Development of radioiodine-labeled mequitazine for evaluation of hepatic CYP2D activity.

Background: As drug-metabolizing enzyme activities are affected by a variety of factors, such as drug-drug interactions, a method to evaluate drug-metabolizing enzyme activities in real time is needed. In this study, we developed a novel SPECT imaging probe for evaluation of hepatic CYP2D activity. Methods: Iodine-123- and 125-labeled 4-iodobenzylmequitazine (123/125I-BMQ) was synthesized with high labeling and purity. CYP isozymes involved in the metabolism of 125I-BMQ in mouse liver microsomes were evaluated, and the utility of 123/125I-was assessed from biological distribution and SPECT imaging evaluation in normal and CYP2D-inhibited mice. Results: In vitro metabolite analysis using mouse liver microsomes showed that 125I-BMQ is specifically metabolized by CYP2D. Biological distribution and SPECT imaging of 123/125I-BMQ in normal mice showed that injection 123/125I-BMQ accumulated early in the liver and was excreted into the gallbladder and intestines. In CYP2D-inhibited mice, accumulation in the liver was increased, but accumulation in the gallbladder and intestines, the excretory organ, was delayed. Since only metabolites of 125I-BMQ are detected in bile, visualization and measuring of the accumulation of metabolites over time in the intestine, where bile is excreted, could predict the amount of metabolites produced in the body and evaluate CYP2D activity, which would be useful in determining the dosage of various drugs metabolized by CYP2D. Conclusion: 123/125I-BMQ is useful as a SPECT imaging probe for comprehensive and direct assessment of hepatic CYP2D activity in a minimally invasive and simple approach.

Tramadol intoxication in children: An emerging issue.

BACKGROUND: Prescribing tramadol in children raises safety concerns. In Europe, tramadol is still approved and licensed for use in children over 1-3 years of age, depending on the country. In this context, the authors report a case of a tramadol overdose in a 5-year-old-child with a medical history of homozygous sickle cell disease. METHODS: Tramadol and M1 were quantified using liquid chromatography with a diode array detection method. CYP2D6 genotype was determined using a next generation sequencing platform (MISeq, Illumina). RESULTS: Tramadol and M1 were quantified in blood respectively at 5.48 and 1.32µg/mL at admission, at 0.77 and 0.35µg/mL 12hours later, and at 0.32 and 0.18µg/mL 20hours later. The patient was predicted as a CYP2D6 normal metabolizer (*35/*29). CONCLUSION: One of the most important difficulties with the use of tramadol in children relates to its pharmacokinetic (PK) properties. Indeed, tramadol's PK is characterized by a great variability related to: (i) anatomical/physiological factors that impact the volume of distribution (Vd); (ii) CYP2D6 genetic polymorphisms. Considering such an issue is particularly relevant to prevent poisoning. In the reported case, the plasma elimination half-life was estimated at 6.3h, significantly more than those reported in 2-8 year-old children (about 3h). This discrepancy does not seem related to genetic polymorphisms but rather to the Vd. Indeed, the patient was predicted to be a CYP2D6 normal metabolizer (*35/*29). The case presented here highlights the risk associated with the tramadol use in children and emphasizes the importance of considering PK variability among this population. Such variability necessitates greater caution in prescribing tramadol in children and highlights the importance of therapeutic education for families of children treated with this painkiller.

Use of CYP2D6 substrates and inhibitors during pain management with analgesic opioids: Drug-drug interactions that lead to lack of analgesic effectiveness.

BACKGROUND: Several opioids have pharmacogenetic and drug-drug interactions which may compromise their analgesic effectiveness, but are not routinely implemented into supportive pain management. We hypothesized that CYP2D6 phenotypes and concomitant use of CYP2D6 substrates or inhibitors would correlate with opioid analgesic outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted with 263 adult chronic non cancer pain (CNCP) patients from a real-world pain unit under long-term CYP2D6-related opioid treatment (tramadol, hydromorphone, tapentadol or oxycodone). Metabolizer phenotype (ultrarapid [UM], normal [NM], intermediate [IM] or poor [PM]) was determined by the CYP2D6 genotype. The socio-demographic (sex, age, employment status), clinical (pain intensity and relief, neuropathic component, quality of life, disability, anxiety and depression), pharmacological (opioid doses and concomitant pharmacotherapy) and safety (adverse events) variables were recorded. RESULTS: The whole population (66 % female, 65 (14) years old, 70 % retired and 63 % attended for low back pain) were classified as PM (5 %), IM (32 %), NM (56 %) and UM (6 %). Multiple linear and logistic regressions showed higher pain intensity and neuropathic component at younger ages when using any CYP2D6 substrate (p = 0.022) or inhibitor (p = 0.030) drug, respectively, with poorer pain relief when CYP2D6 inhibitors (p=0.030) were present. CONCLUSION: The concomitant use of CYP2D6 substrates or inhibitors during opioid therapy for CNCP may result in lack of analgesic effectiveness. This aspect could be relevant for pharmacological decision making during CNCP management.

