Simulation-Based Teaching and Learning in Respiratory Care Education: A Narrative Review.

Simulation-based pedagogy has become an essential aspect of healthcare education. However, there is a significant gap in the literature regarding the application of simulation-based modalities in respiratory care education. This review aims to address this gap by providing insight into the theory and current uses of simulation, its effectiveness in respiratory care education, and strategies to enhance faculty development. The study utilizes a narrative synthesis approach to review relevant literature and provide a comprehensive understanding of the topic. The research involved comprehensive searches of electronic databases, including PubMed and Google Scholar, to identify relevant literature, encompassing original articles, reviews, and other pertinent content, focusing on simulation-based teaching and learning in respiratory care education published between 1990 and 2022. Findings suggest that simulation-based education is an effective tool for improving respiratory care education and can enhance the clinical skills of learners. The study concludes by discussing the future of simulation in respiratory care education and the potential benefits it may offer.

Clinical Simulation in the Regulation of Software as a Medical Device: An eDelphi Study.

BACKGROUND: Accelerated digitalization in the health sector requires the development of appropriate evaluation methods to ensure that digital health technologies (DHTs) are safe and effective. Software as a medical device (SaMD) is a commonly used DHT by clinicians to provide care to patients. Traditional research methods for evaluating health care products, such as randomized clinical trials, may not be suitable for DHTs, such as SaMD. However, evidence to show their safety and efficacy is needed by regulators before they can be used in practice. Clinical simulation can be used by researchers to test SaMD in an agile and low-cost way; yet, there is limited research on criteria to assess the robustness of simulations and, subsequently, their relevance for a regulatory decision. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to gain consensus on the criteria that should be used to assess clinical simulation from a regulatory perspective when it is used to generate evidence for SaMD. METHODS: An eDelphi study approach was chosen to develop a set of criteria to assess clinical simulation when used to evaluate SaMD. Participants were recruited through purposive and snowball sampling based on their experience and knowledge in relevant sectors. They were guided through an initial scoping questionnaire with key themes identified from the literature to obtain a comprehensive list of criteria. Participants voted upon these criteria in 2 Delphi rounds, with criteria being excluded if consensus was not met. Participants were invited to add qualitative comments during rounds and qualitative analysis was performed on the comments gathered during the first round. Consensus was predefined by 2 criteria: if <10% of the panelists deemed the criteria as "not important" or "not important at all" and >60% "important" or "very important." RESULTS: In total, 33 international experts in the digital health field, including academics, regulators, policy makers, and industry representatives, completed both Delphi rounds, and 43 criteria gained consensus from the participants. The research team grouped these criteria into 7 domains-background and context, overall study design, study population, delivery of the simulation, fidelity, software and artificial intelligence, and study analysis. These 7 domains were formulated into the simulation for regulation of SaMD framework. There were key areas of concern identified by participants regarding the framework criteria, such as the importance of how simulation fidelity is achieved and reported and the avoidance of bias throughout all stages. CONCLUSIONS: This study proposes the simulation for regulation of SaMD framework, developed through an eDelphi consensus process, to evaluate clinical simulation when used to assess SaMD. Future research should prioritize the development of safe and effective SaMD, while implementing and refining the framework criteria to adapt to new challenges.

Development and evaluation of a clinical simulation-based educational innovation on sexual orientation and gender identity in emergency medicine.

INTRODUCTION: Sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI)-diverse patients are marginalized and poorly cared for in the emergency department, yet well-designed educational interventions to meet this gap are lacking. We developed, implemented, and assessed a novel multi-modal SOGI curriculum on health and cultural humility for emergency medicine physician trainees. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, single-arm evaluation of our educational intervention. A convenience sample of emergency medicine resident physicians (n = 21) participated in the facilitated curriculum including didactic and clinical simulation components. Participants completed a pre- and post-curriculum evaluation that assessed clinical skills, preparedness, attitudinal awareness, and basic knowledge in caring for SOGI-diverse patients. The content of the module was based on a scoping literature review and national needs assessment of Canadian emergency physicians, educators, and trainees along with expert collaborator and input from patient/community partners. The curriculum included a facilitated pre-brief, didactic presentation, clinical simulation modules, and a structured de-brief. Participant clinical skills were evaluated before and after the educational intervention. Our primary outcome was change in clinical preparedness, attitudinal awareness, and basic knowledge in caring for SOGI-diverse patients pre- and post-intervention. RESULTS: Our patient-centered, targeted emergency medicine SOGI health and cultural humility training resulted in a significant improvement in resident self-rated clinical preparedness, attitudes, and knowledge in caring for SOGI-diverse patients. This training was valued by participants. CONCLUSION: We have designed an effective, patient-centered curriculum in health and cultural humility for SOGI-diverse patients in EM. Other programs can consider using this model and developed resources in their jurisdictions to enhance provider capacities to care for this marginalized group.

