History and evolution of surgical treatment for spasticity: a journey from neurotomy to selective dorsal rhizotomy.

The evolution of neurosurgical approaches to spasticity spans centuries, marked by key milestones and innovative practitioners. Probable ancient descriptions of spasmodic conditions were first classified as spasticity in the 19th century through the interventions of Dr. William John Little on patients with cerebral palsy. The late 19th century witnessed pioneering efforts by surgeons such as Dr. Charles Loomis Dana, who explored neurotomies, and Dr. Charles Sherrington, who proposed dorsal rhizotomy to address spasticity. Dorsal rhizotomy rose to prominence under the expertise of Dr. Otfrid Foerster but saw a decline in the 1920s due to emerging alternative procedures and associated complications. The mid-20th century saw a shift toward myelotomy but the revival of dorsal rhizotomy under Dr. Claude Gros' selective approach and Dr. Marc Sindou's dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) lesioning. In the late 1970s, Dr. Victor Fasano introduced functional dorsal rhizotomy, incorporating electrophysiological evaluations. Dr. Warwick Peacock and Dr. Leila Arens further modified selective dorsal rhizotomy, focusing on approaches at the cauda equina level. Later, baclofen delivered intrathecally via an implanted programmable pump emerged as a promising alternative around the late 1980s, pioneered by Richard Penn and Jeffrey Kroin and then led by A. Leland Albright. Moreover, intraventricular baclofen has also been tried in this matter. The evolution of these neurosurgical interventions highlights the dynamic nature of medical progress, with each era building upon and refining the work of significant individuals, ultimately contributing to successful outcomes in the management of spasticity.

Anatomical damages in the spinal nerve roots and the spinal cord after brachial plexus injury: descriptive study from a cohort of consecutive patients who underwent DREZ-lesioning for pain-practical implications.

BACKGROUND: Systematic descriptions of anatomical damage after brachial plexus injury (BPI) at the intradural level have been scarcely reported in detail. However, considering these damages, not only in the spinal nerve roots but also in the spinal cord itself, is crucial in determining the appropriate surgical approach to restore upper limb function and address refractory pain. Therefore, the authors present a descriptive study focusing on intradural findings observed during microsurgical DREZ-lesioning. METHODS: This study enrolled 19 consecutive patients under the same protocol. Microsurgical observation through exposure of C4 to Th1 medullary segments allowed to describe the lesions in spinal nerve roots, meninges, and spinal cord. Electrical stimulation of the ventral roots checked the muscle responses. RESULTS: Extensive damage was observed among the 114 explored roots (six roots per patient), with only 21 (18.4%) ventral (VR) and 17 (14.9%) dorsal (DR) roots retaining all rootlets intact. Damage distribution varied, with the most frequent impairments in C6 VRs (18 patients) and the least in Th1 VRs (14 patients), while in all the 19 patients for the C6 DRs (the most frequently impaired) and in 14 patients for Th1 DRs (the less impaired). C4 roots were found damaged in 12 patients. Total or partial avulsions affected 63.3% and 69.8% of DRs and VRs, respectively, while 15.8% and 14.0% of the 114 DRs and VRs were atrophic, maintaining muscle responses to stimulation in half of those VRs. Pseudomeningoceles were present in 11 patients but absent in 46% of avulsed roots. Adhesive arachnoiditis was noted in 12 patients, and dorsal horn parenchymal alterations in 10. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of intradural lesions post-BPI helps in guiding surgical indications for repair and functional neurosurgery for pain control.

Trends and insights review. Nerve procedures in the management of upper limb spasticity.

This article reviews the recent advances or nerve-oriented surgical procedures in the treatment of the spastic upper limb. The idea to intervene on the nerve is not recent, but new trends have developed in nerve surgery over the past few years, stimulating experiments and research. Specific surgical procedures involving the nerves have been described at different levels from proximal to distal: at the cervical spinal cord and the dorsal root entry zone (rhizotomy), at the level of the roots (contralateral C7 transfer) or in the peripheral nerve, within the motor trunk (selective neurectomy) or as its branches penetrate the muscles (hyperselective neurectomy). All of these neurosurgical procedures are only effective on spasticity but do not address the other deformities, such as contractures and motor deficit. Additional procedures may have to be planned in conjunction with nerve procedures to optimize outcomes.

