Arthroscopic Management of the Contact Athlete with Anterior Instability.

Anterior glenohumeral instability is one of the most common injuries suffered from sport. Despite padding and conditioning, the shoulder joint remains particularly vulnerable to injury, especially in the setting of contact. The overall rate of anterior instability is reported to be 0.12 injuries per 1000 athlete exposures, although this is increased up to 0.40 to 0.51 in the contact athlete. Successful treatment requires consideration of restoring stability while minimizing loss of glenohumeral motion. Common treatment strategies involve addressing the pathology that results from anterior shoulder dislocation including labral detachment as well as bony defects to the humeral head and glenoid.

A 65-Year-Old Female with Missed Open Clavicle Fracture and Subsequent Fracture-Related Infection, Treated with Distal Clavicle Resection.

Introduction: Open clavicle fractures are rare, and there are no current reported cases in the literature of a missed open clavicle with resultant fracture-related infection and osteomyelitis. Case Report: We present a 65-year-old female with no reported medical history, who presented to our institution with left clavicular pain and wound drainage 8 days after she was struck by a motor vehicle in her home country of Guyana. She was found to have a missed open clavicle fracture with an associated severe infection. She was subsequently treated with irrigation, debridement, and distal clavicle excision. Conclusion: We present this unique case with a potential procedure which could prove beneficial in cases of infection, trauma, or oncologic lesions in which the distal clavicle is deemed unsalvageable.

Outcomes following fixation of distal clavicle fractures utilizing arthroscopically assisted coracoclavicular ligament stabilization with a suspensory endobutton and cerclage tape.

Background: Distal one-third clavicle fractures are frequently unstable and often require surgical fixation due to high rates of nonunion. Many common methods of fixation have high rates of union but are associated with hardware discomfort and need for secondary surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of a fixation technique involving arthroscopically assisted open reduction internal fixation of unstable distal clavicle fractures via a coracoclavicular (CC) suspensory endobutton and cerclage tape. Methods: This was a retrospective case series evaluating patients who underwent fixation of unstable distal clavicle fractures via arthroscopically assisted CC stabilization by a single fellowship-trained shoulder and elbow surgeon between 2020 and 2022. Demographic and injury-related data were collected via chart review. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were reviewed to evaluate for signs of radiographic union. Primary outcome measures included fracture union, complications, and need for additional procedures. Patients were also contacted via telephone to obtain American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores. Results: Six patients were eligible for inclusion in this study with a mean age of 52.8 ± 14.0 and a mean follow-up of 2.0 years (range 1.6-2.7 years). Mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores were 86.2 ± 21.8 (range 52-100). There were no postoperative complications, signs of symptomatic hardware, or need for secondary surgery at the final follow-up among this cohort of patients. All patients had achieved and maintained full radiographic union at a mean radiographic follow-up of 5.5 months (range 2.0-12.9 months). Conclusion: Arthroscopically assisted CC stabilization of distal clavicle fractures demonstrated high union rates while limiting complications or need for secondary hardware removal. Further analysis on a larger scale is recommended to determine long-term outcomes and direct comparison to other surgical techniques.

The Results of Hook Plate Fixation in Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation and Distal Clavicle Fractures.

Background: Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation and distal clavicle fractures are common shoulder injuries. Different methods of fixation are used to treat such injuries, each has its advantages and disadvantages. In this study, we tested fixation using the hook plate. We think that it is technically simple, reliable and more effective in certain surgical situations. However, it is not gaining adequate popularity due to the potential complications of the plate placement including subacromial osteolysis, impingement, rotator cuff injury and others. A second surgery for plate removal is classically indicated to cope with such complications. Objective: The aim of this study included evaluating the clinical and radiological healing after hook plate fixation in ACJ dislocation and distal clavicle fractures and assessing the incidence and clinical significance of subacromial osteolysis. Methods: It is a prospective observational study with a total of 96 cases including 64 ACJ dislocations and 32 distal clavicle fractures. Constant-Murley score was used for clinical evaluation. The patients were evaluated regularly with a minimum follow up of 12 months after plate removal. Results: At the end of the study we found that the results of the hook plate fixation for both groups were good clinically and radiologically. The clinical result score was found to be initially higher among the patients of the ACJ dislocation mainly due to the earlier plate removal in these patients. However, the final score was found to be comparable in both groups. The incidence of the subacromial osteolysis was found to be higher among the patients with clavicle fractures as the plate was retained for a longer time. However we found that subacromial osteolysis did not imply any increased rate of symptoms over the patients who did not show this complication on the X-ray. Conclusion: Based on these observations, we recommend the hook plate fixation to be added to the armamentarium of the orthopaedic surgeon treating such injuries as it is simple to implement, durable and capable of dealing with difficult situations. The main disadvantage of this method is the need for a second surgery for plate removal.

Comparative clinical outcomes and radiological images of clavicle hook plate versus Scorpion Plate® for unstable distal clavicle fractures.

BACKGROUND: Although various surgical methods are available for unstable distal clavicle fractures, consensus remains lacking on the optimal technique. Therefore, the present retrospective study aimed to compare the clavicle hook plate and Scorpion Plate® in terms of clinical outcomes and radiological findings for unstable distal clavicle fractures. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with unstable distal clavicle fractures who underwent treatment using a clavicle hook plate (Group H; 28 patients) or Scorpion Plate® (Group S; 29 patients) were included in the present study. No patients received additional augmentation and all were followed-up for >1 year (mean follow-up, 28 months). Clinical outcomes were operation time, bleeding volume, complications, range of motion (ROM) at 6 months after surgery and final follow-up, and clinical scores (Constant-Murley score and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score). Radiological outcomes assessed were coracoclavicular distance (CCD), difference in CCD between affected and non-affected sides (ΔCCD), and acromioclavicular subluxation ratio (%ACS) from plain X-rays. The χ2 test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare each outcome. RESULTS: Complications were seen in 3 shoulders (10.7%) in Group H. ROM was significantly worse in Group H at 6 months postoperatively, but no significant differences between groups were evident at final follow-up. Moreover, no significant differences in clinical outcomes were seen between groups. In terms of radiological results, Group H showed greater improvement in CCD and ΔCCD than Group S. Further, %ACS was significantly worse in Group S. CONCLUSIONS: The clavicle hook plate allows reconstruction of a more anatomical position than the Scorpion Plate®, but carries a greater risk of complications. Conversely, the Scorpion Plate® has a low risk of complications, but acromioclavicular subluxation remains. However, no significant differences in ROM or clinical outcomes were apparent at final follow-up.

Using a Nice knot to simplify and strengthen closed reduction in displaced distal clavicle fracture: a technical note.

A displaced distal clavicle fracture often necessitates surgical intervention, with various open and closed reduction options. Open reduction is easier but raises blood supply concerns, while closed reduction can involve complex deforming forces with differing displacement vectors. Herein, we demonstrate how a Nice knot with its sliding and self-locking qualities can be used to make closed reduction easier and the alignment more secure. A case report illustrates this Nice knot application in a 61-year-old male with a distal clavicle fracture. The Nice knot's ability to be loosened and retightened ensured more precise alignment in this case. The Nice knot technique is a versatile option for easier and more secure distal clavicle fracture management.

Ex vivo analysis of cortical microarchitecture of the distal clavicle: implications for surgical management of fractures.

BACKGROUND: Cortical thickness and porosity are two main determinants of cortical bone strength. Thus, mapping variations in these parameters across the full width of the distal end of the clavicle may be helpful for better understanding the basis of distal clavicle fractures and for selecting optimal surgical treatment. METHODS: Distal ends of 11 clavicles (6 men, 5 women; age: 81.9 ± 15.1 years) were scanned by micro-computed tomography at 10-µm resolution. We first analyzed cortical thickness and porosity of each 500-µm-wide area across the superior surface of distal clavicle at the level of conoid tubercle in an antero-posterior direction. This level was chosen for detailed evaluation because previous studies have demonstrated its superior microarchitecture relative to the rest of the distal clavicle. Subsequently, we divided the full width of distal clavicle to three subregions (anterior, middle, and posterior) and analyzed cortical porosity, pore diameter, pore separation, and cortical thickness. RESULTS: We found the largest number of low-thickness and high-porosity areas in the anterior subregion. Cortical porosity, pore diameter, pore separation, and cortical thickness varied significantly among the three subregions (p < 0.001 p = 0.016, p = 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). Cortex of the anterior subregion was more porous than that of the middle subregion (p < 0.001) and more porous and thinner than that of the posterior subregion (p < 0.001, p = 0.030, respectively). Interaction of site and sex revealed higher porosity of the anterior subregion in women (p < 0.001). The anterior subregion had larger pores than the middle subregion (p = 0.019), whereas the middle subregion had greater pore separation compared with the anterior (p = 0.002) and posterior subregions (p = 0.006). In general, compared with men, women had thinner (p < 0.001) and more porous cortex (p = 0.03) with larger cortical pores (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Due to high cortical porosity and low thickness, the anterior conoid subregion exhibits poor bone microarchitecture, particularly in women, which may be considered in clinical practice. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Low acromial insufficiency fracture rate in reverse shoulder arthroplasty with distal clavicle excision.