RéSUMé: INTRODUCTION: L'orientation sexuelle et l'identité de genre (OSIG) - des patients de diverses natures sont marginalisés et mal soignés dans les services d'urgence, mais des interventions éducatives bien conçues pour combler cette lacune font défaut. Nous avons élaboré, mis en œuvre et évalué un nouveau programme multimodal de l'OSIG sur la santé et l'humilité culturelle pour les médecins d'urgence stagiaires. MéTHODES: Nous avons effectué une évaluation prospective de notre intervention éducative à un seul bras. Un échantillon pratique de médecins résidents en médecine d'urgence (n = 21) a participé au programme facilité, y compris les composantes didactiques et de simulation clinique. Les participants ont effectué une évaluation avant et après le programme d'études qui évaluait les compétences cliniques, la préparation, la sensibilisation aux attitudes et les connaissances de base en matière de soins aux patients atteints de diverses OSIG. Le contenu du module était fondé sur une analyse documentaire de portée et une évaluation des besoins nationaux des médecins d'urgence, des éducateurs et des stagiaires canadiens, ainsi que sur un collaborateur expert et les commentaires des patients et des partenaires communautaires. Le programme comprenait un pré-briefing animé, une présentation didactique, des modules de simulation clinique et un débriefing structuré. Les compétences cliniques des participants ont été évaluées avant et après l'intervention éducative. Notre résultat principal était un changement dans la préparation clinique, la sensibilisation aux attitudes et les connaissances de base dans les soins aux patients atteints de diverses OSIG avant et après l'intervention. RéSULTATS: Notre formation sur la santé et l'humilité culturelle axée sur le patient et ciblée en médecine d'urgence SOGI a permis d'améliorer considérablement la préparation clinique, les attitudes et les connaissances auto-évaluées des résidents en matière de soins aux patients SOGI-divers. Cette formation a été appréciée par les participants. CONCLUSIONS: Nous avons conçu un programme efficace et centré sur le patient en matière de santé et d'humilité culturelle pour les patients SOGI-divers en EM. D'autres programmes peuvent envisager d'utiliser ce modèle et d'élaborer des ressources dans leur administration pour améliorer les capacités des fournisseurs de soins à ce groupe marginalisé.

Situational simulation teaching effectively improves dental students' non-operational clinical competency and objective structured clinical examination performance.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate communication with dental patients enhances treatment outcomes and patient satisfaction. Implementing simulated patient interviews courses can improve patient-centered care and reduce conflict during clerkship training. Therefore, this study explored the relationship among student participation in a situational simulation course (SSC), academic performance, clerkship performance, and objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) performance. METHODS: This study was conducted with a sample of fifth-year dental students undergoing clerkship training. After implementing a situational simulation course to investigate the relationship among participation in SSC, academic performance, clerkship performance, and OSCE performance, a path analysis model was developed and tested. RESULTS: Eighty-seven fifth-year dental students were eligible for the SSC, and most (n = 70, 80.46%) volunteered to participate. The path analysis model revealed that academic performance had a direct effect on OSCE performance (ß = 0.281, P = 0.003) and clerkship performance (ß = 0.441, P < 0.001). In addition, SSC teaching had a direct effect on OSCE performance (ß = 0.356, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SSCs can enhance dental students' non-operational clinical competency and OSCE performance effectively. Simulated patient encounters with feedback, incorporated into the dental curricula, have led to improved communication. Based on our findings, we suggest implementing SSC teaching before the OSCE to improve communication and cognitive skills.

A Mathematical Model Based on Stratifying the Severity of Medical Errors for Building Scenarios for Clinical Cases With Branching.

Background There are no mathematical models or score systems available for assessing and creating clinical case simulations based on branching scenario scripts. Objective This study aimed to develop a mathematical model based on stratifying the severity of medical errors for building clinical cases with branching scenarios for clinical simulation. Methods This study was undertaken from August 2020 to August 2023. To build a mathematical model for building scenarios of clinical cases with branching, the classification of the seriousness of medication errors was used. A mathematical model was built for predicting and modeling the development of a clinical situation and as an assessment strategy. The study recruited a total of 34 participants, with 16 participants assigned to the branching scenarios without the mathematical model group and 18 participants assigned to the branching scenarios with the mathematical model group. Results A simple diagram of score based on stratification of the severity of medical errors and correct decisions in clinical practice for building interactive training scenarios with branching was proposed. According to this score system algorithm, each clinical decision-making step is scored points with plus or minus, from 0 to 10. The sum of the points for each block in the decision-making process is then added up. Each step in the overall clinical decision-making strategy is stratified by the proposed algorithm, and finally, the results of internal validation and implementation are presented. Conclusion A mathematical model and score system for building clinical case scenarios based on branching and classification of the seriousness of medication errors was developed. This system could help in the prediction and modeling of the development of events in particular clinical situations and the assessment of competency formation in medical simulation as well.

