Induction of Endoscopic Response, Remission, and Ulcer-Free Endoscopy With Upadacitinib Is Associated With Improved Clinical Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients With Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the association of achieving endoscopic outcomes at week 12 of induction with improvements in clinical outcomes and quality of life (QoL) at week 52 of maintenance in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD) treated with upadacitinib (UPA). METHODS: This post hoc analysis evaluated data from 2 phase 3 induction trials (NCT03345836 and NCT03345849) and 1 maintenance (NCT03345823) trial. Clinical responders to 12-week induction therapy with UPA who also received 52-week maintenance treatment with UPA were included. Endoscopic response, remission, healing, and ulcer-free endoscopy were assessed at week 12. Meaningful improvements in clinical and QoL outcomes were evaluated at week 52. RESULTS: A significantly greater proportion of patients who achieved an endoscopic response at the end of induction, compared with patients who did not, attained Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission (52.0% vs 34.6%; P ≤ .01), corticosteroid-free CDAI remission (50.0% vs 30.9%), Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire remission (52.6% vs 30.3%), and meaningful improvements in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue response (46.7% vs 25.9%), overall work impairment (47.1% vs 26.5%), and daily activity impairment (53.3% vs 34.1%) (all P < .05) at week 52. Similar findings were observed for patients who achieved endoscopic remission, endoscopic healing, and ulcer-free endoscopy at the end of induction vs those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Early improvement in endoscopic outcomes after UPA induction treatment was associated with long-term meaningful improvements in clinical outcomes and QoL in patients with CD. CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: U-EXCEED induction trial (NCT03345836), U-EXCEL induction trial (NCT03345849), and U-ENDURE maintenance trial (NCT03345823).

In patients with Crohn's disease treated with 12 weeks of upadacitinib, a greater proportion with early improvements in endoscopic response, remission, healing, and ulcer-free endoscopy, vs those without improvements, attained long-term meaningful improvements in clinical outcomes and quality of life.

Clinical Outcomes for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) Patients Ineligible for Front-line Clinical Trials.

Clinical trials for immunotherapy-based regimens in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have extensive inclusion and exclusion criteria. We investigated the clinical outcomes in a real-world cohort of patients who would not have met the criteria for inclusion in front-line mRCC trials. Patients treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab and axitinib/pembrolizumab for front-line mRCC were identified and divided into clinical trial eligible (CTE) and clinical trial ineligible (CTI) cohorts based on key inclusion or exclusion criteria from their respective Phase-3 registration trials. Clinical outcomes were compared in CTE and CTI cohorts. A total of 62 patients treated with axitinib/pembrolizumab and 103 treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab were identified. The International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria were similar across CTE and CTI patients in axitinib/pembrolizumab and ipilimumab/nivolumab cohorts. In the axitinib/pembrolizumab cohort (n = 62), 24 (39%) patients were CTI. The major reasons for the ineligibility were lab abnormalities (n = 11), histology (n = 9), and brain metastases (n = 3). There was no significant difference in response rates (P = 0.08). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was numerically longer in CTE patients (28 vs 12 months; P = 0.09). The overall survival (OS) was higher in the CTE patients (P = 0.02). In the ipilimumab/nivolumab cohort (n = 103), 59 (57%) were CTI. The most common reasons for ineligibility were brain metastases (n = 18), lab abnormalities (n = 16), and histology (n = 16). There was no significant difference in response rates (P = 0.22). However, PFS (P = 0.003) and OS (P < 0.0001) were higher in the CTE patients. In conclusion, many real-world patients are ineligible for RCC clinical trials and had worse outcomes when compared to trial-eligible patients. Additional treatment options are needed for these patients, as well as strategies to include them in prospective trials.

Criteria for assessing evidence for biomarker-targeted therapies in rare cancers-an extrapolation framework.

