Addition of Jejunal Lateral Anastomosis is Not Necessary for Gastric-Jejunum Pouch Anastomosis following Distal Gastrectomy: A Propensity-Score Matching Analysis.

PURPOSE: To make a propensity-score matching analysis on the clinical application of gastric-jejunum pouch anastomosis (GJPA) and continuous jejunal pouch and residual stomach anastomosis combined with jejunal lateral anastomosis (Contin-L). METHODS: The clinic data of 287 patients who received distal gastrectomy from January 2015 to January 2019 were collected retrospectively. The enrolled patients were divided into the GJPA group and the Contin-L group according to the reconstruction method used. Clinical data and operation complications were analyzed. RESULTS: Compared with Contin-L group, the duration of digestive tract reconstruction in the GJPA group was shorter, and the overall cost in the GJPA group was lower. No obvious intergroup differences were found in other intraoperative data, early surgical outcomes, incidence rates of reflux gastritis, anastomotic ulcer, postoperative nutritional and hematological indicators. The postoperative subjective feelings in the GJPA group were similar with those in the Contin-L groups. CONCLUSION: Addition of jejunal lateral anastomosis is not necessary for GJPA following distal gastrectomy.

Application value of modified Overlap esophagogastric tube reconstruction in totally laparos-copic radical proximal gastrectomy / 中华消化外科杂志

Objective:To investigate the application value of modified Overlap esophago-gastric tube (MO-EG) reconstruction in totally laparoscopic radical proximal gastrectomy.Methods:The retrospective and descriptive study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 7 patients with upper gastric cancer or adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG) who underwent totally laparoscopic radical proximal gastrectomy with MO-EG reconstruction in the Second Hospital of Jilin University from January 2019 to December 2020 were collected. There were 4 males and 3 females, aged 62(range, 55-72)years. The body mass index of the 7 patients was 21.5(range, 18.5-26.0)kg/m 2. Of the 7 patients, 2 cases had early upper third gastric cancer and 5 cases had Siewert Ⅱ AEG. All patients underwent totally laparoscopic radical proximal gastrectomy with MO-EG recons-truction using barbed sutures. Observation indicators: (1) surgical situations; (2) postoperative recovery situations; (3) postoperative histopathological examinations; (4) follow-up. Follow-up was conducted using outpatient examination and telephone interview to detect postoperative esophageal reflux, endoscopic classification of esophageal reflux, anastomotic complications, tumor recurrence and metastasis and survival of patients up to December 2021. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD and measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M(range). Count data were described as absolute numbers. Results:(1) Surgical situations. All the 7 patients underwent totally laparoscopic radical proximal gastrectomy and D 1+ lymph node dissection with MO-EG reconstruction through abdominal transhiatal approach. None of the 7 patients underwent conversion to open surgery or additional thoracotomy. The operation time, time of digestive reconstruction, volume of intraoperative blood loss and length of esophagus dissected of 7 patients were (271±36)minutes, (44±10)minutes, (53±26)mL and (6.4±0.3)cm, respec-tively. (2) Postoperative recovery situations. The time to postoperative initial out-of-bed activities, time to postoperative first flatus, time to postoperative initial liquid food intake and duration of hospital stay of 7 patients were (21±5)hours, (2.9±0.9)days, (5.0±0.7)days and (10.1±1.9)days, respectively. None of the 7 patients had postoperative severe complications such as bleeding, anasto-motic leakage or mortality. One patient had postoperative pulmonary infection and recovered after anti-infection treatment. Two patients had pleural effusion and were improved after conserva-tive treatment. (3) Postoperative histopathological examinations. The tumor diameter of 7 patients was (2.5±0.7)cm. Histopathological examination of upper margins of 7 patients was negative. The distance between the esophagus margin and the superior margin of the tumor of patients with AEG was (1.8±0.6)cm. The number of lymph node dissected and the number of inferior mediastinum lymph node dissected of 7 patients were 26.0±3.6 and 3.7±1.1, respectively. Pathological TNM stages of 7 patients were 2 cases of stage ⅠB, 4 cases of ⅡA, 1 case of ⅡB. (4) Follow-up. All the 7 patients were followed up for 18(range, 12?36)months. Of the 7 patients, 4 cases reported asymptomatic, 2 cases had symptoms of reflux and 1 case had chocked feeling after eating. All the 7 patients underwent barium meal examination of gastrointestinal tract without anastomotic dysfunction or anastomotic stenosis. Six of the 7 patients underwent gastroscopy at postoperative 1 year and only 1 of them reported grade B reflux esophagitis according to Los Angeles classification, while the rest of 5 patients had no evidence of obvious reflux. None of the 7 patients had postoperative gastric cancer tumor recurrence, metastasis or death. Conclusion:Application of MO-EG reconstruction in totally laparoscopic radical proximal gastrectomy is safe and feasible, with satisfactory short-term effects.

[Chinese expert consensus on intracorporeal digestive reconstruction after robotic gastrectomy (2021 edition)].

The robotic surgical system applied to gastrectomy is regarded as a safe technique which has similar short- and long-term outcomes compared to laparoscopic and open gastrectomy. With the iteration of anastomotic staplers and improvement of anastomotic skills, coupled with the flexible robot's rotatable device making the manual intracorporal anastomosis easier, gastrointestinal reconstruction after robotic gastrectomy has also started to move toward the era of complete intracorporal anastomosis. In order to further standardize the indications and operating points, the Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Group of Surgical Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, the Gastrointestinal Surgery Group of Surgery Branch of Chinese Medical Association, the Digestive Tract Cancer Committee of Chinese Research Hospital Association, and Cancer Gastroenterology Society of Chinese Anticancer Association jointly organized domestic experts in general surgery field to formulate the Chinese expert consensus on intracorporal digestive reconstruction after robotic gastrectomy (2021 edition). The definition of intracorporeal digestive reconstruction after robotic gastrectomy is that all surgical steps of digestive reconstruction are done totally in the abdominal cavity by robotic system or all steps mentioned above except jejunojejunal extracorporeal anastomosis. The digestive reconstructions mainly include Billroth I anastomosis, Billroth II anastomosis, Billroth II+ Braun anastomosis, Roux-en-Y anastomosis, Uncut Roux-en-Y anastomosis after distal gastrectomy; double-tract anastomosis, esophagogastric anastomosis by stapler or hand-sewn technique (double flap gastroesophagostomy) after proximal gastrectomy; FEEA method, π-type anastomosis, overlap method and modified procedures, Uncut Roux-en-Y anastomosis, Parisi's double-loop reconstruction after total gastrectomy. Compared with extracorporeal digestive reconstruction, intracorporeal digestive reconstruction operated by robotic system can minimize the surgical incision, reduce the risk of abdominal exposure and accelerate postoperative recovery, etc. Previous studies have demonstrated promising results. We believe that the publication of the consensus will guide surgeons to break through the technical barriers of intracorporeal digestive reconstruction after robotic gastrectomy, which will be more and more widespread with the gradual maturity of domestic robotic systems by bringing less medical costs.

Chinese expert consensus on intracorporeal digestive reconstruction after robotic gastrectomy (2021 edition) / 中华胃肠外科杂志

The robotic surgical system applied to gastrectomy is regarded as a safe technique which has similar short- and long-term outcomes compared to laparoscopic and open gastrectomy. With the iteration of anastomotic staplers and improvement of anastomotic skills, coupled with the flexible robot's rotatable device making the manual intracorporal anastomosis easier, gastrointestinal reconstruction after robotic gastrectomy has also started to move toward the era of complete intracorporal anastomosis. In order to further standardize the indications and operating points, the Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Group of Surgical Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, the Gastrointestinal Surgery Group of Surgery Branch of Chinese Medical Association, the Digestive Tract Cancer Committee of Chinese Research Hospital Association, and Cancer Gastroenterology Society of Chinese Anticancer Association jointly organized domestic experts in general surgery field to formulate the Chinese expert consensus on intracorporal digestive reconstruction after robotic gastrectomy (2021 edition). The definition of intracorporeal digestive reconstruction after robotic gastrectomy is that all surgical steps of digestive reconstruction are done totally in the abdominal cavity by robotic system or all steps mentioned above except jejunojejunal extracorporeal anastomosis. The digestive reconstructions mainly include Billroth I anastomosis, Billroth II anastomosis, Billroth II+ Braun anastomosis, Roux-en-Y anastomosis, Uncut Roux-en-Y anastomosis after distal gastrectomy; double-tract anastomosis, esophagogastric anastomosis by stapler or hand-sewn technique (double flap gastroesophagostomy) after proximal gastrectomy; FEEA method, π-type anastomosis, overlap method and modified procedures, Uncut Roux-en-Y anastomosis, Parisi's double-loop reconstruction after total gastrectomy. Compared with extracorporeal digestive reconstruction, intracorporeal digestive reconstruction operated by robotic system can minimize the surgical incision, reduce the risk of abdominal exposure and accelerate postoperative recovery, etc. Previous studies have demonstrated promising results. We believe that the publication of the consensus will guide surgeons to break through the technical barriers of intracorporeal digestive reconstruction after robotic gastrectomy, which will be more and more widespread with the gradual maturity of domestic robotic systems by bringing less medical costs.

4K totally laparoscopic radical resection of left hemicolon cancer and intraperitoneal overlap digestive reconstruction / 中华消化外科杂志

Laparoscopic radical resection of left hemicolon cancer is difficult in lymph node dissection, splenic flexure dissociation and digestive tract reconstruction. The high resolution recognition ability of 4K laparoscopic system can help complete mesocolic excision and neuroprotec-tion of the left colon. The authors discuss the key points of 4K totally laparoscopic radical resection of left hemicolon cancer and intraperitoneal overlap digestive reconstruction through surgical examples.

Clinical efficacy of radical proximal gastrectomy with esophagogastrostomy and double-tract anastomosis for upper gastric cancer / 中华消化外科杂志

Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of radical proximal gastrectomy with esophagogastrostomy and double-tract anastomosis for upper gastric cancer.Methods:The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 172 patients who underwent radical proximal gastrectomy for upper gastric cancer in Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital from January 2018 to December 2020 were collected. There were 147 males and 25 females, aged from 25 to 81 years, with a median age of 62 years. All the 172 patients underwent digestive reconstruction. Of the 172 patients, 83 cases undergoing esophagogastrostomy were allocated into esophagogastrostomy group, 89 cases undergoing double-tract anastomosis were allocated into double-tract anastomosis group. Patients were performed radical proximal gastrectomy combined with D 1+ lymph node dissection by attending surgeons from department of gastric cancer. The operator decided to adopt esophagogastrostomy or double-tract anastomosis for digestive reconstruction. Observation indicators: (1) surgical situations; (2) follow-up. Follow-up using outpatient examination, telephone interview, and online APP was conducted at postoperative 1 month, once three months within postoperative 2 years, and once six months within postoperative 2-5 years. The questionnaires of reflux esophagitis, gastroscopy and upper gastrointestinal angio-graphy were conducted to evaluate gastroesophageal reflux and anastomotic stenosis up to February 1, 2021. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD, and comparison between groups was analyzed using the t test. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M (range), and comparison between groups was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Comparison of ordinal data was analyzed using the non-parameter rank sum test. Count data were represented as absolute numbers, and comparison between groups was analyzed using the chi-square test. Results:(1) Surgical situations: cases with open, laparoscopic or Da Vinci robotic surgery (surgical method), the number of metastatic lymph node, duration of postoperative hospital stay were 74, 9, 0, 2(range, 0-15), (12±4)days for the esophagogastrostomy group, versus 65, 15, 9, 3(range, 0-28), (11±3)days for the double-tract anastomosis group, respectively, showing significant differences in the above indicators between the two groups ( χ2=10.887, Z=-1.058, t=3.284, P<0.05). (2) Follow-up: 172 patients were followed up for 2-38 months, with a median follow-up time of 13 months. Cases with gastroesophageal reflux and anastomotic stenosis were 58 and 10 for the esophagogastrostomy group, versus 14 and 1 for the double-tract anastomosis group, respectively, showing significant differences in the above indicators between the two groups ( χ2=51.743, 7.219, P<0.05). Conclusions:For upper gastric cancer patients undergoing proximal radical gastrectomy, double-tract anastomosis is more suitable for Siewert type Ⅱ adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction in large curvature or lower located tumor. Compared with esophago-gastrostomy, double-tract anastomosis has lower incidence of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux and anastomotic stenosis, without increasing complications.

Resection of GIST in the duodenum and proximal jejunum: A retrospective analysis of outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), with a primary occurrence in the duodenum and proximal jejunum, are rare and treatment is poorly understood. This study aimed to evaluate the main factors influencing the prognosis of GIST resection in this complex anatomical structure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 47 patients who underwent surgery for primary GIST of the duodenum (20) and proximal jejunum (27) between 2012 and 2017. Perioperative clinical data as well as relapse and survival information were collected. RESULTS: All patients underwent negative margin resection (R0) of duodenal and proximal jejunum GISTs. Complications occurred more frequently in treatment of duodenal GISTs than proximal jejunum GISTs (p = 0.003). GISTs in D3 (the 3rd portion of duodenum) were related to larger tumor size (p = 0.001), higher probability of severe complication rate (p = 0.042), longer hospital stays (p = 0.023) and fasting time (p = 0.020). More complications were found for patients with digestive reconstruction than limited resection (p = 0.010). Additionally, patients with a tumor mass larger than 5 cm or a mitotic index greater than 5 mitoses/50 HPFs showed poorer therapeutic outcomes. The 1- and 3-year overall survival was 97.9% and 86.1%, respectively and were not influenced by operation type (p = 0.061) or GIST position (p = 0.447). CONCLUSION: With negative operational margins, limited resection is a safe and feasible procedure for duodenal and proximal jejunum GIST patients and unnecessary digestive reconstruction should be avoided. Considering the severe complication rate, resection for GISTs in D3 should be performed with care.

A novel intestinal rotation method for digestive reconstruction after combined pancreaticoduodenectomy and extended right hemicolectomy: A case report and surgical technique.

INTRODUCTION: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) combined with extended right hemicolectomy (RH) is a challenging procedure for locally advanced malignancies. However, information concerning the reconstruction method of the digestive system is limited. Here, we present a case and surgical technique of a novel intestinal rotation method for digestive reconstruction after PD combined with RH. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 62-year-old man with locally advanced pancreatic cancer received conversion surgery combined with PD and RH after preoperative chemotherapy. With respect to the reconstruction of the digestive system, the entire intestinal mesentery was rotated 180° forward counterclockwise around the axis of the superior mesenteric artery, and then the reconstruction, according to Child's method, was performed. The patient recovered without problems in gastroenterological functions after the operation. DISCUSSION: With respect to the reconstruction of the digestive system in patients undergoing combined PD and RH, practitioners should pay close attention to twisting of the intestinal mesentery when bringing up the proximal jejunum for pancreatojejunostomy and hepatojejunostomy and the distal ileum for ileocolic anastomosis. This intestinal rotation method enables a smooth and uneventful reconstruction of the digestive system. CONCLUSION: This is the first detailed description of an intestinal rotation method for digestive reconstruction after combined PD and extended RH. The intestinal rotation method can be an alternative and helpful technical option for digestive reconstruction in patients with combined PD and RH.

