CTA and DSA findings in carotid blowout syndrome: An overview and approach to imaging diagnosis.

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is a potentially life-threatening complication in patients suffering head and neck cancer, in which rupture of the carotid artery and/or its branches can rapidly lead to life-threatening hemorrhage, shock, and death. CBS is categorized into three subtypes, which are characterized by extent of disease as evidenced by clinical presentation, physical exam findings, and imaging characteristics. Given the high morbidity and mortality associated with CBS, prompt recognition and treatment remains pivotal, as early intervention is associated with longer survival and lower complication rates. In turn, we present an overview of the hallmark imaging findings of CBS through a retrospective review of our institution's findings of these characteristic imaging findings in all patients who underwent evaluation and management of CBS at our facility across a 10-year period.

Endovascular intervention for carotid blowout syndrome and predictors of recurrence: A retrospective and multicenter cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is a potentially life-threatening complication of head and neck cancer and associated treatment. In this study, we assess the safety and efficacy of deconstructive and reconstructive procedures with a focus on CBS recurrence. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database and identified 80 consecutive neurointerventions for CBS from 2016 to 2020. Patients were divided into 2 groups: deconstructive embolization (68 patients) and reconstructive stenting (12 patients). A comparative analysis was performed between the two groups. RESULTS: The CBS recurrence rate was 23.8 % with 84.2 % of recurrences occurring within 90 days of the primary event. The median time to rebleeding was 8.0 days (IQR: 2.0 - 28.5) with a mortality rate of 26.3 %. There was no significant difference in rates of peri-operative ischemic stroke (1.5 % vs. 0 %, p=0.672) or peri-operative mortality (1.5 % vs. 0 %, p=0.670). CBS recurrence was significantly higher in the reconstructive group (58.3 % vs. 17.6 %, p=0.002). On multivariate analysis, reconstructive stenting independently predicted rebleeding (adjusted hazard ratio 8.31, 95 % CI: 2.34-29.59, p=0.001). There was no significant association between CBS recurrence and pre-operative (p=0.600) or post-operative (p=0.275) anticoagulant/antiplatelet use. CONCLUSION: CBS remains a challenging and potentially catastrophic complication of head and neck cancers. Reconstructive procedures, including stenting, predicted CBS recurrence independent of bleeding site or tumor invasion. Postoperative surveillance based on time intervals to CBS recurrence and engineering advancements including improved vessel reconstruction devices have the potential to reduce rehemorrhage rates and improve patient outcomes. Further clinical investigations amongst larger cohorts are needed.

Risk factors of post-irradiation carotid blowout syndrome in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is a severe complication of radiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). This study is aimed at analyzing risk factors of post-irradiation CBS in patients with NPC. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 660 patients with NPC between 2006 and 2019. The patients were divided into those with and without CBS, and their characteristics and outcomes were evaluated. Independent predictors of CBS were determined by multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: We identified 17 NPC patients with CBS in our study. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, lower body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.018), tumor encasement (P = 0.039), local recurrence (P = 0.006), and skull base osteoradionecrosis (P < 0.001) were independent predictors of CBS, and a predictive equation model was established. Log-rank test revealed that patients with low BMI, tumor encasement of carotid vessels, local recurrence, and skull base osteoradionecrosis all exhibited shorter CBS-free time (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that low BMI, tumor encasement, local recurrence, and skull base osteoradionecrosis were independent predictors for CBS in NPC patients. Physicians can use these factors for the early detection and prevention of CBS.

Quantitative diagnosis of carotid blowout syndrome with CT perfusion: Carotid blowout syndrome CTP quantitative diagnosis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is a potentially fatal disease. The CBS diagnosis mainly relies on subjective observations and the quantitative diagnotic method was not well established. This study aimed to diagnose CBS severity by computed tomography perfusion (CTP) parameters with different region-of-interest (ROI) models. MATERIALS AND METHOD: We prospectively recruited CBS patients between February 1, 2018 and July 31, 2023 in a tertiary medical center, and CTP was performed using the same 128-detector CT machine. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and elective endovascular intervention were performed within 3 days post-CTP for diagnosis confirmation and treatments. CBS severity was classified into ongoing (threatened + impending) or acute CBS based on DSA findings and clinical features. Pericarotid soft-tissue (PCST) CTP parameters, including blood flow (BF), blood volume (BV), mean transit time (MTT) and flow extraction product (FEP), were evaluated and correlated on DSA. We depicted models A, B and C for the small focal lesion in 1 cm of PCST, 1 cm around PCST and the whole PCST respectively. RESULTS: CTP images of 110 patients (77 ongoing (45 threatened + 32 impending); 33 acute) were analyzed. Pericarotid BV (1.8 ± 1.2vs.3.5 ± 2.0; p < 0.001) in Model A and BF in Model B (42.6 ± 11.0vs.50.9 ± 20.4; p = 0.031) were lower in acute-CBS than in ongoing-CBS patients. Subgroup analysis demonstrated lower BV in acute (1.8 ± 1.2) compared with threatened (3.7 ± 2.3; p < 0.001; p < 0.001) and impending (3.2 ± 1.6; p = 0.009) CBS patients in Model A. CONCLUSION: CBS severity can be quantitatively diagnosed by pericarotid soft-tissue CTP parameters. In Model A (small focus), BV was capable of differentiating acute CBS from other subtypes, demonstrating its potential role as a CBS imaging biomarker.

Management of post-radiation carotid blowout syndrome in patients with head and neck cancer: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication that can occur in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC), especially with a history of radiotherapy. This study aimed to review and initially compare managements for post-radiation CBS in patients with HNC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of published studies was performed. Information including management, survival, and complication were collected. RESULTS: A total of 39 articles and 917 cases were included in the systematic review. The interval between radiation therapy and CBS ranged from 1.2 years to 17.8 years. The managements of CBS included embolization, stent, bypass surgery, surgical ligation, electrocoagulation, flap coverage, arterial repair, and nasopharyngeal packing. The cumulative 30-day, 1-year, and 2-year overall survival rates were 85.2 %, 48.9 %, and 37.0 %, respectively, with a median survival time of 11.3 months. Disease progression and rebleeding were the most common death causes. The lowest rebleeding rate and neurologic complications rate were presented in cases receiving bypass surgery at 1.4 % and 10.8 %, respectively. The highest rebleeding rate of 35.6 % was showed in cases underwent stent, and the highest neurologic complications rate of 32.0 % was showed in cases underwent ligation. CONCLUSION: Post-radiation CBS in patients with HNC had a low survival rate and high complication rate. Rebleeding and neurologic complication were common complications. Endovascular embolization and stent were the mainstream management, and bypass surgery presented a promising outcome in survival and complication for selected patients.

Incidence of Carotid Blowout Syndrome in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer after Radiation Therapy: A Cohort Study.

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is a rare yet life-threatening complication that occurs after radiation therapy (RT). This study aimed to determine the incidence of CBS in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing contemporary RT and to explore potential discrepancies in the risk of CBS between nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) and non-NPC patients. A total of 1084 patients with HNC who underwent RT between 2013 and 2023 were included in the study. All patients were under regular follow-ups at the radio-oncology department, and underwent annual contrast-enhanced computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging for cancer recurrence surveillance. Experienced neuroradiologists and vascular neurologists reviewed the recruited patients' images. Patients were further referred to the neurology department for radiation vasculopathy evaluation. The primary outcome of this study was CBS. Patients were categorized into NPC and non-NPC groups and survival analysis was employed to compare the CBS risk between the two groups. A review of the literature on CBS incidence was also conducted. Among the enrolled patients, the incidence of CBS in the HNC, NPC, and non-NPC groups was 0.8%, 0.9%, and 0.7%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant difference between the NPC and non-NPC groups (p = 0.34). Combining the findings for our cohort with those of previous studies revealed that the cumulative incidence of CBS in patients with HNC is 5% (95% CI = 3-7%) after both surgery and RT, 4% (95% CI = 2-6%) after surgery alone, and 5% (95% CI = 3-7%) after RT alone. Our findings indicate a low incidence of CBS in patients with HNC undergoing contemporary RT. Patients with NPC may have a CBS risk close to that of non-NPC patients. However, the low incidence of CBS could be a potentially cause of selection bias and underestimation bias.

[Treatment strategy of carotid blowout syndrome after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma].

Objective:To investigate the treatment of internal carotid artery rupture after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Methods:The clinical data of 7 patients with internal carotid artery rupture after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma from March 2020 to March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Results:Skull base osteonecrosis with infection occurred in 4 cases, and tumor recurrence with infection in 3 cases. DSA showed that internal carotid artery rupture was located in the internal carotid artery petrosal segment in 6 cases, and in the paravicular segment in 1 case. Balloon occlusion test（BOT） was performed in 6 patients, of which 3 passed and 3 failed. Vascular treatment included internal carotid artery embolization（4 cases）, false aneurysm embolization 1 case（rebleeding）, coated stent 1 case（rebleeding）, muscle compression during operation（1 case）. Patients with rebleeding received high-flow bypass. Three cases developed cerebral infarction after embolization without severe sequelae after treatment, and no death occurred within 90 days. After bleeding control, all 3 patients with cranial base necrosis received surgical treatment to remove the necrotic bone and tissue flap repair, and 1 patient with recurrence received gamma knife and targeted therapy, 1 patient received immune and surgical therapy, and 1 patient received immune and targeted therapy. Conclusion:Rupture and hemorrhage of internal carotid artery after radiotherapy is related to tumor invasion, tissue injury and local infection after radiotherapy. For those caused by tumor invasion, it is recommended to sacrifice the responsible vessels. For those caused by infection, emergency surgery is recommended and blood vessels preserved. Emergency vascular occlusion remains a life-saving option.

Endovascular Treatment for Primary Tumor Hemorrhage in Oropharyngeal Carcinoma: A Report of Two Cases.

Acute arterial hemorrhage is a damaging and sometimes lethal complication that occurs in patients with head and neck cancer. However, achieving hemostasis can be challenging because of the difficulty in applying pressure in the throat and oral cavity. In this context, endovascular treatment (ET) has been performed in recent years. This report aims to describe the benefits of ET for acute bleeding. Additionally, our findings emphasize the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of tumor-related bleeding, not only for immediate life-saving benefits but also for the potential resumption of irradiation and chemotherapy, which can lead to favorable long-term prognoses in some instances. We describe two cases of primary tumor bleeding where treatment was successful with ET. Neurosurgeons performed these treatments, and effective hemostasis was achieved in both cases. No complications or rebleeding were observed. ET is a better option for hemorrhage from oropharyngeal tumors than for hemorrhage from the main trunk of the carotid artery. The efficacy of ET is dependent on the vessels involved, and early identification of the culprit artery can predict the prognosis. ET should be considered an option for acute arterial hemorrhage in head and neck cancer.

Emergency Management and Nursing Considerations of Carotid Blowout Syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Carotid blowout syndrome is a rare but fatal complication often witnessed secondary to treating patients with head and neck cancer. It occurs when damage and necrosis lead to the carotid artery wall rupture. The symptoms encountered in these patients range from asymptomatic to cardiac arrest. Here, we present 5 cases of carotid blowout syndrome in the emergency department. CASE PRESENTATIONS: Patients demonstrated symptoms ranging from subtle bleeding to hemodynamic instability, highlighting the diverse nature of carotid blowout syndrome in this population. Notably, while all patients had a history of radiotherapy, some had additional risk factors for carotid blowout syndrome, including prior surgery (n = 2), malnutrition (n = 3), and tracheostomies (n = 2). Definitive diagnoses were established through clinical evaluation and computed tomography angiography. Immediate interventions included bleeding control, resuscitation, and consultations with relevant specialties. Four patients underwent interventional radiology procedures, and 1 patient received otolaryngology care. While 2 patients recovered completely, 1 died in the emergency department, and 1 in the intensive care unit. One patient's clinical course was complicated by a stroke. CONCLUSION: The approach to the carotid blowout syndrome patient includes complex steps that proceed in a multidisciplinary manner, starting from triage until discharge. Emergency nurses play crucial roles at every stage. They should be aware of carotid blowout syndrome when evaluating patients with head and neck cancer presenting with bleeding. When treating these patients, emergency nurses should be ready for airway interventions, bleeding control, and massive transfusion protocol. In this context, the multifaceted approaches made by nurses contribute significantly to carotid blowout syndrome management in the emergency department.

Clinical and MRI risk factors predicting post-irradiation carotid blowout syndrome in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical and imaging features of nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) complicated by acute carotid blowout syndrome (CBS), analyze the risk factors for CBS, and improve diagnostic vigilance for early intervention. METHODS: This retrospective review was conducted between January 2003 and May 2023. Altogether, 49 patients with post-irradiation NPC with CBS and 49 patients without CBS as control group were enrolled. The condition of the patients when CBS occurred was reviewed. Patient characteristics of the CBS and control groups were compared, and binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for CBS. RESULTS: All patients in the CBS group were conscious, and 41 patients had a Karnofsky performance assessment scale score of ≥ 70. After interventional therapy, 43 patients survived (the mean survival time of patients after CBS was 3.2 ± 2.1 years). Compared with the control group, the CBS group had a higher incidence of sphenoid sinusitis (81% vs. 52.4%), osteonecrosis (82.9% vs. 51.2%), artery exposure (29.3% vs. 4.9%), and internal carotid artery injury (61% vs. 29.3%). Osteonecrosis and artery exposure were selected as important risk factor for CBS, with p-values of 0.016 and 0.031, respectively. CONCLUSION: CBS is an important factor that affects the survival of patients with NPC. If internal carotid artery injury, artery exposure, sphenoid sinusitis, and osteonecrosis are present, especially the latter two signs, the possibility of CBS should be considered.

Exposed Embolic Coils Observed in a 64-Year-Old Male With Head and Neck Cancer Following Transarterial Embolization for Carotid Blowout Syndrome.

Background: Delayed migration and exposure of embolic coils is a rare complication of endovascular therapy for carotid blowout syndrome. Methods: A 64-year-old man with recurrent tongue cancer noticed the presence of foreign body in the malignant wound on the right side of his neck. He had undergone transarterial embolization on his right vertebral artery, right common carotid artery (CCA), and internal carotid artery (ICA) for carotid blowout syndrome 1 month prior. On physical examination, exposed spring-like metallic coils were observed, covered in brownish granulation tissue, at the bottom of the malignant wound. Neck radiograph and computed tomography confirmed the extrusion and migration of the embolic coils. Results: In this case, the patient was managed by transection of the exposed coils at the wound surface with close monitoring. Conclusions: Computed tomography angiography is essential for assessing the condition of the remaining embolic coils. In cases with thrombosed parent arteries, a conservative approach, like the transection of exposed coils, can be employed as part of the management strategy.

The Clinical Outcome of Carotid Blowout Syndrome Showing Non-bleeding Angiography.

OBJECTIVE: Patient with carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) may demonstrated non-bleeding digital subtraction angiography (DSA) without identifying pseudoaneurysm or contrast extravasation. Our objective is to evaluate the clinical outcomes for this specific subset of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted on 172 CBS patients who received DSA for evaluation of transarterial embolization (TAE) between 2005 and 2022, of whom 19 patients had non-bleeding DSA and did not undergo TAE. RESULTS: The age (55.2 ± 7.3 vs. 54.8 ± 11.1), male sex (17/19 vs. 135/153), tumor size (5.6 ± 2.4 vs. 5.2 ± 2.2), cancer locations were similar (P > 0.05) between both groups; except for there were more pseudoaneurysm/active bleeding (85.6% vs. 0%) and less vascular irregularity (14.4% vs. 94.7%) in the TAE group (P < 0.001). In the multivariable Cox regression model adjusting for age, sex, and tumor size, non-bleeding DSA group was independently associated with recurrent bleeding compared to TAE group (adjusted hazard ratio = 3.5, 95% confidence interval: 1.9-6.4, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the presence of vascular irregularity was associated with segmental recurrent bleeding (adjusted HR = 8.0, 95% CI 2.7-23.3, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patient showing non-bleeding DSA thus not having TAE had higher risk of recurrent bleeding, compared to patient who received TAE. Level of Evidence Level 4, Case Series.

Safety and efficacy of protective stent insertion to prevent carotid blowout syndrome at the distal internal carotid artery in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a comparison with endovascular occlusion.

Background: Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) frequently occurs at the distal internal carotid artery (distal-ICA) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and remedial treatments run a high risk for neurologic complications. A case-control study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of protective stent insertion at the distal-ICA to prevent CBS in NPC patients, with a comparison to endovascular coil occlusion. Methods: A total of 28 consecutive NPC patients at high risk of CBS from June 2019 to December 2021 in Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital (a tertiary institution) were retrospectively included and divided into a stent protection group and occlusion group. Technique feasibility, treatment outcomes and neurological deficiency were compared between the two groups by two-sample test. Kaplan-Meier analysis compared patients' survival rates at mid-term follow-up. Results: Stent insertion was performed in 15 patients and ICA occlusion in 13 patients. The technical success rate was 100% in both groups. Procedure-related ischemic stroke was identified in 2 patients (15.4%) in the occlusion group, compared with none in the stent protection group. Bleeding was encountered in one patient in the stent protection group and one patient in the occlusion group, each. During a median follow-up of 10.5 (range, 2-31) months, 3 patients (20%) showed asymptomatic in-stent occlusion in the stent protection group. Notably, the median survival time was significantly longer in the stent protection group than in the occlusion group (23.3 vs. 15.8 months, P=0.04). Conclusions: Protective stenting the distal-ICA was similarly effective in preventing CBS in NPC patients but was safer than endovascular occlusion of ICA.