Impact of CYP2D6*2A, CYP2D6*4 and CYP3A5*3 genetic polymorphisms on Bisoprolol peak concentration and clinical response in acute coronary syndrome patients.

AIMS: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) represents a major cause of death. Bisoprolol is commonly used in the management of ACS. This study aims to investigate the impact of CYP2D6*2A, CYP2D6*4 and CYP3A5*3 genetic polymorphisms on pharmacokinetics and clinical response of bisoprolol in ACS patients. METHODS: This is an open-label cohort study that included 127 ACS patients and studied the effect of CYP3A5*3, CYP2D6*2A and CYP2D6*4 genotyping using real-time polymerase chain reaction on steady state bisoprolol plasma peak concentration analysed by high performance liquid chromatography-fluorescence detector. RESULTS: Regarding CYP3A5*3, the mean peak bisoprolol concentration for CC, CT and TT genotypes were 4.25 ± 1.20, 3.93 ± 1.10 and 1.79 ± 0.69 ng/mL, respectively (P < .001). Higher systolic (126 ± 5.47 mmHg), diastolic blood pressure (82 ± 2.73 mmHg) and heart rate (97.80 ± 3.03 beats/min) were also observed in CYP3A5*3 TT carriers (P < .05). In CYP2D6*2A, the peak concentration of bisoprolol was lower in CC carriers (3.54 ± 1 ng/mL) compared to GG (4.38 ± 1.25 ng/mL) and GC carriers (4.07 ± 1.29 ng/mL, P = .019). In CYP2D6*4, the mean bisoprolol peak concentration in CC carriers was 3.98 ± 1.31 ng/mL, which was lower than T allele carriers (4.5 ± 0.8, P = .02). No differences in heart rate, systolic, diastolic blood pressure or bisoprolol dose were observed among CYP2D6*2A or CYP2D6*4 variants. Smokers exhibited lower bisoprolol peak concentration (3.96 ± 1.2 ng/mL) compared to nonsmokers (4.55 ± 1.34 ng/mL, P = .037). CONCLUSION: There is an association between CYP3A5*3, CYP2D6*4, CYP2D6*2A variants and bisoprolol peak concentration, which may serve as a guide in the future in choosing the optimum dose of bisoprolol in ACS patients.

Into a Deeper Understanding of CYP2D6's Role in Risperidone Monotherapy and the Potential Side Effects in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders.

Schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) are a group of diseases characterized by one or more abnormal features in perception, thought processing and behavior. Patients suffering from SSD are at risk of developing life-threatening complications. Pharmacogenetic studies have shown promising results on personalized treatment of psychosis. In the current study, 103 patients diagnosed with SSD treated with risperidone as antipsychotic monotherapy were enrolled. Socio-demographics and clinical data were recorded, and laboratory tests and genotyping standard procedure for cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6*4 were performed. Patients were evaluated by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) on admission and at discharge. Based on the reduction in the PANSS total score, subjects were divided into non-responders, partial responders and full responders. Only 11 subjects had a full response to risperidone (10.67%), 53 subjects (51.45%) had a partial response, and 39 participants (37.86%) were non-responders. Patients at first episode psychosis showed significantly higher levels of blood glucose and prolactin levels, while chronic patients showed significantly higher LDL levels. Adverse drug reactions (ADR) such as tremor and stiffness significantly correlated with genetic phenotypes (p = 0.0145). While CYP2D6 showed no impact on treatment response, ADR were significantly more frequent among poor and intermediate metabolizers.

The potential Role of CYP2D6*10(c.100 C>T) Gene Polymorphism in Kidney Injury of Patients with Hypertension Complicated with Non-Elevated Cystatin C.

