Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc ; 62(1): 1-7, 2024 Jan 08.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39110839

RESUMO

Background: Primary breast tumors with neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation are a heterogeneous tumor group with diversity of biological behavior, with poorly defined prevalence and prognosis. Objective: To evaluate the chromogranin, synaptophysin, CD56, INSM1 markers expression prevalence and the association between NE differentiation and tumor molecular type. Material and methods: Observational, cross-sectional study which included 110 breast tissue samples with primary invasive carcinoma. Immunohistochemistry was performed for chromogranin, synaptophysin, CD56 and INMS1 markers. NE differentiation was considered with 10-90% positive cells, and NE tumor with > 90% positive cells. Results: 26.3% showed neuroendocrine differentiation. Out of these, 48.2% were luminal-A type, 24.1% luminal-B, 11.5% HER2neu, 17.2% triple-negative; 1.8% were NE tumors. Tumors were marker positive, and out of these to chromogranin in 24.5%, synaptophysin in 28.2%, CD56 in 2.7%, INSM1 in 16.4%. Synaptophysin was expressed in 17.3% luminal-A type, 6.4% luminal-B, 0.9% HER2neu, 3.6% triple-negative. NE differentiation showed association with synaptophysin expression (r = 0.586, p = 0.0001). Conclusion: The NE differentiation prevalence was 26.3% in primary invasive breast cancers, with luminal-A molecular type predominance.


Introducción: los tumores primarios de mama con diferenciación neuroendócrina (NEBC por sus siglas en inglés) son un grupo heterogéneo de tumores con diversidad de comportamiento biológico, con prevalencia y pronóstico poco definido. Objetivo: evaluar la prevalencia de la expresión los marcadores cromogranina, sinaptofisina, CD56, INSM1 y la asociación entre la diferenciación neuroendócrina y el tipo molecular del tumor. Material y métodos: estudio observacional, transversal que incluyó 110 muestras de tejido mamario con carcinoma invasor primario. Se realizó inmunohistoquímica para los marcadores cromogranina, sinaptofisina, CD56 y INMS1. La presencia 10-90% de células positivas se consideró diferenciación neuroendócrina y tumor neuroendócrino con > 90% de células positivas. Resultados: el 26.3% mostró diferenciación neuroendócrina. De estos, 48.2% fueron tipo luminal-A, 24.1% luminal-B, 11.5% HER2neu y 17.2% triple-negativo; 1.8% resultaron tumores neuroendócrinos. Los tumores presentaron marcadores positivos y de estos, 24.5% fueron a cromogranina, 28.2% a sinaptofisina, 2.7% a CD56 y 16.4% a INSM1. La sinaptofisina se expresó en 17.3% del tipo luminal-A, 6.4% luminal-B, 0.9% HER2neu, 3.6% triple-negativo. La diferenciación neuroendócrina mostró asociación con la expresión de sinaptofisina (r = 0.586, p = 0.0001). Conclusión: la prevalencia de la diferenciación neuroendócrina fue del 26.3% en los cánceres invasores primarios de mama, con predominio en el tipo molecular luminal-A.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais , Sinaptofisina , Humanos , Feminino , Estudos Transversais , Biomarcadores Tumorais/metabolismo , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Sinaptofisina/metabolismo , Idoso , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/metabolismo , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Antígeno CD56/metabolismo , Imuno-Histoquímica , Proteínas Repressoras/metabolismo , Cromograninas/metabolismo , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais
2.
Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992, Impr.) ; Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992, Impr.);69(6): e20220992, 2023. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1440885

RESUMO

SUMMARY OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate CD56 immunostaining in the stroma of benign and malignant ovarian epithelial neoplasms and associate the CD56 immunostaining with prognostic factors and survival in ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients with ovarian epithelial neoplasia (n=77) were studied with a prospective cohort. The CD56 immunostaining was evaluated in the peritumoral stroma. Two groups were evaluated: benign ovarian neoplasms (n=40) and malignant ovarian neoplasms (n=37). Data were recorded for histological type and grade, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging, molecular subtype, and lymph node metastases. Fisher's exact test and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used, with a significance level of ≤0.05. RESULTS: We found greater CD56 stromal immunostaining in malignant neoplasms when compared to the group of benign neoplasms (p=0.00001). There was no significant difference in relation to the prognostic factors and survival. CONCLUSION: Malignant ovarian neoplasms showed higher stromal CD56 immunostaining. As the prognostic value of natural killer in ovarian cancer is controversial, knowing the specific function of each cell present both in the tumor tissue and systemically may help guide successful immunotherapies in the near future.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA