Stress testing the Centiloid: Precision and variability of PET quantification of amyloid pathology.

INTRODUCTION: Assessing the potential sources of bias and variability of the Centiloid (CL) scale is fundamental for its appropriate clinical application. METHODS: We included 533 participants from AMYloid imaging to Prevent Alzheimer's Disease (AMYPAD DPMS) and Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohorts. Thirty-two CL pipelines were created using different combinations of reference region (RR), RR and target types, and quantification spaces. Generalized estimating equations stratified by amyloid positivity were used to assess the impact of the quantification pipeline, radiotracer, age, brain atrophy, and harmonization status on CL. RESULTS: RR selection and RR type impact CL the most, particularly in amyloid-negative individuals. The standard CL pipeline with the whole cerebellum as RR is robust against brain atrophy and differences in image resolution, with 95% confidence intervals below ± 3.95 CL for amyloid beta positivity cutoffs (CL < 24). DISCUSSION: The standard CL pipeline is recommended for most scenarios. Confidence intervals should be considered when operationalizing CL cutoffs in clinical and research settings. HIGHLIGHTS: We developed a framework for evaluating Centiloid (CL) variability to different factors. Reference region selection and delineation had the highest impact on CL values. Whole cerebellum (WCB) and whole cerebellum plus brainstem (WCB+BSTM) as reference regions yielded consistent results across tracers. The standard CL pipeline is robust against atrophy and image resolution variation. Estimated within- and between-pipeline variability (95% confidence interval) in absolute CL units.

Corticosteroid-depending effects on peripheral immune cell subsets vary according to disease modifying strategies in multiple sclerosis.

Background: The primary treatment for acute relapses in multiple sclerosis (MS) is the intravenous administration of high-dose methylprednisolone (IVMP). However, the mechanisms through which corticosteroid treatment impacts acute neuroinflammation in people with MS (pwMS) remain not fully understood. In particular, the changes induced by glucocorticoids (GCs) on cells of the innate immune system and the differences between patients with distinct immunotherapies have received little attention to date. Methods: We conducted immunophenotyping using flow cytometry on peripheral blood mononuclear cells of pwMS who received IVMP treatment during a relapse. We compared the impact of an IVMP treatment on a broad variety of immune cell subsets within three groups: twelve patients who were treatment-naïve to disease modifying therapies (wDMT) to ten patients on platform therapies (PT) and eighteen patients on fingolimod therapy (FTY). Results: We observed pronounced interindividual short- and intermediate-term effects of IVMP on distinct immune cells subsets. In addition to the well-documented decrease in T-helper cells (Th cells), we detected significant alterations after the first IVMP infusion within the innate immune response among neutrophil, eosinophil and basophil granulocytes, monocytes and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs). When comparing patients wDMT to the PT and FTY cohorts, we found that IVMP had a similar impact on innate immune cells across all treatment groups. However, we did not observe a significant further decline in T lymphocyte counts during IVMP in patients with pre-existing lymphopenia under FTY treatment. Although T cell apoptosis is considered the main mechanism of action of GCs, patients with FTY still reported symptom improvement following IVMP treatment. Conclusion: In addition to T cell suppression, our data suggests that further immunoregulatory mechanisms of GC, particularly on cells of the innate immune response, are of greater significance than previously understood. Due to the regulation of the adaptive immune cells by DMTs, the impact of GC on these cells varies depending on the underlying DMT. Additional studies involving larger cohorts and cerebrospinal fluid samples are necessary to gain a deeper understanding of the immune response to GC in pwMS with different DMTs during relapse to define and explain differences in clinical response profiles.

Decisional Conflict Regarding Disease-Modifying Treatment Choices Among Patients with Mid-Stage Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.