"We are actually being involved in management of the patient": A qualitative exploration of experiences of students and faculty regarding the use of clinical simulation in Busitema University and Lira University.

Introduction: Experiences regarding the use of simulation in low-resource settings like Uganda where it has not taken root have not been explored. The purpose of the study was to explore the experiences of students, clinical staff, and faculty regarding the use of clinical simulation in teaching undergraduate students. Materials and methods: The study was conducted at Busitema and Lira Universities in Uganda. We conducted 20 in-depth interviews with the faculty staff and 10 focused group discussions with undergraduate Nursing, Midwifery, Medical and Anesthesia students. The study obtained ethical clearance from the Busitema University Research and Ethics Committee (BUFHS-2023-78) and Uganda National Council of Science and Technology (HS3027ES). Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. Results: Four themes emerged from the data. Simulation was seen to be about improvising and (return) demonstration. Concerns of realism were expressed including notions that simulation was not real, that simulation felt real and the extreme end that simulation tends to present the ideal setting. Perceived benefits of simulation include room for mistakes and immediate feedback, enhanced confidence and self-efficacy, enhanced acquisition of soft and clinical skills, prepares students for clinical placement, convenient and accessible. Concerns were expressed related to whether skills in clinical simulation would translate to clinical competence in the clinical setting. Conclusion: Students perceived simulation to be beneficial. However, concerns about realism and transferability of skills to clinical settings were noted. Clarifying preconceived notions against the use of clinical simulation will enhance its utilization in educational settings where simulation is not readily embraced.

Patient safety, what does clinical simulation and teaching innovation contribute?

Clinical simulation in Intensive Care Medicine is a crucial tool to strengthen patient safety. It focuses on the complexity of the Intensive Care Unit, where challenging clinical situations require rapid decision making and the use of invasive techniques that can increase the risk of errors and compromise safety. Clinical simulation, by mimicking clinical contexts, is presented as essential for developing technical and non-technical skills and enhancing teamwork in a safe environment, without harm to the patient. in situ simulation is a valuable approach to practice in realistic environments and to address latent security threats. Other simulation methods as virtual reality and tele-simulation are gaining more and more acceptance. Herein, we provide current data on the clinical utility of clinical simulation related to improved safety in the practice of techniques and procedures, as well as improvements of teamwork performance and outcomes. Finally, we propose the needs for future research.

A Staged Defragmented Simultaneous Debriefing Model As Integrated Micro-debriefing Components Inside Online Simulation for Competencies Formation.

Background Currently, there are no separate debriefing models for online simulation training, and existing models simply imitate the traditional models used in on-site simulation training (the physical presence of individuals, such as students or trainees, in a simulation center). This involves hands-on, in-person training within a simulated environment to enhance practical skills and knowledge in a controlled setting. This scenario does not fully meet the requirements and capabilities of distance learning. Objective To develop a staged defragmented debriefing model as integrated micro-debriefing components inside an online simulation to support the development of clinical decision-making and competencies formation within medical education and offer recommendations to support the use of this debriefing model as a teaching strategy. Methods This descriptive study was conducted from August 2020 to September 2023. To build a staged defragmented debriefing model as integrated micro-debriefing components inside an online simulation for competencies formation the traditional debriefing model's components for on-site simulation training, simulation type, and structure, modern concepts of e-learning, and classification of the seriousness of medication errors were used. The main focus of this study was on providing a detailed account of the debriefing components for online simulation training, features, and implementation of this new teaching model. A total of 38 participants, healthcare professionals, were recruited for this study. The participants were randomly assigned to two groups: one experiencing the staged defragmented debriefing model (n = 20) and the other control group, which received traditional debriefing following simulation training (n = 18). Results The results allowed us to successfully develop a staged defragmented debriefing model inside the simulation that integrates micro-debriefing components located at different points of the simulation scenarios. This teaching approach was successfully implemented in online clinical case scenarios in the "ClinCaseQuest" Simulation Training Platform for continuous medical education. Additionally, an internal validation experiment comparing the effectiveness of the staged defragmented debriefing model with the traditional debriefing method demonstrated superior learning outcomes and participant satisfaction in the staged debriefing group. Conclusions The staged defragmented debriefing model, when integrated into online simulations, represents a promising strategy for advancing clinical decision-making skills and competencies formation in medical education. Implementation of this debriefing model as a teaching strategy holds promise for enhancing learning outcomes in medical education settings. Further research, validation, and implementation are recommended to maximize the model's potential impact on medical education and training.

