Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 297
Filtrar
1.
Cureus ; 16(5): e61243, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38939304

RESUMO

Background/aims Most countries have gone through lockdowns to varying degrees during the COVID-19 pandemic to reduce the spread of the disease. The successive pandemic waves have impacted the health system, imposing restrictions set by the government. This changed people's daily life routines and they felt more socially isolated, which in turn had an impact on their mental health. Some factors were linked to the severity and outcome of COVID-19 on patients. One of these factors was smoking. This study was carried out to investigate the prevalence and impact of lockdown on smoking habits, as well as the changes in attitudes, behavior, and the rate of consumption before and after the government restrictions in the general population of Saudi Arabia. Materials and methods The present cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of 921 participants from the general population of Saudi Arabia. Data were collected via an online questionnaire. A structured self-response questionnaire was given to the participants after institutional research ethical approval was obtained for the study. Results A total of 921 participants from the smoker population of Saudi Arabia were included in the study. The majority of participants were male (72.9%), and more than half were aged between 18 and 34 years (53.7%). Single individuals had a higher prevalence of increased smoking and a lower rate of quitting compared to married individuals. Participants with higher education levels were more likely to continue smoking at the same rate. While 40.5% of participants reported no change in their smoking rate during the pandemic, 15.4% reported a decrease, 39.0% reported an increase, and 5.1% reported quitting smoking. Participants who reported feeling more stressed during the pandemic had a higher prevalence of increased smoking. The majority of participants believed that smoking increased the risk of COVID-19 infection. Conclusion The study highlights the need for targeted smoking cessation interventions and support services during the pandemic, considering demographic factors, living arrangements, and psychological impact. Efforts should be made to raise awareness about the negative health consequences of smoking during the pandemic and provide resources for stress management and alternative coping strategies. These findings have important implications for public health interventions and policies in Saudi Arabia.

2.
Cureus ; 16(3): e57329, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38690469

RESUMO

This article presents the case of a 57-year-old woman with a history of rheumatoid arthritis who developed severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia that progressed to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and multi-system organ failure. Despite initial slow progression and multiple hospital readmissions, her condition rapidly deteriorated, leading to full respiratory failure requiring intubation and ventilation. She was transferred to a specialized center where she underwent extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and hemodialysis for acute renal failure. Unfortunately, she remained dependent on ECMO for an extended period of six months. Although she made a gradual recovery, the prolonged critical care treatment resulted in critical ischemia of multiple extremities, necessitating a below-knee amputation (BKA) of her left lower extremity and transmetatarsal amputations of her right hand. This case reports one of the longest ECMO treatments for COVID-19 and associated comorbidities in the literature. Clinicians could include a longer duration of treatment and potential associated disabilities in the informed consent.

3.
Life (Basel) ; 14(4)2024 Mar 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38672710

RESUMO

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in an increasing population that is experiencing a wide range of long-lasting symptoms after recovery from the acute infection. Long COVID refers to this specific condition and is associated with diverse symptoms, such as fatigue, myalgias, dyspnea, headache, cognitive impairment, neurodegenerative symptoms, anxiety, depression, and a sense of despair. The potential of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) to improve chronic fatigue, cognitive impairments, and neurological disorders has been established; therefore, the use of HBOT to treat long COVID has also been studied. We conducted a literature search between 1 January 2019 and 30 October 2023, focusing on the clinical efficacy and utility of HBOT for treating long COVID and found ten clinical studies that fit the review topic, including one case report, five one-group pretest-posttest design studies, one safety report from a randomized controlled trial (RCT), and three complete reports of RCTs. Most studies found that HBOT can improve quality of life, fatigue, cognition, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and cardiopulmonary function. Although HBOT has shown some benefits for long COVID symptoms, further rigorous large-scale RCTs are required to establish precise indications, protocols, and post-treatment evaluations.

