Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 7.316
Filtrar
1.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 11: 1425833, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39086951

RESUMO

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is an extremely rare hematological malignancy with a highly aggressive behavior and median survival of <2 years. Especially, most BPDCN patients present with extensive and non-specific skin lesions, usually leading to misdiagnosis as a skin disease and delay therapy. As for treatment, most patients with BPDCN experience relapse shortly after treatment with the traditional regimens. The alleviation of skin symptoms reflects the effects of clinical treatments. Herein, we report a case of a 71-year-old man with intermittent and gradually expanding skin lesions over his chest, abdomen, and back for 1 year. On admission, physical examination revealed extensive skin lesions and multiple enlarged lymph nodes. Laboratory examinations showed pancytopenia and numerous malignant cells in the peripheral blood smear (60%), bone marrow aspirate smear (73.5%). Immunophenotyping using flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry presented large numbers of BPDCN cells in the bone marrow, cervical lymph nodes and dermal tissue. PET/CT revealed multiple enlarged lymph nodes and splenomegaly. Once the diagnosis was identified as BPDCN, the patient began treatment with the oral BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax and subcutaneously administered azacitidine. After the first course, skin lesions reduced markedly and complete remission was achieved in the bone marrow. Our study and current cumulative data according to reviewing systematically suggest that venetoclax combined with azacitidine is safe, effective, and applicable in the treatment of BPDCN, especially for elderly relapsed/refractory patients. This study, therefore, significantly contributes to the literature on the current and future treatment for BPDCN.

2.
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol ; 48: 100818, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39091465

RESUMO

Background: Chemotherapy plus immunotherapy has become the standard first-line treatment of advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but median duration of response is only 7.0-8.3 months and progression-free survival (PFS, ∼6 months) is still far from satisfactory. We aim to evaluate whether early involvement of radiotherapy might improve the treatment outcome if objective response to first-line chemo-immunotherapy was observed in locally advanced or metastatic ESCC. Methods: Patients were retrospectively collected from 3 institutions in China. Patients with histopathologically confirmed diagnoses of locally advanced or metastatic ESCC were identified, who objectively responded to first-line chemo-immunotherapy (complete or partial response, or stable disease) and also received radiotherapy of primary lesions with radiation dose of over 40 Gy, with or without radiotherapy of metastatic lesions before the first disease progression. Results: A total of 72 eligible patients were identified. With median follow-up duration of 14.6 (range, 7.1-34.8) months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 13.5 (95 % CI,10.4-NA) months and 31.8 (95 % CI, 23.0-NA) months, respectively. Median duration from initiation of chemo-immunotherapy to radiotherapy was 2.9 (range, 0-15.1) months. Besides lower tumor burden as a significant factor of better treatment outcome, radiation dose ≥ 50 Gy was associated with superior PFS, while OS might be mainly related to tumor response to the induction chemo-immunotherapy. A low incidence of Grade 3 or above treatment-related adverse events were observed (19 %), and no treatment-related death occurred. Conclusion: Our multi-center retrospective study showed survival benefit brought by early involvement of radiotherapy after first-line chemo-immunotherapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic ESCC. However, further investigation is warranted in future prospective, controlled trials to assess the value of radio-immunotherapy in advanced or metastatic ESCC.

3.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1428584, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39091498

RESUMO

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is considered radio- and chemo-resistant. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated significant clinical efficacy in advanced RCC. However, the overall response rate of RCC to monotherapy remains limited. Given its immunomodulatory effects, a combination of radiotherapy (RT) with immunotherapy is increasingly used for cancer treatment. Heavy ion radiotherapy, specifically the carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT), represents an innovative approach to cancer treatment, offering superior physical and biological effectiveness compared to conventional photon radiotherapy and exhibiting obvious advantages in cancer treatment. The combination of CIRT and immunotherapy showed robust effectiveness in preclinical studies of various tumors, thus holds promise for overcoming radiation resistance of RCC and enhancing therapeutic outcomes. Here, we provide a comprehensive review on the biophysical effects of CIRT, the efficacy of combination treatment and the underlying mechanisms involved in, as well as its therapeutic potential specifically within RCC.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Radioterapia com Íons Pesados , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Neoplasias Renais , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/radioterapia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/imunologia , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Renais/terapia , Neoplasias Renais/radioterapia , Neoplasias Renais/imunologia , Terapia Combinada , Animais , Imunoterapia/métodos
4.
Ther Adv Med Oncol ; 16: 17588359241266156, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39091604

