Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
1.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 13(6)2023 Mar 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36980445

RESUMO

Dengue is a serious mosquito-transmitted disease caused by the dengue virus (DENV). Rapid and reliable diagnosis of DENV infection is urgently needed in dengue-endemic regions. We describe here the performance evaluation of the CE-marked VIDAS® dengue immunoassays developed for the automated detection of DENV NS1 antigen and anti-DENV IgM and IgG antibodies. A multicenter concordance study was conducted in 1296 patients from dengue-endemic regions in Asia, Latin America, and Africa. VIDAS® dengue results were compared to those of competitor enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). The VIDAS® dengue assays showed high precision (CV ≤ 10.7%) and limited cross-reactivity (≤15.4%) with other infections. VIDAS® DENGUE NS1 Ag showed high positive and negative percent agreement (92.8% PPA and 91.7% NPA) in acute patients within 0-5 days of symptom onset. VIDAS® Anti-DENGUE IgM and IgG showed a moderate-to-high concordance with ELISA (74.8% to 90.6%) in post-acute and recovery patients. PPA was further improved in combined VIDAS® NS1/IgM (96.4% in 0-5 days acute patients) and IgM/IgG (91.9% in post-acute patients) tests. Altogether, the VIDAS® dengue NS1, IgM, and IgG assays performed well, either alone or in combination, and should be suitable for the accurate diagnosis of DENV infection in dengue-endemic regions.

2.
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg ; 114(8): 603-611, 2020 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32497201

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the validity of clinical diagnosis compared with laboratory diagnosis of dengue in a retrospective sample of patients in São José do Rio Preto, Brazil. METHODS: Our sample included 148 299 clinically (56.3%) or laboratory-diagnosed (43.7%) dengue cases. We compared the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) of dengue patients' demographic and clinical characteristics with laboratory-based diagnosis. We used logistic regressions to estimate the correlation between clinical and laboratory diagnosis of dengue and a full set of dengue signs and symptoms. RESULTS: We found substantial variability in sensitivity and specificity of signs and symptoms ranging from 0.8-81.1 and 21.5-99.6, respectively. Thrombocytopenia exhibited the highest PPV (92.0) and lowest NPV (42.2) and was the only symptom showing agreement with laboratory-confirmed dengue (φ = 0.38). The presence of exanthema and thrombocytopenia led to a greater likelihood of concordant clinical and laboratory diagnoses (exanthema: OR: 4.23; 95% CI: 2.09 to 8.57; thrombocytopenia: OR: 4.02; 95% CI: 1.32 to 12.27). CONCLUSIONS: We found substantial variation in sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of dengue signs and symptoms. For accuracy, clinical and laboratory diagnosis of dengue should be performed concurrently. When laboratory tests are not available, we suggest focusing on the clinical manifestations most associated with dengue.


Assuntos
Dengue , Brasil/epidemiologia , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico , Dengue/diagnóstico , Dengue/epidemiologia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
3.
Infectio ; 23(3): 259-265, jul.-sept. 2019. tab, graf
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS, COLNAL | ID: biblio-1002160

RESUMO

Objetivo: Se considera que el diagnóstico del dengue es fundamentalmente clínico; sin embargo, las pruebas rápidas basadas en la detección de IgM o NS1/IgM están siendo utilizadas en los servicios de salud. Este estudio determinó la contribución de las pruebas rápidas al diagnóstico de dengue en un área endémica antes de la introducción del virus zika. Metodología: Diseño de corte transversal de pruebas diagnósticas realizado a partir del análisis secundario de un estudio previo en 14 instituciones de salud del Valle del Cauca. Se obtuvo información de 632 participantes con resultados de prueba rápida, diagnóstico clínico y pruebas de referencia ELISA NS1, ELISA IgM y RT-PCR. Se compararon la sensibilidad, especificidad, valores predictivos y razones de verosimilitud del uso solo, en serie, y paralelo de los componentes NS1, IgM, NS1/IgM de la prueba rápida y el diagnóstico clínico con las pruebas Q de Cochran y McNemar para datos pareados. Resultados: La sensibilidad del diagnóstico clínico (61,4% IC95% 56%-66,7%) fue superior a la de las pruebas rápidas (37% IC95% 29,6%-44,7%) (P Conclusión: El diagnóstico clínico tiene una mayor sensibilidad que las pruebas rápidas, pero por si solo no es suficiente para confirmar o descartar dengue. Un resultado positivo en pruebas rápidas en pacientes con diagnóstico clínico de dengue es útil para confirmarlo, pero un resultado negativo no lo descarta.


Objective: Dengue diagnosis is considered to be mainly clinical; however, rapid tests that detect IgM or NS1/IgM are being used in health services. This study assessed the contribution of rapid tests to dengue diagnosis in an endemic area before the emergence of zika virus in Colombia. Methods: Cross-sectional study of diagnostic tests based on a secondary analysis of a previous study in 14 health care institutions in Valle del Cauca department. Results of dengue rapid test, clinical diagnosis, and reference tests ELISA NS1, ELISA IgM, and RT-PCR were obtained for 632 participants. The sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios of the use alone, serial and parallel combinations of NS1, IgM, NS1/IgM of the rapid test and clinical diagnosis were compared using Cochran´s Q and MacNemar tests for paired data. Results: The sensitivity of clinical diagnosis (61.4% 95%IC 56-66.7) was higher than the sensitivity of rapid tests (37% 95% IC 29.6-44.7) (P<0.001). The serial used of NS1/IgM rapid test when clinical diagnosis was negative increased the sensitivity to 79.5% and, the serial use when clinical diagnosis was positive increased the specificity (from 66.3% to 98.7%). However, the latter decreased the sensitivity to 32.2%. While all negative likelihood ratios (LR-) were close to 1, the serial use of rapid tests when clinical diagnosis was positive had LR+ higher than 10. Conclusion: The clinical diagnosis is more sensitive than rapid tests, but by itself does not confirm or rule out dengue. A positive result in rapid tests is useful to confirm dengue but a negative result does not rule it out.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Dengue , Dengue/diagnóstico , Zika virus , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Proteínas não Estruturais Virais/análise , Colômbia , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico , Testes Imediatos
4.
Biomedica ; 39(1): 170-185, 2019 03 31.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31021556

RESUMO

Introduction: Due to the increase in dengue incidence and mortality, its diagnosis is relevant for endemic countries. Clinical classifications and laboratory tests have a variable performance in clinical practice with a sensitivity level between 45% and 98%, and a specificity level between 4% and 98% partly due to the variety of contexts where they are applied. Objective: To develop clinical algorithms for the diagnosis of dengue in the Colombian context. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted based on secondary sources. We constructed clinical diagnostic algorithms of dengue based on Bayesian methods combining symptoms, signs, and blood count parameters, and then we compared them in terms of diagnostic accuracy with gold standard tests. In addition, an external validation of the algorithm with greater accuracy and sensibility was performed comparing it with the WHO-1997 and the WHO-2009 clinical classifications, the Colombian guide for 2010, and the diagnostic scale recommended by the Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social of Colombia for 2013. Results: Four algorithms were generated, two for signs and symptoms, and two that included leukocytes (≤4,500/mm3) and/or platelets (≤160,000/mm3) counts. The most accurate algorithm included blood count parameters with a sensitivity of 76.5% (95%CI: 71.9-80.5) and a specificity of 46.0% (95%CI: 37.6-54.7). In the external validation we found a sensitivity of 11.1% (95%CI: 4.9-20.7) and a specificity of 91.9% (95%CI: 87.5-93.9). The scale of the Ministerio de Salud had a sensitivity of 76.4% (95%CI: 64.9-85.6) and a specificity of 38.0% (95%CI: 32.8-43.4). Conclusion: The inclusion of blood count parameters improved the sensitivity of diagnostics algorithms based on signs and symptoms. Clinical diagnosis of dengue remains a challenge for health research.


Introducción. Dado el aumento de la incidencia y la mortalidad por dengue, su diagnóstico es relevante para los países endémicos. Las clasificaciones clínicas y las pruebas de laboratorio existentes tienen un desempeño variable en la práctica clínica, pues su sensibilidad fluctúa entre 45 y 98 %, y su especificidad, entre 4 y 98 %, lo cual se debe, en parte, a la diversidad de contextos en los que se utilizan. Objetivo. Desarrollar algoritmos clínicos para el diagnóstico del dengue en el contexto colombiano. Materiales y métodos. Se hizo un estudio transversal a partir de fuentes secundarias. Se construyeron algoritmos clínicos de diagnóstico del dengue con base en métodos bayesianos que combinaron síntomas, signos y parámetros del hemograma, y se comparó su exactitud diagnóstica con la de las pruebas de referencia. Se hizo una validación externa del algoritmo de mayor exactitud y sensibilidad, comparándolo con la clasificación clínica de la Organización Mundial de la Salud de 1997 y la del 2009, con la guía colombiana del 2010 y con la escala diagnóstica propuesta por el Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social de Colombia en el 2013. Resultados. Se generaron cuatro algoritmos, dos de signos y síntomas y dos que incluyeron el conteo de leucocitos (≤4.500/mm3) o de plaquetas (≤60.000/mm3). El algoritmo de mayor exactitud incluyó los parámetros del hemograma, con una sensibilidad de 76,5 % (IC95% 71,9-80,5) y una especificidad de 46,0 % (IC95% 37,6-54,7). En la validación externa, la sensibilidad fue de 11,1 % (IC95% 4,9-20,7) y la especificidad fue de 91,9 % (IC95% 87,5-93,9). La escala del Ministerio tuvo una sensibilidad de 76,4 % (IC95% 64,9-85,6) y una especificidad de 38,0 % (IC95% 32,8-43,4). Conclusión. La inclusión de los parámetros del hemograma mejoró la sensibilidad de los algoritmos de diagnóstico basados en los signos y los síntomas. Sin embargo, el diagnóstico clínico del dengue sigue siendo un reto para la investigación en salud.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Dengue/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Teorema de Bayes , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Colômbia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Adulto Jovem
5.
Biomédica (Bogotá) ; Biomédica (Bogotá);39(1): 170-185, ene.-mar. 2019. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: biblio-1001398

RESUMO

Resumen Introducción. Dado el aumento de la incidencia y la mortalidad por dengue, su diagnóstico es relevante para los países endémicos. Las clasificaciones clínicas y las pruebas de laboratorio existentes tienen un desempeño variable en la práctica clínica, pues su sensibilidad fluctúa entre 45 y 98 %, y su especificidad, entre 4 y 98 %, lo cual se debe, en parte, a la diversidad de contextos en los que se utilizan. Objetivo. Desarrollar algoritmos clínicos para el diagnóstico del dengue en el contexto colombiano. Materiales y métodos. Se hizo un estudio transversal a partir de fuentes secundarias. Se construyeron algoritmos clínicos de diagnóstico del dengue con base en métodos bayesianos que combinaron síntomas, signos y parámetros del hemograma, y se comparó su exactitud diagnóstica con la de las pruebas de referencia. Se hizo una validación externa del algoritmo de mayor exactitud y sensibilidad, comparándolo con la clasificación clínica de la Organización Mundial de la Salud de 1997 y la del 2009, con la guía colombiana del 2010 y con la escala diagnóstica propuesta por el Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social de Colombia en el 2013. Resultados. Se generaron cuatro algoritmos, dos de signos y síntomas y dos que incluyeron el conteo de leucocitos (≤4.500/mm3) o de plaquetas (≤60.000/mm3). El algoritmo de mayor exactitud incluyó los parámetros del hemograma, con una sensibilidad de 76,5 % (IC95% 71,9-80,5) y una especificidad de 46,0 % (IC95% 37,6-54,7). En la validación externa, la sensibilidad fue de 11,1 % (IC95% 4,9-20,7) y la especificidad fue de 91,9 % (IC95% 87,5-93,9). La escala del Ministerio tuvo una sensibilidad de 76,4 % (IC95% 64,9-85,6) y una especificidad de 38,0 % (IC95% 32,8-43,4). Conclusión. La inclusión de los parámetros del hemograma mejoró la sensibilidad de los algoritmos de diagnóstico basados en los signos y los síntomas. Sin embargo, el diagnóstico clínico del dengue sigue siendo un reto para la investigación en salud.


Abstract Introduction: Due to the increase in dengue incidence and mortality, its diagnosis is relevant for endemic countries. Clinical classifications and laboratory tests have a variable performance in clinical practice with a sensitivity level between 45% and 98%, and a specificity level between 4% and 98% partly due to the variety of contexts where they are applied. Objective: To develop clinical algorithms for the diagnosis of dengue in the Colombian context. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted based on secondary sources. We constructed clinical diagnostic algorithms of dengue based on Bayesian methods combining symptoms, signs, and blood count parameters, and then we compared them in terms of diagnostic accuracy with gold standard tests. In addition, an external validation of the algorithm with greater accuracy and sensibility was performed comparing it with the WHO-1997 and the WHO-2009 clinical classifications, the Colombian guide for 2010, and the diagnostic scale recommended by the Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social of Colombia for 2013. Results: Four algorithms were generated, two for signs and symptoms, and two that included leukocytes (≤4,500/mm3) and/or platelets (≤160,000/mm3) counts. The most accurate algorithm included blood count parameters with a sensitivity of 76.5% (95%CI: 71.9-80.5) and a specificity of 46.0% (95%CI: 37.6-54.7). In the external validation we found a sensitivity of 11.1% (95%CI: 4.9-20.7) and a specificity of 91.9% (95%CI: 87.5- 93.9). The scale of the Ministerio de Salud had a sensitivity of 76.4% (95%CI: 64.9-85.6) and a specificity of 38.0% (95%CI: 32.8-43.4). Conclusion: The inclusion of blood count parameters improved the sensitivity of diagnostics algorithms based on signs and symptoms. Clinical diagnosis of dengue remains a challenge for health research.


Assuntos
Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Algoritmos , Dengue/diagnóstico , Estudos Transversais , Teorema de Bayes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Colômbia
6.
Trop Med Int Health ; 23(12): 1282-1293, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30282115

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare WHO's traditional (1997) and revised (2009) guidelines for dengue classification, using a large sample of patients of all ages with varying clinical conditions from a dengue-endemic area in Brazil. METHODS: We compared 30 670 laboratory-confirmed dengue cases (1998-2012) using both WHO's dengue classification guidelines. Stereotype ordinal logistic regressions were used to analyse the association between patients' demographics and signs and symptoms related to dengue infection severity, as defined in the 1997 and 2009 guidelines. We then compared the degree of agreement in dengue classification of both guidelines. RESULTS: Dengue signs and symptoms in patients were poorly correlated to disease severity as defined by both guidelines (Cramer's V test <0.2). Hypotensive shock was the exception for both classifications, presenting dependence (Z = 56.42; P < 0.001, and Z = 55.24; P < 0.001) and high agreement (Cramers's V = 1; P < 0.001, and Cramers's V = 0.97; P < 0.001) for WHO 1997 and 2009, respectively. Last, we also found substantial agreement in disease classification between both guidelines (Kendall tau-b = 0.79; P < 0.001), although 2009 guidelines were more sensitive in the detection of severe cases. CONCLUSIONS: We hope our results will inform the debate about dengue classification guidelines, particularly concerning clinical value, study comparability, and ways in which future guidelines can support the clinical management of dengue. Our results suggest that caution should be taken when using WHO guidelines to assess dengue severity to improve clinical management of patients.


Assuntos
Dengue/classificação , Dengue/epidemiologia , Organização Mundial da Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Brasil/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Distribuição por Sexo , Adulto Jovem
7.
Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz ; 113(8): e170433, 2018. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-955113

RESUMO

BACKGROUND The diagnosis of dengue is complex. Until recently, only specialised laboratories were able to confirm dengue infection. However, this has changed with the newly available immunochromatographic rapid tests. Early diagnosis is of great interest, and point-of-care rapid tests have been increasingly used in Brazil. Most of those tests have not undergone validation in the Brazilian population. In this context, we decided to evaluate a rapid test introduced in the Federal District (FD). OBJECTIVES To estimate the accuracy and reliability of the SD Bioeasy Dengue Duo rapid test and its components to detect dengue infections in a consecutive sample of symptomatic residents in the FD, Brazil. METHODS In total, 1353 venous blood samples were collected between 2013 and 2014. Two hundred and six positive samples (cases) and 246 negative samples (non cases) were required for sensitivity and specificity estimation, respectively; for agreement evaluation, we used 401 samples. The reference standard used was a composite of MAC-ELISA, virus isolation and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). The evaluation was conducted prospectively under field conditions in the public health units of the FD. FINDINGS The results for the overall accuracy of the rapid test (NS1/IgM combined) showed 76% sensitivity and 98% specificity. The sensitivity for the NS1 component (67%) was better than that for the IgM component (35%). The positive likelihood ratio was 46, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.24. The reliability of the test (NS1/IgM combined) demonstrated crude agreement of 98% (Kappa index 0.94). MAIN CONCLUSIONS The present phase III, large-scale validation study demonstrates that the rapid test SD Bioeasy Dengue Duo has moderate sensitivity (NS1/IgM combined) and high specificity. Therefore, the test is useful in confirming the diagnosis of dengue, but not enough to rule out the diagnosis. Our results also suggest that Dengue virus (DENV) viral load estimated through the RT-qPCR and antibody level measured through the MAC-ELISA could have had a direct influence on the accuracy of the rapid test.


Assuntos
Humanos , Imunoglobulina M/análise , Dengue/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Precoce , Brasil/epidemiologia , Chile/epidemiologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue
8.
BMC Infect Dis ; 17(1): 204, 2017 03 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28284209

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Dengue is an acute febrile illness considered the major arboviral disease in terms of morbidity, mortality, economic impact and dissemination worldwide. Brazil accounts for the highest notification rate, with circulation of all four dengue serotypes. The NS1 antigen is a dengue highly conserved specific soluble glycoprotein essential for viral replication and viability that can be detected 0 to 18 days from the onset of fever (peak first 3 days). It induces a strong humoral response and is known as a complement-fixing antigen. Lower NS1 test sensitivity occurs in secondary dengue infections probably due to immune complex formation impairing antigen detection by ELISA. METHODS: We compared the sensitivity of NS1 ELISA in heat dissociated and non-dissociated samples from 156 RT-PCR confirmed acute dengue-4 cases from 362 prospectively enrolled patients. RESULTS: Secondary infections accounted for 83.3% of cases. NS1 ELISA was positive in 42.5% and indeterminate in 10.2% of dengue-4 cases. After heat dissociation, 7 negative and 16 indeterminate samples turned positive, increasing the overall test sensitivity to 57.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Although it is time consuming and requires the use of specific laboratory equipment, NS1 ELISA combined with heat dissociation could be a slightly better alternative for triage in suspected dengue cases.


Assuntos
Dengue/diagnóstico , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/métodos , Glicoproteínas/imunologia , Proteínas não Estruturais Virais/imunologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Brasil , Coinfecção/imunologia , Coinfecção/virologia , Estudos Transversais , Dengue/fisiopatologia , Vírus da Dengue/genética , Vírus da Dengue/imunologia , Feminino , Febre/diagnóstico , Febre/virologia , Glicoproteínas/sangue , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Proteínas não Estruturais Virais/sangue , Adulto Jovem
9.
Artigo em Português | LILACS | ID: lil-724268

RESUMO

Objetivo: A dengue tem importância mundial por sua morbidadee abrangência. O presente artigo teve como objetivo descrever as principais características dos óbitos por dengue,ocorridos no Município do Rio de Janeiro (MRJ), durante aepidemia de 2012. Métodos: Foram descritos os 35 casosde óbitos por dengue ocorridos em 2012 neste município. Asvariáveis estudadas foram coletadas a partir das fichas de investigaçãode óbitos por dengue, padronizadas pelo Ministério daSaúde. Resultados: Encontrou-se maior proporção de óbitosentre 50 e 59 e acima de 70 anos, presença de comorbidadesem 77,8%, ligeiro predomínio do sexo masculino e da raça/corpreta. Principais achados hematológicos: leucopenia em 46,8%,leucocitose em 78,1%, hemoconcentração em 39,4% e plaquetopeniaem 87,9%. Na parte bioquímica: aumento de amilaseem 50%, gama GT em 92,8%, transaminase glutâmico oxaloacética(TGO) em 95,2%, transaminase glutâmico pirúvica(TGP) em 80,9%, bilirrubinas em 69,2%, creatina-fosfoquinase(CPK) em 50% e lactato desidrogenase (LDH) em 100%. Derramecavitário foi descrito em 64,3% e espessamento de parededa vesícula biliar em 37,5%. Manifestações atípicas evidenciadas:neurológicas 8,6%, insuficiência hepática 11,4%, insuficiênciarenal 25,7% e sangramento 22,8%. Conclusão: Oacompanhamento de exames laboratoriais e de imagem auxilia omanejo clínico e a predição da gravidade da dengue. Este acompanhamento,juntamente com a estabilização das morbidadespreexistentes, pode reduzir sua letalidade.(AU)


Objectives: Dengue has global significance for its morbidityand scope. This article aims to describe the main features of deathsdue to dengue, during the dengue epidemic in Rio de Janeiro(MRJ) in 2012. Methods: The 35 cases of obit by dengueoccurred in 2012 in this municipality were described. The studiedvariables were collected from the records of investigation of obitby dengue, standardized by the Ministry of Health. Results:Review of 35 deaths due to dengue that occurred in the city ofRio de Janeiro in 2012 showed a higher proportion between agesof 50 and 59 and also greater than 70 years old, the presence ofcomorbidities in 77.8% and a slight prevalence in male gender andin race/color black. Major hematologic findings were leukopenia(46.8%), leukocytosis (78.1%), hemoconcentration (39.4%)and thrombocytopenia (87.9%). Other lab abnormalities wereamylase (50%), gamma GT (92.8%), aspartate aminotransferase(AST) (95.2%), serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT)alanine transferase (ALT) in 80.9%, bilirubin in 69.2%, creatinephosphokinase in 50% (5/10) and lactate dehydrogenase in100%. Cavity effusions were described in 60% and thickenedgallbladder in 37.5%. Atypical symptoms that were evident:neurological 8.6%, liver failure, 11.4%, kidney failure, 25.7%and bleeding 22.8%. Conclusion: Monitoring the levelsof hematocrit, platelets, aminotransferases and imaging tests helpthe clinical management and prediction of severity of dengueand, along with the stabilization of preexisting comorbidities,may reduce its lethality.(AU)


Assuntos
Dengue/complicações , Dengue/mortalidade , Comorbidade , Epidemiologia Descritiva , Estudos Retrospectivos
10.
J Virol Methods ; 204: 105-8, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24747585

RESUMO

The secreted form of the dengue virus (DENV) nonstructural-1 (NS1) glycoprotein has been shown to be useful for the diagnosis of DENV infections in patients' serum samples. In a number of studies, the sensitivity of the commercially available DENV NS1 glycoprotein detection assays was higher against some DENV serotypes (DENV-1>DENV-3>DENV-2=DENV-4) than others and were also lower using patients' serum samples with secondary versus primary DENV infections. In this study, 471 DENV-4 positive acute phase patients' serum samples were selected from a large panel collected in Brazil from March 2011 to October 2012 by RT-PCR and/or virus isolation followed by serotype determination. The sera from primary (n=228) and secondary (n=238) DENV-4 infections were identified using IgM and IgG capture ELISAs. The sensitivity of a commercial DENV NS1 glycoprotein detection ELISA was then assessed when these serum samples were not pre-treated or pre-treated by acid or heat dissociation prior to being tested. Acid and heat dissociation of patients' serum samples with primary and secondary DENV-4 infections increased significantly the sensitivity of the DENV NS1 glycoprotein detection ELISA from 54.4% to 77.2% (p<0.05) and 82% (p<0.05) and from 39.1% to 63.9% (p<0.05) and 73.1% (p<0.05), respectively. Treatment of DENV infected patients' serum samples using simple and rapid heat dissociation step (100°C for 5min) was, therefore, shown to be very useful for increasing the sensitivity of the DENV NS1 glycoprotein detection ELISA using serum samples from either primary or secondary DENV infected patients.


Assuntos
Antígenos Virais/sangue , Vírus da Dengue/isolamento & purificação , Dengue/diagnóstico , Temperatura Alta , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Ácidos , Brasil , Vírus da Dengue/imunologia , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Glicoproteínas/sangue , Humanos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Proteínas não Estruturais Virais/sangue
11.
J Clin Virol ; 58(1): 41-6, 2013 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23871166

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Dengue is a widely spread arboviral disease in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Dengue fever presents clinical characteristics similar to other febrile illness. Thus laboratory diagnosis is important for adequate management of the disease. OBJECTIVES: The present study was designed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of real-time PCR and serological methods for dengue in a real epidemic context. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical data and blood samples were collected from consecutive patients with suspected dengue who attended a primary health care unit in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Serologic methods and real-time PCR were performed in serum samples to confirm dengue diagnosis. RESULTS: Among the 181 consecutive patients enrolled in this study with suspected dengue, 146 were considered positive by serological criteria (positive NS1 ELISA and/or anti-dengue IgM ELISA) and 138 were positive by real-time PCR. Clinical criteria were not sufficient for distinguishing between dengue and non-dengue febrile illness. The PCR reaction was pre-optimized using samples from patients with known viral infection. It had similar sensitivity compared to NS1 ELISA (88% and 89%, respectively). We also evaluated three commercial lateral flow immunochromatographic tests for NS1 detection (BIOEASY, BIORAD and PANBIO). All three tests showed high sensitivity (94%, 91% and 81%, respectively) for dengue diagnosis. CONCLUSION: According to our results it can be suggested that lateral flow tests for NS1 detection are the most feasible methods for early diagnosis of dengue.


Assuntos
Cromatografia de Afinidade/métodos , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/métodos , Dengue/diagnóstico , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real/métodos , Adulto , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Antígenos Virais/sangue , Brasil , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulina M/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dados de Sequência Molecular , RNA Viral/genética , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Análise de Sequência de DNA
12.
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS-Express | LILACS, LIPECS | ID: biblio-1522712

RESUMO

Objetivo: Se propone como alternativa la obtención de muestras de sangre total en papel filtro, para la determinación de anticuerpos IgM contra dengue, por ser un método de recolección sencillo y no requerir de muchos cuidados en el envío al laboratorio. Materiales y métodos: De 100 pacientes con diagnóstico clínico de dengue clásico, se obtuvieron en forma simultánea, muestras de suero en tubos al vacío y de sangre total en papel filtro. Ambas muestras fueron evaluadas con el método serológico ELISA Captura de IgM a los 30 días de obtenida la muestra. Resultados: De las 100 muestras 25 fueron positivas y 75 negativas en suero, y 24 positivas y 74 negativas en papel filtro. Se obtuvo una concordancia por índice Kappa de 0,97, sensibilidad y especificidad de 96,0% y 98,0% respectivamente; el valor predictivo positivo fue 96,0%, y valor predictivo negativo fue 98,0%. Conclusión: Se evidencia muy buena sensibilidad, especificidad y concordancia en la determinación de IgM contra dengue, al utilizar papel filtro en la obtención de muestra de sangre.


Objective: This study proposes the use of filter paper, in whole blood samples to test for Dengue, as an alternate method, due to the fact that it is very simple and does not require of much detail for shipping samples to the laboratory. Materials and Methods: Using vacutainers and filter papers, whole blood sample obtained simultaneously from 100 patients diagnosed as classic dengue. All samples were tested using IgM capture ELISA. Findings: Out of 100 samples, 25 were positive and 75 were negative in sera, in filter paper 24 positive and 74 negative, with a Kappa concordance index of 0,97 and a sensitivity and specificity of 96,0% and 98,0% respectively: the positive predictive value was 96.0% and the negative predictive value was 98,0%. Conclusions: A very good sensitivity, specificity and concordance in the determination of IgM antibodies against Dengue is evidenced using filter paper when obtaining blood samples.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA