Protocolo de recuperación mejorada después de cirugía (ERAS) atenúa el estrés y acelera la recuperación en pacientes después de resección radical por cáncer colorrectal: Experiencia en la Clínica Universitaria Colombia / Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol attenuates stress and accelerates recovery in patients after radical resection for colorectal cancer: Experience at Clínica Universitaria Colombia

Introducción. El conjunto de estrategias de recuperación mejorada después de la cirugía (ERAS, por sus siglas en inglés) constituye un enfoque de atención multimodal y multidisciplinario, cuyo propósito es reducir el estrés perioperatorio de la cirugía, disminuir la morbilidad y acortar la estancia hospitalaria. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo describir los resultados clínicos de pacientes sometidos a cirugía por cáncer colorrectal, identificando las complicaciones principales y los factores perioperatorios relacionados con el alta temprana. Métodos. Se analizaron los pacientes consecutivos sometidos a cirugía colorrectal entre los años 2020 y 2023, todos los cuales siguieron el protocolo ERAS institucional. Se evaluaron las características clínicas, los factores perioperatorios, los desenlaces postoperatorios y la tasa global de adherencia al protocolo. Resultados. Un total de 456 pacientes fueron sometidos a cirugía colorrectal, 51% de sexo masculino, con edad media de 60 años. La mayoría de las intervenciones se realizaron por laparoscopia (78 %), con una tasa de conversión del 14,5 %. Las complicaciones postoperatorias incluyeron fuga anastomótica (4,6 %), sangrado, infección intraabdominal y obstrucción intestinal. La estancia hospitalaria promedio fue de 4 días y la mortalidad del 2,8 %. La tasa global de adherencia al protocolo ERAS fue del 84,7 %. Conclusiones. El enfoque combinado de cirugía laparoscópica y protocolo ERAS es factible, seguro y se asocia con una estancia hospitalaria más corta. La implementación y adherencia al protocolo ERAS no solo mejora los resultados postoperatorios, sino que también resalta la importancia de acceder a datos sólidos, permitiendo mejorar la atención perioperatoria local.

Introduction. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol is a multimodal, multidisciplinary approach to care, the purpose of which is to reduce the perioperative stress of surgery, decrease morbidity, and shorten hospital stay. This study aimed to describe the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer, identifying the main complications and perioperative factors related to early discharge. Methods. Consecutive patients undergoing colorectal surgery between 2020 and 2023 were analyzed, who followed the institutional ERAS protocol. Clinical characteristics, perioperative factors, postoperative outcomes, and overall protocol adherence rate were evaluated. Results. A total of 456 patients underwent colorectal surgery, 51% male, with a mean age of 60 years. Most interventions were performed laparoscopically (78%), with a conversion rate of 14.5%. Postoperative complications included anastomotic leak (4.6%), followed by bleeding, intra-abdominal infection, and intestinal obstruction. The average hospital stay was 4 days and mortality was 2.8%. The overall adherence rate to the ERAS protocol was 84.7%. Conclusions. The combined approach of laparoscopic surgery and ERAS protocol is feasible, safe, and associated with a shorter hospital stay. Implementation and adherence to the ERAS protocol not only improves postoperative outcomes, but also highlights the importance of accessing solid data, allowing for improved local perioperative care.

The use of mixed reality in the preoperative planning of colorectal surgery: Preliminary experience with a narrative review.

New advanced technologies have recently been developed and preliminarily applied to surgery, including virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR) and mixed reality (MR). We retrospectively review all colorectal cases in which we used holographic 3D reconstruction from February 2020 to December 2022. This innovative approach was used to identify vascular anomalies, pinpoint tumor locations, evaluate infiltration into neighboring organs and devise surgical plans for both training and educating trainee assistants. We have also provided a state-of-the-art analysis, briefly highlighting what has been stated by the scientific literature to date. VR facilitates training and anatomical assessments, while AR enhances training and laparoscopic performance evaluations. MR, powered by HoloLens, enriches anatomic recognition, navigation, and visualization. Successful implementation was observed in 10 colorectal cancer cases, showcasing the effectiveness of MR in improving preoperative planning and its intraoperative application. This technology holds significant promise for advancing colorectal surgery by elevating safety and reliability standards.

Biological therapy, surgery, and hospitalization rates for inflammatory bowel disease: An observational Latin American comparative study between adults and pediatric patients.

OBJECTIVE: Compare the proportions of use of biological therapy, surgeries, and hospitalizations between adults and pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC)-patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Observational, retrospective, and multicenter study. Data were collected from all consecutive IBD patients seen as outpatients or admitted to hospital, during 2015-2021, in two IBD tertiary centers in a South Brazilian capital. Patients with unclassified colitis diagnosis were excluded from this study. Patients were classified as having CD or UC and sub-categorized as adult or pediatric according to age. Data were analyzed using frequency, proportion, Fisher's exact test, and Chi-square test. RESULTS: A total of 829 patients were included: 509 with CD (378 adults/131 pediatric) and 320 with UC (225/95). Among patients with CD, no differences were observed for proportions of use of biological therapy (80.2% in pediatric vs. 73.3% in adults; P=0.129), surgery (46.6% vs. 50.8%; P=0.419), or hospitalization (64.9% vs. 56.9%; P=0.122). In UC, significant differences were observed for biological therapy (40.0% vs. 28.0%; P=0.048) and hospitalization (47.4% vs. 24.0%; P<0.001). No significant difference was observed in surgery rates (17.9% vs. 12.4%; P=0.219). CONCLUSIONS: Biological therapy and incidence of hospitalization were greater among pediatric patients with UC, compared with adults; no difference was observed in the need for abdominal surgery. In CD, no significant difference was observed in the three main outcomes between the age groups.

