Evaluation of Direct Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing from Positive Flagged Blood Cultures in Sepsis Patients.

Background: Presently, many laboratories are equipped with automated system for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) for minimum inhibitory concentration-based reporting which enables the clinician to choose the right antimicrobial for timely treatment of sepsis. The study aimed to assess performance of direct AST from blood culture positive broth using automated AST system for accuracy and time taken to release the report. Materials and methods: The present study conducted in a 25-bedded ICU in North India for 12 months. Single morphotype of bacteria on gram stain from positively flagged blood culture bottles were included, which was directly identified (using an in-house protocol) with MALDI-TOF-MS from positive blood culture broths. DAST was carried out from 200 such blood culture broths and results were compared with reference AST (RAST) which was also done using VITEK-2 using overnight grown bacterial colonies as per standard protocol. Results: Among 60 isolates of Enterobacterales, 99% categorical agreement for both E. coli and K. pneumoniae observed by two methods were tested for AST. Among non-fermenters, Pseudomonas aeruginosa showed a categorical agreement of 99.6%, as compared with Acinetobacter spp. and exotic GNBs, which showed 95-96% agreement. A significant difference of 18-24 hours was noted in time to release the report between DAST and RAST, for GNB and GPC both. Conclusion: Direct AST from positive flagged blood culture bottles can significantly reduce the time to release the bacterial susceptibility report by up to 24 hours, at the same time maintaining the accuracy. How to cite this article: Singh V, Agarwal J, Nath SS, Sharma A. Evaluation of Direct Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing from Positive Flagged Blood Cultures in Sepsis Patients. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(4):387-392.

A Day Saved is a Life Saved: Direct Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing from Positively Flagged Blood Culture Bottles and their Concordance with the Routine Method.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a major health problem worldwide and is associated with high morbidity and mortality with every hour delay in initiation of therapy. A conventional method of blood culture and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST) takes around 48-72 hours. Empirical antibiotics need to be administered until the sensitivity report is made available. It has been estimated that 20-50% of the empirical antibiotics are inappropriate, resulting in prolonged hospital stays, adverse effects, and emergence of drug resistance. Additionally, this also puts an extra financial burden on both the patients and healthcare settings. Performing direct Antimicrobial Sensitivity Testing (dAST) is an important tool to reduce turn-around time (TAT) by at least 18-24 hours, thus reducing morbidity and mortality among critically ill patients. METHODS: Direct AST (dAST) was performed from the positively flagged blood culture bottles received between December, 2021 to May, 2022 from Intensive Care Units (ICUs) on MuellerHinton Agar (MHA) using four drops of withdrawn blood. dAST was performed for six drugs: Ceftriaxone-30 µg (CTR), Piperacillin/Tazobactam-100/10 µg (PIT), Meropenem-10 µg (MRP), Ciprofloxacin-5 µg (CIP), Aztreonam-30 µg (AT), and Colistin (CL). The zone of inhibition was interpreted as per CLSI M100 ed32, 2022 guidelines. A parallel conventional method was also performed to examine for categorical agreement and disagreement. Identification was carried out using MALDI-TOF MS from the colonies that appeared on the dAST plate on the subsequent day. RESULTS: A total of 162 positively flagged blood culture bottles were included in the study. The majority of the Gram-negative organisms were from Enterobacterales (n=109), followed by Acinetobacter spp. (n=28) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=25). Out of the 972 isolate-antimicrobial combinations, overall Categorical Agreement (CA) was seen in 936 (96.3%), whereas disagreement was observed in 36 with minor error (mE) in 21 (2.2%), major error (ME) in 7 (0.7%), and very major error (VME) in 8 (0.8%) when compared to the routine method. Categorical agreement (CA) of > 99% was seen in ceftriaxone (CTR) and ciprofloxacin (CIP). In comparison, the lowest CA was observed with meropenem (MRP) at 92%. Colistin dAST was performed using the E-strip method, and the result obtained was highly convincing, with an overall disagreement of only 1.2%. CONCLUSION: Rapid dAST from positively flagged blood culture bottles proved to significantly reduce the TAT from the time of sample collection to the first availability of antimicrobial susceptibility report with excellent categorical agreement of > 95% using the conventional disc diffusion method. Results obtained were within the acceptance criteria set by U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines of > 90% categorical agreement for a new method. We were able to obtain excellent concordance for colistin using the E-strip method. Performing dAST not only saves a "day", but its proper implementation would save a "life".