Background: Advances in targeted therapy development and tumor sequencing technology are reclassifying cancers into smaller biomarker-defined diseases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are often impractical in rare diseases, leading to calls for single-arm studies to be sufficient to inform clinical practice based on a strong biological rationale. However, without RCTs, favorable outcomes are often attributed to therapy but may be due to a more indolent disease course or other biases. When the clinical benefit of targeted therapy in a common cancer is established in RCTs, this benefit may extend to rarer cancers sharing the same biomarker. However, careful consideration of the appropriateness of extending the existing trial evidence beyond specific cancer types is required. A framework for extrapolating evidence for biomarker-targeted therapies to rare cancers is needed to support transparent decision-making. Objectives: To construct a framework outlining the breadth of criteria essential for extrapolating evidence for a biomarker-targeted therapy generated from RCTs in common cancers to different rare cancers sharing the same biomarker. Design: A series of questions articulating essential criteria for extrapolation. Methods: The framework was developed from the core topics for extrapolation identified from a previous scoping review of methodological guidance. Principles for extrapolation outlined in guidance documents from the European Medicines Agency, the US Food and Drug Administration, and Australia's Medical Services Advisory Committee were incorporated. Results: We propose a framework for assessing key assumptions of similarity of the disease and treatment outcomes between the common and rare cancer for five essential components: prognosis of the biomarker-defined cancer, biomarker test analytical validity, biomarker actionability, treatment efficacy, and safety. Knowledge gaps identified can be used to prioritize future studies. Conclusion: This framework will allow systematic assessment, standardize regulatory, reimbursement and clinical decision-making, and facilitate transparent discussions between key stakeholders in drug assessment for rare biomarker-defined cancers.

Next generation probiotics for human health: An emerging perspective.

Over recent years, the scientific community has acknowledged the crucial role of certain microbial strains inhabiting the intestinal ecosystem in promoting human health, and participating in various beneficial functions for the host. These microorganisms are now referred to as next-generation probiotics and are currently considered as biotherapeutic products and food or nutraceutical supplements. However, the majority of next-generation probiotic candidates pose nutritional demands and exhibit high sensitivity towards aerobic conditions, leading to numerous technological hurdles in large-scale production. This underscores the need for the development of suitable delivery systems capable of enhancing the viability and functionality of these probiotic strains. Currently, potential candidates for next generation probiotics (NGP) are being sought among gut bacteria linked to health, which include strains from the genera Bacteroids, Faecalibacterium, Akkermansia and Clostridium. In contrast to Lactobacillus spp. and Bifidobacterium spp., NGP, particularly Bacteroids spp. and Clostridium spp., appear to exhibit greater ambiguity regarding their potential to induce infectious diseases. The present review provides a comprehensive overview of NGPs in terms of their health beneficial effects, regulation framework and risk assessment targeting relevant criteria for commercialization in food and pharmaceutical markets.

Enrollment of underserved racial and ethnic populations in pediatric asthma clinical trials.

Background: The existing data on enrollment trends of historically underserved racial and ethnic children in clinical trials are limited. Objective: We sought to evaluate documentation and representation of race and ethnicity in pediatric asthma clinical trials in the United States. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study of United States-based interventional trials studying pediatric asthma that were completed between 2008 and 2022 and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Enrollment disparities were assessed by using the measure enrollment prevalence difference (EPD) (defined as the median difference between the proportion of participants enrolled and asthma prevalence in the US population by race and ethnicity). Results: Of the 67 trials reviewed, 53 (79.2%) and 36 (53.7%) reported on race and ethnicity at ClinicalTrials.gov, respectively. Most participants were White (39.1%), Black (37.1%), or non-Hispanic (66.1%). Black, Hispanic, multiracial, and White children were enrolled in the expected proportions based on their contribution to asthma burden. However, American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN) (EPD = -1 [95% CI = -1 to -1]) and Asian children (EPD = -3 [95% CI = -3 to -3]) were underrepresented relative to disease burden in these respective groups. Fewer Black children were enrolled in drug or device trials (ß = -0.80 [95% CI = -1.60 to -0.01]) than in other trials. Fewer Hispanic children were enrolled in early-phase than late-phase trials (ß = -2.42 [95% CI = -3.66 to -1.19]). Conclusions: Enrollment in pediatric asthma trials conducted in the United States was commensurate with the demographics of children affected by asthma for most racial and ethnic groups, but American Indian or Alaska Native and Asian children were underrepresented. Concerted efforts are needed to promote inclusion of these underserved groups in future trials.