RESUMO

In recent years, with the continuous development of molecular immunology, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have also been widely used in the treatment of gastric cancer, but they still face some challenges: The first is that only some people can benefit, the second is the treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) that occur during treatment, and the third is the emergence of varying degrees of drug resistance with long-term use. How to overcome these challenges, combined therapy based on ICIs has become one of the important strategies. This article summarizes the clinical application of ICIs combined with chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiotherapy, photodynamic therapy, thermotherapy, immune adjuvant, and dual immunotherapy and discusses the mechanism, and also summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of the current combination modalities and the potential research value. The aim of this study is to provide more and more optimized combination regimen for ICI combined therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer and to provide reference for clinical and scientific research.

5.
J Immunother Cancer ; 12(8)2024 Aug 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39097413

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Davoceticept (ALPN-202) is an Fc fusion of a CD80 variant immunoglobulin domain designed to mediate programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-dependent CD28 co-stimulation while inhibiting the PD-L1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) checkpoints. The safety and efficacy of davoceticept monotherapy and davoceticept and pembrolizumab combination therapy in adult patients with advanced solid tumors were explored in NEON-1 and NEON-2, respectively. METHODS: In NEON-1 (n=58), davoceticept 0.001-10 mg/kg was administered intravenous either once weekly (Q1W) or once every 3 weeks (Q3W). In NEON-2 (n=29), davoceticept was administered intravenously at 2 dose levels (0.1 or 0.3 mg/kg) Q1W or Q3W with pembrolizumab (400 mg once every 6 weeks). In both studies, primary endpoints included incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT); type, incidence, and severity of adverse events (AEs) and laboratory abnormalities; and seriousness of AEs. Secondary endpoints included antitumor efficacy assessed using RECIST v1.1, pharmacokinetics, anti-drug antibodies, and pharmacodynamic biomarkers. RESULTS: The incidence of treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) was 67% (39/58) and 36% (21/58) with davoceticept monotherapy, and 62% (18/29) and 31% (9/29) with davoceticept and pembrolizumab combination, respectively. The incidence of ≥grade (Gr)3 TRAEs and ≥Gr3 irAEs was 12% (7/58) and 5% (3/58) with davoceticept monotherapy, and 24% (7/29) and 10% (3/29) with davoceticept and pembrolizumab combination, respectively. One DLT of Gr3 immune-related gastritis occurred during davoceticept monotherapy 3 mg/kg Q3W. During davoceticept combination with pembrolizumab, two Gr5 cardiac DLTs occurred; one instance each of cardiogenic shock (0.3 mg/kg Q3W, choroidal melanoma metastatic to the liver) and immune-mediated myocarditis (0.1 mg/kg Q3W, microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma), prompting early termination of both studies. Across both studies, five patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) exhibited evidence of clinical benefit (two partial response, three stable disease). CONCLUSIONS: Davoceticept was generally well tolerated as monotherapy at intravenous doses up to 10 mg/kg. Evidence of clinical activity was observed with davoceticept monotherapy and davoceticept in combination with pembrolizumab, notably in RCC. However, two fatal cardiac events occurred with the combination of low-dose davoceticept and pembrolizumab. Future clinical investigation with davoceticept should not consider combination with programmed death-1-inhibitor anticancer mechanisms, until its safety profile is more fully elucidated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NEON-1 (NCT04186637) and NEON-2 (NCT04920383).


