Drug delivery in leptomeningeal disease: Navigating barriers and beyond.

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) refers to the infiltration of cancer cells into the leptomeningeal compartment. Leptomeninges are the two membranous layers, called the arachnoid membrane and pia mater. The diffuse nature of LMD poses a challenge to its effective diagnosis and successful management. Furthermore, the predominant phenotype; solid masses or freely floating cells, has altering implications on the effectiveness of drug delivery systems. The standard of care is the intrathecal delivery of chemotherapy drugs but it is associated with increased instances of treatment-related complications, low patient compliance, and suboptimal drug distribution. An alternative involves administering the drugs systemically, after which they must traverse fluid barriers to arrive at their destination within the leptomeningeal space. However, this route is known to cause off-target effects as well as produce subtherapeutic drug concentrations at the target site within the central nervous system. The development of new drug delivery systems such as liposomal cytarabine has improved drug delivery in leptomeningeal metastatic disease, but much still needs to be done to effectively target this challenging condition. In this review, we discuss about the anatomy of leptomeninges relevant for drug penetration, the conventional and advanced drug delivery methods for LMD. We also discuss the future directions being set by different clinical trials.

Central nervous system metastases in breast cancer patients with germline BRCA pathogenic variants compared to non-carriers: a matched-pair analysis.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is a common cause for central nervous system (CNS) metastasis, resulting in a significant reduction in overall survival. Germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1/2 are the most common genetic risk factor for breast cancer, associated with poor prognostic factors. This study sought to explore the patterns and outcome of CNS metastases in breast cancer patients with germline PVs in BRCA1/2 genes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 75 breast cancer patients with known BRCA1/2 mutation status, who were diagnosed with CNS metastases in 2006-2021. Histopathology, characteristics of CNS disease, treatments, and survival were compared between BRCA1/2 carriers (n = 25) and non-carriers (n = 50), using propensity score matching (1:2 ratio) to control for the possible influence of tumor receptor status (ER, PR, HER2) and patient age. Pearson chi-square or Fisher exact test and Kaplan-Meier survival curves with log-rank test were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Patients with PVs in BRCA1/2 had more high-grade tumors (88% vs. 68%, P = 0.060), were younger at CNS disease diagnosis (median 46.69 vs. 55.02 years, P = 0.003) and had better ECOG performance status (ECOG PS 0 in 20% vs. 2%, P = 0.033), but without significant differences in systemic or CNS-directed treatment approaches. BRCA1/2 mutation was associated with a higher rate of temporal lobe involvement (52% vs. 26%, P = 0.026) and leptomeningeal spread (40% vs. 20%, P = 0.020). Survival after diagnosis of CNS disease was shorter (median 8.03 vs. 28.36 months, P < 0.0001), with no significant differences in time to development of CNS metastases or overall-survival. CONCLUSION: Patients with CNS metastatic breast cancer and PVs in BRCA1/2 showed a higher rate of leptomeningeal and temporal lobe involvement, and a shorter survival with CNS disease. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study suggesting an exclusive impact of germline BRCA1/2 mutations in CNS metastatic breast cancer.

Characterization of pediatric non-hematopoietic tumor metastases to the central nervous system: A single institution review.

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases represent a small portion of pediatric CNS neoplasms and data surrounding this condition with high morbidity is scarce. Single institutional archival institutional pathology records between 1999 and 2022 were searched for patients over 21 years old and younger with CNS, dura, cranial nerve, CSF, or leptomeningeal metastases; 41 cases were identified. We documented primary tumor types and locations, metastasis locations, types of invasion (direct extension vs distant metastasis), times from imaging or pathologic diagnosis to CNS involvement, and outcomes. Distant metastasis was the most common mechanism of metastasis (n = 32, 78%). Interval times to CNS metastasis varied by both tumor type and primary tumor location. In this cohort, osteosarcoma portended the shortest survival following CNS metastasis. This study highlights the diverse mechanisms and locations of CNS involvement in pediatric CNS metastases and illuminates a need for varied monitoring strategies when considering primary tumor type and anatomic location.