CyPVICS: A framework to prevent or minimise cybersickness in immersive virtual clinical simulation.

Cybersickness is a global issue affecting users of immersive virtual reality. However, there is no agreement on the exact cause of cybersickness. Taking into consideration how it can differ greatly from one person to another, it makes it even more difficult to determine the exact cause or find a solution. Because cybersickness excludes so many prospective users, including healthcare professionals, from using immersive virtual reality as a learning tool, this research sought to find solutions in existing literature and construct a framework that can be used to prevent or minimise cybersickness during immersive virtual clinical simulation (CyPVICS). The Bestfit Framework by Carrol and authors were used to construct the CyPVICS framework. The process started by conducting two separate literature searchers using the BeHEMoTh (for models, theories, and frameworks) and SPIDER (for primary research articles) search techniques. Once the literature searches were completed the models, theories and framework were used to construct a priori framework. The models' theories and frameworks were analysed to determine aspects relevant to causes, reducing, eliminating, and detecting cybersickness. The priori framework was expanded by, first coding the findings of the primary research study into the existing aspects of the priori framework. Once coded the aspects that could not be coded were added in the relevant category, for example causes. After reviewing 1567 abstracts and titles as part of the BeHEMoTh search string,19 full text articles, a total of 15 papers containing models, theories, and frameworks, were used to construct the initial CyPVICS framework. Once the initial CyPVICS was created, a total 904 primary research studies (SPIDER) were evaluated, based on their titles and abstracts, of which 100 were reviewed in full text. In total, 67 articles were accepted and coded to expand the initial CyPVICS framework. This paper presents the CyPVICS framework for use, not only in health professions' education, but also in other disciplines, since the incorporated models, theories, frameworks, and primary research studies were not specific to virtual clinical simulation.

Evolution of Clinical Simulation Training and Pandemic-Led Acceleration: The International Medical University (IMU), Malaysia Journey.

In many universities, simulation-based learning has finally been inducted as a member of 'the accepted teaching modality community'. This paper is to share the challenges and successes in the journey towards the inclusion of simulation-based learning in the medical curriculum at the authors' university which saw a steep surge during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our teaching and learning that was heavily traditional based went through a dramatic change to adapt to the new norm when the actual environment and patients became out of reach. We followed five factors (5 Fs) that significantly influenced the successful change: fast, force, fellowship, flexibility, and favourable reception.

Exploring How Evidence-Based Practice, Communication, and Clinical Simulation Outcomes Interact in Nursing Education: A Cross-Sectional Study.

(1) Background: Clinical simulation is an educational approach that aims to replicate real-life scenarios. Its primary goal is to help nursing students acquire the necessary knowledge and skills to perform effectively in clinical settings. This study focuses on the relationship between communication skills, evidence-based practice (EBP), and clinical simulation. We aimed to assess how communication skills and EBP competencies affect nursing students' performance in simulated clinical scenarios. (2) Methods: We conducted an observational, cross-sectional study with 180 third-year nursing students at the University of Murcia. We used validated instruments to evaluate the students' EBP competencies, communication skills, non-technical skills, and nursing interventions in simulated scenarios. (3) Results: The results showed that the students had varying competencies in EBP and communication skills. However, there was a positive and statistically significant correlation (p < 0.001) between these variables, non-technical skills, and the simulated clinical scenario nursing interventions. Our regression models revealed that communication skills and EBP competence significantly influenced the performance of the student nurses regarding their clinical and non-technical skills in the simulated scenarios. (4) Conclusions: Communication skills and EBP competencies predict performance in simulated scenarios for nursing students.

Development of a Clinical Simulation Video to Evaluate Multiple Domains of Clinical Competence: Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Medical students in Japan undergo a 2-year postgraduate residency program to acquire clinical knowledge and general medical skills. The General Medicine In-Training Examination (GM-ITE) assesses postgraduate residents' clinical knowledge. A clinical simulation video (CSV) may assess learners' interpersonal abilities. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between GM-ITE scores and resident physicians' diagnostic skills by having them watch a CSV and to explore resident physicians' perceptions of the CSV's realism, educational value, and impact on their motivation to learn. METHODS: The participants included 56 postgraduate medical residents who took the GM-ITE between January 21 and January 28, 2021; watched the CSV; and then provided a diagnosis. The CSV and GM-ITE scores were compared, and the validity of the simulations was examined using discrimination indices, wherein ≥0.20 indicated high discriminatory power and >0.40 indicated a very good measure of the subject's qualifications. Additionally, we administered an anonymous questionnaire to ascertain participants' views on the realism and educational value of the CSV and its impact on their motivation to learn. RESULTS: Of the 56 participants, 6 (11%) provided the correct diagnosis, and all were from the second postgraduate year. All domains indicated high discriminatory power. The (anonymous) follow-up responses indicated that the CSV format was more suitable than the conventional GM-ITE for assessing clinical competence. The anonymous survey revealed that 12 (52%) participants found the CSV format more suitable than the GM-ITE for assessing clinical competence, 18 (78%) affirmed the realism of the video simulation, and 17 (74%) indicated that the experience increased their motivation to learn. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicated that CSV modules simulating real-world clinical examinations were successful in assessing examinees' clinical competence across multiple domains. The study demonstrated that the CSV not only augmented the assessment of diagnostic skills but also positively impacted learners' motivation, suggesting a multifaceted role for simulation in medical education.