4.
Int J Cancer ; 155(3): 545-557, 2024 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38561936

RESUMO

Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration in patients with cancer and coronavirus disease (COVID-19) remains controversial. Concerns exist that it may worsen COVID-19 outcomes by triggering an inflammatory cytokine storm, despite its common use for managing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) or febrile neutropenia post-chemotherapy. Here, we determined whether prophylactic or therapeutic G-CSF administration following chemotherapy exacerbates COVID-19 progression to severe/critical conditions in breast cancer patients with COVID-19. Between December 2022 and February 2023, all 503 enrolled breast cancer patients had concurrent COVID-19 and received G-CSF post-chemotherapy, with most being vaccinated pre-chemotherapy. We prospectively observed COVID-19-related adverse outcomes, conducted association analyses, and subsequently performed Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses to validate the causal effect of genetically predicted G-CSF or its associated granulocyte traits on COVID-19 adverse outcomes. Only 0.99% (5/503) of breast cancer patients experienced COVID-19-related hospitalization following prophylactic or therapeutic G-CSF administration after chemotherapy. No mortality or progression to severe/critical COVID-19 occurred after G-CSF administration. Notably, no significant associations were observed between the application, dosage, or response to G-CSF and COVID-19-related hospitalization (all p >.05). Similarly, the MR analyses showed no evidence of causality of genetically predicted G-CSF or related granulocyte traits on COVID-19-related hospitalization or COVID-19 severity (all p >.05). There is insufficient evidence to substantiate the notion that the prophylactic or therapeutic administration of G-CSF after chemotherapy for managing CIN in patients with breast cancer and COVID-19 would worsen COVID-19 outcomes, leading to severe or critical conditions, or even death, especially considering the context of COVID-19 vaccination.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , COVID-19 , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos , Análise da Randomização Mendeliana , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/virologia , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/uso terapêutico , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Idoso , Adulto , Estudos Prospectivos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Estudos de Coortes
5.
Vaccine X ; 18: 100475, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38549951

RESUMO

Background: In early 2021, the Ministry of Public Health of Thailand announced heterologous regimens for COVID-19 vaccines using CoronaVac as the first dose followed by ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 at 3 weeks apart. Priority was given to individuals above 60 years old and those who had seven underlying conditions, including obesity. The vaccine regimen was evaluated for safety and immunogenicity in overweight populations in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Methods: Participants who had a COVID-19 vaccination appointment for the heterologous prime-boost regimen were enrolled. Before each immunization and on day 28 following the second dosage, blood samples were taken, and were examined for anti-spike and neutralizing antibodies by using an indirect ELISA and virus neutralization assays. Safety profile of the vaccine regimen was assessed via a self-recorded diary of adverse events after each vaccination. Results: No serious adverse events related to vaccination were reported during study period and the majority of adverse reactions were fatigue and pain at the injection site. The levels of anti-spike IgG were 26.3, 56.4 and 1752.1 BAU/mL at baseline, 21 days after first dose and 28 days after second dose, respectively. At 4 weeks after complete vaccination, the median inhibition rates of neutralizing antibody determined by surrogate neutralization assay against wild type, Delta and Omicron variants were 95.2, 85.0 and 3.8, respectively. Moreover, the NT50 level against wild type and Delta variants determined by pseudotyped virus neutralization assay were 133.3 and 41.7, respectively. The neutralizing activity against Omicron variant was almost lower than cutoff level for detection. Conclusions: The heterologous CoronaVac-ChAdOx1vaccination was safe, well-tolerated and able to induce humoral immunity against wild-type and Delta variants but not against the Omicron variant in overweight population.

7.
East. Mediterr. health j ; 30(2): 93-102, 2024-02.
Artigo em Inglês | WHO IRIS | ID: who-377342

RESUMO

Background:The Global Health Governance (GHG) response to the COVID-19 pandemic has been criticized, particularly regarding vaccine management, and changes in the roles of GHG actors have been recommended.Aim:To investigate the perception of experts regarding changes in the roles of different GHG actors following the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods:This study used a 3-round Delphi survey to collect data from 30 global health experts between May and December 2022. The GHG roles investigated were stewardship, production of guidelines and policies, promotion of solidarity and collaboration, and management of global health challenges. Social network analysis was performed and collected data was converted into a 1-mode network. Degree centrality and Eigenvector centrality were calculated using the UCINET 6.757 modelling programme.Results:There were variations between the current and future roles in degree centrality and eigenvector centrality for the 19 GHG actors in each of the 4 functions investigated. For stewardship, WHO, governments and the World Bank had the highest degree centrality and eigenvector centrality during both the current and future periods. In terms of production of guidelines and policies, WHO maintained the highest current and future eigenvector centralities, while research agencies, UNICEF and Gavi upheld their current eigenvector centrality measure. For the promotion of solidarity and collaboration, WHO had the highest centrality measures, followed by UNICEF, governments and Gavi. Regarding the function “management of global health challenges”, WHO lost its position to UNICEF as the most central, while UNDP, FHI 360 and research agencies were predicted to have a more central role in the future.Conclusion:The findings position WHO as the current and future top actor in stewardship, production of guidelines and policies, and promoting solidarity and collaboration, and UNICEF as the upcoming most central actor in managing global health challenges. Governments were major actors in all GHG functions except for managing global health challenges. Funding actors were central in all GHG functions, indicating finance as an important factor in obtaining a central role in GHG. Research organizations received a high centrality rating, indicating their importance in GHG