Evaluación angiográfica de la distribución anatómica de la irrigación sanguínea del ángulo esplénico del colon en población chilena

Objetivo: Identificar los patrones de distribución vascular del ángulo esplénico del colon (AEC) en la población chilena para su comparación con la literatura oriental (Fukuoka). Materiales y Métodos: Estudio descriptivo, transversal. Se caracterizó la irrigación del AEC de imágenes con protocolo Urotac realizadas en Clínica INDISA entre el año 2020 y 2021 (n = 127), clasificándolas dentro de 6 tipos descritos por Fukuoka. Se evaluaron características demográficas y comorbilidades. Las variables fueron analizadas utilizando estadística descriptiva y la significancia mediante la prueba Chi2. Resultados: Existen diferencias en los tipos irrigación del AEC entre la serie local y Fukuoka, la irrigación tipo 3 fue la que presentó mayor variación (p < 0,05). El tipo 1 es la más frecuente (34,7%), sin casos del Tipo 4. No se identificó diferencia entre los distintos tipos de irrigación con relación a las variables demográficas y comorbilidades. Discusión: Al comparar nuestra serie con la oriental se evidenció similar frecuencia en tipos 1 y 6, mayor en tipos 3 y 5, y tipos 2 y 4 con menor representación. Se identificó un mayor aporte en la irrigación del AEC por la arteria cólica izquierda (ACI) en la población estudiada (64,6%). Conclusión: Nuestra población tiene mayor participación de ACI en irrigación del AEC que orientales (64,6% vs 49,6%), los tipos más frecuentes son 1, 3 y 6, el Tipo 1 es la forma más frecuente de irrigación, similar a Fukuoka (34,7% vs 39,7%), Tipo 3 tiene mayor representación en nuestra población que en la oriental (29,9% vs 9,9%).

Objective: To identify the vascular distribution patterns of the splenic flexure of the colon (AEC) in the Chilean population for comparison with the oriental literature (Fukuoka). Methods: Descriptive, cross-sectional study. The irrigation of the AEC of images with the Urotac protocol performed at the INDISA Clinic between 2020 and 2021 (n = 127) was characterized, classifying them into 6 types described by Fukuoka. Demographic characteristics and comorbidities were evaluated. Variables were analyzed using descriptive statistics and significance using the Chi2 test. Results: There are differences in the types of irrigation of the AEC between the local series and Fukuoka, irrigation type 3 was the one that presented the greatest variation (p < 0.05). Type 1 is the most frequent (34.7%), with no cases of Type 4. No difference was identified between the different types of irrigation in relation to demographic variables and comorbidities. Discussion: When comparing our series with the eastern one, a similar frequency was found in types 1 and 6, higher in types 3 and 5, and types 2 and 4 with less representation. A greater contribution was identified in the irrigation of the AEC by the left colic artery (ICA) in the population studied (64.6%). Conclusion: Our population has a greater participation of ICA in AEC irrigation than Orientals (64.6% vs 49.6%), the most frequent types are 1, 3 and 6, Type 1 is the most frequent form of irrigation, similar to Fukuoka (34.7% vs 39.7%), Type 3 is more represented in our population than in the eastern one (29.9% vs 9.9%).

Manejo Clínico ­ Quirúrgico de pacientes con Fisura Anal en la Unidad de Coloproctología del HECAM / Clinical-Surgical Management of patients with Anal Fissure in the Unit HECAM Coloproctology

La fisura anal es una de las enfermedades más antiguamente descritas, la misma que, ha tenido hasta el momento múltiples tratamientos tanto médicos como quirúrgicos, existiendo controversias en su algoritmo terapéutico. Constituye una de las patologías cuyo diagnóstico y tratamiento corresponde a la Especialidad de Coloproctología, afecta a ambos sexos y a cualquier edad y puede ser aguda o crónica. Proponemos el presente Protocolo para un adecuado manejo de la patología, de manera que sirva de guía en la toma correcta de decisiones basadas en la evidencia y el consenso de quienes integramos la Unidad Técnica de Coloproctología del Hospital de Especialidades Carlos Andrade Marín.

Anal fissure is one of the oldest described diseases, which has so far had multiple medical and surgical treatments, with controversies in its therapeutic algorithm. It is one of the pathologies whose diagnosis and treatment corresponds to the Coloproctology Specialty, it affects both sexes and any age and can be acute or chronic. We propose the present Protocol for an adequate management of the pathology, so that it serves as a guide in the correct decision making based on evidence and consensus of those who integrate the Technical Unit of Coloproctology of the Hospital de Especialidades Carlos Andrade Marín.

Aplicación de reconstrucción 3D e inteligencia artificial a la escisión completa de mesocolon y linfadenectomía D3 en el cáncer de colon / Application of 3D-reconstruction and artificial intelligence for complete mesocolic excision and D3 lymphadenectomy in colon cancer

Las técnicas de reconstrucción 3D basadas en algoritmos matemáticos y la inteligencia artificial son una línea de innovación actual en cirugía oncológica colorrectal. El objetivo de este estudio es mostrar la experiencia inicial de un sistema de procesamiento de imagen y reconstrucción 3D en la planificación de escisión completa de mesocolon y linfadenectomía D3 en cáncer de colon. Se aplica en un caso de neoplasia de ángulo esplénico, así como en neoplasia de colon derecho con sospecha de infiltración retroperitoneal. Se empleó el procesamiento de imagen y reconstrucción 3D para delimitar un margen intestinal de 10cm proximal y distal al tumor y delimitar la vascularización correspondiente a la tumoración. En el cáncer de colon derecho se mostró la posición y dimensiones exactas del área de linfadenectomía D3 y posible infiltración de la fascia retroperitoneal. El procesamiento de imagen y reconstrucción 3D permite obtener información valiosa a partir de la tomografía computarizada. Esta podría emplearse en la estrategia quirúrgica y así mejorar los resultados oncológicos y disminuir las complicaciones intraoperatorias. (AU)

