RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Coding variants in apolipoprotein L-1 (APOL1) are associated with an increased risk of end-stage kidney disease (ESRD) in African American individuals under a recessive model of inheritance. The effect of the APOL1 risk alleles on kidney disease has been observed in studies in African American and African populations. Despite the 130 million individuals of recent African ancestry in South America, the impact of APOL1 has not been explored. METHODS: In this case-control study, we tested APOL1 genotype in 106 Brazilian HD (hemodialysis) patients with African ancestry and compared risk allele frequency with 106 healthy first-degree relatives. The association of risk alleles and ESRD was calculated with a linear mixed model and was adjusted for relatedness and additional confounders. In a broader survey, the age of dialysis initiation and APOL1 variants were analyzed in 274 HD patients. RESULTS: Two APOL1 risk alleles were 10 times more common in patients with ESRD than in controls (9.4% vs. 0.9%; odds ratio [OR]: 10.95, SE = 1.49, P = 0.0017). Carriers of 2 risk alleles initiated dialysis 12 years earlier than patients with zero risk alleles. CONCLUSION: The APOL1 risk variants were less frequent in dialysis patients of African ancestry in Brazil than in the United States. Nonetheless, carriers of 2 risk variants had 10-fold higher odds of ESRD. Age of dialysis initiation was markedly lower in 2-risk allele carriers, suggesting a more aggressive disease phenotype. The Brazilian population represents an opportunity to identify different sets of genetic modifiers or environmental triggers that might be present in more extensively studied populations.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The end-stage renal disease Medical Evidence Report serves as a source of comorbid condition data for risk adjustment of quality metrics. We sought to compare comorbid condition data in the Medical Evidence Report around dialysis therapy initiation with diagnosis codes in Medicare claims. STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort study using US Renal Data System data. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Medicare-enrolled elderly (≥66 years) patients who initiated maintenance dialysis therapy July 1 to December 31, 2007, 2008, or 2009. INDEX TESTS: 12 comorbid conditions ascertained from claims during the 6 months before dialysis therapy initiation, the Medical Evidence Report, and claims during the 3 months after dialysis therapy initiation. REFERENCE TEST: None. RESULTS: Comorbid condition prevalence according to claims before dialysis therapy initiation generally exceeded prevalence according to the Medical Evidence Report. The κ statistics for comorbid condition designations other than diabetes ranged from 0.06 to 0.43. Discordance of designations was associated with age, race, sex, and end-stage renal disease Network. During 23,930 patient-years of follow-up from 4 to 12 months after dialysis therapy initiation (8,930 deaths), designations from claims during the 3 months after initiation better discriminated risk of death than designations from the Medical Evidence Report (C statistics of 0.674 vs 0.616). Between the Medical Evidence Report and claims, standardized mortality ratios changed by >10% for more than half the dialysis facilities. LIMITATIONS: Neither the Medical Evidence Report nor diagnosis codes in claims constitute a gold standard of comorbid condition data; results may not apply to nonelderly patients or patients without Medicare coverage. CONCLUSIONS: Discordance of comorbid condition designations from the Medical Evidence Report and claims around dialysis therapy initiation was substantial and significantly associated with patient characteristics, including location. These patterns may engender bias in risk-adjusted quality metrics. In lieu of the Medical Evidence Report, claims during the 3 months after dialysis therapy initiation may constitute a useful source of comorbid condition data.