Expectant management vs. cerclage in cases with prolapsed or visible membranes in the second trimester: is 24 weeks gestation threshold critical?

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of cervical cerclage with spontaneous follow-up strategy on pregnancy duration and neonatal outcomes in women with visible or prolapsed fetal membranes. METHODS: Patients who were referred to a single tertiary care centre between 1st January 2017 and 31st December 2022 were included in this comparative, retrospective cohort study. Patients were divided into two groups, those undergoing cerclage and those followed with no-cerclage. The range of pregnancy weeks for cerclage is between 18th and 27+6 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 106 cases were reviewed and nine were excluded. Based on shared decision making, cervical cerclage was performed in 76 patients (78.3 %) and 21 patients (21.6 %) were medically treated in no-cerclage group if there was no early rupture of the fetal membranes. The gestational age at delivery was 29.8 ± 6 [Median=30 (19-38)] weeks in the cerclage group and 25.8 ± 2.9 [Median=25 (19-32)] weeks in the no-cerclage group (p=0.004). Pregnancy prolongation was significantly longer in the cerclage group compared to the no-cerclage group (55 ± 48.6 days [Median=28 (3-138)] vs. 12 ± 17.9 days [Median=9 (1-52)]; p<0.001). Take home baby rate was 58/76 (76.3 %) in cerclage group vs. 8/21 (38 %) in no-cerclage group. In the post-24 week cerclage group the absolute risk reduction for pregnancy loss was 50 % (95 % CI=21.7-78.2). CONCLUSIONS: Cervical cerclage applied before and after 24 weeks (until 27+6 weeks) increased take home baby rate in women with visible or prolapsed fetal membranes without increasing adverse maternal outcome when compared with no-cerclage group.

Screening for women at risk of spontaneous preterm birth, including cervical incompetence.

Preterm births remain one of the biggest challenges in obstetrics worldwide. With the advancement of neonatal care, more premature neonates survive with long term consequences. Therefore, preventing or delaying preterm births starting from the preconceptional or antenatal periods are important. Among the numerous screening strategies described, not one can fit into all. Nonetheless, approaches including identifying women with modifiable risk factors for preterm births, genitourinary infections and short cervical length are the most useful. In this article, the current evidence is summarized and the best strategies for common clinical scenerios including cervical incompetence, history of second trimester loss or early preterm births, incidental short cervix and multiple pregnancy are discussed.

Rescue Cervical Cerclage After 24 Weeks and Subsequent Childbirth After 34 Weeks of Gestation.

A defect in the structure or function of the cervix that causes it to fail to contain the fetus intrauterine creates the condition called cervical insufficiency. Typical symptoms are pressure in the area of the pelvis, premature membrane rupture, and cervical dilation without uterine contractions. Surgical treatment includes the technique of cervical cerclage. It is usually performed from week 12 to week 16 of pregnancy. This article presents a case of rescue cervical cerclage after 24 weeks gestation and the observance of the pregnancy that followed. The cerclage was successful in prolonging the gestation of the fetus and no post-operative complications occurred due to the operation. The outcome of the pregnancy was a live and healthy baby born at 34 weeks gestation.

Association between polycystic ovarian syndrome and incompetent uterine cervix: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the association between polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) and cervical incompetence (CI). We hypothesise that insulin resistance induces a glucose metabolism disorder that could potentially cause cervical incompetence, resulting in an adverse outcome. DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies to summarise the evidence regarding the strength of the association of occurrence of CI in a PCOS pregnant woman compared to a non-PCOS pregnant woman. We defined PCOS as the presence of two of the three Rotterdam criteria, and a combination of clinical symptoms and ultrasound findings were used to diagnose CI. METHOD: This review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) reporting standards and the PROSPERO registration. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases to identify observational studies up to December 2022. We included studies in English which compared the PCOS and non-PCOS pregnant women who were diagnosed using Rotterdam criteria and subsequently developed CI in the same pregnancy. We excluded the studies which did not report CI as an outcome. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias (JBI critical appraisal tools). In the meta-analysis, effect estimates were pooled using the random effects model, and heterogeneity was measured using I2 statistics. RESULTS: We identified 23 articles, of which 19 were screened, and three studies were included in the meta-analysis. Three observational studies reported the data of 3845 pregnant women with PCOS and 9449 pregnant women without PCOS. One hundred and forty-one (3.7 %) pregnant women with PCOS developed CI compared to 58 (0.6 %) non-PCOS pregnant women [Risk ratio: 5.3; 95 % confidence interval: 1.9-14.6; I2: 89 %]. Of the three studies included, two had a low risk of bias, and one had a moderate risk of bias. CONCLUSION: The findings of the review suggested higher risk of CI in a pregnant woman with PCOS compared to pregnant women without PCOS. These findings highlight the necessity of establishing guidelines for early identification of CI in PCOS pregnant mothers to prevent adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes following preterm labour.

