Unresolved issues in the diagnosis of catheter related candidemia: A position paper / Cuestiones no resueltas en el diagnóstico de la candidemia relacionada con el catéter: un documento de opinión

The incidence and recent trends of candidemia and the contribution of the COVID-19 pandemic to its evolution are not well documented. The catheter is a major focus of Candida spp. infections, but the methods used to confirm the origin of candidemia are still based on the data generated for bacterial infection. The presence of Candida spp. on the tip of a removed catheter is the gold standard for confirmation but it is not always possible to remove it. Conservative methods, without catheter removal, have not been specifically studied for microorganisms whose times of growth are different from those of bacteria and therefore these results are not applicable to candidemia. The different Candida species do not have a particular tropism for catheter colonization and fungal biomarkers have not yet been able to contribute to the determination of the origin of candidemia. Techniques such Candida T2 Magnetic Resonance (T2MR) has not yet been applied for this purpose. Finally, there is not yet a consensus of how to proceed when Candida spp. is isolated from an extracted catheter and blood cultures obtained from simultaneous peripheral veins are negative. In this lack of firm data, a group of experts has formulated a series of questions trying to answer them based on the literature, indicating the current deficiencies and offering their own opinion. All authors agree with the conclusions of the manuscript and offer it as a position and discussion paper. (AU)

La incidencia y las tendencias recientes de la candidemia y la contribución de la pandemia de COVID-19 a su evolución no están bien documentadas. El catéter es uno de los principales focos de infecciones por Candida spp., pero los métodos empleados para confirmar el origen de la candidemia siguen basándose en los datos generados para la infección bacteriana. La presencia de Candida spp. en la punta de un catéter retirado es el método de referencia para la confirmación, pero no siempre es posible proceder a dicha retirada. Los métodos conservadores, sin retirada del catéter, no han sido estudiados específicamente para microorganismos cuyos tiempos de crecimiento son diferentes a los de las bacterias y, por tanto, estos resultados no son aplicables a la candidemia. Las diferentes especies de Candida spp. no tienen un tropismo particular para la colonización del catéter y los biomarcadores fúngicos, aún no han podido contribuir a la determinación del origen de la candidemia. Técnicas como la resonancia magnética T2MR todavía no se ha empleado para este fin. Por último, todavía no existe un consenso sobre cómo proceder cuando se aísla Candida spp. en un catéter extraído y los hemocultivos obtenidos por venas periféricas simultáneas son negativos. Ante esta falta de datos firmes, un grupo de expertos ha formulado una serie de preguntas y ha tratado de responderlas en base a la literatura, indicando las carencias presentes y ofreciendo su propia opinión. Todos los autores están de acuerdo con las conclusiones del manuscrito y lo ofrecen como documento de posición y discusión. (AU)

Early removal of a permanent catheter during the acute management of the unstable pediatric hemato-oncology patient with suspected catheter-related bloodstream infection: a multi-disciplinary survey and review of the literature.

There are no guidelines for the optimal manner and timing of permanent central catheter removal in the hemodynamically unstable pediatric hemato-oncology patient with suspected catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI). Our goals were to examine current practices of permanent central catheter management and choice of removal in the hemodynamically unstable pediatric patient with suspected CRBSI among practitioners in diverse subspecialties. We performed a literature review on the subject, and conducted a multi-disciplinary survey included pediatric oncologists, pediatric emergency medicine physicians, and pediatric intensive care physicians whom we queried about their choice of permanent central catheter management and removal while treating the hemodynamically unstable pediatric patient with suspected CRBSI. Most of the 78 responders (n = 47, 59%) preferred to utilize the existing permanent central catheter for initial intravenous access rather than an alternative access. There were no significant differences between physician subspecialties (p = 0.29) or training levels (p = 0.14). Significantly more pediatric emergency medicine physicians preferred not to remove the permanent central catheter at any time point compared to the pediatric hemato-oncologists, who preferred to remove it at some point during the acute presentation (44.4% vs. 9.4%, respectively, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Our study findings reflect the need for uniform guidelines on permanent central catheter use and indications for its removal in the hemodynamically unstable pediatric patient. We suggest that permanent central catheter removal should be urgently considered in a deteriorating patient who failed to be stabilized with medical treatment. WHAT IS KNOWN: • There are no guidelines for the optimal choice and timing of permanent central catheter removal in the hemodynamically unstable pediatric hemato-oncology patient with suspected catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI). WHAT IS NEW: • We found variations in practices among pediatricians from diverse subspecialties and conflicting data in the literature. • There is a need for prospective studies to provide uniform guidelines for optimal management of suspected CRBSI in the hemodynamically unstable pediatric patient.