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Saúde Global , Pandemias , Políticas , Surtos de Doenças , Betacoronavirus
8.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 80(3): 445-453, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38212538

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Owing to adverse event following immunization (AEFI) related to autoimmune disorders and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines sharing common biological mechanisms, identifying the risk of AEFIs associated with COVID-19 vaccines remains a critical unmet need. We aimed to assess the potential safety signals for 16 AEFIs and explore co-reported adverse events (AEs) and drugs using the global database of the World Health Organization, VigiBase. METHODS: We assessed the occurrence of 16 AEFIs following COVID-19 vaccination through the Standardized MedDRA Queries group "Immune-mediated/Autoimmune Disorders" from MedDRA and performed a disproportionality analysis using reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information component (IC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: We identified 25,219 events associated with COVID-19 vaccines in VigiBase. Although rare, we detected four potential safety signals related to autoimmune disorders following COVID-19 vaccination, including ankylosing spondylitis or psoriatic arthritis (ROR 1.86; 95% CI 1.53-2.27), inflammatory bowel disease (ROR 1.77; 95% CI 1.60-1.96), polymyalgia rheumatica (ROR 1.42; 95% CI 1.30-1.55), and thyroiditis (ROR 1.40; 95% CI 1.30-1.50), with positive IC025 values. The top co-reported AEs were musculoskeletal disorders, and immunosuppressants were the most representative co-reported drugs. CONCLUSION: In addressing the imperative to comprehend AEFI related to autoimmune disorders following COVID-19 vaccination, our study identified four potential safety signals. Thus, our research underscores the importance of proactive safety monitoring for the identification of the four AEFIs following COVID-19 vaccination, considering the associated advantages.


Assuntos
Doenças Autoimunes , COVID-19 , Humanos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Farmacovigilância , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Doenças Autoimunes/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Autoimunes/epidemiologia , Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos
9.
East. Mediterr. health j ; 30(1): 7-21, 2024-01.
Artigo em Inglês | WHO IRIS | ID: who-377328

RESUMO

Background:Understanding the main determinants of COVID-19 vaccine uptake is critical to increasing vaccine coverage. This is particularly important for COVID-19 vaccine uptake, which has been affected by both demand and supply issues.Aim:To understand the links between vaccine uptake and demand and supply issues in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean and UNICEF Middle East and North Africa regions.Methods:We collected data through 2 rounds of a repeated cross-sectional phone survey from 11 000 individuals across 16 low- and middle-income countries. We used logit modelling to distil the main characteristics of the 4 vaccination categories (vaccinated, unvaccinated but willing, unvaccinated and undecided, and unvaccinated and unwilling) while also considering vaccine availability. We conducted sub-regional analysis to account for differences in level of development between the low- and middle-income countries.Results:Despite the increase in vaccination coverage from 60.9% at the end of 2021 to 78.3% by August 2022, about 9% were not willing and were not vaccinated during the two rounds of interviews. Our modelling analysis revealed that positive beliefs about safety, effectiveness and side effects of the COVID-19 vaccines were associated with increased odds of being vaccinated or willingness to be vaccinated. Those who did not believe in the safety of the vaccines were less likely to be vaccinated than those who believed in the safety of the vaccines (OR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.46–0.67). By contrast, negative beliefs about the COVID-19 vaccines increased the probability of being unwilling to be vaccinated.Conclusion:The results from this research offer useful insights into tackling the supply and demand related barriers to COVID-19 vaccination uptake and provides lessons for future health threats.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Estudos Transversais , Região do Mediterrâneo , Vacinação , Surtos de Doenças , Betacoronavirus
10.
J Nephrol ; 37(1): 53-63, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37930464