Purpose: Shared decision-making is critical in multiple sclerosis (MS) due to the uncertainty of the disease trajectory over time and the large number of treatment options with differing efficacy, safety and administration characteristics. The aim of this study was to assess patients' decisional conflict regarding the choice of a disease-modifying therapy and its associated factors in patients with mid-stage relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Methods: A multicenter, non-interventional study was conducted. Adult patients with a diagnosis of RRMS (2017 revised McDonald criteria) and disease duration of 3 to 8 years were included. The level of uncertainty experienced by a patient when faced with making a treatment choice was assessed using the 4-item Decisional Conflict Scale. A battery of patient-reported and clinician-rated measures was administered to obtain information on symptom severity, illness perception, illness-related uncertainty, regret, MS knowledge, risk taking behavior, preferred role in the decision-making process, cognition, and self-management. Patients were recruited during routine follow-up visits and completed all questionnaires online using electronic tablets at the hospital. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted. Results: A total of 201 patients were studied. Mean age (Standard deviation) was 38.7 (8.4) years and 74.1% were female. Median disease duration (Interquartile range) was 6.0 (4.0-7.0) years. Median EDSS score was 1.0 (0-2.0). Sixty-seven (33.3%) patients reported a decisional conflict. These patients had lower MS knowledge and more illness uncertainty, anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, subjective symptom severity, a threatening illness perception, and poorer quality of life than their counterparts. Lack of decisional conflict was associated with MS knowledge (Odds ratio [OR]=1.195, 95% CI 1.045, 1.383, p=0.013), self-management (OR=1.049, 95% CI 1.013, 1.093, p=0.018), and regret after a healthcare decision (OR=0.860, 95% CI 0.756, 0.973, p=0.018) in the multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Decisional conflict regarding the selection of a disease-modifying therapy was a common phenomenon in patients with mid-stage RRMS. Identifying factors associated with decisional conflict may be useful to implement preventive strategies that help patients better understand their condition and strengthen their self-management resources.

Navigating the future of Alzheimer's care in Ireland - a service model for disease-modifying therapies in small and medium-sized healthcare systems.

BACKGROUND: A new class of antibody-based drug therapy with the potential for disease modification is now available for Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the complexity of drug eligibility, administration, cost, and safety of such disease modifying therapies (DMTs) necessitates adopting new treatment and care pathways. A working group was convened in Ireland to consider the implications of, and health system readiness for, DMTs for AD, and to describe a service model for the detection, diagnosis, and management of early AD in the Irish context, providing a template for similar small-medium sized healthcare systems. METHODS: A series of facilitated workshops with a multidisciplinary working group, including Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) members, were undertaken. This informed a series of recommendations for the implementation of new DMTs using an evidence-based conceptual framework for health system readiness based on [1] material resources and structures and [2] human and institutional relationships, values, and norms. RESULTS: We describe a hub-and-spoke model, which utilises the existing dementia care ecosystem as outlined in Ireland's Model of Care for Dementia, with Regional Specialist Memory Services (RSMS) acting as central hubs and Memory Assessment and Support Services (MASS) functioning as spokes for less central areas. We provide criteria for DMT referral, eligibility, administration, and ongoing monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare systems worldwide are acknowledging the need for advanced clinical pathways for AD, driven by better diagnostics and the emergence of DMTs. Despite facing significant challenges in integrating DMTs into existing care models, the potential for overcoming challenges exists through increased funding, resources, and the development of a structured national treatment network, as proposed in Ireland's Model of Care for Dementia. This approach offers a replicable blueprint for other healthcare systems with similar scale and complexity.

Altered lymphocyte profiles and herpes zoster infections in patients with multiple sclerosis on natalizumab.

Cases of herpes zoster (HZ) in patients with MS on natalizumab (NTZ) have been documented. In this study, we assessed lymphocyte subsets in NTZ-treated patients with HZ compared to matched controls without HZ. Twenty unvaccinated patients developed HZ while on NTZ for an incidence rate of 12.3 per 1000 patient-years. These patients had lower CD8+% and higher CD4+:CD8+ ratios (p ⩽ 0.01) than non-HZ matched controls. Two patients with relapsing-remitting MS developed HZ twice while on NTZ. These findings underscore the importance of pre-NTZ HZ vaccination due to potential HZ risk.

Diroximel Fumarate in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: NEDA-3 After Re-Baselining in the Phase 3 EVOLVE-MS-1 Study.