Comamonas testosteroni bacteremia: A rare unusual pathogen detected in a burned patient: Case report and literature review.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Comamonas testosteroni is a rare human pathogen that is not part of the human microbiome. There are only 51 cases reported worldwide with 7 cases resulted in death. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of a 16-year-old boy with an extended burn complicated by catheter-related bloodstream C. testosteroni infection. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Comamonas species are usually community-acquired pathogens that are susceptible to a wide variety of antibiotics including aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, carbapenems, piperacillin-tazobactam, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and cephalosporins. However, in our case, we reported a nosocomial multidrug-resistant infection by C. testosteroni that responded only to colistin. CONCLUSION: Reporting unusual cases of nosocomial sepsis due to rare multidrug-resistant pathogens is detrimental. As it sheds light on how virulent nosocomial infections are becoming, and can be very alarming to other practitioners and clinical microbiologists, in order to achieve a better awareness of the importance of controlled antibiotics use.

S-Nitroso-N-acetyl-l-cysteine Ethyl Ester (SNACET) Catheter Lock Solution to Reduce Catheter-Associated Infections.

Antimicrobial-lock therapy is an economically viable strategy to prevent/reduce the catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) that are associated with central venous catheters (CVCs). Herein, we report the synthesis and characterization of the S-nitroso-N-acetyl-l-cysteine ethyl ester (SNACET), a nitric oxide (NO)-releasing molecule, and for the first time its application as a catheter lock solution to combat issues of bacterial infection associated with indwelling catheters. Nitric oxide is an endogenous gasotransmitter that exhibits a wide range of biological properties, including broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity. The storage stability of the SNACET and the NO release behavior of the prepared lock solution were analyzed. SNACET lock solutions with varying concentrations exhibited tuneable NO release at physiological levels for >18 h, as measured using chemiluminescence. The SNACET lock solutions were examined for their efficacy in reducing microbial adhesion after 18 h of exposure toStaphylococcus aureus (Gram-positive bacteria) andEscherichia coli (Gram-negative bacteria). SNACET lock solutions with 50 and 75 mM concentrations were found to reduce >99% (ca. 3-log) of the adhered S. aureus and E. coli adhesion to the catheter surface after 18 h. The SNACET lock solutions were evaluated in a more challenging in vitro model to evaluate the efficacy against an established microbial infection on catheter surfaces using the same bacteria strains. A >90% reduction in viable bacteria on the catheter surfaces was observed after instilling the 75 mM SNACET lock solution within the lumen of the infected catheter for only 2 h. These findings propound that SNACET lock solution is a promising biocidal agent and demonstrate the initiation of a new platform technology for NO-releasing lock solution therapy for the inhibition and treatment of catheter-related infections.

Removal and insertion of central venous catheters in cancer patients is associated with high symptom burden.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the symptom burden associated with CVC removal and insertion in cancer patients. METHODS: We collected patient-reported symptom-burden outcomes for 60 consecutive cancer patients: 30 undergoing CVC removal and 30 undergoing CVC insertion. Cancer patients self-administered the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory to rate the severity of 21 different symptoms immediately after the procedure Results: Symptoms were present in up to 57% to 67% of patients undergoing CVC insertion and removal respectively. Nineteen patients (32%) were moderately symptomatic with a symptom burden of four or more: ten insertion and nine removal patients. Symptoms with a score of 4 or more clustered around physical symptoms (pain, pressure or burning) or more generalized symptoms (fatigue, sleep, distress, dry mouth, and drowsiness). Nine (15%) patients rated at least one symptom as eight or more, five (17%) being insertion patients. CONCLUSIONS: CVCs are essential for the management of cancer patients. However, they can become infected and may need to be removed. Catheter removal and insertion produced moderate to severe symptom burden in cancer patients. Safe interventions that would salvage the vascular access without worsening the infectious outcome should be explored to alleviate morbidity associated with the symptom burden of removal and re-insertion.