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It has been observed that SARS-CoV-2 infections are associated with the development of various de-novo autoimmune diseases; little is known on new-onset antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated glomerulonephritis (ANCA-GN) after SARS-CoV-2 infections. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of previously reported cases with a presumed association of new-onset antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated glomerulonephritis (ANCA-GN). No language restrictions were applied during the search. The eligible articles included reports of biopsy-proven pauci-immune glomerulonephritis that occurred following SARS-CoV-2 infection. The review was registered in PROSPERO database (CRD42023407786). Two further cases are reported. RESULTS: The mean age of SARS-CoV-2 infection-associated ANCA-GN was 48 ± 19 years. Fifty-six percent of patients showed positivity for myeloperoxidase (MPO)-ANCA. Among tested patients, 36% had concomitantly positive antinuclear antibodies, and 100% had positive rheumatoid factor. Eleven out of the 21 cases (55%) were diagnosed with ANCA-GN during hospitalization due to SARS-CoV-2 infection. The remaining cases were diagnosed after a median of 2.1 months following COVID-19. Seventy-one percent of patients showed improvement in kidney function following different treatments. CASE REPORTS: one patient had positive p-ANCA and cryoglobulin. Another case had positive MPO-ANCA, c-ANCA, cryoglobulinemia, and rheumatoid factor. CONCLUSION: SARS-CoV-2 infection-associated ANCA-GN patients are younger than primary ANCA-GN patients. The presence of atypical ANCA along with co-positivity with other autoantibodies can raise suspicion for SARS-CoV-2 infection-associated ANCA-GN.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Glomerulonefrite , Adulto , Idoso , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Anticorpos Anticitoplasma de Neutrófilos , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Glomerulonefrite/diagnóstico , Glomerulonefrite/etiologia , Fator Reumatoide , SARS-CoV-2
11.
Vaccine ; 42(3): 677-688, 2024 Jan 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38114409

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Since the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant became dominant, assessing COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) against severe disease using hospitalization as an outcome became more challenging due to incidental infections via admission screening and variable admission criteria, resulting in a wide range of estimates. To address this, the World Health Organization (WHO) guidance recommends the use of outcomes that are more specific to severe pneumonia such as oxygen use and mechanical ventilation. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted in 24 hospitals in Japan for the Delta-dominant period (August-November 2021; "Delta") and early Omicron (BA.1/BA.2)-dominant period (January-June 2022; "Omicron"). Detailed chart review/interviews were conducted in January-May 2023. VE was measured using various outcomes including disease requiring oxygen therapy, disease requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), death, outcome restricting to "true" severe COVID-19 (where oxygen requirement is due to COVID-19 rather than another condition(s)), and progression from oxygen use to IMV or death among COVID-19 patients. RESULTS: The analysis included 2125 individuals with respiratory failure (1608 cases [75.7%]; 99.2% of vaccinees received mRNA vaccines). During Delta, 2 doses provided high protection for up to 6 months (oxygen requirement: 95.2% [95% CI:88.7-98.0%] [restricted to "true" severe COVID-19: 95.5% {89.3-98.1%}]; IMV: 99.6% [97.3-99.9%]; fatal: 98.6% [92.3-99.7%]). During Omicron, 3 doses provided high protection for up to 6 months (oxygen requirement: 85.5% [68.8-93.3%] ["true" severe COVID-19: 88.1% {73.6-94.7%}]; IMV: 97.9% [85.9-99.7%]; fatal: 99.6% [95.2-99.97]). There was a trend towards higher VE for more severe and specific outcomes. CONCLUSION: Multiple outcomes pointed towards high protection of 2 doses during Delta and 3 doses during Omicron. These results demonstrate the importance of using severe and specific outcomes to accurately measure VE against severe COVID-19, as recommended in WHO guidance in settings of intense transmission as seen during Omicron.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Oxigênio/uso terapêutico , Japão/epidemiologia , Respiração Artificial , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Eficácia de Vacinas , SARS-CoV-2
12.
AlQalam Journal of Medical and Applied Sciences ; 7(2): 213-221, 2024. figures, tables
Artigo em Inglês | AIM (África) | ID: biblio-1552710

