Comparison of Vaginal Dinoprostone Pessary With Transcervical Balloon Catheter Plus Vaginal Misoprostol for Pre-induction Cervical Ripening: A Randomized Trial.

Aims and Objectives To compare the safety and efficacy of dinoprostone pessary with Foley plus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening. Materials and Methods We randomized 115 women to the pessary or Foley plus misoprostol group. Pessary was inserted for 24 hours, and in the Foley plus misoprostol group, intravaginal misoprostol 25 mcg was administered along with trans-cervical Foley insertion and repeated every six hours to a maximum dose of 100 mcg. Singleton pregnancies requiring labor induction at more than 34 weeks with a Bishop score of <6 were included. Study outcomes included induction-delivery interval (IDI), mode of delivery, change in the Bishop score, need for oxytocin augmentation, and patient discomfort as assessed by visual analog score. Results The IDI was similar between the groups (pessary vs Foley plus misoprostol; 21.27 vs 21.10 hours, p = 0.9). The mean change in the Bishop score and need for augmentation with oxytocin was significantly more in the Foley plus misoprostol group compared to pessary (2.72 vs 1.94, p = 0.001; 89.7% vs 57.9%, p = 0.0001). Pessary was better tolerated compared to Foley plus misoprostol (VAS 7.8 vs 6.68, p = 0.0001). Mode of delivery and maternal and neonatal outcomes showed no difference. Conclusion There was no significant difference between pessary and Foley plus misoprostol in the IDI and mode of delivery. Pessary was better tolerated, and augmentation with oxytocin was required less often. Foley plus misoprostol caused a faster change in the Bishop score, but oxytocin augmentation was used more often. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were similar.

The efficacy and safety of second dinoprostone pessary or balloon catheter after unsuccessful primary ripening with dinoprostone pessary.

We investigated which treatment should be applied if primary cervical ripening with a dinoprostone pessary is unsuccessful. We included 281 women who experienced unsuccessful cervical ripening with a dinoprostone pessary and continued on induction of labour (IOL). Of the 281 women recruited, 177 were given a second dose of dinoprostone; 104 women received a balloon catheter. The second dinoprostone pessary was successful in achieving vaginal delivery in 88 of the 177 (48.6%) women, while the balloon catheter was successful in 42 of the 104 women (40.4%); there was no significant difference between the two treatments with regards to successful vaginal delivery. However, of the women who experienced successful vaginal delivery, the delivery rate in the dinoprostone group was significantly higher than that in the balloon catheter group 12, 24, 36, or 48 h after insertion (p = .0094, .0005, .0258, .0483, respectively). The neonatal outcomes, the proportion of maternal infection and postpartum haemorrhage were similar between the two groups.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Labour induction is a common procedure in obstetrics in a bid to achieve vaginal delivery in China, because vaginal delivery is more beneficial and associated with a better quality of life as compared to a Caesarean delivery. There is consensus relating to the preferred method of IOL after unsuccessful IOL with a dinoprostone pessary.What do the results of this study add? This is the first study in a Chinese population to compare the dinoprostone pessary and balloon catheter for women with no response to dinoprostone for cervical ripening with a sample size greater than 100. We found that a second dose of dinoprostone can reduce the time from the re-initiation of IOL to vaginal delivery compared with the balloon catheter. Our data also indicated that all other outcomes relating to the mother and infant were similar.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or future research? A second dose of dinoprostone is a superior choice for women who experience unsuccessful IOL with dinoprostone to further accelerate vaginal delivery.

Dinoprostone pessary for labor induction in Chinese patients with premature rupture of membranes at term: A retrospective cohort.

AIM: Whether the use of dinoprostone pessary increased the vaginal delivery rate of labor induction in Chinese nulliparous women with term premature rupture of membranes (PROM) and unfavorable cervices? METHODS: PROM women at term with singleton pregnancies and Bishop scores ≤4 who needed labor induction were enrolled in this retrospective study. They received either the dinoprostone pessary followed by oxytocin infusion if necessary (n = 102, PGE2 group) or oxytocin infusion alone (n = 103, oxytocin group). RESULTS: Compared with oxytocin infusion alone, vaginal delivery within 12 h and total vaginal delivery were higher in the PGE2 group (28.4% vs 7.8%, p = 0.0001; 79.4% vs 62.1%, p = 0.009, respectively). There were no statistical differences between the two groups in terms of maternal and neonatal outcomes, such as postpartum hemorrhage, endometritis, third- and fourth-degree vaginal lacerations and neonatal weight, 1- and 5-min Apgar score ≤7, neonatal jaundice, and neonatal unit admission (p > 0.05). However, there was a higher rate of uterine hyperstimulation in the PGE2 group (20.6% vs 3.9%, p < 0.0001). The effective rate of cervical ripening increased in the PGE2 group at 8 and 12 h of labor induction (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher rates of uterine hyperstimulation, the use of dinoprostone was associated with higher rates of vaginal deliveries in Chinese nulliparous women with term PROM and Bishop scores ≤4, compared with use of oxytocin only.

Clinical evaluation of dinoprostone pessary for cervical ripening and labor induction in term pregnancy / 医学研究生学报

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of controlled-release dinoprostone pessary(propess) in cervical ripening and intermediate labor induction.Methods:Eighty primiparas with uterogestation and Bishop score ≤6 points and no vaginal delivery taboo were equally divided into a study and a control group.The former received intravaginal administration of propess and the latter intravenous injection of low-dose oxytocin by the randomized control method.Comparisons were made of the Bishop score,delivery and the state of the fetuses and neonates between the two groups.The side effects of propess were observed.Results:Bishop scores were 7.75?2.227 and 6.38?2.862 in the study and the control group respectively 12 hours after the medication,significantly higher than 4.23?1.025 and 4.15?1.099 before the induction(P 0.05).The major side effect of propess was the over-frequent and over-strong contraction of the uterine,which occurred in 2 cases in the study group but subsided after its removal.Conclusion:Dinoprostone pessary,effective,safe and convenient,is obviously superior to oxytocin in cervical ripening and labor induction.