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Antígeno CTLA-4 , Neoplasias , Humanos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/farmacologia , Masculino , Feminino , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Adulto , Antígeno CTLA-4/antagonistas & inibidores , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/farmacologia , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacologia , Antígeno B7-H1/antagonistas & inibidores , Antígeno B7-H1/metabolismo , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antígenos CD28
6.
BMC Nephrol ; 25(1): 248, 2024 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39090593

RESUMO

Given the substantial burden of chronic kidney disease associated with type 2 diabetes, an aggressive approach to treatment is required. Despite the benefits of guideline-directed therapy, there remains a high residual risk of continuing progression of chronic kidney disease and of cardiovascular events. Historically, a linear approach to pharmacologic management of chronic kidney disease has been used, in which drugs are added, then adjusted, optimized, or stopped in a stepwise manner based on their efficacy, toxicity, effects on a patient's quality of life, and cost. However, there are disadvantages to this approach, which may result in missing a window of opportunity to slow chronic kidney disease progression. Instead, a pillar approach has been proposed to enable earlier treatment that simultaneously targets multiple pathways involved in disease progression. Combination therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease associated with type 2 diabetes is being investigated in several clinical trials. In this article, we discuss current treatment options for patients with chronic kidney disease associated with type 2 diabetes and provide a rationale for tailored combinations of therapies with complementary mechanisms of action to optimize therapy using a pillar-based treatment strategy. [This article includes a plain language summary as an additional file].


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Quimioterapia Combinada , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/complicações , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Nefropatias Diabéticas/tratamento farmacológico
7.
Am Heart J ; 2024 Jul 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39094841

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Blood pressure (BP) control among treated patients in Africa is very suboptimal, with low levels of combination therapy use and therapeutic inertia being among the major barriers to effective control of hypertension. The VERONICA-Nigeria study aims to evaluate, among Black African adults with hypertension, the effectiveness and safety of a triple pill-based treatment protocol compared to Nigeria hypertension treatment protocol for the treatment of hypertension. METHODS: This study involves a randomised, parallel-group and open-label trial. Adults with uncontrolled hypertension (n=300), untreated or receiving monotherapy, with no contraindication to study treatments will be randomly assigned 1:1 to treatment with a triple pill based-treatment protocol or Nigeria hypertension treatment protocol. Follow-up is for 6 months, with interim follow up visits at month 1, 2, and 3. In a non-comparative extension treatment period, participants completing the 6 months randomised period and on ≤3 BP-lowering drugs will receive treatment with the triple pill-based treatment protocol for 12 months. The primary outcome is change in home mean SBP from baseline to month 6, and key secondary efficacy outcome is percentage of participants with clinic BP <140/90 mmHg at month 6. The primary safety outcome is discontinuation of trial treatment due to adverse events from randomization to month 6. Economic evaluation will be conducted to assess the cost-effectiveness of the triple pill-based treatment protocol, and process evaluation will be conducted to understand the context in which the trial was conducted, implementation of the trial and interventions and mechanisms of effect, and potential barriers and facilitators to implementing the intervention in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: The VERONICA-Nigeria trial will provide evidence of effectiveness and safety of the triple-based treatment protocol for the pharmacological management of hypertension, in Black African adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PACTR202107579572114.

8.
Bull Math Biol ; 86(9): 116, 2024 Aug 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39107447

RESUMO

Bladder cancer poses a significant global health burden with high incidence and recurrence rates. This study addresses the therapeutic challenges in advanced bladder cancer, focusing on the competitive mechanisms of ligand or drug binding to receptors. We developed a refined mathematical model that integrates the dynamics of tumor cells and immune responses, particularly targeting fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This study contributes to understanding combination therapies by elucidating the competitive binding dynamics and quantifying the synergistic effects. The findings highlight the importance of personalized immunotherapeutic strategies, considering factors such as drug dosage, dosing schedules, and patient-specific parameters. Our model further reveals that ligand-independent activated-state receptors are the most essential drivers of tumor proliferation. Moreover, we found that PD-L1 expression rate was more important than PD-1 in driving the dynamic evolution of tumor and immune cells. The proposed mathematical model provides a comprehensive framework for unraveling the complexities of combination therapies in advanced bladder cancer. As research progresses, this multidisciplinary approach contributes valuable insights toward optimizing therapeutic strategies and advancing cancer treatment paradigms.


