and Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool(CAIT). Results MVIC and RMS of the target muscles improved after intervention in all the groups(t>2.218,P<0.05),except MVIC and RMS of peroneus longus,gluteus maximus,biceps femoris and semitendinosus in LI-PJT group,and RMS of peroneus longus in LI-PJT+BFR group;and MVIC and RMS of the target muscles were the least in LI-PJT group(F>3.262,P<0.05),except those of peroneus longus.The extension scores of Y-balance test and the total score improved after intervention(t>2.485,P<0.05),and they were the least in LI-PJT group(F>5.042,P<0.05).The CAIT score improved after intervention(t>5.227,P<0.001),and it was the least in LI-PJT group(F = 4.640,P<0.05). Conclusion LI-PJT+BFR could improve lower limb dynamic postural control of FAI college students,which is similar to HI-PJT.

Application trends of blood flow restriction training in clinical rehabilitation / 中国组织工程研究

BACKGROUND:The use of blood flow restriction training in clinical rehabilitation is becoming more common,in part due to technological advances and increased interest in research and medicine. OBJECTIVE:To explore the global trend and development prospects of clinical rehabilitation-related blood flow restriction training application,identify research gaps,and propose future research directions. METHODS:Web of Science,PubMed,and Elsevier were searched for literature related to clinical rehabilitation using blood flow restriction training published from 2001 to 2022.A total of 515 articles were included for further review.Bibliometrics,exploratory factor analysis and cluster analysis were used to reveal the emerging research fields and topics. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:First of all,the overall research trend of the number of published articles shows a steady rise.The United States is the main research area in this field,and universities contribute the most to journals.Secondly,a core group of authors,led by Loenneke JP,Abe T and Dankel SJ,has been formed,with less collaboration among highly productive authors.Finally,research on blood flow restriction training focuses on skeletal muscle rehabilitation,cognitive functional activity,and chronic disease rehabilitation in clinical rehabilitation,with particular attention to the application of blood flow restriction in the recovery of symptoms such as muscle atrophy,knee pain,and joint effusion after anterior cruciate reconstruction surgery.Theoretical research on low-pressure blood flow restriction that is effective in relieving musculoskeletal symptoms has been hot in recent years,which can systematically guide the musculoskeletal rehabilitation in clinical practice.In the future,clinicians will extend follow-up periods,register larger and more diverse sample sizes,and use randomization techniques to determine appropriate prescribing indications for rehabilitating patients,ensure clinical safety,and quantitatively analyze and develop rehabilitation protocols with the maximum effect at the minimum effective dose for different clinical populations.

Knee function recovery in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction after blood flow restriction training:a meta-analysis / 中国组织工程研究

OBJECTIVE:To systematically review the clinical effect of blood flow restriction training on rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction to provide a reference for clinical practice. METHODS:Databases including CNKI,WanFang,PubMed,Web of Science and EBSCO were searched to collect randomized controlled trials of blood flow restriction training in the intervention of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction from inception to August 10,2022.Outcomes included knee muscle strength,knee muscle mass,and knee function evaluation,all of which were continuous variables.Two reviewers independently screened the literature and extracted data.Cochrane bias risk assessment tool and Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale were used to evaluate the bias risk of the included articles.Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.4 software. RESULTS:A total of 9 publications were included,including 226 subjects,114 in the trial group and 112 in the control group.Meta-analysis results showed that compared with conventional resistance training,the blood flow restriction training group could significantly improve knee muscle strength[SMD=0.54,95%CI(0.29,0.79),P＜0.01],muscle mass[SMD=0.26,95%CI(0.06,0.46),P=0.01]and knee joint function[SMD=1.17,95%CI(0.53,1.80),P＜0.01].Subgroup analysis showed that only when the intervention time was more than 4 weeks,there were significant improvements in knee joint muscle strength[SMD=0.68,95%CI(0.38,0.97),P＜0.01]and muscle mass[SMD=0.38,95%CI(0.09,0.68),P=0.01]. CONCLUSION:Current evidence shows that blood flow restriction training can improve muscle strength and knee function in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and reduce muscle atrophy.It is recommended that the postoperative intervention time should be more than 4 weeks to achieve better muscle strength and muscle mass improvement.

Effect of blood flow restriction training on the fitness benefit of upper limb muscles / 中国组织工程研究

BACKGROUND:Blood flow restriction training has broad application prospects in improving limb muscle strength.It has ideal effects on the upper limbs is ideal,and the specific application scheme has high research value. OBJECTIVE:To explain the influence of blood flow restriction training on the fitness benefits of upper limb muscles and summarize the specific programs of blood flow restriction training for upper limb,attempting to give suggestions on application programs based on existing studies. METHODS:Literature on the application of upper limb blood flow restriction training were searched in CNKI,WanFang,VIP,CBM,PubMed,Embase,EBSCO,Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases.The search terms were"blood flow restriction,blood flow restriction training,pressure training,upper limb,upper arm,forearm,arm,forearm"in Chinese and"blood flow restriction training,blood flow restriction exercise,blood flow restriction therapy,BFR therapy,occlusion training,KAATSU training,BFRT,upper extremity,upper limb,arm,forearm"in English.The relevant articles on the application of blood flow restriction training in the upper limbs included in the database from database inception to December 2022 were selected and screened according to inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Firstly,blood flow restriction training is mainly applied to healthy people,special athletes and people with upper limb injury.Secondly,the influence of blood flow restriction training on upper limb muscle fitness is mainly reflected in the increase of upper limb circumference,muscle strength,muscle endurance,muscle thickness,muscle cross-sectional area and explosive power of upper limb,followed by the cross migration phenomenon of the upper limbs.Thirdly,blood flow restriction training for the upper limbs mainly uses inflatable blood flow restriction devices:the cuff width was 3-5 cm,the pressure position was 1/3 of the upper arm,the limiting pressure was 40%-60%arterial occlusion pressure or 80-160 mmHg,the training load is 20%-30%1RM,the training volume is four sessions(30-15-15-15 times),the interval time was 30-60 seconds,and the training frequency was 2 or 3 times per week.

Blood flow restriction training interventions for sarcopenia in older adults:biological mechanisms and proposed application protocols / 中国组织工程研究

BACKGROUND:Sarcopenia is a chronic condition that leads to strength loss and functional decline,increasing the risk of frailty,disability,falls,and death in older adults.Blood flow restriction training can be effective in the treatment of sarcopenia,but a comprehensive review of its advantages,disadvantages,biological mechanisms,and application options is lacking. OBJECTIVE:To review the advantages,limitations,and biological mechanisms of blood flow restriction training interventions for sarcopenia and to give recommendations for application protocols based on current published evidence. METHODS:A search of major databases was conducted for literature published in the time frame up to February 2023.The search terms were"blood flow restriction training,KAATSU,elderly,sarcopenia,muscle"in English and Chinese.Finally,82 included papers were compiled and analyzed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Blood flow restriction training as an intervention for sarcopenia has been effective in peripheral muscle groups,but there are limitations in its application.Blood flow restriction training is highly operational and safe.This training can improve muscle strength and physical performance,but there are potential risks,including adverse events on skeletal muscle,cardiovascular and endothelial cells.Therefore,blood flow restriction training needs to be performed under scientific guidance and further studies are needed to verify its efficacy in patients with sarcopenia.The biological mechanisms of blood flow restriction training intervention in sarcopenia may include:increasing muscle hypertrophy due to reactive muscle congestion,improving muscle protein synthesis capacity,inducing metabolic stress adaptation,promoting skeletal muscle growth and repair,activating vascular endothelial growth factor signaling pathway to promote angiogenesis,and promoting satellite cell proliferation.However,these specific roles and combined effects of these mechanisms need to be determined by more in-depth studies.Blood flow restriction training interventions for sarcopenia are mainly influenced by training and cuffs.To avoid adverse events,it is recommended that 20%to 50%1RM,20 to 75 repetitions,2 to 3 times per week,30-60 seconds interval between sessions,smaller size cuffs with a pressurization value≤140 mmHg for upper limb training,and larger size cuffs with a pressurization value≤180 mmHg for lower limb training,usually 50%to 80%of the pressure value in the completely occluded artery.However,more research is needed on the training frequency and interval between sessions in older adults,and further research is needed on the optimal choice of cuff pressurization values.

Effects of endurance training with blood flow restriction on aerobic capacity,lower limb muscle strength,and sports performance:a Meta-analysis / 中国组织工程研究