This study aims to investigate the potential role of CYP2D6*10 (c.100 C>T) gene polymorphism in renal function injury among hypertensive patients without elevated cystatin C. A cohort of hypertensive patients without elevated cystatin C was enrolled between 2021 and 2024 in the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, and their peripheral venous blood was used for total RNA extraction and CYP2D6*10 genotype analysis. Based on kidney injury status, patients were categorized into two groups, hypertensive patients with kidney injury (n = 94) and those without (n = 893). General characteristics such as age, gender and hyperlipemia were compared between the two groups. Multiple genotype models were investigated between the two groups, including allele models, dominant models, recessive models, co-dominant models, and super-dominant models. The results revealed that in the co-dominant gene model (CC vs. CT vs. TT), the risk of hypertension combined with renal injury was lower with the CT genotype compared to the CC genotype (Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.55, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 0.32-0.93, p = 0.02). In the overdominance model (CC + TT vs. CT), the risk of hypertension and renal injury in CC and CT genotypes was 0.42 times lower than that in the CT genotype (OR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.27-0.64, p < 0.001). This study proposes CYP2D610 gene polymorphism as a potential predictor of renal function injury in hypertensive patients with normal cystatin C levels.

Genetic diversity of cytochrome P450 in patients receiving psychiatric care in Greece: a step towards clinical implementation.

Aim: We herein inferred the genetic diversity of CYP450 isoenzymes to predict the percentage of patients who need dose adjustment in drugs used in psychiatry. Materials & methods: Data of 784 Greek patients receiving psychiatric care who were genotyped for CYP2D6, CYP2C19, CYP1A2, CYP3A5 and CYP2C9 isoenzymes were inferred to gene-drug pairs according to the US FDA, Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium and Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group annotations and published literature. Results: Atypical metabolism was found for 36.8% of patients in CYP2D6, 49.2% in CYP2C19, 45% in CYP1A2, 16.7% in CYP3A5 and 41.8% in CYP2C9. Dosage adjustment need was estimated for 10.2% of venlafaxine, 10.0% of paroxetine, 6.4% of sertraline, 30.8% of citalopram, 52.1% of escitalopram, 18.2% of fluvoxamine, 54.1% of tricyclic antidepressants, 16.7% of zuclopenthixol, 10.6% of haloperidol and 13.3% of risperidone treated patients. Conclusion: Clinical psychiatric pharmacogenomic implementation holds promise to improve drug effectiveness and safety.

What is this summary about? Pharmacogenomic dosing guidelines exist for several antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs. However, psychiatric pharmacogenomics is not yet broadly applied in clinical practice. We herein examined the genetics of enzymes involved in the metabolism of psychiatric drugs to predict the percentage of patients who need dose adjustment. Gene­drug pairs were examined according to the US FDA, Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium and Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group annotations for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19, and according to existing literature for the other CYP450 isoenzymes.What were the results? In the total population consisting of 784 patients receiving psychiatric care, 36.8% of patients had atypical metabolism in CYP2D6, 49.2% in CYP2C19, 45% in CYP1A2, 16.7% in CYP3A5 and 41.8% in CYP2C9. Within cases that experienced adverse events, 35% had reduced metabolism in CYP2D6, 16.7% in CYP2C19, and 25% in CYP2C9. In cases showing lack of response, 5.8% were CYP2D6 ultra rapid metabolizers (UMs), 39.3% CYP2C19 UMs, 44.1% CYP1A2 fast metabolizers and 14.2% CYP3A5 expressors. Dosage adjustment need was estimated for 10.2% of venlafaxine, 10.0% of paroxetine, 6.4% of sertraline, 30.8% of citalopram, 52.1% of escitalopram, 18.2% of fluvoxamine, 54.1% of tricyclic antidepressants, 16.7% of zuclopenthixol, 10.6% of haloperidol and 13.3% of risperidone treated patients.What do the results mean? CYP450 genotyping can predict interindividual differences in drug response in the field of psychiatry. Clinical psychiatric pharmacogenomic implementation holds promise to improve drug effectiveness and safety.

Combined effect of CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 genotypes on escitalopram serum concentration and its metabolic ratio in a European patient population.