Comparative Analysis of the Impact of Training through Simulation Using the Crisis Resource Management Tool for Primary Care Professionals.

This was a prospective observational study based on clinical simulation courses taught in 2017 at the IDEhA Simulation Center of Alcorcón Foundation University Hospital. Two courses in metabolic emergencies (MEs) and respiratory emergencies (REs) were offered to primary care physicians all over Spain. The main objective was to teach nontechnical skills (crisis resource management). Using a modified five-level Kirkpatrick-Phillips education evaluation model, level I (reaction, K1), level II (learning, K2) and level III (behavioral change, K3) changes were evaluated through surveys at the end of the courses and one year later. Thirty courses were held (15 ME courses and 15 RE courses) with 283 primary care physicians. The overall satisfaction (K1) was high: ME courses, 9.5/10; RE courses, 9.6/10. More than 80% of the participants rated the organization, resources, content, debriefing and scenarios as excellent, with no significant differences between the two courses. After one year (156 responses), the respondents for both courses reported that they would repeat the training annually (K2), encourage debriefing with colleagues (K3) and have modified some aspects of their workplace (K3), citing improvements in procedures and in the organization of the health team as the most important. After the ME course, few participants, i.e., 5 (6%), reported providing improved care to patients; after the RE course, 15 (19%) participants reported providing improved care; the difference between groups was significant (p < 0.05). Compared with the ME course, the RE course imparted greater knowledge about patient safety (K2) (38 (49%) vs. 24 (31%) (p < 0.05)) and more useful tools for daily clinical practice (K3) (67% vs. 56.4%) and resulted in participants paying more attention to personal performance and to colleagues when working as a team (K2) (64% vs. 50%). Clinical simulation courses are highly valued and potentially effective for training primary care physicians in patient safety and CRM tools. Future studies with objective measures of long-term impact, behavior in the workplace (K3) and benefits to patients (K4) are needed. Based on the results of our study, the areas that are important are those aimed at improving procedures and the organization of health teams.

Effectiveness of video-assisted debriefing versus oral debriefing in simulation-based interdisciplinary health professions education: A randomized trial.

AIM: We aimed to compare the debriefing experience, simulation assessment, reflection, anxiety and simulation satisfaction of using oral debriefing versus video-assisted debriefing after a simulated clinical session in an interdisciplinary cohort of health sciences students. BACKGROUND: Debriefing is a reflective process that takes place after a clinical simulation and that can be performed either in a traditional way (oral) or using video-assisted debriefing. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in 143 health sciences students (35.7% male, 61.5% female). METHODS: The simulation scenario was designed to evaluate the procedure for donning and doffing personal protective equipment. Differences in debriefing experience, simulation assessment, reflection, anxiety and satisfaction were assessed. RESULTS: Regarding debriefing experience, significant differences were observed for the category "learning" (34.9 (6.13) vs. 36.7 (3.89); p = 0.039). For simulation assessment, significantly higher scores for all categories were identified in video-assisted debriefing compared with oral debriefing (p<0.001). There were also significant differences between the oral debriefing versus video-assisted debriefing for the overall score of reflection ability (86.97 (10.55) vs. 90.74 (9.67); p=0.028) as well as for the category "reflective communication" (24.72 (3.77) vs 26.04 (4.07); p=0.047). Perceived satisfaction was significantly higher in the video-assisted debriefing group compared with oral debriefing group (p <0.001). For anxiety, no significant differences were observed between debriefing groups. CONCLUSION: Video-assisted debriefing after a simulated clinical session improves debriefing experience, simulation assessment, reflection and simulation satisfaction, but does not increase anxiety compared with oral debriefing among health sciences students.

Teaching cardiopulmonary resuscitation using virtual reality: A randomized study.