Risk factors for high-stage histological chorioamnionitis among pregnancies with cervical incompetence.

AIM: The study aimed to identify predictive risk factor to identify high-stage histological chorioamnionitis (HCA) in pregnancies with cervical incompetence (CIC). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted by including 116 pregnant women with cervical incompetence that required prophylactical and therapeutical cerclage. The histopathology examination on placenta was conducted with informed patient consent. All the cases included in this study were divided based on the severity degree of HCA. The demographic characteristic and the parameters related to maternal and fetal outcome were all analyzed. Besides, perioperative parameters of cerclage, including cervical length, cervical morphology, and laboratory indexes were also compared between two groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to determine the risk factor of severe chorioamnionitis. RESULTS: Severe HCA was significantly associated with cervical morphology, cerclage indication, cerclage type, and cervical length measured via ultrasound and vaginal examination. After adjusted for confounders, V-type funneling and short cervix was indicated as independent risk factors of severe HCA by multivariate logistic regression analysis, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: V-type funneling and short cervix may indicate the elevated risk of high-stage HCA. Due to the negative outcomes related with high-stage HCA, appropriate prenatal treatment would improve the pregnancy outcomes in cerclaged population. To facilitate postpartum treatment, placental histological examination should be routinely recommended to identify the high-stage HCA, especially in high risk pregnancies.

Effect of different surgical routes on pregnancy outcome of history-indicated cervical cerclage.

OBJECTIVE: To study the guiding significance of medical history on laparoscopic and vaginal cervical cerclage in the treatment of cervical incompetence and its influence on pregnancy outcome. METHODS: A total of 53 cases by laparoscopic abdominal cervical cerclage (LAC group) before pregnancy and 73 cases by transvaginal cervix cerclage (TVC group) at 12-14 weeks of pregnancy were collected. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed on the influencing factors of delivery gestational weeks. Furthermore, the gestational weeks after cervical cerclage were compared between the two groups with high- and low-risk grades. RESULTS: The number of previous uterine cavity operations in LAC group was more than that TVC group, and the costs of operation were more than TVC group. At the same time, the hospitalization days and operation time were longer than those in TVC group, and the delivery rate of cesarean section was higher than TVC group, but the total hospitalization times were less than TVC group (P < 0.05). The rate of delivery before 34 weeks of pregnancy and the incidence of premature rupture of membranes or premature labor in LAC group were lower than those in TVC group (P < 0.05). In TVC group, the increased number of prior PTB or STL and the history of cervical cerclage failure would increase the risk of premature delivery before 34 weeks of pregnancy. There was no increased risk of preterm delivery before 34 weeks of pregnancy in LAC group (P > 0.05). According to the risk level, in the high-risk group, the delivery rate of LAC group at gestational weeks < 37 weeks, < 34 weeks and < 28 weeks was lower than that of TVC group. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic cervical cerclage might be more effective in preventing premature delivery before 34 weeks of gestation, and its influence on delivery gestational weeks was not affected by related medical history. For high-risk patients with the history of prior PTB or STL and failed cerclage, laparoscopic cervical cerclage might be more effective than vaginal cervical cerclage in preventing extremely preterm before 28 weeks, premature delivery before 34 weeks and premature delivery before 37 weeks. Therefore, our limited experience suggested that LAC can be a recommended option for patients with high-risk history.