Breaking Barriers in Alzheimer's Disease: the Role of Advanced Drug Delivery Systems.

Alzheimer's disease (AD), characterized by cognitive impairment, brain plaques, and tangles, is a global health concern affecting millions. It involves the build-up of amyloid-ß (Aß) and tau proteins, the formation of neuritic plaques and neurofibrillary tangles, cholinergic system dysfunction, genetic variations, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Various signaling pathways and metabolic processes are implicated in AD, along with numerous biomarkers used for diagnosis, risk assessment, and research. Despite these, there is no cure or effective treatment for AD. It is critically important to address this immediately to develop novel drug delivery systems (NDDS) capable of targeting the brain and delivering therapeutic agents to modulate the pathological processes of AD. This review summarizes AD, its pathogenesis, related signaling pathways, biomarkers, conventional treatments, the need for NDDS, and their application in AD treatment. It also covers preclinical, clinical, and ongoing trials, patents, and marketed AD formulations.

Multilevel challenges to equitable inclusion of children in trials when parents use languages other than English: A qualitative report from Children's Oncology Group's Diversity and Health Disparities Committee Language Equity Working Group.

BACKGROUND: Increasing representation in clinical trials is a priority for the National Cancer Institute and Children's Oncology Group (COG). Our survey of COG-affiliated institutions revealed that many sites have insufficient processes and resources to enroll children whose parents use languages other than English (LOE). We describe reported barriers and facilitators to enrolling children in clinical trials when parents use LOE and propose opportunities for improvement. PROCEDURES: We sent a 20-item survey to COG-affiliated institutions. Five items allowed respondents to expand on replies to questions about (a) local institutional review board (IRB) requirements regarding translation of consent documents, (b) contributors to provider discomfort consenting parents who use LOE, (c) available language services and resources, and (d) barriers to enrolling children whose parents use LOE or offer ideas about approaches to improvements. Two pairs of researchers independently coded free-text responses and compared results for concordance. RESULTS: A total of 139 (N = 230; 60%) institutions returned the survey. Respondents were mainly physician principal investigators (n = 79/139; 57%) at the United States sites (n = 118/139; 85%) serving less than 100 newly diagnosed children per year (n = 99/139, 71%). They described challenges at multiple levels. Proposed approaches to improvements included centralized provision of translated materials and video educational materials in various languages, and collaborating with IRBs on regulatory processes that protect families and facilitate equitable clinical trial access. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical trial consortia, such as COG, face challenges in enrolling representative samples. Further research is required to design and implement multilevel interventions to ensure equitable access for all, regardless of language used, and mitigate disparate research participation.

Revolutionizing Skin Cancer Treatment: The Rise of PD-1/PDL-1 and CTLA-4 as Key Therapeutic Targets.

Skin cancer is a significant health concern, affecting millions of individuals globally on an annual basis. According to data from the World Health Organization, it stands as the most prevalent form of cancer within the white population. Current treatments for skin cancer typically involve a combination of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery. However, these methods often come with drawbacks, such as side effects and potential scarring. Therefore, there is a growing need for alternative treatments that can offer effective results with fewer adverse effects, driving ongoing research in skin cancer therapy. The advancement of immune checkpoint inhibitors has been facilitated by a more profound comprehension of the interplay between tumors and the immune system, along with the regulatory mechanisms governing T-cells. As cancer treatment continues to evolve, immunotherapy is emerging as a powerful strategy, leading to a growing interest in the role of immunological checkpoints in skin cancer. Various types of immune checkpoints and their expression, including PD-1, PDL-1, CTLA-4, lymphocyte activation gene 3, and B7-H3, along with their blockers and monoclonal antibodies, have been established for various cancers. PD-1, PDL-1, and CTLA-4 are crucial immune system regulators, acting as brakes to prevent T-- cell overactivation and potential autoimmunity. However, tumors can exploit these checkpoints to evade immune detection. Inhibiting these immune checkpoints can enhance the body's ability to recognize and attack cancer cells. This review focuses on the characteristics of PD-1, PDL-1, and CTLA-4 immune checkpoints, their mechanism of action, and their role in skin cancer. Additionally, it summarizes the ongoing clinical trials sponsored or conducted by various pharmaceutical companies and provides insights into the latest patent data.