RESUMO

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by a novel strain of coronavirus belonging to the genus Beta coronavirus named Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged as a major pandemic worldwide. This contagious virus had spread in many different forms, and patients have demonstrated a wide range of symptoms, ranging from moderate to severe illness. This study aims to highlight the important associations between SARS-CoV-2 infection, vaccination, and possible complications at the Libyan International Medical University, Benghazi. This crosssectional survey was conducted among students and their families at Libyan International Medical University in Benghazi, Libya. Among the 100 participants, 72% were between the ages of 18 and 39. Up to (59%) of participants were men. As for the infection with COVID-19, 77% of participants were infected. Most of the participants had no chronic diseases (69%); however, the most common chronic disease was diabetes mellitus (13%). 82% of participants were vaccinated; the most common types of vaccines administered were Sinopharm and Sputnik V (24%). Following vaccination, 71% of participants had no COVID-19 infection, while 29% did get the infection. Regarding this study, after COVID-19 infection, 66% of participants had no complications; however, 17% had pulmonary complications, which was the most common complication among the participants. As for the complications following the vaccination, 81% of participants had none, while there were pulmonary and neurological complications in 7­6%. The results of the study showed that the most frequent complications noticed among the participants following the COVID-19 infection and vaccination were pulmonary and neurological complications.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Vacinação , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Comorbidade , Diagnóstico , Pandemias
13.
Probl Radiac Med Radiobiol ; 28: 416-423, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês, Ucraniano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38155137

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The victims of the Chornobyl accident, as well as whole population of Ukraine, have become the object of the COVID-19 pandemic in today's conditions. As of 01.01.2020, 108,898 victims had documented permanent disability (persons with disabilities) and, as a rule, suffered from 4-6 types of non-tumor chronic diseases of internal organs, primarily the circulatory system, as well as oncological and endocrine pathology, that significantly affect the course of COVID-19 in a severe scenario and contribute to death. This determines the relevance of the issue of the impact of comorbid pathology in fatal cases due to coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in victims of the Chornobyl accident.The Objective of the study was to study the nature and significance of comorbid pathology in the victims of the Chernobyl accident who died from COVID-19.Design, object and methods of the study - a retrospective non-randomized, comparative comprehensive analysis of the materials of 134 medical expert cases of male clean-up workers of the Chornobyl accident who died from COVID-19 in 2020-2022 during the pandemic was carried out. The analysis of the materials of expert cases included the study of clinically significant and morphologically confirmed pathological processes. The source of the data was the materials of the Central Interdepartmental Expert Commission of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine on the establishment of causal relationship of diseases, disability and death with the action of ionizing radiation and other harmful factors as a result of the Chernobyl accident. RESULTS: In the structure of comorbid pathology in the clean-up workers of the Chornobyl accident who died due to COVID-19 during 2020-2022, diseases of the circulatory system dominate, which occurred in 86.57% of cases of consideration of medical expert cases. AH complicated the course and contributed to the development of fatal consequences in 52.24% of cases, ChIHD - in 34.32% of cases. The consequences of acute vascular events in the form of post-infarction cardiosclerosis in patients with ChIHD contributed to death in COVID-19 in 29 (21.64%) cases.Cerebrovascular pathology represented by cerebral atherosclerosis was detected in 76 (56.72%) cases of death from COVID-19. Acute vascular cerebral events in the cerebral basin (ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes) contributed to fatal outcomes in 19 (14.18%) cases. The presence and course of diabetes mellitus also had a significant impact on the course and fatal mortality of COVID-19 - 24.63% (33 cases). Chronic respiratory diseases (COPD) influenced the course of COVID-19 and contributed to death in 6.72% (9) of cases, nephrological pathology (ChTIN) - in 2.98% (4) of cases, peptic ulcer disease of the duedenum - in 2.24% (3) of cases. More than half of the clean-up workers of the Chornobyl NPP accident who died due to COVID-19 had more than two severe chronic diseases of the comorbid component and their complications. CONCLUSIONS: Сlean-up workers of the Chornobyl accident who died from COVID-19 had another severe comorbid chronic disease, or several diseases that influenced the course of coronavirus disease and each other and contributed to the development of fatal consequences. Death from COVID-19 is much more common in clean-up workers of the Chornobyl accident suffering from severe disabling non-oncological diseases of the cardiovascular system (arterial hypertension, coronary heart disease), cerebrovascular diseases with consequences of acute vascular events, as well as diabetes mellitus. Victims of the Chornobyl catastrophe, especially clean-up workers of the Chornobyl NPP accident, are at special risk for severe coronavirus disease and death from COVID-19.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Acidente Nuclear de Chernobyl , Diabetes Mellitus , Exposição à Radiação , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doses de Radiação , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Doença Crônica , Ucrânia/epidemiologia
14.
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis ; 10(12)2023 Nov 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38132646