Background: This study investigated the rate of acromial insufficiency fractures (AIF) in patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with concomitant distal clavicle excision (DCE). Methods: Patients who underwent primary RSA with DCE by a single surgeon from 2010 to 2021 were identified. Exclusion criteria included revision RSA, RSA for fracture, or cases utilizing an augmented baseplate or bone graft. AIF was defined as a radiographically proven acromion or scapular spine fracture. Pain without an identifiable fracture on imaging was defined as an acromial insufficiency reaction. Patient demographics, implant information, and radiograph measurements were compared between patients with and without acromial pathology. Results: One hundred and seventy-five patients were included. Mean age was 72.8 years, and 67% of patients were female. There were 3/174 acromial insufficiency fractures (1.7%). AIF occurred at a mean of 9.3 months after surgery. Twelve patients had insufficiency reactions (6.9%). Patients with acromial pathology were more likely to be female (p = .003) and have a diagnosis of osteoporosis (p = .047) and inflammatory arthritis (p = .049). There was no significant difference between groups in terms of other factors. Conclusion: The AIF rate in patients who underwent RSA with DCE was 1.7%. These findings suggest that DCE in the setting of RSA may have a protective role against AIF.

Biomechanical evaluation of fixation of the coracoclavicular stand-alone cow-hitch suture reconstruction in comparison to two established techniques for highly unstable distal clavicle fractures (Neer type V).

Background: Treatment of displaced distal clavicle fractures with bony avulsion of the coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments often warrants surgical fixation, yet a gold standard surgical technique is to be defined. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical fixation strength of a new fixation technique, the CC stand-alone cow-hitch suture reconstruction, and to compare this technique with a clavicle hook plate and a lateral locking plate with CC suture reconstruction. Methods: Simulated Neer type V distal clavicle fractures of the clavicle were created in 18 cadaveric shoulders, which were matched by age and gender in 3 groups: (1) clavicle hook plate (group HP), (2) lateral locking plate fixation with CC suture reconstruction (group LPCC), and (3) CC stand-alone suture reconstruction using the cow-hitch technique (group CH). After preconditioning with 25 N for 10 cycles, the specimens were cycled in the coronal plane for 500 cycles from 10N to 70N. Displacement and ultimate load to failure were documented and analyzed with the data acquisition system. Results: There was a significant difference in the fracture displacement during cyclic loading between the LPCC group and the HP group (0.6 vs. 1.7 mm; P = .02) and between the CH and HP groups (0.5 vs. 1.7 mm; P = .004). Fracture displacement was not different between the LPCC and the CH groups (P = .544). The CH group and the LPCC group showed a significantly higher stiffness compared to the HP group (P < .001 and P = .003, respectively). The CH group showed a significantly higher ultimate load to failure compared with the HP group (429 vs. 172 N; P = .005) and showed a tendency toward higher ultimate load to failure when compared with the LPCC group (429 vs. 258 N; P = .071). Conclusion: The CC stand-alone cow-hitch suture reconstruction and the locking plate with CC reconstruction showed higher fixation strength compared with the hook plate for simulated Neer type V distal clavicle fractures. There was a tendency of higher ultimate load to failure with the cow-hitch technique compared with the lateral locking plate with CC suture reconstruction, and given the potential advantages of less soft tissue stripping, metal-free fixation, low costs, and simple surgical technique, clinical application of the all-suture CC reconstruction using the cow-hitch for Neer type V distal clavicle fractures appears warranted.

A systematic review of the treatment of primary acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis.

Background: This systematic review aims to comprehensively summarise and present the available evidence for the treatment of primary acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: Five databases were searched for studies investigating the management of ACJ OA. Included were studies with participants with clinical/radiological signs of primary ACJ OA, an intervention and included a functional outcome measure. Results: Forty-eight studies were included. Treatments consisted of physiotherapy (n = 1 study), medical only (n = 11) and operative management (n = 36). Operative studies included five comparative trials - physiotherapy versus surgery (n = 1) and open versus arthroscopic resection (n = 4). A total of 1902 shoulders were treated for ACJ OA, mean age (51 years), 58% male and mean follow-up (28.5 months). Treatment with injection showed a mean improvement of 50% in pain levels at follow-up (mean = 7.5 months). The commonest surgical procedure was arthroscopic excision of the distal clavicle and operative studies averaged 6 months of conservative management and a mean functional outcome of 87.8%. Conclusion: Studies varied in indication, intervention and quality but it did not provide evidence that both non-operative and operative interventions are effective. There was no significant difference between open or arthroscopic distal clavicle excision (DCE). Participants having between 0.5 and 2 cm of clavicle excised had good outcomes and those requiring concomitant shoulder procedures had similarly good outcomes.

Lateral clavicle fracture-plating options and considerations.

Clavicle fractures are among the most prevalent types of fractures with numerous treatment strategies that have evolved over time. In the realm of lateral-third clavicle fracture management, several surgical methods are available, with plate and screw constructs being one of the most frequently employed options. Within this construct, numerous choices exist for fixing the fracture. This editorial provides an overview of the common plate options utilized in the management of distal third clavicle fractures underscoring the critical considerations and approaches that guide clinicians in selecting the most appropriate fixation techniques, considering the complex landscape of clavicle fractures and their challenging management.

Arthroscopic distal clavicle resection versus conservation in patients with combined rotator cuff tears and acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis.

PURPOSE: The most common cause of shoulder pain originating from the acromioclavicular (AC) joint is osteoarthritis, causing pain and disability. Operative Management of AC arthritis includes arthroscopic distal clavicle resection (DCR) and open clavicle resection. This study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of isolated rotator cuff repair with conservative treatment of ACJ arthritis versus the combined resection of the distal clavicle with the repair of a rotator cuff tear, in cases with acromioclavicular arthritis. METHODS: A total of 46 patients with unilateral or bilateral combined rotator cuff tear and acromioclavicular arthritis were included, they were classified into 2 independent groups: Conservative group (23 patients), and DCR group (23 patients). All patients were subjected to full history taking, examination, pre and post-operative University of California at Los Angeles shoulder scoring scale (UCLA), Antero-Posterior and Zanca X-rays views, early and late complications. RESULTS: Mean age was (51 ± 9) years, males were predominant (56.5%). The average post-operative UCLA score was (31.1 ± 4.9), and the average time to return to work was (214 ± 22). (2.2%) of patients had early complications, (19.6%) had late complications, (32.6%) had > 24 h till 1st post-operative analgesia, and (87%) needed MgSO4 Injection. We found a highly significant increase in UCLA score measurements in the Conservative group, and a highly significant increase in UCLA score measurements in the DCR group (p < 0.01). But there was no difference between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Conventional conservative approach with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and subacromial decompression has proven to be as effective as arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and subacromial decompression with DCR, in terms of efficacy and safety profiles in short term, but with more risks of potential hazards and cost with the DCR.

Are displaced distal clavicle fractures associated with inferior clinical outcomes following nonoperative management? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Management of displaced distal clavicle fractures remains a topic of discussion because of notoriously high nonunion rates, but there is little documented in the literature as to what effect this may have on patient-reported function. The aim of this systematic review was to look at nonoperative management following displaced distal clavicle fractures to determine union rates, complications, and patient-reported outcome measures. METHODS: A review of the online databases MEDLINE and Embase was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Clinical studies that included a cohort of nonoperatively managed displaced distal clavicle fractures and reported on union rate, complications, and patient-reported functional scores were included. RESULTS: Eleven studies were eligible for inclusion (2 randomized controlled trials, 1 prospective noncomparative cohort study, 5 retrospective comparative cohort studies, and 3 case series) with a total of 779 patients included in this review. Average union rate was 63.2% (22.2%-94.4%) in nonoperatively managed patients, compared with 96.3% (87.9%-100%) in operatively managed patients. The Constant-Murley score and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire were the most frequently used outcome measure tools. No study demonstrated any significant difference in any outcome measure when comparing nonoperative with operative treatment. Complication rate (including nonunion) in nonoperatively managed patients was 45.1%, with 11.1% requiring delayed surgery. Average complication rate in the operatively managed groups was 41.2%, with 40.1% requiring a second operation. CONCLUSION: Nonoperative management of displaced distal clavicle fractures results in higher nonunion rates, but shoulder function remains excellent, and risk of complications and delayed surgery are low. Decision making must take into account patient factors and expectations to provide high-quality, individualized care.

Successful management of a distal clavicular fracture using Titanium elastic nail (TEN) fixation.

