Theoretical principles explain the structure of the insect head direction circuit.

To navigate their environment, insects need to keep track of their orientation. Previous work has shown that insects encode their head direction as a sinusoidal activity pattern around a ring of neurons arranged in an eight-column structure. However, it is unclear whether this sinusoidal encoding of head direction is just an evolutionary coincidence or if it offers a particular functional advantage. To address this question, we establish the basic mathematical requirements for direction encoding and show that it can be performed by many circuits, all with different activity patterns. Among these activity patterns, we prove that the sinusoidal one is the most noise-resilient, but only when coupled with a sinusoidal connectivity pattern between the encoding neurons. We compare this predicted optimal connectivity pattern with anatomical data from the head direction circuits of the locust and the fruit fly, finding that our theory agrees with experimental evidence. Furthermore, we demonstrate that our predicted circuit can emerge using Hebbian plasticity, implying that the neural connectivity does not need to be explicitly encoded in the genetic program of the insect but rather can emerge during development. Finally, we illustrate that in our theory, the consistent presence of the eight-column organisation of head direction circuits across multiple insect species is not a chance artefact but instead can be explained by basic evolutionary principles.

Insects, including fruit flies and locusts, move throughout their environment to find food, interact with each other or escape danger. To navigate their surroundings, insects need to be able to keep track of their orientation. This tracking is achieved through visual cues and integrating information about their movements whilst flying so they know which direction their head is facing. The set of neurons responsible for relaying information about the direction of the head (also known as heading) are connected together in a ring made up of eight columns of cells. Previous studies showed that the level of activity across this ring of neurons resembles a sinusoid shape: a smooth curve with one peak which encodes the animal's heading. Neurons downstream from this eight-column ring, which relay velocity information, also display this sinusoidal pattern of activation. Aceituno, Dall'Osto and Pisokas wanted to understand whether this sinusoidal pattern was an evolutionary coincidence, or whether it offers a particular advantage to insects. To answer this question, they established the mathematical criteria required for neurons in the eight-column ring to encode information about the heading of the animal. This revealed that these conditions can be satisfied by many different patterns of activation, not just the sinusoidal shape. However, Aceituno, Dall'Osto and Pisokas show that the sinusoidal shape is the most resilient to variations in neuronal activity which may impact the encoded information. Further experiments revealed that this resilience only occurred if neurons in the circuit were connected together in a certain pattern. Aceituno, Dall'Osto and Pisokas then compared this circuit with experimental data from locusts and fruit flies and found that both insects exhibit the predicted connection pattern. They also discovered that animals do not have to be born with this neuronal connection pattern, but can develop it during their lifetime. These findings provide fresh insights into how insects relay information about the direction of their head as they fly. They suggest that the structure of the neuronal circuit responsible for encoding head direction was not formed by chance but instead arose due to the evolutionary benefits it provided.

Compass model-based quality assurance for stereotactic VMAT treatment plans.

PURPOSE: To use Compass as a model-based quality assurance (QA) tool for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans calculated with Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty clinical stereotactic VMAT SBRT and SRT treatment plans were blindly selected for evaluation. Those plans included four different treatment sites: prostate, brain, lung and body. The plans were evaluated against dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters and 2D and 3D gamma analysis. The dose calculated with Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) was compared to Compass calculated dose (CCD) and Compass reconstructed dose (CRD). RESULTS: The maximum differences in mean dose of planning target volume (PTV) were 2.7 ±â€¯1.0% between AAA and Acuros XB calculation algorithm TPS dose, -7.6 ±â€¯3.5% between Eclipse TPS dose and CCD dose and -5.9 ±â€¯3.7% between Eclipse TPS dose and CRD dose for both Eclipse calculation algorithms, respectively. 2D gamma analysis was not able to identify all the cases that 3D gamma analysis specified for further verification. CONCLUSIONS: Compass is suitable for QA of SBRT and SRT treatment plans. However, the QA process should include wide set of DVH-based dose parameters and 3D gamma analysis should be the preferred method when performing clinical patient QA. The results suggest that the Compass should not be used for smaller field sizes than 3 × 3 cm2 or the beam model should be adjusted separately for both small (FS ≤ 3 cm) and large (FS > 3 cm) field sizes.