Proposed Denosumab Biosimilar SB16 vs Reference Denosumab in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: Phase 3 Results Up to Month 12.

CONTEXT: SB16 is a proposed biosimilar to reference denosumab (DEN; brand name: Prolia). OBJECTIVE: This phase 3 randomized, double-blind, multicenter study evaluated the biosimilarity of SB16 to DEN in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO; NCT04664959). DESIGN: The study included 457 PMO patients who had a lumbar spine or total hip T-score between -2.5 and -4. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 60 mg of SB16 or DEN subcutaneously at Month 0 and Month 6. At Month 12, patients were re-randomized to continue with the assigned treatment or switch from DEN to SB16 up to Month 18. This report includes results up to Month 12. METHODS: The primary endpoint was the percent change from baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) at Month 12. Secondary endpoints including the percent change from baseline in BMD of the lumbar spine (except for Month 12), total hip and femoral neck; pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic (serum C-telopeptide of type I collagen [CTX] and procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide [P1NP]), safety, and immunogenicity profiles were measured up to Month 12. RESULTS: The least-squares mean differences in percent change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD at Month 12 were 0.33% (90% confidence interval [CI]: -0.25, 0.91) in the full analysis set and 0.39% (95% CI: -0.36, 1.13) in the per-protocol set; both within the pre-defined equivalence margin. The secondary endpoints were comparable between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSION: The reported efficacy, PK, PD, safety, and immunogenicity data support the biosimilarity of SB16 to DEN.

Drug repurposing against antibiotic resistant bacterial pathogens.

The growing prevalence of MDR and XDR bacterial pathogens is posing a critical threat to global health. Traditional antibiotic development paths have encountered significant challenges and are drying up thus necessitating innovative approaches. Drug repurposing, which involves identifying new therapeutic applications for existing drugs, offers a promising alternative to combat resistant pathogens. By leveraging pre-existing safety and efficacy data, drug repurposing accelerates the development of new antimicrobial therapy regimes. This review explores the potential of repurposing existing FDA approved drugs against the ESKAPE and other clinically relevant bacterial pathogens and delves into the identification of suitable drug candidates, their mechanisms of action, and the potential for combination therapies. It also describes clinical trials and patent protection of repurposed drugs, offering perspectives on this evolving realm of therapeutic interventions against drug resistance.

Data quality assessment of interventional trials in public trial databases.

OBJECTIVE: High quality data entry in clinical trial databases is crucial to the usefulness, validity, and replicability of research findings, as it influences evidence-based medical practice and future research. Our aim is to assess the quality of self-reported data in trial registries and present practical and systematic methods for identifying and evaluating data quality. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We searched ClinicalTrials.Gov for interventional total knee arthroplasty(TKA) trials between 2000-2015. We extracted required and optional trial information elements and used the CTG's variables' definitions. We performed a literature review on data quality reporting on frameworks, checklists, and overviews of irregularities in healthcare databases. We identified and assessed data quality attributes: consistency, accuracy, completeness, and timeliness. RESULTS: We included 816 interventional TKA trials. Data irregularities varied widely: 0% to 100%. Inconsistency ranged from 0% to 36%, most often non-randomized labeled allocation were combined with a "single group" assignment trial design. Inaccuracy ranged from 0% to 100%. Incompleteness ranged from 0% to 61%: 61% finished TKA trials did not report their outcome. As regard to irregularities in timeliness: 49% of the trials were registered more than 3 months after the start date. CONCLUSION: We found significant variations in the data quality of registered clinical TKA trials. Trial sponsors should be committed to ensuring that the information they provide is reliable, consistent, up-to-date, transparent and accurate. CTG's users need to be critical when drawing conclusions based on the registered data. We believe this awareness will increase well-informed decisions about published articles and treatment protocols, including replicating and improving trial designs.

Advancements of engineered live oncolytic biotherapeutics (microbe/virus/cells): Preclinical research and clinical progress.

