Efficacy and safety of PARPis combined with an ICIs for advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a single-arm meta-analysis.

Although the intervention for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients has improved and survival time has increased, the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs) and PARP inhibitors (Poly ADP-Ribose Polymerase inhibitors, PARPis) is still controversial. Previous studies revealed that the combined use of ICIs and PARPis led to increased antitumor activity. However, most of these combined regimens are nonrandomized controlled trials with small sample sizes. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICIs combined with PARPis in patients with advanced or metastatic TNBC. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were systematically searched. The results including the objective remission rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs), were subjected to further analysis. Four studies involving 110 subjects were included in this meta-analysis. The combined ORR and DCR were 23.6% and 53.6%, respectively; while the ORR and DCR of BRCAmut patients were 38.1% and 71.4%, respectively. The median PFS of the patients was 4.29 months. As for safety, the most common AEs were nausea (49.0%), anemia (44.3%) and fatigue (40.6%). Most of them were grade 1 or 2, and the incidence of adverse events ≥ III was obviously low. Except for anemia, the incidence of AEs ≥ III was < 10%. This meta-analysis revealed that the combination of ICIs and PARPis has good efficacy and safety for advanced or metastatic TNBC patients.

Efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with donafenib in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at ascertaining the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with donafenib versus HAIC alone in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Seventy HCC patients were enrolled for our study, and they were randomized by simple randomization using computer-generated random numbers into two groups: control group and observation group. Regular follow-up reviews were conducted to assess the efficacy of treatments. The levels of apoptotic factors, the levels of hepatic fibrosis indices, the levels of serum tumor vascular factors and tumor markers, and the occurrence of adverse reactions in the two groups were recorded and compared. RESULTS: Disease control rate, objective response rate, and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients in the observation group were higher in contrast to the control group. After 12 weeks of treatment, lower mRNA expression of c-mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor, telomerase, and Fas Ligand and higher mRNA expression of Fas and Caspase-3 were observed in HCC tissues of the observation group versus the control group (p < 0.05); lower detection values of serum laminin, hyaluronic acid, collage type IV, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, and alpha-fetal protein (AFP) were noted in HCC patients of the observation group in comparison to the control group (p < 0.05); there was no difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Donafenib combined with HAIC in the treatment of unresectable HCC patients can notably reduce serum AFP levels, improve hepatic fibrosis, enhance short-term efficacy, prolong PFS, and have a favorable safety profile.

Radiofrequency ablation combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for recurrent liver cancer.

BACKGROUND: The recurrence rate of liver cancer after surgery is high. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is an effective treatment for liver cancer; however, its efficacy in recurrent liver cancer remains unclear. AIM: To investigate the clinical effect of TACE combined with RFA in the treatment of recurrent liver cancer. METHODS: Ninety patients with recurrent liver cancer were divided into 2 groups according to treatment plan: Control (RFA alone); and experimental [TACE combined with RFA (TACE + RFA)]. The incidence of increased alanine aminotransferase levels, complications, and other indices were compared between the two groups before and after the procedures. RESULTS: One month after the procedures, the short-term efficacy rate and Karnofsky Performance Status scores of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P < 0.05). Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and total bilirubin levels were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05); The overall response rate was 82.22% and 66.67% in the experimental and control groups, respectively; The disease control rate was 93.33% and 82.22% in the experimental and control groups, respectively, the differences are statistically significant (P < 0.05). And there were no statistical differences in complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: TACE + RFA was effective for the treatment of recurrent liver cancer and significantly reduced AFP levels and improved various indices of liver function.

Seven oral traditional Chinese medicine combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis.

