Rare case of lupus enteritis presenting as colorectum involvement: A case report and review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystem autoimmune disease that can affect the gastrointestinal tract. Most cases of lupus enteritis (LE) involve the small intestine, while the involvement of the whole colon and rectum without the small intestine being affected is extremely rare. CASE SUMMARY: A 35-year-old woman was diagnosed with colorectal LE after initially presenting with intermittent abdominal pain and vomiting for two months. She had a regular medication history for five years following the diagnosis of SLE but had been irregular in taking medications, which may have contributed to the onset of LE and led to her current hospital admission. According to the 2019 Classification criteria for SLE of the European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology, this case scored 14. Additionally, abdominal computed tomography revealed significant wall edema of the colon and rectum, ischemia and hyperemia of the ascending colon intestinal wall, mesenteric vessel engorgement, increased mesangial fat attenuation, ascites, and bilateral ureter-hydronephrosis, all indicative of colon and rectum LE. Laboratory tests also showed lower levels of complement C3 and C4, with an antinuclear antibody titer of 1:100. Overall, it was clear that this case involved the colon and rectum without affecting the small intestine, representing a rare manifestation of SLE. The patient received treatment with 10 mg of methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 100 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride, hydroxychloroquine (100 mg), and nutrition support. After one week of methylprednisolone and hydroxychloroquine therapy, her SLE symptoms and disease activity improved significantly. CONCLUSION: Although colorectal LE without small intestine involvement is very rare, early diagnosis and excellent management with corticosteroids prevented the need for surgical intervention. Physicians should be aware of colorectal LE without small intestine involvement as a manifestation of lupus flare.

When a Rapid Accurate Diagnosis Changes Therapeutic Approach: Recognizing Acute Abdominal Pain with Ascites as a Possible Presentation of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic, multi-organ autoimmune disease which rarely presents with peritoneal involvement. As such, its diagnosis in the emergency department (ED) based on a clinical presentation of gastrointestinal symptoms is extremely challenging. Yet, reaching such a diagnosis in the ED is crucial for avoiding unnecessary surgical intervention and initiating early glucocorticoid therapy to maximise patient outcomes. Here, we report a case of newly diagnosed SLE in a 28-year-old lady who presented atypically and unusually with abdominal pain and ascites. She required extensive but methodical investigations, and was eventually diagnosed with lupus mesenteric vasculitis with underlying newly diagnosed SLE in the ED. The patient was promptly treated with methylprednisolone resulting in marked clinical improvement. Emergency physicians should be mindful of abdominal pain with ascites as an extremely rare but important clinical presentation of SLE. Early diagnosis and commencement of glucocorticoid therapy in these patients are crucial in halting disease progression and averting the need for surgical intervention.

Clinical features of lupus enteritis: a single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Lupus enteritis (LEn) is a rare complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Timely diagnosis and treatment of LEn are necessary to prevent the most serious consequences - intestinal perforation, gastrointestinal bleeding, and death. We compared the clinical features of SLE patients with and without LEn. METHODS: The clinical data of LEn inpatients at Suining Central Hospital from July 2012 to June 2020 were examined. These LEn patients were matched (1:2 ratio) with concurrently hospitalized SLE patients who did not have LEn. The two groups were compared using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: We compared SLE inpatients with LEn (n = 43) and SLE inpatients without LEn (n = 86) at our institution. Multivariate logistic regression showed that ascites (odds ratio [OR]: 9.961, 95%CI: 2.215-44.802, P = 0.003), hydronephrosis (OR: 28.060, 95%CI: 2.303-341.962, P = 0.009), leukopenia (OR: 5.890, 95%CI: 1.813-19.135, P = 0.003), reduced complement C3 level (OR: 4.791, 95%CI: 1.605-14.300, P = 0.005), and elevated immunoglobin (Ig)A level (OR: 4.040, 95%CI: 1.307-12.487, P = 0.015) were independently associated with LEn. Within the LEn group, abdominal pain was the most common abdominal symptom (88.4%), and increased mesenteric fat attenuation (74.4%) and bowel wall thickening (58.1%) were the most common computed tomography (CT) findings. Most LEn patients (88.4%) required high-dose glucocorticoid therapy (≥ 80 mg methylprednisolone/day), and cyclophosphamide was the most commonly used immunosuppressant (62.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal pain was the most common clinical symptom of LEn. Abdominal CT provides important information for detection and diagnosis of LEn. Ascites, hydronephrosis, leukopenia, hypocomplementemia (C3), and increased IgA were independently associated with LEn.

Targets and Combs: A Case of Lupus Enteritis.

Lupus is a common autoimmune disorder with the potential to affect all organ systems. Lupus enteritis is a rare complication that is seen in a subset of patients that present with gastrointestinal symptoms. Its diagnosis commonly involves imaging, showing bowel wall edema as the target sign and vascular engorgement of bowel vessels as the comb sign on CT scans. These findings can help guide the diagnosis, but they are nonspecific and are also found in other conditions that cause bowel wall ischemia. These symptoms are reversible if treated with immunosuppressants. Unfortunately, recurrence is common in lupus enteritis and perforation needs to be ruled out on presentation. In this report, we present the case of a patient with known lupus who was diagnosed with lupus enteritis on imaging and was treated with immunosuppressants. The patient's symptoms resolved subsequently. Our case highlights the fact that the appropriate diagnosis and management of this condition require physical exams, labs, and imaging.