The proven efficacy of immunotherapy in fighting tumors has been firmly established, heralding a new era in harnessing both the innate and adaptive immune systems for cancer treatment. Despite its promise, challenges such as inefficient delivery, insufficient tumor penetration, and considerable potential toxicity of immunomodulatory agents have impeded the advancement of immunotherapies. Recent endeavors in the realm of tumor prophylaxis and management have highlighted the use of living biological entities, including bacteria, oncolytic viruses, and immune cells, as a vanguard for an innovative class of live biotherapeutic products (LBPs). These LBPs are gaining recognition for their inherent ability to target tumors. However, these LBPs must contend with significant barriers, including robust immune clearance mechanisms, cytotoxicity and other in vivo adverse effects. Priority must be placed on enhancing their safety and therapeutic indices. This review consolidates the latest preclinical research and clinical progress pertaining to the exploitation of engineered biologics, spanning bacteria, oncolytic viruses, immune cells, and summarizes their integration with combination therapies aimed at circumventing current clinical impasses. Additionally, the prospective utilities and inherent challenges of the biotherapeutics are deliberated, with the objective of accelerating their clinical application in the foreseeable future.

Temporary treatment cessation compared with continuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for adults with renal cancer: the STAR non-inferiority RCT.

Background: There is interest in using treatment breaks in oncology, to reduce toxicity without compromising efficacy. Trial design: A Phase II/III multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial assessing treatment breaks in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Methods: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma, starting tyrosine kinase inhibitor as first-line treatment at United Kingdom National Health Service hospitals. Interventions: At trial entry, patients were randomised (1 : 1) to a drug-free interval strategy or a conventional continuation strategy. After 24 weeks of treatment with sunitinib/pazopanib, drug-free interval strategy patients took up a treatment break until disease progression with additional breaks dependent on disease response and patient choice. Conventional continuation strategy patients continued on treatment. Both trial strategies continued until treatment intolerance, disease progression on treatment, withdrawal or death. Objective: To determine if a drug-free interval strategy is non-inferior to a conventional continuation strategy in terms of the co-primary outcomes of overall survival and quality-adjusted life-years. Co-primary outcomes: For non-inferiority to be concluded, a margin of ≤ 7.5% in overall survival and ≤ 10% in quality-adjusted life-years was required in both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. This equated to the 95% confidence interval of the estimates being above 0.812 and -0.156, respectively. Quality-adjusted life-years were calculated using the utility index of the EuroQol-5 Dimensions questionnaire. Results: Nine hundred and twenty patients were randomised (461 conventional continuation strategy vs. 459 drug-free interval strategy) from 13 January 2012 to 12 September 2017. Trial treatment and follow-up stopped on 31 December 2020. Four hundred and eighty-eight (53.0%) patients [240 (52.1%) vs. 248 (54.0%)] continued on trial post week 24. The median treatment-break length was 87 days. Nine hundred and nineteen patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (461 vs. 458) and 871 patients in the per-protocol analysis (453 vs. 418). For overall survival, non-inferiority was concluded in the intention-to-treat analysis but not in the per-protocol analysis [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) intention to treat 0.97 (0.83 to 1.12); per-protocol 0.94 (0.80 to 1.09) non-inferiority margin: 95% confidence interval ≥ 0.812, intention to treat: 0.83 > 0.812 non-inferior, per-protocol: 0.80 < 0.812 not non-inferior]. Therefore, a drug-free interval strategy was not concluded to be non-inferior to a conventional continuation strategy in terms of overall survival. For quality-adjusted life-years, non-inferiority was concluded in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses [marginal effect (95% confidence interval) intention to treat -0.05 (-0.15 to 0.05); per-protocol 0.04 (-0.14 to 0.21) non-inferiority margin: 95% confidence interval ≥ -0.156]. Therefore, a drug-free interval strategy was concluded to be non-inferior to a conventional continuation strategy in terms of quality-adjusted life-years. Limitations: The main limitation of the study is the fewer than expected overall survival events, resulting in lower power for the non-inferiority comparison. Future work: Future studies should investigate treatment breaks with more contemporary treatments for renal cell carcinoma. Conclusions: Non-inferiority was shown for the quality-adjusted life-year end point but not for overall survival as pre-defined. Nevertheless, despite not meeting the primary end point of non-inferiority as per protocol, the study suggested that a treatment-break strategy may not meaningfully reduce life expectancy, does not reduce quality of life and has economic benefits. Although the treating clinicians' perspectives were not formally collected, the fact that clinicians recruited a large number of patients over a long period suggests support for the study and provides clear evidence that a treatment-break strategy for patients with renal cell carcinoma receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy is feasible. Trial registration: This trial is registered as ISRCTN06473203. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment Programme (NIHR award ref: 09/91/21) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 45. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Treatment breaks in cancer are of significant interest to patients and health professionals. Renal cell carcinoma is the most common type of kidney cancer. Sunitinib and pazopanib are both targeted treatments. They were commonly used to treat advanced kidney cancer but often cause side effects, sometimes requiring use of a reduced dose or even stopping treatment. The STAR trial was designed to see whether planned treatment breaks made patients with advanced kidney cancer being treated with sunitinib and pazopanib feel better, without substantially affecting how well the treatment worked. After 24 weeks of treatment, patients took sunitinib and pazopanib either as they normally would or in the alternative way with planned treatment breaks. Treating patients in this way was continued until drug-related side effects stopped treatment, patients' disease worsened while taking treatment or the patient died. The trial compared how well the different treatment strategies worked in terms of how long patients lived and their quality of life over that time. This trial is the largest United Kingdom trial in advanced renal cell carcinoma. Patients took part from 60 United Kingdom centres between 2012 and 2017. It was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment Programme and run by the Leeds Clinical Trials Research Unit. In total, 920 patients took part. Four hundred and sixty-one patients were allocated to continue treatment and 459 were allocated to start at least one treatment break. Treatment breaks lasted on average 87 days. The length of time patients lived in both arms of the trial appeared similar, but this cannot be concluded due to insufficient information. Being allocated to have treatment breaks rather than continuing treatment did not negatively impact a patient's quality of life. Additionally, allocating patients to have treatment breaks was shown to have significant cost savings compared to just continuing treatment. Importantly planned treatment breaks were shown to be feasible.