This case report presents a unique instance of a 25-year-old male patient successfully treated with Titanium elastic nail (TEN) for a distal clavicle fracture, a method typically reserved for midshaft clavicle fractures. Distal clavicular fractures, constituting 12%-15% of all clavicle fractures, often necessitate surgical intervention to avoid complications such as malunion and persistent pain. While standard surgical therapies include Kirschner wire and hook plate fixation, this case explores the benefits of TEN, known for minimal tissue disruption and faster recovery. The patient, who suffered a severe left shoulder injury after falling, underwent a minimally invasive TEN procedure. Post-surgery, he showed a significant reduction in pain and improvement in shoulder mobility, with radiographic evaluations confirming successful fracture reduction and stable fixation. The case underscores the potential of TEN as a viable alternative for distal clavicular fractures, though further research is needed to establish comprehensive guidelines for its application.

Comparison of single versus double coracoclavicular loop stabilization technique for the management of unstable distal clavicular fractures: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: The coracoclavicular (CC) loop stabilization technique is proposed for unstable distal clavicular fractures. This study aims to compare single and double CC loop stabilizations and evaluate differences in functional and radiographic outcomes between them. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial involving 46 patients who sustained unstable distal clavicular fractures between April 2017 and 2019. The participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the single CC loop stabilization group (n = 23) or the double CC loop stabilization group (n = 23). We assessed their Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), and pain level. Additionally, we recorded data on time to union, CC distance, and any complications. RESULTS: The single CC loop group demonstrated a shorter operative time and significantly higher Constant score than the double CC loop group at 1 month (77.32 ± 5.65 vs. 71.91 ± 8.33; p = 0.016) and 3 months (86.17 ± 4.05 vs. 81.13 ± 6.34; p = 0.009) postoperatively. However, there was no differences in the ASES score, time to union or CC distance restoration between two groups. Implant irritation was observed in the double CC loop group (26.1%), but there were no cases requiring revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Both single and double CC loop stabilization demonstrated favorable outcomes, including a high union rate and minimal complications. Single CC loop stabilization showed slightly better early functional outcomes, reduced implant-related irritation, and shorter operative times.

Distal clavicle fractures treated by anteroinferior plating with a single screw: Two case reports.

BACKGROUND: For the treatment of distal clavicle fractures, each treatment method has its own advantages and disadvantages, and there is no optimal surgical solution. CASE SUMMARY: Based on this, we report 2 cases of distal clavicle fractures treated utilizing an anterior inferior plate with a single screw placed in the distal, in anticipation of providing a better surgical approach to distal clavicle fracture treatment. Two patients were admitted to the hospital after trauma with a diagnosis of distal clavicle fracture, and were admitted to the hospital for internal fixation of clavicle fracture by incision and reduction, with good postoperative functional recovery. CONCLUSION: With solid postoperative fixation and satisfactory prognostic functional recovery, this technique has been shown to be simple, easy to perform and effective.

Patient outcomes following arthroscopic distal clavicle excision: a prospective case series.

Background: Distal clavicle excision for acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) pathology is currently the mainstay of surgical management in patients with symptoms refractory to nonoperative treatment. There have been few high quality studies outlining the efficacy of arthroscopic excision of the distal clavicle as a single procedure in patients with isolated disease. Aim: To characterize function and pain outcomes in patients undergoing arthroscopic distal clavicle excision by utilizing stringent inclusion criteria to isolate ACJ pathology. Methods: Prospective data collection was undertaken with a minimum two year follow-up of 59 patients undergoing arthroscopic distal clavicle excision for ACJ osteoarthritis or distal clavicle osteolysis. Stringent eligibility criteria were applied to each patient. Data collection consisted of demographic data, clinical assessment of range of motion, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), utilizing the standardized Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and the Visual Analogue (VAS) score to characterize pain. Furthermore, time to return to work and sport and a subjective measure of how 'normal' the shoulder felt were assessed. Data was recorded preoperatively, and at six, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Statistical analysis was conducted utilizing institutional support. Results: Statistically significant improvements in range of motion measurements (abduction, forward elevation and external rotation), and PROMs (SPADI and VAS scores) were reported. VAS scores reduced from an average of 8.20 preoperatively to 3.39 (P < .001), 2.13 (P < .001) and 1.36 (P < .001) at 6, 12, and 24 month follow-up, respectively. Similarly, SPADI scores reduced from an average of 62.65 preoperatively to 19.96 (P < .001), 12.6 (P < .001), and 6.13 (P < .001) at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. The majority of patients were able to return to sport and work, within an average time of 1.72 and 3.02 months. Conclusion: In patients who presented with isolated ACJ pathology, arthroscopic distal clavicle excision, as a single procedure, results in statistically significant improvements in PROMs and functional outcomes.