Mathematical algorithms 3D-reconstruction techniques and artificial intelligence are a current line of innovation in colorectal surgical oncology. The objective of this study is to show the initial experience of a 3D image processing and reconstruction system to perform complete mesocolic excision and D3-lymphadenectomy in colon cancer. It is applied to a splenic flexure neoplasm and in a right colon cancer with suspected retroperitoneal infiltration. 3D image processing and reconstruction was employed to delimit 10cm proximal and distal intestinal margins to the tumor and define its corresponding vascularization. In right colon cancer it showed position and exact dimensions of D3-lymphadenectomy area and possible retroperitoneal fascia infiltration. 3D image processing and reconstruction allows to obtain valuable information from computerized tomography scan. It could be employed during surgical strategy planification to improve oncological results and reduce intraoperative complications. (AU)

Programa Enhanced Recovery After Surgery en un hospital terciario portugués: una auditoría a los primeros 6 meses de implementación en cirugía colorrectal electiva / ERAS programme in a Portuguese tertiary hospital: An audit of the first six months of implementation in elective colorectal surgery

Introducción y objetivos: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) es una estrategia multimodal diseñada para optimizar la recuperación postoperatoria y reducir la morbilidad, la duración de la estancia hospitalaria y los costes de la atención. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el cumplimiento y los resultados clínicos transcurridos 6 meses de la implementación del programa en cirugía colorrectal programada en un hospital terciario. Material y métodos: Se analizaron los datos de 209 pacientes sometidos a cirugía colorrectal electiva, comparándose los primeros 102 pacientes (grupo pre-ERAS) sometidos a cirugía entre enero y mayo de 2018, antes de la implementación del programa, con los 107 tratados entre mayo y octubre de 2019, tras la implementación del programa ERAS. Los resultados principales fueron la educación y el asesoramiento al paciente, el uso de líquidos intravenosos, la movilización temprana, la incidencia de náuseas y vómitos postoperatorios, el retorno de la función intestinal, la duración de la estancia, las complicaciones, la mortalidad y el cumplimiento general. Resultados: El programa ERAS estuvo asociado a un incremento significativo de la educación y el asesoramiento al paciente (p<0,001) y a la reducción significativa de la administración IV de líquidos peri y postoperatoriamente (p=0,007 y p<0,001, respectivamente), así como a las náuseas o vómitos postoperatorios (17,6% vs 5%, p=0,007). El tiempo transcurrido hasta el retorno a las actividades de la vida diaria (5,29 vs. 2,85 días; p<0,001), hasta la ingesta oral de sólidos (6,21 vs. 4,35 días; p<0,001), hasta el primer flato (2,41 vs. 1,51 días; p<0,001) y defecación (3,35 vs. 1,66 días; p<0,001) se redujeron con ERAS. No se produjeron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en cuanto a duración de la estancia, las complicaciones o la mortalidad. Conclusión: El presente estudio reflejó que el programa ERAS mejoró los resultados perioperatorios...(AU)

Introduction and objectives: The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program consists in a multimodal strategy of optimize the recovery of the patient, reduce morbidity, length of hospital stay and hospital costs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the first six months compliance and clinical outcomes after implementation of the program in elective colorectal surgery in a tertiary hospital. Material and methods: An analysis was performed on 209 patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery. The first 102 patients (pre-ERAS group) who underwent surgery between January and May 2018, before the implementation of the program, were compared to the 107 patients treated between May and October 2019, after ERAS implementation. The main outcomes were patient education and counselling, intravenous fluids, early mobilization, postoperative nausea and vomiting, return of bowel function, length of stay, complications, mortality and overall compliance. Results: ERAS program was associated with a significant increase in patient education and counselling (p<0.001) and with a significant reduction in intra and postoperative IV fluids volume (p=0.007 and p<0.001, respectively) and postoperative nausea or vomiting (17.6% vs 5.0%, p=0.007). Postoperative days to recover ADL (5.29 vs 2.85 days; p<0.001), time to solid oral intake (6.21 vs 4.35 days; p<0.001), time to first flatus (2.41 vs 1.51 days; p<0.001) and defecation (3.35 vs 1.66 days; p<0.001) decreased whit ERAS. There was no statistical difference in length of stay, complications and mortality. Conclusion: This study showed that ERAS program allowed to improve perioperative outcomes and postoperative recovery of colorectal patients in this hospital.

Uso de plasma rico en fibrina y leucocitos (PRF-L) para la prevención de fuga anastomótica en anastomosis colorrectal grapada, ensayo clínico aleatorizado

Introducción: La tasa de dehiscencia anastomótica en cirugía colorrectal se estima entre un 4% a 20%. El plasma rico en fibrina y leucocitos (PRF-L) es un concentrado plaquetario de segunda generación y su aplicación en anastomosis colorrectales en animales ha evidenciado interesantes resultados que suponen una menor tasa. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la viabilidad de aplicar L-PRF en cirugía colorrectal y determinar la incidencia de fuga anastomótica después de una anastomosis colorrectal. Materiales y Métodos: El estudio tuvo lugar en el Hospital Clínico Regional de Concepción Chile, en el periodo 2018-2021. Se realizó un ensayo clínico randomizado a 1 ciego. Se incluyeron a 106 pacientes sometidos a anastomosis colorrectal termino-terminal grapada. Se formó un grupo experimental con 53 pacientes y otro control con 53 pacientes. Resultados: A todos se les realizó anastomosis termino-terminal grapada. la indicación de cirugía fue cáncer en 79% y se realizó cirugía video-laparoscópica en 46%. No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas en variables socio-demográficas, ni relacionadas con la cirugía. Hubo dehiscencia anastomótica en 5 pacientes (9,4%) del grupo control y 1 (1,9%) en el grupo experimental sin diferencias estadísticamente significativas (p = 0,24). Conclusiones: A pesar de que no hubo diferencias con significación estadística entre los grupos, se apreció una tendencia en favor del PRF-L. Se logró establecer la seguridad de la aplicación de PRF-L en anastomosis colorrectales.

