Cyclosporin A as an Add-On Therapy to a Corticosteroid-Based Background Treatment in Patients with COVID-19: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: In susceptible hosts, SARS-CoV2-induced hyperinflammation accounts for an increased mortality. The search of adjuvant immunomodulatory therapies has been ongoing ever since the pandemic outbreak. Aim: Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy of cyclosporin A (CsA) as an add-on therapy to the standard of care (SoC) in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods: We conducted a randomized clinical trial in patients admitted to eight Spanish tertiary hospitals. Patients were stratified into two severity categories and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a corticosteroid-based standard therapy with or without CsA. The primary endpoint was FiO2 recovery by Day 12 without relapses. Results: 109 patients were included and randomized, and 98 of them considered for the mITT population (51 assigned to the CsA + SoC group and 47 to the SoC group). A total of 35 (68.6%) patients from the CsA + SoC group and 32 (71.1%) patients from the SoC group reached the primary endpoint in the mITT analysis. No differences were found after stratification into age groups, in the severity level at admission, or in a combination of both. Overall, the time to FiO2 normalization was 7.4 days vs. 7.9 days in the experimental and control groups, respectively. Global mortality was 8.2%. Severe adverse events were uncommon and equally distributed between arms. Conclusion: The addition of CsA did not show differences over a corticosteroid-based treatment in the clinical course of the included patients. A better identification of candidates who will benefit from receiving immunomodulatory drugs is necessary in future studies.

Tocilizumab in combination with standard of care in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia: efficacy and safety from a phase 3 clinical trial in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is characterized by high interleukin-6 levels. Clinical data supporting tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets interleukin-6 receptor-alpha, for treating Japanese patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia are needed. METHODS: This single-arm phase 3 study investigated tocilizumab (8 mg/kg) plus standard of care (SOC) in Japanese patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Clinical status was assessed using a 7-category ordinal scale on day 28 (primary endpoint) and day 14 (secondary endpoint). Other secondary endpoints were time to improvement (≥2 category improvement) and time to hospital discharge. Safety was assessed as the incidence of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Among 48 patients enrolled, 44 (91.7%) scored ≥3 on the 7-category ordinal scale at baseline. At day 28, 35 patients (72.9%) scored 1 and 5 (10.4%) scored 7 on the 7-category ordinal scale; 36 (75.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 60.40-86.36%) and 39 (81.3%, 95% CI: 67.37-91.05%) patients achieved ≥2- and ≥1-category improvement, respectively; 6 patients (12.5%, 95% CI: 4.73-25.25%) demonstrated ≥1-category worsening. At day 14, 25 (52.1%, 95% CI: 37.19-66.71%) and 33 patients (68.8%, 95% CI: 53.75-81.34%) achieved ≥2- and ≥1-category improvement, respectively; 5 patients (10.4%, 95% CI: 3.47-22.66%) demonstrated ≥1-category worsening. Median times (95% CI) to improvement and hospital discharge were 11 (9-15) and 15 (11-18) days, respectively. Forty patients (83.3%) experienced AEs; the incidence of ≥grade 3 AEs was 25%. CONCLUSION: Tocilizumab plus SOC may provide improved clinical status in Japanese patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia; no new safety signals were identified.

A Retrospective Comparison of Clinical and Laboratory Aspects of Patients With COVID-19-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) and Non-COVID-19-Related ARDS.

AIM/OBJECTIVE: This study investigated demographic characteristics, hemodynamic values, respiratory datas, laboratory values ​​such as biochemistry and blood gas, and treatment approaches of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related and non-COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU). BACKGROUND: Determining the differences and similarities between COVID-19-related ARDS (CARDS) patients and non-COVID-19-related ARDS (NCARDS) patients will be useful to better understand these two diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 32 NCARDS patients who were followed and treated in the ICU for various reasons between January 2015 and December 2020 and 32 CARDS patients who were followed and treated in the ICU for various reasons between March 2020 and December 2020 were examined retrospectively. Age, gender, comorbidities, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II Score, blood pressure, heart rate, saturation, laboratory results, arterial blood gas (ABG) values, length of stay in the ICU, intubation, the number of days till the patient was extubated, the treatments applied, admission to the service, and mortality were evaluated. RESULTS: In the comparison between the two groups, the demographic data of the patients, the number of days intubated and extubated, APACHE II scores, and ICU length of stay were not statistically different. Values of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), first hospitalization GCS, first hospitalization hemoglobin (Hgb), albumin at first admission, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) at first admission, and steroid use were found to be significantly different in patients with CARDS (p < 0.001). The median of PEEP values (p = 0.04), first admission GCS values (p = 0.04), first admission Hgb values (p = 0.005), albumin values at the first admission (p = 0.03), ALT values (p = 0.03), and the rate of steroid use (p = 0.001) of CARDS patients were significantly higher than those of NCARDS patients. The median of the first hospitalization heart rate values (p = 0.009), first hospitalization saturation values (p = 0.001), and first admission neutrophil values (p = 0.03) in NCARDS patients were significantly higher than that of CARDS patients. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of mortality, sedation use, inotropic support, C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin values. CONCLUSIONS: CARDS and NCARDS have clinical and laboratory similarities and differences. Therefore, there should be differences in our follow-up and treatment approach to these two disease groups.