The role of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants in addressing reduction of Meniere's disease burden: A scoping review.

Objective: To assess the effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) in reducing vertigo, tinnitus, and hearing loss among patients with Meniere's disease (MD). Data Sources: The following databases were utilized in this scoping review: Ovid Medline, PubMed-NCBI, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Clinicaltrials.gov. Method: Studies were identified through the following search phrases: "serotonin specific reuptake inhibitors" OR "tricyclic antidepressants" AND "Meniere's disease." References from included manuscripts were examined for possible inclusion of additional studies. Results: The literature search yielded 23 results, which were screened by three independent reviewers. Seventeen studies and three duplicates were excluded. An examination of references from the included studies yielded two additional publications. A total of four published studies assessing SSRIs and TCAs among 147 patients with MD were ultimately included. Four studies described significant reductions in vertigo attack frequency among patients treated with either SSRIs or TCAs compared to their pretreatment baseline. Three studies assessed the drugs' effects on hearing, of which none found a significant difference among patients treated with SSRIs or TCAs. One study found a significant decrease in patient-reported tinnitus following treatment with TCAs or SSRIs compared to their pretreatment baseline. Conclusions: Data exploring SSRIs and TCAs among patients with MD suggests that these medications may reduce the frequency of tinnitus and vertigo, although there was significant heterogeneity in outcome reporting. There remains a need for larger-scale prospective studies that emphasize objective data to evaluate their effectiveness in reducing common MD symptoms.

The increasing prevalence of cancer in the elderly: An investigation of epidemiological trends.

Cancer poses a significant health threat to the elderly, accounting for a substantial proportion of cancer patients aged 65 and above. As life expectancy continues to rise and the population ages, the incidence of cancer in the elderly is expected to increase further. Age is a major risk factor for the majority of common cancers, with the incidence and prevalence rising as individuals grow older. Factors such as chemoprevention and environmental carcinogen elimination may influence the process of carcinogenesis. Studies reveal that the incidence and mortality rates of various cancers in the elderly and extremely old individuals are on the rise worldwide, with most types peaking around the age of 75 to 90, followed by a sharp decline. Birth cohort and period effects also play a complex role in the connection between aging and cancer risk. Clinical trials often exclude older individuals, limiting our understanding of cancer treatments' effects on this particular age group. More research is needed to focus on the unique requirements of older adults with cancer.

N-of-1 trials in epilepsy: A systematic review and lessons paving the way forward.

OBJECTIVE: Defined as prospective single-patient crossover studies with repeated paired cycles of active and control intervention, N-of-1 trials have gained attention as an option to obtain high-quality evidence of efficacy, particularly for patients with rare epilepsies in whom conduction of well-powered randomized controlled trials can be challenging. The objective of this systematic review is to provide an appraisal of the literature on N-of-1 trials in individuals with epilepsy. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Embase on January 12, 2024, for studies meeting the following criteria: prospectively planned, within-patient, multiple-crossover design in individuals with epilepsy and outcomes related to comorbidities. Information on design, outcome measurements, intervention, and analyses was retrieved. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Risk of Bias in N-of-1 Trials (RoBiNT) scale. We highlighted methodological aspects of the N-of-1 trials identified and discuss future recommendations. RESULTS: Five studies met our inclusion criteria. An additional multiple-crossover trial that evaluated treatment effects exclusively at group level was also included because of its relevance to N-of-1 study methodology. The studies enrolled individuals with focal seizures, absences or cognitive impairement and electrographic discharges. Treatments included established or investigational antiseizure medications, off-label medications, neurostimulation or lifestyle intervention. Three of the five N-of-1 trials reported on individual cases. The studies' strengths were the use of individualized treatment dosages and symptom-specific patient-reported outcomes. Limitations were related to minimal reporting of baseline characteristics and seizure burden. SIGNIFICANCE: The trials identified by our search exemplify how the N-of-1 design can be applied to assess interventions in individuals with epilepsy-related disorders. Future N-of-1 trials of antiseizure interventions should take into account baseline seizure frequency, should apply statistical models suited to capture seizure frequency changes reliably and make predefined interim assessments. Non-seizure outcome measures evaluable over short periods should be considered. Tailored N-of-1 methodology could pave the way to evidence-based, treatment selection for patients with rare epilepsies.

Advances in the approaches used to repurpose drugs for neuroblastoma.

INTRODUCTION: Neuroblastoma (NB) remains a challenging pediatric malignancy with limited treatment options, particularly for high-risk cases. Drug repurposing offers a convenient and cost-effective strategy for treating rare diseases like NB. Using existing drugs with known safety profiles accelerates the availability of new treatments, reduces development costs, and mitigates risks, offering hope for improved patient outcomes in challenging conditions. AREAS COVERED: This review provides an overview of the advances in approaches used to repurpose drugs for NB therapy. The authors discuss strategies employed in drug repurposing, including computational and experimental methods, and rational drug design, highlighting key examples of repurposed drugs with promising clinical results. Additionally, the authors examine the challenges and opportunities associated with drug repurposing in NB and discuss future directions and potential areas for further research. EXPERT OPINION: The fact that only one new drug has been approved in the last 30 years for the treatment of neuroblastoma plus a significant proportion of high-risk NB patients that remain uncurable, evidences the need for new fast and cost-effective alternatives. Drug repurposing may accelerate the treatment development process while reducing expenses and risks. This approach can swiftly bring effective NB therapies to market, enhancing survival rates and patient quality of life.

Risky first-in-human clinical trials on medically fragile persons: owning the moral cost.

The purpose of a first-in-human (FIH) clinical trial is to gather information about how the drug or device affects and interacts with the human body: its safety, side effects, and (potential) dosage. As such, the primary goal of a FIH trial is not participant benefit but to gain knowledge of drug or device efficacy, i.e., baseline human safety knowledge. Some FIH clinical trials carry significant foreseeable risk to participants with little to no foreseeable participant benefit. Participation in such trials would be a bad deal for participants, and the research is considered justifiable because of the promise of significant potential social benefit. I argue that there is an ethical tension inherent in risky FIH research and that researchers should fairly compensate risky FIH trial participants. This does not make the risk-benefit outcome more favorable for participants; rather, it amounts to a collective reckoning with the ethical tension inherent in the research.