CONTEXT: Traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs) have emerged as potential adjuvant therapies to treat non-small cell lung cancer. More direct comparative studies must be conducted among various oral TCMs. OBJECTIVE: This network meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of seven oral TCMs combined with chemotherapy in treating NSCLC. METHODS: The analysis included Zilongjin, Banmao, Hongdoushan, Huachansu, Kanglaite, Xihuang, and Pingxiao TCMs. Randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from the following databases: China National Infrastructure, Wanfang, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to April 2023. Two researchers independently extracted data. RESULTS: Sixty-eight RCTs (5,099 patients) were included. Compared to chemotherapy, Banmao capsules [odds ratio (OR) = 2.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.96-3.69)] and Huachansu tablets [OR = 2.35, 95%CI (1.81, 3.05)] ranked in the top two in terms of increasing disease control rate. The two main TCMs to improve the objective response rate were Banmao capsules [OR = 3.49, 95%CI (2.17, 5.60)] and Zilongjin tablets [OR = 2.62, 95%CI (1.92, 3.57)]. Zilongjin tablets [OR = 3.47, 95%CI (2.14, 5.63)] and Huachansu tablets [OR = 3.30, 95%CI (1.65, 6.60)] were ranked as the top two in improving Karnofsky performance status. Hongdoushan capsules (SUCRA = 18.8%) and Banmao capsules (SUCRA = 19.8%) were the top two in reducing gastrointestinal toxicity. Zilongjin tablets (SUCRA = 18.9%) and Banmao capsules (SUCRA = 26.6%) were the top two to reduce liver and kidney toxicity. Hongdoushan capsules (SUCRA = 15.7%) and Huachansu tablets (SUCRA = 16.8%) ranked the top two in reducing thrombocytopenia. Banmao capsules (SUCRA = 14.3%) and Zilongjin tablets (SUCRA = 26.3%) were the top two decreasing leukopenia. CONCLUSIONS: Combining oral TCMs with platinum-based chemotherapy has shown superior efficacy compared to platinum-based chemotherapy alone in treating NSCLC.

Assessment of disease control rate and safety of sorafenib in targeted therapy for advanced liver cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The clinical efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with advanced liver cancer (ALC) were evaluated based on transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). METHODS: 92 patients with ALC admitted to our hospital from May 2020 to August 2022 were randomly rolled into a control (Ctrl) group and an observation (Obs) group, with 46 patients in each. Patients in the Ctrl group received TACE treatment, while those in the Obs group received sorafenib molecular targeted therapy (SMTT) on the basis of the treatment strategy in the Ctrl group (400 mg/dose, twice daily, followed by a 4-week follow-up observation). Clinical efficacy, disease control rate (DCR), survival time (ST), immune indicators (CD3+, CD4+, CD4+/CD8+), and adverse reactions (ARs) (including mild fatigue, liver pain, hand-foot syndrome (HFS), diarrhea, and fever) were compared for patients in different groups after different treatments. RESULTS: the DCR in the Obs group (90%) was greatly higher to that in the Ctrl group (78%), showing an obvious difference (P < 0.05). The median ST in the Obs group was obviously longer and the median disease progression time (DPT) was shorter, exhibiting great differences with those in the Ctrl group (P < 0.05). Moreover, no great difference was observed in laboratory indicators between patients in various groups (P > 0.05). After treatment, the Obs group exhibited better levels in all indicators. Furthermore, the incidence of ARs in the Obs group was lower and exhibited a sharp difference with that in the Ctrl group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: SMTT had demonstrated good efficacy in patients with ALC, improving the DCR, enhancing the immune response of the body, and reducing the incidence of ARs, thereby promoting the disease outcome. Therefore, it was a treatment method worthy of promotion and application.

Combined Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Score Is Associated With Chemotherapeutic Response and Predicts Prognosis in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a prognostic indicator for several malignancies, including pancreatic cancer. We developed a novel combined NLR score (cNLRS) based on baseline NLR and change in NLR after chemotherapy (ΔNLR), and examined its prognostic value and role in chemotherapeutic response in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study retrospectively assessed 210 advanced pancreatic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy between 2010 and 2021. The cNLRS was developed and its association with chemotherapeutic response and prognosis was investigated. RESULTS: The cNLRS consisted of baseline NLR ≥2.5 and ΔNLR ≥0, both of which were remained as independent poor predictors of prognosis adjusting for other traditional clinicopathological features. A high cNLRS served as an independent prognostic factor of reduced overall survival. Of note, the cNLRS was significantly associated with disease control rate and treatment duration not only in 1st line treatment but also in 2nd line treatment. CONCLUSION: The cNLRS established as a useful prognostic biomarker might be associated with chemotherapeutic response and could predict survival in advanced patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated with chemotherapy.

Single-agent metronomic versus weekly oral vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: The randomized Tempo Breast study.

