Rupture of an accessory spleen caused by blunt trauma.

PURPOSE: The accessory spleen is quite a common abdominal anomaly. However, the traumatic accessory spleen rupture is an extremely rare condition requiring surgical intervention, even laparotomy. 9 cases of traumatic accessory spleen were found published between 1962 and 2022. The study aims to evaluate traumatic accessory spleen rupture cases regarding their causes, clinical course, and possible diagnosis without surgery and treatment. METHODS: Desk research method using available online databases. Descriptive methods were employed to analyze the collected data. The results are summarized in the Table concerning gender, age, injury details, accessory spleen injury characteristics, treatment, and others such as previous splenectomy or primary spleen involvement in injury or accompanying abdominal injuries. RESULTS: In total, there were 9 cases of traumatic accessory spleen, of which 2 were managed conservatively and the remaining 7 were treated operatively. All the patients survived. One-third of all included patients already had their primary spleen removed, which facilitated the diagnosis of traumatic rupture of an accessory spleen. The proper diagnosis of an accessory spleen rupture was concluded in 2 cases and confirmed in surgery. CONCLUSION: The recognition of the traumatic rupture of an accessory spleen before surgery is challenging but can be made easier if the patient underwent splenectomy before. The traumatic accessory spleen rupture does not coexist with an injury of a primary spleen.

Pelvic fractures in blunt trauma patients: A comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic fractures (PF) with concomitant injuries are on the rise due to an increase of high-energy trauma. Increase of the elderly population with age related comorbidities further complicates the management. Abdominal organ injuries are kindred with PF due to the proximity to pelvic bones. Presence of contrast blush (CB) on computed tomography in patients with PF is considered a sign of active bleeding, however, its clinical significance and association with outcomes is debatable. AIM: To analyze polytrauma patients with PF with a focus on the geriatric population, co-injuries and the value of contrast blush. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 558 patients with PF admitted to level 1 trauma center (01/2017-01/2023). Analyzed variables included: Age, sex, mechanism of injury (MOI), injury severity score (ISS), Glasgow coma scale (GCS), abbreviated injury scale (AIS), co-injuries, transfusion requirements, pelvic angiography, embolization, laparotomy, orthopedic pelvic surgery, intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay, discharge disposition and mortality. The study compared geriatric and non-geriatric patients, patients with and without CB and abdominal co-injuries. Propensity score matching was implemented in comparison groups. RESULTS: PF comprised 4% of all trauma admissions. 89 patients had CB. 286 (52%) patients had concomitant injuries including 93 (17%) patients with abdominal co-injuries. Geriatric patients compared to non-geriatric had more falls as MOI, lower ISS and AIS pelvis, higher GCS, less abdominal co-injuries, similar CB and angio-embolization rates, less orthopedic pelvic surgeries, shorter lengths of stay and higher mortality. After propensity matching, orthopedic pelvic surgery rates remained lower (8% vs 19%, P < 0.001), hospital length of stay shorter, and mortality higher (13% vs 4%, P < 0.001) in geriatric patients. Out of 89 patients with CB, 45 (51%) were embolized. After propensity matching, patients with CB compared to without CB had more pelvic angiography (71% vs 12%, P < 0.001), higher embolization rates (64% vs 22%, P = 0.02) and comparable mortality. CONCLUSION: Half of the patients with PF had concomitant co-injuries, including abdominal co-injuries in 17%. Similarly injured geriatric patients had higher mortality. Half of the patients with CB required an embolization.

Investigating the Impact of Blunt Force Trauma: A Probabilistic Study of Behind Armor Blunt Trauma Risk.