AIMS: The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of CYP2D6 genotype on exposure and metabolism of escitalopram in patients stratified by CYP2C19 genotype in a large real-world population. METHODS: Patients were included from a therapeutic drug monitoring service if they had measured serum concentration of escitalopram and the metabolite, N-desmethyl escitalopram, and performed CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 genotyping. Patients were divided into 16 combined genotype-predicted phenotype subgroups (poor [PM], intermediate [IM], normal [NM] and ultrarapid metabolizers [UM]) of CYP2C19/CYP2D6. The concentration-to-dose (CD) ratio and metabolite-to-parent ratio (metabolic ratio) of escitalopram were compared across subgroups using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's test with CYP2D6 NMs as the reference group. RESULTS: A total of 5067 patients were included in the study. A stepwise increase in escitalopram CD ratio by decreasing CYP2D6 activity was observed in all CYP2C19 subgroups, except for in CYP2C19 UMs. The percentage differences in escitalopram CD ratio between CYP2D6 PMs and NMs were 24% in CYP2C19 NMs (P < .001), 28% in CYP2C19 IMs (P < .001) and 31% in CYP2C19 PMs (P = .04). As for the CD ratio, CYP2D6 genotype effect on metabolic ratio increased stepwise by decreasing CYP2C19 metabolism. CONCLUSIONS: CYP2D6 genotype is of significant importance for the individual variation in escitalopram pharmacokinetics. The most relevant increase in escitalopram concentration is seen in individuals with decreased and/or absent CYP2C19 activity. By combining CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 genotypes, the optimal dose for patients may be predicted with greater precision than for CYP2C19 genotype alone.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Atogepant Co-administered with Quinidine Gluconate in Healthy Participants: A Phase 1, Open-Label, Drug-Drug Interaction Study.

Atogepant, an oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, is approved for the preventive treatment of migraine. Atogepant is a substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), breast cancer resistance protein, organic anion transporting polypeptide transporters, and cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 and 2D6. Quinidine is a strong P-gp and CYP2D6 inhibitor. A phase 1 open-label study evaluated the effect of P-gp and CYP2D6 inhibition by quinidine on the pharmacokinetics of atogepant, and the safety and tolerability of atogepant and quinidine gluconate (QG) when co-administered and when given alone in 33 healthy adults. There was no significant change in the atogepant maximum plasma concentration with QG co-administration. The overall systemic exposure, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (from time 0 to time t or to infinity), of atogepant increased by 25% when co-administered with QG. However, such an increase was not considered clinically relevant. Atogepant did not alter the mean plasma concentration of quinidine at steady state. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was highest when QG was administered alone (42.4%), which was primarily due to QT prolongation. Most TEAEs reported were mild in severity and resolved within 1-2 days. Co-administration of atogepant with QG did not result in any unexpected tolerability findings in this phase 1 study in healthy participants. The increase in atogepant exposure during QG co-administration could be due to inhibition of CYP2D6 (a minor contributor to atogepant clearance) as well as inhibition of P-gp.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Sertraline in Psychiatric and Substance Use Disorders.

This study aimed to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of sertraline in Mexican patients with psychiatric and substance use disorders. Fifty-nine patients (13 to 76 years old) treated with doses of sertraline between 12.5 and 100 mg/day were included. Plasma sertraline concentrations were determined in blood samples and five of the main substances of abuse were determined by rapid tests in urine samples. Demographic, clinical, and pharmacogenetic factors were also evaluated. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using NONMEM software with first-order conditional estimation method. A one-compartment model with proportional residual error adequately described the sertraline concentrations versus time. CYP2D6*2 polymorphism and CYP2C19 phenotypes significantly influenced sertraline clearance, which had a population mean value of 66 L/h in the final model. The absorption constant and volume of distribution were fixed at 0.855 1/h and 20.2 L/kg, respectively. The model explained 11.3% of the interindividual variability in sertraline clearance. The presence of the CYP2D6*2 polymorphism caused a 23.1% decrease in sertraline clearance, whereas patients with intermediate and poor phenotype of CYP2C19 showed 19.06% and 48.26% decreases in sertraline clearance, respectively. The model was internally validated by bootstrap and visual predictive check. Finally, stochastic simulations were performed to propose dosing regimens to achieve therapeutic levels that contribute to improving treatment response.

CYP2D6 inhibition by diphenhydramine leading to fatal hydrocodone overdose.