BACKGROUND: The main functions of healthcare professionals include training and health education. In this sense, we must be able to incorporate new technologies and serious game to the teaching cardiopulmonary resuscitation. METHODS: a multicenter, comparative and cross-sectional study was carried out to assess the learning of resuscitation of a group that was trained with the use of serious gaming with virtual reality, as compared to a control group trained with conventional classroom teaching. RESULTS: the mean quality obtained in chest compressions for the virtual reality group was 86.1 % (SD 9.3), and 74.8 % (SD 9.5) for the control group [mean difference 11.3 % (95 % CI 6.6-16.0), p < 0.001]. Salivary Alpha-Amylase was 218.882 (SD 177.621) IU/L for the virtual reality group and 155.190 (SD 116.746) IU/L for the control group [mean difference 63.691 (95 % CI 122.998-4.385), p = 0.037]. CONCLUSION: using virtual reality and serious games can improve the quality parameters of chest compressions as compared to traditional training.

Implementación del mini-CEX en el pregrado médico: Una experiencia con simulación / Implementation of the Mini-CEX in Medical Undergraduate Education: A Simulation-Based Experience

Resumen La evaluación es un proceso sistemático que resulta en un juicio de valor para tomar decisiones. Los instrumentos empleados para obtener datos sobre el desempeño de los estudiantes requieren de un proceso sistemático y objetivo para su implementación. El mini-CEX es un instrumento de observación directa que ha sido empleado para la evaluación de la competencia clínica en los estudiantes de pre y posgrado desde su invención en 1955. Cuenta con diferentes evidencias de validez para su uso en distintos contextos educativos y clínicos. Permite realizar evaluaciones rápidas, acompañadas de realimentación y que proporcionan información relevante del desarrollo de la competencia clínica. El objetivo de este escrito es exponer la experiencia de la implementación del mini-CEX en el pregrado médico para la evaluación formativa de los estudiantes utilizando la simulación con pacientes estandarizados. Para lograr este objetivo se empleó la siguiente secuencia: búsqueda, planeación, integración y aplicación. Posterior a estos pasos se dan una serie de recomendaciones para la implementación del mini-CEX. Se concluye que la evaluación de la competencia clínica es importante para la mejora continua y permanente de los estudiantes de pre y posgrado. Es necesario sistematizar la evaluación ajustada siempre a objetivos y necesidades específicas de la evaluación.

Abstract Evaluation is a systematic process that results in a judgment to make decisions. The instruments used to obtain data on student performance require a systematic and objective process for their implementation. The mini-CEX is a direct observation tool that has been used for the evaluation of clinical competence in undergraduate and postgraduate students since its invention in 1955. It has different validity evidence for use in different educational and clinical contexts. It allows rapid evaluations, accompanied by feedback and providing relevant information on the development of clinical competence. The objective of this paper is to expose the experience of the implementation of the mini-CEX in the medical undergraduate for the formative evaluation of students using simulation with standardized patients. To achieve this goal, the following sequence was used: search, planning, integration, and application. After these steps we make some recommendations for the implementation of the mini-CEX. Its is concluded that the evaluation of clinical competence is important for the continuous and permanent improvement of undergraduate and graduate students. It is necessary to systematize the evaluation always adjusted to objectives and specific needs of the evaluation.

An Exploration of Nurses' Experience Following a Face-to-Face or Web-Based Intervention on Patient Deterioration.

A web-based clinical simulation program, known as FIRST2ACT (Feedback Incorporating Review and Simulation Techniques to Act on Clinical Trends), was designed to increase the efficacy of clinicians' actions in the recognition and immediate response to a patient's deterioration. This study, which was nested in a larger mixed method project, used ten focus groups (n = 65) of graduate, enrolled, registered nurses, associate nurse unit managers, and general managers/educators/coordinators from four different institutions to investigate whether nurses felt their practice was influenced by participating in either a face-to-face or web-based simulation educational programme about patient deterioration. The results indicate that individuals who were less "tech-savvy" appreciated the flexibility of web-based learning, which increased their confidence. Face-to-face students appreciated self-reflection through performance evaluation. While face-to-face simulations were unable to completely duplicate symptoms, they showed nurses' adaptability. Both interventions enhanced clinical practice by improving documentation and replies while also boosting confidence and competence. Web learners initially experienced tech-related anxiety, which gradually subsided, demonstrating healthcare professionals' resilience to new learning approaches. Overall, the study highlighted the advantages and challenges of web-based and face-to-face education in clinical practice, emphasising the importance of adaptability and reflective learning for healthcare professionals. Further exploration of specific topics is required to improve practice, encourage knowledge sharing among colleagues, and improve early detection of patient deterioration.