Evaluating Behind Armor Blunt Trauma (BABT) is a critical step in preventing non-penetrating injuries in military personnel, which can result from the transfer of kinetic energy from projectiles impacting body armor. While the current NIJ Standard-0101.06 standard focuses on preventing excessive armor backface deformation, this standard does not account for the variability in impact location, thorax organ and tissue material properties, and injury thresholds in order to assess potential injury. To address this gap, Finite Element (FE) human body models (HBMs) have been employed to investigate variability in BABT impact conditions by recreating specific cases from survivor databases and generating injury risk curves. However, these deterministic analyses predominantly use models representing the 50th percentile male and do not investigate the uncertainty and variability inherent within the system, thus limiting the generalizability of investigating injury risk over a diverse military population. The DoD-funded I-PREDICT Future Naval Capability (FNC) introduces a probabilistic HBM, which considers uncertainty and variability in tissue material and failure properties, anthropometry, and external loading conditions. This study utilizes the I-PREDICT HBM for BABT simulations for three thoracic impact locations-liver, heart, and lower abdomen. A probabilistic analysis of tissue-level strains resulting from a BABT event is used to determine the probability of achieving a Military Combat Incapacitation Scale (MCIS) for organ-level injuries and the New Injury Severity Score (NISS) is employed for whole-body injury risk evaluations. Organ-level MCIS metrics show that impact at the heart can cause severe injuries to the heart and spleen, whereas impact to the liver can cause rib fractures and major lacerations in the liver. Impact at the lower abdomen can cause lacerations in the spleen. Simulation results indicate that, under current protection standards, the whole-body risk of injury varies between 6 and 98% based on impact location, with the impact at the heart being the most severe, followed by impact at the liver and the lower abdomen. These results suggest that the current body armor protection standards might result in severe injuries in specific locations, but no injuries in others.

Proper hepatic artery transection followed by blunt abdominal trauma: A case report and review of literature.

Abdominal vascular injuries, especially in the celiac trunk, are uncommon in blunt trauma, yet their life-threatening nature necessitates rapid surgical interventions to control possible massive bleedings. Damage control surgery principles may aid management. It is crucial to thoroughly assess all trauma patients, even in instances of initial normal physical examinations.

Unsafe Practices of Motorcycle Riders in El Petén, Guatemala: A Community Observational Study and a Retrospective Institutional Review.

INTRODUCTION: Outcomes from trauma at the major referral hospital [Hospital Nacional de San Benito (HNSB)] in El Petén, Guatemala, have not been analyzed. Empirical evidence demonstrated a high number of motorcycle accidents (MAs). We hypothesized a large incidence of head trauma with poor outcomes in MAs compared to all other forms of blunt trauma. METHODS: Our hypothesis was tested by performing a community observational study and a retrospective chart review in El Petén, Guatemala. An independent observer catalogued 100 motorcycle riders on the streets of El Petén for riding practices as well as helmet utilization. HNSB does not have electronic medical records. For this study, we performed a retrospective chart review of randomly selected nonconsecutive trauma admission at HNSB between March 2018 and June 2023. Blunt trauma was compared between MAs versus all others. Variables were examined by parametric and nonparametric tests as well as contingency table analyses. RESULTS: Most motorcycles riders involved multiple individuals (2.61 ± 0.79/motorcycle). Seventy riders included children (median = 1.0 [Q1-Q3 range = 1.0-3.0]/motorcycle). Overall, only three riders were wearing helmets. Forty-one were women. Of patients presenting to HNSB with trauma, 91 charts were reviewed (33.0 [20.0-37.0] y old; male 89%), 76.7% were blunt, and 23.3% were penetrating trauma. Within blunt trauma, 57.1% were MAs versus 42.9% all others; P = 0.13. MAs were younger (29.5 [20.0-37.0] versus 34.0 [21.8-45.8] y old; P < 0.05) and of similar gender (male 82.5% versus 96.6%; P = 0.1). More MAs had a computed tomography (70.0% versus 30.0%; P < 0.01) and they were more likely to present with head trauma (72.5% versus 46.7%; P = 0.04) but similar Glasgow Coma Scale (15.0 [13.5-15.0] versus 15.0 [12.5-15.0]; P = 0.7). MAs were less likely to require surgical intervention (37.5% versus 56.7%; P = 0.05) but had similar hospital length of stay (4.0 [2-6] versus 4.0 [2-10.5] d; P = 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Unsafe motorcycle practices in El Petén are staggering. Most trauma at HNSB is blunt, and likely from MAs. More patients with MAs presented with head trauma. However, severe trauma might be transferred to higher level hospitals or mortality might occur on scene, which will need further investigations. Assessment of mortality from trauma admissions is ongoing. These findings should lead to enforcement of safe motorcycle practices in El Petén, Guatemala.

Standardizing quality utilization of interventional radiology treatments of blunt splenic injury: SQUIRTS study.