Successful application of lorlatinib in a 23-year-old patient with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive lung cancer and multiple brain metastases.

BACKGROUND: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive lung cancer has a better long-term prognosis with ALK-inhibitor than other lung cancers. However, resistance to ALK-inhibitors and the control of metastases in the central nervous system (CNS) remain to be a challenge in the management of ALK-positive lung cancer. CASE: We present the case of a 23-year-old man who developed multiple brain metastases while receiving alectinib treatment for ALK-positive lung cancer. After 3 months of lorlatinib initiation, brain metastases disappeared, and complete response (CR) was maintained. CONCLUSION: While lorlatinib can be used as first line therapy, this drug may be considered as second line or later option for patients with multiple brain metastases if the patient has already been treated with other ALK-inhibitors since lorlatinib is thought to have good CNS penetration. This treatment option should be verified by further research.

A Phase 2 Single-Arm Study of Osimertinib for Radiotherapy-Naive Central Nervous System Metastasis NSCLC: Results for the First-Line Cohort of the OCEAN Study (LOGIK 1603/WJOG 9116L).

Introduction: Osimertinib may be effective in treating central nervous system (CNS) metastasis, but its efficacy in treating radiation therapy (RT)-naive metastasis is unclear. The OCEAN study assessed the efficacy of osimertinib against RT-naive CNS metastasis in patients previously treated (T790M cohort) and untreated patients (first-line cohort) with EGFR mutation. Here, we report the results of the first-line cohort. Methods: Previously untreated patients with RT-naive CNS metastasis and EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC were treated with osimertinib. The brain metastasis response rate (BMRR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival in the first-line cohort were secondary end points. Results: A total of 26 patients were enrolled in the study between September 2019 and July 2020. The median age was 72.0 years with 80.8% female. There were 20 patients who had multiple CNS metastases. BMRR assessed by PAREXEL criteria was 76.9% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 63.3%-90.5%), BMRR assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors was 76.9% (95% CI: 54.0%-99.8%), and median PFS of CNS metastasis was 22.0 months (95% CI: 9.7 mo-not reached). The overall response rate was 64.0% (95% CI: 45.2%-82.8%), median PFS was 11.5 months (95% CI: 6.9 mo-not reached), and median survival time was 23.7 months (95% CI: 16.5 mo-not reached). Paronychia and increased creatinine level were the most frequent nonhematological toxicities observed in 13 patients (50%). Grade three and higher adverse events were less than 10%, and there were no treatment-related deaths. Pneumonitis was observed in five patients (19.2%). Conclusions: These results suggest that osimertinib is effective in untreated patients with RT-naive asymptomatic CNS metastasis in a clinical practice first-line setting. Trial registration: UMIN identifier: UMIN000024218. jRCT identifier: jRCTs071180017.

Evolution of the Management of Brain Metastases: A Bibliometric Analysis.

A systematic review of the published literature was conducted to analyze the management evolution of brain metastases from different cancers. Using the keywords "brain metastasis", "brain metastases", "CNS metastasis", "CNS metastases", "phase III" AND/OR "Randomized Controlled Trial" (RCT), relevant articles were searched for on the SCOPUS database. A total of 1986 articles were retrieved, published over a 45-year period (1977-2022). Relevant articles were defined as clinical studies describing the treatment or prevention of brain metastases from any cancer. Articles on imaging, quality of life, cognitive impairment after treatment, or primary brain tumors were excluded. After a secondary analysis, reviewing the abstracts and/or full texts, 724 articles were found to be relevant. Publications significantly increased in the last 10 years. A total of 252 articles (34.8%) were published in 12 core journals, receiving 50% of the citations. The number of publications in Frontiers in Oncology, BMC Cancer, and Radiotherapy and Oncology have increased considerably over the last few years. There were 111 randomized controlled trials, 128 review articles, and 63 meta-analyses. Most randomized trials reported on brain metastases management from unselected tumors (49), lung cancer (47), or breast cancer (11). In the last 5 years (2017 to 2022), management of brain metastasis has moved on from WBRT, the use of chemotherapy, and radio-sensitization to three directions. First, Radiosurgery or Radiotherapy (SRS/SRT), or hippocampal-sparing WBRT is employed to reduce radiation toxicity. Second, it has moved to the use of novel agents, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and third, to the use of molecularly directed therapy such as TKIs, in asymptomatic low volume metastasis, obviating the need for WBRT.

Efficacy, safety and dose selection of AZD3759 in patients with untreated EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer and central nervous system metastases in China (CTONG1702-Arm 8): a multi-center, single-arm, phase 2 trial.

Background: Central nervous system (CNS) metastases is inevitable for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). AZD3759 is a novel EGFR-TKI with impressive CNS penetration. Methods: We initiated a phase 2, multi-center, umbrella trial (CTONG1702, NCT03574402). The eighth arm assessed the efficacy and safety of AZD3759 in untreated EGFR-mutated NSCLC with CNS metastases. The primary objective was the objective response rate (ORR). Simon's minimax two-stage design was used to calculate the sample size. Dose optimal selection was performed using 200- and 300-mg bid cohorts. Findings: Between Oct 18, 2018 and Sep 14, 2020, 30 patients received AZD3759 at 200 mg (n = 15) or 300 mg (n = 15) bid. At data cutoff (Dec 31, 2022), median follow-up was 35.4 months. The primary endpoint was reached, with a confirmed ORR of 70% (21/30) (200 mg, 80%; 300 mg, 60%). The median progression-free survival was 12.9 months (200 mg, 15.8 months; 300 mg, 10.7 months). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 73% (22/30) of the patients (200 mg: 60%; 300 mg: 87%). 59% (10/17) of the patients developed a T790M mutation at disease progression. The median overall survival was 33.7 months, and 34.1 months and 25.3 months in patient treated with or without osimertinib in a later-line setting, respectively. Interpretation: AZD3759 showed promising efficacy and tolerable safety as a first-line therapy in EGFR-mutated NSCLC with CNS metastases. The 200-mg bid cohort had better clinical outcomes. Sequential use of AZD3759 and third-generation EGFR-TKIs represents a new option. Funding: Chinese Thoracic Oncology Group (CTONG).

Distinct metastatic spread and progression patterns in patients treated with crizotinib for ROS1- and ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer: a single-center retrospective study.

Background: Crizotinib has been approved for C-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1)- and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Few studies have examined the differences in crizotinib treatment outcomes between these patients and the progression sites during treatment. We investigated the metastatic spread, crizotinib efficacy, and progression patterns during crizotinib treatment in ROS1- and ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed crizotinib-treated ROS1- and ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients between January 2011 and March 2021. Patient characteristics, clinical outcomes, and progression patterns during treatment were collected from medical records. The metastasis extent, crizotinib response, and progression patterns between the groups were compared. Results: We identified 26 patients with ROS1- and 42 with ALK-positive NSCLC. The baseline proportion of central nervous system (CNS) metastases did not differ between the groups (12% vs. 29%, P=0.10), but the proportion of extrathoracic metastases, including CNS metastases, was significantly higher in ALK-positive than in ROS1-positive NSCLC patients (35% vs. 71%, P=0.003). Regarding the response to crizotinib, the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), or overall survival (OS) did not significantly differ between the groups (ROS1 vs. ALK, ORR: 69% vs. 69%, P=0.987; PFS: median 10.9 vs. 10.7 months, P=0.232; median OS: not reached vs. 67.7 months, P=0.495). The CNS was the most common metastasis site in both groups [ROS1 vs. ALK, 69% (11/16) vs. 46% (17/37), P=0.127], and the cumulative incidence of CNS metastasis did not differ between the groups (P=0.914). Conclusions: Crizotinib treatment outcomes, including progression patterns, were similar between ROS1- and ALK-positive NSCLC patients.

From preclinical efficacy to 2022 (36.7 months median follow -up) updated CROWN trial, lorlatinib is the preferred 1st-line treatment of advanced ALK+ NSCLC.

Six ALK TKIs (crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, lorlatinib, ensartinib) have received first-line treatment indication of advanced ALK+ NSCLC in various countries. In Ba/F3 cells, lorlatinib achieved lowest IC50 among these 6 ALK TKIs against EML4-ALK variant 1 or 3. In 2022, 7 abstracts reported updated efficacy and safety data from CROWN. With a median follow-up time of 36.7 months, the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 63.5% for lorlatinib-treated patients and the median PFS of lorlatinib still has not been reached. Importantly, post-lorlatinib treatment median PFS2 was 74.0% at 3-years. Lorlatinib-treated Asian patients achieved similar 3-year PFS rate as overall lorlatinib-treated patients. Median PFS was 33.3 months among lorlatinib-treated EML4-ALK v3 patients. CNS AE occurred fewer than 1 event per patient over the median follow-up time of 36.7 months and most resolved without intervention. Altogether these data affirm our belief that lorlatinib should be the treatment of choice of advanced ALK+ NSCLC.

Central nervous system metastasis from epithelial ovarian cancer- predictors of outcome.

Management of central nervous system (CNS) metastases from epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is an unmet need. We analyzed data on 41 such patients to evaluate predictors of outcome. Between January, 2010 and December 2020, among 1028 patients with EOC treated at our institute 41 (3.98%) developed CNS metastasis. Median age of patients was 48 years, ranging from 22 to 75 years. Primary outcome measure was progression free survival (PFS). Overall survival (OS), and analysis of prognostic factors were secondary outcome measures. An intention to treat analysis was done. We also performed review the literature (n=2253) as regards to clinicopathological and radiological features, treatment received, survival outcomes and prognostic factors. Median time from diagnosis of EOC to CNS metastasis was 27 months (range: 0 to 101 months). 33(80.5%) patients had FIGO stage III-IV at baseline and serous carcinoma (75.6%) was common pathology subtype. Thirteen (31.7%) patients had isolated CNS metastasis and 28 (68.3%) had intra-abdominal disease in addition. Nineteen (46.3%) patients achieved complete response post treatment with surgery, radiation and chemotherapy. Median PFS and OS from the time of CNS metastasis is 12 (range:1 to 51) months and 33 (range: 1 to 71) months, respectively. Absence of extracranial disease and lower serum CA-125 at diagnosis of CNS metastasis were predictive of superior PFS and OS on multivariate analysis. CNS metastasis is a late event in EOC, post multiple lines of treatment. Patients with disease limited to brain and treated with surgical resection and chemoradiation have best outcome.

EGFR mutation is not a prognostic factor for CNS metastasis in curatively resected lung adenocarcinoma patients.

INTRODUCTION: For NSCLC patients with complete resection, the prognostic role of EGFR mutation for recurrence, especially for CNS metastasis, is still controversial. In this study, we aimed to identify the characteristics of the recurrence pattern of lung adenocarcinoma based on EGFR mutation status. METHODS: Overall, 888 patients with completely surgically resected LUAD who underwent EGFR mutation status analysis from two Chinese institutions were included. Sites and data of initial recurrence were recorded. The recurrence patterns according to EGFR mutation status were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and hazard rate curves were generated. RESULTS: 245 (27.6%) of 888 patients suffered from recurrence. Before and after PSM, there were no statistically significant differences between the EGFR mutation and EGFR WT groups for all types of recurrence, including CNS metastasis. Multivariable Cox analysis revealed that EGFR status was not a risk factor for all types of recurrence, including CNS metastasis (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.54-1.46, p = 0.632). The CNS metastasis hazard curve in the EGFR mutation group showed that the first peak occurred at approximately 24-26 months after surgery, which was 10 months later than that in the EGFR WT group. In addition, the second peak time in the EGFR mutation group was approximately 2 years later than that in the EGFR WT group. CONCLUSIONS: EGFR mutation was not an independent prognostic factor for postoperative recurrence. EGFR-mutated LUADs did not have a clinical course with a higher incidence of CNS metastasis. However, the peak hazards for recurrence of CNS metastasis occur at a later time point in the EGFR mutant group compared with the EGFR wild type group.

