Effectiveness of mass dengue vaccination with CYD-TDV (Dengvaxia®) in the state of Paraná, Brazil: integrating case-cohort and case-control designs.

Background: CYD-TDV (Dengvaxia®) was the first dengue vaccine approved, launched in Brazil in 2015 for individuals aged 9-44 years. We aimed to estimate the effectiveness of CYD-TDV in preventing symptomatic dengue cases during a campaign targeting individuals aged 15-27 years in selected municipalities in Paraná, Brazil. Additionally, we examined whether a history of dengue, as recorded by the surveillance system, modified the vaccine's effectiveness. Methods: We conducted a case-cohort analysis comparing the frequency of vaccination, with at least one dose of CYD-TDV, in individuals with dengue confirmed by RT-PCR, identified by the surveillance system during 2019 and 2020, with the vaccination coverage in the target population. Moreover, in a case-control design using weighted controls, we assessed the documented history of dengue as a modifier of the vaccine's effectiveness. We used a logistic random-effects regression model, with data clustered in municipalities and incorporating covariates such as the incidence of dengue before the campaign, age, and sex. We calculated vaccine effectiveness (VE) as (1-relative risk) x 100%. Findings: 1869 dengue cases were identified, which had a vaccination frequency significantly lower than the overall vaccination coverage in the target population (50.3% vs. 57.2%, respectively; overall VE: 21.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 13.4%-28.4%). In individuals with a documented history of dengue, vaccination had a VE of 71% (95% CI: 58%-80%) in reducing the incidence of dengue. However, vaccination was not associated with a significant reduction in the overall dengue case risk in individuals without a documented history of dengue (VE: 12%; 95% CI: -21% to 36%). In this last stratum, vaccination was associated with reduced cases due to DENV-1 and DENV-4, but an excess of DENV-2 cases. Interpretation: Vaccination led to a significant reduction in reported dengue cases within the target population. The case-control design suggested that this reduction was primarily driven by the benefits observed in individuals with a documented history of dengue. In endemic regions with limited serological testing facilities, a previous history of dengue diagnosis recorded by epidemiological surveillance could be used to triage candidates for CYD-TDV vaccination. Funding: Research supported by Sanofi.

A case-control study to determine the effectiveness of a tetravalent dengue vaccine in the state of Paraná, Brazil.

Background: The Brazilian state of Paraná conducted a mass vaccination campaign against dengue with the tetravalent attenuated vaccine CYD-TDV. The campaign targeted thirty endemic municipalities. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of CYD-TDV in preventing symptomatic virologically confirmed dengue cases according to specific age groups in five of the municipalities. Methods: A case-control study was carried out in the five most populous municipalities targeted by the vaccination, with a vaccine uptake of 25%. Symptomatic dengue cases were identified by the municipal health departments. The age groups targeted were 15-18 and 19-27 in four municipalities and 9-14 and 28-44 in one municipality. All cases were confirmed by real time reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). For each case, two controls were selected: a neighbourhood control and a workplace or school/college control, matched by age group. A conditional logistic regression model was used to determine the odds ratio for vaccination and the vaccine effectiveness. Findings: Study participants included 618 RT-qPCR-confirmed dengue cases and 1,236 matched controls (with a non-reactive dengue IgM serologic test). Vaccine effectiveness against dengue due to any serotype was 11·1% (95% CI: -19·0%; 33·6%). Effectiveness against DENV-1 was 33·3% (95% CI: -5·0%; 57·6%) and against DENV-2 was -56·7% (95% CI: -142·2%; -5·0%). No DENV-3 was detected. The vaccine was significantly effective in the prevention of DENV-4 cases (VE = 93·3%; 95% CI: 47·7%; 99·2%). Interpretation: CYD-TDV was effective in the prevention of symptomatic cases due to DENV-4, but not due to any serotype. The low dengue seroprevalence in the target population could possibly be related to these results. Funding: This study was supported through a grant to the Sabin Vaccine Institute from Sanofi-Pasteur. Sanofi-Pasteur had no role in the study design, protocol development, data collection, analysis, or publication of results.

Immunogenicity and safety of a tetravalent dengue vaccine and a bivalent HPV vaccine given concomitantly or sequentially in girls aged 9 to 14 years in Mexico.

Dengue is endemic in several regions, and the global incidence is increasing. The recombinant, live, attenuated, tetravalent dengue vaccine (CYD-TDV) is recommended for dengue seropositive individuals ≥ 9 years. Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is recommended for girls aged 9-14 years to prevent HPV infection-related cancers. This study assessed the immunogenicity and safety of a bivalent HPV (types 16 and 18) vaccine and CYD-TDV when co-administered concomitantly or sequentially. This was a Phase IIIb, randomized, open-label, multicenter study in girls aged 9-14 years in Mexico (NCT02979535). Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive three doses of CYD-TDV 6 months apart and two doses of bivalent HPV vaccine either concomitantly with, or 1 month before (sequentially), the first 2 CYD-TDV doses. Antibody levels were measured at baseline and 28-days after each vaccine dose for all participants, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for HPV-16 and HPV-18 antibodies, and a plaque reduction neutralization test for the four dengue serotypes; results are reported only for participants who were seropositive at baseline. Safety was assessed for all randomized participants throughout the study. Of the randomized participants, 305/478 (63.8%) were seropositive for dengue at baseline: 154 in the concomitant group and 151 in the sequential group. After the last HPV vaccine dose, the antibody titers for HPV were comparable in seropositive participants between treatment groups, with between group titer ratios of 0.966 for HPV-16 and 0.999 for HPV-18. After dose 3 of CYD-TDV, antibody titers were comparable for the concomitant and sequential groups across all serotypes, with between-group ratios close to 1 (serotype 1: 0.977; serotype 2: 0.911; serotype 3: 0.921; serotype 4: 0.931). CYD-TDV and a bivalent HPV vaccine administered concomitantly or sequentially in dengue seropositive girls aged 9-14 years elicited comparable immune responses with similar safety profiles.

Evaluation of dengue serological tests available in Puerto Rico for identification of prior dengue infection for prevaccination screening.

We assessed a dengue IgG rapid diagnostic test (RDT) and IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to determine their suitability for dengue prevaccination screening. Each exhibited ≥99% specificity. The RDT demonstrated no Zika cross-reactivity, while the ELISA displayed greater sensitivity. Both could safely guide vaccination in Puerto Rico pending availability of improved serotests.

Optimal dengue vaccination strategies of seropositive individuals.

The dengue vaccine, CYD-TDV (Dengvaxia), has been licensed in 20 countries in Latin America and Southeast Asia beginning in 2015. In April 2018, the World Health Organization (WHO) advised that CYD-TDV should only be administered to individuals with a history of previous dengue virus infection. Using literature-based parameters, a mathematical model of dengue transmission and vaccination was developed to determine the optimal vaccination strategy while considering the effect of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). We computed the optimal vaccination rates under various vaccination costs and serological profiles. We observe that the optimal dengue vaccination rates for seropositive individuals are highest at the initial phase of a vaccination program, requiring intense effort at the early phase of an epidemic. The model shows that even in the presence of ADE, vaccination could reduce dengue incidence and provide population benefits. Specifically, optimal vaccination rates increase with a higher proportion of monotypic seropositive individuals, resulting in a higher impact of vaccination. Even in the presence of ADE and with limited vaccine efficacy, our work provides a population-level perspective on the potential merits of dengue vaccination.

CYD-TDV dengue vaccine: systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, immunogenicity and safety.