OBJECTIVES: Nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injury (BSI) is well accepted in appropriate patients. Splenic artery embolization (SAE) in higher-grade injuries likely plays an important role in increasing the success of NOM. We previously implemented a protocol requiring referral of all BSI grades III-V undergoing NOM for SAE. It is unknown the risk of complications as well as longitudinal outcomes. We aimed to examine the splenic salvage rate and safety profile of the protocol. We hypothesized the splenic salvage rate would be high and complications would be low. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed at our Level 1 trauma center over a 9-year period. Injury characteristics and outcomes in patients sustaining BSI grades III-V were collected. Outcomes were compared for NOM on protocol (SAE) and off protocol (no angiography or angiography but no embolization). Complications for angiographies were examined. RESULTS: Between January 2010 and February 2019, 570 patients had grade III-V BSI. NOM was attempted in 359 (63 %) with overall salvage rate of 91 % (328). Of these, 305 were on protocol while 54 were off protocol (41 no angiography and 13 angiography but no SAE). During the study period, for every grade of injury a pattern was seen of a higher salvage rate in the on-protocol group when compared to the off-protocol group (Grade III, 97 %(181/187) vs. 89 %(32/36), Grade IV, 91 %(98/108) vs. 69 %(9/13) and Grade V, 80 %(8/10 vs. 0 %(0/5). The overall salvage rate was 94 %(287) on protocol vs. 76 %(41) off protocol (p < 0.001, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test). Complications occurred in only 8 of the 318 who underwent angiography (2 %). These included 5 access complications and 3 abscesses. CONCLUSION: The use of a protocol requiring routine splenic artery embolization for all high-grade spleen injuries slated for non-operative management is safe with a very low complication rate. NOM with splenic angioembolization failure rate is improved as compared to non-SAE patients' at all higher grades of injury. Thus, SAE for all hemodynamically stable patients of all high-grade types should be considered as a primary form of therapy for such injuries.

Coronary artery intramural hematoma causing myocardial infarction mimicking pseudoaneurysm or dissection from trauma: A case report.

Blunt chest trauma caused ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Diagnosis of intramural hematoma (IMH) using computed tomography was confirmed using electrocardiography, cardiac marker tests, and subsequent coronary angiography. After conservative treatment, the hematoma was completely resolved 1 year later. Differentiating IMH from other arterial injuries is critical for appropriate management.

Pediatric Carotid Injury after Blunt Trauma and the Necessity of CT and CTA-A Narrative Literature Review.

Background: Blunt carotid injury (BCI) in pediatric trauma is quite rare. Due to the low number of cases, only a few reports and studies have been conducted on this topic. This review will discuss how frequent BCI/blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) on pediatric patients after blunt trauma is, what routine diagnostics looks like, if a computed tomography (CT)/computed tomography angiography (CTA) scan on pediatric patients after blunt trauma is always necessary and if there are any negative health effects. Methods: This narrative literature review includes reviews, systematic reviews, case reports and original studies in the English language between 1999 and 2020 that deal with pediatric blunt trauma and the diagnostics of BCI and BCVI. Furthermore, publications on the risk of radiation exposure for children were included in this study. For literature research, Medline (PubMed) and the Cochrane library were used. Results: Pediatric BCI/BCVI shows an overall incidence between 0.03 and 0.5% of confirmed BCI/BCVI cases due to pediatric blunt trauma. In total, 1.1-3.5% of pediatric blunt trauma patients underwent CTA to detect BCI/BCVI. Only 0.17-1.2% of all CTA scans show a positive diagnosis for BCI/BCVI. In children, the median volume CT dose index on a non-contrast head CT is 33 milligrays (mGy), whereas a computed tomography angiography needs at least 138 mGy. A cumulative dose of about 50 mGy almost triples the risk of leukemia, and a cumulative dose of about 60 mGy triples the risk of brain cancer. Conclusions: Given that a BCI/BCVI could have extensive neurological consequences for children, it is necessary to evaluate routine pediatric diagnostics after blunt trauma. CT and CTA are mostly used in routine BCI/BCVI diagnostics. However, since radiation exposure in children should be as low as reasonably achievable, it should be asked if other diagnostic methods could be used to identify risk groups. Trauma guidelines and clinical scores like the McGovern score are established BCI/BCVI screening options, as well as duplex ultrasound.

Clinical Outcomes of Splenic Artery Embolization Versus Splenectomy in the Management of Hemodynamically Stable High-Grade Blunt Splenic Injuries: A National Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to compare the outcomes of splenic artery embolization (SAE) versus splenectomy in adult trauma patients with high-grade blunt splenic injuries. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database (2017-2021) compared SAE versus splenectomy in adults with blunt high-grade splenic injuries (grade ≥ IV). Patients were stratified first by hemodynamic status then splenic injury grade. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU-LOS), and transfusion requirements at four and 24 h from arrival. RESULTS: Three thousand one hundred nine hemodynamically stable patients were analyzed, with 2975 (95.7%) undergoing splenectomy and 134 (4.3%) with SAE. One thousand eight hundred sixty five patients had grade IV splenic injuries, and 1244 had grade V. Patients managed with SAE had 72% lower odds of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.28; P = 0.002), significantly shorter ICU-LOS (7 versus 9 d, 95%, P = 0.028), and received a mean of 1606 mL less packed red blood cells at four h compared to those undergoing splenectomy. Patients with grade IV or V injuries both had significantly lower odds of mortality (IV: OR 0.153, P < 0.001; V: OR 0.365, P = 0.041) and were given less packed red blood cells within four h when treated with SAE (2056 mL versus 405 mL, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SAE may be a safer and more effective management approach for hemodynamically stable adult trauma patients with high-grade blunt splenic injuries, as demonstrated by its association with significantly lower rates of in-hospital mortality, shorter ICU-LOS, and lower transfusion requirements compared to splenectomy.

Comparison of Patterns and Demographics of Isolated Traumatic Mandibular Fracture Between Incarcerated and General Populations.

Introduction The management of maxillofacial trauma can be challenging in different unique clinical presentations. While maxillofacial fractures vary in location based on the mechanism of injury, the mandibular fracture is noted to be one of the most common facial fractures. The objective of this study was to explore the differences in injury patterns, outcomes, and demographics of isolated traumatic mandibular fractures between incarcerated and general populations. Methods This retrospective study analyzed consecutive patients presenting for trauma care from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2020, at the Arrowhead Regional Medical Center (ARMC). Patients 18 years and older were included in this study. Patients diagnosed with mandibular fracture as the primary diagnosis at admission and discharge were identified using the International Classification of Disease, Ninth and Tenth Revision (ICD-9, ICD-10) Code. Patient demographics were extracted from their electronic medical records and included race, marital status, and insurance status. Results A total of 1080 patients with confirmed mandibular fractures were included in the final analysis. Among these patients, 87.5% (n=945) were males, 40% (n=432) of the patients were Hispanic, and the average age was 31.55 years old. The most common mechanism of injury was blunt trauma secondary to assault. Compared to the general population with mandibular fracture, the incarcerated patients with mandibular fracture were more likely to be males (96.1% vs 86.1% for incarcerated population vs. general population respectively, p=0.0005). No other variables were statistically different between these two groups. Conclusion The evidence from this study suggests that the patterns, outcomes, and demographics of mandibular fracture in both incarcerated and general populations are similar.

Delayed presentation of splenic artery pseudoaneurysm: A critical outcome of blunt abdominal trauma; A case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Blunt abdominal trauma is one of the most common reasons for emergency department visits, and spleen and splenic vasculature is involved variably in those cases. Splenic artery pseudoaneurysm formation is one complication with potentially devastating consequences. Early detection and management are of paramount importance given its potential fatality. Management includes open repair with or without splenectomy, and endovascular approach. The minimally invasive endovascular treatment offers earlier recovery, preserved splenic function, and positive outcomes. We report a case of delayed presentation of a large splenic artery pseudoaneurysm after blunt abdominal trauma, managed using endovascular intervention. CASE PRESENTATION: A 45-year-old male presented 10 days after being involved in a pedestrian accident with blunt abdominal trauma resulting in a large splenic artery pseudoaneurysm. After multidisciplinary discussion, the decision was to take him for endovascular treatment. The patient recovered very well and was discharged two days later and followed up in an outpatient setting. Over a year, he became symptom free, and demonstrated radiological finding of shrinking pseudoaneurysm. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Pseudoaneurysms of visceral arteries are repaired regardless of their size per society of vascular surgery guidelines. Larger ones are at higher risk of rupture and are associated with high mortality. When discovered, treatment plans should be readily discussed, and undertaken. In our case, the patient had a 6.5 cm splenic artery pseudoaneurysm, and a multidisciplinary meeting was conducted and concluded that endovascular treatment would be the best modality to start with, with surgical option as a backup in a hybrid room setting. CONCLUSION: Blunt abdominal trauma can present with overt symptoms of internal organ injury; however, some might be missed and need high index of suspicion and therefore further testing and imaging. Splenic artery pseudoaneurysms can expand and rupture in delayed presentation, early detection and management is of paramount importance. Endovascular treatment represents an excellent modality, with minimal invasive nature, faster recovery, and early return to daily activity with preserved splenic function.

Endovascular salvage of occluded renal artery after >15 hours of ischemic time.

In severe cases of acute traumatic injury to the kidney, immediate intervention is necessary to avoid irreversible ischemic damage. This case involves a 24-year-old woman who presented with signs of right renal devascularization after a high-speed all-terrain vehicle accident. Due to transport from an outside hospital, there was >15-hour delay before evaluation by vascular surgery. Considering her young age, we elected to salvage this patient's kidney via percutaneous endovascular stenting to mitigate any further prolongation of renal artery occlusion and prevent long-term sequelae. After intervention, her acute kidney injury resolved, and her creatinine levels normalized. As illustrated in this case, recovery of the renal parenchyma remains a possibility despite an extended warm ischemic time, providing evidence for future young patients to be considered for renal salvage.

Traumatic Abdominal Wall Hernia: Management Using a Standardized Approach.

Traumatic abdominal wall hernias are a rare complication of high energy blunt trauma. There exist several studies evaluating and outlining potential management options but still no generalized consensus on management. This series was meant to evaluate the diagnosis and management of traumatic abdominal wall hernias. A prospectively maintained database was used to identify patients with TAWH from 2021 to 2022. The primary outcome was operative management. Secondary outcomes included: time to diagnosis and post-operative outcomes. Of the 19 patients in this case series, 100% (n = 19/19) were secondary to blunt trauma with a mean ISS of 21. Exploratory laparotomy was performed in 17 cases. 14 cases had concomitant traumatic injuries to visceral structures. Complications were found in nearly half of the patients with 3 experiencing wound dehiscence. Future studies should be aimed at standardizing management approach taking into account nature of the mechanism and concomitant injuries.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy for trauma in an adolescent female with complex pancreatic and duodenal injuries: Case report and review of the literature.

Background: We present a successful staged surgical repair of an adolescent who sustained a high grade combined pancreaticoduodenal injury following a high-speed motor vehicle collision. Methods: We discuss our case as well as provide a thorough literature review made on databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase. Summary: A fifteen-year-old female presented after a motor vehicle collision with abdominal pain and imaging suggestive of pancreatic and duodenal injuries. Emergent exploratory laparotomy confirmed a transection of the pancreatic neck in addition to disruption of the second portion of the duodenum. She sustained other injuries including an injury to the portal vein and a right colonic perforation. A damage control strategy was employed, and the patient underwent duodenal repair, wide drainage of the pancreatic injury, primary portal vein repair, right hemicolectomy, and temporary abdominal closure using negative pressure wound dressing placement. She remained stable overnight in the ICU and was taken back to the operating room for a pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy with a hepatobiliary surgeon the following afternoon. The patient required additional surgery for fixation of an unstable vertebral fracture but was discharged to inpatient rehab within two weeks of presentation. She did not require TPN, and the only long-term sequelae have been admissions for acute uncomplicated pancreatitis that have been treated medically. Conclusion: Combined pancreatic and duodenal injury in the pediatric population is uncommon. We discuss our case of a patient requiring a pancreaticoduodenectomy. Despite postoperative pancreatitis and limited information in this field, we believe we provided the optimal surgical care, and this is a potential area for future investigation.