Favorable surgical and obstetrical outcomes in pre- and postconceptional laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: a large multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Cervical incompetence is an important cause of extremely preterm delivery. Without specialized treatment, cervical incompetence has a 30% chance of recurrence in a subsequent pregnancy. Recently, the first randomized controlled trial showed significant superiority of abdominal cerclage compared with both high and low vaginal cerclage in preventing preterm delivery at <32 weeks of gestation and fetal loss in patients with a previous failed vaginal cerclage. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess surgical and obstetrical outcomes in patients with pre- and postconceptional laparoscopic abdominal cerclage placement. Furthermore, it also aimed to perform subgroup analysis based on the indication for cerclage placement in order to identify patients who benefit the most from an abdominal cerclage. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective multicenter cohort study with consecutive inclusion of all eligible patients from 1997 onward in the Dutch cohort (104 patients) and from 2007 onward in the Boston cohort (169 patients) was conducted. Eligible patients had at least 1 second- or third-trimester fetal loss due to cervical incompetence and/or a short or absent cervix after cervical surgery. This includes loop electrosurgical excision procedure, conization, or trachelectomy. Patients were divided into the following subgroups based on the indication for cerclage placement: (1) previous failed vaginal cerclage, (2) previous cervical surgery, and (3) other indications. The third group consisted of patients with a history of multiple second- or early third-trimester fetal losses due to cervical incompetence (without a failed vaginal cerclage) and/or multiple dilation and curettage procedures. The primary outcome measure was delivery at ≥34 weeks of gestation with neonatal survival at hospital discharge. Secondary outcome measures included surgical and obstetrical outcomes, such as pregnancy rates after preconceptional surgery, obstetrical complications, and fetal survival rates. RESULTS: A total of 273 patients were included (250 in the preconceptional and 23 in the postconceptional cohort). Surgical outcomes of 273 patients were favorable, with 6 minor complications (2.2%). In the postconceptional cohort, 1 patient (0.4%) had hemorrhage of 650 mL, resulting in conversion to laparotomy. After preconceptional laparoscopic abdominal cerclage (n=250), the pregnancy rate was 74.1% (n=137) with a minimal follow-up of 12 months. Delivery at ³34 weeks of gestation occurred in 90.5% of all ongoing pregnancies. Four patients (3.3%) had a second-trimester fetal loss. The indication for cerclage in all 4 patients was a previous failed vaginal cerclage. The other subgroups showed fetal survival rates of 100% in ongoing pregnancies, with a total fetal survival rate of 96%. After postconceptional placement, 94.1% of all patients with an ongoing pregnancy delivered at ³34 weeks of gestation, with a total fetal survival rate of 100%. Thus, second-trimester fetal losses did not occur in this group. CONCLUSION: Pre- and postconceptional laparoscopic abdominal cerclage is a safe procedure with favorable obstetrical outcomes in patients with increased risk of cervical incompetence. All subgroups showed high fetal survival rates. Second-trimester fetal loss only occurred in the group of patients with a cerclage placed for the indication of previous failed vaginal cerclage, but was nevertheless rare even in this group.

Laparoscopic Cerclage in a Case of Unicornuate Uterus with Cervical Insufficiency and Previous Failed Mc Donald Cerclage with a Successful Outcome: A Case Report.

In this report, we describe a 28-year-old woman, with unicornuate uterus and multiple mid-trimester losses, with two failed Mc Donald's cerclage. She presented to us as a case of recurrent pregnancy losses with history suggestive of cervical incompetence and on detailed investigation was found to be ANA and anti-cardiolipin antibody positive and Rh negative. We performed an interval laparoscopic cervical cerclage for her and were able to successfully deliver her at 35 + 3 weeks with a healthy baby by caesarean section after previous five pregnancy losses and two failed Mc Donald's cerclage. Cervical cerclage can be used as an effective method of preventing abortions in unicornuate uterus pregnancy, while laparoscopic cerclage would be a better choice for patients with cervical incompetence with previous failed Mc Donald's cerclage. The possibility of uterine rupture for these high-risk patients should be kept in mind and decision to deliver at appropriate period of gestation so as to avoid uterine rupture and prematurity should be taken.