INTRODUCTION: Dengue virus (DENV) is a serious global health problem. CYD-TDC (Dengvaxia®) was the first vaccine to gain regulatory approval to try and address this problem. AIM: Summarize all available evidence on the immunogenicity, efficacy and safety of the CYD-TDV dengue vaccine. METHOD: Meta-analysis and systematic review. RESULTS: The best and worst immunogenicity results were for DENV4 and DENV1, respectively. Vaccine efficacy of 60% was derived from studies with participants aged 2-16 years old, with DENV4 and DENV2 presenting the best and worst results, respectively. Erythema and swelling were more frequent with CYD-TDV. No differences were detected for systemic adverse events. CONCLUSION: CYD-TDV showed moderate efficacy in children and adolescents. From the immunogenicity results in adults, we can expect satisfactory efficacy from vaccination in this population.

Análisis de la evidencia sobre eficacia y seguridad de la vacuna de dengue CYD-TDV y su potencial registro e implementación en el Programa de Vacunación Universal de México / Analysis of the evidence on the efficacy and safety of CYD-TDV dengue vaccine and its potential licensing and implementation through Mexico's Universal Vaccination Program

El dengue es un importante problema de salud pública global, que afecta a América Latina y México. Las medidas de prevención y control centradas en vigilancia epidemiológica y control de vectores han resultado parcialmente efectivas y costosas, por lo que el desarrollo de una vacuna contra el dengue ha creado grandes expectativas entre las autoridades sanitarias y las comunidades científicas en el mundo. Sólo la vacuna CYD-TDV, producida por Sanofi-Pasteur, ha sido evaluada en ensayos clínicos controlados fase 3. No obstante a pesar de la importante contribución que esto significa para el desarrollo de una vacuna contra el dengue, los tres estudios clínicos fase 3 de CYD-TDV y el metaanálisis de seguimiento a largo plazo derivado de los mismos proporcionan evidencia de que esta vacuna tiene una eficacia parcial para proteger contra dengue virológicamente confirmado. Al respecto, surgen cuatro consideraciones: a) eficacia adecuada contra infecciones por virus de dengue (DENV) 3 y 4, menor eficacia contra infecciones por DENV 1 y prácticamente nula protección contra infecciones por DENV 2; b) disminución de la eficacia en individuos seronegativos a dengue al inicio de la vacunación; c) 83 y 90% de protección contra hospitalizaciones y formas de dengue grave, respectivamente, a 25 meses de seguimiento, y d) incremento de hospitalización por dengue, en el grupo de vacunados, en niños menores de nueve años de edad al momento de la vacunación, detectado a partir del tercer año de seguimiento. El beneficio de la vacuna CYD-TDV se puede resumir en la protección contra infecciones por DENV 3 y 4, así como en la protección de hospitalizaciones y casos graves en individuos mayores de nueve años y en quienes han tenido infección previa por dengue, pues funciona principalmente como una vacuna de refuerzo. En esta revisión se identificaron elementos sobre eficacia y seguridad de esta vacuna que deben ser tomados en cuenta ante el potencial registro e inclusión en el programa de vacunación en la población mexicana. La evidencia científica disponible sobre la vacuna CYD-TDV demuestra méritos, pero también da lugar a preguntas relevantes que deberían ser contestadas para evaluar apropiadamente el perfil de seguridad del producto, así como las poblaciones blanco de potencial beneficio. Al respecto, consideramos que sería informativo completar el seguimiento indicado de seis años después de iniciar la vacunación, de acuerdo con el protocolo propuesto en los propios estudios del fabricante como una recomendación de la Organización Mundial de la Salud. Al igual que con cualquier nueva vacuna, el potencial registro e implementación de uso de CYD-TDV en el programa nacional de vacunación de México requiere una definición clara de cuál es el balance entre los beneficios y riesgos esperados. En particular, ante una vacuna con eficacia variable y algunas señales de riesgo, en caso de aprobar el registro, se deben desarrollar protocolos de manejo de riesgos detallados que permitan identificar de manera oportuna cualquier evento de salud asociado con la vacunación.