An Abdominal Seat Belt Sign is Associated With Similar Incidence of Hollow Viscus Injury but Increased In-Hospital Mortality in Older Adult Trauma Patients: A PCSA Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: The abdominal seat belt sign (SBS) is associated with an increased risk of hollow viscus injury (HVI). Older age is associated with worse outcomes in trauma patients. Thus, older trauma patients ≥65 years of age (OTPs) may be at an increased risk of HVI with abdominal SBS. Therefore, we hypothesized an increased incidence of HVI and mortality for OTPs vs younger trauma patients (YTPs) with abdominal SBS. STUDY DESIGN: This post hoc analysis of a multi-institutional, prospective, observational study (8/2020-10/2021) included patients >18 years old with an abdominal SBS who underwent abdominal computed tomography (CT) imaging. Older trauma patients were compared to YTPs (18-64 years old) with bivariate analyses. RESULTS: Of the 754 patients included in this study from nine level-1 trauma centers, there were 110 (14.6%) OTPs and 644 (85.4%) YTPs. Older trauma patients were older (mean 75.3 vs 35.8 years old, P < .01) and had a higher mean Injury Severity Score (10.8 vs 9.0, P = .02). However, YTPs had an increased abdominal abbreviated-injury scale score (2.01 vs 1.63, P = .02). On CT imaging, OTPs less commonly had intraabdominal free fluid (21.7% vs 11.9%, P = .02) despite a similar rate of abdominal soft tissue contusion (P > .05). Older trauma patients also had a statistically similar rate of HVI vs YTPs (5.5% vs 9.8%, P = .15). Despite this, OTPs had increased mortality (5.5% vs 1.1%, P < .01) and length of stay (LOS) (5.9 vs 4.9 days P < .01). CONCLUSION: Despite a similar rate of HVI, OTPs with an abdominal SBS had an increased rate of mortality and LOS. This suggests the need for heightened vigilance when caring for OTPs with abdominal SBS.

Nationwide Trends in Utilization of Minimally Invasive Techniques for Blunt Abdominal Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing use of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques for trauma, limited large-scale studies have evaluated trends, outcomes, and resource utilization at centers that utilize MIS modalities for blunt abdominal trauma. METHODS: Operative adult admissions after blunt assault, falls, or vehicular collisions were tabulated from the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample. Patients who received diagnostic laparoscopy or other laparoscopic and robotic intervention were classified as MIS. Institutions with at least one MIS trauma operation in a year were defined as an MIS Performing Institution (MPI; rest: non-MPI). The primary endpoint was mortality, with secondary outcomes of reoperation, complication, postoperative length of stay (LOS), and hospitalization costs. Mixed regression models were used to determine the association of MPI status on the outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Throughout the study period, the proportion of MIS operations and MPI significantly increased from 22.6 to 29.8% and 45.9 to 58.8%, respectively. Of an estimated 77,480 patients, 66.7% underwent care at MPI. After adjustment, MPI status was not associated with increased odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] [.96,1.24]), reoperation (AOR 1.02, CI [.87,1.19]), or any of the tabulated complications. There was additionally no difference in adjusted LOS (ß-.18, CI [-.85, +.49]) or costs (ß+$1600, CI [-1600, +4800]), between MPI and non-MPI. DISCUSSION: The use of MIS operations in blunt abdominal trauma has significantly increased, with performing centers experiencing no difference in mortality or resource utilization. Prospectively collected data on outcomes following MIS trauma surgery is necessary to elucidate appropriate applications.

Follow-up computed tomography and unexpected hemostasis in non-operative management of pediatric blunt liver and spleen injury.

PURPOSE: While follow-up CT and prophylactic embolization with angiography are often conducted during non-operative management (NOM) for BLSI, particularly in a high-grade injury, the utility of early repeated CT for preventing unexpected hemorrhage remains unclear. This study aimed to elucidate whether early follow-up computerized tomography (CT) within 7 days after admission would decrease unexpected hemostatic procedures on pediatric blunt liver and spleen injury (BLSI). METHODS: A post-hoc analysis of a multicenter observational cohort study on pediatric patients with BLSI (2008-2019) was conducted on those who underwent NOM, in whom the timing of follow-up CT were decided by treating physicians. The incidence of unexpected hemostatic procedure (laparotomy and/or emergency angiography for ruptured pseudoaneurysm) and complications related to BLSI were compared between patients with and without early follow-up CT within 7 days. Inverse probability weighting with propensity scores adjusted patient demographics, comorbidities, mechanism and severity of injury, initial resuscitation, and institutional characteristics. RESULTS: Among 1320 included patients, 552 underwent early follow-up CT. Approximately 25% of patients underwent angiography on the day of admission. The incidence of unexpected hemostasis was similar between patients with and without early repeat CT (8 [1.4%] vs. 6 [0.8%]; adjusted OR, 1.44 [0.62-3.34]; p = 0.40). Patients with repeat CT scans more frequently underwent multiple angiographies (OR, 2.79 [1.32-5.88]) and had more complications related to BLSI, particularly bile leak (OR, 1.73 [1.04-2.87]). CONCLUSION: Follow-up CT scans within 7 days was not associated with reduced unexpected hemostasis in NOM for pediatric BLSI.

