Mechanical Aortic Valve Thrombosis During Anticoagulation Using Oral Rivaroxaban: A Case Report.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used in cardiovascular medicine. Although rivaroxaban has potential benefits for anticoagulation in certain contexts, DOACs remain contraindicated in patients with mechanical heart valves. This case report highlights the life-threatening risks of rivaroxaban use in patients with mechanical aortic valves, underscoring the lack of proven efficacy and the necessity of adhering to established anticoagulation protocols with warfarin for this patient population. Here, we report a case of a 65-year-old man who had previously undergone aortic valve replacement and developed a thrombus in the mechanical aortic valve six months after switching from warfarin to rivaroxaban. The patient experienced a sudden loss of consciousness and chest discomfort. Echocardiography revealed a thrombus in the valve requiring urgent reoperation and replacement with a bioprosthetic valve. The postoperative recovery was uneventful.

Direct Oral Anticoagulant Treatment for Atherosclerosis-Induced Aortic Mural Thrombus in an Elderly Male With Aspirin Resistance.

Aortic mural thrombus is associated with atherosclerosis in a vast majority of cases and could result in multiple organ damage, leading to higher morbidity and mortality rates. Although aspirin could be effective for primary prevention in atherosclerosis-induced aortic mural thrombus, aspirin resistance, which refers to the inadequate response to aspirin therapy, allows the progression of thrombus. Classically, warfarin could be an effective treatment for thromboembolic diseases, while in recent years, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have shown superior safety and efficacy, particularly in elderly patients. This report presents the case of an elderly male with chronic aortic mural thrombi due to atherosclerosis and aspirin resistance who achieved favorable outcomes following treatment with DOACs. DOACs could be a possible option for managing aortic mural thrombus with aspirin resistance.

Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Vitamin K Antagonists in Preventing Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Patients with atrial fibrillation and concurrent liver cirrhosis have been excluded from major clinical trials evaluating direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) due to safety concerns. This has led to uncertainty regarding the optimal anticoagulant therapy in this population at high risk of thromboembolic events. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness and safety of DOACs versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with atrial fibrillation and liver cirrhosis. Databases including Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Web of Science were searched for relevant studies. The primary effectiveness outcome was stroke or systemic embolism, and the safety outcome was major bleeding events. A total of 10 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to VKAs, the use of DOACs was associated with a significantly lower risk of stroke or systemic embolism (RR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.65-0.92, p=0.005). The risk of all-cause mortality was comparable between the two groups (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.74-1.07, p=0.23). Notably, DOACs demonstrated a significantly lower risk of major bleeding events (RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.61-0.73, p<0.01) compared to VKAs. This meta-analysis suggests that DOACs may be a favorable alternative to VKAs for the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation and liver cirrhosis, with a lower risk of stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding. However, further research is needed to establish optimal dosing strategies and assess the safety and efficacy of DOACs in patients with advanced liver disease.

Paravertebral Block for Multiple Rib Fractures in an Anticoagulated Trauma Patient.

This case report presents the complex analgesia management of a 52-year-old male with a significant medical history including atrial fibrillation treated with apixaban, essential trigeminal neuralgia, non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, and chronic systolic heart failure. The patient experienced a loss of control while riding a motorized bicycle, resulting in a fall and head injury with no loss of consciousness. Upon admission, he tested positive for ethanol, cannabinoids, and oxycodone. The physical exam was significant for right cephalohematoma and right elbow hematoma. Imaging revealed multiple injuries, including right rib fractures (T3-12) with hemothorax. Right paravertebral catheters were placed in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Direct oral anticoagulant therapy in adolescent venous thromboembolism: A systematic review.

Adolescent venous thromboembolism (VTE) has unique challenges in management, complications, and compliance to anticoagulants. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been approved for pediatric VTE management, with an increasing use especially in adolescents. Primary objective is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DOAC therapy in adolescent VTE. Secondary objectives include adverse events, bleeding events, and overall mortality. A SR protocol was registered in PROSPERO 2022 (CRD42022363928). Databases were searched from inception to September 22, 2022. Studies with children aged 10-18 years, VTE diagnosis, DOAC therapy, randomized control trials (RCTs), cohort, and relevant study types were included. Studies including prophylaxis, non-DOAC therapy, arterial thrombosis, age outliers, non-relevant study types were excluded. Findings are reported in accordance to PRISMA 2020. Nine reports from five studies, published between 2016 and 2022, were included. Rivaroxaban was the most common DOAC. VTE recurrence was 0.02% in the rivaroxaban phase III trial and one patient in the dabigatran phase IIb/III trial. Complete/partial thrombus resolution (CR/PR) was 76.6% in the rivaroxaban phase III trial, and 83.9% in the dabigatran phase IIb/III trial. CR/PR was found to be 68.4% in Dhaliwal et al. study and 83.3% in Hassan et al. study. Major bleeding occurred in one patient. Headache and gastrointestinal symptoms were commonly seen. All-cause mortality occurred in a patient due to cancer progression. DOAC therapy in adolescent VTE had CR/PR in two-thirds of the patients, with low incidence of VTE recurrence and major bleeding. As there are only two randomized controlled trial (RCTs), future adolescents' studies are required to validate our results.

Potential interactions between medications for rate control and direct oral anticoagulants: Population-based cohort and case-crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are commonly co-prescribed with amiodarone/diltiazem/verapamil, but whether there is a drug interaction between these drugs is unclear. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk of clinical outcomes associated with concomitant use of DOACs and amiodarone/diltiazem/verapamil. METHODS: We identified DOAC users in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2019. We used a cohort design to estimate hazard ratios for ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, venous thromboembolism, intracranial bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, other bleeding, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality, comparing DOACs + amiodarone/diltiazem/verapamil users and DOACs + beta-blocker users. A case-crossover design comparing odds of exposure to different drug initiation patterns for all outcomes in hazard window vs referent window within an individual also was conducted. RESULTS: Of 397,459 DOAC users, we included 9075 co-prescribed amiodarone, 9612 co-prescribed diltiazem, and 2907 co-prescribed verapamil. There was no difference in risk of any outcomes between DOACs + amiodarone/diltiazem/verapamil users vs DOACs + beta-blocker users in the cohort design. However, in the case-crossover design, we observed an odds ratio (OR) of 2.09 (99% confidence interval [CI] 1.37-3.18) for all-cause mortality associated with initiation of a DOAC while taking amiodarone, which was greater than that observed for DOAC monotherapy (OR 1.30; 99% CI 1.25-1.35). Similar findings were observed for cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality respectively with diltiazem. CONCLUSION: Our study showed no evidence of higher bleeding or cardiovascular risk associated with co-prescribed DOACs and amiodarone, diltiazem, or verapamil. Elevated risks of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality were only observed during DOAC initiation when diltiazem/amiodarone were being taken.

Time-in-therapeutic-range defined warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: a Nationwide Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Little is known how individual time-in-therapeutic-range (TTR) impacts the effectiveness and safety of warfarin therapy compared to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of standard dose DOACs to warfarin in patients with AF, while categorizing warfarin treated patients into quartiles based on their individual TTR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a nationwide study including all patients with new-onset AF between 2011 and 2018 in Finland. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using Cox regression analysis with the inverse probability of treatment weighted method to assess the risks of ischaemic stroke (IS), intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) and mortality for users of apixaban (n = 12,426), dabigatran (n = 4545), rivaroxaban (n = 12,950) and warfarin (n = 43,548). RESULTS: The median TTR for warfarin users was 72%. Compared to the second best TTR quartile (reference), the risk of IS was higher in the two poorest TTR quartiles, and lower in the best TTR quartile and on rivaroxaban [2.35 (95% confidence interval, 1.85-2.85), 1.44 (1.18-1.75), 0.60 (0.47-0.77) and 0.72 (0.56-0.92)]. These differences were non-significant for apixaban and dabigatran. HR of ICH was 6.38 (4.88-8.35) and 1.87 (1.41-2.49) in the two poorest TTR groups, 1.44 (1.02-1.93) on rivaroxaban, and 0.58 (0.40-0.85) in the best TTR group compared to the reference group. Mortality was higher in the two poorest TTR groups and lowest in the best TTR group. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome was unsatisfactory in the two lowest TTR quartiles - in half of the patients treated with warfarin. The differences between the high TTR groups and standard dose DOACs were absent or modest.

Feasibility of atezolizumab and bevacizumab combination regimens in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and lung cancer taking direct oral anticoagulants.

AIM: Atezolizumab and bevacizumab (Atezo/Bev) combination immunotherapy regimens and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are both associated with bleeding. Therefore, combining Atezo/Bev regimens with DOACs may exacerbate the bleeding risk. This study investigated the feasibility of the Atezo/Bev regimen in patients taking DOACs. METHODS: This retrospective study included 141 patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or advanced lung cancer (LC) treated with Atezo/Bev regimens. Patients who used antithrombotic agents other than DOACs were excluded. Bleeding events during the Atezo/Bev regimen were analyzed. RESULTS: The incidence rates of bleeding of any grade in the DOAC (n = 11) and no antithrombotic agent (NAA) (n = 130) groups were 9.1% and 10.8%, respectively, with no significant differences. Moreover, no significant difference was found in the frequency of bleeding of grade ≥3 between the DOAC and NAA groups. No patients in the DOAC group discontinued the Atezo/Bev regimen because of severe bleeding. Although serum albumin levels, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.298 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.105-0.847), independently contributed to bleeding events (p = 0.023), DOAC administration did not (HR: 1.357; 95% CI: 0.157-10.54; p = 0.770). Among only patients with HCC (n = 59), none of the five patients taking DOACs experienced bleeding events. A high albumin-bilirubin score (HR: 9.083, 95% CI: 1.118-73.76) was associated with bleeding events (p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: DOACs did not have a considerable effect on bleeding events in the Atezo/Bev regimens for HCC or LC. Under careful surveillance for bleeding, Atezo/Bev regimens may be feasible in patients receiving DOACs.

A Pilot Study Describing DOAC Level Results and Association With Clinical Outcomes.

Purpose: Describe direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) level ordering and interpretation practices in association with clinical outcomes at a vascular medicine clinic. Methods: This study was a retrospective, observational study including patients who had a DOAC level ordered and assessed while on DOAC therapy. The primary outcome was the proportion of DOAC levels within previously reported ranges. Secondary outcomes included thrombotic events, major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding events, and the proportion of DOAC level results which prompted a change in the therapeutic plan. Results: A total of 43 patients who had a DOAC level ordered while on DOAC therapy were included in the study. More patients were on apixaban than other DOACs, and the most common indication for anticoagulation was deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE). The most common reasons for ordering DOAC levels included history of gastric bypass (n = 20) and drug-drug interactions (n = 8). Most patients on apixaban had in-range levels (n = 24) compared to out of-range levels (5 patients). More patients on rivaroxaban had a level out-of-range (n = 10) than in-range (n = 4). One patient had a DVT, resulting in hospitalization and change in DOAC therapy. Two patients had bleeding events, with 1 hospitalization and change in DOAC therapy. DOAC level results also prompted changes in therapeutic plans for 9 of the patients. Conclusion: DOAC level results did not always correlate with expected outcomes, and further research is warranted to clarify which clinical situations may benefit from ordering DOAC levels.

Direct oral anticoagulants and venous malformations: literature review and retrospective study of 29 patients.

Background: Venous malformations (VMs) are commonly associated with localized intravascular coagulopathy leading to elevated D-dimer and risks of hemorrhagic and thromboembolic events, particularly in extensive lesions. While low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) has been effective in managing coagulopathy and pain, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) emerge as a promising alternative. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs in treating VMs associated with localized intravascular coagulopathy, offering a comparative perspective to LMWH. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 29 patients with VMs and secondary localized intravascular coagulopathy treated with DOACs between 2013 and 2023 in a single tertiary center specialized in vascular anomalies. Data were collected from February 24, 2023, to September 1, 2023. Results: Patients' median age was 40 years (range, 22-76 years), with a female predominance of 66%. Descriptive statistical analysis showed that 85% of patients experienced pain improvement, and 86% showed a reduction in D-dimer by at least 25%, with a mean reduction of 57% (SD, ±32%; IQR, [38-81%]). Additionally, 37% of patients reported a bleeding event, mostly minor. Conclusion: The study findings suggests that DOACs may serve as an alternative to LMWH for patients with VMs associated with pain management and reduced D-dimer, alongside a low observed risk of major bleeding. Tailored dosing considering the location of the malformation, bleeding and thrombotic tendencies, and laboratory abnormalities is recommended. Future studies with larger cohorts and extended follow-up are necessary for more conclusive evidence on DOACs' role in this patient population.

Evaluation of acute thrombus regression effect of edoxaban for deep vein thrombosis in patients with cancer: a single-center prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Although there are reports on the recurrence prevention in the chronic phase using direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients with cancer, acute thrombus regression effect using DOACs has not been assessed. This study aimed to assess the thrombus regression effect of initial treatment using edoxaban for acute lower-extremity DVT in patients with active cancer. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this observational study, among the inpatients with cancer and lower-extremity DVT who underwent initial treatment with edoxaban at our hospital from November 2019 to December 2021, 34 consenting patients were recruited in this study. The quantitative ultrasound thrombus (QUT) score of thrombus volume was calculated at baseline (before administration) and 7-14 days after the start of edoxaban administration, using lower-extremity venous ultrasound to evaluate changes in thrombus volume. The primary and secondary endpoints were the acute thrombus regression effect of edoxaban and the impact of patients' clinical frailty on the thrombus regression effect, respectively. Anticoagulant therapy with edoxaban significantly reduced QUT score (p < 0.001). In addition, regardless of the Clinical Frailty Scale scores, QUT score decreased significantly. CONCLUSION: Initial treatment with edoxaban was effective for lower-extremity DVT in patients with cancer. In addition, the effect was the same independent of the degree of frailty.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drug‒drug interactions in hospitalized older adults treated with direct oral anticoagulants.

PURPOSE: Polypharmacy is a frequent situation in older adults that increases the risk of drug-drug interactions (DDIs), both pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are frequently prescribed in older adults, mainly because of the high prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF). DOACs are subject to cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4)- and/or P-glycoprotein (P-gp)-mediated PK DDIs and PD DDIs when co-administered with drugs that interfere with platelet function. The aim of our study was to assess the prevalence of DDIs involving DOACs in older adults and the associated risk factors at admission and discharge. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in an acute geriatric unit between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2022, including patients over 75 years of age treated with DOACs at admission and/or discharge, for whom a comprehensive collection of co-medications was performed. RESULTS: From 909 hospitalizations collected, the prevalence of PK DDIs involving DOACs was 16.9% at admission and 20.7% at discharge, and the prevalence of PD DDIs was 20.7% at admission and 20.2% at discharge. Factors associated with DDIs were bleeding history [adjusted odds ratio (ORa) 1.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-2.68], number of drugs > 6 (ORa 2.54, 95% CI 1.88-3.46) and reduced dose of DOACs (ORa 0.39, 95% CI 0.28-0.54) at admission and age > 87 years (ORa 0.74, 95% CI 0.55-0.99), number of drugs > 6 (ORa 2.01, 95% CI 1.48-2.72) and reduced dose of DOACs (ORa 0.41, 95% CI 0.30-0.57) at discharge. CONCLUSION: This study provides an indication of the prevalence of DDIs as well as the profile of DDIs and patients treated with DOACs.

A Rare Case of Renal Vein Thrombosis Secondary to Oral Contraceptive Pills.

Renal vein thrombosis (RVT) is a common complication of nephrotic syndrome and renal malignancy. However, its association with oral contraceptive use has rarely been reported. We report a case of a 29-year-old female with a history of oral contraceptive use, presenting with acute flank pain. On further investigation, she was found to have unilateral RVT. Oral contraception was discontinued, and she was started on therapeutic anticoagulation, initially with low-molecular-weight heparin, and then switched to apixaban. Her symptoms improved, and she is currently doing well. This case signifies the importance of proper history-taking and how oral contraception should be considered a significant risk factor for venous thromboembolism.

Risk factors for postgastric endoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding in direct oral anticoagulant users.

OBJECTIVES: Bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric tumors in patients taking antithrombotic drugs, in particular direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), remains unresolved; therefore, we evaluated the risk factors for post-ESD bleeding and drug differences in patients taking DOACs. METHODS: We included 278 patients taking antithrombotic drugs who underwent gastric ESD between January 2017 and March 2022. Antithrombotic drugs were withdrawn following the 2017 guidelines (Appendix on anticoagulants including DOACs). To further clarify differences in antithrombotic agents' effects, the peri-cancerous mucosa in the resected specimen was pathologically evaluated according to the Updated Sydney System. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess the risk of post-ESD bleeding. RESULTS: The incidence of post-ESD bleeding in patients taking DOACs was 19.6% (10/51). Among patients taking antithrombotic drugs, DOACs were identified as a possible factor involved in post-ESD bleeding (odds ratio [OR] 4.92). Among patients taking DOACs, possible factors included resection length diameter ≥30 mm (OR 3.72), presence of neutrophil infiltration (OR 2.71), lesions occurring in the lower third of stomach (OR 2.34), and preoperative antiplatelet use (OR 2.22). Post-ESD bleeding by DOAC type was 25.0% of patients (4/16) receiving apixaban, in 20.0% (3/15) receiving edoxaban, in 21.4% (3/14) receiving rivaroxaban, and in none of those receiving dabigatran. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of DOACs was shown to be a possible factor involved in post-ESD bleeding, and risk factors for patients taking DOACs included neutrophil infiltration. The pharmacological differences in the effects of DOACs contributing to bleeding in gastric ulcers suggest comparatively less bleeding with dabigatran after ESD.

Understanding Antithrombotic Agents for Rehabilitation Therapy: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.

In rehabilitation medicine, attention must be paid to the medication. Among them, antithrombotic drugs are used for the initial treatment and secondary prevention of stroke, so as a basic knowledge, the pharmacological actions, characteristics, indications, and precautions for the use of antithrombotic drugs should be known. Antithrombotic agents are divided into antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants, and the appropriate antithrombotic agent is selected according to the main disease or condition. Antiplatelet agents include aspirin, clopidogrel, ticlopidine, prasugrel, ticagrelor, and cilostazol. Each antiplatelet agent has a different mechanism of action, characteristics, and indications, and should be prescribed with due consideration. Anticoagulants include heparin, synthetic Xa inhibitors, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), synthetic antithrombin agents, and warfarin. Knowledge of the mechanism of action, characteristics, and indications of each anticoagulant is necessary, as well as monitoring and dose adjustment. With regard to ischemic cerebrovascular disease (ICD) and antithrombotic agents, the first step is to classify cerebral infarction and to determine whether antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants should be used. Bleeding and recurrence prevention are important considerations in the selection of appropriate antithrombotic agents for the pathophysiology of ICD.

Effectiveness and safety in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients switching from warfarin to direct oral anticoagulants in US healthcare claims.

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of real-world studies examining the risks of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding (MB) among non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients switching from warfarin to a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). This retrospective study was conducted to compare the stroke/SE and MB risks between patients switched from warfarin to apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban in real-world clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study used data from four United States commercial claims databases from January 1, 2012 to June 30, 2019. The study population included NVAF patients initially treated with warfarin and switched to apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban within 90 days of their warfarin prescription ending. Patients were matched 1:1 between the DOACs in each database using propensity scores and then pooled for the final analysis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate the risk of stroke/SE and MB. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The final population consisted of 2,611 apixaban-dabigatran, 12,165 apixaban-rivaroxaban, and 2,672 dabigatran-rivaroxaban pairs. Apixaban vs. dabigatran was associated with a lower risk of stroke/SE (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39-0.96) and MB (HR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.50-0.91). Apixaban vs. rivaroxaban was associated with a similar risk of stroke/SE (HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.73-1.07) and a lower risk of MB (HR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.52-0.68). There was no significant difference in either risk between dabigatran and rivaroxaban. These results provide important insights into how the risks of stroke/SE and MB for NVAF patients vary when switching from warfarin to different DOACs.

Opportunities for de-escalation of aspirin therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation at high stroke risk receiving direct oral anticoagulants.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased risk of stroke that can be attenuated with newer anticoagulants, called direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Prior to the emergence of DOACs, warfarin or aspirin (ASA) were used for stroke prevention. Due to the increased risk of bleed with concomitant anticoagulation therapy, populations that may benefit from ASA therapy are becoming limited. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate ASA utilization in an outpatient setting for patients with AF at high risk of stroke receiving a DOAC. This was a retrospective study conducted through electronic health record extraction between 6/1/2021 and 5/31/2022. Patient characteristics and demographics, including CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were evaluated in adults 18 years and older with AF and an active DOAC prescription. The secondary objective was to evaluate what characteristics influence ASA use by using a multivariate logistical regression model. A total of 5716 patients were included in the study. There were 955 patients (16.7%) on ASA and 4761 (83.3%) patients not on aspirin. Of the 955 patients on ASA, 33% (n=315) did not have vascular disease. A total of 2289 patients had at least one vascular disease diagnosis. Of these patients, 28% (n=640) were on ASA and 72% (n=1649) were not on ASA. There were 142 patients with vascular disease that experienced a bleeding event with 36% (n=51) of patients on ASA. Patients on ASA had a higher average CHA2DS2-VASc score (4.02 versus 3.74) and HAS-BLED score (3.10 versus 2.35) than patients not on ASA, respectively. This study found about one-third of patients with documented ASA use had no documentation of vascular disease and an unclear pattern of use in patients with documented vascular disease, suggesting opportunities to de-escalate ASA in patients with AF on a DOAC.

Safety of DOACs in patients with Child-Pugh Class C cirrhosis and atrial fibrillation.

Background: Anticoagulation (AC) is used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) are safe in patients with AF without cirrhosis, they are hardly studied in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Our study evaluates the safety and outcomes of DOACs in patients with Child-Pugh class C cirrhosis (CPC). Methods: We queried TriNetX Database. Patients with CPC and AF were divided into three cohorts: patients on DOACs, no AC, and warfarin. Three study arms were created using a 1:1 propensity score matching system (PSM). Results: Totally 16 029 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of those, 20.2% (n = 3235) were on DOACs, 47.1% (n = 7552) were not on AC, and 32.7% (n = 5242) were on warfarin. First arm comparing AC versus no AC, a statistically significant benefit was identified in 3-year mortality risk (47% vs 71%, P < 0.0001) and transplant status (17% vs 5%, p < 0.0001) with AC. However, no significant difference was identified regarding intracranial hemorrhage and GI bleeding risk. Second arm comparing patients on DOACs versus no AC, we identified mortality benefit (40% vs 72%, P < 0.0001) and a higher transplant rate (9% vs 3.2%, P < 0.0001) with DOACs. Intracranial hemorrhage rates (6% vs 4%, P = 0.03) were higher in patients on DOACs. Third arm comparing patients on DOACs versus Warfarin, a statistically significant lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage (6.6% vs 8.7%, P = 0.004) and GI bleed (2% vs 2.4%, P < 0.0001) were identified in patients on DOACs. Conclusion: Anticoagulation is safe in patients with CPC with AF and may provide a mortality benefit. DOACs are a safer alternative to warfarin.

Incidence of intracranial bleeding in mild traumatic brain injury patients taking oral anticoagulants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the leading causes of disability and death worldwide. Most TBI cases occur in older people, because they are at a higher risk of accidental falling. As the population ages, the use of anticoagulants is increasing. Some serious complications of TBI, such as intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), may occur even in mild cases. According to the current guidelines regarding managing mild TBI patients, a CT head scan is recommended for all patients receiving anticoagulation. We aim to assess the incidence of ICH in patients with mild TBI taking oral anticoagulants. METHODS: Our systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklist. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024503086). Twenty-eight studies evaluating patients with a mild TBI from ten countries with a total sample size of 11,172, 5671 on DOACs, and 5501 on VKAs were included in our meta-analysis. RESULTS: The random-effects overall incidence of ICH among oral anticoagulated patients with mild TBI was calculated to be 9.4% [95% CI 7.2-12.1%, I2 = 89%]. The rates of immediate ICH for patients taking DOACs and VKAs were 6.4% and 10.5%, respectively. The overall rate of immediate ICH in anticoagulated mild TBI patients was 8.5% [95% CI 6.6-10.9%], with a high heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 88%). Furthermore, the rates of delayed ICH in patients with mild TBI taking DOACs and VKAs were 1.6% and 1.9%, respectively. The overall incidence of delayed ICH among oral anticoagulated mild TBI patients was 1.7% [95% CI 1-2.8%, I2 = 79%]. The overall rate of ICH among mild TBI patients taking DOAC was calculated to be 7.3% [95% CI 5.2-10.3%], with significant heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 79%). However, the overall ICH rate is higher in patients who take only VKAs 11.3% [95% CI 8.6-14.7%, I2 = 83%]. Patients on DOACs were at lower risk of ICH after mild TBI compared to patients on VKAs (OR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.48-0.86, p < 0.01, I2 = 28%). CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis confirms the need for performing brain CT scan in patients with mild TBI patients who receive oral anticoagulants before injury. Due to limited data, further multi-center, prospective studies are warranted to confirm the true incidence of traumatic ICH in patients on anticoagulants.