Dengue is a major global public health problem affecting Latin America and Mexico Prevention and control measures, focusing on epidemiological surveillance and vector control, have been partially effective and costly, thus, the development of a vaccine against dengue has created great expectations among health authorities and scientific communities worldwide. The CYD-TDV dengue vaccine produced by Sanofi-Pasteur is the only dengue vaccine evaluated in phase 3 controlled clinical trials. Notwithstanding the significant contribution to the development of a vaccine against dengue, the three phase 3 clinical studies of CYD-TDV and the meta-analysis of the long-term follow up of those studies, have provided evidence that this vaccine exhibited partial vaccine efficacy to protect against virologically confirmed dengue and lead to four considerations: a) adequate vaccine efficacy against dengue virus (DENV) infections 3 and 4, less vaccine efficacy against DENV 1 and no protection against infection by DENV 2; b) decreased vaccine efficacy in dengue seronegative individuals at the beginning of the vaccination; c) 83% and 90% protection against hospitalizations and severe forms of dengue, respectively, at 25 months follow-up; and d) increased hospitalization for dengue in the vaccinated group, in children under nine years of age at the time of vaccination, detected since the third year of follow-up. The benefit of the CYD-TDV vaccine can be summarized in the protection against infection by DENV 3 and 4, as well as protection for hospitalizations and severe cases in people over nine years, who have had previous dengue infection, working mainly as a booster. In this review we identified elements on efficacy and safety of this vaccine that must be taken into account in the licensing process and potential inclusion in the national vaccination program of Mexico. The available scientific evidence on the CYD-TDV vaccine shows merits, but also leads to relevant questions that should be answered to properly assess the safety profile of the product and the target populations of potential benefit. In this regard we consider it would be informative to complete the 6-year follow-up after starting vaccination, according to the company's own study protocol recommended by the World Health Organization. As with any new vaccine, the potential licensing and implementation of the CYD-TDV as part of Mexico's vaccination program, requires a clear definition of the balance between the expected benefits and risks. Particularly with a vaccine with variable efficacy and some signs of risk, in the probable case of licensing, the post-licensed period must involve the development of detailed protocols to immediately identify risks or any health event associated with vaccination.

Assessment of bivalent and tetravalent dengue vaccine formulations in flavivirus-naïve adults in Mexico.

UNLABELLED: Several ChimeriVax-Dengue (CYD)-based vaccination strategies were investigated as potential alternatives to vaccination with tetravalent CYD vaccine (CYD-TDV) in this phase IIa trial conducted in 2008-9 in 150 healthy adults. Participants were randomized and vaccinated on D0 and D105 (± 15 days). One group received bivalent CYD vaccine against serotypes 1 and 3 (CYD-1;3) on day 0 and CYD-2;4 on day 105 (± 15 days). Two groups received an injection at each timepoint of a tetravalent blend of CYD-1;3;4 and a VERO cell derived, live attenuated vaccine against serotype 2 (VDV-2), or the reference CYD-TDV. A fourth group received Japanese encephalitis (JE) vaccine on days -14, -7 and 0, followed by CYD-TDV on day 105. Viraemia was infrequent in all groups. CYD-4 viraemia was most frequent after tetravalent vaccination, while CYD-3 viraemia was most frequent after the first bivalent vaccination. Immunogenicity as assessed by 50% plaque reduction neutralisation test on D28 was comparable after the first injection of either tetravalent vaccine, and increased after the second injection, particularly with the blended CYD-1;3;4/ VDV-2 vaccine. In the bivalent vaccine group, immune response against serotype 3 was highest and the second injection elicited a low immune response against CYD 2 and 4. Immune responses after the first injection of CYD-TDV in the JE-primed group were in general higher than after the first injection in the other groups. All tested regimens were well tolerated without marked differences between groups. Bivalent vaccination showed no advantage in terms of immunogenicity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00740155.