Endovascular Management of Post-Irradiated Carotid Blowout Syndrome in Patients with Lower Neck Cancers.

OBJECTIVE: Lower neck cancers (LNCs) include specific tumour types and have some different vascular supply or collaterals from other head and neck cancers. This prospective study evaluated the outcome of endovascular management of post-irradiated carotid blowout syndrome (PCBS) in patients with LNC by comparing reconstructive management (RE) and deconstructive management (DE). METHODS: This was a single centre, prospective cohort study. Patients with LNC complicated by PCBS between 2015 and 2021 were enrolled for RE or DE. RE was performed by stent graft placement covering the pathological lesion and preventive external carotid artery (ECA) embolisation without balloon test occlusion (BTO). DE was performed after successful BTO by permanent coil or adhesive agent embolisation of the internal carotid artery (ICA) and ECA to common carotid artery, or ICA occlusion alone if the pathological lesion was ICA only. Cross occlusion included the proximal and distal ends of the pathological lesion in all patients. Re-bleeding events, haemostatic period, and neurological complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients (mean age 58.5 years; 56 male) were enrolled, including 28 patients undergoing RE and 31 patients undergoing DE. Three patients originally grouped to DE were transferred to RE owing to failed BTO. The results of RE vs. DE were as follows: rebleeding events, 13/28 (46%) vs. 10/31 (32%) (p = .27); haemostatic period, 9.4 ± 14.0 months vs. 14.2 ± 27.8 months (p = .59); neurological complication, 4/28 (14%) vs. 5/31 (16%) (p = .84); and survival time, 11.8 ± 14.6 months vs. 15.1 ± 27.5 months (p = .61). CONCLUSION: No difference in rebleeding risk or neurological complications was observed between the DE and RE groups. RE could be used as a potential routine treatment for PCBS in patients with LNC.

Brain abscesses following carotid blowout syndrome: a case report.

We report a case of intracranial abscesses development in a patient with head and neck cancer after emergent treatment of carotid blowout syndrome with coil embolization. Our patient is a 60-year-old male who presented with hemoptysis and hematemesis, which raised concerns for impending carotid blowout syndrome. Endovascular occlusion was successfully achieved, and the patient was discharged in stable condition. Ten days later, the patient reported headaches and right facial pain, and magnetic resonance imaging revealed multiple intracranial abscesses. Broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics were administered, leading to a variable response with some abscesses decreasing in size and others increasing. Seven weeks from discharge, the patient had no neurological deficits, and all abscesses had decreased in size.

Complication of head and neck cancer: Carotid blowout syndrome.

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is an uncommon but potentially life-threatening condition characterized by the spontaneous or traumatic rupture of the carotid artery in the neck. Oftentimes, CBS is due a loss of structural arterial integrity from local radiotherapy or surgical procedures. A vast majority of patients who develop CBS also have a previous diagnosis of head and neck cancer. Due to the specific patient population who develop CBS and its life-threatening nature, CBS should be a part of emergency physicians differential for those who present with a chronic neck wound or neurological symptoms in those with a previous head and neck cancer diagnosis. In this case report, a patient with a history of squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx who was treated with chemoradiation therapy, presented to the emergency department with spontaneous bleeding from an existing chronic wound on the left lateral neck. Conservative measures were taken including wound dressing, and the patient was discharged to see dermatology for biopsy of a suspected cancerous lesion. Once the chronic lesion was biopsied, the patient had to be immediately rushed to the operating room due to a brisk pulsatile bleeding from puncturing the carotid artery. Proper wound packing and an ultrasound of the neck for a proper diagnosis may have prevented the need for surgical intervention in this case. Although CBS is not common, complications can lead to death as seen in this case. Timely recognition and proper interventions are critical for preventing potentially fatal outcomes in those with CBS.