OBJECTIVES: Fatal drug overdoses often involve multiple co-intoxicants, including opioids. Hydrocodone, the most prescribed opioid for pain management, is metabolized to the active metabolite hydromorphone by hepatic CYP2D6. Inhibition of CYP2D6 by other compounds can disrupt the analgesic properties of hydrocodone and extend its half-life. Diphenhydramine is an over-the-counter cold medication and is known to inhibit CYP2D6 activity. CASE PRESENTATION: A woman in her late 50s was prescribed hydrocodone/acetaminophen (Norco® 10/325). Days before her death, she began taking diphenhydramine for cold symptoms. A post-mortem toxicology report detected the following compounds by High Performance Liquid Chromatography/Time of Flight-Mass Spectrometry (LC/TOF-MS) analysis: acetaminophen (14 µg/mL), hydrocodone (410 ng/mL), dihydrocodeine (24 ng/mL), and diphenhydramine (150 ng/mL). Hydromorphone was not detected (<2 ng/mL). All compounds were detected in therapeutic concentrations, except for hydrocodone, which was present at lethal concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights a fatal drug-drug interaction between hydrocodone and diphenhydramine. The estimated total body burden of hydrocodone was 6- to 12-fold higher than acetaminophen, which is unexpected, as these two drugs were administered as a single formulation and have similar half-lives. Furthermore, hydromorphone was undetectable. Taken together, these findings are highly suggestive of a fatal opioid overdose precipitated by diphenhydramine.

The impacts of natural product miltirone and the CYP2D6 pharmacogenetic phenotype on fluoxetine metabolism.

Introduction: To study the effects of drug-induced CYP2D6 activity inhibition and genetic polymorphisms on fluoxetine metabolism, rat liver microsomes (RLMs) and SD rats were used to investigate the potential drug‒drug interactions (DDIs), and CYP2D6 http://muchong.com/t-10728934-1 recombinant baculosomes were prepared and subjected to catalytic reactivity studies. Methods and Results: All analytes were detected by ultraperformance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC‒MS/MS). After screening for 27 targeted natural products, miltirone was identified as having obvious inhibitory effect on fluoxetine metabolism in RLMs. In vivo, the concentration of fluoxetine in rat blood increased markedly after miltirone administration. The molecular docking results showed that miltirone bound more strongly to CYP2D6 than fluoxetine, and PHE120 may be the key residue leading to the inhibition of CYP2D6-mediated fluoxetine N-demethylation by miltirone. In terms of the genetic polymorphism of CYP2D6 on fluoxetine metabolism, the intrinsic clearance values of most variants were significantly altered. Among these variants, CYP2D6*92 and CYP2D6*96/Q424X were found to be catalytically inactive for fluoxetine metabolism, five variants (CYP2D6*89/L142S, *97/F457L, *R497, *V342M and *R344Q) exhibited markedly increased clearance values (>125.07%) and seven variants (CYP2D6*2, *10, *87/A5V, *93/T249P, *E215K, *R25Q and *R440C) exhibited significantly decreased clearance values (from 6.62% to 66.79%) compared to those of the wild-type. Conclusion: Our results suggest that more attention should be given to subjects in the clinic who take fluoxetine and also carry one of these infrequent CYP2D6 alleles or are coadministered drugs containing miltirone.

Recurrent high creatine kinase levels under clozapine treatment - a case report assessing a suspected adverse drug reaction.

Suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) during treatment with clozapine often prompt therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in clinical practice. Currently, there is no official recommendation for pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing in the context of clozapine therapy. In this case report, we demonstrate and discuss the challenges of interpreting PGx and TDM results highlighting the possibilities and limitations of both analytical methods. A 36-year-old male patient with catatonic schizophrenia was treated with clozapine. He experienced multiple hospitalizations due to elevated creatine kinase (CK) levels (up to 9000 U/L, reference range: 30-200 U/L). With no other medical explanation found, physicians suspected clozapine-induced ADRs. However, plasma levels of clozapine were consistently low or subtherapeutic upon admission, prompting us to conduct a PGx analysis and retrospectively review the patient's TDM data, progress notes, and discharge reports. We investigated two possible hypotheses to explain the symptoms despite low clozapine plasma levels: Hypothesis i. suggested the formation and accumulation of a reactive intermediate metabolite due to increased activity in cytochrome P450 3A5 and reduced activity in glutathione S-transferases 1, leading to myotoxicity. Hypothesis ii. proposed under-treatment with clozapine, resulting in ineffective clozapine levels, leading to a rebound effect with increased catatonic symptoms and CK levels. After considering both data sources (PGx and TDM), hypothesis ii. appeared more plausible. By comprehensively assessing all available TDM measurements and examining them in temporal correlation with the drug dose and clinical symptoms, we observed that CK levels normalized when clozapine plasma levels were raised to the therapeutic range. This was achieved through hospitalization and closely monitored clozapine intake. Therefore, we concluded that the symptoms were not an ADR due to altered clozapine metabolism but rather the result of under-treatment. Interpreting TDM and PGx results requires caution. Relying solely on isolated PGx or single TDM values can result in misinterpretation of drug reactions. We recommend considering the comprehensive patient history, including treatment, dosages, laboratory values, clinic visits, and medication adherence.

Nardosinone relieves metabolic-associated fatty liver disease and promotes energy metabolism through targeting CYP2D6.

BACKGROUND: Nardosinone, a major extract of Rhizoma nardostachyos, plays a vital role in sedation, neural stem cell proliferation, and protection of the heart muscle. However, the huge potential of nardosinone in regulating lipid metabolism and gut microbiota has not been reported, and its potential mechanism has not been studied. PURPOSE: To explore the regulation of nardosinone on liver lipid metabolism and gut microbiota. METHODS: In this study, the role of nardosinone in lipid metabolism was investigated in vitro and in vivo by adding it to mouse feed and HepG2 cell culture medium. And 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used to explore its regulatory effect on gut microbiota. RESULTS: Results showed that nardosinone could improve HFD-induced liver injury and abnormal lipid metabolism by promoting mitochondrial energy metabolism in hepatocytes, alleviating oxidative stress damage, and regulating the composition of the gut microbiota. Mechanistically, combined with network pharmacology and reverse docking analysis, it was predicted that CYP2D6 was the target of nardosinone, and the binding was verified by cellular thermal shift assay (CETSA). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights a novel mechanism function of nardosinone in regulating lipid metabolism and gut microbiota. It also predicts and validates CYP2D6 as a previously unknown regulatory target, which provides new possibilities for the application of nardosinone and the treatment of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease.

Dose adjustment of paroxetine based on CYP2D6 activity score inferred metabolizer status in Chinese Han patients with depressive or anxiety disorders: a prospective study and cross-ethnic meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the impact of CYP2D6 metabolism on paroxetine, a widely used antidepressant, is essential for precision dosing. METHODS: We conducted an 8-week, multi-center, single-drug, 2-week wash period prospective cohort study in 921 Chinese Han patients with depressive or anxiety disorders (ChiCTR2000038462). We performed CYP2D6 genotyping (single nucleotide variant and copy number variant) to derive the CYP2D6 activity score and evaluated paroxetine treatment outcomes including steady-state concentration, treatment efficacy, and adverse reaction. CYP2D6 metabolizer status was categorized into poor metabolizers (PMs), intermediate metabolizers (IMs), extensive metabolizers (EMs), and ultrarapid metabolizers (UMs). The influence of CYP2D6 metabolic phenotype on paroxetine treatment outcomes was examined using multiple regression analysis and cross-ethnic meta-analysis. The therapeutic reference range of paroxetine was estimated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. FINDINGS: After adjusting for demographic factors, the steady-state concentrations of paroxetine in PMs, IMs, and UMs were 2.50, 1.12, and 0.39 times that of EMs, with PM and UM effects being statistically significant (multiple linear regression, P = 0.03 and P = 0.04). Sex and ethnicity influenced the comparison between IMs and EMs. Moreover, poor efficacy of paroxetine was associated with UM, and a higher risk of developing adverse reactions was associated with lower CYP2D6 activity score. Lastly, cross-ethnic meta-analysis suggested dose adjustments for PMs, IMs, EMs, and UMs in the East Asian population to be 35%, 40%, 143%, and 241% of the manufacturer's recommended dose, and 62%, 68%, 131%, and 159% in the non-East Asian population. INTERPRETATION: Our findings advocate for precision dosing based on the CYP2D6 metabolic phenotype, with sex and ethnicity being crucial considerations in this approach. FUNDING: National Natural Science Foundation of China; Academy of Medical Sciences Research Unit.

Frequency of pharmacogenomic variants affecting efficacy and safety of anti-cancer drugs in a south Asian population from Sri Lanka.