Assuntos
Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Conceitos Matemáticos , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1 , Receptor Tipo 3 de Fator de Crescimento de Fibroblastos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Humanos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/imunologia , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inibidores , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1/imunologia , Receptor Tipo 3 de Fator de Crescimento de Fibroblastos/antagonistas & inibidores , Receptor Tipo 3 de Fator de Crescimento de Fibroblastos/metabolismo , Antígeno B7-H1/imunologia , Antígeno B7-H1/antagonistas & inibidores , Modelos Biológicos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Modelos Imunológicos , Imunoterapia/métodos , Simulação por Computador
9.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 2024 Aug 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39105968

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine the optimum combination therapy of Silodosin-Tadalafil versus Silodosin-Vardenafil in terms of both tolerability and efficacy for the management of distal ureteric stones. METHODS: This prospective, double blinded, randomized clinical trial included 140 patients with distal ureteric stones, randomized into two groups: Group I (n = 67) received Silodosin 8 mg once daily combined with Tadalafil 5 mg once daily, and Group II (n = 68) received Silodosin 8 mg once daily combined with Vardenafil 10 mg once daily. The primary outcome was the tolerability of the combination therapies, assessed through the incidence of adverse events. Secondary outcomes included stone expulsion rate, expulsion time, and the need for analgesics. RESULTS: Both combination therapies demonstrated similar efficacy, with no significant differences in stone expulsion rate (70.1% vs. 67.6%, P = 0.754), expulsion time (19 ± 3 days for both groups, P = 0.793), and analgesic requirements (P > 0.05). However, the Silodosin-Tadalafil combination showed a significantly lower occurrence of adverse events, with notable differences in headache (23.9% vs. 57.4%, P < 0.001), dizziness (32.8% vs. 60.3%, P = 0.001), and gastrointestinal upset (9% vs. 66.2%, P < 0.001), and other adverse effects. The overall occurrence of any adverse event was significantly lower in the Silodosin-Tadalafil group (88.1% vs. 98.5%, P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Both Silodosin-Tadalafil and Silodosin-Vardenafil therapies are effective in managing distal ureteric stones. However, the Silodosin-Tadalafil combination is associated with a significantly lower incidence of adverse events, making it a more tolerable option for patients.

10.
Adv Sci (Weinh) ; : e2405886, 2024 Aug 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39101234

RESUMO

Microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer (MSS-CRC) exhibits resistance to programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) therapy. Improving the infiltration and tumor recognition of cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs) is a promising strategy, but it encounters huge challenges from drug delivery and mechanisms aspects. Here, a zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF) coated with apoptotic body membranes derived from MSS-CRC cells is engineered for the co-delivery of ginsenoside Rg1 (Rg1) and atractylenolide-I (Att) to MSS-CRC, named as Ab@Rg1/Att-ZIF. This system is selectively engulfed by Ly-6C+ monocytes during blood circulation and utilizes a "hitchhiking" mechanism to migrate toward the core of MSS-CRC. Ab@Rg1/Att-ZIF undergoes rapid disassembly in the tumor, released Rg1 promotes the processing and transportation of tumor antigens in dendritic cells (DCs), enhancing their maturation. Meanwhile, Att enhances the activity of the 26S proteasome complex in tumor cells, leading to increased expression of major histocompatibility complex class-I (MHC-I). These coordinated actions enhance the infiltration and recognition of CTLs in the center of MSS-CRC, significantly improving the tumor inhibition of PD-1 treatment from ≈5% to ≈69%. This innovative design, involving inflammation-guided precise drug co-delivery and a rational combination, achieves synergistic engineering of the tumor microenvironment, providing a novel strategy for successful PD-1 treatment of MSS-CRC.

