Evaluating the Commutability of Reference Materials for α-Fetoprotein: Accurate Value Assignment With Multiple Systems and Trueness Verification.

Background: The accurate measurement of α-fetoprotein (AFP) is critical for clinical diagnosis. However, different AFP immunoassays may yield different results. Appropriate AFP reference materials (RMs) were selected and assigned accurate values for applications with external quality assessment (EQA) programs to standardize AFP measurements. Methods: Forty individual clinical samples and six different concentrations of candidate RMs (Can-RMs, L1-L6) were prepared by the Beijing Center for Clinical Laboratories. The Can-RMs were assigned target values by performing five immunoassays, using WHO International Standard 72/225 as a calibrator, and sent to 45 clinical laboratories in Beijing for AFP measurements. The commutability of all RMs was assessed based on CLSI and the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) approaches. Analytical performance was assessed for compliance based on accuracy (total error, TE), trueness (bias), and precision (CV). Results: The Can-RMs were commutable for all immunoassays using the CLSI approach and for 6 of 10 assay combinations using the IFCC approach. RMs diluted in WHO RM 72/225 were commutable among all assays with the CLSI approach, except for serum matrix (Autolumo vs. Roche analyzer) and diluted water matrix (Abbott vs. Roche/Mindray analyzer), whereas some inconclusive and non-commutable results were found using the IFCC approach. The average pass rates based on the TE, bias, and CV were 91%, 81%, and 95%, respectively. Conclusions: The commutability of the RMs differed between both evaluation approaches. The Can-RMs exhibited good commutability with the CLSI approach, suggesting their suitability for use with that approach as commutable EQA materials with assigned values and for monitoring the performance of AFP measurements.

The role of analytical performance specifications in international guidelines and standards dealing with metrological traceability in laboratory medicine.

The goal of metrological traceability is to have equivalent results for a measurand in clinical samples (CSs) irrespective of the in-vitro diagnostic medical device (IVD-MD) used for measurements. The International Standards Organization standard 17511 defines requirements for establishing metrological traceability of values assigned to calibrators, trueness control materials and human samples used with IVD-MDs. Each step in metrological traceability has an uncertainty associated with the value assigned to a material. The uncertainty at each step adds to the uncertainty from preceding steps such that the combined uncertainty gets larger at each step. The combined uncertainty for a CS result must fulfil an analytical performance specification (APS) for the maximum allowable uncertainty (umax CS). The umax CS can be partitioned among the steps in a metrological traceability calibration hierarachy to derive the APS for maximum allowable uncertainty at each step. Similarly, the criterion for maximum acceptable noncommutability bias can be derived from the umax CS. One of the challenges in determining if umax CS is fulfilled is determining the repeatability uncertainty (u Rw) from operating an IVD-MD within a clinical laboratory. Most of the current recommendations for estimating u Rw from internal quality control data do not use a sufficiently representative time interval to capture all relevant sources of variability in measurement results. Consequently, underestimation of u Rw is common and may compromise assessment of how well current IVD-MDs and their supporting calibration hierarchies meet the needs of clinical care providers.

Standardisation and harmonisation of thyroid-stimulating hormone measurements: historical, current, and future perspectives.

Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) is an important clinical marker in the diagnosis and management of thyroid disease. TSH measurements are reported in milli-International Units per Litre (mIU/L), traceable to a World Health Organisation (WHO) reference material. There is a wide variety of commercial immunoassays for TSH measurements available, which have historically been poorly harmonised due to a lack of commutability of the WHO reference materials with patient samples. This led to the recent development of a serum-based reference panel for TSH, traceable to the WHO reference material, available via the International Federation for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC), aimed at harmonisation of TSH immunoassays. This report describes recent developments in the TSH reference system, including establishment of the 4th WHO International Standard for TSH, and aims to clarify the relationship between the available reference materials and their intended uses. This 4th WHO IS is widely available and defines the unit of TSH activity, therefore its continued existence is of paramount importance, however it continues to show a lack of commutability with patient in many TSH immunoassays. This makes the C-STFT TSH panel, albeit available in restricted numbers, a critical resource to ensure better TSH assay harmonisation.

