Aplicaciones clínicas, experimentales y resultados del uso de diferentes dispositivos de aspiración en la cirugía intrarrenal retrógrada. Revisión sistemática / Experimental and clinical applications and outcomes of using different forms of suction in retrograde intrarenal surgery. Results from a systematic review

Objetivo Identificar los últimos avances en los dispositivos de aspiración para la cirugía retrógrada intrarrenal (CRIR) y la ureteroscopia en el tratamiento de la litiasis, y evaluar los resultados de su aplicación. Procedimiento El 4 de enero de 2023 se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica sistemática en Scopus, PubMed y EMBASE. Solo se incluyeron artículos en inglés; se aceptaron estudios en la población pediátrica y estudios en adultos. Se excluyeron los estudios duplicados, los informes de casos, las cartas al editor y los resúmenes de congresos. Hallazgos principales Se seleccionaron 21 trabajos. Se han propuesto varios sistemas de aspiración para la CRIR: a través de la vaina de acceso ureteral o directamente por el endoscopio. La inteligencia artificial también puede desempeñar un papel, monitorizando los valores de la presión y del flujo de irrigación. Todas las técnicas propuestas mostraron resultados perioperatorios satisfactorios en cuanto a tiempo quirúrgico, tasa libre de cálculos (TLC) y fragmentos residuales. Además, la reducción de la presión intrarrenal (mediante la aspiración) también se asoció a una tasa de infección menor. Incluso los estudios que incluyen cálculos renales con un diámetro de 20mm o superior informan de una mayor TLC y una reducción de las complicaciones postoperatorias. Sin embargo, la falta de parámetros bien establecidos para la presión de la aspiración y el flujo de líquido impide la estandarización del procedimiento. Conclusión Como ha sido demostrado en los estudios incluidos, el uso de dispositivos de aspiración en el tratamiento quirúrgico de los cálculos urinarios favorece la obtención de una TLC mayor y reduce las complicaciones infecciosas. La CRIR con sistema de aspiración podría sustituir a la técnica tradicional, gracias a sus ventajas asociadas al control de la presión intrarrenal y aspiración del polvo fino. (AU)

Objective To identify the latest advances in suction devices and evaluate their effect in Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and ureteroscopy for stones. Basic procedures A systematic literature search was performed on 4th January 2023 using Scopus, PubMed, and EMBASE. Only English papers were included; both pediatric and adult studies were accepted. Duplicate studies, case reports, letters to the editor, and meeting abstracts were excluded. Main findings Twenty-one papers were selected. Several methods have been proposed for suction use in RIRS, such as through the ureteral access sheath or directly to the scope. Artificial intelligence can also regulate this system, monitoring pressure and perfusion flow values. All the proposed techniques showed satisfactory perioperative results for operative time, stone-free rate (SFR), and residual fragments. Moreover, the reduction of intrarenal pressure (induced by aspiration) was also associated with a lower infection rate. Even the studies that considered kidney stones with a diameter of 20mm or higher reported higher SFR and reduced postoperative complications. However, the lack of well-defined settings for suction pressure and fluid flow prevents the standardization of the procedure. Conclusion Aspiration device in the surgical treatment of urinary stones favours a higher SFR, reducing infectious complications, as supported by the included studies. RIRS with a suction system provided to be a natural successor to the traditional technique, regulating intrarenal pressure and aspirating fine dust. (AU)

Experimental and clinical applications and outcomes of using different forms of suction in retrograde intrarenal surgery. Results from a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the latest advances in suction devices and evaluate their effect in Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and ureteroscopy for stones. BASIC PROCEDURES: A systematic literature search was performed on 4th January 2023 using Scopus, PubMed, and EMBASE. Only English papers were included; both pediatric and adult studies were accepted. Duplicate studies, case reports, letters to the editor, and meeting abstracts were excluded. MAIN FINDINGS: Twenty-one papers were selected. Several methods have been proposed for suction use in RIRS, such as through the ureteral access sheath or directly to the scope. Artificial intelligence can also regulate this system, monitoring pressure and perfusion flow values. All the proposed techniques showed satisfactory perioperative results for operative time, stone-free rate (SFR), and residual fragments. Moreover, the reduction of intrarenal pressure (induced by aspiration) was also associated with a lower infection rate. Even the studies that considered kidney stones with a diameter of 20 mm or higher reported higher SFR and reduced postoperative complications. However, the lack of well-defined settings for suction pressure and fluid flow prevents the standardization of the procedure. CONCLUSION: Aspiration device in the surgical treatment of urinary stones favours a higher SFR, reducing infectious complications, as supported by the included studies. RIRS with a suction system provided to be a natural successor to the traditional technique, regulating intrarenal pressure and aspirating fine dust.

