Prospective study about the security and efficacy of treatment without antibiotic therapy of patients diagnosed with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis after launching a protocol at a tertiary hospital.

INTRODUCTION: The main objective of our study is to analyze the results in our hospital after launching a treatment protocol without antibiotic therapy for patients diagnosed with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis. METHODS: Our observational, prospective, single-center study was developed after launching a treatment protocol without antibiotic therapy for patients diagnosed with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis (AUD) in January 2021. The follow-up period was from January 1, 2021 to September 30, 2023. Variables evaluated by the study have included demographic and analytical variables, as well as those related to diagnosis and whether the patients needed to start antibiotic treatment, inpatient treatment, or surgical procedures. RESULTS: In total, 199 patients were diagnosed with AUD, 75 of whom were treated without antibiotic therapy as outpatients. Seven of these patients needed to start antibiotic treatment because of adverse evolution; none of these patients required surgical procedures. The need for inpatient treatment, urgent care, or surgical procedures is similar to the group of patients treated with antibiotics. The main risk factor of failure of outpatient treatment without antibiotic therapy identified by the study was the presence of bacteriuria at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm previous reports, observing that treatment without antibiotic therapy in selected patients with AUD is safe.

Resultados de una encuesta nacional sobre el manejo de los pacientes diagnosticados de diverticulitis aguda no complicada / Results of a national survey about the management of patients with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis

Introducción: El manejo de los pacientes diagnosticados de diverticulitis aguda no complicada ha evolucionado en los últimos años, y según diversas guías clínicas internacionales actuales, el tratamiento ambulatorio y sin antibioterapia puede ser utilizado en pacientes seleccionados. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar la adhesión de los distintos centros nacionales a estas y otras recomendaciones en esta enfermedad. Métodos: Se realizó una encuesta online a nivel nacional que se dio a conocer a través de diversas aplicaciones informáticas y se analizaron estadísticamente los resultados obtenidos. Resultados: Participaron 104 cirujanos, representando 69 centros hospitalarios nacionales. En el 82,6% de los centros, se realiza manejo ambulatorio de los pacientes diagnosticados de diverticulitis aguda no complicada. El 23,2% de los centros tiene implantado un protocolo de tratamiento sin antibioterapia en pacientes seleccionados, mientras que en los centros que no siguen estas recomendaciones, las razones principales son las dificultades logísticas para su desarrollo (49,3%) y la ausencia de evidencia actual para ello (44,8%). Se han encontrado diferencias estadísticamente significativas al comparar la implantación de dichos protocolos entre centros con unidades acreditadas avanzadas y aquellas que no, con mayores tasas de manejo ambulatorio y sin antibioterapia en los centros acreditados avanzados (p≤0,05). Conclusiones: A pesar de ser una enfermedad muy frecuente, existe mucha heterogeneidad en su tratamiento a nivel nacional, por lo que sería recomendable la unificación de criterios diagnósticos y de tratamiento mediante la colaboración de las sociedades científicas y la simplificación de la puesta en marcha de protocolos hospitalarios.(AU)

Introduction: Management of patients diagnosed of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis has evolved lately and according to the latest guidelines, outpatient treatment and management without antibiotherapy may be used in selected patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the adhesion among national centres to these and others recommendations related to this pathology. Methods: An online national survey, that has been broadcast by several applications, was performed. The results obtained were statistically analysed. Results: A total of 104 surgeons participated, representing 69 national hospitals. Of those, in 82.6% of the centers, outpatient management is performed for acute uncomplicated diverticulitis. 23.2% of the hospitals have a protocol stablished for treatment without antibiotherapy in selected patients. Centers that do not follow these protocols allege that the mean reasons are the logistic difficulties to set them up (49.3%) and the lack of current evidence for it (44.8%). Significative statistical differences have been found when comparing the establishment of such protocols between centers with advanced accredited units and those who are not, with higher rates of outpatient management and treatment without antibiotics in accredited units (P≤.05). Conclusions: In spite that this a very common disease, there is a huge national heterogeneity in its treatment. This is why it would adviseable to unify diagnostic and treatment criteria by the collaboration of scientific societies and the simplification of the development of hospitalary protocols.(AU)

Results of a national survey about the management of patients with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis.