Clinical Characteristics and Risk Factors of Mechanical Ventilation Among COVID-19 Patients on High-Flow Nasal Oxygen (HFNO).

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 is a viral infection affecting the respiratory system, primarily. It has spread globally ever since it first appeared in China in 2019. The use of high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) for the treatment of COVID-19 has not been well established. OBJECTIVES: The primary objectives of this study are to observe the success of HFNO in preventing escalation to mechanical ventilation (MV) and to measure the prevalence of HFNO in King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC). The secondary objective is to describe patients who received HFNO clinically. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of all polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed COVID-19 patients who require oxygen therapy in KAMC, Jeddah between March 1st, 2020, and December 31st, 2020. Any patients requiring MV on admission were excluded. RESULTS: 259 patients fit the inclusion criteria, and 25.5% of those included received HFNO. The number of non-survivors is 47 (18.1%). Mortality for HFNO, MV, and intensive care unit (ICU) are 30 (45.5%), 31 (60.8%), and 24 (32%), respectively. Their demographic was as follows; 160 were males, with a mean age of 60.93±15.01. Regarding the types of oxygen, low-flow nasal oxygen (LFNO) was administered to 243 out of the 259 patients, 66 received HFNO, 42 received MV, and 49 received other modes of ventilation. Additionally, 43.9% received HFNO escalated to MV. Patients who did not receive HFNO or MV were 178 (68.7%) in total. CONCLUSION: The use of HFNO in COVID-19 patients could show better outcomes than MV in addition to preventing the use of MV. Larger studies are required to determine the efficacy of HFNO in COVID-19 patients.

Clinical features and outcomes in kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19 pneumonia: a single center retrospective cohort study.

Objective: This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the clinical features, treatment outcomes, and short-term prognosis in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with concurrent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. Methods: KTRs with COVID-19 pneumonia who were admitted to our hospital from December 28, 2022, to March 28, 2023 were included in the study. Their clinical symptoms, responses to antiviral medications, and short-term prognosis were analyzed. Results: A total of 64 KTRs with initial diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia were included in this study. The primary symptoms were fever, cough, and myalgia, with an incidence of 79.7%, 89.1%, and 46.9%, respectively. The administration of antiviral drugs (paxlovid or molnupiravir) within 1-5 days and for over 5 days demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in viral shedding time compared to the group without antiviral medication (P=0.002). Both the paxlovid and molnupiravir treatment groups exhibited a significantly shorter duration of viral shedding time in comparison to the group without antiviral drugs (P=0.002). After 6 months of recovery, there was no significantly negative impact on transplant kidney function (P=0.294). Conclusion: Fever, cough, and myalgia remain common initial symptoms of concurrent COVID-19 pneumonia in KTRs. Early use of antiviral drugs (paxlovid or molnupiravir) is associated with better therapeutic outcomes. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) had a limited impact on the short-term renal function of the KTRs with concurrent moderate or severe COVID-19 pneumonia.