PERCEPCIÓN DE LOS ESTUDIANTES DE ENFERMERÍA SOBRE LA SIMULACIÓN CLÍNICA: UN ANÁLISIS DE SU EXPERIENCIA FORMATIVA / NURSING STUDENTS' PERCEPTION OF CLINICAL SIMULATION: AN ANALYSIS OF THEIR FORMATIVE EXPERIENCE

INTRODUCCIÓN: La simulación clínica fortalece la adquisición de competencias clínicas para enfrentar con éxito las situaciones reales de atención sanitaria. OBJETIVO: Determinar la percepción de los estudiantes de enfermería sobre el aprendizaje a través de la simulación clínica. METODOS: Estudio con enfoque cuantitativo de alcance descriptivo transversal, en una muestra de 316 estudiantes, seleccionados mediante muestreo probabilístico estratificado, entre octubre 2022 y febrero 2023. Se utilizó una escala con propiedades psicométricas adecuadas, denominada Escala de Satisfacción de Experiencias Clínicas Simuladas (ESECS), con tres dimensiones: práctica, cognitiva y realismo. Los datos obtenidos fueron procesados con el soporte del programa estadístico SPSS. RESULTADOS: La percepción de los estudiantes es positiva con una media de 8,11 y una desviación estándar de 1,23; el mayor grado de satisfacción corresponde a la dimensión práctica, en las variables motivación y dinamismo de las clases prácticas con un 87,7%, cifras similares con un 82,6%, obtiene satisfacción con los aprendizajes adquiridos y un 78,2% correspondiente a la interacción con docentes y compañeros. CONCLUSIÓN: Se evidencia que la simulación clínica se constituye una metodología de aprendizaje, idónea para el desarrollo profesional en los estudios de enfermería, y es necesario reforzarla de tal forma que permita mejorar la calidad de la formación.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical simulation strengthens the acquisition of clinical competencies necessary to successfully manage real health care situations. OBJECTIVE: Determine the perception of nursing students about learning through clinical simulation. METHODS: A quantitative study with a cross-sectional descriptive approach, using a sample of 316 students selected by stratified probability sampling between October 2022 and February 2023. A scale with adequate psychometric properties was used, the Simulated Clinical Experiences Satisfaction Scale (ESECS), which considered three dimensions: practical, cognitive and realism. The data obtained were processed with the support of the SPSS. RESULTS: Student perception is positive with an average of 8.11, and a standard deviation of 1.23; The greater degree of satisfaction corresponds to the practical dimension: with respect to their practical classes, subjects expressed high satisfaction with the variables of motivation and dynamism (87.7%), with the acquired learning (82.6%) and with the interaction among teachers and classmates (78.2%). CONCLUSION: It is evident that clinical simulation is an ideal learning methodology for professional development in nursing studies, and it is necessary to reinforce it to improve the quality of training.

Evaluación de la simulación de alta fidelidad con actores en cuidados paliativos y estudiantes de Enfermería: un estudio de método mixto / Assessment of high fidelity simulation with actors in palliative care in nursing students: A mixed methods study

Objetivo: Los métodos formativos más efectivos son los experienciales, y entre ellos, los que están centrados en las vivencias y emociones. La simulación clínica, especialmente la de alta fidelidad, es una de las metodologías más efectivas para la adquisición de competencias en cuidados. La simulación con actores puede preparar a los futuros sanitarios en técnicas y competencias intelectuales e interpersonales. El objetivo fue valorar la simulación de alta fidelidad con actores como herramienta en la formación de cuidados paliativos en estudiantes de enfermería. Método: Durante tres años se realizó el estudio en la Facultad de Enfermería de la Universidad de Murcia con estudiantes de enfermería. Se realizó un estudio de método mixto con un diseño secuencial explicativo en tres momentos: 1)Estudio cuasi-experimental con grupo único (n=12) antes y después de cursar la asignatura de cuidados paliativos donde se realizó simulación clínica y se evaluaron competencias de comunicación mediante la escala CICAA. 2)Estudio cualitativo fenomenológico tras la simulación (174 narrativas reflexivas de estudiantes). 3)Estudio transversal observacional, un año después, para valorar la transferencia a la clínica de conocimientos y habilidades (contestaron 71 estudiantes). Resultados: La simulación de alta fidelidad con actores mejora las habilidades comunicativas y la capacidad para establecer una relación de ayuda eficaz tanto con pacientes en la fase final de la vida como con sus familiares. Es una metodología de aprendizaje innovadora, útil y que fomenta la reflexión y el traslado del aprendizaje a la clínica. Conclusiones: Se recomienda la estandarización de metodologías activas de aprendizaje para mejorar la adquisición de habilidades transversales como las de comunicación en cuidados paliativos.(AU)

Objective: The most effective training methods are experiential, including those focused on experiences and emotions. Clinical simulation, especially high-fidelity simulation, is one of the most effective methodologies for the acquisition of competencies in care like palliative care. The simulation with actors can train future healthcare science professionals in technical, intellectual, or interpersonal skills. The objective is to evaluate high-fidelity simulation with actors as a tool in palliative care training for nursing students. Method: Over three years, the study was conducted in the Faculty of Nursing of Murcia with nursing students. A mixed methods study with sequential explanatory design in three moments was conducted: 1)Quasi-experimental study in a single group (n=12) before and after attending the palliative care course with clinical simulation with actors to assess the communication skills (CICAA scale). 2)Qualitative study with phenomenological perspective after clinical simulation (174 reflective students’ narratives). 3)Cross-sectional observational study, one year later, to assess the transfer of knowledge and skills to the clinical practice (71 students). Results: Students who interacted with actors in clinical simulation improved their communication skills and the ability to establish an effective helping relationship with both end-of-life patients and their families. The students perceived the clinical simulation as an innovative learning methodology that is useful to encourage reflection and transfer of learning during their clinical internship. Conclusions: Standardization of the use of active learning methodologies is recommended for a better acquisition of transversal skills such as communication skills in palliative care.(AU)

Satisfacción y desarrollo de competencias en escenarios de simulación clínica de alta fidelidad en estudiantes de Obstetricia / Satisfaction and development of skills in high-fidelity clinical simulation scenarios in Obstetrics students

Introducción: La simulación clínica ha surgido como un método de aprendizaje y de evaluación que genera la adquisición de destrezas y habilidades en las ciencias de la salud. El aprendizaje bajo escenarios de simulación clínica se asocia con mayores niveles de satisfacción, confianza y logro de contenidos al poder practicar las habilidades sin perjuicio al paciente, lo cual es una clara respuesta a la necesidad actual de proteger la seguridad del paciente, y asegurar una formación continua y eficiente. Este estudio busca analizar la relación entre la satisfacción y la adquisición de competencias generadas en estudiantes de Obstetricia de la Universidad Andrés Bello a través de escenarios de simulación clínica de alta fidelidad. Sujetos y métodos: Cuarenta y dos estudiantes de cuarto año de Obstetricia de la Universidad Andrés Bello se enfrentaron a seis escenarios de simulación de alta fidelidad que evaluaron la adquisición de habilidades técnicas para la asistencia del parto y una encuesta de satisfacción para escenarios de simulación de fidelidad.Resultados: La evaluación de las habilidades contó con un promedio de cumplimiento para el primer escenario de un 59,78%; para el segundo, de un 70,29%; para el tercero, de un 71,42%; para el cuarto, de un 81,32%; para el quinto, de un 87,71%; y para el sexto, de un 96,86%. Las estudiantes coinciden en que la simulación es un método útil para el aprendizaje (100%), que es una herramienta que mejora las habilidades técnicas (97,6%), que ha aumentado la seguridad y confianza (100%), y que los escenarios de alta fidelidad fueron satisfactorios (100%). Conclusiones: Los estudiantes de Obstetricia mejoraron sus competencias clínicas, que involucran habilidades comunicacionales y razonamiento clínico, y además perciben altos niveles de satisfacción al realizar seis escenarios de alta fidelidad.(AU)

Introduction: Clinical simulation has emerged as a learning and evaluation method that generates the acquisition of skills and abilities in the field of health sciences. Learning under clinical simulation scenarios is associated with higher levels of satisfaction, confidence, ability to provide information, and content achievement by being able to practice the skills without harming the patient, which is a clear response to the current need to protect the safety of the patient and ensure continuous and efficient training. This study seeks to analyze the relationship between satisfaction and the acquisition of competencies in Obstetrics students at the Andrés Bello University, through high-fidelity clinical simulation scenarios. Subjects and methods: Forty-two Obstetrics students from the Andrés Bello University faced six high-fidelity simulation scenarios that evaluated the acquisition of technical skills for childbirth assistance through an evaluation rubric and a satisfaction survey for high fidelity simulation scenarios.Results: The evaluation of the skills had an average compliance for the first scenario of 59.78%, for the second 70.29%, for the third 71.42%, the fourth 81.32%, the fifth 87 71% and the sixth 96.86%. Regarding the satisfaction in the highfidelity clinical simulation scenarios, the students agree that simulation is a useful method for learning (100%), that it is a tool that improves technical skills (97.6%), that has felt security and confidence (100%) and that the high-fidelity scenarios were satisfactory (100%). High fidelity simulation scenarios prove to be a satisfactory tool for skill acquisition. Conclusion: Obstetrics students improved their clinical competencies, which involve communication skills and clinical reasoning, and also, perceived high levels of satisfaction after 6 high-fidelity scenarios.(AU)