Short Cervix Following Initial Cerclage-Reinforcing Cerclage Versus Expectant Management.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether reinforcing cerclage following ultrasound evidence of cerclage failure before 24 weeks is an effective method to delay gestational age at delivery, and to decrease the rate of preterm and peri-viable delivery. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted for all patients who underwent any cervical cerclage procedure at a single tertiary care centre in Toronto, Canada between 1 December 2007 and 31 December 2017. RESULTS: Of 1482 cerclage procedures completed during the study period, 40 pregnant persons who underwent reinforcing cerclage were compared with 40 pregnant persons who were found to have cerclage failure before 24 weeks but were managed expectantly. After adjusting for the shortest cervical length measured prior to 24 weeks, there was no significant difference between the reinforcing cerclage and control group for gestational age at delivery, preterm, or peri-viable birth (P = 0.52, P = 0.54, P = 0.74, respectively). In an unadjusted model, there was a statistically significant increase in placental infection identified on postpartum placenta pathology in the reinforcing cerclage group compared with the expectant management group, 92.9% compared with 66.7% (P = 0.028). CONCLUSION: Reinforcing cerclage is unlikely to successfully delay the gestational age at delivery and reduce rates of preterm and pre-viable birth, especially if irreversible and progressive cervical change has begun. Future work should examine the role of preoperative amniocentesis to explore the impact of pre-existing intra-amniotic infection and reinforcing cerclage success.

Cerclage in complete placenta previa preventing preterm labor: A rare case report.

Placenta previa often leads to antepartum hemorrhage, which warrants the patient for emergency room admission. The bleeding occurs mainly due to cervical dilation, which could be caused by cervical incompetence. Cervical cerclage has been considered as the primary treatment for cervical incompetence. However, evidence is lacking for its application in placenta previa. Here, we present a case of a 30-year-old pregnant woman diagnosed with complete placenta previa where a good obstetrical outcome could be achieved. The patient had antepartum hemorrhage during the 21st week of gestational age due to cervical dilation in a complete placenta previa case. An emergency cerclage using McDonald's technique was then performed, which prolonged the pregnancy to the 34th week of gestation. The patient had cesarean section and delivered a healthy baby girl weighing 2190 g. The mother and the baby had an uneventful recovery and were discharged after 2 days of hospitalization.

Perinatal outcomes of twin emergency cerclage: comparison with expectant treatment and singleton emergency cerclage.

The present study aimed to evaluate the perinatal outcomes and influencing factors in twin pregnancies undergoing emergency cervical cerclage. The present retrospective cohort study included clinical data that were recorded between January 2015 and December 2021 at The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (China). The study included data from 103 pregnancies (26 twin and 77 singleton pregnancies) that underwent emergency cerclage and 17 twin pregnancies that underwent expectant treatment. The median gestational age of twin emergency cerclage was significantly lower than that of singleton emergency cerclage, but higher than that of expectant treatment (28.5, 34.0 and 24.0 weeks, respectively). The median interval to delivery of twin emergency cerclage was significantly lower than that of singleton emergency cerclage, but significantly higher than that of expectantly treated twin pregnancies (37.0, 78.0 and 7.0 days, respectively).IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? An important cause of premature birth is cervical insufficiency. Cervical cerclage extends the gestational period of women with cervical insufficiency. According to 2019 SOGC's No. 373-Cervical Insufficiency and Cervical Cerclage, both twin and single pregnancies benefit from emergency cerclage. However, there is minimal information about the pregnancy outcomes of emergency cerclage in twin pregnancies.What the results of this study add? This study shows that the outcomes of pregnancy in twin pregnancies undergoing emergency cerclage were better than that of expectant treatment but worse than that in singleton pregnancies undergoing emergency cerclage.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? In this study, pregnant women with cervical insufficiency in twin pregnancies can benefit from emergency cerclage, we should treat those pregnant women as early as possible.

Impact of a previous late miscarriage on subsequent pregnancy outcomes: A retrospective cohort study over 10 years.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the prognostic impact of a previous late miscarriage (LM) on the subsequent pregnancy outcomes of women with infertility. METHOD: This retrospective cohort study included couples who had experienced LM following their first embryo transfer during an in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle from January 2008 to December 2020. Subgroup analysis and binary logistic regression were performed to evaluate the associations between LM due to different causes and subsequent pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 1072 women who had experienced LM were included in this study, comprising 458, 146, 412, and 56 women with LM due to unexplained factors (unLM), fetal factors (feLM), cervical factors (ceLM; i.e. cervical incompetence), and trauma factors (trLM), respectively. Compared with the general IVF (gIVF) population, the early miscarriage rate was significantly higher in the unLM group (8.28% vs. 13.47%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.60, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.12-2.28; P = 0.01). Furthermore, women in the unLM and ceLM groups had a dramatically increased risk of recurrent LM (unLM: 4.24% vs. 9.43%, aOR 1.91, 95% CI 1.24-2.94; P = 0.003; ceLM: 4.24% vs.15.53%, aOR 2.68, 95% CI 1.82-3.95; P < 0.001) and consequently a reduced frequency of live birth (unLM: 49.96% vs. 43.01%, aOR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61-0.91; P = 0.004; ceLM: 49.96% vs. 38.59%, aOR 0.61, 95% CI 0.49-0.77; P < 0.001) compared with the gIVF population. CONCLUSION: A previous LM due to an unexplained factor or cervical incompetence was significantly associated with a higher risk of miscarriage and a lower live birth rate after subsequent embryo transfer.