INTRODUCTION: Diroximel fumarate (DRF) and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) are orally administered fumarate disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS). The safety, tolerability, and exploratory efficacy of DRF were evaluated in the phase 3 EVOLVE-MS-1 study. No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA-3) is a composite efficacy endpoint used in clinical trials for MS defined as no relapse, no 24-week confirmed disability progression (CDP), no new/newly enlarging T2 lesions, and no new gadolinium-enhancing lesions. As NEDA outcomes in studies may be confounded by initial disease activity, the objective of this analysis was to evaluate NEDA-3 in EVOLVE-MS-1 for newly enrolled patients and patients who were re-baselined after approximately 7 weeks. METHODS: Patients entered EVOLVE-MS-1 as either newly enrolled or having completed the 5-week phase 3 EVOLVE-MS-2 study of DRF and DMF. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was performed at baseline before each study (approx. 7 weeks apart) and at weeks 48 and 96 in EVOLVE-MS-1. Therefore, patients entering from EVOLVE-MS-2 were re-baselined after approximately 7 weeks. NEDA-3 outcomes on DRF are reported for prior DRF, prior DMF, and de novo patient groups. RESULTS: Of 1057 patients in EVOLVE-MS-1, 239 (22.6%) had rolled over from receiving DRF in EVOLVE-MS-2 ("prior DRF"), 225 (21.3%) had rolled over from receiving DMF in EVOLVE-MS-2 ("prior DMF"), and 593 (56.1%) were newly enrolled ("de novo"). At week 48, Kaplan-Meier estimates of NEDA-3 were 72.3% (prior DRF), 72.1% (prior DMF), and 62.1% (de novo); at week 96, estimates were 50.2% (prior DRF), 48.2% (prior DMF), and 36.5% (de novo). CONCLUSIONS: In EVOLVE-MS-1, after re-baselining at approximately 7 weeks, approximately half of DRF-treated patients achieved NEDA-3 at week 96, compared with 36.5% of patients who were not re-baselined. Re-baselining may be useful for assessing efficacy of DMTs by mitigating the influence of disease activity prior to the onset of efficacy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: NCT03093324 (EVOLVE-MS-2); NCT02634307 (EVOLVE-MS-1).

BACE1 Inhibitors for Alzheimer's Disease: Current Challenges and Future Perspectives.

Disease-modifying therapies (DMT) for Alzheimer's disease (AD) are highly longed-for. In this quest, anti-amyloid therapies take center stage supported by genetic facts that highlight an imbalance between production and clearance of amyloid-ß peptide (Aß) in AD patients. Indeed, evidence from basic research, human genetic and biomarker studies, suggests the accumulation of Aß as a driver of AD pathogenesis and progression. The aspartic protease ß-site AßPP cleaving enzyme (BACE1) is the initiator for Aß production. Underpinning a critical role for BACE1 in AD pathophysiology are the elevated BACE1 concentration and activity observed in the brain and body fluids of AD patients. Therefore, BACE1 is a prime drug target for reducing Aß levels in early AD. Small-molecule BACE1 inhibitors have been extensively developed for the last 20 years. However, clinical trials with these molecules have been discontinued for futility or safety reasons. Most of the observed adverse side effects were due to other aspartic proteases cross-inhibition, including the homologue BACE2, and to mechanism-based toxicity since BACE1 has substrates with important roles for synaptic plasticity and synaptic homeostasis besides amyloid-ß protein precursor (AßPP). Despite these setbacks, BACE1 persists as a well-validated therapeutic target for which a specific inhibitor with high substrate selectivity may yet to be found. In this review we provide an overview of the evolution in BACE1 inhibitors design pinpointing the molecules that reached advanced phases of clinical trials and the liabilities that precluded adequate trial effects. Finally, we ponder on the challenges that anti-amyloid therapies must overcome to achieve clinical success.

Old and New Strategies in the Treatment of Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis: A Personal View for a New Treatment Approach.

Up to 10 years ago the most common approach to the treatment of pediatric MS (ped-MS) was to start with IFNB or GA (so-called first-line therapies or moderate-efficacy disease-modifying therapies [ME-DMTs]) and to switch to more aggressive treatments (or high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies [HE-DMTs]) in non-responder patients. The use of HE-DMTs as first choice was recommended in selected cases with an active, aggressive form of MS. Indications for the treatment of ped-MS were essentially derived from data of observational studies. Recently, results of three randomized clinical trials have been published as well as data from many observational studies evaluating the effect of new and more active DMTs, with clear evidence that HE-DMTs are more effective than ME-DMTs. Therefore, the paradigm of treatment for patients with MS onset before 18 years of age should be changed, offering treatment with HE-DMTs as first option, because of their superior effectiveness to prevent relapses and disease progression. HE-DMTs present an overall reassuring safety profile and obtain better adherence to treatment.

Patient-advocate-led global coalition adapting fit-for-purpose outcomes measures to assure meaningful inclusion of DEEs in clinical trials.

Existing clinical tools that measure non-seizure outcomes lack the range and granularity needed to capture skills in developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE)-affected individuals who also fall in the severe to profound range of intellectual disability. This effectively excludes those with severe impairments from clinical trials, impeding the ability of sponsors to evaluate disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). The Inchstone Project, an international, patient advocate-led collaboration, brings together leading researchers, clinicians, pharmaceutical companies, and advocates to develop an adapted, validated assessment battery within 5 years. The goal is to support trials of DMTs for the DEEs by providing sufficiently sensitive measurement tools to demonstrate therapeutic efficacy. An initial pilot study administered 7 established assessments to 10 individuals affected by SCN2A-DEE, identifying specific limitations of existing measures and areas for improvement. It was clear that most tools do not account for challenges throughout the DEE population, including vision impairments, significant motor impairments and profound intellectual disability, which need to be accounted for in creating a 'fit-for-purpose' battery for the DEE population. Several novel assessments, including two measures of responsivity developed for use in monitoring recovery after acquired brain injury as well as individualized Goal Attainment Scaling, showed promise in this group. The team also completed a DEE-wide survey with over 270 caregivers documenting their children's abilities and priorities for their improvement from new treatments. The Inchstone team is using this information to evaluate how existing tools might be updated to better capture what is most important to families and measure their child's small but important improvements over time. These efforts are building a coherent picture across multiple DEEs of what domains, or concepts of interest, have the greatest impact on most patients and families. The Inchstone team is on course to adapt non-seizure outcome measures that are (1) sufficiently sensitive to measure small increments of meaningful change ('Inchstones') and (2) applicable to multiple DEE conditions.

DEE-P Connection's Inchstone project is adapting assessment tools to measure the smallest developmental changes in those affected by developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) - severe epilepsy and related developmental disorders. More sensitive measures will allow profoundly impacted individuals to be effectively included in clinical trials and result in better DEE treatments. Caregivers of children with DEEs understand firsthand that clinical tools intended to measure non-seizure outcomes, like communication and motor skills, were not designed for and don't work for their children. More sensitive tools are needed to measure the small changes that occur in DEEs. The limitations of existing measurement tools for DEEs have significant consequences: - Non-seizure responses to new therapies cannot be measured without tools designed specifically for individuals with severe to profound intellectual disability.- If a response cannot be measured in a trial, a potentially beneficial impact will be missed and a therapy, having failed to demonstrate an effect, may not gain regulatory approval.- DEE-affected individuals are less likely to benefit from the wave of new disease-modifying therapies providing hope for many other rare genetic diseases. DEE-P Connections, a patient advocacy organization supporting families caring for those severely affected by DEEs, launched The Inchstone Project to address this problem. This team science research collaborative unites researchers, pharmaceutical companies, advocates and others around a shared vision of adapting existing tools to reliably capture the small but important changes in skills in those severely affected by DEEs. To better understand these gaps, the Inchstone team conducted a pilot study with 10 children with SCN2A DEE. The team administered multiple assessments to explore how to adapt the tools to better capture the abilities and growth of this population. The team also completed a comprehensive DEE-wide survey with over 270 caregivers documenting their children's abilities and priorities for their improvement from new treatments, helping to document how existing tools may be updated to better capture what's most important to families and measure their children's small but important improvements over time. The Inchstone Project is on course to assure those profoundly impacted by DEEs are meaningfully included in clinical trials by establishing trusted and reliable non-seizure measurement tools.