11.
Int J Nanomedicine ; 19: 7775-7797, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39099795

RESUMO

Purpose: The present study aimed to develop a lipid nanoplatform, denoted as "BAL-PTX-LN", co-loaded with chiral baicalin derivatives (BAL) and paclitaxel (PTX) to promote the anti-lung cancer efficacy of paclitaxel and reduce the toxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs. Methods: BAL-PTX-LN was optimized through central composite design based on a single-factor experiments. BAL-PTX-LN was evaluated by TEM, particle size, encapsulation efficiency, hemolysis rate, release kinetics and stability. And was evaluated by pharmacokinetics and the antitumor efficacy studied both in vitro and in vivo. The in vivo safety profile of the formulation was assessed using hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining. Results: BAL-PTX-LN exhibited spherical morphology with a particle size of 134.36 ± 3.18 nm, PDI of 0.24 ± 0.02, and with an encapsulation efficiency exceeding 90%, BAL-PTX-LN remained stable after 180 days storage. In vitro release studies revealed a zero-order kinetic model of PTX from the liposomal formulation. No hemolysis was observed in the preparation group. Pharmacokinetic analysis of PTX in the BAL-PTX-LN group revealed an approximately three-fold higher bioavailability and twice longer t1/2 compared to the bulk drug group. Furthermore, the IC50 of BAL-PTX-LN decreased by 2.35 times (13.48 µg/mL vs 31.722 µg/mL) and the apoptosis rate increased by 1.82 times (29.38% vs 16.13%) at 24 h compared to the PTX group. In tumor-bearing nude mice, the BAL-PTX-LN formulation exhibited a two-fold higher tumor inhibition rate compared to the PTX group (62.83% vs 29.95%), accompanied by a ten-fold decrease in Ki67 expression (4.26% vs 45.88%). Interestingly, HE staining revealed no pathological changes in tissues from the BAL-PTX-LN group, whereas tissues from the PTX group exhibited pathological changes and tumor cell infiltration. Conclusion: BAL-PTX-LN improves the therapeutic effect of poorly soluble chemotherapeutic drugs on lung cancer, which is anticipated to emerge as a viable therapeutic agent for lung cancer in clinical applications.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Paclitaxel , Paclitaxel/química , Paclitaxel/farmacocinética , Paclitaxel/farmacologia , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Animais , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Humanos , Flavonoides/química , Flavonoides/farmacologia , Flavonoides/farmacocinética , Flavonoides/administração & dosagem , Tamanho da Partícula , Nanopartículas/química , Camundongos , Lipossomos/química , Lipossomos/farmacocinética , Células A549 , Lipídeos/química , Masculino , Camundongos Endogâmicos BALB C , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Liberação Controlada de Fármacos , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/farmacologia , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/química , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/farmacocinética , Camundongos Nus , Hemólise/efeitos dos fármacos , Antineoplásicos/química , Antineoplásicos/farmacologia , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem
12.
J Immunother Cancer ; 12(8)2024 Aug 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39107131