Comparative study on digestive reconstruction after tota1 gastrectomy / 中国基层医药

Objective To explore the type of the rational digestive reconstruction after total gastrectomy for gastric malignancy.Metlhods Three types of digestive reconstruction were performed after total gastrectomy in 121 cases with gastric carcinoma.The operating time,morbidity and mortality,digestive tract symptoms,nutritional status in 1 year after operation were compared.Results There were no signifioant differences among the three procedures in operative morbidity and mortality,postoperative food intake,nutritional status,incidences of diarrhea and dumping syndrome.Roux-en-Y esophajejunostomy and P-type esophajejunostomy had an advantage d anti-esophageal reflux,and are obviously superior to Lahey + Braun anastomosis.Roux-en-Y esophajejunostomy was simpler with shorter operating time and less complication.Condusion Roux-en-Y esophajejunostomy and P-type esophajejunostomy could be recommended as suitable methods for digestive reconstruction after total gastrectomy.

Significance of modified Lawrence's reconstuction procedures following total gastrectomy for gastric cancer / 国际外科学杂志

Objective To explore the influence of modified Lawrence's reconstuction procedures following total gastrectomy for gastric cancer to alimentation of patients. Methods Retrospective analysis of nutritional status and symptoms of digestive tract in 76 patiens of total gastrectomy for gastric cancer while 3 and 6 month after modified Lawrence's reconstuction procedure. Results Examination was given in 48 patients 3 month after operation. Emptying time of barium was 60-100 min, barium meal backflowing to esophagus was not observed in all patients when they were in erect or decubitus position, no sign of narrow of anastomotic stoma. The hemoglobin, total protein, body weight and food-intake of patients 3 or 6 months after operation was as same as them before operation. Conclusion The patients undergoing this reconstuction procedure will recover normal food habits soon after operation, Lawrence's reconstuction procedures is a satisfactory choice in patients of total gastrectomy for gastric cancer because of its safety and convenient.

Clinical analysis transabdominal incision total gastrctomy for gastric carcinoma in 170 cases / 临床外科杂志

Objective To investigate the indications and suitable surgical operation routes of total gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma and the reconstruction procedure of digestive tract following total gastrectomy.Methods The clinical data of total gastrectomy by abdominal incision in 170 patients with GC from 1991 to 2001 were reviewed.Results Radical total gastrectomy was prfomed in 132 cases,palliative total gastrectomy in 38 cases,total gastrectomy with combined re section of other organs in 18 cases,Roux en Y esophagojejunostomy in 110 cases following total gastrectomy.Interposition with jejunum in 60 cases following total gastrectomy.There are 20 cases with dumping syndrome and 6 cases with reflux esophagitis occurring in Roux en Y esophagojejunostomy,but none of cases occurs in those by interposition with jejunum.Conclusions (1)Transabdominal incision is the better choice for patients of GC,especially gastrocardiac carcinoma.(2)The total gastrectomy can raise the survival rate and quality of life of patients with GC,if the indications are stricted.(3)Interposition with jejunum following total gastrectomy is superior to Roux en Y esophagojejunostomy.

The comparison Lahey’s and Lawrence’s reconstuction procedures following total gastrectomy for gastric cancer / 中国现代普通外科进展

Objective: To explore the effects of Layhey’s and Lawrence’s reconstruction procedures on nutritional status and digestive symptoms following total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Methods: To analyze retrospectively 146 patients performed total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Among them,83 cases were operated by Lahey’s reconstruction procedures and 63 cases by Lawrence’s.It was focused on the comparision of the body weight changing,nutritional status and digestive symptoms in 6 months after operation.Results: In 6 months after operation,the weight loss of Lawrence group was less than that of Lahey group significanly.For the level of total protein and albumin at that time,they increased in Lawrence group,but decreased in Lahey’ group,and the difference was significant.The changing tedency for hemoglobin level in Lawrence group was less than that of Lahey group,but there was no significant difference between them.For the quantity and frequency of food intake,there was no significnat difference between them.In Lawrence group,the number of patients with vomiting were less than that in Lahey’group significantly.Conclusion:The Lawrence reconstruction procedure is more reasonable following total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.