INTRODUCTION: Single-agent oral vinorelbine is a standard of care for hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) that has progressed on endocrine therapy. Metronomic administration may offer a better balance of efficacy and safety than standard regimens, but data from previous trials are scarce. METHODS: In this open-label, multicenter, phase II trial, patients were randomized to oral vinorelbine administered on a metronomic (50 mg three times weekly) or weekly (60 mg/m2 in cycle 1, increasing to 80 mg/m2 if well tolerated) schedule. Treatment was continued until disease progression or intolerance. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR, the proportion of patients with a best overall confirmed response of CR, PR, or stable disease lasting 6 months or more). RESULTS: One-hundred sixty-three patients were randomized and treated. The DCR was 63.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 52.0-73.8) with metronomic vinorelbine and 72.8% (95% CI: 61.8-82.1) with weekly vinorelbine. Weekly vinorelbine was also associated with longer progression-free survival (5.6 vs 4.0 months) and overall survival (26.7 vs 22.3 months) than metronomic vinorelbine, but was associated with more adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized phase II trial, single-agent metronomic oral vinorelbine was effective and well tolerated as first-line chemotherapy for patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative ABC. Formal comparisons are not done in this phase II study and one can simply observe that confidence intervals of all endpoints overlap. When deciding for a chemotherapy after failure of endocrine therapy and CDK 4/6 inhibitors, oral vinorelbine might be an option to be given with either schedule. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT 2014-003860-19.

Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Prognostic Factors in Patients With Advanced-Stage Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Following the Administration of Capsule Formulation of the Standardized Extract of Atractylodes lancea (Thunb) DC.

BACKGROUND: A statistical model is essential in determining the appropriate predictive indicators for therapies in many types of cancers. Predictors have been compared favorably to the traditional systems for many cancers. Thus, this study has been proposed as a new standard approach. A recent study on the clinical efficacy of Atractylodes lancea (Thunb) DC. (AL) revealed the higher clinical benefits in patients with advanced-stage intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) treated with AL compared with standard supportive care. We investigated the relationships between clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetic parameters of serum bioactivity of AL and its active constituent atractylodin and determined therapeutic ranges. METHODS: Group 1 of advanced-stage ICC patients received daily doses of 1000 mg of standardized extract of the capsule formulation of AL (CMC-AL) for 90 days. Group 2 received daily doses of 1000 mg of CMC-AL for 14 days, followed by 1500 mg for 14 days, and 2000 mg for 62 days. Group 3 (control group) received palliative care. Cox proportional hazard model and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) were applied to determine the cut-off values of AUC0-inf, Cmax, and Cavg associated with therapeutic outcomes. Number needed to treat (NNT) and relative risk (RR) were also applied to determine potential predictors. RESULTS: The AUC0-inf of total AL bioactivity of >96.71 µg hour/ml was identified as a promising predictor of disease prognosis, that is, progression-free survival (PFS) and disease control rate (DCR). Cmax of total AL bioactivity of >21.42 was identified as a predictor of the prognosis of survival. The therapeutic range of total AL bioactivity for PFS and DCR is 14.48 to 65.8 µg/ml, and for overall survival is 10.97 to 65.8 µg/ml. Conclusions: The predictors of ICC disease prognosis were established based on the pharmacokinetics of total AL bioactivity. The information could be exploited to improve the clinical efficacy of AL in patients with advanced-stage ICC. These predictors will be validated in a phase 2B clinical study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: TCTR20210129007 (TCTR: www.clinicaltrials.in.th).

Correlation of Baseline Tumor Burden with Clinical Outcome in Melanoma Patients Treated with Ipilimumab.

INTRODUCTION: Tumor burden is a frequently mentioned parameter; however, a commonly accepted definition is still lacking. METHODS: In this double-center prospective and retrospective study, 76 patients with unresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma treated with ipilimumab were included. We defined the baseline tumor burden (BTB) as the global sum of all metastases' longest diameters before treatment started and correlated the calculated BTB with disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and with the baseline levels of LDH, S100B, and sULPB2. RESULTS: BTB correlated significantly with DCR (p = 0.009), PFS (p = 0.002), OS (p = 0.032), and the occurrence of NRAS mutation (p = 0.006). BTB was also correlated to baseline serum levels of LDH (p = 0.011), S100B (p = 0.027), and SULBP (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that BPB and LDH were independently correlated with PFS and OS. With increasing BTB, disease control was less likely; no patient with a BTB >200 mm achieved disease control. For patients with brain metastasis, no correlation of BTB with DCR (p = 0.251), PFS (p = 0.059), or OS (p = 0.981) was observed. CONCLUSION: Calculated BTB is an independent prognostic factor for patients with metastatic melanoma treated with ipilimumab. Using calculated BTB as a definition of tumor burden may help increase comparability of outcome of therapies in future studies.