Commutability evaluation of candidate reference materials and ERM-DA470k/IFCC for immunoglobulin M using two international approaches.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the commutability of frozen pooled human serum (PHS), high concentration of Immunoglobulin M (IgM) pure diluted materials (HPDM), commercialized pure materials (CPM), and dilutions of ERM-DA470k/IFCC in IgM detection using the CLSI and IFCC approaches, to support standardization or harmonization of IgM measurement. METHODS: Twenty-four serum samples, relevant reference materials (PHS, HPDM, CPM), and different ERM-DA470k/IFCC dilutions were analyzed in triplicate using six routine methods. The commutability of the relevant reference materials was carried out following CLSI EP30-A and IFCC bias analysis. RESULTS: According to the CLSI approach, low, medium, and high concentrations of PHS, HPDM, and CPM were commutable on 10, 13, 15, 13, and 8 of 15 assay combinations, respectively. Using the IFCC approach, low, medium, and high concentrations of PHS, HPDM, and CPM were commutable on 10, 11, 9, 15, and 10 of 15 assay combinations, respectively. The ERM-DA470k/IFCC dilutions with D-PBS and RPMI-1640 Medium were commutable on 13 of 15 assay combinations according to CLSI and were commutable on all 15 assay combinations using IFCC approach. CONCLUSIONS: High concentration of PHS were commutable on all six detection systems using the CLSI approach. Low and medium concentration of PHS showed unsatisfied commutability. HPDM, not CPM have good commutability, has the potential to become reference materials. ERM-DA470k/IFCC diluted with different medium showed different commutability.

Accurate method for value assignment of carcinoembryonic antigen reference materials.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we explored the commutability of reference materials (RMs) for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), selected the appropriate diluent matrix of the first International Reference Preparation (IRP) 73/601 of the World Health Organization (WHO 73/601) for CEA, and improved the comparability of CEA measurement results among different assay systems. METHODS: Forty serum samples were divided into five aliquots. WHO 73/601 was diluted into nine concentrations using five diluents with different components, and the candidate RMs for CEA at five concentrations (C1-C5) were prepared by the Beijing Clinical Laboratory Center (BCCL). The samples were analyzed via five automated CEA immunoassays. RESULTS: Carcinoembryonic antigen candidate RMs were commutable among all immunoassays based on the CLSI approach and among 7 of 10 assay combinations based on the IFCC approach. WHO 73/601 diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was commutable among all assays based on the CLSI approach and among 5 of 10 pairwise comparisons based on the IFCC approach with correction of bias at diluted concentrations, except for the lowest concentration, which had the smallest variation among systems. The median percentage biases among assays were decreased after calibration. CONCLUSION: The BCCL candidate RMs (C2-C5) for CEA were commutable among all immunoassays. WHO 73/601 RMs diluted in a PBS buffer matrix were selected as common calibrators for five immunoassays, which reduced bias, thereby effectively improving the harmonization of CEA detection; therefore, they could be used to assign values to CEA candidate RMs developed by BCCL. Our findings promote the harmonization of CEA detection in immunoassays.

Deep Sequencing and Molecular Characterisation of BK Virus and JC Virus WHO International Reference Materials for Clinical Diagnostic Use.

BACKGROUND: Reactivation of JC and BK polyomaviruses during immunosuppression can lead to adverse clinical outcomes. In renal transplant recipients, BKV-associated nephropathy can result in graft loss, while in patients with autoimmune disorders, prolonged immunomodulatory drug use can cause rare onset of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy due to JCV reactivation. In such patients, accurate BK and JC viral load determinations by molecular technologies are important for diagnosis and clinical management; however, comparability across centres requires effective standardisation of diagnostic molecular detection systems. In October 2015, the WHO Expert Committee for Biological Standardisation (ECBS) established the 1st WHO International Standards (ISs) for use as primary-order calibrants for BKV and JCV nucleic acid detection. Two multi-centre collaborative studies confirmed their utility in harmonising agreement across the wide range of BKV and JCV assays, respectively. Previous Illumina-based deep sequence analysis of these standards, however, identified deletions in different regions, including the large T-antigen coding region. Hence, further detailed characterization was warranted. METHODS: Comprehensive sequence characterisation of each preparation using short- and long-read next-generation sequencing technologies was performed with additional corroborative independent digital PCR (dPCR) determinations. Potential error rates associated with long-read sequencing were minimised by applying rolling circle amplification (RCA) protocols for viral DNA (circular dsDNA), generating a full validation of sequence identity and composition and delineating the integrity of full-length BK and JC genomes. RESULTS: The analysed genomes displayed subpopulations frequently characterised by complex gene re-arrangements, duplications and deletions. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the recognition of such polymorphisms using high-resolution sequencing methodologies, the ability of these reference materials to act to enhance assay harmonisation did not appear significantly impacted, based on data generated by the 2015 WHO collaborative studies, but highlights cautionary aspects of IS generation and commutability for clinical molecular diagnostic application.