Probing liver function test patterns in COVID-19 pneumonia: Implications for disease severity assessment.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the incidence of liver function test derangement, the precise patterns of derangement, and their relationship with coronavirus disease-2019 pneumonia severity. METHODS: The retrospective study was conducted at the Dow University Hospital and the Ojha Institute of Chest Diseases, Karachi, and comprised consecutive data from December 16, 2020, to March 16, 2021, of adults of either gender who had nasal swabs positive for coronavirus disease-2019 on real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Data regarding patients' demographics, co-morbidities, addictions, laboratory results, and standard information was retrieved from electronic and manual records. The severity of the disease was determined based on World Health Organisation protocols. Data was analysed using SPSS 23. RESULTS: Of the 344 patients, 235(68.3%) were males and 109(31.7%) were females. The overall mean age was 54.58±14.75 years, 187(54.4%) had severe coronavirus disease-2019 pneumonia and 157(45.6%) had non-severe disease at the time of admission. There was a significant prevalence of both mixed and cholestatic patterns of liver function test abnormality among the cases (p=0.046). The presence of a mixed pattern was linked to the disease severity (p<0.05). Advanced age and hypertension were significant risk factors for the development of severe coronavirus disease-2019 pneumonia (p<0.001 and p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Liver function test abnormality and coronavirus disease-2019 pneumonia severity were fund to have a significant relationship.

Association Between Barthel's Index Change and All-Cause Mortality Among COVID-19 Pneumonia Patients Aged Over 80 Years Old: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Purpose: It has been shown that lower Barthel's index (BI) at admission is associated with a higher in-hospital mortality. There is a lack of evidence regarding the association between the change in BI during hospitalization and mortality after discharge. Our purpose was to determine whether the BI change during hospitalization is associated with all-cause mortality in older adults with COVID-19 pneumonia. Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 330 participants at Peking University Third Hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic period. In order to analyze the time to death data, a Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used. We used restricted cubic splines to analyze the association between BI change and all-cause mortality among COVID-19 pneumonia patients aged over 80 years old. Threshold effect analysis was used to assess the ability of BI change score to predict all-cause mortality. Results: Our study included 330 patients aged over 80 years with COVID-19 pneumonia. The Kaplan-Meier curve for mortality showed significantly worst survival with reduced BI among three groups (χ2= 6.896, P < 0.05). There was a non-linear association between the BI change and all-cause mortality (P for all over <0.001). The effect sizes on the left and right sides of the inflection point were 0.958 (HR: 0.958, 95% CI 0.932-0.958, P < 0.05) and 1.013 (HR: 1.013, 95% CI 0.967-1.062, P > 0.05), respectively. Conclusion: Reduced BI during hospitalization was associated with the highest mortality risk. It is crucial to monitor BI change among COVID-19 pneumonia patients aged over 80 years old.

Knowledge fused latent representation from lung ultrasound examination for COVID-19 pneumonia severity assessment.

COVID-19 pneumonia severity assessment is of great clinical importance, and lung ultrasound (LUS) plays a crucial role in aiding the severity assessment of COVID-19 pneumonia due to its safety and portability. However, its reliance on qualitative and subjective observations by clinicians is a limitation. Moreover, LUS images often exhibit significant heterogeneity, emphasizing the need for more quantitative assessment methods. In this paper, we propose a knowledge fused latent representation framework tailored for COVID-19 pneumonia severity assessment using LUS examinations. The framework transforms the LUS examination into latent representation and extracts knowledge from regions labeled by clinicians to improve accuracy. To fuse the knowledge into the latent representation, we employ a knowledge fusion with latent representation (KFLR) model. This model significantly reduces errors compared to approaches that lack prior knowledge integration. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our method, achieving high accuracy of 96.4 % and 87.4 % for binary-level and four-level COVID-19 pneumonia severity assessments, respectively. It is worth noting that only a limited number of studies have reported accuracy for clinically valuable exam level assessments, and our method surpass existing methods in this context. These findings highlight the potential of the proposed framework for monitoring disease progression and patient stratification in COVID-19 pneumonia cases.

Comparative analysis of prognostic scoring systems in predicting severity and outcomes of Omicron variant COVID-19 pneumonia.

Background: The global spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) underscores the urgent need for reliable methods to forecast the disease's severity and outcome, thereby facilitating timely interventions and reducing mortality rates. This study focuses on evaluating the clinical and laboratory profiles of patients with Omicron variant-induced COVID-19 pneumonia and assessing the efficacy of various scoring systems in prognosticating disease severity and mortality. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, we examined the clinical records of 409 individuals diagnosed with Omicron variant COVID-19 pneumonia. We documented the Pneumonia Severity Index, CURB-65, and MuLBSTA scores within the first 24 h and analyzed the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for each scoring system to ascertain their predictive accuracy for disease severity and fatality risk. Results: The cohort's median age was 78 years, predominantly presenting with fever, cough, expectoration, fatigue, and gastrointestinal symptoms. Factors such as expectoration, fatigue, Glasgow Coma Scale score, lactate dehydrogenase levels, procalcitonin, creatinine levels, and co-occurrence of acute respiratory distress syndrome were identified as independent predictors of disease severity. Furthermore, age, oxygenation index, glucose levels, lactate dehydrogenase, and septic shock were independently associated with mortality. For severe disease prediction, the CURB-65, PSI, and MuLBSTA scores demonstrated sensitivities of 65.9%, 63.8%, and 79.7%, respectively, with specificities of 63.8%, 76.8%, and 60.9%, and AUROCs of 0.707, 0.750, and 0.728. To predict mortality risk, these scores at cutoffs of 1.5, 102.5, and 12.5 exhibited sensitivities of 83.3%, 96.3%, and 70.4%, specificities of 59.4%, 60.8%, and 65.4%, and AUROCs of 0.787, 0.850, and 0.736, respectively. Conclusion: The study cohort predominantly comprised elderly individuals with pre-existing health conditions. Elevated lactate dehydrogenase emerged as a significant marker for both disease severity and prognosis, sputum production, gastrointestinal symptoms, GCS score, creatinine, PCT, and ARDS as independent predictors of disease severity, and age, oxygenation index, glucose levels, and septic shock as independent mortality predictors in COVID-19 pneumonia patients. Among the scoring systems evaluated, Pneumonia Severity Index demonstrated superior predictive capability for both disease severity and mortality, suggesting its utility in forecasting the clinical outcomes of Omicron variant COVID-19 pneumonia.

The existence of adrenal insufficiency in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

Introduction: Infection with SARS-CoV-2 virus may result in long COVID, a syndrome characterized by symptoms such as dyspnea, cardiac abnormalities, cognitive impairment, and fatigue. One potential explanation for these symptoms is hypocortisolism. Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of hypocortisolism in patients with a history of COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods: Cross-sectional study of patients who were aged ≥18 years and had a 3-month history of radiography-confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia. Exclusion criteria included current or previous treatment with glucocorticoids and use of an oral contraceptive. Adrenal function was evaluated using a low dose (1ug) corticotropin stimulation test (CST). Serum cortisol levels were measured at 0, 30, and 60 minutes, and baseline plasma ACTH was also measured. Results: Of the 41 patients enrolled, the median age was 62 years, 17 (42%) were female, and all 41 (100%) had severe pneumonia at baseline. Eleven patients (27%) had hypocortisolism, as evidenced by peak cortisol of less than 402.81 nmol/l after low dose (1 µg) CST. Of these 11 patients, 10 (91%) had secondary hypocortisolism (median ACTH 6.27 pmol/L, range 4.98-9.95 pmol/L) and one had primary hypocortisolism (mean ACTH 32.78 pmol/L). Six of the 11 patients with hypocortisolism (54.5%) reported symptoms of persistent fatigue and 5 (45.5%) required regular glucocorticoid replacement. Conclusions: Our results suggest that hypocortisolism, predominantly caused by pituitary disruption, may emerge after SARS-CoV-2 infection and should be considered in patients with a history of COVID-19 pneumonia with or without clinical hypocortisolism.

Human Genetic and Immunological Determinants of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) induces pneumonia and acute respiratory failure in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with inborn errors of immunity to type I interferon (IFN-I). The impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection varies widely, ranging from mild respiratory symptoms to life-threatening illness and organ failure, with a higher incidence in men than in women. Approximately 3 to 5% of critical COVID-19 patients under 60 and a smaller percentage of elderly patients exhibit genetic defects in IFN-I production, including X-chromosome-linked TLR7 and autosomal TLR3 deficiencies. Around 15 to 20% of cases over 70 years old, and a smaller percentage of younger patients, present with preexisting autoantibodies neutralizing type I interferons. Additionally, innate errors affecting the control of the response to type I interferon have been associated with pediatric multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C). Several studies have described rare errors of immunity, such as XIAP deficiency, CYBB, SOCS1, OAS1/2, and RNASEL, as underlying factors in MIS-C susceptibility. However, further investigations in expanded patient cohorts are needed to validate these findings and pave the way for new genetic approaches to MIS-C. This review aims to present recent evidence from the scientific literature on genetic and immunological abnormalities predisposing individuals to critical SARS-CoV-2 infection through IFN-I. We will also discuss multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). Understanding the immunological mechanisms and pathogenesis of severe COVID-19 may inform personalized patient care and population protection strategies against future serious viral infections.