Ureteroscopia flexible sin vaina de acceso ureteral / Flexible ureteroscopy without ureteral access sheath

Introducción: La vaina de acceso ureteral (VAU) se utiliza ampliamente en la ureteroscopia flexible con litotricia con láser (URSF) por sus mejores tasas de estado libre de cálculos, menor presión intrarrenal y menos complicaciones. Sin embargo, también aumenta los costes quirúrgicos y puede lesionar la pared ureteral. El objetivo principal de nuestro estudio es comparar la seguridad y la eficacia de la URSF con y sin VAU para evaluar la justificación de su uso en todos los casos.Materiales y métodos: Hemos llevado a cabo un estudio analítico observacional retrospectivo con una base de datos prospectiva. Se incluyeron para el análisis un total de 241 pacientes consecutivos que se sometieron a URSF para el tratamiento de cálculos renales y de uréter superior entre enero de 2018 y mayo de 2020 y se dividieron en dos grupos según el uso dela VAU. Se compararon los datos demográficos, las características de los cálculos, la presentación, el tiempo operatorio, la necesidad de catéter ureteral, la infección urinaria posoperatoria, el cólico renal y la necesidad de procedimientos adicionales.Resultados: Un total de 198 pacientes (82,2%) conformaron el grupo sin VAU. El tiempo operatorio fue significativamente menor en el grupo de pacientes sin VAU que en los tratados con VAU (64,6 minutos ± 29,5 vs. 89,9 minutos ±2,8, respectivamente; p 0,010). Ambos grupos presentaron tasas similares de dolor renal e infección del tracto urinario. Los procedimientos auxiliares fueron más frecuentes en el grupo con VAU (37,2 vs. 21,2%; p 0,026), pero no hubo significación en el análisis multivariante.Conclusión: La URSF sin VAU parece ser tan segura como la URSF con VAU, pero requiere menos procedimientos adicionales. Otra de las ventajas es un menor tiempo operatorio (AU)

Introduction: Ureteral access sheath (UAS) is widely used in flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy (FURS) based on better stone-free rates, lower intrarenal pressure and fewer complications. However, it also rises surgical costs and may injure the ureteral wall. The main objective of our study is to compare safety and efficacy of FURS with and without UAS to evaluate whether its use is justified in all cases.Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective observational analytic study based on a prospective database. A total of 241 consecutive patients who underwent FURS for upper ureter and renal stones between January 2018 and May 2020 were included for analysis and divided into two groups upon UAS use. We compared demographic data, stone characteristics, prestenting, operative time, need for ureteral stent, postoperative urinary tract infection, renal colic and need for ancillary procedures.Results: A total of 198 patients (82.2%) were included in the group without UAS. Operative time was significantly shorter in the group of patients without UAS than those with UAS (64.6 minutes ± 29.5 vs. 89.9 minutes ± 2.8 respectively; p 0.010). Both groups had similar rates of colic pain and urinary tract infection. Ancillary procedures were more frequent in the UAS group (37.2 vs. 21.2%; p 0.026), but significance was lost in multivariate assessment.Conclusion: FURS without UAS seems to be as safe as FURS with UAS but requires less ancillary procedures. An additional advantage is shorter operative time (AU)

¿Existe asociación del tiempo entre el urocultivo y la cirugía intrarrenal retrógrada y la tasa de síndrome de respuesta inflamatoria sistémica? / Does time elapsed between urine culture and retrograde intrarenal surgery affect the rate of systemic inflammatory response syndrome?

Objetivo: Identificar los factores preoperatorios e intraoperatorios que podrían causar el síndrome de respuesta inflamatoria sistémica (SRIS) tras la cirugía intrarrenal retrógrada (CRIR) y estudiar el efecto del tiempo de espera entre la fecha del urocultivo vesical preoperatorio (UCVP) y la fecha de la cirugía en el SRIS postoperatorio.Materiales y métodos: La población objetivo la constituyeron 467 pacientes intervenidos mediante CRIR entre enero de 2013 y junio de 2020. Se obtuvieron UCVP de todos los pacientes antes de la cirugía. En el postoperatorio, los pacientes recibieron seguimiento estrecho en busca de fiebre y otros signos de SRIS. Se realizaron análisis de regresión logística univariante y multivariante para revelar los factores predictivos de SRIS después de CRIR.Resultados: La cohorte completa del estudio estaba formada por 467 pacientes. La tasa de SRIS fue del 5,6%. En el análisis univariante, la tasa de diabetes mellitus, los antecedentes de infección urinaria recurrente, el tiempo quirúrgico y la carga litiásica fueron factores predictivos significativos de SRIS. Según el análisis multivariante, la tasa de antecedentes de infección urinaria recurrente, el tiempo quirúrgico y la carga litiásica eran factores predictivos estadísticamente significativos. El tiempo transcurrido entre la fecha de realización del UCVP y la fecha de la cirugía fue el mismo en el grupo con SRIS y en el grupo normal.Conclusión: El intervalo de tiempo entre la fecha de realización del UCVP y la fecha de la cirugía no es un factor influyente para el SRIS. Aclarar esta cuestión mediante estudios prospectivos puede ayudar a resolver este problema con el que los endourólogos se enfrentan con frecuencia en la práctica diaria. (AU)

Objective: To identify the preoperative and intraoperative factors that might cause systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) after retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), and to investigate the effect of time elapsed between the date of performing preoperative bladder urine culture (PBUC) and surgery date on postoperative SIRS.Materials and methods: Four hundred sixty-seven patients who had RIRS between January 2013 and June 2020 constituted the target population of this study. PBUC were obtained from all patients before undergoing surgery. Postoperatively, patients were closely monitored for fever and other signs of SIRS. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to reveal the predictive factors for SIRS after RIRS.Results: The entire study cohort consisted of 467 patients. The rate of SIRS was 5.6%. In univariate analysis, the rate of diabetes mellitus, recurrent urinary tract infection history, surgical time, and stone burden were significant predictive factors for SIRS. In multivariate analysis, the rate of recurrent urinary tract infection history, surgical time and stone burden were observed to be statistically significant predictive factors. Time elapsed between the date of performing PBUC and surgery date was not different between the SIRS group and the normal group.Conclusion: We conclude that the time between the date of performing PBUC and surgery date is not an influential factor for SIRS. Clarifying this issue with prospective studies may be useful, as endourologists frequently encounter this situation in daily practice. (AU)

Flexible ureteroscopy without ureteral access sheath.

INTRODUCTION: Ureteral access sheath (UAS) is widely used in flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy (FURS) based on better stone-free rates, lower intrarenal pressure and fewer complications. However, it also rises surgical costs and may injure the ureteral wall. The main objective of our study is to compare safety and efficacy of FURS with and without UAS to evaluate whether its use is justified in all cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational analytic study based on a prospective database. A total of 241 consecutive patients who underwent FURS for upper ureter and renal stones between January 2018 and May 2020 were included for analysis and divided into two groups upon UAS use. We compared demographic data, stone characteristics, prestenting, operative time, need for ureteral stent, postoperative urinary tract infection, renal colic and need for ancillary procedures. RESULTS: A total of 198 patients (82.2%) were included in the group without UAS. Operative time was significantly shorter in the group of patients without UAS than those with UAS (64.6 minutes ± 29.5 vs. 89.9 minutes ± 2.8 respectively; p 0.010). Both groups had similar rates of colic pain and urinary tract infection. Ancillary procedures were more frequent in the UAS group (37.2 vs. 21.2%; p 0.026), but significance was lost in multivariate assessment. CONCLUSION: FURS without UAS seems to be as safe as FURS with UAS but requires less ancillary procedures. An additional advantage is shorter operative time.

Efficacy of ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of 2-3 cm lower calyceal stones / Eficacia de la nefrolitotomía percutánea ultramini y la cirugía intrarrenal retrógrada en el tratamiento de cálculos caliceales inferiores de 2-3 cm