Intraventricular topotecan in the successful treatment of recurrent CNS pleuropulmonary blastoma.

Pleuropulmonary blastoma (PPB) is a rare pediatric tumor of the pleura and pulmonary mesenchyme, associated with pathogenic germline DICER1 mutations. Although the most common site of metastasis is the central nervous system (CNS), patients with CNS metastasis have dismal outcome. We report a case of a patient presenting with type II PPB and intracranial and bone metastases. We describe a multimodal therapy approach and highlight the use of intraventricular topotecan for isolated CNS recurrence. In addition, a new pathogenic germline mutation heterozygous for the c.1234delT of DICER1 was identified. Patient remains in remission 3 years after recurrence.

A case report of prostate adenocarcinoma with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis and intracerebral metastasis.

Despite the fact that prostate cancer is the most prevalent cancer in men, metastases to the central nervous system including leptomeningeal involvement by prostate carcinoma is a rare event. The prognosis of metastatic prostate cancer is very poor due to lack of CNS penetrating therapeutic agents.

Gamma Knife Radiosurgery-Based Combination Treatment Strategies Improve Survival in Patients With Central Nervous System Metastases From Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of Two Academic Institutions in Korea and Taiwan.

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases from epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) are rare. We investigated the clinico-pathological prognostic factors of patients with CNS metastases from EOC and compared the outcomes of various treatment modalities. We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with CNS metastases from EOC between 2000 and 2020. Information on the clinical and pathological characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of these patients was retrieved from Samsung Medical Center and National Taiwan University Hospital. A total of 94 patients with CNS metastases were identified among 6,300 cases of EOC, resulting in an incidence of 1.49%. Serous histological type [hazard ratio (HR): 0.49 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.95), p=0.03], progressive disease [HR: 2.29 (95% CI 1.16-4.54), p=0.01], CNS involvement in first disease relapse [HR: 0.36 (95% CI 0.18-0.70), p=0.002], and gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS)-based combination treatment for EOC patients with CNS lesions [HR: 0.59 (95% CI 0.44-0.79), p<0.001] significantly impacted survival after diagnosis of CNS metastases. In a subgroup analysis, superior survival was observed in patients with CNS involvement not in first tumor recurrence who underwent GKS-based combination therapeutic regimens. The survival benefit of GKS-based treatment was not significant in patients with CNS involvement in first disease relapse, but a trend for longer survival was still observed. In conclusion, GKS-based combination treatment can be considered for the treatment of EOC patients with CNS metastases. The patients with CNS involvement not in first disease relapse could significantly benefit from GKS-based combination strategies.

A Phase II Study of Osimertinib for Radiotherapy-Naive Central Nervous System Metastasis From NSCLC: Results for the T790M Cohort of the OCEAN Study (LOGIK1603/WJOG9116L).