Microsurgical DREZotomy for pain related to Pancoast-Tobias syndrome: how I do it?

BACKGROUND: Neuralgic pain related to Pancoast-Tobias syndrome can be difficult to treat. An invasive but effective option for management is open cervical DREZotomy. METHOD: This procedure involves the interruption of the dorsal root entry zone (A delta and C fibers) that sustains the nociceptive pathways. After dura opening, the microsurgical steps are micro incisions of the pia mater under each dorsolateral rootlets and contiguous microcoagulations in the posterolateral sulcus downward to the posterior horn. CONCLUSION: When properly performed in a well-selected patient, DREZotomy is a safe and effective procedure for treating devastating pain related to Pancoast-Tobias syndrome.

Long term results of Dorsal Root Entry Zone (DREZ) lesions for the treatment of intractable pain: A systematic review of the literature on 1242 cases.

BACKGROUND: Different Dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) lesion techniques have been reported as effective treatment for intractable painful conditions, though with contradictory results. Overall, good results were reported especially in specific conditions, such as pain due to brachial plexus avulsion, spinal cord injuries and oncological pain management. However, data on long term results in different clinical conditions are still missing. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to systematically review the pertinent literature to evaluate indications, clinical outcomes, and complications of DREZ lesion (DREZotomy), in chronic pain management. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. Papers on DREZotomy for chronic pain in cancer, brachial plexus avulsion, spinal cord injury, post herpetic neuralgia, and phantom limb pain were considered for eligibility. For each category we further identified two sub-group according to the length of follow up: medium term and long term follow up (more than 3 years) respectively. RESULTS: 46 papers, and 1242 patients, were included in the present investigation. When considering long term results DREZotomy provided favorable clinical outcomes in brachial plexus avulsion and spinal cord injury, in 60.8% and 55.8% of the cases respectively. Conversely, the success rate was 35.3% in phantom limb pain and 28.2% in post herpetic neuralgia. A poor clinical outcome was reported in over than 25% of the patients suffering from phantom limb pain, post herpetic neuralgia and spinal cord injury. The mean complications rate was 23.58%. While BPA and SCI patients presented stable improvement over time, good outcomes among PHN and PLP groups dropped by - 46.2%; and - 14.7% at long term follow up respectively. CONCLUSION: DREZotomy seems to be an effective treatment for chronic pain conditions, especially for brachial plexus avulsion, spinal cord injury and intractable cancer/post-radiation pain. According to the low level of evidence of the pertinent literature, further studies are strongly recommended, to better define potential benefits and limitations of this technique.

Microsurgical DREZotomy in Spastic Cerebral Palsy: Poor Man's Baclofen Pump.

BACKGROUND: Using an intrathecal baclofen (ITB) pump for severe refractory spastic cerebral palsy is not a viable option in resource-constraint settings. Therefore authors assessed the role of microsurgical dorsal root entry zone-otomy (MDT) as an alternative for patients in whom the circumstances did not allow ITB pump placement. METHODS: A prospective clinical study was conducted from August 2016 to July 2020. All patients of spastic cerebral palsy (with III-IV Ashworth grade) who underwent MDT were included. Preoperative and postoperative Ashworth grade and Gross Motor Function Classification System level were assessed along with any change in power, sensation, and bladder functions postoperatively. At last follow-up, the patients' main care providers were asked to rate the effect of surgery (on scale of 0-5) on ease of providing care related to 6 activities of daily living. RESULTS: Seven patients (5 males, 2 females) of spastic cerebral palsy with an age range of 6-21 years underwent MDT over the study period. Six patients had spastic diplegia, and 1 had spastic hemiplegia. Preoperative Ashworth grade in all patients was 3-4 in various involved muscle groups. Four patients with spastic diplegia underwent MDT at L3-S1 level bilaterally, 2 patients with spastic diplegia and spastic bladder underwent MDT at L3-S4 level bilaterally, and 1 patient with right-sided spastic hemiplegia underwent MDT at C5-T1 level and L3-S1 level on the right side. Postoperative Ashworth grade in all patients improved to 0-1. The improvement in mean Ashworth grade was from 3.14 ± 0.378 preoperatively to 0.29 ± 0.488 (P value = 0.000). Most care providers reported improvement in their ability to do physiotherapy, position, clothe, ambulate, and maintain patient's personal hygiene. Care providers of 6 patients reported that they were likely to recommend MDT to another similar patient. CONCLUSIONS: MDT is a cost-effective tool in deceasing limb spasticity in spastic cerebral palsy, especially for those who cannot afford ITB placement.