Efficacy of cinobufacini capsule combined with docetaxel plus cisplatin chemotherapy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer / 基础医学与临床

Objective To investigate the impacts of cinobufotalin combined with docetaxel+cisplatin chemotherapy on the disease control and the level of vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF)in serum of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Methods Totally 70 patients with non-small cell lung cancer admitted to Zhejiang Veteran Hospital from March 2019 to March 2022 were included.They were randomly divided into combination group(cinobufotalin combined with docetaxel+cisplatin,n= 35)and control group(docetaxel+cisplatin chemotherapy alone,n=35).The disease control rates of two groups,serum VEGF level,carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA),cy-tokeratin 19(CK19)and carbohydrate antigen 125(CA125)were measured using ELISA;life quality of patients was evaluated with the KPS score;The adverse events between two groups were compared.Results The disease control rate in the combination group(33/35,94.29％)was higher than that that of control group(25/35,71.43％,)(P＜0.05).After treatment,the level of VEGF in both groups of patients decreased,and the KPS score increased(P＜0.05)especially in the combination group(P＜0.05).After treatment,the level of serum CEA,CA125,and CK19 of control group and combination group were obviously lower than those before treatment(P＜0.05),while those in the combination group were even lower(P＜0.05).The incidence of adverse events in the combination group(5/35,14.29％)was lower than that in the control group(13/35,37.14％)(P＜0.05).Conclusions Cinobufotalin combined with docetaxel+cisplatin chemotherapy as a potential new chemotherapy significantly reduces the level of VEGF and tumor biomarkers in serum factor,improves the life quality of patients.The combined therapy is proved tobe safe.

RC48-ADC treatment for patients with HER2-expressing locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors: a real-world study.

BACKGROUND: RC48-antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) link humanized anti-HER2 immunoglobulin with monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE). Clinical trials suggest promising antitumor activity in HER2-expressing solid tumors. This study probes RC48-ADC's efficacy and safety in patients with HER2-expressing advanced or metastatic solid tumors. METHOD: Data was collected from 23 advanced cancer patients treated with RC48-ADC at our oncology center between July 2021 and December 2022. These patients exhibited at least 1 + expression of HER2 immunohistochemistry, had previously experienced at least one failed systemic chemotherapy, and were treated with RC48-ADC until the occurrence of intolerable adverse reactions or disease progression. The primary endpoint was the disease control rate (DCR), and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. RESULTS: 23 of 25 screened patients received RC48 treatment. The ORR was 43.5% (95% CI, 23.2-63.7%) with a median PFS of 6.0 months (95% CI, 4.8-7.4). In the low-to-medium HER2 expression subgroup, ORR was 37.5%, median PFS 5.75 months. In the high HER2 expression subgroup, ORR was 57.1%, median PFS 7 months. For the cohort combining RC48 with PD-1 inhibitors, ORR was 53.8%, median PFS 8 months. In the concurrent local radiation therapy subgroup, ORR was 40.0%, median PFS 6.0 months. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were anemia (60.8%), leukopenia (56.2%), raised transaminases (52.17%), and neutropenia (43.5%). Five patients (21.7%) experienced Grade 3 symptoms, including anemia (21.7%) and neutropenia (14.0%). No Grade 4 adverse reactions or deaths were reported. CONCLUSION: RC48-ADC shows promising efficacy and manageable safety in HER2-expressing advanced or metastatic solid tumor patients.

Associations Between Immune-Related Venous Thromboembolism and Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

This study aims to summarize the available data and determine if the presence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) immune-related adverse event (irAE) in patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is associated with improved treatment efficacy and clinical outcomes, which in turn was used to help optimize patient selection for anticoagulation therapy and inform rational treatment strategies for overcoming the mechanisms of ICI resistance. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched up to March 18, 2023, for studies assessing the relationship between VTE irAE development during ICI therapy and cancer outcomes. Seven primary articles with a total of 4437 patients were included in the overall survival (OS) meta-analysis. Patients with VTE had a significant increase in overall mortality compared to patients without VTE in adjusted hazard ratios (HRs 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.75, P = .02). In the studies where immortal time bias (ITB) was accounted for, patients with VTE irAE also had poor OS than those without. HR and the corresponding 95% CI values in the non-ITB group were 2.53 (1.75-3.66, P < .00001) with low heterogeneity (P = .17, I2 = 48%) and 1.21 (1.06-1.37, P = .004) in the ITB group with no heterogeneity (P = .95, I2 = 0%), respectively. Despite the heterogeneity identified, the evidence does suggest that VTE irAE occurrence could be served as a prognostic indicator, with higher frequencies of occurrence associated with poorer OS. However, the fundamental role of this association with clinical consequences should be further investigated in large cohorts and clinical trials.

Drug-eluting beads bronchial arterial chemoembolization vs. conventional bronchial arterial chemoembolization in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness and safety of drug-eluting bead bronchial artery chemoembolization (DEB-BACE) with conventional bronchial artery chemoembolization (cBACE) and provide a novel treatment option for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Patients with advanced NSCLC underwent DEB-BACE or cBACE and were screened retrospectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the primary outcome indicators, while technical success rate, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs) were the secondary ones. Results: A total of 41 patients were enrolled in the study, 12 in the DEB-BACE group and 29 in the cBACE group, according to the treatment regimen. No patient achieved complete response. Eighteen patients achieved partial response (9 in each group), 15 patients achieved stable disease (3 in the DEB-BACE group and 12 in the cBACE group), and eight patients achieved progressive disease (all in the cBACE group) when treated for 2 months. The overall ORR and DCR were 43.9% (18/41) and 80.5% (33/41), respectively. ORR and DCR in the DEB-BACE group were 50.0% (9/12) and 100.0% (12/12), respectively, while ORR and DCR in the cBACE group were 31.0% (9/29) and 72.4% (21/29), respectively. Compared to cBACE, the ORR and DCR of DEB-BACE were significantly improved (p < 0.05). The median PFS was better in the DEB-BACE group than in the cBACE group (6.95 months vs. 3.20 months, respectively, Hazard Ratio [HR] = 0.416; p = 0.005). Furthermore, the median OS was significantly better in the DEB-BACE group than in the cBACE group (28.5 months vs. 22.5 months, respectively, HR = 0.316; p = 0.020). Conclusion: DEB-BACE has a good safety and therapeutic profile in advanced NSCLC and is superior to cBACE. DEB-BACE can be used as an alternative treatment option for advanced NSCLC, even in elderly patients.

Optimal Dosing and Patient Selection for Electrochemotherapy in Solid Abdominal Organ and Bone Tumors.

The primary aim of this study was to analyze studies that use electrochemotherapy (ECT) in "deep-seated" tumors in solid organs (liver, kidney, bone metastasis, pancreas, and abdomen) and understand the similarities between patient selection, oncologic selection, and use of new procedures and technology across the organ systems to assess response rates. A literature search was conducted using the term "Electrochemotherapy" in the title field using publications from 2017 to 2023. After factoring in inclusion and exclusion criteria, 29 studies were analyzed and graded based on quality in full. The authors determined key patient and oncologic selection characteristics and ECT technology employed across organ systems that yielded overall responses, complete responses, and partial responses of the treated tumor. It was determined that key selection factors included: the ability to be administered bleomycin, life expectancy greater than three months, unrespectability of the lesion being treated, and a later stage, more advanced cancer. Regarding oncologic selection, all patient cohorts had received chemotherapy or surgery previously but had disease recurrence, making ECT the only option for further treatment. Lastly, in terms of the use of technology, the authors found that studies with better response rates used the ClinporatorTM and updated procedural guidelines by SOP. Thus, by considering patient, oncologic, and technology selection, ECT can be further improved in treating lesions in solid organs.

Real-World Experience of Metronomic Chemotherapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Results of a Retrospective Unicenter Study.