Introduction: Anastomotic leak rate in colorectal surgery is estimated between 4 and 20 percent. Leukocyte and and platelet-rich fibrin plasma (L-PRF) is second generation platelet concentrate whose application in colorectal anastomosis in animals has shown promising results that suppose a lower leakage rate. Aim: The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of using L-PRF in colorectal surgery and to determine the incidence of anastomotic leak after colorectal anastomosis. Methods: This study took place in Hospital Clínico Regional de Concepción Chile, between years 2018 and 2021. A randomized and one-blinded experimental design was used, that included 106 patients that underwent end-to-end stapled colorectal anastomosis, 53 of them received L-PRF during anastomosis (experimental group). Results: Surgical indication in 79% was cancer and laparoscopic procedure was performed in 46% of patients. There were no statistically significant differences in sociodemographic nor surgery related variables. Anastomotic leak occurred in 5 patients of the control group (9.4%) and 1 patient from de experimental group (1.9%), with no statistically significant differences (p = 0.24). Conclusion: Although we did not detect significant differences among both groups, we observed a tendency favoring L-PRF treatment. We were able to stablish the safety of L-PRF use in colorectal anastomosis.

ERAS programme in a Portuguese tertiary hospital: An audit of the first six months of implementation in elective colorectal surgery.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal strategy designed to optimize postoperative recovery and reduce morbidity, length of hospital stay, and care costs. The aim of this study was to evaluate compliance and clinical outcomes 6 months of implementation of the program in scheduled colorectal surgery in a tertiary hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from 209 patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery were analysed. The first 102 patients (pre-ERAS group) who underwent surgery between January and May 2018, before the implementation of the program, were compared with the 107 patients treated between May and October 2019, after ERAS implementation. The main outcomes were patient education and counselling, use of intravenous fluids, early mobilization, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, return of bowel function, length of stay, complications, mortality, and overall compliance. RESULTS: The ERAS program was associated with a significant increase in patient education and counselling (p<0.001) and with a significant reduction in intra- and postoperative IV fluid administration (p=0.007 and p<0.001, respectively) and postoperative nausea or vomiting (17.6% vs 5.0%, p=0.007). Time to recovery of activities of daily living (5.29 vs 2.85 days; p<0.001), time to solid oral intake (6.21 vs 4.35 days; p<0.001), time to first flatus (2.41 vs 1.51 days; p<0.001) and defecation (3.35 vs 1.66 days; p<0.001) decreased with ERAS. There were no statistically significant differences in length of stay, complications, and mortality. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the ERAS program improved perioperative outcomes and postoperative recovery in patients undergoing colorectal surgery in our hospital.

Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography in colorectal surgery: A retrospective case-control analysis in Mexico.

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: An anastomotic leak is one of the most dreaded complications in colorectal surgery because it increases postoperative morbidity and mortality. The aim of the present study was to identify whether indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICGFA) reduced the anastomotic dehiscence rate in colorectal surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study on patients that underwent colorectal surgery with colonic resection or low anterior resection and primary anastomosis, within the time frame of January 2019 and September 2021, was conducted. The patients were divided into the case group, in which ICGFA was performed for the intraoperative evaluation of blood perfusion at the anastomosis site, and the control group, in which ICGFA was not utilized. RESULTS: A total of 168 medical records were reviewed, resulting in 83 cases and 85 controls. Inadequate perfusion that required changing the surgical site of the anastomosis was identified in 4.8% of the case group (n = 4). A trend toward reducing the leak rate with ICGFA was identified (6% [n = 5] in the cases vs 7.1% in the controls [n = 6] [p = 0.999]). The patients that underwent anastomosis site change due to inadequate perfusion had a 0% leak rate. CONCLUSIONS: ICGFA as a method to evaluate intraoperative blood perfusion showed a trend toward reducing the incidence of anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery.

Escisión meso-rectal total por vía trans anal (TaTME). Experiencia institucional / Trans anal total meso-rectal excision (TaTME). Institutional experience

Introducción. La cirugía es la base del tratamiento curativo del cáncer de recto. La escisión meso-rectal total ha permitido mejorar los desenlaces oncológicos, disminuyendo las tasas de recurrencia locorregional e impactando en la supervivencia global. El empleo de esta técnica en los tumores de recto medio o distal es un reto quirúrgico, en el que la vía trans anal, permite superar las dificultades técnicas. Método. Se realizó un estudio observacional retrospectivo, recolectando la información de los pacientes con cáncer de recto medio y distal llevados a cirugía con esta técnica, en dos instituciones de cuarto nivel en Medellín, Colombia, entre enero de 2017 y marzo de 2022. Se analizaron sus características demográficas, la morbilidad perioperatoria y la pieza quirúrgica. Resultados. Se incluyeron 28 pacientes sometidos al procedimiento trans anal y laparoscópico de forma simultánea; al 57 % se les realizó una ileostomía de protección. Hubo complicaciones en el 60,7 % de los pacientes; ocurrieron cuatro casos de fuga anastomótica. No se presentó ninguna mortalidad perioperatoria. Conclusiones. La tasa de morbilidad perioperatoria es acorde con lo reportado en la literatura. Se resalta la importancia de la curva de aprendizaje quirúrgica y de incluir la calificación de la integridad meso-rectal dentro del informe patológico. Se requiere seguimiento a largo plazo para determinar el impacto en desenlaces oncológicos, calidad de vida y morbilidad