Abnormal Vaginal Flora in Cervical Incompetence Patients - the Impact of Escherichia coli.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of abnormal vaginal colonization in women with cervical incompetence and to analyze its impact on obstetric and neonatal outcomes and placental inflammation. We included 138 pregnant women diagnosed with cervical incompetence and delivered in our hospital. Patients with major fetal anomaly or multifetal pregnancy were excluded. Upper vaginal culture was performed on the day of admission. A total of 60.9% (84/138) of cervical incompetence patients had abnormal bacterial colonization, and Escherichia coli (E. coli) was the most common colonized pathogen (33.3%, 46/138). The positive vaginal E. coli group had a higher rate of prior preterm birth (p = 0.021) and an earlier gestational age at which cervical incompetence was diagnosed (p < 0.01) than the negative group. The positive vaginal E. coli group had higher rates of clinical chorioamnionitis (p = 0.008) and subchorionic microabscess of the placenta (p = 0.012). Importantly, the positive vaginal E. coli group had significantly higher rates of proven early-onset neonatal sepsis (EONS) (p = 0.046), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) (p = 0.001), and neonatal mortality (p = 0.023). After adjusting for confounding variables, the positive vaginal E. coli group had significantly higher risk for proven EONS (OR: 3.853, 95% CI: 1.056-14.055) and NEC (OR: 12.410, 95% CI: 1.290-119.351). In conclusion, E. coli was the most common vaginal microorganism isolated from patients with cervical incompetence. Maternal vaginal E. coli colonization was associated with adverse neonatal outcomes including proven EONS and NEC and was characterized by a higher rate of placental subchorionic microabscess.

Effects of emergency/nonemergency cervical cerclage on the vaginal microbiome of pregnant women with cervical incompetence.

Background: Evaluation of the therapeutic effects of cerclage on preterm birth (PTB) caused by cervical incompetence remains challenging. The vaginal microbiome is associated with preterm births. Thus, this study aimed to analyse the vaginal microbiota of patients with cervical incompetence, explore the relationship between the composition of the vaginal microbiota before cervical cerclage and at term delivery, and assess the effect of cervical cerclage on the vaginal microbiota. Methods: Patients (n = 30) underwent cerclage performed by the same surgical team. Vaginal swabs were obtained pre-surgery and seven days post-surgery. A gestational age-matched cohort of healthy pregnant women (n = 20) (no particular abnormality during pregnancy, delivery at term) was used as the control group and sampled during a comparable pregnancy. All collected vaginal swabs were analysed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Results: When comparing the healthy control and cervical cerclage groups, the enriched microorganism in the healthy controls was G. Scardovia, and the enriched microorganism of the cerclage was G. Streptococcus. α diversity was significantly increased in patients who received cerclage with preterm delivery compared with those with full-term delivery, and the enriched microorganism was F. Enterococcus. A comparison before and after nonemergency cerclage suggested that the enriched microorganisms were G. Lactobacillus and F. Lactobacillaceae before surgery. After nonemergency cerclage, the enriched microorganisms were F. Enterobacteriaceae and C. Gammaproteobacteria. Vaginal microbiota diversity significantly increased, and the proportion of women with Lactobacillus spp.-depleted microbiomes increased after emergency cerclage. Significant differences in ß diversity were found between the groups. Before the emergency cerclage, the enriched microorganisms were G. Lactobacillus, O. Alteromonadales, and P. Firmicutes. After emergency cerclage, the enriched microorganisms were P. Actinobacteria, C. Actinobacteria, P. Proteobacteria, F. Bifidobacteriaceae, O. Bifidobacteriales, G. Gardnerella, and G. Veillonella. Conclusion: Cerclage (particularly emergency cerclage) may alter the vaginal microbiota by increasing microbiota diversity, decreasing vaginal Lactobacillus abundance, and increasing the abundance of pathogenic bacteria that are not conducive to pregnancy maintenance, thereby affecting surgical efficacy. Therefore, the role of the vaginal microbiome should be considered when developing treatment strategies for pregnant women with cervical incompetence. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2100046305.

Prior Spontaneous or Induced Abortion Is a Risk Factor for Cervical Dysfunction in Pregnant Women: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

A history of abortion is associated with cervical dysfunction during pregnancy, but there remains uncertainty about whether risk can be stratified by the abortion type, the abortion procedure, or number of previous abortions. The objective of this study was to verify the relationship between cervical dysfunction measures in pregnancies with and without a history of termination. Embase and Medline databases were searched from 01 January 1960 to 01 March 2022 resulting in a full-text review of 28 studies. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality and risk of bias for non-randomized studies. The meta-analysis consisted of 6 studies that met all inclusion and exclusion criteria and included a combined total of 2,513,044 pregnancies. Cervical dysfunction was defined as either cervical insufficiency/incompetence in 4 of the studies and as short cervix in the others. Results from a random-effects model using reported adjusted odds ratios (aOR) estimated an increase in the odds of 2.71 (95% CI 1.76, 4.16) for cervical dysfunction in the current pregnancy related to a history of induced or spontaneous abortion. Subgroup analyses with only induced abortions (surgical/medical) estimated an aOR of 2.54 (95% CI 1.41, 4.57), while studies limited to surgical abortions had an aOR of 4.08 (95% CI 2.84, 5.86). The risk of cervical dysfunction in the current pregnancy was also found to be dependent on the number of previous abortions. In this meta-analysis, a prior history of abortion, and specifically induced abortions, was associated with cervical dysfunction. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020209723).

Uterine contraction may not be an independent risk factor for spontaneous preterm birth before 35 weeks in women with cervical shortening.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB) before 35 weeks in symptomatic and asymptomatic women with cervical shortening at 16-34 weeks under mid-trimester universal screening of cervical length (CL). METHOD: Multicenter retrospective cohort study involving six secondary/tertiary perinatal centers was planned in 2016. Primary outcomes were SPTB before 35 weeks. In all, 407 women were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression analysis for predicting SPTB before 35 weeks while adjusting for presence/absence of uterine contraction, gestational weeks, vaginal bleeding, and CL classification (1-9, 10-14, 15-19, and 20-24 mm) at admission, the execution of cervical cerclage, and the presence/absence of past history of preterm delivery. RESULTS: SPTB before 35 weeks of pregnancy occurred in 14.5%. Presence of uterine contraction was not an independent risk factor for SPTB before 35 weeks (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-2.20). CL of 1-9 mm, CL of 10-14 mm, and vaginal bleeding at admission were independent risk factors for SPTB before 35 weeks (aOR 5.35, 95% CI 2.11-13.6; aOR 2.79, 95% CI 1.12-6.98; and aOR 2.37, 95% CI 1.12-5.10, respectively). CONCLUSION: In women with a cervical shortening at 16-34 weeks, presence of uterine contractions at admission may not be an independent risk factor for the occurrence of SPTB before 35 weeks.

Clinical presentation, investigation, underlying causes, and subsequent pregnancy outcomes among different phenotypes of second trimester miscarriage.

AIM: To evaluate the causes of miscarriage and subsequent pregnancy outcomes among different phenotypes of second trimester miscarriage. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 170 consecutive second trimester miscarriages between 14 + 0 and 23 + 6 weeks recorded in the Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System from 2012 to 2021. Cases were excluded if miscarriages occurred before 14 + 0 weeks of gestation, data were incomplete, or passage of the fetus happened before the clinical assessment. Cases were classified with a stepwise approach into three phenotypic groups including silent miscarriages (ST-SM), rupture of membranes (ST-ROM), and inevitable miscarriages (ST-IM) depending on the fetal heart pulsation and leakage of liquor at presentation. Clinical investigation of the underlying causes and the outcome of the subsequent pregnancy was then reviewed. RESULTS: There were 97 cases of ST-SM, 21 cases of ST-ROM, and 52 cases of ST-IM. Placental histology and karyotype examination were more likely to yield significant results in the cases of ST-ROM and ST-SM (p < 0.05). The phenotypic examination identified different underlying causes including fetal anomaly, suspected cervical insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, and unknown causes (p < 0.001). Sixty-four cases achieved a subsequent pregnancy. Although women with history of ST-ROM and ST-IM received more cervical length monitoring and cervical cerclage than those with ST-SM (66.7% vs. 44.4% vs. 7.5%, p = 0.0002; and 16.7% vs. 22.2% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.031, respectively), the risk of recurrent second trimester miscarriage was higher in ST-ROM and ST-IM than in ST-SM (16.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: The classification can differentiate different second trimester miscarriage phenotypes, which offers essential information to guide investigation panels of the underlying cause of miscarriages, and the prognosis and management of subsequent pregnancy. Future researches focused on second trimester miscarriage should report their findings according to different phenotypes.

Comparison of maternal-fetal outcomes between laparoscopic cervicoisthmic cerclage and McDonald cerclage in women with cervical insufficiency / 中华妇产科杂志

Objective:To compare the maternal and fetal outcomes of women with cervical insufficiency (CI) undergoing McDonald cerclage (MC) and laparoscopic cervicoisthmic cerclage (LCC), so as to provide evidence for the selection of cerclage methods.Methods:A retrospective trial was carried out in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2010 to December 2020. A total of 221 women who underwent the prophylactic cerclage were divided into MC group ( n=54), LCC with MC history group ( n=28) and LCC without MC history group ( n=129) by the mode of operation and whether the pregnant women who underwent LCC had MC history. General clinical data, pregnancy complications and pregnancy outcomes were compared between the three groups. Results:(1) General clinical data: the proportion of women accepted cervical cerclage during pregnancy in MC group, LCC with MC history group and LCC without MC history group were 100.0% (54/54), 7.1% (2/28) and 27.1% (35/129), respectively ( P<0.001). The indications of the three groups showed statistical significance ( P=0.003), and the main indication was the history of abortion in the second and third trimester [75.9% (41/54) vs 89.3% (25/28) vs 84.5% (109/129)]. (2) Pregnancy complications: the incidence of abnormal fetal position [7.8% (4/51) vs 17.4% (4/23) vs 19.8% (24/121)], placenta accrete [5.9% (3/51) vs 13.0% (3/23) vs 11.6% (14/121)], uterine rupture [0 vs 4.3% (1/23) vs 5.8% (7/121)] in the MC group were all lower than those in LCC with MC history and LCC without MC history groups. However, there were no statistical significances (all P>0.05). Intrauterine inflammation or chorioamnionitis [15.7% (8/51) vs 0 vs 0.8% (1/121)] and premature rupture of membrane [23.5% (12/51) vs 4.3% (1/23) vs 0] were both significantly higher in MC group than those in LCC with MC history and LCC without MC history groups (all P<0.001). (3) Pregnancy outcomes: the cesarean section rate was significantly lower in MC group (41.2%, 21/51) than that in LCC with MC history group (100.0%, 23/23) and LCC without MC history group (100.0%, 121/121; P<0.001). MC group was associated with lower expenditure than LCC with MC history and LCC without MC history groups (12 169 vs 26 438 vs 27 783 yuan, P<0.001). The success rates of live birth cerclage did not differ significantly in MC (94.4%, 51/54), LCC with MC history (82.1%, 23/28) and LCC without MC history (93.8%, 121/129) groups ( χ2=5.649, P=0.059). There was no significant difference in neonatal intensive care unit occupancy, neonatal birth weight and neonatal asphyxia between the three groups (all P>0.05). Conclusions:Both LCC and MC are the treatment choice for women with CI, which may get similar liver birth. However, MC has the advantages of low cesarean section rate, economical and easy operation. Therefore, MC is recommended as the first choice for CI patients, and LCC is for women with failed MC.

Hourglassing of Prolapsed Membranes With Fetal Parts Within 22 Weeks Primigravida: A Rare Presentation.

Three clinical scenarios, premature labor; inescapable abortion; and incompetent cervix, result in the dilatation of endocervical canals before term. Ultrasonography is the modality of choice for confirming the above conditions. Here, we discuss a case of preterm primigravida with complaints of bleeding per vagina with the dilated cervix and prolapsed membranes with fetal parts within.