Evaluation of three protocols for direct susceptibility testing for Gram-negative rods from flagged positive blood culture bottles.

Bloodstream infections are associated with high mortality, which can be reduced by targeted antibiotic therapy in the early stages of infection. Direct antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) from flagged positive blood cultures may facilitate the administration of early effective antimicrobials much before the routine AST. This study aimed to evaluate three different direct AST protocols for Gram-negative rods from flagged positive blood culture broths. Blood culture broths showing Gram-negative rods only were subjected to direct AST by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute-recommended direct disk diffusion (protocol A). Additionally, automated AST (protocol B) and Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion (protocol C) were performed with standard inoculum prepared from bacterial pellets obtained by centrifuging blood culture broths in serum separator vials. For comparison, conventional AST of isolates from solid media subculture was also performed with Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion (reference standard) and the automated method. Overall, categorical agreements of protocols A, B, and C were 97.6%, 95.7%, and 95.9%, respectively. Among Enterobacterales, minor error, major error, and very major error rates of protocol B were 3.5%, 0.36%, and 0.43%, respectively, whereas minor error, major error, and very major error rates of protocol C were 3.4%, 0.72%, and 0.21%, respectively, and among non-fermenters, protocol B had a minor error rate of 6.5%, and protocol C had a minor error rate of 4.1% and major error rate of 1.9%. All three direct AST protocols demonstrated excellent categorical agreements with the reference method. Performance of protocols B and C between Enterobacterales and non-fermenters was not statistically different. IMPORTANCE: Bloodstream infections are associated with high mortality that can be reduced by targeted antibiotic therapy in the early stages of infection. Direct antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) from flagged positive blood cultures may facilitate the administration of early effective antimicrobials much before the routine AST. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute-recommended direct AST can be performed with a limited number of antibiotic disks only. On the other hand, using an automated system for direct AST will not only allow effective laboratory workflow with reduced turnaround time but also provide the minimum inhibitory concentration values of tested antibiotics. However, using expensive automated systems for direct AST may not be feasible for resource-limited laboratories. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the CLSI-recommended method and two other direct AST protocols (one with an automated system and the other with disk diffusion) for Gram-negative rods from flagged positive blood cultures.

Assessment of cefiderocol disk diffusion versus broth microdilution results when tested against Acinetobacter baumannii complex clinical isolates.

IMPORTANCE: Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii is a major global health concern due to its high prevalence and limited treatment options. Cefiderocol is the only novel Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved ß-lactam agent for the salvage treatment of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii infection. Currently, a commercial automated susceptibility testing panel of cefiderocol is unavailable. Both the preparation of iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth and the performance of broth microdilution are cumbersome in routine microbiology laboratories. A disk diffusion method is convenient for cefiderocol antimicrobial susceptibility testing, but limited data are available specifically for A. baumannii clinical isolates. Moreover, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute published revisions to the A. baumannii cefiderocol disk diffusion breakpoints in 2022. Hence, we evaluated the performance of cefiderocol disk diffusion compared with the reference BMD against A. baumannii clinical isolates, especially those with cefiderocol zone diameters ≤ 14 mm.

Evaluation of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Performance of DL 96 System for Enterobacterales.