Compass systems.

Three compass systems based on global cues known to exist in migrating birds are reviewed. Two of these systems are based on celestial cues, a time-dependent sun compass and time-independent, i.e. not involving the internal clock, star compass. The third system is the magnetic compass, based on a separate sensory modality, which currently attracts much attention from behavioural ecologists, physiologists and physicists. The complex pattern of hierarchy and interactions between these compass systems is briefly discussed. It is argued that rules of integration of information from different compass cues are likely dependent on ecological and geographic conditions the birds are facing during their journey, so it is likely that no single set of rules is shared by all migrating birds.

Clinically relevant quality assurance (QA) for prostate RapidArc plans: gamma maps and DVH-based evaluation.

The aim of this paper is to evaluate clinically relevant quality assurance (QA) tests for RapidArc prostate patients. 26 plans were verified by the COMPASS system that provides an independent angle response and a reconstruction of dose distribution in patient CT model. Plan data were imported from treatment planning system via DICOM. The fluencies, measured by a 2D detector, were used by COMPASS to forward calculate dose in CT patients and reconstruct dose-volume-histogram (DVH). The gamma analysis was performed, using both the criteria 3%-3-mm and 2%-2 mm, for the whole grid patient and the per-structure volume. A DVH-based analysis was accomplished for target and organs-at-risk (OAR). The correlation between gamma passing rates and DVH discrepancies was performed using Pearson's test. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of whole and per-structure gamma method were calculated. No significant DVH deviation was observed for target and OAR. Weak correlation between gamma passing rates and dosimetric deviations was observed, all significant r-values were negative. The whole gamma method shows lack of sensitivity to detect dosimetric deviations >5%. Instead, a better balance between sensitivity and specificity was obtained employing per structure gamma both with 3%-3 mm and 2%-2 mm criteria. Because of the poor correlation between DVH goals and gamma passing rates, we encourage the DVH-based gamma passing rates, when it is possible. At least, a gamma method specific for structure was strongly suggested.

Dosimetric verification of volumetric modulated arc therapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma using COMPASS 3D patient anatomy based system / 中华放射医学与防护杂志

Objective To investigate the dosimetric performance of COMPASS system,a novel 3D quality assurance system for the verification of nasopharyngeal carcinoma volumetric modulated therapy (VMAT) treatment plan.Methods Eight VMAT treatment plans of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients were performed with MasterPlan,a treatment planning system (TPS),and then these treatment plans were sent to the COMPASS and MOSAIQ system,a coherent control system,respectively.Comparison of the COMPASS reconstructed dose versus TPS dose was conducted by using the dose volume-based indices:dose received by 95％ volume of target ( D95％ ),mean dose ( Dmean ) and γ pass rate,dose to the 1％ of the spinal cord and brain stem volume ( D1％ ),mean dose of leaf and right parotid ( Dmean ),and the volume received 30 Gy for left and right parotid (V30).COMPASS can reconstruct dose with the real measured delivery fluence after detector commissioning.Results The average dose difference for the target volumes was within 1％,the difference for D95 was within 3％ for most treatment plans,and the γ pass rate was higher than 95％ for all target volumes.The average differences for the D1％ values of spinal cord and brain stem were ( 4.3 ± 3.0) ％ and ( 5.9± 2.9 ) ％ respectively,and the average differences for the Dmean values of spinal cord and brain stem were ( 5.3 ± 3.0 ) ％ and ( 8.0 ± 3.5 ) ％ respectively.In general the COMPASS measured doses were all smaller than the TPS calculated doses for these two organs.The average differences of the Dmean values of the left and right parotids were( 6.1± 3.1 ) ％ and ( 4.7 ± 4.4 ) ％ respectively,and the average differences of the V30 values of the left and right parotids were (9.4 ± 7.5 ) ％ and (9.4 ± 9.9)％ respectively.Conclusions An ideal tool for the VMAT verification,the patient anatomy based COMPASS 3D dose verification system can check the dose difference between the real delivery and TPS calculation directly for each individual organ,either target volumes or critical organs.