Differential Anxiety Responses in Acute Myocardial Infarction vs. COVID-19 Pneumonia Patients.

Background and Objectives: Amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, concerns about the psychological impact of disease-related anxiety on public health have risen. This study aims to compare general and death anxiety levels between acute coronary artery syndrome and COVID-19 pneumonia patients. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study of 132 individuals, including acute myocardial infarction (MI), COVID-19 pneumonia patients, and healthy volunteers from Trakya University Hospital (Turkey), was analyzed. Validated scales like the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Coronavirus Anxiety Scale Short Form, and Thorson-Powell Death Anxiety Scale (TPDAS) were employed. Demographic data such as age, gender, income levels, employment status, presence of a close relative with COVID-19, and whether participants followed COVID-19-related news were collected and compared across groups with significance level of 0.05 set for all analyses. Results: Among 41 COVID-19, 41 MI, and 50 healthy subjects, the pneumonia group showed highest COVID-19 anxiety (p = 0.01) and BAI scores (p = 0.008). Both COVID-19 and MI patients had significantly higher BAI and TPDAS scores compared to healthy controls (p < 0.001). Factors like female gender (p = 0.004), low education (p = 0.003), current employment (p = 0.008), and low income (p = 0.002) correlated with higher BAI scores. Low income (p = 0.001) and COVID-19 news exposure (p = 0.002) correlated with higher TPDAS scores. Males and married patients had lower anxiety scores (p = 0.008). High income, education, and employment reduced anxiety levels (p = 0.008). TPDAS scores decreased with higher income (p = 0.001), but increased in the MI group (p = 0.002) with COVID-19 news exposure. The multivariate linear regression analysis found that MI and COVID-19 pneumonia were associated with TPDAS; female gender, university education, and COVID-19 pneumonia with the Beck scale; and COVID-19 pneumonia with anxiety scores on the COVID-19 Anxiety scale. Conclusions: This research showcases differing anxiety patterns between illnesses such as MI and COVID-19 pneumonia amidst the pandemic, emphasizing the amplifying influence of media coverage on death-related anxieties. It underscores the imperative of targeted interventions and socioeconomic considerations in managing psychological consequences and formulating responsive public health strategies.

FOT Technique Applied for Monitoring of COVID-19 Pneumonia Reveals Small Airways Involvement.

The fact that some SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia patients benefit from changing body position, and some from continuous positive airways pressure (CPAP), indicates the functional character of hypoxia. We hypothesize that such effects could be explained by the closure of small airways. To prove the hypothesis, we evaluated the patency of small airways in 30 oxygen-dependent, spontaneously breathing patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia during their hospital stay using the FOT method and then compared the results with data obtained three months later. During the acute period, total resistance (R5) and peripheral resistance (R5-20) rose above the upper limit of normal (ULN) in 28% and 50% of all patients, respectively. Reactance indices X5, AX and Fres exceeded ULN in 55%, 68% and 66% of cases. Significant correlations were observed between PaO2/FiO2, the time spent in the hospital and R5, X5, AX and Fres. After 3 months, 18 patients were re-examined. During the hospital stay, 11 of them had risen above the upper limit of normal (ULN), for both resistance (R5-20) and reactance (X5, AX) values. Three months later, ULN for R5-20 was exceeded in only four individuals, but ULN for X5 and AX was exceeded in five individuals. Lung function examination revealed a combined restrictive/obstructive ventilatory failure and reduced CO transfer factor. We interpret these changes as lung tissue remodeling due to the process of fibrosis. We conclude that during acute period of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, dilated pulmonary blood vessels and parenchymal oedema induce functional closure of small airways, which in turn induce atelectasis with pulmonary right-to-left shunting, followed by the resulting hypoxemia.

Outcomes of Tube Thoracostomies in COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study in the University of the Philippines - Philippine General Hospital COVID-19 Referral Center.