Genetic counselling for at-risk family members with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis: data from a single-centre study.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary transthyretin-related amyloidosis is an autosomal dominant disorder. Recently, disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have been developed. For at-risk individuals, genetic analysis aids in the early administration of medical care; however, few studies have evaluated the current status of genetic counselling and management of presymptomatic carriers of amyloidogenic variants. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the medical records of 202 consecutive participants. RESULTS: A total of 103 clients who received genetic counselling for predictive testing were at-risk, and 83 underwent predictive testing. Genetic testing results were positive in 33 patients, 11 of whom had confirmed amyloid deposition and were administered DMTs. For presymptomatic V30M (p.V50M) carriers, 32.0 ± 2.4 years (median ± standard error) was the age when amyloid deposition was first identified (95% confidence interval 27.4-36.6). Serum transthyretin (TTR) levels decreased serially with an estimated slope of -1.2 mg/dL/year. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests the clinical utility of management using a combination of predictive testing and monitoring methods. Psychosocial support should be considered with collaboration between geneticists/genetic counsellors and psychologists. For a more optimised protocol for monitoring and designing future interventional trials in presymptomatic carriers, prospective cohort studies are necessary to clarify the natural history, particularly in the early stages of the disease.

Selection of disease modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis based on patient's age and disease activity: Data from a nationwide registry.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of the safety and efficacy of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in older patients with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS) is limited due to their exclusion from clinical trials. Our purpose is to evaluate the choice of DMTs in pwMS older than 50 years old in a real-world setting. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of pwMS from the Argentine MS and NMOSD Registry. We included patients under 35 and above 50 years old prescribed DMTs. Disease activity was categorized as highly active (HA) or not highly active (NHA), and DMTs were classified as low efficacy therapies (LET) or high efficacy therapies (HET). RESULTS: 1460 patients (65% females) were enrolled. The HA group comprised 241 patients, 198 young (82.2%) and 43 older (17.8%). The NHA group included 1219 patients, 893 young (73%) and 326 older (27%). In the NHA group, older patients received LET more frequently than younger patients (66% versus 44%; p < 0.01). In the HA group, older patients received LET in 61% of cases, whereas younger patients received HET in 71% (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The study shows the preference of LET in older patients regardless of disease activity. However it does not demonstrate a difference in disability in older patients based on low vs high efficacy DMTs used, probably due to the design of the study. Further longitudinal studies are warranted to address this issue.

The patient-reported wearing-off phenomenon with monoclonal antibody treatments for multiple sclerosis.

Background: Many patients report a wearing-off phenomenon with monoclonal antibody treatment for multiple sclerosis in which perceived benefits wear off before the next dose is due. Objectives: To determine prevalence of the wearing-off effect, symptoms experienced, impact on treatment satisfaction, and associated patient characteristics. Methods: Patients receiving natalizumab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, or rituximab at a tertiary multiple sclerosis center were invited to take an online survey interrogating their monoclonal antibody experience. Additional history and patient characteristic data were collected. Logistic regression was used to determine if patient characteristics predicted the wearing-off effect and linear regression to evaluate the impact of the wearing-off effect on treatment satisfaction. The models were adjusted for age, disease duration, race, sex, body mass index, education, and depression as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Results: We received 258 qualifying responses and 141 (54.7%) patients reported the wearing-off phenomenon. The most common symptom was fatigue (47.7%). Higher Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores were significantly associated with the wearing-off phenomenon (OR = 1.02, p = 0.005). The wearing-off effect (ß = -0.52, p = 0.04) and higher Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (ß = -0.09, p < 0.01) scores were associated with significantly reduced treatment satisfaction. Conclusion: The wearing-off phenomenon is common, associated with depression, and reduces treatment satisfaction. Research addressing mitigation strategies is needed.

Temporal and spatial patterns in the prescriptions of disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis. Results from the Italian Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders Register.