DL96 Microbial Identification/Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (ID/AST) System (Zhuhai DL, Guangdong, China) is one of the most commonly used commercial ID/AST System in China. This study aims to evaluate the performance of DL 96E for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST) of 270 Enterobacterales isolates from Hainan general hospital using the broth microdilution method (BMD) as reference method. CLSI M52 criteria was followed when analyzing the evaluation results. Twenty antimicrobial agents were evaluated, and categorical agreement (CA) ranged from 62.8% to 96.5%. Imipenem had the lowest CA (63.9%) and highest very major errors (VME) (52.8%). A total of 103 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales were evaluated; DL 96E miss identified 22 isolates, including six carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. DL 96E must adjust the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) ranges of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and piperacillin-tazobactam to cover Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoints, adjust the formulation of some antimicrobial, such as imipenem, and increase the MIC detection range to cover the Quality control (QC) strains' MIC range.

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing-Recommended Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Staphylococcus aureus From Positive Blood Culture Bottles.

Background: Early diagnosis and treatment are important for a good prognosis of bloodstream infections. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) recommends rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) based on the disk diffusion methodology for 4, 6, and 8 hours of incubation. We evaluated EUCAST-RAST of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Staphylococcus aureus from positive blood culture bottles. Methods: Twenty strains of E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and S. aureus were tested using EUCAST-RAST. Ten antimicrobial agents against E. coli and K. pneumoniae and four agents against S. aureus were tested. The diameter of the inhibition zone (mm) was compared with the minimal inhibitory concentration (µg/mL) obtained using the Sensititre AST system (TREK Diagnostic Systems, East Grinstead, UK). Results: For E. coli, the percentage of total categorical agreement (CA) was 69.5% at 4 hours, and 87% at 8 hours. For K. pneumoniae, the total CA was 89% at 4 hours, and 95.5% at 6 hours. For S. aureus, the total CA was 100% after 4 hours. Discrepancies were observed mainly for E. coli with ß-lactam antimicrobial agents, and the numbers of errors decreased over time. Conclusions: EUCAST-RAST for K. pneumoniae and S. aureus met the United States Food and Drug Administration criteria at 6 and 4 hours, respectively, whereas that for E. coli did not meet the criteria for up to 8 hours. RAST can shorten the turn-around testing time by more than one day; therefore, if applied accurately according to laboratory conditions, antimicrobial agent results can be reported faster.

Evaluation of in-vitro colistin susceptibility and clinical profile of carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae related invasive infections.

PURPOSE: To determine the colistin susceptibility. To compare E-test vs broth-microdilution (BMD) method for invasive carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections. To study treatment options for the CRE. To analyze the clinical profile and outcome of CRE infections. METHODS: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed for 100 invasive CRE isolates. Gradient diffusion and BMD methods were performed to determine colistin MICs. Essential agreement (EA), categorical agreement (CA), very major error (VME), and major error (ME) were worked out between BMD method and E-test. The clinical profile of patients was analyzed. RESULTS: The majority of the patients suffered from bacteremia [47(47%)]. Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most common organism isolated overall as well as among bacteremic isolates. 9(9%) CRE isolates were colistin resistant by BMD of which six were Klebsiella pneumoniae. There was 97% CA between E-test and BMD. EA was 68%. VME was found in three out of nine colistin resistant isolates. No ME was found. Among the other antibiotics tested for CRE isolates, the highest susceptibility was seen to tigecycline [43(43%)] followed by amikacin [19 (19%)]. The most common underlying condition was post solid organ transplantation [36(36%)]. A higher survival rate was seen among non-bacteremic CRE infections (58.49%) than bacteremic CRE infections (42.6%). Four out of nine patients with colistin resistant CRE infections survived and had a satisfactory outcome. CONCLUSION: Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most common organism causing invasive infection. Survival rates were higher in non-bacteremic CRE infections than bacteremic infections. Good CA was seen between E-test and BMD for colistin susceptibility, but the EA was poor. VME was more common than ME when E-tests were used for colistin susceptibility testing resulting in false susceptibility. Tigecycline and aminoglycosides are possible adjunct drugs for the treatment of invasive CRE infections.

Comparative Performances of Vitek-2, Disk Diffusion, and Broth Microdilution for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Canine Staphylococcus pseudintermedius.

Staphylococcus pseudintermedius is the primary cause of canine cutaneous infections and is sporadically isolated as a pathogen from humans. Rapidly emerging antibiotic-resistant strains are creating serious health concerns so that accurate and timely antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is crucial for patient care. Here, the performances of the AST methods Vitek-2, disk diffusion (DD) and broth microdilution (BMD) were compared for the determination of susceptibility of 79 S. pseudintermedius isolates from canine cutaneous infections and one from human pyoderma to oxacillin (OXA), amoxicillin/clavulanate (AMC), cephalothin (CEF), gentamicin (GEN), enrofloxacin (ENR), doxycycline (DOX), clindamycin (CLI), inducible clindamycin resistance (ICR), mupirocin (MUP), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT). Overall, the agreement of DD and Vitek-2 using the veterinary AST-GP80 card with reference BMD was ≥90%, suggesting reliable AST performances. While DD generated mainly minor errors and one major error for OXA, Vitek-2 produced one very major error for GEN, and it failed in identifying one ICR-positive isolate. Moreover, five bacteria were diagnosed as ICR-positive by Vitek-2, but they showed a noninduction resistance phenotype with manual methods. All S. pseudintermedius isolates were interpreted as susceptible or intermediately susceptible to DOX using CLSI breakpoints for human staphylococci that match the DOX concentration range included in AST-GP80. However, this could lead to inappropriate antimicrobial prescription for S. pseudintermedius infections in companion animals. Considering the clinical and epidemiological importance of S. pseudintermedius, we encourage updating action by the system manufacturer to address AST for this bacterium.

Agreement between the categorization of isolates of Aeromonas salmonicida and Yersinia ruckeri by disc diffusion and MIC tests performed at 22℃.

Standard disc diffusion and MIC test procedure were used to investigate the susceptibility of two hundred and fifty-one isolates collected from infected fish in France to florfenicol, oxolinic acid and tetracycline. The tests were performed at 22 ± 2℃ and for the 177 Yersinia ruckeri they were read after 24-28 hr incubation and for the 74 Aeromonas salmonicida isolates they were read after 44-48 hr. Applying epidemiological cut-off values to the susceptibility data generated in these tests, the isolates were categorized as wild-type or non-wild-type. The agent-specific categories into each isolate were placed on the basis of the data generated by the two methods were in agreement in 98% of the determinations made. It is argued that, with respect to categorising isolates, disc diffusion and MIC methods can be considered as equally valid at this temperature and after both periods of incubation.

Performance of VITEK 2, E-test, Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion, and modified Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion compared to reference broth microdilution for testing tigecycline susceptibility of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and A. baumannii in a multicenter study in China.

Tigecycline is an alternative antibiotic for managing carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections. However, disk diffusion and automated testing often show false-intermediate or false-resistant results in tigecycline susceptibility, misleading clinical antimicrobial therapy. Broth microdilution (BMD) is the reference method for testing tigecycline susceptibility, but it is labor intensive and time consuming to perform in clinical laboratories. Therefore, a simple and accurate method is urgently needed. We evaluated the performance of VITEK 2, E-test, Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion (KB), and modified KB disk diffusion (mKB) versus BMD in testing tigecycline susceptibility of 372 strains of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) and 346 strains of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). BMD confirmed that 96.8% of CRKP and 91% of CRAB strains were susceptible to tigecycline. E-test, VITEK 2, KB, and mKB yielded categorical agreement of 96.7/59.3%, 69.9/54.3%, 78.5/87.3%, and 96.5%/91% for CRKP/CRAB, respectively. No very major error was found for either CRKP or CRAB by any method. No major error was found for CRKP or CRAB by the mKB method. The mKB method enhanced by R-buffer is simple, accurate, and inexpensive for clinical laboratories to test the susceptibility of CRKP and CRAB isolates to tigecycline.

In-house rapid colorimetric method for detection of ceftazidime/avibactam resistance in carbapenem resistant Enterobacterales.

A rapid colorimetric method, the Andrade screening antimicrobial test, was compared with the E-test method to detect ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) resistance in carbapenem resistant Enterobacterales clinical isolates. A 106 non-duplicated isolates (86 susceptible and 20 resistant to CZA) were chosen for validation. The sensitivity and specificity were 100%. This method investigates CZA resistance regardless of the resistance mechanism involved. It represents an economical and easy technique that can be applied to routine microbiology laboratories. It allows the detection of CZA resistance at 3 hours of incubation and consequently, the early implementation of accurate therapeutic interventions.

Evaluation of the Performance of Direct Susceptibility Test by VITEK-2 from Positively Flagged Blood Culture Broth for Gram-Negative Bacilli.

Background Timely initiation of antimicrobial therapy in patients with blood stream infection is absolutely necessary to reduce mortality and morbidity. Most clinical microbiology laboratories use conventional methods for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) that involve biochemical methods for identification followed by AST by disk diffusion. The aim of the current study is to assess the various errors associated with direct susceptibility testing done from blood culture broth using automated AST system-Vitek-2 compact compared with the reference method of AST done from bacterial colonies. Materials and Methods The study was conducted in a tertiary care public sector 2,200-bedded hospital in South India for a period of 6 months. The study involved positively flagged blood culture bottles that yielded single morphotype of Gram-negative organism by Gram stain. A total of 120 bacterial isolates were collected that consisted of consecutively obtained first 60 isolates of Enterobacteriaceae family (30 Escherichia coli and 30 Klebsiella pneumoniae ) and consecutively obtained first 60 nonfermenters (30 Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 30 Acinetobacter baumannii). Vitek-2 AST was done from these 120 blood culture broth, following the protocol by Biomerieux, and results were obtained. Then, Vitek-2 was done from colonies (reference method) using appropriate panel for Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermenters, and results were obtained. Both the results were compared. Results Nonfermenters showed a better categorical agreement of 97.6%, as compared to Enterobacteriaceae, which showed 97%. Among Enterobacteriaceae, both E. coli and K. pneumoniae showed categorical agreement of 97% each. Conclusion The procedure of AST directly from blood culture broth represents a simple and effective technique that can reduce the turnaround time by 24 hours, which in turn benefits the clinician in appropriate utilization of antimicrobials for better patient care.

Isothermal microcalorimetry minimal inhibitory concentration testing in extensively drug resistant Gram-negative bacilli: a multicentre study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of an isothermal microcalorimetry (IMC) method for determining the MICs among extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli. METHODS: A collection of 320 clinical isolates (n = 80 of each) of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii from Sweden, Spain, Italy and the Netherlands were tested. The MICs were determined using the IMC device calScreener (Symcel, Stockholm, Sweden) and ISO-broth microdilution as the reference method. Essential agreement, categorical agreement, very major errors (VME), major errors (ME) and minor (mE) errors for each antibiotic were determined. RESULTS: Data from 316 isolates were evaluated. Four errors (two ME, one VME, one mE) among 80 K. pneumoniae, six errors (four ME, one VME, one mE) among 79 E. coli, 15 errors (seven VME, three ME, five mE) among 77 P. aeruginosa and 18 errors (12 VME, two ME, four mE) among 80 A. baumannii were observed. Average essential agreement and categorical agreement of the IMC method were 96.6% (95% confidence interval, 94.2-99) and 97.1% (95% confidence interval, 95.4-98.5) respectively when the MICs were determined at the end of 18 hours. Categorical agreement of the IMC method for prediction of MIC by the end of 8 hours for colistin, meropenem, amikacin, ciprofloxacin and piperacillin/tazobactam were 95%, 91.4%, 94%, 95.2% and 93.7% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The IMC method could accurately determine the MICs among extensively drug-resistant clinical isolates of E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii isolates.

Comparative evaluation of plazomicin MICs obtained using agar dilution versus broth microdilution methods and impact of inoculum size against ESBL-producing Escherichia coli, carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates.