Abstract We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMP) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the management of lower calyceal stones. A group of 136 patients with a single lower calyceal stone (2-3 cm in diameter) was divided into the UMP or RIRS groups. The average operation time in the RIRS group was significantly longer than that in the UMP group, and the intraoperative blood loss in the former was markedly less than that in the latter. Besides, in the RIRS group, the decreased value of postoperative Hb was obviously lower, the postoperative hospital stay was evidently shorter, and the total hospitalization expenses were markedly less than those in UMP group were. Moreover, the success rate of the first-stage lithotripsy in the UMP group was notably higher than that in RIRS group. The RIRS group had an obviously lower VAS score but a markedly higher BCS score than the UMP group six hours after surgery. At 24 h after operation, the levels of serum CRP, TNF-α and IL -6 in patients in both groups were remarkably increased, and they were evidently lower in the RIRS group than those in the UMP group were. Three days after surgery, the levels of serum CRP, TNF-α and IL -6 were notably lower in the UMP group than those in RIRS group were. RIRS and UMP are safe and effective in the treatment of 2-3 cm lower calyceal stones. The first-stage UMP is characterized by a high stone-free rate (SFR), short operation time and low postoperative infection risk, while RIRS is associated with less blood loss and low total expenses.

Resumen Nuestro objetivo fue comparar la eficacia y seguridad de la nefrolitotomía percutánea ultramini (UMP) y la cirugía intrarrenal retrógrada (CRIR) en el manejo quirúrgico de los cálculos caliceales inferiores. Un grupo de 136 pacientes con un solo cálculo calicial inferior (2-3 cm de diámetro) se dividió en un grupo UMP o un grupo CRIR. El tiempo de operación promedio en el grupo CRIR fue significativamente más largo que en el grupo UMP, y la pérdida de sangre intraoperatoria en el primero fue marcadamente menor que en el segundo. Además, en el grupo CRIR, el valor disminuido de la Hb postoperatoria fue obviamente menor, la estancia hospitalaria postoperatoria fue evidentemente más corta y los gastos totales de hospitalización fueron notablemente menores que los del grupo UMP. Además, la tasa de éxito de la litotricia de primera etapa en el grupo UMP fue notablemente más alta que en el grupo CRIR. El grupo CRIR tuvo una puntuación VAS obviamente más baja pero una puntuación BCS marcadamente más alta que el grupo UMP a seos horas después de la operación. A las 24 h después de la operación, los niveles séricos de PCR, TNF-α e IL -6 en los pacientes de ambos grupos aumentaron notablemente y fueron evidentemente más bajos en el grupo CRIR que en el grupo UMP. Tres días después de la operación, los niveles séricos de PCR, TNF-α e IL -6 fueron notablemente más bajos en el grupo UMP que en el grupo CRIR. Los procedimientos CRIR y el UMP son seguros y eficaces en el tratamiento de cálculos caliciales inferiores de 2-3 cm. El UMP de primera etapa se caracteriza por tener una tasa libre de cálculo (SFR) alta, un tiempo de operación corto y un riesgo de infección posoperatorio bajo, y el RIRS se caracteriza por una menor pérdida de sangre y gastos totales bajos.

Results of minimally invasive procedures for ESWL refractory renal stones smaller than 2 cm: A single center experience. / Resultados de los procedimientos mínimamente invasivos en litiasis renales menores de 2 cm refractarias a litotricia extracorporea. Experiencia individual en un centro.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacyand reliability of endourological procedures in patientswith renal stones up to 2 cm that were found to be resistantto extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). METHODS: 611 patients who had undergone ESWLdue to renal stones up to 2 cm at the ESWL unit of ourclinic, were retrospectively evaluated. Standard percutaneousnephrolithotomy (PNL), micro-PNL, retrogradeintrarenal surgery (RIRS) was performed on the patientswho had stones resistant to ESWL. Demographic data,stone free rate, duration of hospital stay, duration of operation,the duration of scopy, the rates of transfusion andthe complications were recorded. RESULTS: The mean age of 611 patients included tothe current study was 40.76±15.45 years, the meansize of stones was calculated as 205.47±90.5 mm2.While the renal stones were removed in 468 patients(76.59%) after ESWL, endourological procedures wereperformed in 142 patients (23.24%) who had ESWLresistant stones. Standard PNL was performed in 73patients (51.4%), RIRS was performed in 51 patients(35.91%), micro-PNL was performed in 18 patients(12.68%). The success rates after the surgical procedureswere 93.15%, 90.16% and 88.88%, respectively.No major complication was observed in patient groupswho had undergone RIRS and microPNL. CONCLUSION: The surgical approaches, which areselected according to the size and localization of stones,could provide a success rate of 98.03% in ESWLresistant stones and these procedures could be reliablyperformed with considerably lower complication rates.