Exploration of suitable external quality assessment materials for serum C-peptide measurement.

OBJECTIVES: To find suitable external quality assessment (EQA) materials for serum C-peptide, we evaluated the commutability of five types of processed materials. METHODS: Seventy-four individual serum samples and 12 processed samples including three EQA samples currently in use, frozen human serum pools (FHSP), and three other kinds of processed samples were prepared by dissolving WHO International Standard Reagent for C-peptide (WHO ISR 13/146) in three different matrixes: 0.05 % bovine serum albumin, fetal bovine serum and human serum pools. Samples were analyzed using the isotope dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC-MS/MS) method and six widely used immunoassays. The commutabilities of processed materials were assessed according to the difference in bias approach recommended by the IFCC. And the short- and long-term stability of FHSP samples at different temperatures were also evaluated. RESULTS: Out of the five kinds of processed materials, FHSP samples were commutable on most assays. In contrast, the EQA materials currently in use were only commutable on a few immunoassays. Additionally, processed materials derived from WHO ISR 13/146 were found to be un-commutable on over half of immunoassays. The FHSP samples could be stably stored at 4 and -20 °C for at least 16 days, and at -80 °C for at least 1 year, but at room temperature only for 12 h. CONCLUSIONS: With clarified commutability and stability information, the human serum pool samples along with the developed ID-LC-MS/MS method could be used in the EQA program to promote the comparability among laboratories for C-peptide measurement in China.

Assessment of WHO 07/202 reference material and human serum pools for commutability and for the potential to reduce variability among soluble transferrin receptor assays.

OBJECTIVES: The clinical use of soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) as an iron status indicator is hindered by a lack of assay standardization and common reference ranges and decision thresholds. In 2009, the WHO and National Institute for Biological Standards and Controls (NIBSC) released a sTfR reference material (RM), 07/202, for assay standardization; however, a comprehensive, formal commutability study was not conducted. METHODS: This study evaluated the commutability of WHO 07/202 sTfR RM and human serum pools and the impacts of their use as common calibrators. Commutability was assessed for six different measurement procedures (MPs). Serum pools were prepared according to updated CLSI C37-A procedures (C37) or non-C37 procedures. The study design and analyses were based on Parts 2 and 3 of the 2018 IFCC Commutability in Metrological Traceability Working Group's Recommendations for Commutability Assessment. WHO 07/202 and serum pools were used for instrument/assay and mathematical recalibration, respectively, to determine if their use decreases inter-assay measurement variability for clinical samples. RESULTS: The WHO 07/202 RM dilutions were commutable for all 6 MPs assessed and, when used for instrument calibration, decreased inter-assay variability from 208 to 55.7 %. Non-C37 and C37 serum pools were commutable for all 6 MPs assessed and decreased inter-assay variability from 208 to 13.8 % and 4.6 %, respectively, when used for mathematical recalibration. CONCLUSIONS: All materials evaluated, when used as common calibrators, substantially decreased inter-assay sTfR measurement variability. MP calibration to non-C37 and C37 serum pools may reduce the sTfR IMPBR to a greater extent than WHO 07/202 RM.

Development of a glucose reference material in human serum for clinical assay standardization.

BACKGROUND: Blood glucose is an important monosaccharide functioning as the main source of energy for the human body. The accurate measurement of blood glucose is crucial for the screening, diagnosis, and monitoring of diabetes and diabetes-associated diseases. To assure the reliability and traceability of blood glucose measurements, we developed a reference material (RM) for use in human serum at two different concentrations, which were certified by the National Institute of Metrology (NIM) as GBW(E)091040 and GBW(E)091043. METHODS: Raw serum samples were collected from residual samples after clinical testing, filtered, and repackaged under mild stirring. The homogeneity and stability of the samples were examined according to ISO Guide 35: 2017. Commutability was evaluated in compliance with CLSI EP30-A. Value assignment was carried out in six certified reference laboratories using the JCTLM-listed reference method for serum glucose. Moreover, the RMs was further applied in a trueness verification program. RESULTS: The developed RMs was homogeneous and commutable enough for clinical use. They were also stable for 24 h at 2-8 â„ƒ or 20-25 â„ƒ and for at least 4 years at - 70 â„ƒ. The certified values were 5.20 ± 0.18 mmol/L and 8.18 ± 0.19 mmol/L (k = 2) for GBW(E)091040 and GBW(E)091043, respectively. The pass rates were evaluated by bias, coefficient of variation (CV), and total error (TE) for 66 clinical laboratories in the trueness verification program were 57.6%, 98.5%, and 89.4% of GBW(E)091040, and 51.5%, 98.5%, and 90.9% of GBW(E)091043, respectively. CONCLUSION: The developed RM could be used for the standardization of reference and clinical systems with satisfactory performance and traceable values, providing strong support for the accurate measurement of blood glucose.

Application of serum pools in insulin harmonization: Commutability and stability.

BACKGROUND: Recalibration using serum pools assigned by higher-order reference methods had been demonstrated to be effective in improving the agreement among insulin immunoassays. To promote the application of serum pools in insulin harmonization, this study analyzed serum pools' commutability between insulin immunoassays, and their short- and long-term stability at different temperatures. The agreement between commonly used immunoassays was also evaluated. METHODS: Insulin in 69 individual serum samples, 10 serum pools, and three EQA samples (lyophilized powder of serum pools) were detected by six widely used immunoassays. The commutability of serum pools and EQA samples was evaluated according to the IFCC-recommended approach. Serum pools' stability at different temperatures was investigated by placing them at various temperatures for varying lengths of time. Individual serum samples' results were analyzed using the Bland-Altman and Passing and Bablok regression analyses. RESULTS: Serum pools were commutable among most assays, the EQA samples-lyophilized serum pools-were non-commutable among most assays. Serum pools can be stably stored at -20°C and -80°C for at least one year, but can only be stably stored at room temperature for twenty-four hours. Significant relative differences were observed among assays. Recalibration using serum pools can only improve the assays' agreement at middle and high insulin levels, but not at low levels. CONCLUSIONS: Serum pools were commutable and stable for insulin measurement and can be used in insulin harmonization. The existing EQA materials were non-commutable between most assays, and other EQA materials, such as serum pools, should be studied.

Assessing the commutability of candidate reference materials for the harmonization of neurofilament light measurements in blood.

OBJECTIVES: Neurofilament light chain (NfL) concentration in blood is a biomarker of neuro-axonal injury in the nervous system and there now exist several assays with high enough sensitivity to measure NfL in serum and plasma. There is a need for harmonization with the goal of creating a certified reference material (CRM) for NfL and an early step in such an effort is to determine the best matrix for the CRM. This is done in a commutability study and here the results of the first one for NfL in blood is presented. METHODS: Forty paired individual serum and plasma samples were analyzed for NfL on four different analytical platforms. Neat and differently spiked serum and plasma were evaluated for their suitability as a CRM using the difference in bias approach. RESULTS: The correlation between the different platforms with regards to measured NfL concentrations were very high (Spearman's ρ≥0.96). Samples spiked with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) showed higher commutability compared to samples spiked with recombinant human NfL protein and serum seems to be a better choice than plasma as the matrix for a CRM. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this first commutability study on NfL in serum/plasma showed that it is feasible to create a CRM for NfL in blood and that spiking should be done using CSF rather than with recombinant human NfL protein.

Commutability assessment of human urine certified reference materials for albumin and creatinine on multiple clinical analyzers using different statistical models.

Urine albumin concentration and albumin-creatinine ratio are important for the screening of early-stage kidney damage. Commutable urine certified reference materials (CRMs) for albumin and creatinine are necessary for standardization of urine albumin and accurate measurement of albumin-urine ratio. Two urine CRMs for albumin and creatinine with certified values determined using higher-order reference measurement procedures were evaluated for their commutability on five brands/models of clinical analyzers where different reagent kits were used, including Roche Cobas c702, Roche Cobas c311, Siemens Atellica CH, Beckman Coulter AU5800, and Abbott Architect c16000. The commutability study was conducted by measuring at least 26 authentic patient urine samples and the human urine CRMs using both reference measurement procedures and the routine methods. Both the linear regression model suggested by the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines and log-transformed model recommended by the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) Commutability Working Group were used to evaluate the commutability of the human urine CRMs. The commutability of the human urine CRMs was found to be generally satisfactory on all five clinical analyzers for both albumin and creatinine, suggesting that they are suitable to be used routinely by clinical laboratories as quality control or for method validation of urine albumin and creatinine measurements.