RESUMO

The coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 has turned into a pandemic causing a global public health crisis. While acute COVID-19 mainly affects the respiratory system and can cause acute respiratory distress syndrome, an association with persistent inflammatory stress affecting different organ systems has been elucidated in long COVID syndrome (LCS). Increased severity and mortality rates have been reported due to cardiophysiological and metabolic systemic disorders as well as multiorgan failure in COVID-19, additionally accompanied by chronic dyspnea and fatigue in LCS. Hence, novel therapies have been tested to improve the outcomes of LCS of which one potential candidate might be sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. The aim of this narrative review was to discuss rationales for investigating SGLT2 inhibitor therapy in people suffering from LCS. In this regard, we discuss their potential positive effects-next to the well described "cardio-renal-metabolic" conditions-with a focus on potential anti-inflammatory and beneficial systemic effects in LCS. However, potential beneficial as well as potential disadvantageous effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on the prevalence and long-term outcomes of COVID-19 will need to be established in ongoing research.

15.
Euro Surveill ; 28(50)2023 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38099348

RESUMO

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic resulted in adaptation in infection control measures, increased patient transfer, high occupancy of intensive cares, downscaling of non-urgent medical procedures and decreased travelling.AimTo gain insight in the influence of these changes on antimicrobial resistance (AMR) prevalence in the Netherlands, a country with a low AMR prevalence, we estimated changes in demographics and prevalence of six highly resistant microorganisms (HRMO) in hospitalised patients in the Netherlands during COVID-19 waves (March-June 2020, October 2020-June 2021, October 2021-May 2022 and June-August 2022) and interwaves (July-September 2020 and July-September 2021) compared with pre-COVID-19 (March 2019-February 2020).MethodsWe investigated data on routine bacteriology cultures of hospitalised patients, obtained from 37 clinical microbiological laboratories participating in the national AMR surveillance. Demographic characteristics and HRMO prevalence were calculated as proportions and rates per 10,000 hospital admissions.ResultsAlthough no significant persistent changes in HRMO prevalence were detected, some relevant non-significant patterns were recognised in intensive care units. Compared with pre-COVID-19 we found a tendency towards higher prevalence of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus during waves and lower prevalence of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa during interwaves. Additionally, during the first three waves, we observed significantly higher proportions and rates of cultures with Enterococcus faecium (pooled 10% vs 6% and 240 vs 120 per 10,000 admissions) and coagulase-negative Staphylococci (pooled 21% vs 14% and 500 vs 252 per 10,000 admissions) compared with pre-COVID-19.ConclusionWe observed no substantial changes in HRMO prevalence in hospitalised patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Humanos , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Pandemias , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico
16.
East. Mediterr. health j ; 29(11): 877-884, 2023-11.
Artigo em Inglês | WHO IRIS | ID: who-377292

RESUMO

Background:Acceptability of COVID-19 vaccine by healthcare workers (HCWs) can affect its acceptability by the general population.Aim:To assess COVD-19 vaccine acceptability among HCWs in Sana’a, Yemen.Methods:We conducted a multicentre cross-sectional study among 391 HCWs in Sana’a, Yemen, from January to March 2022. We used a self-administered questionnaire to collect data on the demographics, profession, academic qualifications, and experience of HCWs, as well as their COVID-19 vaccine acceptability or hesitancy. We used univariate and multivariable logistic regression to analyse the association between the independent variables and vaccine hesitancy (P < 0.05).Results:Of the 391 HCWs, only 194 (49.6%) were willing to accept the COVID-19 vaccine. The most frequent reasons for vaccine hesitancy were fear of adverse reactions (77.7%), concerns about unknown effects of the vaccine in the future (73.1%), and uncertainty about the safety of new vaccines (69.5%). Female gender and working in the public sector were independent predictors of vaccine hesitancy among the HCWs.Conclusion:Nearly half of the HCWs in Sana’a, Yemen, were willing to accept the COVID-19 vaccine. Female gender and working in the public health sector were independent predictors of vaccine hesitancy. We recommend further studies to compare COVID-19 acceptability among HCWs in the public and private sectors in Yemen.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Estudos Transversais , Pessoal de Saúde , Vacinação , Iêmen
17.
East. Mediterr. health j ; 29(11): 885-893, 2023-11.
Artigo em Inglês | WHO IRIS | ID: who-377291