Introduction. Surgery is the pillar of curative treatment for rectal cancer. Total meso-rectal excision has improved oncological outcomes, decreasing locoregional recurrence rates and impacting overall survival. The use of this technique in tumors of the middle or distal rectum is a surgical challenge, in which the trans anal route allows overcoming technical difficulties. Method. A retrospective observational study was carried out, collecting information from patients with middle and distal rectal cancer undergoing surgery with this technique, in two level 4 institutions in Medellín, Colombia, between January 2017 and March 2022. Results. Twenty-eight patients were included; their demographic characteristics, perioperative morbidity, and surgical specimen were analyzed. All patients underwent the trans anal and laparoscopic procedures simultaneously; 57% underwent a protective ileostomy. There was no perioperative mortality. Complications occurred in 60.7% of the patients. Only four cases of anastomotic leak occurred. Conclusions. The perioperative morbidity rate is consistent with that reported in the literature; the importance of the surgical curve and to include the qualification of the meso-rectal integrity within the pathological report is highlighted. Long-term follow-up is required to determine the impact on oncological outcomes, quality of life, and morbidity

Siete años de experiencia en pacientes intervenidos por patología proctológica bajo modalidad cirugía mayor ambulatoria y estudio del grado de satisfacción usuaria

Objetivo: Exponer los resultados de 7 años de cirugía proctológica por cirugía mayor ambulatoria (CMA) y determinar el grado de satisfacción usuaria. Material y Método: Se realizó un estudio observacional descriptivo de pacientes sometidos a cirugía proctológica bajo modalidad CMA en el Hospital Regional de Concepción entre los años 2012 y 2019. Se realizó la encuesta telefónica de satisfacción SUCMA-14. Resultados: Se evaluaron a 632 pacientes en el período de estudio. Con diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre patologías para edad, género e IMC. Se aplicó la encuesta a 270 pacientes que contestaron y respondieron. Los resultados mostraron que en general la percepción de los pacientes es positiva salvo puntuales excepciones, como el dolor postoperatorio para condilomas y hemorroides, y las complicaciones postoperatorias para la enfermedad pilonidal. Cuando se realiza el análisis multivariado a los datos correspondientes a la encuesta, no se logran diferencias significativas entre los diagnósticos, pero al aplicarlo a las variables clínico-quirúrgicas se evidencia, claramente, que existe una distinción entre éstas, en especial para la enfermedad pilonidal. Discusión: Las diferencias en términos de tiempos quirúrgicos, complicaciones y re-hospitalizaciones, no necesariamente afectan la percepción que los pacientes tienen de la CMA, ya que ésta depende de otros factores y no solo de los resultados quirúrgicos. Conclusión: Se obtuvieron resultados acorde a la literatura internacional, con peores resultados para enfermedad pilonidal. La satisfacción usuaria fue positiva en general, sin una clara distinción por patologías. Creemos que la CMA es recomendable en patología proctológica tanto por sus resultados, como por la satisfacción que genera en los pacientes.

Objective: To present the results of 7 years of colorectal surgery on mayor ambulatory surgery (MAS) and to determine patient satisfaction. Methods: A descriptive observational study of patients undergoing proctological surgery under the MAS modality was carried out at Regional Hospital of Concepción between 2012 and 2019. The SUCMA-14 satisfaction survey was applied. Results: 632 patients were evaluated in the study period. With statistically significant differences between pathologies for age, gender and BMI. The survey was applied to 270 patients who answered and responded. The results showed that, in general, the perception of the patients is positive, with exceptions, such as postoperative pain for warts and hemorrhoids, and postoperative complications for pilonidal disease. When the multivariate analysis corresponding to the survey is performed, it does not allow distinguishing between the diagnoses, but when applied to the surgical variables, it clearly shows that there is a distinction between them, with a disadvantage for pilonidal disease. Discussion: The differences in terms of surgical times, complications and re-hospitalizations do not necessarily affect the perception that patients have of the MAS, since it depends on other factors and not only on the surgical results. Conclusion: Results were concordant to what is described in the international literature, with worse results for pilonidal disease. Patient satisfaction was positive in general, without a clear distinction by pathology. We believe that MAS is recommended in proctological pathology both for its results and for the satisfaction it generates in patients.

Application of 3D-reconstruction and artificial intelligence for complete mesocolic excision and D3 lymphadenectomy in colon cancer.

Mathematical algorithms 3D-reconstruction techniques and artificial intelligence are a current line of innovation in colorectal surgical oncology. The objective of this study is to show the initial experience of a 3D image processing and reconstruction system to perform complete mesocolic excision and D3-lymphadenectomy in colon cancer. It is applied to a splenic flexure neoplasm and in a right colon cancer with suspected retroperitoneal infiltration. 3D image processing and reconstruction was employed to delimit 10 cm proximal and distal intestinal margins to the tumor and define its corresponding vascularization. In right colon cancer it showed position and exact dimensions of D3-lymphadenectomy area and possible retroperitoneal fascia infiltration. 3D image processing and reconstruction allows to obtain valuable information from computerized tomography scan. It could be employed during surgical strategy planification to improve oncological results and reduce intraoperative complications.