Development of national secondary reference materials of urea and creatinine in frozen human serum / 中华检验医学杂志

Objective:To develop a national secondary reference material of Urea and Creatinine in frozen human serum as a standard for metrological traceability.Methods:According to JJF1343-2012 "General and Statistical Principles for Characterization of Reference Materials" and JJF 1006-1994 " Technical Norm of Primary Reference Material ", the homogeneity, stability, and commutability were evaluated;Using the JCTLM recommended methods, the value of the reference materials was assigned through collaboration with 6 accredited reference laboratories from Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Beijing Aerospace General Hospital, Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics, Maccura Biotechnology, Beijing Leadman Biochemistry, and Zhejiang MedicalSystem Biotechnology. Uncertainty components including inhomogeneity, stability and value assignment were evaluated.Results:The results of one-way analysis of variance of homogeneity for the reference materials showed P>0.05, and the stability evaluation was less than the critical value of the t-test. The measured values were in the 95% confidence interval in the four conventional detection systems for commutability, and the certified values and expanded uncertainties were urea:(14.7±0.3) mmol/L ( k=2),Cr:(313.9±14.5) μmol/L ( k=2). Conclusion:The prepared secondary reference materials of urea and creatinine had promising homogeneity, stability, and commutable, the values of urea and creatinine concentration in reference materials were accurate and reliable.

A candidate reference method and multiple commutable control materials for serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D measurement.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the current study was to establish a reliable candidate reference method for serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] measurement and to assess the commutability of multiple control materials among liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods. METHODS: Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 [25(OH)D2] and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 [25(OH)D3] together with spiked internal standards were extracted with a one-step approach and then analyzed by LC-MS/MS. The commutability assessment for 25(OH)D was conducted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) EP14-A3 protocol. 25(OH)D concentrations in 5 levels of unprocessed serum pools, 7 levels of serum pools spiked with 25(OH)D3 or 25(OH)D2, 3 levels of commercial control materials, 2 levels of spiked bovine serum, and 4 levels of external quality assessment (EQA) materials were measured along with 30 single-donor samples using the candidate reference method and two routine LC-MS/MS methods. RESULTS: The candidate reference method could separate 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 from 14 potential interfering compounds completely within a 9-min analysis time. Good method precision was obtained, and measurement results on certified reference material NIST SRM 972a were within the uncertainty of the certified values. All candidate materials were assessed commutable for LC-MS/MS methods. CONCLUSIONS: The candidate reference method for serum 25(OH)D measurement is precise, accurate, and robust against interferences and can provide an accuracy base for routine methods. The multiple alternative control materials with commutability among LC-MS/MS methods will facilitate the further standardization for serum 25(OH)D measurement.

Commutability assessment of reference materials for homocysteine.

OBJECTIVES: Commutability of reference materials is essential for ensuring the traceability of patient measurement results and the technical basis for the use of reference materials. Commutability is only relevant for matrixed reference material; it is a prerequisite for the accuracy and authenticity of calibration methods. In this study, we evaluated the commutability of reference materials for homocysteine. METHODS: Five conventional measurement methods were applied to simultaneously measure 30 serum samples and seven homocysteine reference materials from the National Institute of Standards and Technology and the National Institute of Metrology. Liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry was used as a reference method. Two methods were used to evaluate the commutability of the seven reference materials according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute EP30-A and the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) commutability assessment document. RESULTS: Among 35 combinations of the five conventional methods and seven reference materials, after evaluation in accordance with the EP30-A, the seven reference materials passed the commutability assessment, and 34 combinations were commutable. According to the IFCC, the commutability evaluation of 28 combinations was conclusive (commutable or non-commutable), while results for the remaining seven combinations could not be determined. CONCLUSIONS: The homocysteine reference materials showed good commutability. The sensitivity of the measurement procedure, measurement deviation and uncertainty, and differences in the "measurand" selected by different methods may affect the evaluation results. Additionally, different judgment standards for different methods may explain the observed variations in evaluation results.

Matrix Matters: Assessment of Commutability among BK Virus Assays and Standards.

Quantitative testing of BK virus (BKPyV) nucleic acid has become the standard of care in transplant patients. While the relationship between interassay harmonization and commutability has been well characterized for other transplant-related viruses, it has been less well studied for BKPyV, particularly regarding differences in commutability between matrices. Here, interassay agreement was evaluated among six real-time nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) and one digital PCR (dPCR) BKPyV assay. Differences in the commutability of three quantitative standards was examined across all assays using a variety of statistical approaches. Panels, including 40 samples each of plasma and urine samples previously positive for BKPyV, together with one previously negative plasma sample and four previously negative urine samples, were tested using all assays, with each real-time NAAT utilizing its usual quantitative calibrators. Serial dilutions of WHO, National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST), and commercially produced (Exact/Bio-Rad) reference materials were also run by each assay as unknowns. The agreement of the clinical sample values was assessed as a group and in a pairwise manner. The commutability was estimated using both relativistic and quantitative means. The quantitative agreement across assays in the urine samples was within a single log10 unit across all assays, while the results from the plasma samples varied by 2 to 3 log10 IU/mL. The commutability showed a similar disparity between the matrices. Recalibration using international standards diminished the resulting discrepancies in some but not all cases. Differences in the sample matrix can affect the commutability and interassay agreement of quantitative BKPyV assays. Differences in commutability between matrices may largely be due to factors other than those such as amplicon size, previously described as important in the case of cytomegalovirus. Continued efforts to standardize viral load measurements must address multiple sources of variability and account for differences in assay systems, quantitative standards, and sample matrices.