RESUMO

Background:The COVID-19 pandemic had serious impact on the social, economic, psychological, and physical aspects of a large segment of the society, including women who were married or in stable relationships.Aim:To evaluate changes in the desire to become mothers among married women in Türkiye during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods:This cross-sectional study used data from a self-administered questionnaire that examined the demographics and fertility preferences of 520 married Turkish women. We used the Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) to measure fear, depression and anxiety related to COVID-19. We evaluated fertility preferences before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 11.5.Results:Fifty of 112 study participants who planned to get pregnant halted their plans because of the pandemic. In contrast, 21 of 408 study participants who did not plan a pregnancy decided to get pregnant during the pandemic to enhance their positive disposition and overcome loneliness, and because of the increased leisure time and intimacy with their spouses. Mean scores (standard deviation) for all participants for PHQ-9, GAD-7, and FCV-19S were 7.4 (6.02), 4.93 (4.84), and 17.28 (6.16), respectively.Conclusion:This study highlights the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on women’s fertility preferences in Türkiye due to uncertainty and anxiety. To confirm the results of this study, more research is needed to examine the longer-term impact and among a larger population.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Estudos Transversais , Fertilidade , Pandemias , Gravidez , Turquia
19.
East. Mediterr. health j ; 29(10): 775-782, 2023-10.
Artigo em Inglês | WHO IRIS | ID: who-377281

RESUMO

Background:There are conflicting reports of the interaction between COVID-19 and HIV infection among coinfected individuals, and there is a particular dearth of evidence among populations in the Middle East.Aim:To determine if living with HIV and use of antiretroviral therapy increases susceptibility to, and severity of, COVID-19. Methods:This cross-sectional study was based on telephone survey of COVID-19 symptoms duration and clinical course among 200 people living with HIV (PLWHs) and a review of medical records in Beirut, Lebanon, during Spring 2021. Data were collected from consenting patients using standardized forms. The laboratory and medical characteristics of PLWHs with and without COVID-19 were compared and the outcomes of COVID-19 were described. A binary logistic regression model for contracting COVID-19 was constructed based on clinically relevant covariates consistently associated with COVID-19. Significance level was set at 0.05 and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 27.0. The Lebanese American University Institutional Review Board approved the study protocol. Results:Fifty-two of 200 PLWHs contracted COVID-19 but only 4 progressed to severe COVID-19. No significant differences were found with respect to gender, time since HIV diagnosis, most recent CD4 count, viral load, substance use, comorbidities, or use of antiretroviral therapy. Older PLWHs were at lower risk of contracting COVID-19; COVID-19 infection was significantly associated with younger age. Conclusions:COVID-19 infection was associated with younger age among PLWHs in Lebanon, possibly due to behavioural and socioeconomic factors.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Estudos Transversais , Infecções por HIV , Líbano , Inquéritos e Questionários
20.
East. Mediterr. health j ; 29(10): 783-788, 2023-10.
Artigo em Inglês | WHO IRIS | ID: who-377280

RESUMO

Background:A retrospective review of the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and the challenges faced by hospitals is essential in the post-pandemic era of 2022.Aim:To identify the reasons for prolonged hospitalization after recovery for COVID-19 patients in the United Arab Emirates.Methods:This was a retrospective observational study of 150 (18.75%) patients with prolonged hospitalization in a tertiary hospital in Dubai from 1 April to 1 July 2020. Data was obtained from the electronic medical records of the hospital. Continuous variables are reported as mean and standard deviation, and categorical variables are reported as numbers and percentages.Results:The mean duration of hospitalization was 48.5 (9–272) days, with an interquartile range (IQR) of 22 days. The mean duration of extended stay was 27.5 (2–231) days, with an IQR of 17 days. The common reasons for prolonged hospitalization were mandatory isolation 28% (n = 62), hospital-acquired infections 17% (n = 37), acute respiratory distress syndrome 15% (n = 32), myopathy/neuropathy 14% (n = 31), pulmonary fibrosis requiring oxygen supplementation 14% (n = 31), and completion of COVID-19 treatment 12% (n = 25).Conclusion:To make optimal use of available hospital resources, reasons that directly or indirectly contributed to the prolonged hospitalization of patients should be considered and addressed during future pandemics or disease outbreaks.


Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Hospitalização , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Emirados Árabes Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...