Objective: To describe the treatment outcomes of patients who underwent tube thoracostomy for pleural complications in patients with COVID-19 and determine the association between patient profile and treatment outcomes. Methods: A single-institution retrospective review of patients who underwent tube thoracostomy for complications of COVID-19 infection in the University of the Philippines - Philippine General Hospital (UP-PGH) from March 30, 2020, to March 31, 2021, was performed. These patients' demographic and clinical profiles were evaluated using median, frequencies, and percentages. The association between patient profile, and mortality and reintervention rates was assessed using univariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results: Thirty-four (34) of 3,397 patients (1.00%) admitted for COVID-19 pneumonia underwent tube thoracostomy. Of these, 34, 47.06% were male, 52.94% were female, the median age was 51.5 years old, 85.29% had comorbid conditions, and 29.41% had a previous or ongoing tuberculous infection. The most common indication for tube thoracostomy was pleural effusion (61.76%), followed by pneumothorax (29.41%), and pneumo-hydrothorax (8.82%). The mortality rate was 38.24%, and the reintervention rate was 14.71%. Intubated patients had 14.84 times higher mortality hazards than those on room air. For every unit increase in procalcitonin levels, the mortality hazards were increased by 1.06 times. Conclusion: An increasing level of oxygen support on admission and a level of procalcitonin were directly related to mortality risk in COVID-19 patients who underwent tube thoracostomy for pleural complications. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that patient-related, COVID-19 pneumonia-related, and procedure-related factors included in this study were significantly associated with reintervention risk.

Imaging of pulmonary infections encountered in the emergency department in post-COVID 19 era- common, rare and exotic. Bacterial and viral.

Pulmonary infections contribute substantially to emergency department (ED) visits, posing a considerable health burden. Lower respiratory tract infections are prevalent, particularly among the elderly, constituting a significant percentage of infectious disease-related ED visits. Timely recognition and treatment are crucial to mitigate morbidity and mortality. Imaging studies, primarily chest radiographs and less frequently CT chests, play a pivotal role in diagnosis. This article aims to elucidate the imaging patterns of both common and rare pulmonary infections (bacterial and viral) in the post COVID-19 era, emphasizing the importance of recognizing distinct radiological manifestations. The integration of clinical and microbiological evidence aids in achieving accurate diagnoses, and guiding optimal therapeutic interventions. Despite potential overlapping manifestations, a nuanced understanding of radiological patterns, coupled with comprehensive clinical and microbiological information, enhances diagnostic precision in majority cases.

The Short and Long of COVID-19: A Review of Acute and Chronic Radiologic Pulmonary Manifestations of SARS-2-CoV and Their Clinical Significance.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia has had catastrophic effects worldwide. Radiology, in particular computed tomography (CT) imaging, has proven to be valuable in the diagnosis, prognostication, and longitudinal assessment of those diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia. This article will review acute and chronic pulmonary radiologic manifestations of COVID-19 pneumonia with an emphasis on CT and also highlighting histopathology, relevant clinical details, and some notable challenges when interpreting the literature.

The role of thoracic surgery in the management of complicated acute and post-acute COVID-19 pneumonia (PASC).

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 is considered a respiratory virosis in its classic form, although it may present with heterogeneous symptoms. Thoracic complications occur in a small percentage of patients. Our objective was to evaluate existing experience with this disease and its thoracic manifestations and to determine the real-world status of care of these patients. METHODS: This study is a retrospective, single-institution analysis of a group of patients hospitalized with acute and post-acute COVID-19 pneumonia at Thomayer Hospital in Prague in the period from December 2020 to March 2022 and indicated for a thoracic surgical procedure. RESULTS: During the peak of COVID-19 pandemic, a thoracic intervention was performed in 46 admitted patients. Thoracic drainage (due to pneumothorax in 18 cases, fluidothorax in 3 cases, CT-guided lung abscess drainage in 2 cases, and CT-guided pneumatocele drainage in 2 cases) were the most common thoracic surgical procedures. Pleurectomy/decortication surgery was done in 10 cases. Additionally, 12 lung parenchyma-sparing resections were performed, while lobectomy was required in 2 cases. Resection of postintubation tracheal stenosis due to a severe course of COVID-19 pneumonia was indicated in 2 patients. CONCLUSION: Even mild COVID-19 may cause a considerable morphological a functional alteration of the respiratory system. The most common complications of COVID-19 pneumonia that require a thoracic surgical intervention include pathologies associated with an air leak and accumulation of air (pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema). The development of pulmonary necrosis, symptomatic bronchiectasis, pneumatocele, and bullous-fibrotic formations may result in pneumothorax, hemothorax or thoracic empyema in sporadic cases. An early thoracic surgical intervention to treat thoracic complications of COVID-19 pneumonia can improve the survival of COVID-19 patients.