Harmonization Status of Serum Ferritin Measurements and Implications for Use as Marker of Iron-Related Disorders.

BACKGROUND: Serum ferritin is considered a suitable biomarker of iron-related disorders. However, data about the comparability of results among commercial measuring systems (MSs) are contradictory. We performed an intercomparison study aimed at verifying the current interassay variability and its impact on clinical application of the test. Obtaining this information is vital because manufacturers continue to claim calibration alignment to different WHO preparations, which are not related to each other in terms of traceability. METHODS: Four widely used MSs were evaluated. The interassay agreement was verified using 39 human serum pools. The recovery of WHO International Standard (IS) 94/572 (the only reference material available at the time of the study) was evaluated, after assessing the material commutability. Finally, an approach for harmonizing ferritin results was proposed. RESULTS: Highly significant differences (P < 0.00001) among ferritin concentrations assayed by different MSs were detected and the interassay CV (median 22.9%; interquartile range 21.8-25.5) overlapped the desirable intermethod bias (24.6%). IS 94/572 was commutable for use only with Access and Centaur, with Access being the only MS correctly recovering its assigned value. Accordingly, we used regression data against Access to recalibrate MSs, indirectly aligning them to IS 94/572, with a substantial improvement in degree of harmonization and traceability to higher-order reference. CONCLUSIONS: The harmonization among evaluated ferritin MSs is far from optimal, with the implementation of traceability to different WHO ISs being a factor of confusion. A recalibration approach, however, would permit measurement harmonization, allowing the use of common decision thresholds.

How to Really Understand and Improve the System of Internal Quality Control and External Quality Assessment in the Accreditation Process of the Medical Laboratory?

Internal quality control (IQC) regarding process to monitor analytical stability has a long tradition in laboratory medicine. The satisfactory results with different quality specifications of the IQC ensure the acceptability of the examination results. Although the statistical IQC is satisfactory some problems exist, resulting in unreliable patients' results due several reasons (non-commutable control materials, lot to lot difference of reagents, false interpreting test results regarding autovalidation or autoverification, different analytical and clinical specifications or goals etc.). Therefore, the results and findings of IQC have to be connected with external quality assessment (EQA) in order to provide the system of measurement of uncertainty (MU) with correct interpretation of laboratory result and detection relevant and significant shifts and drifts in medical laboratory.

Performance of four regression frameworks with varying precision profiles in simulated reference material commutability assessment.

OBJECTIVES: One approach to assessing reference material (RM) commutability and agreement with clinical samples (CS) is to use ordinary least squares or Deming regression with prediction intervals. This approach assumes constant variance that may not be fulfilled by the measurement procedures. Flexible regression frameworks which relax this assumption, such as quantile regression or generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape (GAMLSS), have recently been implemented, which can model the changing variance with measurand concentration. METHODS: We simulated four imprecision profiles, ranging from simple constant variance to complex mixtures of constant and proportional variance, and examined the effects on commutability assessment outcomes with above four regression frameworks and varying the number of CS, data transformations and RM location relative to CS concentration. Regression framework performance was determined by the proportion of false rejections of commutability from prediction intervals or centiles across relative RM concentrations and was compared with the expected nominal probability coverage. RESULTS: In simple variance profiles (constant or proportional variance), Deming regression, without or with logarithmic transformation respectively, is the most efficient approach. In mixed variance profiles, GAMLSS with smoothing techniques are more appropriate, with consideration given to increasing the number of CS and the relative location of RM. In the case where analytical coefficients of variation profiles are U-shaped, even the more flexible regression frameworks may not be entirely suitable. CONCLUSIONS: In commutability assessments, variance profiles of measurement procedures and location of RM in respect to clinical sample concentration significantly influence the false rejection rate of commutability.