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic scenario in multiple sclerosis (MS) has evolved over recent years with the progressive introduction of new drugs focused to better balance efficacy, safety and management requirements. The objective of this study was to examine the prescribing patterns of disease-modifying therapies (DMT) over time and across different geographic areas, and the latency between disease onset, first Register center visit, disease diagnosis, and the start of treatment in a large cohort of persons with MS from the Italian Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders Register. METHODS: Up to 2022, the Register collected data from 124 centers on more than 78,000 persons, of whom 56,872 received at least one DMT prescription. Beside baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, we focused on DMT according to their efficacy distinguishing between moderate-efficacy (ME), or high-efficacy (HE). RESULTS: There was a higher probability of prescribing HE-DMT for increasing calendar years (multivariable odds ratio, OR=11.51 in 2021 or thereafter vs before 2000), in males (OR=1.08 vs females), patients with primary progressive with or without relapse (OR=3.00 vs clinically isolated syndrome), those with a higher Expanded Disability Status Scale score (OR=3.85 for >4 versus 0-1), and those from larger referral centers (OR=1.89 vs smaller ones). Conversely, higher age at onset was associated to a lower probability of prescribing HE-DMT (OR=0.74 at 40 or more vs <20 years). A trend to shorter times was observed in subsequent calendar years for disease onset, first center visit, diagnosis and first DMT prescription. No trend was detected based on the location of the geographic referral centers. The times between disease onset, first center visit, and diagnosis and the first DMT prescription showed significant decreases according to the year, while differences were less evident for the geographic areas. CONCLUSION: This study highlights some factors influencing the choice of HE-DMT, including aspects of both healthcare and clinical phenotype. The absence of a geographic pattern may indicate some homogeneity in DMT prescriptions across different Italian MS centers.

Long-term neuroprotective effects of natalizumab and fingolimod in multiple sclerosis: Evidence from real-world clinical data.

BACKGROUND: The long-term effect of high efficacy disease modifying therapy (DMT) on neurodegeneration in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) is largely unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effect of natalizumab (NTZ) or fingolimod (FTY) therapy on the evolution of brain atrophy compared to moderate efficacy DMT in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS: A total of 438 pwMS with 2,439 MRI exams during treatment were analyzed: 252 pwMS treated with moderate efficacy DMT, 130 with NTZ and 56 with FTY. Evolution of brain atrophy was analyzed over an average follow-up of 6.6 years after treatment initiation. Brain segmentation was performed on clinical 3D-FLAIRs using SynthSeg and regional brain volume changes over time were compared between the treatment groups. RESULTS: Total brain, white matter and deep gray matter atrophy rates did not differ between moderate efficacy DMTs, NTZ and FTY. Annualized ventricle growth rates were lower in pwMS treated with NTZ (1.1 %/year) compared with moderate efficacy DMT (2.4 %/year, p < 0.001) and similar to FTY (2.0 %/year, p = 0.051). Cortical atrophy rates were lower in NTZ (-0.08 %/year) compared with moderate efficacy DMT (-0.16 %/year, p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: In a real-world clinical setting, pwMS treated with NTZ had slower ventricular expansion and cortical atrophy compared to those treated with moderate efficacy DMT.

Challenges in Diagnosis and Therapeutic Strategies in Late-Onset Multiple Sclerosis.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory and degenerative demyelinating disease of the central nervous system of unknown etiology, which affects individuals in their early adulthood. However, nearly 5-10% of people with MS can be diagnosed at ages above 50 years old, referred to as late-onset multiple sclerosis (LOMS). Some studies have reported a distinctive presentation, clinical course, and prognosis for LOMS, implicating a different diagnostic and therapeutic approach for this population. Furthermore, similar manifestations between LOMS and other age-related conditions may lead to potential misdiagnosis and diagnostic delays, and a higher burden of multimorbidity associated with aging can further complicate the clinical picture. This review aims to explore the clinical characteristics, the disease course, and the differential diagnosis of LOMS and addresses therapeutic considerations for this population.