Remdesivir versus Favipiravir in Hospitalized Patients with Moderate to Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: Remdesivir treatment was associated with a reduced 28-day mortality and recovery time among patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19. Favipiravir is broadly used to treat COVID-19. However, various studies have had conflicting results on the efficacy of favipiravir for COVID-19. We hypothesized that remdesivir is more effective in clinical outcomes regarding the 29-day mortality rates, length of stay, and recovery rate than favipiravir in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study that included adult hospitalized COVID-19 pneumonia patients with hypoxemia. Patients were classified into two groups according to the antiviral drugs. Age, oxygen saturation, fraction of inspired oxygen, and Charlson comorbidity index were used for propensity score matching. The primary objective was to determine whether the type of antiviral agent is associated with 29-day mortality. Other outcomes were the 15-day recovery rate and the length of intensive care unit or hospital stay. Results: A total of 249 patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 pneumonia were included. With an adjustment for propensity score-matched, there were 204 patients for further analysis (102 patients in each antiviral drug group). Remdesivir patients had higher Radiographic Assessment of Lung Edema (RALE) scores on Chest X-ray (14.32±9.08 vs 11.34±8.46; standardized mean difference =33.9%). The Charlson Comorbidity Index Scores were comparable. The prevalences of diabetes, obesity, hypertension, and non-HIV immunocompromised state were higher in the remdesivir group. Regarding the primary outcomes, after adjusting by diabetes, obesity, and RALE score, there was no difference in the 29-day mortality rate between both groups [26 patients (25.5%) in the remdesivir group vs 28 patients (27.5%) in the favipiravir group]. The Kaplan-Meier curve analysis at 29 days indicated no significant difference in cumulative survival rate. The two groups' adjusted hazard ratio was 0.72; 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.25, p=0.24. A Kaplan-Meier analysis on the 15-day cumulative survival rate observed a trend towards a higher survival rate in the remdesivir group (adjusted hazard ratio 0.41; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.84; p= 0.02) The proportion of patients who recovered on day 15, the length of intensive care unit(ICU) stays, and the hospital stay were not different between remdesivir and favipiravir groups (62 patients (60.8%) vs 56 patients (54.9%), p=0.39; 11.48 ± 11.88 days vs 10.87 ± 9.31 days, p=0.69; and 16.64±14.28 days vs 16.59 ±11.31 days, p=0.98, respectively). Conclusion: In patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 pneumonia, Remdesivir did not demonstrate superior benefits over Favipiravir regarding 29-day mortality, 15-day recovery rates, or hospital and ICU stay lengths. However, further investigation into the 15-day cumulative survival rate revealed a trend towards improved survival in the Remdesivir group.

The Comparison of Ultrasound and Tomographic Images of Lung Involvement in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Prospective Observational Study.

Introduction Computed tomography (CT) has a high sensitivity for diagnosing COVID-19 pneumonia in critically ill patients, but it has significant limitations. Lung ultrasonography (LUS) is an imaging method increasingly used in intensive care units. Our primary aim is to evaluate the relationship between LUS and CT images by scoring a critically ill patient who was previously diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia and underwent CT, as well as to determine their relationship with the patient's oxygenation. Methods This was a single-center, prospective observational study. The study included COVID-19 patients (positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, RT-PCR) who were admitted to the intensive care unit between June 2020 and December 2020, whose oxygen saturation (SpO2) was below 92%, and who underwent a chest tomography scan within the last 12 hours. CT findings were scored by the radiologist using the COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS). The intensivist evaluated 12 regions to determine the LUS score. The ratio of the partial pressure of oxygen in the arterial blood to the inspiratory oxygen concentration (PaO2/FiO2) was used to assess the patient's oxygenation. Results The study included 30 patients and found a weak correlation (ICC = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.25-0.65, p < 0.05) between total scores obtained from LUS and CT scans. The correlation between the total LUS score and oxygenation (r = -0.514, p = 0.004) was stronger than that between the CT score and oxygenation (r = -0.400, p = 0.028). The most common sonographic findings were abnormalities in the pleural line, white lung, and subpleural consolidation. On the other hand, the CT images revealed dense ground-glass opacities and consolidation patterns classified as CO-RADS 5. Conclusion A weak correlation was found between LUS and CT scores in critically ill COVID-19 pneumonia patients. Also, as both scores increased, oxygenation was detected to be impaired, and such a correlation is more evident with the LUS score.