OBJECTIVE:To systematically assess the effect of blood flow restriction combined with endurance training on aerobic capacity,lower limb muscle strength,and sports performance of athletes using Meta-analysis. METHODS:3210 studies were searched in CNKI,VIP,WanFang,PubMed,Embase,Web of Science,ScienceDirect,and Cochrane databases before March 2023.After screening,12 studies and 14 research reports were included.The traditional Meta-analysis and network Meta-analysis were performed by Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 14. RESULTS:Endurance training with blood flow restriction had a medium effect size on maximal oxygen uptake(standardized mean difference(SMD)=0.59,95%confidence interval(CI):0.28-0.90,P＜0.05)and no heterogeneity.The effect of continuous pressure was better than the other pressure types(P＜0.05).Compared with sports events by anaerobic energy supply,sports events by aerobic energy supply showed better effects(P＜0.05),which was set as follows:4-8 weeks of aerobic training,20-30 minutes once,3 or more sessions per week,for a total of 12 or more sessions.Secondly,endurance training with blood flow restriction showed a large effect on the lower limb muscle strength(SMD=0.99,95%CI:0.61-1.37,P＜0.05)and no heterogeneity.A subgroup analysis showed muscle endurance was the best improved(SMD=1.11;95%CI:0.37-1.85),followed by knee extension strength(SMD=1.02,95%CI:0.37-1.67)and knee flexion strength(SMD=0.87,95%CI:0.24-1.51).Finally,endurance training with blood flow restriction showed a medium effect on sports performance(SMD=0.59,95%CI:0.13-1.06,P＜0.05),and the subgroup analysis showed a medium effect on running performance(SMD=0.55,95%CI:0.05-1.06,P＜0.05)and no heterogeneity.There was only one item of soccer specific performance that was not analyzed. CONCLUSION:Endurance training combined with blood flow restriction can improve the aerobic capacity,lower limb muscle strength,and sports performance of the athletes.And there is a large effect on lower limb muscle strength and a medium effect on aerobic capacity and sports performance.A training schedule of progressive mixed-intensity aerobic endurance training under continuous pressure for no less than 4 weeks,3 sessions per week,20-30 minutes per session,for 12 or more sessions in total is easy to obtain better training results.

Changes in Arterial Stiffness in Response to Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Training: A Narrative Review.

Arterial stiffness naturally increases with age and is a known predictor of cardiovascular morbimortality. Blood flow restriction (BFR) training involves decreasing muscle blood flow by applying a strap or a pneumatic cuff during exercise. BFR induces muscle hypertrophy even at low intensities, making it an appealing option for older, untrained individuals. However, BFR use in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities is limited by the increased pressor and chronotropic response observed in hypertensive elderly patients. Furthermore, the impact of BFR on vascular function remains unclear. We conducted a comprehensive literature review according to PRISMA guidelines, summarizing available data on the acute and long-term consequences of BFR training on vascular function. Although evidence is still scarce, it seems that BFR has a mild or neutral long-term impact on arterial stiffness. However, current research shows that BFR can cause an abrupt, albeit transient, increase in PWV and central blood pressure. BFR and, preferably, lower-body BFR, should be prescribed with caution in older populations, especially in hypertensive patients who have an exacerbated muscle metaboreflex pressor response. Longer follow-up studies are required to assess the chronic effect of BFR training on arterial stiffness, especially in elderly patients who are usually unable to tolerate high-intensity resistance exercises.

The effects of blood flow restriction training on PAP and lower limb muscle activation: a meta-analysis.

Objective: This study aims to systematically evaluate the effects of blood flow restriction (BFR) training on lower limb muscle activation and post-activation potentiation (PAP) in athletes through a meta-analysis and discuss methods to improve instant muscle strength so as to provide a reference for training in this field. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the impact of BFR training on muscle activation and PAP were gathered through database searches, such as CNKI, Wanfang, Web of Science, PubMed, and others. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to include and exclude literature. Quality evaluation and statistical analysis were conducted using ReviewManager 5.3 software, STATA 16.0, and other software programs. The sensitivity analysis and funnel plots were employed to assess result stability and publication bias. Results: In total, 18 literature studies were included with a total of 267 subjects. The meta-analysis showed that BFR could significantly improve the RMS value of lower limb muscles [SMD = 0.98, 95% CI (0.71, 1.24), and p < 0.00001]. BFR had a significant effect on the immediate explosive power of the lower limbs [SMD = 0.28, 95% CI (0.02, 0.53), and p = 0.03], but the heterogeneity was obvious (I 2 = 51%). The subgroup analysis showed that different training methods may be influencing factors that lead to the heterogeneity between studies. The measurement indexes were the counter movement jump (CMJ) [SMD = 0.45, 95% CI (0.20, 0.69), and p = 0.0004], training mode to overcome body weight [SMD = 0.57, 95% CI (0.33, 0.82), and p < 0.00001], and compressive strength of 40%-60% arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) [SMD = 0.57, 95% CI (0.31, 0.83), and p < 0.0001], which reached the maximum effect and was statistically significant. Conclusion: BFR training can induce lower extremity muscle activation and PAP. Combining self-weight training with BFR exercises set at 40%-60% AOP appears to be particularly effective in inducing PAP, especially for enhancing CMJ. Furthermore, combining body-weight training with BFR is considered an effective warm-up method to improve CMJ. Systematic Review Registration: http://inplasy.com, identifier INPLASY2023100087.