OBJECTIVES: Osimertinib has been reported to be effective against central nervous system (CNS) metastasis from activating EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Nevertheless, the true antitumor effects of osimertinib alone for CNS metastasis are unclear because the aforementioned studies included previously irradiated cases, in which tumor shrinkage can occur later owing to the effects of radiotherapy (RT). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of osimertinib against RT-naive CNS metastasis from sensitizing EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. METHODS: The OCEAN study was a two-cohort trial, involving 66 patients (T790M cohort [n = 40] and first-line cohort [n = 26]) with RT-naive CNS metastasis from sensitizing EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. The patients were treated once daily with 80 mg osimertinib. The primary end point was brain metastasis response rate (BMRR) according to the PAREXEL criteria. In this report, we present the results for the T790M cohort with analysis of drug concentrations and plasma circulating tumor DNA. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 69 years, and 30% of them were males. Eight patients (20%) were symptomatic, and most had multiple CNS metastases (78%). Among the eligible 39 patients, the BMRR (PAREXEL criteria), median brain metastasis-related progression-free survival (PFS), median overall survival, overall response rate, and median PFS were 66.7% (90% confidence interval: 54.3%-79.1%), 25.2 months, 19.8 months, 40.5%, and 7.1 months, respectively. The BMRR according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria was 70.0% (n = 20). The brain metastasis-related PFS of patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion was significantly longer than that of exon 21 L858R (median = 31.8 versus 8.3 mo; log-rank p = 0.032). The treatment-related pneumonitis was observed in four patients (10%). On or after day 22, the median trough blood and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of osimertinib were 568 nM and 4.10 nM, respectively, and those of its metabolite AZ5104 were 68.0 nM and 0.260 nM, respectively. The median blood to cerebrospinal fluid penetration rates of osimertinib and AZ5104 were 0.79% and 0.53%, respectively. The blood trough concentration at day 22 was not correlated with the efficacy of osimertinib against CNS metastasis. Plasma T790M and C797S mutations were detected in 83% and 3% of the patients before treatment, 11% and 3% of the patients on day 22, and 39% and 22% of the patients at the detection of progressive disease, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study evaluated the efficacy of osimertinib against RT-naive CNS metastasis from T790M-positive NSCLC. The primary end point was met, and the results revealed the efficacy of osimertinib in patients with CNS metastasis harboring EGFR T790M mutations especially for EGFR-sensitizing mutation of exon 19 deletion.

Immune Microenvironment Landscape in CNS Tumors and Role in Responses to Immunotherapy.

Despite the important evolution of immunotherapeutic agents, brain tumors remain, in general, refractory to immune therapeutics. Recent discoveries have revealed that the glioma microenvironment includes a wide variety of immune cells in various states that play an important role in the process of tumorigenesis. Anti-tumor immune activity may be occurring or induced in immunogenic hot spots or at the invasive edge of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Understanding the complex heterogeneity of the immune microenvironment in gliomas will likely be the key to unlocking the full potential of immunotherapeutic strategies. An essential consideration will be the induction of immunological effector responses in the setting of the numerous aspects of immunosuppression and evasion. As such, immune therapeutic combinations are a fundamental objective for clinical studies in gliomas. Through immune profiling conducted on immune competent murine models of glioma and ex vivo human glioma tissue, we will discuss how the frequency, distribution of immune cells within the microenvironment, and immune modulatory processes, may be therapeutically modulated to lead to clinical benefits.

Impact of cerebrospinal fluid flow study in patients undergoing intrathecal chemotherapy via ventricular catheter reservoir.

PURPOSE: Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) is a form of CNS cancer metastasis with severe morbidity. Intrathecal chemotherapy (ITC) administration through an implanted ventricular catheter reservoir (IVCR) is often utilized. Additionally, a nuclear imaging flow study can be performed prior to ITC administration to assess cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow. The clinical impact of a CSF flow study is unclear. METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified 31 patients with LMC that underwent IVCR placement between 2011 and 2019. Data extracted included patient demographics, nuclear imaging flow study, surgical complications, ITC toxicities and outcomes. RESULTS: Potential drug-induced neurologic toxicities (headache, nausea/vomiting, altered mental status, etc.) were noted in (n = 4/16) 25% of patients who underwent a flow study prior to initiation of ITC, compared to (n = 1/15) 6.6% of patients who did not undergo a flow study. Median overall survival (OS) was 4.0 and 32.8 months for the patients that underwent a flow study versus patients who did not, respectively (p < 0.01). The mean interval from IVCR implantation to initiation of ITC was 15.2 ± 8.5 days and 3.3 ± 3.0 days in patients who underwent CSF flow study and patients that did not, respectively (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: A flow study can provide information regarding CSF flow dynamics prior to initiation of ITC; however this might delay initiation of ITC which may negatively impact OS. Additionally, in our study patients that underwent a flow study had more ITC induced drug toxicity events compared to those that did not. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of CSF flow study in these patients.

