Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cambios rev. méd ; 21(1): 873, 30 Junio 2022. tabs.
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: biblio-1401326

RESUMO

INTRODUCCIÓN. El riesgo ergonómico es la situación adversa que surge de una inadecuada interacción entre el trabajador y su puesto de trabajo. Su identificación es el punto de partida para la corrección y prevención de daños a la salud. OBJETIVO. Describir los riesgos ergonómicos del personal administrativo que realizó teletrabajo. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS. Estudio observacional, descriptivo, retrospectivo, con una población de 66 empleados y una muestra de 25 encuestas a personal administrativo de una empresa importadora de la ciudad de Quito, que realizó teletrabajo desde marzo de 2020. Criterios de inclusión: mayores de 18 años de ambos sexos; que realizaron teletrabajo al menos 60 días. Para el análisis de datos se utilizó el programa Microsoft Excel 2013. RESULTADOS. Se observaron y registraron riesgos ergonómicos en la conformación del puesto de trabajo por mobiliario inadecuado; 20% (5; 25) del personal tuvo una silla ergonómica; 48% (12; 25) un computador tipo PC; 72% (18; 25) utilizó mouse. Se identificó disconfort en zonas corporales, resaltó lumbar 48% (12; 25), codo o antebrazo derecho 36% (9; 25) y cervical 28% (7; 25). CONCLUSIÓN. Se pudo identificar riesgos ergonómicos a los que estuvo expuesto el personal administrativo que realizó teletrabajo.


INTRODUCTION. Ergonomic risk is the adverse situation that arises from an inappropriate interaction between the worker and his job. Their identification is the starting point for the correction and prevention of damage to health. OBJECTIVE. To describe the ergonomic risks of administrative personnel who performed telework. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Observational, descriptive, retrospective study, with a population of 66 employees and a sample of 25 surveys to administrative staff of an importing company in the city of Quito, who performed telework since March 2020. Inclusion criteria: over 18 years of age of both sexes; who teleworked for at least 60 days. For data analysis, the Microsoft Excel 2013 program was used. RESULTS. Ergonomic risks were observed and recorded in the conformation of the workplace due to inadequate furniture; 20% (5; 25) of the staff had an ergonomic chair; 48% (12; 25) a PC type computer; 72% (18; 25) used a mouse. Discomfort was identified in body areas, 48% of the lumbar (12; 25), the right elbow or forearm 36% (9; 25) and the cervical 28% (7; 25). CONCLUSION. It was possible to identify ergonomic risks to which the administrative personnel who performed teleworking were exposed.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Trabalho/tendências , Local de Trabalho , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Teletrabalho , Ergonomia , Doenças Profissionais , Dor , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde , Ferimentos e Lesões , Saúde Ocupacional , Equador , Tendinopatia
2.
Health Res Policy Syst ; 18(1): 136, 2020 Dec 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33339524

RESUMO

Producing evidence in epidemics is crucial to control the current epidemic and prevent its recurrence in the future. Data must be collected and analyzed rapidly to recognize the most efficient and feasible methods with proper timelines. However, there are many challenges a research system may encounter during a crisis. This article has presented lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic for health research system (HRS) to deal with current and future crises. Therefore, a HRS needs to produce and use evidence in such a situation. The components Knowledge Translation Self-Assessment Tool for Research Institutes (SATORI) framework was used to review the actions required and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic in a national HRS. This framework consists of four categories of defining the research question, conducting research, translating the research results, and promoting the use of evidence. The work is proposed actions in response to the COVID-19 crisis and improving a HRS's resilience. While COVID-19 has serious harm to the health and broader socio-economic consequences, this threat should be accounted for as an opportunity to make research systems more accountable and responsible in the timely production and utilization of knowledge. It is time to seriously think about how HRS can build a better back to be resilient to potential shock and prepare for unforeseen emerging conditions.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Política de Saúde , Pandemias , Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Programas Governamentais , Humanos , Conhecimento , Projetos de Pesquisa , SARS-CoV-2
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...