Escalating to medium- versus high-efficacy disease modifying therapy after low-efficacy treatment in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: In patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) on low-efficacy disease modifying therapies (DMT), the optimal strategy on how to escalate treatment once needed, remains unknown. METHODS: We studied RRMS patients on low-efficacy DMTs listed in the Swiss National Treatment Registry, who underwent escalation to either medium- or high-efficacy DMTs. Propensity score-based matching was applied using 12 clinically relevant variables. Both groups were also separately matched with control subjects who did not escalate therapy. Time to relapse and to disability worsening were evaluated using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Of 1037 eligible patients, we 1:1 matched 450 MS patients who switched from low-efficacy to medium-efficacy (n = 225; 76.0% females, aged 42.4 ± 9.9 years [mean ± SD], median EDSS 3.0 [IQR 2-4]) or high-efficacy DMTs (n = 225; 72.4% females, aged 42.2 ± 10.6 years, median EDSS 3.0 [IQR 2-4]). Escalation to high-efficacy DMTs was associated with lower hazards of relapses than medium-efficacy DMTs (HR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.47-0.95, p = .027) or control subjects (HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.44-0.84, p = .003). By contrast, escalation from low to medium-efficacy DMTs did not alter the hazard for relapses when compared to controls (i.e. patients on low-efficacy DMT who did not escalate DMT during follow-up) CONCLUSION: Our nationwide registry analysis suggests that, once escalation from a low-efficacy DMT is indicated, switching directly to a high-efficacy treatment is superior to a stepwise escalation starting with a moderate-efficacy treatment.

Dissonance in the face of Alzheimer's disease breakthroughs: clinician and lay stakeholder acceptance, concerns and willingness to pay for emerging disease-modifying therapies.

BACKGROUND: Introducing new disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for Alzheimer's disease demands a fundamental shift in diagnosis and care for most health systems around the world. Understanding the views of health professionals, potential patients, care partners and taxpayers is crucial for service planning and expectation management about these new therapies. AIMS: To investigate the public's and professionals' perspectives regarding (1) acceptability of new DMTs for Alzheimer's disease; (2) perceptions of risk/benefits; (3) the public's willingness to pay (WTP). METHOD: Informed by the 'theoretical framework of acceptability', we conducted two online surveys with 1000 members of the general public and 77 health professionals in Ireland. Descriptive and multivariate regression analyses examined factors associated with DMT acceptance and WTP. RESULTS: Healthcare professionals had a higher acceptance (65%) than the general public (48%). Professionals were more concerned about potential brain bleeds (70%) and efficacy (68%), while the public focused on accessibility and costs. Younger participants (18-24 years) displayed a higher WTP. Education and insurance affected WTP decisions. CONCLUSIONS: This study exposes complex attitudes toward emerging DMTs for Alzheimer's disease, challenging conventional wisdom in multiple dimensions. A surprising 25% of the public expressed aversion to these new treatments, despite society's deep-rooted fear of dementia in older age. Healthcare professionals displayed nuanced concerns, prioritising clinical effectiveness and potential brain complications. Intriguingly, younger, better-educated and privately insured individuals exhibited a greater WTP, foregrounding critical questions about healthcare equity. These multifaceted findings serve as a guidepost for healthcare strategists, policymakers and ethicists as we edge closer to integrating DMTs into Alzheimer's disease care.

Lessons learned from the failure of solanezumab as a prospective treatment strategy for Alzheimer's disease.

INTRODUCTION: In the last decade, the efforts conducted for discovering Alzheimer's Disease (AD) treatments targeting the best-known pathogenic factors [amyloid-ß (Aß), tau protein, and neuroinflammation] were mostly unsuccessful. Given that a systemic failure of Aß clearance was supposed to primarily contribute to AD development and progression, disease-modifying therapies with anti-Aß monoclonal antibodies (e.g. solanezumab, bapineuzumab, gantenerumab, aducanumab, lecanemab and donanemab) are ongoing in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with contrasting results. AREAS COVERED: The present Drug Discovery Case History analyzes the failures of RCTs of solanezumab on AD. Furthermore, the authors review the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability effect of solanezumab from preclinical studies with its analogous m266 in mice. Finally, they describe the RCTs with cognitive, cerebrospinal fluid and neuroimaging findings in mild-to-moderate AD (EXPEDITION studies) and in secondary prevention studies (A4 and DIAN-TU). EXPERT OPINION: Solanezumab was one of the first anti-Aß monoclonal antibodies to be tested in preclinical and clinical AD showing to reduce brain Aß level by acting on soluble monomeric form of Aß peptide without significant results on deposits. Unfortunately, this compound showed to accelerate cognitive decline in both asymptomatic and symptomatic trial participants, and this failure of solanezumab further questioned the Aß cascade hypothesis of AD.