DREZotomy in the management of post brachial plexus root avulsion neuropathic pain: fMRI correlates for pain relief.

BACKGROUND: Deafferentiation pain following brachial plexus root avulsion has been documented to be severe enough to affect activities of daily living in patients. Microsurgical DREZotomy is known to alleviate the symptoms by decreasing the afferent signals transmitted from the spinal cord to sensory cortex. OBJECTIVES: To document and analyse the effectiveness of DREZotomy and to evaluate the role of 'sensory cortex' in the cause and relief of dysesthetic pain, using fMRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective study conducted between 2010 and 2016 and included all patients who underwent DREZotomy for dysesthetic pain following traumatic brachial plexus injury (TBPI). Patients were evaluated both preoperatively and postoperatively with Visual Analogue Scale(VAS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression score (HADS) and SF36 questionnaire and effectiveness of surgery was assessed. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of the brain in resting state was performed before and after surgery and was also compared with controls. Patients underwent standard microsurgical DREZotomy from C5 to D1. Postoperative assessment was done at 6 weeks and 6 months following surgery. RESULTS: Our series had 18 patients aged between 22 and 63 years. RTA was the most common cause of injury. There was significant decrease in pain at 6 months follow up compared to pre-operative values as assessed by VAS, HADS, SF36 questionnaire. fMRI analysis revealed cluster activations in the sensory, motor cortex and in the right cingulate gyrus in the preoperative group which was higher than in normal controls. In the postoperative group, the size of the resting state activation was significantly reduced. CONCLUSION: DREZotomy is an effective procedure for TBPI patients. We hypothesize that these fMRI findings reflect the cortical reorganization that occurs not only after injury but also following successful surgery which explains the cause and relief of dyesthetic pain.

How to Do It: Microsurgical DREZotomy for Pain After Brachial Plexus Injury: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

More than three-quarters of victims of brachial plexus injury suffer from refractory neuropathic pain.1-6 Main putative mechanism is paroxysmal hyperactivity in the dorsal horn neurons at the dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) as demonstrated by microelectrode recordings in animal models7 and patients.8 Pain relief can be achieved by lesioning the responsible neurons in the spinal cord segments with avulsed rootlets.9,10 This video illustrates the technique for microsurgical DREZotomy.11,12 A C3-C7 hemilaminectomy is performed to access the C4-Th1 medullary segments. After opening the dura and arachnoid, and freeing the cord from arachnoid adhesions, the dorsolateral sulcus is identified. Identification can be difficult when the spinal cord is distorted and/or has a loss of substance. The dorsolateral sulcus is then opened with a microknife, so that microcoagulations are performed: 4 mm deep, at 35° angle in the axis of the dorsal horn, every millimeter in a dotted fashion along the avulsed segments. Care should be taken not to damage the corticospinal tract, laterally, and the dorsal column, medially. The patient consents to the procedure. In the presented case, surgery led to complete disappearance of the paroxysmal pain and reduced the background of burning pain to a bearable level without the need of opioid medication. There was no motor deficit or ataxia in the ipsilateral lower limb postoperatively. According to Kaplan-Meier analysis at 10 yr follow-up, in our overall series, microsurgical DREZotomy achieved total pain relief without any medication in 60% of patients, and in 85% without the need for opioids.10,13-15 Microelectrode recording at 1:26 reproduced from Guenot et al7 with permission from JNSPG.

Dorsal Root Entry Zone Lesioning for Brachial Plexus Avulsion Injuries: Case Series and Literature Review.

Introduction: Brachial plexus avulsion (BPA) injuries commonly occur secondary to motor vehicle collisions, usually in the young adult population. These injuries are associated with significant morbidity, and up to 90% of patients suffer from deafferentation pain. Neuromodulation procedures can be efficacious in the treatment of refractory neuropathic pain, although the treatment of pain due to BPA can be challenging. Dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) lesioning is a classical and effective neurosurgical technique which has become underutilized in treating refractory root avulsion pain. Methods: A systematic review of the different technical nuances, procedural efficacy, and complication profiles regarding DREZ lesioning for BPA injuries in the literature is included. We also present an institutional case series of 7 patients with BPA injuries who underwent DREZ lesioning. Results: In the literature, 692 patients were identified to have undergone DREZ lesioning for pain related to BPA. In 567 patients, the surgery was successful in reducing pain intensity by over 50% in comparison to baseline (81.9%). Complications included transient motor deficits (11%) and transient sensory deficits (11%). Other complications including permanent disability, cardiovascular complications, infections, or death were rare (<1.9%). In our case series, all but one patient achieved >50% reduction in pain intensity, with the mean pre-operative pain of 7.9 ± 0.63 (visual analog scale) reduced to 2.1 ± 0.99 at last follow-up (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Both the literature and the current case series demonstrate excellent pain severity reduction following DREZ ablation for deafferentation pain secondary to BPA.

Surgical approaches and long-term outcomes of intramedullary spinal cord cavernous malformations: a single-center consecutive series of 219 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Optimal surgical strategies for intramedullary spinal cord cavernous malformations (ISCCMs) are not optimized and remain problematic. In this study the authors identify rational surgical strategies for ISCCMs and predictors of outcomes after resection. METHODS: A single-center study was performed with 219 consecutive surgically treated patients who presented from 2002 to 2017 and were analyzed retrospectively. The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale was used to evaluate neurological functions. Patient characteristics, surgical approaches, and immediate and long-term postoperative outcomes were identified. RESULTS: The average ISCCM size was 10.5 mm. The spinal level affected was cervical in 24.8% of patients, thoracic in 73.4%, and lumbar in 1.8%. The locations of the lesions in the horizontal plane were 30.4% ventral, 41.6% dorsal, and 28.0% central. Of the 214 patients included in the cohort for operative evaluation, 62.6% had superficially located lesions, while 37.4% were embedded. Gross-total resection was achieved in 98.1% of patients. The immediate postoperative neurological condition worsened in 10.3% of the patients. Multivariate logistic regression identified mild preoperative function (p = 0.014, odds ratio [OR] 4.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-14.8) and thoracolumbar-level lesions (p = 0.01, OR 15.7, 95% CI 1.9-130.2) as independent predictors of worsening. The mean follow-up duration in 187 patients was 45.9 months. Of these patients, 63.1% were stable, 33.2% improved, and 3.7% worsened. Favorable outcomes were observed in 86.1% of patients during long-term follow-up and were significantly associated with preoperative mild neurological and disability status (p = 0.000) and cervically located lesions (p = 0.009). The depths of the lesions were associated with worse long-term outcomes (p = 0.001), and performing myelotomy directly through a yellowish abnormal surface in moderate-depth lesions was an independent predictor of worsening (p = 0.023, OR 35.3, 95% CI 1.6-756.3). CONCLUSIONS: Resection performed with an individualized surgical approach remains the primary therapeutic option in ISCCMs. Performing surgery in patients with mild symptoms at the thoracolumbar level and embedded located lesions requires more discretion.

Efficacy and factors determining the outcome of dorsal root entry zone lesioning procedure (DREZotomy) in the treatment of intractable pain syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is a disabling condition that adversely affects patient quality of life. The dorsal root entry zone lesioning procedure (DREZotomy) is a modality used to treat intractable pain caused by insults to neural structures. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of and the factors that determine the outcome of microsurgical DREZotomy (MDT). METHOD: All consecutive patients who underwent MDT for treatment of intractable pain during September 2008 to December 2016 were enrolled. Demographic data, clinical characteristics, intraoperative findings, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: The 40 included patients underwent MDT for relief of intractable pain caused by 27 brachial plexus injuries (BPIs), 6 spinal cord injuries, 3 neoplasms, and 4 other causes. A significant reduction in pain was observed post-MDT for both average (p < 0.001) and maximal pain (p < 0.001). Favorable outcome (≥50% pain reduction) was observed in 67.5% of patients, with the best outcome in BPI-related pain. In multivariate analysis, injury of the spinal nerve root (root avulsion or injury) was significantly associated with good average pain relief (OR, 5.8; 95% CI, 1.2-27.5; p = 0.026) and pain freedom (OR, 5.0; 95% CI, 1.12-22.30; p = 0.035). Electrical pain (OR, 6.49; 95% CI, 1.20-35.19; p = 0.030) and lower number of painful dermatomes (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.01-1.67; p = 0.039) were significantly associated with good maximal pain relief. CONCLUSIONS: MDT is an effective procedure for treatment of intractable pain in well-selected patients, particularly in cases with brachial plexus avulsion pain. Injury of the spinal nerve root (brachial plexus avulsion and cauda equina injury) was associated with good average pain relief and pain freedom, and electrical pain and lower number of painful dermatomes were associated with good maximal pain relief. The results are useful in the selection of candidates for DREZotomy and prediction of surgical outcome.

Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring (Motor and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials) in Dorsal Root Entry Zone Lesioning for Brachial Plexus Avulsion Pain.

AIMS: To address the feasibility and importance of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) in dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) lesioning for brachial plexus avulsion pain. METHODS: Muscle motor evoked potential (mMEP) and somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) were applied during DREZ lesioning for brachial plexus avulsion pain. RESULTS: IONM of mMEPs and SSEPs was feasible for monitoring of the spinal cord during DREZ lesioning. With the exception of 3 unrecordable mMEPs in ipsilateral arms, mMEPs were preserved and referenced to look for changes according to lesioning in 6 upper extremities (66.6%) and 8 lower extremities. All 3 patients with >50% reduction in baseline mMEP amplitude after lesioning in either the ipsilateral upper or lower extremities showed postoperative ataxia and weakness of the lower extremities (100%). Only 2 out of 9 patients (22.2%) with brachial plexus avulsion pain had discernible baseline SSEPs in the ipsilateral upper extremities. One of 2 patients with discernible SSEPs in the upper extremities showed significant SSEP events during the DREZ lesioning and experienced postoperative ataxia and weakness in the legs despite the absence of a SSEP event in the lower extremities. CONCLUSION: Significant events on IONM were common during DREZ lesioning for brachial plexus avulsion pain and were closely related to the occurrence of postoperative neurological deficits.

Correlation of preoperative MRI with the long-term outcomes of dorsal root entry zone lesioning for brachial plexus avulsion pain.

OBJECT Lesioning of the dorsal root entry zone (DREZotomy) is an effective treatment for brachial plexus avulsion (BPA) pain. The role of preoperative assessment with MRI has been shown to be unreliable for determining affected levels; however, it may have a role in predicting pain outcomes. Here, DREZotomy outcomes are reviewed and preoperative MRI is examined as a possible prognostic factor. METHODS A retrospective review was performed of an institutional database of patients who had undergone brachial plexus DREZ procedures since 1995. Preoperative MRI was examined to assess damage to the DREZ or dorsal horn, as evidenced by avulsion of the DREZ or T2 hyperintensity within the spinal cord. Phone interviews were conducted to assess the long-term pain outcomes. RESULTS Between 1995 and 2012, 27 patients were found to have undergone cervical DREZ procedures for BPA. Of these, 15 had preoperative MR images of the cervical spine available for review. The outcomes were graded from 1 to 4 as poor (no significant relief), good (more than 50% pain relief), excellent (more than 75% pain relief), or pain free, respectively. Overall, DREZotomy was found to be a safe, efficacious, and durable procedure for relief of pain due to BPA. The initial success rate was 73%, which declined to 66% at a median follow-up time of 62.5 months. Damage to the DREZ or dorsal horn was significantly correlated with poorer outcomes (p = 0.02). The average outcomes in patients without MRI evidence of DREZ or dorsal horn damage was significantly higher than in patients with such damage (3.67 vs 1.75, t-test; p = 0.001). A longer duration of pain prior to operation was also a significant predictor of treatment success (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS Overall, the DREZotomy procedure has a 66% chance of achieving meaningful pain relief on long-term follow-up. Successful pain relief is associated with the lack of damage to the DREZ and dorsal horn on preoperative MRI.

Invasive treatment to control neuropathic pain / Tratamento invasivo para o controle da dor neuropática

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Distress, allied to neuropathic pain persistence and its refractory nature, often leads patients to accept invasive procedures. Neuropathic pain control is a major medical challenge requiring approaches and decisions especially based on effectiveness, risks and costs. This study aimed at reviewing these aspects related to major invasive procedures. CONTENTS: Major invasive procedures to control neuropathic pain are presented. Initially, classically reversible anesthetic blocks; then invasive neuromodulation techniques using electric current application and the magnetic field generated by it becomes a target to be stimulated, inhibited or modified in the nervous system (central, peripheral or autonomic); and, finally, ablative procedures including anesthetic methods administering neurolytic agents rather than anesthetics and neurosurgeries using different methods to injure the nervous system to control painful neuropathic discomfort. CONCLUSION: Patients eligible to invasive procedures to control neuropathic pain have, in addition to pain itself, a mixed distress including the collection of repeated delusions at every treatment failure. They have reserved prognosis with regard to total cure and, unfortunately, relieve obtained with invasive treatment in general does not reach persistent and high rates. In such adverse situation, these partial results of decreasing original pain intensity may be interpreted as acceptable, provided the impact on final quality of life is positive. Maybe, the rare exceptions are good results obtained with typical idiopathic/cryptogenic neuralgias ironically excluded from the stricter interpretation of the new pathophysiologic classification of neuropathic pains.

RESUMO JUSTFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: O sofrimento aliado à persistência e refratariedade da dor neuropática frequentemente leva seu portador a aceitar tratamentos invasivos. O controle da dor neuropática representa um desafio médico importante necessitando adoção de condutas e decisões baseadas, principalmente, em efetividade, riscos e custos. O escopo deste estudo foi a revisão desses aspectos relacionados aos principais procedimentos invasivos CONTEÚDO: São apresentados os principais procedimentos invasivos utilizados para o controle da dor neuropática. Inicialmente, os bloqueios anestésicos, classicamente reversíveis; depois as técnicas de neuromodulação invasiva que utilizam a aplicação de corrente elétrica e o campo magnético por ela gerado em alvos a serem estimulados, inibidos ou modificados, no sistema nervoso (central, periférico ou autônomo); e, finalmente, os procedimentos ablativos que incluem os métodos anestésicos que administram agentes neurolíticos ao invés de anestésicos, e, as neurocirurgias que utilizam métodos diversos de produção de lesões no sistema nervoso para o controle do desconforto doloroso neuropático. CONCLUSÃO: Os pacientes que se apresentam como candidatos a receberem indicações de procedimentos invasivos para controle de dores neuropáticas, possuem além do inerente à própria dor, sofrimento misto, que inclui a coleção de desilusões reiteradas a cada insucesso de tratamento. Possuem prognóstico reservado no que tange a plena cura, e, infelizmente, o alívio obtido com o tratamento invasivo, em geral, não atinge taxas persistentes e elevadas. Nessa situação tão adversa esses resultados parciais de redução da intensidade da dor original possam ser interpretados como aceitáveis desde que o impacto na qualidade de vida final seja positivo. Talvez, as raras exceções, recaiam sobre os bons resultados obtidos com as neuralgias típicas, idiopáticas/criptogenéticas, ironicamente, excluídas da interpretação mais rígida da nova classificação fisiopatológica das dores neuropáticas.

[Neurosurgical treatment of chronic pain]. / Traitement neurochirurgical de la douleur chronique.

Neurosurgical treatment of pain used two kind of techniques: 1) Lesional techniques interrupt the transmission of nociceptive neural input by lesionning the nociceptive pathways (drezotomy, cordotomy, tractotomy…). They are indicated to treat morphine-resistant cancer pain and few cases of selected neuropathic pain. 2) Neuromodulation techniques try to decrease pain by reinforcing inhibitory and/or to limit activatory mechanisms. Chronic electrical stimulation of the nervous system (peripheral nerve stimulation, spinal cord stimulation, motor cortex stimulation…) is used to treat chronic neuropathic pain. Intrathecal infusion of analgesics (morphine, ziconotide…), using implantable pumps, allows to increase their efficacy and to reduce their side effects. These techniques can improve, sometimes dramatically, selected patients with severe and chronic pain, refractory to all other treatments. The quality of the analgesic outcome depends on the relevance of the indications.

Microsurgical DREZotomy for treatment of intractable central pain in patient with spinal cord injury / 영남의대학술지

The central pain in patient with spinal cord injury is a common and disabling sequelae. The microsurgical DREZ(Dorsal Root Entry Zone)otomy is a surgical procedure effective in the treatment of intractable pain and spasticity in spinal cord injured patients. It consists of a microsurgical lesions performed in the ventrolateral region of the dorsal root entry zone at the selected levels. This report presents one case with incomplete paraplegia patient, who had chronic central neuropathic pain ineffective to many conservative treatments in bilateral T10 and right T11 segments and both lower extremities, is relieved from the pain after microsurgical DREZotomy. In conclusion, microsurgical DREZotomy is one method of effective treatments for spinal cord injured patients with intractable central neuropathic pain.

Microsurgical DREZotomy for treatment of intractable central pain in patient with spinal cord injury / 영남의대학술지

The central pain in patient with spinal cord injury is a common and disabling sequelae. The microsurgical DREZ(Dorsal Root Entry Zone)otomy is a surgical procedure effective in the treatment of intractable pain and spasticity in spinal cord injured patients. It consists of a microsurgical lesions performed in the ventrolateral region of the dorsal root entry zone at the selected levels. This report presents one case with incomplete paraplegia patient, who had chronic central neuropathic pain ineffective to many conservative treatments in bilateral T10 and right T11 segments and both lower extremities, is relieved from the pain after microsurgical DREZotomy. In conclusion, microsurgical DREZotomy is one method of effective treatments for spinal cord injured patients with intractable central neuropathic pain.

The Efficacy of Doral Root Entry Zone(DREZ) Lesions Making for Intractable Pain and DREZ-otomy for Inractable Spasticity

The dorsal root entry zone(DREZ) lesions making by focal destruction of the substantia gelatinosa controls intractable pain, and the DREZ-otomy by the selective destroying mainly the laterally located nociceptive and centrally located myotactic afferent fibers within the posterior root relieves the spasticity of the limbs. The authors analysed the results of 12 patients, treated by the DREZ lesions making for intractable pain, and 6 patients, treated by the DREZ-otomy for intractable spasticity of lower extremities, who were admitted to department of neurosurgery of Soonchunhyung University from 1983 to 1993. The obtained results were as follows. 1) Among the 12 patients suffered from intractable pain, three were brachial plexus avulsion, three were spinal cord injury, two were causalgia, and the others were paraneoplastic syndrome, metastatic carcinoma, postoperative spinal cord tumor, and atypical facial pain respectively. There were six patients intractable spasticity of that major cause was diffuse axonal injury(67%), and of that major posture was decorticate rigidity(83%). 2) The rate of immediate relief of intractable pain and spasticity was 82% in each after DREZ lesions making or DREZ-otomy. 3) The result of pain relief by the DREZ lesions making was excellent(100%) in brachial plexus avulsion, and poor(almost no relief) in paraplegic pain of spinal cord injury. 4) After DREZ-otomy on bilateral conus medullaris sparing S(2-4) segment, the degree of spasticity of lower extremitries reduced gradually to mean Ashworth scale 2.1 from mean 5. 5) Five of six patients of the bedridden state due to harmful spasticity was able to do comfortably wheel chair ambulation immediately after operation.