Frailty assessment has come to stay: Retrospective analysis pilot study of two frailty scales in oncological older patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer is a disease of the elderly and its main treatment is surgery. Frailty, a clinical syndrome of decreased reserve, increases with age and has been recognized as a predictive factor for postoperative mortality. Our primary objective was to assess the association between two frailty scores and mortality within the first year after surgery, by retrospectively linking frailty scores to mortality data and comparing the strength of their association with mortality to that of the ASA Classification. The frailty scales used were: the Modified Frailty Index (MFI) and, the Risk Analysis Index-A (RAI-A) and the G8 screening test (G8). As secondary objectives, we assessed the relationship of the frailty scales with morbidity and compared all the scales with the ASA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 172 patients aged 65 years and older who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer between January 2017 and June 2018, following them up for 1year after surgery. RESULTS: Both morbidity and mortality were significantly associated with all frailty scale scores (p<.001). The more frailty, the greater probability of prolonged hospital stay, complications, readmissions and emergency department visits. Using each scale, patients were categorized into two groups (frail and non-frail patients). The C-indexes for 1-year mortality with the RAI-A and, MFI and G8 were 0.89 and, 0.86 and 0.86 respectively. On the other hand, ASA status is not strongly associated with mortality, with a C-index of .63. DISCUSSION: Frailty scores should begin to influence medical and surgical strategies and further research is needed to develop guidelines for interventions in geriatric patients.

Care burden and outcome of the surgical management of ulcerative colitis: A retrospective analysis of the last 20 years in a tertiary hospital in Spain.

AIM: To analyze the surgical burden of UC care in the last two decades, analyzing the characteristics of the patients, surgical indications along with the short and long-term results. METHOD: Single-center retrospective cohort analysis of UC patients undergoing abdominal and anorectal surgery between January 2000 and December 2020. The care burden, clinical data and results were analyzed according to distribution by decades. RESULTS: 128 patients, 37% female, underwent 376 surgical interventions (296 intestinal procedures and 80 anorectal). Mean follow-up for the cohort was 106±64 months. Timing from diagnosis to first surgery was under 5 years in 53.3%. In the second decade of the study there were fewer operated patients (73 vs. 48) as well as the total number of interventions per patient (2.7 vs. 2.0). The proportion between elective and urgent surgery was reversed in the second decade, observing an increase in laparoscopic surgery (70% vs. 8%) together with a decrease in major postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo≥IIIa) (20% vs 8.4%). 80 patients underwent a restorative proctocolectomy, with a failure of 5% at 1 year but 23.7% in the long term. 37 patients required anorectal surgery, of which 26 (71%) were serial interventions, most due to septic complications of the pouches. CONCLUSIONS: The number of colectomies and interventions per patient decreased in the last decade, while there were improvements in morbidity and surgical approach. The need for sequential surgeries and long-term active instrumental surveillance for possible functional deterioration constitutes a significant clinical burden.

Early and late anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery: A systematic review of the literature / Dehiscencia de anastomosis temprana y tardía en cirugía colorrectal: revisión sistemática de la literatura

The aim of this study was to review and to assess the quality of the scientific articles regarding early and late anastomotic leak (AL) after colorectal surgery and their risk factors.An electronic systematic search for articles on Colorectal Surgery, AL and its timing was undertaken using the MEDLINE database via PubMed, Cochrane and Embase. The selected articles were thoroughly reviewed and assessed for methodological quality using a validated methodology quality score (MINCIR score). This review was registered in the PROSPERO registry under ID: CRD42022303012. 9 articles were finally reviewed in relation to the topic of early and late anastomotic leak.There is a lack of consensus regarding the exact cut-off in time to define early and late anastomotic leak, but it is clear that they are two differentiated entities. The first, occurring in relation to technical factors; whereas the latter, is related to impaired healing. (AU)

El objetivo de este estudio fue revisar y evaluar la calidad de los artículos científicos sobre la dehiscència anastomótica temprana y tardía después de cirugía colorrectal y sus factores de riesgo.Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática electrónica de artículos sobre Cirugía colorrectal, dehiscència de anastomoiis colorectal utilizando la base de datos MEDLINE a través de PubMed, Cochrane y Embase. La calidad metodológica de los artículos seleccionados se revisó minuciosamente y se evaluó mediante una puntuación de calidad metodológica validada (puntuación MINCIR). Este estudio fue registrado en PROSPERO con el ID: CRD42022303012. Despues de una seleccion basada en los criterios de búsqueda, finalmente se revisaron 9 artículos en relación al tema la revisión.Se pudo observar que existe una falta de consenso en cuanto al tiempo de corte exacto para definir la fuga anastomótica temprana y tardía, pero está claro que son dos entidades diferenciadas. La primera, ocurriendo en relación a factores técnicos; mientras que la segunda situación clinica se relaciona con una cicatrización alterada. (AU)

Care burden and outcome of the surgical management of ulcerative colitis: A retrospective analysis of the last 20 years in a tertiary hospital in Spain / Carga asistencial y resultados del tratamiento quirúrgico de la colitis ulcerativa: un análisis retrospectivo de los últimos 20 años en un hospital terciario de España

Aim: To analyze the surgical burden of UC care in the last two decades, analyzing the characteristics of the patients, surgical indications along with the short and long-term results. Method: Single-center retrospective cohort analysis of UC patients undergoing abdominal and anorectal surgery between January 2000 and December 2020. The care burden, clinical data and results were analyzed according to distribution by decades. Results: 128 patients, 37% female, underwent 376 surgical interventions (296 intestinal procedures and 80 anorectal). Mean follow-up for the cohort was 106±64 months. Timing from diagnosis to first surgery was under 5 years in 53.3%. In the second decade of the study there were fewer operated patients (73 vs. 48) as well as the total number of interventions per patient (2.7 vs. 2.0). The proportion between elective and urgent surgery was reversed in the second decade, observing an increase in laparoscopic surgery (70% vs. 8%) together with a decrease in major postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo≥IIIa) (20% vs 8.4%). 80 patients underwent a restorative proctocolectomy, with a failure of 5% at 1 year but 23.7% in the long term. 37 patients required anorectal surgery, of which 26 (71%) were serial interventions, most due to septic complications of the pouches. Conclusions: The number of colectomies and interventions per patient decreased in the last decade, while there were improvements in morbidity and surgical approach. The need for sequential surgeries and long-term active instrumental surveillance for possible functional deterioration constitutes a significant clinical burden. (AU)