Metastatic melanoma of unknown origin mimicking neurofibromatosis.

We present an unusual case of metastatic melanoma in a young patient with imaging appearance resembling neurofibromatosis. A 36-year-old-man with a history of cervical radiculopathy presented with cauda equina syndrome. An MRI was performed for further evaluation demonstrating multiple intradural, extramedullary enhancing lesions in the thoracic and lumbar spine, as well as extra-axial enhancing lesions with involvement of the lateral ventricles and posterior fossa. Bilateral pulmonary masses were found on chest CT. Lung lesions were biopsied and positive for metastatic melanoma. Melanoma is the third most common primary neoplasm to produce brain metastasis and should be considered on the differential as a cause of newly detected intracranial and intraspinal masses in young patients.

Prostate Cancer Central Nervous System Metastasis in a Contemporary Cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis from prostate cancer (PCA) is a rare event, but one with significant prognostic impact for those affected. There are limited data on its impact in contemporary cohorts treated with modern agents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective institutional review was performed to characterize the occurrence/outcome of PCA CNS metastasis on all cases of PCA from 2011 to 2017. A manual chart review was performed to confirm PCA CNS metastases in all cases identified through a diagnostic code screening of the health data. RESULTS: A total of 6596 cases of PCA were identified, with 29 (20 dural and 9 intraparenchymal) confirmed cases of CNS metastases from PCA. The median survival from the time of diagnosis of CNS metastasis was 2.6 months (95% confidence interval, 2.04-10.78 months) and 5.41 months (95% confidence interval, 3.03 months to not reached) for dural and parenchymal metastases, respectively. Among those who developed CNS metastases, approximately 79% of patients had prior exposure to abiraterone and/or enzalutamide, of whom 50% had ≥ 6 months of exposure. Four (0.07%) of the 5841 patients developed CNS metastases prior to the initiation of therapy or on androgen deprivation therapy alone. In contrast, 24 (8.6%) of the 279 patients with 2 or more lines of medical therapy developed CNS metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis highlights the continued poor prognosis of parenchymal and dural CNS metastases from PCA. CNS metastases in PCA remain a rare event with a 0.4% incidence in this series, but this incidence is considerably increased in patients who receive medical therapy beyond first-line androgen deprivation therapy.

Central nervous system metastases in breast cancer: the impact of age on patterns of development and outcome.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to explore differences in the pattern and outcome of central nervous system (CNS) involvement in breast cancer by age at diagnosis. METHODS: A retrospective database of a tertiary cancer center yielded 174 consecutive patients with breast cancer who were diagnosed with CNS metastases in 2006-2019. Data on histopathology, characteristics of CNS involvement, treatments, and survival (at three time points during the disease course) were compared between patients aged ≤ 45 and > 45 years. Pearson Chi-square or Fisher exact test and Kaplan-Meier survival curves with log-rank test were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Study population was divided according to age at diagnosis of breast cancer. 65 patients were ≤ 45 years old and 109 patients > 45 years old. The younger group was characterized by longer median overall survival (117.1 months vs 88 months, p = 0.017) and longer interval between breast cancer diagnosis to development of CNS metastases (97.4 months vs 75.9 months, p = 0.026). Median survival after development of CNS disease was not significantly different (18.7 months vs 11.1 months, p = 0.341), although it was significantly longer in younger patients within the subgroup of patients with triple-negative disease (22.5 vs 7.9 months, p = 0.033). There were no between-group differences in number, location, and clinical presentation of CNS metastases or in systemic and CNS-directed treatment approaches. CONCLUSION: While the presentation of CNS involvement was similar between the different age groups, younger patients had significantly longer CNS-free interval and longer overall survival, and for the subgroups of triple-negative patients, younger age at breast cancer diagnosis was associated with longer survival after diagnosis of CNS disease.