Introduction: Metronomic chemotherapy (MCT) is increasingly used in oncology due to its favorable therapeutic index. There is still a lack of evidence for MCT in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In this retrospective unicenter study, we demonstrated real-word data on MCT in MBC. Methods: MBC patients who received metronomic oral cyclophosphamide (CTX) (50 mg daily) and methotrexate (MTX) (2.5 mg every other day), CTX and capecitabine (CAPE) (500 mg thrice daily), CTX, or vinorelbine (VRL) (30 mg daily) alone for at least 4 weeks between 2009 and 2021 were included. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR) ≥24 weeks. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patient characteristics and therapy response were analyzed using χ2 test. For survival analyses, Kaplan-Meier estimator and log-rank test were used. Results: Seventy-two patients were identified. Sixty-two patients received CTX/MTX, three CTX/CAPE, two CTX, and five VRL. Median age at diagnosis MBC and at start of MCT was 59.0 years and 64.5 years, respectively. 72.2% tumors were hormone receptor positive and 27.8% were triple-negative. 54.2% patients had more than two different metastases. 80.6% patients showed visceral involvement. 31.9% patients achieved DCR ≥24 weeks. Median PFS was 17.0 weeks (95% CI 14.5-19.5) and median OS was 58.0 weeks (95% CI 29.0-87.0). MCT showed similar DCR ≥24 weeks and clinically meaningful but not statistically significant shorter median PFS compared to prior therapy (31.9% versus 32.8% [p = 0.570] and 17.0 weeks versus 20.0 weeks [p = 0.093], respectively) and statistically significant higher DCR ≥24 weeks and longer median PFS compared to subsequent therapy (31.9% versus 17.4% [p = 0.038] and 17.0 weeks versus 12.0 weeks [p = 0.006], respectively). Three (4.2%) patients terminated MCT because of toxicity. Conclusion: In this real-world retrospective study, MCT was effective and well tolerated and may thus represent a valuable treatment option in selected MBC patients.

The efficacy and safety of apatinib in patients with heavily pretreated end-stage cancer: a retrospective study.

Background: Anti-angiogenesis therapy has been a vital treatment option in a variety of cancers. Assessing the efficacy and safety of apatinib in patients with heavily pretreated end-stage cancer is essential. Methods: Thirty patients with end-stage cancer who were heavily pretreated were enrolled in this study. All patients received oral administration of apatinib (125-500 mg/d) between May 2015 and November 2016. Dose reduction or elevation was conducted based on adverse events and doctors' judgments. Results: Prior to the apatinib treatment, the enrolled patients received a median of 1.2 surgeries (range, 0-7), 1.6 sessions of radiotherapies (range, 0-6), and 10.2 cycles of chemotherapy (range, 0-60); 43.3% of patients had uncontrolled local lesions, 83.3% of patients had uncontrolled multiple metastases, and 30.0% of patients had both. After the treatment, 25 patients had valuable data, 6 (24.0%) patients achieved partial response (PR), and 12 (48.0%) patients had stable disease (SD). The disease control rate (DCR) was 72.0%. The PR and SD rates were 20.0% and 40.0%, respectively, and the DCR was 60.0% in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Meanwhile, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.6 (range, 0.7-5.4) months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 3.8 (range, 1.0-12.0) months. Furthermore, the PR rate and DCR in patients with squamous cell cancer (SCC) were 45.5% and 81.8%, respectively; those in patients with adenocarcinoma (ADC) were 8.3% and 58.3%, respectively. The adverse events were generally mild. The most common adverse events were hyperbilirubinemia (53.3%), elevated transaminase (36.7%), anemia (30.0%), thrombocytopenia (30.0%), hematuria (30.0%), fatigue (26.7%), and leukopenia (20.0%). Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate the efficacy and safety of apatinib and support the further development of apatinib as a potential treatment option for patients with heavily pretreated end-stage cancer.

Objective response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in NRAS-mutant melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: NRAS mutations are common in melanoma and confer a worse prognosis. Although most patients with metastatic melanoma receive immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the impact of NRAS mutational status on their efficacy remains under debate. Methods: We performed a comprehensive literature search across several large databases. Inclusion criteria were trials, cohorts, and large case series that analyzed the primary outcome of objective response rate by NRAS mutational status in patients with melanoma treated with any line of ICI. At least two reviewers independently screened studies using Covidence software, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Standard meta-analysis was performed in R with sensitivity analysis and tests for bias. Results: Data on 1770 patients from ten articles were pooled for meta-analysis, and the objective response rate to ICIs was calculated to compare NRAS-mutant and NRAS-wildtype melanoma. The objective response rate was 1.28 (95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.64). Sensitivity analysis identified the study by Dupuis et al. with influential impact on the pooled effect size and heterogeneity, favoring NRAS-mutant melanoma. Discussion: In this meta-analysis evaluating the impact of NRAS mutational status on objective response to ICIs in metastatic melanoma, NRAS-mutant cutaneous melanoma demonstrated an increased likelihood of partial or complete tumor response, relative to NRAS-wildtype cutaneous melanoma. Genomic screening for NRAS mutations in patients with metastatic melanoma may improve predictive ability when initiating ICIs.