BACKGROUND: Therapy with anti-cancer drugs remain the cornerstone of treating cancer. The effectiveness and safety of anti-cancer drugs vary significantly among individuals due to genetic factors influencing the drug response and metabolism. Data on the pharmacogenomic variations in Sri Lankans related to anti-cancer therapy is sparse. As current treatment guidelines in Sri Lanka often do not consider local pharmacogenomic variants, this study aimed to explore the diversity of pharmacogenomic variants in the Sri Lankan population to pave the way for personalized treatment approaches and improve patient outcomes. METHODS: Pharmacogenomic data regarding variant-drug pairs of genes CYP2D6, DPYD, NUDT15, EPAS1, and XRCC1 with clinical annotations labelled as evidence levels 1A-2B were obtained from the Pharmacogenomics Knowledgebase database. Their frequencies in Sri Lankans were obtained from an anonymized database that was derived from 541 Sri Lankans who underwent exome sequencing at the Human Genetics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo. Variations in DPYD, NUDT15, and EPAS1 genes are related to increased toxicity to fluoropyrimidines, mercaptopurines, and sorafenib respectively. Variations in CYP2D6 and XRCC1 genes are related to changes in efficacy of tamoxifen and platinum compounds, respectively. Minor allele frequencies of these variants were calculated and compared with other populations. RESULTS: MAFs of rs1065852 c.100 C > T (CYP2D6), rs3918290 c.1905 + 1G > A (DPYD), rs56038477 c.1236G > A (DPYD), rs7557402 c.1035-7 C > G (EPAS1), rs116855232 c.415 C > T (NUDT15*3), and rs25487 c.1196 A > G (XRCC1) were: 12.9% [95%CI:10.9-14.9], 1.5% [95%CI:0.8-2.2], 1.2% [95%CI:0.5-1.8], 37.7% [95%CI:34.8-40.6], 8.3% [95%CI:6.7-10.0], and 64.0% [95%CI:61.1-66.8], respectively. Frequencies of rs1065852 c.100 C > T (CYP2D6), rs7557402 c.1035-7 C > G (EPAS1), and rs25487 (XRCC1) were significantly lower in Sri Lankans, while frequencies of rs116855232 c.415 C > T (NUDT15*3) and rs56038477 c.1236G > A (DPYD) were significantly higher in Sri Lankans when compared to some Western and Asian populations. CONCLUSION: Sri Lankans are likely to show lower toxicity risk with sorafenib (rs7557402 c.84,131 C > G) and, higher toxicity risk with fluoropyrimidines (rs56038477 c.1236G > A) and mercaptopurine (rs116855232 c.415 C > T), and reduced effectiveness with tamoxifen (rs1065852 c.100 C > T) and platinum compounds (rs25487). These findings highlight the potential contribution of these genetic variations to the individual variability in anti-cancer dosage requirements among Sri Lankans.

Association of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 metabolizer status with switching and discontinuing antidepressant drugs: an exploratory study.

BACKGROUND: Tailoring antidepressant drugs (AD) to patients' genetic drug-metabolism profile is promising. However, literature regarding associations of ADs' treatment effect and/or side effects with drug metabolizing genes CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 has yielded inconsistent results. Therefore, our aim was to longitudinally investigate associations between CYP2D6 (poor, intermediate, and normal) and CYP2C19 (poor, intermediate, normal, and ultrarapid) metabolizer-status, and switching/discontinuing of ADs. Next, we investigated whether the number of perceived side effects differed between metabolizer statuses. METHODS: Data came from the multi-site naturalistic longitudinal cohort Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA). We selected depression- and/or anxiety patients, who used AD at some point in the course of the 9 years follow-up period (n = 928). Medication use was followed to assess patterns of AD switching/discontinuation over time. CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 alleles were derived using genome-wide data of the NESDA samples and haplotype data from the PharmGKB database. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to investigate the association of metabolizer status with switching/discontinuing ADs. Mann-Whitney U-tests were conducted to compare the number of patient-perceived side effects between metabolizer statuses. RESULTS: No significant associations were observed of CYP metabolizer status with switching/discontinuing ADs, nor with the number of perceived side effects. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence for associations between CYP metabolizer statuses and switching/discontinuing AD, nor with side effects of ADs, suggesting that metabolizer status only plays a limited role in switching/discontinuing ADs. Additional studies with larger numbers of PM and UM patients are needed to further determine the potential added value of pharmacogenetics to guide pharmacotherapy.