MICs of plazomicin were determined by agar dilution and broth microdilution in 187 ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (n = 73), carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 55) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (n = 59) clinical isolates. Inoculum effect was determined by broth microdilution assay using two different inocula; 1-5 × 105 (standard inoculum) and 1-5 × 108 CFU/mL. For all isolates tested >98% categorical agreement and ≥95% of essential agreement (±1elog2) was found. At high inocula, MICs of plazomicin increased ≥ eight-fold for 25% of E. coli, 24% of K. pneumoniae and 7% of S. aureus isolates tested. The results indicate that agar dilution and broth microdilution methods were equally suitable for determining plazomicin MICs. Inoculum effect was observed for plazomicin in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. Further studies that establish the genetic background of the isolates are required to better understand the reasons behind the inoculum effect.

In-house rapid colorimetric method for detection of colistin resistance in Enterobacterales: A significant impact on resistance rates.

A rapid colorimetric method, the Andrade Screening Antimicrobial Test (ASAT) was evaluated to detect colistin resistance in Enterobacteriales clinical isolates. The sensitivity and specificity were 90.7% and 100%, respectively. In 10/26 E. coli isolates the automatized method failed to detect the resistance, whereas the ASAT detected it accurately. Most of these isolates showed COL MIC values in the range 4-8 µg mL-1 and carried mcr-1. As regards K. pneumoniae COL- resistant isolates, discrepancies between the Phoenix system and the ASAT were observed only in 3/44 isolates, most of them carried the blaKPC gene and showed COL MIC values >16 µg mL-1.

Comparative Evaluation of Broth Microdilution with Polystyrene and Glass-Coated Plates, Agar Dilution, E-Test, Vitek, and Disk Diffusion for Susceptibility Testing of Colistin and Polymyxin B on Carbapenem-Resistant Clinical Isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii.

INTRODUCTION: With the increasing threat of multidrug-resistant organisms, such as Acinetobacter baumannii, the polymyxin class of drugs (colistin and polymyxin B) has become popular in clinical practice. A better understanding of antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for colistin and polymyxin B is needed for optimal patient management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-two carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates were subjected to susceptibility testing for colistin and polymyxin B using the following methods: broth microdilution (BMD) (glass-coated plates [BMD-Gs] and polystyrene plates [BMD-Ps]), agar dilution (AD), E-test®, Vitek®, and disk diffusion. Using BMD as the gold standard, comparative analysis between different methods was carried out. RESULTS: With BMD-Gs as reference, reliability was high for BMD-Ps and moderate for AD and Vitek for both the drugs. Similar results were obtained when the BMD-P was used as reference, but drug-polystyrene interaction was observed. CONCLUSION: Different susceptibility testing methods for polymyxins show great variation in their results and BMD using glass-coated plates can be considered the best candidate for gold standard.

Performance of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Etest, MIC Test Strips, and Disk Diffusion Compared to Reference Broth Microdilution for ß-Lactam-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates.

The performance characteristics of the ceftolozane-tazobactam (C-T) Etest (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France), MIC test strips (MTS; Liofilchem, Italy), and disk diffusion (Hardy, Santa Ana, CA) were evaluated for a collection of 308 beta-lactam-resistant isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa recovered from three institutions in Los Angeles, CA. Reference testing was performed by the reference broth microdilution (rBMD) method. MIC and disk results were interpreted using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints. Overall, 72.5% of the isolates were susceptible to C-T by rBMD. Etest and disk diffusion demonstrated acceptable performance, whereas MTS yielded a greater than acceptable percentage of minor errors. Categorical agreement was 96.8% for Etest, 87.0% for MTS, and 92.9% for disk diffusion. No very major errors were observed by any test, and no major errors (ME) were observed by Etest or disk diffusion. Two ME (0.9% of susceptible isolates) were observed by MTS. The incidence of minor errors was 3.2%, 12.3%, and 7.1% for Etest, MTS, and disk diffusion, respectively. Essential agreement (EA) for Etest was excellent, at 97.7%, whereas the MICs obtained by MTS tended to be 1 to 2 dilutions higher than those obtained by rBMD, with an EA of 87.0%.