OBJETIVO: Evaluar la eficacia y fiabilidad de los procedimientos endourológicos en pacientes con litiasis renal de hasta 2 cm resistentes a litotricia extracorporea por ondas de choque (LEOC).MÉTODOS: 611 pacientes que habían recibido LEOC por litiasis renales de hasta 2 cm en la unidad de litotricia de nuestra clínica fueron evaluados retrospectivamente. En los pacientes con cálculos resistentes a LEOC se realizaron nefrolitotomía percútanea estándar,micro-NLP y cirugía intrarenal retrograda (CIRR). Se registraron los datos demográficos, las tasas de pacientes libres de litiasis, duración de la estancia hospitalaria,duración de la operación, duración de la escopia, tasas de transfusiones y las complicaciones. RESULTADOS: La edad media de los pacientes incluidos en el estudio (n=611) fue 40,76±15,45 años, el tamaño medio de la litiasis 205,47±90,5 mm2. La LEOC resolvió la litiasis en 468 pacientes (76,59%) pero en 142 pacientes con litiasis resistentes a LEOC(23,24%) se realizaron intervenciones endourológicas.Se realizó NLP estándar en 73 pacientes (51,4%), CIRR en 51 (35,91%), y micro NLP en 18 (12,68%). Las tasas de éxito después de los procedimientos quirúrgicos fueron del 93,15%, 90,16% y 88,88%, respectivamente. No se observaron complicaciones mayoresen los grupos de pacientes sometidos a CIRR y micro NLP.CONCLUSIÓN: Los abordajes quirúrgicos, que son seleccionadosen función del tamaño y localización de las litiasis, pueden ofrecer una tasa de éxitos del 98,03% en litiasis resistentes a LEOC y estos procedimientos pueden ser realizados de forma fiable con una tasa de complicaciones considerablemente menor.

Safety and efficacy of retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients of different age groups.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) to treat renal stones in different age groups of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 947 patients who underwent RIRS for renal calculi between January 2008 and January 2014. Age at RIRS was analysed both as a continuous and categorical variable and patients were categorized into three age groups; aged ≤ 15 years at surgery (group i, n=51), 16 - 60 years (group Ii, n=726) and>60 years (group iii, n=170). We compared the 3 groups with the regard to stone characteristics, operative parameters and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: The stone-free rate was 78.4% in group i, 77.5% in group ii, and 81.1% in group iii (P=.587). A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that only stone size and stone number had significant influence on the stone-free rates after RIRS. Intraoperative complications occurred 13.7% in group i, 5.6% group ii, and 7.6% in group iii. Overall complication rates in children were higher than adult patients but the differences were not statistically significant. We found that only operation time was associated with the increased risk of intraoperative complications. Peroperative medical complications developed in 8 patients (.8%) in group ii and 2 patients (1.1%) in group iii. A 48-year-old man died from septic shock 5 days after the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: RIRS was observed to be a safe and effective procedure in all age groups of patients with stone disease, therefore age should not be considered as a limiting factor.

Comparison between retrograde intrarenal surgery and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole kidney stones up to 15 mm. Prospective, randomized study.

INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) is currently the recommended treatment for intra-renal calculi smaller than 2 cm. However the low Stone Free Rate (SFR) in lower pole calculi gives rise to new techniques, such us retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), for improve the surgery outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of a treatment with ESWL with RIRS, in terms of SFR after surgery, in patients with kidney stones up to 15 mm in the lower pole. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective study was carried out in order to assess the results of ESWL and RIRS in patients with lower pole stones less than 15 mm. Among a total of 55 patients, 31 were underwent to ESWL (Group 1) and the remaining 24 to RIRS (Group 2). Clinical data recorded, including general characteristics of each patient, were: calculi size, side, operative time, complications according to Clavien scale, SFR and the presence of residual fragments at 2 months post-treatment assessed by a CT scan. STATA 11 was used to perform the statistical analysis. RESULTS: There were no differences for general descriptors among groups with the exception of a significantly longer operative time for RIRS. The rates of SFR and residual fragments lesser than 3 mm. were lower in the RIRS group than in ESWL ones. RIRS also showed a lower rate of clinically significant fragments (0% vs 42.3%. P < .05). In the subgroup of patients with stones between 10/15 mm RIRS showed higher SFR (75% vs. 41.2%) and a lower rate of stones>3 mm (0% vs. 58.8%), being statistically significant (P < .05). Clavien III or higher complications were not reported in any of the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of lower pole stone RIRS has the same results than ESWL in terms of SFR. Regarding absence of a clinically significant residual fragment, RIRS was superior to ESWL. A bigger sample size is required in order to confirm this results.