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling to predict the pharmacokinetics of codeine in different CYP2D6 phenotypes.

Objectives: Codeine, a prodrug used as an opioid agonist, is metabolized to the active product morphine by CYP2D6. This study aimed to establish physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models of codeine and morphine and explore the influence of CYP2D6 genetic polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of codeine and morphine. Methods: An initial PBPK modeling of codeine in healthy adults was established using PK-Sim® software and subsequently extrapolated to CYP2D6 phenotype-related PBPK modeling based on the turnover frequency (Kcat) of CYP2D6 for different phenotype populations (UM, EM, IM, and PM). The mean fold error (MFE) and geometric mean fold error (GMFE) methods were used to compare the differences between the predicted and observed values of the pharmacokinetic parameters to evaluate the accuracy of PBPK modeling. The validated models were then used to support dose safety for different CYP2D6 phenotypes. Results: The developed and validated CYP2D6 phenotype-related PBPK model successfully predicted codeine and morphine dispositions in different CYP2D6 phenotypes. Compared with EMs, the predicted AUC0-∞ value of morphine was 98.6% lower in PMs, 60.84% lower in IMs, and 73.43% higher in UMs. Morphine plasma exposure in IMs administered 80 mg of codeine was roughly comparable to that in EMs administered 30 mg of codeine. CYP2D6 UMs may start dose titration to achieve an optimal individual regimen and avoid a single dose of over 20 mg. Codeine should not be used in PMs for pain relief, considering its insufficient efficacy. Conclusion: PBPK modeling can be applied to explore the dosing safety of codeine and can be helpful in predicting the effect of CYP2D6 genetic polymorphisms on drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with codeine in the future.

Effects of CYP2D6 gene polymorphism on plasma concentration and therapeutic effect of olanzapine.

This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between gene polymorphisms of metabolic enzymes, particularly the CYP2D6 gene, and the plasma concentration of olanzapine, as well as treatment response in patients with chronic schizophrenia. We recruited olanzapine-treated patients and examined their plasma olanzapine levels. Additionally, a common mutation site within each of the nine exons of the full-length CYP2D6 sequence was assayed. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, and Overall Clinical Impression were used to assess schizophrenic symptoms, whereas the Barnes Akathisia Scale and Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale were used to evaluate adverse effects. The results showed no significant differences in plasma olanzapine concentrations, treatment response, or the occurrence of adverse effects among different CYP2D6 genotypes. However, an association between olanzapine concentrations and improvement in clinical symptoms and adverse reactions was observed. In conclusion, the CYP2D6 genotype did not significantly impact plasma olanzapine concentrations, treatment response, or the occurrence of adverse effects.

Influence of CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 on side effects of aripiprazole and risperidone: A systematic review.

Variability in hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes such as 2C19 and 2D6 may influence side-effect and efficacy outcomes for antipsychotics. Aripiprazole and risperidone are two commonly prescribed antipsychotics, metabolized primarily through CYP2D6. Here, we aimed to provide an overview of the effect of CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 on side-effects of aripiprazole and risperidone, and expand on existing literature by critically examining methodological issues associated with pharmacogenetic studies. A PRISMA compliant search of six electronic databases (Pubmed, PsychInfo, Embase, Central, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) identified pharmacogenetic studies on aripiprazole and risperidone. 2007 publications were first identified, of which 34 were included. Quality of literature was estimated using Newcastle-Ottowa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS) and revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The average NOS score was 5.8 (range: 3-8) for risperidone literature and 5 for aripiprazole (range: 4-6). All RCTs on aripiprazole were rated as high risk of bias, and four out of six for risperidone literature. Study populations ranged from healthy volunteers to inpatient individuals in psychiatric units and included adult and pediatric samples. All n = 34 studies examined CYP2D6. Only one study genotyped for CYP2C19 and found a positive association with neurological side-effects of risperidone. Most studies did not report any relationship between CYP2D6 and any side-effect outcome. Heterogeneity between and within studies limited the ability to synthesize data and draw definitive conclusions. Studies lacked statistical power due to small sample size, selective genotyping methods, and study design. Large-scale randomized trials with multiple measurements, providing robust evidence on this topic, are suggested.