Accuracy of computed tomographic features in differentiating intestinal tuberculosis from Crohn's disease: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Abdominal computed tomography (CT) can noninvasively image the entire gastrointestinal tract and assess extraintestinal features that are important in differentiating Crohn's disease (CD) and intestinal tuberculosis (ITB). The present meta-analysis pooled the results of all studies on the role of CT abdomen in differentiating between CD and ITB. We searched PubMed and Embase for all publications in English that analyzed the features differentiating between CD and ITB on abdominal CT. The features included comb sign, necrotic lymph nodes, asymmetric bowel wall thickening, skip lesions, fibrofatty proliferation, mural stratification, ileocaecal area, long segment, and left colonic involvements. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated for all the features. Symmetric receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted for features present in >3 studies. Heterogeneity and publication bias was assessed and sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding studies that compared features on conventional abdominal CT instead of CT enterography (CTE). We included 6 studies (4 CTE, 1 conventional abdominal CT, and 1 CTE+conventional abdominal CT) involving 417 and 195 patients with CD and ITB, respectively. Necrotic lymph nodes had the highest diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, 23%; specificity, 100%; DOR, 30.2) for ITB diagnosis, and comb sign (sensitivity, 82%; specificity, 81%; DOR, 21.5) followed by skip lesions (sensitivity, 86%; specificity, 74%; DOR, 16.5) had the highest diagnostic accuracy for CD diagnosis. On sensitivity analysis, the diagnostic accuracy of other features excluding asymmetric bowel wall thickening remained similar. Necrotic lymph nodes and comb sign on abdominal CT had the best diagnostic accuracy in differentiating CD and ITB.

Mesenteric findings of CT enterography are well correlated with the endoscopic severity of Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Maintenance of mucosal healing is a primary goal when treating Crohn's disease (CD). Endoscopy is the most precise method for the assessment of mucosal healing, but is considered overly invasive for patients with CD. In contrast, CT enterography (CTE) is less invasive, but little is known about the correlation between mucosal status and CTE parameters. METHODS: We recruited CD patients who underwent CTE and double balloon endoscopy (DBE) on the same day at our hospital between 2012 and 2014. CTE parameters evaluated included bowel-wall thickening, mural hyperenhancement, mural stratification (target sign), submucosal fat deposition, mesenteric hypervascularity (comb sign), increased fat density, mesenteric fibrofatty proliferation, enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes, and stenosis/sacculation. Endoscopic findings were evaluated using the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD). CTE parameters that were predictive of higher values in the SES-CD were extracted statistically. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were recruited, from which 191 intestinal segments were evaluated. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients showed that the majority of CTE values exhibited mild to moderate correlations with SES-CD values. Notably, multiple ordinal logistic regression analysis demonstrated that CTE findings obtained from the mesenteric area, such as mesenteric hypervascularity (comb sign) and enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes, were more critical predictors of endoscopic mucosal ulceration than those obtained from the bowel wall. CONCLUSIONS: This study was the first of its kind to assess correlations between CTE values and SES-CD values. Mesenteric findings of CTE, rather than mural findings, were highly correlated with the endoscopically evaluated severity of ulceration.

Accuracy of computed tomographic features in differentiating intestinal tuberculosis from Crohn's disease: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Abdominal computed tomography (CT) can noninvasively image the entire gastrointestinal tract and assess extraintestinal features that are important in differentiating Crohn's disease (CD) and intestinal tuberculosis (ITB). The present meta-analysis pooled the results of all studies on the role of CT abdomen in differentiating between CD and ITB. We searched PubMed and Embase for all publications in English that analyzed the features differentiating between CD and ITB on abdominal CT. The features included comb sign, necrotic lymph nodes, asymmetric bowel wall thickening, skip lesions, fibrofatty proliferation, mural stratification, ileocaecal area, long segment, and left colonic involvements. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated for all the features. Symmetric receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted for features present in >3 studies. Heterogeneity and publication bias was assessed and sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding studies that compared features on conventional abdominal CT instead of CT enterography (CTE). We included 6 studies (4 CTE, 1 conventional abdominal CT, and 1 CTE+conventional abdominal CT) involving 417 and 195 patients with CD and ITB, respectively. Necrotic lymph nodes had the highest diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, 23%; specificity, 100%; DOR, 30.2) for ITB diagnosis, and comb sign (sensitivity, 82%; specificity, 81%; DOR, 21.5) followed by skip lesions (sensitivity, 86%; specificity, 74%; DOR, 16.5) had the highest diagnostic accuracy for CD diagnosis. On sensitivity analysis, the diagnostic accuracy of other features excluding asymmetric bowel wall thickening remained similar. Necrotic lymph nodes and comb sign on abdominal CT had the best diagnostic accuracy in differentiating CD and ITB.