Gas Gangrene of the Spleen Caused by Clostridium perfringens After Mild Blunt Trauma.

Splenic gas gangrene caused by Clostridium perfringens is rare. A 73-year-old woman was referred to our hospital because of fatigue, dyspnea, and left hypochondrial pain. She had a history of blunt trauma to the left abdomen eight days ago. She presented with hypoxemia and a high inflammatory response on blood tests. A CT showed left pleural effusion and gas in the spleen. She was treated with antimicrobials and underwent splenectomy. C. perfringens was identified from blood and intraoperative ascites cultures. She recovered and was discharged on day 34 of hospitalization. As C. perfringens is part of the normal gut microbiota and can translocate to other parts of the body, this bacterium should be considered a splenic abscess pathogen when an intracorporeal anaerobic environment is suspected.

Injury Risk Functions for the Midsized Male Wrist and Elbow as a Result of Behind Shield Blunt Trauma.

Ballistic shields protect users from a variety of threats, including projectiles. Shield back-face deformation (BFD) is the result of the shield deflecting or absorbing a projectile and deforming toward the user. Back-face deformation can result in localized blunt loading to the upper extremity, where the shield is supported by the user. Two vulnerable locations along the upper extremity were investigated-the wrist and elbow-on eight postmortem human subjects (PMHS) using a pneumatic impacting apparatus for investigating the fracture threshold as a result of behind shield blunt trauma (BSBT). Impacting parameters were established by subjecting an augmented WorldSID anthropomorphic test device (ATD) positioned behind a ballistic shield to ballistic impacts. These data were used to form the impact parameters applied to PMHS, where the wrist most frequently fractured at the distal radius and the elbow most frequently fractured at the radial head. The fracture threshold for the wrist was 5663±1386 N (mean±standard deviation), higher than the elbow at 4765±894 N (though not significantly, p = 0.15). The failure impact velocity for wrist impacts was 17.7±2.1 m/s, while for the elbow, the failure impact velocity was 19.5±0.9 m/s. An approximate 10% risk of fracture threshold was identified on the modified WorldSID ATD (no flesh analogue included) to inform future protective standards.

Immediate Operative Trauma Assessment Score: A Simple and Reliable Predictor of Mortality in Trauma Patients Undergoing Urgent/Emergent Surgery.

Objective: Many current trauma mortality prediction tools are either too intricate or rely on data not readily available during a trauma patient's initial evaluation. Moreover, none are tailored to those necessitating urgent or emergent surgery. Our objective was to design a practical, user-friendly scoring tool using immediately available variables, and then compare its efficacy to the widely-known Revised Trauma Score (RTS). Methods: The adult 2017-2021 Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database was queried to identify patients ≥18 years old undergoing any urgent/emergent operation (direct from Emergency Department to operating room). Patients were divided into derivation and validation groups. A three-step methodology was used. First, multiple logistic regression models were created to determine risk of death using only variables available upon arrival. Second, the weighted average and relative impact of each independent predictor was used to derive an easily calculated Immediate Operative Trauma Assessment Score (IOTAS). We then validated IOTAS using AUROC and compared it to RTS. Results: From 249 208 patients in the derivation-set, 14 635 (5.9%) died. Age ≥65, Glasgow Coma Scale score <9, hypotension (SBP <90 mmHg), and tachycardia (>120/min) on arrival were identified as independent predictors for mortality. Using these, the IOTAS was structured, offering scores between 0-8. The AUROC for this was .88. A clear escalation in mortality was observed across scores: from 4.4% at score 1 to 60.5% at score 8. For the validation set (250 182 patients; mortality rate 5.8%), the AUROC remained consistent at .87, surpassing RTS's AUROC of .83. Conclusion: IOTAS is a novel, accurate, and now validated tool that is intuitive and efficient in predicting mortality for trauma patients requiring urgent or emergent surgeries. It outperforms RTS, and thereby may help guide clinicians when determining the best course of action in patient management as well as counseling patients and their families.