INTRODUCTION: Management of patients diagnosed of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis has evolved lately and according to the latest guidelines, outpatient treatment and management without antibiotherapy may be used in selected patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the adhesión among national centres to these and others recommendations related to this pathology. METHODS: An online national survey, that has been broadcast by several applications, was performed. The results obtained were statistically analysed. RESULTS: A total of 104 surgeons participated, representing 69 national hospitals. Of those, in 82.6% of the centres, outpatient management is performed for acute uncomplicated diverticulitis. 23.2% of the hospitals have a protocol stablished for treatment without antibiotherapy in selected patients. Centres that do not follow these protocols allege that the mean reasons are the logistic difficulties to set them up (49.3%) and the lack of current evidence for it (44.8%). Significative statistical differences have been found when comparing the establishment of such protocols between centres with advanced accredited units and those who are not, with higher rates of outpatient management and treatment without antibiotics in accredited units (p ≤ .05). CONCLUSIONS: In spite that this a very common disease, there is a huge national heterogeneity in its treatment. This is why it would adviseable to unify diagnostic and treatment criteria by the collaboration of scientific societies and the simplification of the development of hospitalary protocols.

[Tratamiento ambulatorio de la diverticulitis aguda no complicada. Análisis de nuestra experiencia]. / Outpatient treatment of uncomplicated acute diverticulitis. Analysis of our experience.

OBJECTIVE: Analyze the safety and efficacy of the outpatient treatment of uncomplicated acute diverticulitis and a costs analysis. METHOD: We conducted a prospective, non-randomized study between June 2014 and June 2017. We included all patients diagnosed of uncomplicated acute diverticulitis based on clinical and abdominal computed tomography scan in the Emergency Department of the University Hospital San Juan de Alicante (Spain). Outpatient treatment consisted of oral antibiotics for 7 days (amoxicillin-clavulanate or ciprofloxacin and metronidazole in patients with betalactamic allergy), liquid diet for 72 h and analgesics. Costs were evaluated according to the Law of Rates of Valencian Community. RESULTS: Ninety patients were included, 49 females and 41 males with a median age of 56 years. Success rate was 95.5% (n = 86) requiring hospital admission 4 patients (4.5%). Antibiotic treatment was amoxicillin-clavulanate in 82 patients (91.1%) and ciprofloxacin and metronidazole in 8 (8.9%). Cost savings per patient was approximately 1985 € comparing with hypothetically all inpatient treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient treatment of uncomplicated acute diverticulitis can be performed successfully in most patients allowing an important cost savings.

OBJETIVO: Evaluar la seguridad y la eficacia del tratamiento con antibiótico oral para la diverticulitis aguda no complicada, y realizar un análisis de costos. MÉTODO: Estudio prospectivo, no aleatorizado, entre junio de 2014 y junio de 2017. Se incluyeron todos los pacientes diagnosticados de diverticulitis aguda no complicada según la clínica y la tomografía abdominal en el servicio de urgencias del Hospital Universitario San Juan de Alicante (España). El tratamiento ambulatorio consistió en antibiótico oral durante 7 días (amoxicilina-ácido clavulánico o ciprofloxacino y metronidazol en alérgicos a los betalactámicos), dieta líquida durante 72 horas y analgésicos. Los costos fueron evaluados según la Ley de Tasas de la Comunidad Valenciana. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 90 pacientes, 49 mujeres y 41 hombres, con una mediana de edad de 56 años. La tasa de éxito fue del 95.5% (n = 86), necesitando ingreso hospitalario cuatro pacientes (4.5%). El tratamiento antibiótico empleado fue amoxicilina-ácido clavulánico en 82 pacientes (91.1%) y ciprofloxacino con metronidazol en ocho pacientes (8.9%). El ahorro por paciente fue de 1985 euros en comparación con el hipotético ingreso de todos los pacientes. CONCLUSIONES: El tratamiento ambulatorio de la diverticulitis aguda no complicada se completó con éxito en la mayoría de los pacientes, permitiendo una importante reducción del gasto.

[Outpatient treatment of uncomplicated acute diverticulitis: Impact on healthcare costs]. / Tratamiento ambulatorio de la diverticulitis aguda no complicada: impacto sobre los costes sanitarios.

BACKGROUND: Outpatient treatment of uncomplicated acute diverticulitis is safe and effective. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of outpatient treatment on the reduction of healthcare costs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study comparing 2 groups was performed. In the outpatient treatment group, patients diagnosed with uncomplicated acute diverticulitis were treated with oral antibiotics at home. In the hospital treatment group, patients met the criteria for outpatient treatment but were admitted to hospital and received intravenous antibiotic therapy. Cost estimates have been made using the hospital cost accounting system based on total costs, the sum of all variable costs (direct costs) plus overhead expenses divided by activity (indirect costs). RESULTS: A total of 136 patients were included, 90 in the outpatient treatment group and 46 in the hospital group. There were no differences in the characteristics of the patients in both groups. There were also no differences in the treatment failure rate in both groups (5.5% vs. 4.3%; P=.7). The total cost per episode was significantly lower in the outpatient treatment group (882 ± 462 vs. 2.376 ± 830 euros; P=.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient treatment of acute diverticulitis is not only safe and effective but also reduces healthcare costs by more than 60%.