Outcomes Following Treatment for Carotid Blowout in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine outcomes after interventional radiology treatment of carotid blowout. METHODS: Patients with head and neck cancer and who received interventional radiology treatment for carotid blowout between 2000 and 2022 were included. Pre-treatment, treatment, and post-treatment variables were evaluated. RESULTS: Fourteen patients met inclusion criteria. Eleven patients (78.6%) had a history of radiation. Twelve (85.7%) blowouts occurred within 6 months of recent intervention. Initial treatment was with stenting (n = 9, 64.3%), coil embolization (n = 4, 28.6%), or both (n = 1, 7.1%). Six patients (42.9%) underwent subsequent carotid bypass. Morbidity following treatment included stroke (n = 1) and rebleeding (n = 4). Six-month survival was 57.1%. Of the patients who survived past six months, 5/8 were treated with carotid bypass and coverage. Four patients died of cancer progression, three of rebleeding, and three of medical complications. CONCLUSION: The majority of carotid blowout occurs within 6 months of surgery or radiation. Many who survive will die of cancer progression or medical illness. Carotid bypass with flap coverage may be a worthwhile treatment for carotid blowout and should be considered as an adjunct to endovascular treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:695-700, 2024.

Surgical treatment of carotid blowout syndrome after radiotherapy for head and neck malignant tumors: a single-center experience.

To explore the treatments for and manifestations of carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) and to further explore the critical role of high-flow bypass combined with parent artery isolation. The clinical data of nine patients with radiotherapy-related CBS who were admitted to our hospital from March 2020 to March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Relevant literature was reviewed. From March 2020 to March 2023, nine CBS patients were admitted to Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, including eight males and one female. Digital subtraction angiography was performed for all the patients; all the pseudoaneurysms were located at the petrous segment of the internal carotid artery. A balloon occlusion test was performed on four patients, which was tolerated by all patients. CT and MRI scans showed seven cases of osteonecrosis combined with infection and two cases of tumor recurrence. Emergency permanent parent artery occlusion was performed on six patients, aneurysm embolization was completed in one case, covered stent implantation was performed in one patient, and three cases were treated by cerebral bypass surgery (including two patients with failed interventional treatment). Rebleeding was found in two patients, and no rebleeding was found in the bypass group. Paralysis was found in three patients, and asymptomatic cerebral infarction without permanent neurologic impairment was found in three patients. Two patients died due to tumor progression. Emergency occlusion surgery is lifesaving in the acute phase of CBS. Endovascular therapy cannot prevent the progression of pseudoaneurysms or lower the recurrence rate of bleeding events. High-flow bypass combined with parent artery isolation is a safe and effective method that may facilitate further surgical treatment. Further research is warranted.

Survival analysis of a comprehensive treatment strategy for internal carotid artery blowout syndrome by nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyze the comprehensive treatment strategy for internal carotid artery blowout syndrome (CBS) by nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: Of the 311 patients of NPC with carotid artery blowout syndrome admitted at our center from April 2018 to August 2022, 288 were enrolled. RESULTS: The patients were divided into two groups: treatment group (266 cases) and control group (22 cases). After comprehensive treatment, the survival rate of the treatment group was significantly higher than that of the control group, especially within 6 months to the 1 year. Preventive intervention for CBS I type may have considerable benefits. And in the long run, this treatment strategy did not significantly increase the incidence of stroke in the treatment group. CONCLUSION: The comprehensive treatment strategy for ICA-CBS of patients with NPC significantly reduced the mortality of asphyxia due to epistaxis, reduced the incidence of CBS during nasal endoscopy, and finally improved survival rate.

Challenges in Managing Intractable Epistaxis in a Post-nasal Surgery and Radiated Cancer Patient: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Recurrent epistaxis represents an alarming sign that may suggest a sinister aetiology, especially in patients with previous head and neck malignancy. The recognition of certain potentially life-threatening conditions, namely pseudoaneurysm or tumour recurrence, remains prudence to avoid disastrous repercussion. Nasal endoscopy has become an essential tool in otolaryngology. It can aid identify the underlying cause of epistasis and facilitate therapeutic management. On the other hand, radio imaging is highly sensitive in detecting vascular lesions, besides providing a pre-operative mapping if surgical intervention is planned. This paper reported a patient with sphenoidal sinus squamous cell carcinoma in remission presented with torrential epistaxis not relieved with nasal packing. Despite a repeated angiogram and magnetic resonance image, the identification of the source of bleeding remained futile, culminating in an examination under general anaesthesia. The diagnosis of carotid blowout syndrome was made intraoperatively, and the bleeding was temporarily secured with a muscular patch, preceded by the insertion of a vascular stent. The authors wish to highlight the importance of examination under general anaesthesia if radio imaging does not correlate to the clinical findings. Management options for carotid blowout should be tailored to the patients' medical conditions. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-023-03625-4.