Multiple sclerosis in a 4-year-old boy: a case report and literature review.

Pediatric onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) in the very young is a very rare entity and presents a difficult diagnostic challenge due to overlapping signs and symptoms with other diseases. We present a 4-year-old boy who initially presented with right-sided hemiparesis and demyelinating lesions on MRI. Follow-up MRI examinations 3 and 6 months later revealed new demyelinating lesions. Ten months after initial presentation, he presented with right-sided hemiparesis, central facial nerve palsy on the right side and new demyelinating lesions on MRI. Two clinical events and new MRI lesions on follow-up MRIs confirmed the diagnosis of POMS. He was treated with rituximab and experienced no further relapses or radiological progression during the follow-up period.

A review of Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors in multiple sclerosis.

Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors are an emerging class of therapeutics in multiple sclerosis (MS). BTK is expressed in B-cells and myeloid cells, key progenitors of which include dendritic cells, microglia and macrophages, integral effectors of MS pathogenesis, along with mast cells, establishing the relevance of BTK inhibitors to diverse autoimmune conditions. First-generation BTK inhibitors are currently utilized in the treatment of B-cell malignancies and show efficacy in B-cell modulation. B-cell depleting therapies have shown success as disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) in MS, highlighting the potential of BTK inhibitors for this indication; however, first-generation BTK inhibitors exhibit a challenging safety profile that is unsuitable for chronic use, as required for MS DMTs. A second generation of highly selective BTK inhibitors has shown efficacy in modulating MS-relevant mechanisms of pathogenesis in preclinical as well as clinical studies. Six of these BTK inhibitors are undergoing clinical development for MS, three of which are also under investigation for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Phase II trials of selected BTK inhibitors for MS showed reductions in new gadolinium-enhancing lesions on magnetic resonance imaging scans; however, the safety profile is yet to be ascertained in chronic use. Understanding of the safety profile is developing by combining safety insights from the ongoing phase II and III trials of second-generation BTK inhibitors for MS, CSU, RA and SLE. This narrative review investigates the potential of BTK inhibitors as an MS DMT, the improved selectivity of second-generation inhibitors, comparative safety insights established thus far through clinical development programmes and proposed implications in female reproductive health and in long-term administration.

A review of Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors in multiple sclerosis Why was this study done? This study was done to find out about current knowledge on a type of drug, called Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, or BTK inhibitors. There are currently six BTK inhibitors being studied as a possible new drug for treating multiple sclerosis (MS). Some of these six drugs are also being studied as a possible new drug for chronic spontaneous urticaria, rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. These are all autoimmune conditions, where the immune system mistakenly attacks parts of the body. Clinician scientists wanted to understand what is currently known about BTK inhibitors, how they work in the laboratory and how safe they could be for treating autoimmune conditions. This could help us understand more about BTK inhibitors in MS.What did the scientists do? The scientists assessed existing research on these six BTK inhibitors, through a process known as a literature review. These were results from ongoing clinical trials, and information collected through studying BTK inhibitors in laboratories. The researchers pieced together all these findings, to produce this paper that summarizes the results.What did the scientists find? The scientists found that most studies of BTK inhibitors for MS are still ongoing. So far, BTK inhibitors seem to show reasonable safety in most studies, but it is too early to know. The researchers also found out about how BTK inhibitors work in the lab, about what could happen if the drugs are taken for a long time and how they could impact female reproductive health.What do these findings mean? These findings will help other scientists learn more about BTK inhibitors in MS. Trials with BTK inhibitors for MS are still ongoing, but piecing together all the current findings gives a picture of what we know and what still needs to be done.