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Checkpoint inhibitor therapy has demonstrated overall survival benefit in multiple tumor types. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is a predictive biomarker for response to immunotherapies. This study evaluated the efficacy of nivolumab+ipilimumab in multiple tumor types based on TMB status evaluated using either tumor tissue (tTMB) or circulating tumor DNA in the blood (bTMB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic or unresectable solid tumors with high (≥10 mutations per megabase) tTMB (tTMB-H) and/or bTMB (bTMB-H) who were refractory to standard therapies were randomized 2:1 to receive nivolumab+ipilimumab or nivolumab monotherapy in an open-label, phase 2 study (CheckMate 848; NCT03668119). tTMB and bTMB were determined by the Foundation Medicine FoundationOne® CDx test and bTMB Clinical Trial Assay, respectively. The dual primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) in patients with tTMB-H and/or bTMB-H tumors treated with nivolumab+ipilimumab. RESULTS: In total, 201 patients refractory to standard therapies were randomized: 135 had tTMB-H and 125 had bTMB-H; 82 patients had dual tTMB-H/bTMB-H. In patients with tTMB-H, ORR was 38.6% (95% CI 28.4% to 49.6%) with nivolumab+ipilimumab and 29.8% (95% CI 17.3% to 44.9%) with nivolumab monotherapy. In patients with bTMB-H, ORR was 22.5% (95% CI 13.9% to 33.2%) with nivolumab+ipilimumab and 15.6% (95% CI 6.5% to 29.5%) with nivolumab monotherapy. Early and durable responses to treatment with nivolumab+ipilimumab were seen in patients with tTMB-H or bTMB-H. The safety profile of nivolumab+ipilimumab was manageable, with no new safety signals. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with metastatic or unresectable solid tumors with TMB-H, as determined by tissue biopsy or by blood sample when tissue biopsy is unavailable, who have no other treatment options, may benefit from nivolumab+ipilimumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03668119.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Ipilimumab , Neoplasias , Nivolumabe , Humanos , Nivolumabe/uso terapêutico , Nivolumabe/administração & dosagem , Nivolumabe/farmacologia , Feminino , Ipilimumab/uso terapêutico , Ipilimumab/administração & dosagem , Ipilimumab/farmacologia , Masculino , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/genética , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Mutação , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Metástase Neoplásica
13.
Eur J Heart Fail ; 2024 Jul 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38966990

RESUMO

AIMS: According to current guidelines, initial monotherapy should be considered for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients with cardiopulmonary comorbidities. This analysis of combined data from the TRITON and REPAIR clinical trials, assesses efficacy and safety of initial double combination therapy in patients without vs. with 1-2 cardiac comorbidities. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were combined for patients from TRITON (NCT02558231) and REPAIR (NCT02310672) on initial macitentan and tadalafil double combination therapy (overall set, n = 148) and two subgroups defined as patients without cardiac comorbidities (n = 62) and those with 1-2 cardiac comorbidities (n = 78). Patients with ≥3 comorbidities were excluded from these studies. For the overall set, the median (Q1-Q3) duration of combined macitentan and tadalafil exposure was 513.0 (364.0-778.0) days, and was similar between subgroups. Change from baseline to Week 26 for pulmonary vascular resistance was -55% and -50% for patients without and with 1-2 cardiac comorbidities, respectively; marked improvements in other hemodynamic and functional parameters were also observed, although functional parameters improved to a lesser extent in patients with comorbidities. At Week 26, the majority of patients had improved PAH risk status, according to the non-invasive four-strata and REVEAL Lite 2.0 methods. The safety profile of initial macitentan plus tadalafil combination therapy was consistent with the known profiles of the two drugs, and similar between the subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Initial double combination therapy with macitentan plus tadalafil is efficacious in patients with PAH with 1-2 cardiac comorbidities and those without, with similar safety and tolerability profiles between the two groups.

15.
Gastric Cancer ; 2024 Jul 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38963593

RESUMO

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a crucial component of targeted therapies in gastric cancer, potentially altering traditional treatment paradigms. Many ADCs have entered rigorous clinical trials based on biological theories and preclinical experiments. Modality trials have also been conducted in combination with monoclonal antibody therapies, chemotherapies, immunotherapies, and other treatments to enhance the efficacy of drug coordination effects. However, ADCs exhibit limitations in treating gastric cancer, including resistance triggered by their structure or other factors. Ongoing intensive researches and preclinical experiments are yielding improvements, while enhancements in drug development processes and concomitant diagnostics during the therapeutic period actively boost ADC efficacy. The optimal treatment strategy for gastric cancer patients is continually evolving. This review summarizes the clinical progress of ADCs in treating gastric cancer, analyzes the mechanisms of ADC combination therapies, discusses resistance patterns, and offers a promising outlook for future applications in ADC drug development and companion diagnostics.

