Expert Consensus on the Diagnosis and Management of Digoxin Toxicity.

While there has been a decline in the use of digoxin in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation, acute and chronic digoxin toxicity remains a significant clinical problem. Digoxin's narrow therapeutic window and nonspecific signs and symptoms of toxicity create clinical challenges and uncertainty around the diagnostic criteria of toxicity and responsive treatment choices for the bedside clinician. A systematic review of published literature on digoxin toxicity (34,587 publications over 6 decades, with 114 meeting inclusion criteria) was performed to develop 33 consensus statements on diagnostic and therapeutic approaches which were then evaluated through a modified Delphi process involving a panel of experts in cardiology, nursing, emergency medicine, and medical toxicology. The results demonstrate agreement about the need to consider time of ingestion and nature of the exposure (ie, acute, acute-on-chronic, chronic) and the use of digoxin immune Fab for life-threatening exposure to decrease risk of death. While several areas of continued uncertainty were identified, this work offers formalized guidance that may help providers better manage this persistent clinical challenge.

[Cardiogenic shock following yew needle poisoning : Digoxin immune fab, va-ECMO and albumin dialysis for the treatment of a suicidal yew leaf poisoning]. / Kardiogener Schock nach Eibennadelintoxikation : Digitalisantidot, va-ECMO und Albumindialyse in der Therapie der suizidalen Eibennadelintoxikation.

We present the case of a 46-year-old male who developed refractory bradycardia with cardiogenic shock after attempting suicide by ingestion of yew leaves. Due to delayed availability of the Digoxin immune fab, a va-ECMO was established to maintain sufficient circulation. Administration of the digoxin fab resulted in recovery of spontaneous circulation. Continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration with hemoadsorption and albumin dialysis were initiated with the intention to remove immune fab-toxin complexes and as organ support in acute kidney and liver failure. Within 5 days the patient was successfully weaned from ECMO, liver support and renal replacement and discharged without physical sequelae.

A BRIEF SYNOPSIS OF MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY FOR THE TREATMENT OF VARIOUS GROUPS OF DISEASES.

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are increasingly being prescribed to patients and investigated in the field of medicine and research. This class of medication is unique due to its ability to be engineered into targeting a specific receptor. Numerous studies and reviews have reported the efficacy, potency, and clinical usage of mAbs in the treatment of a variety of diseases ranging from autoimmune disorders to malignant cancers. However, very few publications classify and provide a brief synopsis of mAbs that includes their pharmacological profiles. mechanisms of action, uses, and side effects in a concise manner. Therefore, this review aims to classify the current mAbs drugs used in clinical practice according to system diseases by providing a brief summary for each of them. For example, regarding cardiovascular disorders, mAbs such as Abciximab, Bevacizumab, and Digoxin Immune Fab will be reviewed. Denosumab, used to treat musculoskeletal disorders, will be also discussed. In addition, mAbs such as Adalimumab, Eculizumab, Natalizumab used in autoimmune disorders and Alemtuzumab, Trastuzumab, Cetuximab, and Rituximab that are prescribed for tumors will be reviewed. Finally, we shall discuss two mAbs that are IL-6 antagonists, Tocilizumab and Siltuximab, which are in ongoing clinical trials as potential treatments of COVID-19. The mAbs have profound benefits against chronic and malignant conditions, and the overall purpose of this review is to illustrate the basic pharmacological profiles of mAbs that physicians may find useful in establishing their management protocols.

A 5 Years Assessment of Patients with Acute Digoxin Poisoning: A Toxicoepidemiology Study in Iran.

Background: Digoxin poisoning leads to the development of cardiac and noncardiac complications. Digoxin immune fab is a safe and effective antidote, but clinical trials have not been performed in this regard, and most of the evidence is based on prospective studies. Understanding the toxicoepidemiology pattern of digoxin poisoning could provide valuable context for better managing its acute poisoning. Objectives: This study aimed to assess the toxicoepidemiology pattern of acute digoxin poisoning through a 5-year assessment in Iran. Methodology: In this observational study, the records of 97 patients who were referred with acute digoxin poisoning between 2010 and 2015 were evaluated. Demographic characteristics, past medical history, drug history, chief complaints, vital signs, paraclinical findings, digoxin immune fab administration, and clinical outcomes recorded. Results: The mean age of patients was 34.02 ± 17.87 years old. About 24.7% of patients had underlying diseases, and among them, heart failure was the most prevalent disease (29.2%) 42.3% of patients needed intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The mean duration of ICU stay was 4.00 ± 2.29 days. Digoxin immune fab was administered for 4.1% of patients, and an average of 6.2 ± 2.2 vials were used for them. All patients survived, and no mortality was reported. Conclusions: Digoxin immune fab administration did not alter the mortality rate. Hence, it can be concluded digoxin immune fab is not appropriate in acute poisoning, but it may be considered in chronic poisoning. Furthermore, acute digoxin poisoning is more common in Iran, and it responds appropriately to conventional treatment.