Comparison of gefitinib plus chemotherapy versus gefitinib alone for advanced non­small­cell lung cancer: A meta analysis.

This study aimed to perform a meta­analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of gefitinib in combination with chemotherapy versus gefitinib alone in patients with advanced Non­Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). We searched databases for clinical studies that reported the efficacy or safety of gefitinib plus chemotherapy in comparison with gefitinib alone. Raw data from included studies were extracted and pooled to calculate the Odds Ratio (OR) for Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Disease Control Rate (DCR), the Hazard Ratio (HR) for Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS), and OR for complication ≥ Grade 3. A total of 10 studies containing 1,528 patients with NSCLC were identified and included in the analysis. Gefitinib plus chemotherapy showed significantly better efficacy in improving ORR (OR = 1.54; 95% CI [Confidence Interval], 1.13‒2.1; p = 0.006), DCR (OR = 1.62; 95% CI 1.14‒2.29; p = 0.007), PFS (HR=1.67; 95% CI 1.45‒1.94; p < 0.001) and OS (HR = 1.49; 95% CI 1.2‒1.87; p < 0.001) as compared with gefitinib alone. Consistent results were observed in the sub-population with positive EGFR mutation. The combination of gefitinib with chemotherapy had a significantly higher risk of complication (≥ Grade 3) with an OR of 3.29 (95% CI 2.57‒4.21; p < 0.001). The findings in the present study suggest that the combination of gefitinib with chemotherapy can provide better disease response and survival outcomes for patients with advanced NSCLC.

Efficacy and Safety of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors have been increasingly employed for the treatment of various cancers in clinical practice. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and Abstracts of American Society of Clinical Oncology proceedings databases were searched. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (PFS), median overall survival (OS), and incidence of adverse events (AEs) and drug withdrawal were pooled. Odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR) were calculated to analyze the difference in the ORR, DCR, PFS, and OS between groups. RESULTS: Among the 14,902 initially identified papers, 98 studies regarding use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced HCC were included. Based on different criteria of response in solid tumors, the pooled ORR, DCR, and median PFS was 16-36%, 54-74%, and 4.5-6.8 months, respectively. The pooled median OS was 11.9 months. Compared to multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors monotherapy significantly increased ORR (OR 2.73, P < 0.00001) and OS (HR 0.97, P = 0.05), and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with TKIs significantly increased ORR (OR 3.17, P < 0.00001), DCR (OR 2.44, P < 0.00001), PFS (HR 0.58, P < 0.00001), and OS (HR 0.58, P < 0.00001). The pooled incidence of all-grade AEs, grade ≥ 3 AEs, and drug withdrawal was 71%, 25%, and 7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: On the basis of the present systematic review and meta-analysis, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors should be the preferred treatment choice for advanced HCC owing to their higher antitumor effect and improved outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy regimens containing taxanes for first-line treatment in advanced gastric cancer.

Gastric cancer is a very common gastrointestinal malignancy. Since the disease is often asymptomatic in its early stage, it is often diagnosed in its late stage. In this study, our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy regimens containing taxanes in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We searched published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the effect of taxanes combined with basic chemotherapy and chemotherapy without taxanes on AGC. The extracted data are the number of people who achieved the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR), as well as the hazard ratio (HR) of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) including their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Six RCTs involving 2263 patients were included. Compared with chemotherapy without taxanes, patients receiving taxanes combined with basic chemotherapy had significantly longer PFS (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61-0.88, p = 0.001) and significantly longer OS (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69-0.93, p = 0.003); significantly better ORR (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.15-1.57, p = 0.0001) and significantly better DCR (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.08-1.33, p = 0.001). However, in patients treated with taxanes combined with basic chemotherapy, diarrhea, leukopenia and neutropenia were significantly increased (p < 0.05). In summary, taxanes combined with basic chemotherapy are superior to chemotherapy without taxanes in first-line treatment of AGC patients.