17.
J Infect Dis ; 2024 Jul 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38973065

RESUMO

We investigated the mutation profiles of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in samples collected from a molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir combination therapy in macaques. We found that molnupiravir induced several nirmatrelvir resistance mutations at low abundance that were not further selected in combination therapy. Coadministration of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir lowered the magnitude of the mutagenetic effect of molnupiravir.

18.
Cureus ; 16(6): e61766, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38975525

RESUMO

India has a high prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with unique clinical characteristics compared to other populations. Despite advancements in diabetes therapy, a significant number of patients in India still experience poor glycemic control and complications. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors continue to be an important component of T2DM treatment due to their favorable efficacy and tolerability profile. Given the current scenario, there is a need to revisit the role of DPP-4 inhibitors in T2DM management in Indian patients. This consensus paper aims to provide guidance on the utilization of DPP-4 inhibitors in T2DM management from an Indian perspective. A consensus group of 100 experts developed recommendations based on an extensive literature review and discussions. The expert group emphasized the importance of timely glycemic control, combination therapy, and targeting the underlying pathophysiology of T2DM. The combinations of DPP-4 inhibitors with metformin and/or sodium-glucose transport protein-2 inhibitors are rationalized in this paper, considering their complementary mechanisms of action. This paper provides valuable insights for clinicians in optimizing the management of T2DM in the Indian population with the use of DPP-4 inhibitors and proposes an algorithm for selecting DPP-4 inhibitor-based therapies.

19.
Am J Med Sci ; 2024 Jul 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38977245

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with sodium-glucose cotransporter2(SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1(GLP-1) receptor agonists in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: To construct an exhaustive database of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists, a methodical search was undertaken across a range of databases, such as Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from their inception to January 2023. Following this, a meta-analysis was executed to amalgamate the collected data, which allowed for the calculation of standardized mean differences (SMDs), odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for a spectrum of outcomes. This analytical approach was designed to yield a quantitative evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy and safety profile of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists for the treatment of diabetes mellitus. RESULTS: When compared to GLP-1 agonist therapy alone, the combination therapy did not significantly reduce fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.27, 0.10; p=0.35), body weight (95% CI: -0.18, 0.18; p=1.00), Glycosylated Hemoglobin, Type A1C (HbA1c) (95% CI: -0.29, 0.07; p=0.22), or systolic blood pressure (SBP) values (95% CI: -0.29, 0.06; p=0.21). In contrast, when compared to SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy alone, combination therapy significantly decreased FPG by 0.24 mmol/L (95% CI: -0.43, -0.05; p=0.01), HbA1c by 0.45% (95% CI: -0.72, -0.18; p=0.001), and SBP by 0.12 mmHg (95% CI: -0.24, 0.00; p=0.05). However, the combination therapy failed to demonstrate a significant reduction in body weight when compared with either SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy (95% CI: -0.20, 0.05; p=0.24) or GLP-1 agonist therapy (95% CI: -0.18, 0.18; p=1.00). Additionally, the combination therapy did not increase the incidence of hypoglycemia. It should be noted that data regarding mortality and cardiovascular outcomes were limited. CONCLUSIONS: The combination treatment of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists effectively reduces HbA1c, FPG, and SBP without elevating the risk of hypoglycemia when compared to monotherapy with SGLT-2 inhibitors. However, these beneficial effects were not observed when the combination therapy was compared with GLP-1 receptor agonist treatment alone.

20.
Front Oncol ; 14: 1419306, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38978737

RESUMO

Liquid biopsies including pleural fluid or plasma are commonly applied for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and pleural effusion (PE) to guide the treatment. ALK-TKIs are the first options for patients with ALK-positive mutations and combining ALK-TKIs with angiogenic agents may improve survival. We report here one case with ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma in which the patient achieved a prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) of 97 months after undergoing precise pleural effusion NGS and receiving combined bevacizumab treatment following multiple-line ALK-TKI resistance.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...