Objetivo: Analizar la carga quirúrgica asistencial por CU en 20 años, analizando las características de los pacientes, indicaciones quirúrgicas y resultados a corto y largo plazo. Método: Análisis retrospectivo unicéntrico de pacientes intervenidos de enero del 2000 a diciembre del 2020. La carga asistencial, los datos clínicos y los resultados se analizaron según distribución por décadas. Resultados: Ciento veintiocho pacientes, 37% mujeres, con 376 intervenciones quirúrgicas (296 procedimientos intestinales y 80 anorrectales). El seguimiento medio de la cohorte fue de 106±64 meses. El lapso entre el diagnóstico y la primera cirugía fue <5 años en el 53,3%. En la segunda década del estudio hubo menos pacientes operados (73 frente a 48) y un menor número de intervenciones por paciente (2,7 frente a 2,0). La proporción entre cirugía electiva y urgente se revirtió en la segunda década, observándose un aumento de la cirugía laparoscópica (70% vs. 8%) junto con una disminución de la morbilidad postoperatoria mayor (Clavien-Dindo≥IIIa) (20% vs 8.4%). Se realizó una proctocolectomía restauradora a 80 pacientes, con un fracaso al año del 5% pero del 23,7% a largo plazo. Treinta y siete pacientes requirieron cirugía anorrectal, de los cuales 26 (71%) fueron intervenciones seriadas, la mayoría por complicaciones sépticas de los reservorios. Conclusiones: El número de colectomías y de intervenciones por paciente disminuyó en la última década, a la vez que hubo mejorías en la morbilidad y el abordaje quirúrgico. La necesidad de cirugías secuenciales y de una vigilancia instrumental activa a largo plazo por el posible deterioro funcional constituye una importante carga clínica. (AU)

La evaluación de la fragilidad ha venido para quedarse: Estudio piloto retrospectivo de dos escalas de fragilidad en ancianos oncológicos intervenidos de cirugía colorrectal / Frailty assessment has come to stay: Retrospective analysis pilot study of two frailty scales in oncological older patients undergoing colorectal surgery

Introducción: El cáncer colorrectal es una enfermedad que habitualmente aparece en ancianos y su principal tratamiento continúa siendo quirúrgico. La fragilidad es síndrome clínico que se caracteriza por presentar una disminución de la reserva fisiológica, aumenta con la edad y ha sido reconocido como un factor predictivo de mortalidad postoperatoria. Nuestro objetivo primario ha sido evaluar la asociación entre dos escalas de fragilidad y la mortalidad a un año después de la cirugía, y comparando la fuerza de su asociación del poder predictivo de mortalidad de las escalas de fragilidad y la de la clasificación de la American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA). Las escalas utilizadas fueron: Modified Frailty Index (MFI) y el Risk Analysis Index (RAI-A). Los objetivos secundarios han sido la evaluación de la relación de las escalas de fragilidad con la morbilidad y la comparación de estas con la clasificación ASA en cuanto a predicción de morbilidad. Material y métodos: Analizamos retrospectivamente 172 pacientes mayores de 65 años que fueron intervenidos de cirugía oncológica colorrectal laparoscópica desde enero de 2017 hasta junio de 2018 con un seguimiento de un año posterior a la cirugía. Resultados: La fragilidad esta significativamente asociada a la mortalidad y morbilidad (p < 0,001). A más fragilidad, mayor probabilidad de estancia hospitalaria, complicaciones, reingresos y visitas a urgencias. Los pacientes fueron categorizados en dos grupos (pacientes frágiles y no frágiles). Los C-index de la predicción a mortalidad a un año obtenidos con el RAI-A y el MFI fueron 0,89 y 0,86, respectivamente. Por otro lado, la clasificación ASA no se relaciona con mortalidad, su C-index fue del 0,63. Discusión: Las escalas de fragilidad deberían empezar a influenciar las intervenciones médicas y quirúrgicas, y se deberían implementar guías y protocolos que tuviesen en cuenta el grado de fragilidad de los pacientes geriátricos.(AU)

Introduction: Colorectal cancer is a disease of the elderly and its main treatment is surgery. Frailty, a clinical syndrome of decreased reserve, increases with age and has been recognized as a predictive factor for postoperative mortality. Our primary objective was to assess the association between twohree frailty scores and mortality. within the first year after surgery, by retrospectively linking frailty scores to mortality data and comparing the strength of their association with mortality to that of the ASA Classification. The frailty scales used were: the Modified Frailty Index (MFI) and, the Risk Analysis Index-A (RAI-A) and the G8 screening test (G8). As secondary objectives, we assessed the relationship of the frailty scales with morbidity and compared all the scales with the ASA. Material and methods: We retrospectively studied 172 patients aged 65 years. and older who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer between January 2017 and June 2018, following them up for 1 year after surgery. Results: Both morbidity and mortality were significantly associated with all frailty scale scores (p < 0.001). The more frailty, the greater probability of prolonged hospital stay, complications, readmissions and emergency department visits. Using each scale, patients were categorized into two groups (frail and non-frail patients). The C-indexes for 1-year mortality with the RAI-A and, MFI and G8 were 0.89 and, 0.86 and 0.86 respectively. On the other hand, ASA status is not strongly associated with mortality, with a C-index of 0.63. Discussion: Frailty scores should begin to influence medical and surgical strategies and further research is needed to develop guidelines for interventions in geriatric patients.(AU)

Early and late anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery: A systematic review of the literature / Dehiscencia de anastomosis temprana y tardía en cirugía colorrectal: revisión sistemática de la literatura

The aim of this study was to review and to assess the quality of the scientific articles regarding early and late anastomotic leak (AL) after colorectal surgery and their risk factors.An electronic systematic search for articles on Colorectal Surgery, AL and its timing was undertaken using the MEDLINE database via PubMed, Cochrane and Embase. The selected articles were thoroughly reviewed and assessed for methodological quality using a validated methodology quality score (MINCIR score). This review was registered in the PROSPERO registry under ID: CRD42022303012. 9 articles were finally reviewed in relation to the topic of early and late anastomotic leak.There is a lack of consensus regarding the exact cut-off in time to define early and late anastomotic leak, but it is clear that they are two differentiated entities. The first, occurring in relation to technical factors; whereas the latter, is related to impaired healing. (AU)

El objetivo de este estudio fue revisar y evaluar la calidad de los artículos científicos sobre la dehiscència anastomótica temprana y tardía después de cirugía colorrectal y sus factores de riesgo.Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática electrónica de artículos sobre Cirugía colorrectal, dehiscència de anastomoiis colorectal utilizando la base de datos MEDLINE a través de PubMed, Cochrane y Embase. La calidad metodológica de los artículos seleccionados se revisó minuciosamente y se evaluó mediante una puntuación de calidad metodológica validada (puntuación MINCIR). Este estudio fue registrado en PROSPERO con el ID: CRD42022303012. Despues de una seleccion basada en los criterios de búsqueda, finalmente se revisaron 9 artículos en relación al tema la revisión.Se pudo observar que existe una falta de consenso en cuanto al tiempo de corte exacto para definir la fuga anastomótica temprana y tardía, pero está claro que son dos entidades diferenciadas. La primera, ocurriendo en relación a factores técnicos; mientras que la segunda situación clinica se relaciona con una cicatrización alterada. (AU)

Care burden and outcome of the surgical management of ulcerative colitis: A retrospective analysis of the last 20 years in a tertiary hospital in Spain / Carga asistencial y resultados del tratamiento quirúrgico de la colitis ulcerativa: un análisis retrospectivo de los últimos 20 años en un hospital terciario de España

Aim: To analyze the surgical burden of UC care in the last two decades, analyzing the characteristics of the patients, surgical indications along with the short and long-term results. Method: Single-center retrospective cohort analysis of UC patients undergoing abdominal and anorectal surgery between January 2000 and December 2020. The care burden, clinical data and results were analyzed according to distribution by decades. Results: 128 patients, 37% female, underwent 376 surgical interventions (296 intestinal procedures and 80 anorectal). Mean follow-up for the cohort was 106±64 months. Timing from diagnosis to first surgery was under 5 years in 53.3%. In the second decade of the study there were fewer operated patients (73 vs. 48) as well as the total number of interventions per patient (2.7 vs. 2.0). The proportion between elective and urgent surgery was reversed in the second decade, observing an increase in laparoscopic surgery (70% vs. 8%) together with a decrease in major postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo≥IIIa) (20% vs 8.4%). 80 patients underwent a restorative proctocolectomy, with a failure of 5% at 1 year but 23.7% in the long term. 37 patients required anorectal surgery, of which 26 (71%) were serial interventions, most due to septic complications of the pouches. Conclusions: The number of colectomies and interventions per patient decreased in the last decade, while there were improvements in morbidity and surgical approach. The need for sequential surgeries and long-term active instrumental surveillance for possible functional deterioration constitutes a significant clinical burden. (AU)

Objetivo: Analizar la carga quirúrgica asistencial por CU en 20 años, analizando las características de los pacientes, indicaciones quirúrgicas y resultados a corto y largo plazo. Método: Análisis retrospectivo unicéntrico de pacientes intervenidos de enero del 2000 a diciembre del 2020. La carga asistencial, los datos clínicos y los resultados se analizaron según distribución por décadas. Resultados: Ciento veintiocho pacientes, 37% mujeres, con 376 intervenciones quirúrgicas (296 procedimientos intestinales y 80 anorrectales). El seguimiento medio de la cohorte fue de 106±64 meses. El lapso entre el diagnóstico y la primera cirugía fue <5 años en el 53,3%. En la segunda década del estudio hubo menos pacientes operados (73 frente a 48) y un menor número de intervenciones por paciente (2,7 frente a 2,0). La proporción entre cirugía electiva y urgente se revirtió en la segunda década, observándose un aumento de la cirugía laparoscópica (70% vs. 8%) junto con una disminución de la morbilidad postoperatoria mayor (Clavien-Dindo≥IIIa) (20% vs 8.4%). Se realizó una proctocolectomía restauradora a 80 pacientes, con un fracaso al año del 5% pero del 23,7% a largo plazo. Treinta y siete pacientes requirieron cirugía anorrectal, de los cuales 26 (71%) fueron intervenciones seriadas, la mayoría por complicaciones sépticas de los reservorios. Conclusiones: El número de colectomías y de intervenciones por paciente disminuyó en la última década, a la vez que hubo mejorías en la morbilidad y el abordaje quirúrgico. La necesidad de cirugías secuenciales y de una vigilancia instrumental activa a largo plazo por el posible deterioro funcional constituye una importante carga clínica. (AU)