Evaluation of the capabilities of disc diffusion and Vitek2-compact GN13 methods for testing antimi-crobial susceptibility and screening of ESBLs Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates / 中华微生物学和免疫学杂志

Objective To evaluate the capabilities of disc diffusion and Vitek2-compact GN13 methods for testing antimicrobial susceptibility of screening ESBLs ( extended-spectrumβ-lactamase) in En-terobacteriaceae clinical isolates.Methods A total of 93 Enterobacteriaceae strains were isolated from pa-tients with intra-abdominal infections in 21 hospitals during 2011 to 2012.The in vitro minimum inhibition concentration ( MIC ) values of ampicillin-sulbactam, piperacillin-tazobactam, ertapenem, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefepime, imipenem, amikacin, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin were determined by disc diffu-sion, Vitek2-compact GN13 and broth microdilution methods, respectively.Categorical agreement ( CA ) rates of disc diffusion and Vitek2-compact GN13 methods were determined by using broth microdilution meth-od as the reference method.The genes encoding ESBLs were screened in Escherichia coli (E.coli), Kleb-siella pneumoniae (K.pneumonia), Klebsiella oxytoca (K.oxytoca) and Proteus mirabilis (P.mirabilis) strains by using PCR analysis and gene sequencing.Disc diffusion and Vitek2-compact GN13 methods were used for the phenotypic confirmatory test of ESBLs and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the two tests were evaluated.Results The CA values of disc diffusion and Vitek2-compact GN13 methods for the 10 antibiotics were all >90% as compared with broth microdilution method.The major error (ME) rate for ertapenem was 3.2%and the very major error (VME) rates for am- picillin-sulbactam, ceftazidime and cefepime tests were all 2.2% by using Vitek2-compact GN13 method. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of disc diffusion and Vitek2-compact GN13 methods in the phenotypic confirmatory test of ESBLs were 96.7%(29/30), 100%(20/20), 100%(30/30) and 95%(19/20), respectively.Conclusion Both disc diffusion and Vitek2-compact GN13 methods could be used for testing the antimicrobial susceptibility and the detection of ESBLs in Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates with the advantage of accuarcy.Attention should be paid to the posibil-lity of oaurance of ME and VME when testing ertapenem, ampicillin-sulbactam, ceftazidime and cefepime by using Vitek2-compact GN13 method.

Method-specific performance of vancomycin MIC susceptibility tests in predicting mortality of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.

OBJECTIVES: Emerging evidence shows that methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections caused by isolates with higher vancomycin MICs within the susceptibility range are associated with adverse outcomes. No study, however, has examined different susceptibility tests in predicting treatment outcomes of MRSA infections. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 393 patients with MRSA bacteraemia. Vancomycin MICs for all MRSA isolates were determined simultaneously by agar dilution and the Etest, and using the MicroScan, VITEK-2 and Phoenix automated systems, and categorized into low- and high-MIC isolates at a breakpoint of ≥ 2 mg/L. The essential and categorical agreement between testing methods was compared. The method-specific ability to predict in-hospital mortality was examined by multivariate logistic regression analysis controlling for other potential confounders using clinical data from 310 vancomycin-treated MRSA bacteraemia patients. RESULTS: The agar dilution, Etest, MicroScan, VITEK-2 and Phoenix methods assessed 14.2% (56/393), 9.7% (38/393), 28.8% (113/393), 22.6% (89/393) and 3.1% (12/393) of MRSA isolates as having high (≥ 2 mg/L) vancomycin MICs. The essential and categorical agreement between testing methods ranged from 98.5% to 100% and from 73.8% to 91.9%, respectively. High vancomycin MICs for isolates determined using agar dilution and the Etest independently predicted mortality when controlling for confounding factors [adjusted OR, 2.321; 95% CI, 1.160-4.641; and adjusted OR, 3.121; 95% CI, 1.293-7.536, respectively]. High vancomycin MICs determined using all three automated systems failed to predict mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Vancomycin MICs generated by the agar dilution and Etest methods, but not the automated systems, independently predicted mortality among vancomycin-treated MRSA bacteraemia patients. Clinicians should incorporate this information with clinical assessment for decisions on appropriate anti-MRSA treatment.