Nivolumab Plus 5-Azacitidine in Pediatric Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): Phase I/II Trial Results from the Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia and Lymphoma (TACL) Consortium.

Improvements in survival have been made over the past two decades for childhood acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but the approximately 40% of patients who relapse continue to have poor outcomes. A combination of checkpoint-inhibitor nivolumab and azacitidine has demonstrated improvements in median survival in adults with AML. This phase I/II study with nivolumab and azacitidine in children with relapsed/refractory AML (NCT03825367) was conducted through the Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia & Lymphoma consortium. Thirteen patients, median age 13.7 years, were enrolled. Patients had refractory disease with multiple reinduction attempts. Twelve evaluable patients were treated at the recommended phase II dose (established at dose level 1, 3 mg/kg/dose). Four patients (33%) maintained stable disease. This combination was well tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicities observed. Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were primarily hematological. Febrile neutropenia was the most common AE ≥ grade 3. A trend to improved quality of life was noted. Increases in CD8+ T cells and reductions in CD4+/CD8+ T cells and demethylation were observed. The combination was well tolerated and had an acceptable safety profile in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory AML. Future studies might explore this combination for the maintenance of remission in children with AML at high risk of relapse.

Mechanisms underlying dose-limiting toxicities of conventional chemotherapeutic agents.

Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) are severe adverse effects that define the maximum tolerated dose of a cancer drug. In addition to the specific mechanisms of each drug, common contributing factors include inflammation, apoptosis, ion imbalances, and tissue-specific enzyme deficiencies. Among various DLTs are bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis, doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy, cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity, methotrexate-induced hepatotoxicity, vincristine-induced neurotoxicity, paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy, and irinotecan, which elicits severe diarrhea. Currently, specific treatments beyond dose reduction are lacking for most toxicities. Further research on cellular and molecular pathways is imperative to improve their management. This review synthesizes preclinical and clinical data on the pharmacological mechanisms underlying DLTs and explores possible treatment approaches. A comprehensive perspective reveals knowledge gaps and emphasizes the need for future studies to develop more targeted strategies for mitigating these dose-dependent adverse effects. This could allow the safer administration of fully efficacious doses to maximize patient survival.

The dose-limiting toxicity of most anticancer drugs occurs via the activation of inflammatory/apoptosis/ROS pathways.Regarding the dose-limiting toxicity of most anticancer drugs, there is no specific treatment other than discontinuation or dose reduction.Accurately identifying the molecular pathways involved in the dose-limiting toxicity of anticancer drugs can help to identify new treatments.

Reporting and impact of subsequent cycle toxicities in oncology phase I clinical trials.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: As oncology treatments evolve, classic assumptions of toxicity associated with cytotoxic agents may be less relevant, requiring new design strategies for trials intended to inform dosing strategies for agents that may be administered beyond a set number of defined cycles. We describe the overall incidence of dose-limiting toxicities during and after cycle 1, frequency of reporting subsequent cycle toxicities, and the impact of post-cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities on conclusions drawn from oncology phase 1 clinical trials. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of subsequent cycle toxicities in oncology phase I clinical trials published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology from 2000 to 2020. We used chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression to describe predictors of reporting subsequent cycle toxicity data. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2020, we identified 489 articles reporting on therapeutic phase 1 clinical trials. Of these, 421 (86%) reported data regarding cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities and 170 (35%) reported data on cycle 1 dose modifications. Of the trials that reported cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities, the median percentage of patients that experienced cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities was 8.89%. Only 47 (9.6%) publications reported on post-cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities and only 92 (19%) reported on dose modifications beyond cycle 1. Of the trials that reported post-cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities, the median percentage of patients that experienced post-cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities was 14.8%. Among the 371 studies with a recommended phase 2 dose, 89% did not report whether post-cycle 1 toxicities impacted the recommended phase 2 dose. More recent year of publication was independently associated with reduced odds of reporting subsequent cycle toxicity. CONCLUSION: Reporting of subsequent cycle toxicity is uncommon in oncology phase I clinical trial publications and becoming less common over time. Guidelines for reporting of phase I oncology clinical trials should expand to include toxicity data beyond the first cycle.

Studies to Assess the Utility of Serum Neurofilament Light Chain as a Biomarker in Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is one of the most common and disabling dose-limiting toxicities of chemotherapy. We report here the results of two separate non-interventional studies (49 patients), which evaluated blood neurofilament light chain (NfL) as a biomarker of CIPN in breast cancer patients treated with paclitaxel. All patients underwent a standard treatment protocol that was established independently of the present studies. NfL was measured in serum using an ultrasensitive single-molecule array and compared with the self-administered European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-CIPN twenty-item scale (CIPN20) and Total Neuropathy Score clinical version (TNSc), a clinician-reported measure of neuropathy progression. The TNSc increased with cumulative dose compared with baseline, and the NfL concentrations were also strongly associated with the cumulative dose of chemotherapy. The analysis showed a correlation between TNSc and NfL. Both TNSc and NfL showed weak to moderate associations with CIPN20 subscores, with a better association for the CIPN20 sensory compared with motor and autonomic subscores. Data from the two studies provide evidence that serum NfL has the potential to be used as a biomarker to monitor and mitigate CIPN. However, studies with additional patients planned in the ongoing clinical trial will determine the universal application of NfL as a biomarker in CIPN.

Association of ADME gene polymorphisms on toxicity to CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients with HR+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer.

A wide interindividual variability in therapeutic response to cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDKis) palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib, among patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer has been reported. This study explored the impact of genetic polymorphisms in ADME genes (responsible for drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination) on CDKis safety profiles in 230 patients. Selected endpoints include grade 3/4 neutropenia at day 14 of the first treatment cycle, early dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and dose reductions within the initial three cycles. Our analysis revealed associations between these endpoints and polymorphisms in CYP3A4, CYP3A5, ABCB1, and ABCG2 genes. Their impact on CDKis plasma concentrations (Ctrough) was also examined. Specifically, ABCB1 c.1236C>T and c.2677C>T polymorphisms correlated significantly with grade 3/4 neutropenia at day 14 (OR 3.94, 95% CI 1.32-11.75; p = 0.014 and OR 3.32, 95% CI 1.12-9.85; p = 0.030). Additionally, ABCB1 c.3435C>T was associated with an elevated risk of early DLTs and dose reductions (OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.22-8.84, p = 0.019; OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.20-5.60, p = 0.015). Carriers of the CYP3A4*22 allele also demonstrated in univariate a higher risk of early DLTs (OR 3.10, 95% CI 1.01-9.56, p = 0.049). Furthermore, individuals with the ABCB1 1236T-3435T-2677T(A) variant haplotype exhibited significant associations with grade 3/4 neutropenia at day 14 (OR 3.36, 95% CI 1.20-9.41; p = 0.021) and early DLTs in univariate (OR 3.08, 95% CI 1.19-7.95; p = 0.020). Homozygous carriers of the ABCB1 T-T-T(A) haplotype tended to have a higher mean ribociclib Ctrough (934.0 ng/mL vs. 752.0 ng/mL and 668.0 ng/mL). Regardless preliminary, these findings offer promising insights into the role of pharmacogenetic markers in CDKis safety profiles, potentially contributing to address the interindividual variability in CDKis responses.

Evaluation of toxicities for intravesical drugs in phase 1 bladder cancer trials.

BACKGROUND: Improving clinical trial design is important for optimizing approval of safe and effective drugs. Phase 1 clinical trials seek to determine phase 2 doses by investigating predefined dose-limiting toxicities. Traditional definitions of dose-limiting toxicity may not be applicable to intravesical therapies for bladder cancer. This study compared the frequency of dose-limiting toxicities and serious adverse events in bladder cancer trials for intravesical therapies to other routes of administration. METHODS: Studies were abstracted from ClinicalTrials.gov and reconciled with a PubMed search. Primary and secondary end points were predefined before data abstraction, and the primary end point was subject-level dose-limiting toxicity rate. Fisher exact tests were performed with p < .05 designated as significant. RESULTS: Eighteen intravesical studies and 24 studies with other routes of administration (the per os/intravenous/intramuscular [PO/IV/IM] group) were identified. Dose-limiting toxicities were reported in 38.9% of intravesical studies, affecting 3.29% of subjects, compared with 30.0% of PO/IV/IM studies representing 4.19% of subjects (p = .52 for study-level and p = .60 for subject-level comparisons). Serious adverse events occurred in 53.9% of intravesical studies in 10.3% of subjects versus 91.0% of studies reporting serious adverse events affecting 41.4% of subjects in the PO/IV/IM group (p = .03 for subject-level and p < .0001 for study-level comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in subject-level dose-limiting toxicity rate between intravesical and PO/IV/IM bladder cancer trials. The serious adverse event rate was lower in the intravesical group. Heterogeneity of dose-limiting toxicity definition may affect interpretation of toxicity in phase 1 bladder cancer clinical trials studying different routes of administration. LAY SUMMARY: Bladder cancer is a common cancer type that may be treated with therapies that are instilled into the bladder and act locally, called intravesical therapies. This study used publicly available regulatory data from early phase clinical trials to determine whether measures of tolerability used in clinical trials are applicable to intravesical therapies for bladder cancer.

Effect of the area under the curve of carboplatin dosage on therapeutic efficacy and safety in Chinese patients with epithelial ovarian cancer / 西安交通大学学报(医学版)

【Objective】 To retrospectively analyze the average carboplatin dosage and calculate the area under the curve (AUC) using the Calvert formula in first-line chemotherapy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer in The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University so as to evaluate the effect of the AUC difference in the Chinese population on therapeutic efficacy and safety. 【Methods】 We enrolled patients who underwent first-line chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin 3-week regimen in our hospital from January 1, 2012 to January 1, 2022. According to the median of AUC, the patients were divided into high-dose group and low-dose group. The overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the incidence of adverse events (AEs) were compared. 【Results】 A total of 153 patients were enrolled in this study and the median AUC of carboplatin was 3.981 (range 2.314-5.446). Only 10.46% patients (16/153) had an AUC above 5. There were 77 patients with the AUC0.05). The ORR in the low-dose group and the high-dose group was 59.74% and 57.89%, respectively, and the DCR was 87.01% and 85.53%, respectively. The median PFS of the two groups was 14 and 15.5 months, respectively, and the median OS was 50 and 55 months, respectively. None of the above outcomes were statistically different between the two groups (P>0.05). The two groups showed significant differences in the incidence of anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia (P<0.05). The incidence of nausea and vomiting, grade 1-2 diarrhea or constipation, and grade 1-2 fever showed significant differences (P<0.05). In addition, the incidence of dose limiting toxicity (DLT), including grade 4 thrombocytopenia and febrile neutropenia (FN), was significantly increased in the high-dose group (P<0.05). 【Conclusion】 Compared with the recommended AUC 5-6 of carboplatin abroad, the actual carboplatin dosage in the first-line chemotherapy for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer was generally insufficient in our hospital. There was no difference in therapeutic efficacy between the patients with AUC<4 and AUC≥4. However, considering the increased risk of some AEs and DLT in the high-dose group, it is not recommended to increase the carboplatin AUC blindly.

Association of Low Handgrip Strength with Chemotherapy Toxicity in Digestive Cancer Patients: A Comprehensive Observational Cohort Study (FIGHTDIGOTOX).

In the FIGHTDIGO study, digestive cancer patients with dynapenia experienced more chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicities. FIGHTDIGOTOX aimed to evaluate the relationship between pre-therapeutic handgrip strength (HGS) and chemotherapy-induced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) or all-grade toxicity in digestive cancer patients. HGS measurement was performed with a Jamar dynamometer. Dynapenia was defined according to EWGSOP2 criteria (<27 kg (men); <16 kg (women)). DLT was defined as any toxicity leading to dose reduction, treatment delay, or permanent discontinuation. We also performed an exploratory analysis in patients below the included population's median HGS. A total of 244 patients were included. According to EWGSOP2 criteria, 23 patients had pre-therapeutic dynapenia (9.4%). With our exploratory median-based threshold (34 kg for men; 22 kg for women), 107 patients were dynapenic (43.8%). For each threshold, dynapenia was not an independent predictive factor of overall DLT and neurotoxicity. Dynapenic patients according to EWGSOP2 definition experienced more hand-foot syndrome (p = 0.007). Low HGS according to our exploratory threshold was associated with more all-grade asthenia (p = 0.014), anemia (p = 0.006), and asthenia with DLT (p = 0.029). Pre-therapeutic dynapenia was not a predictive factor for overall DLT and neurotoxicity in digestive cancer patients but could be a predictive factor of chemotherapy-induced anemia and asthenia. There is a need to better define the threshold of dynapenia in cancer patients.

CpG ODN (K3)-toll-like receptor 9 agonist-induces Th1-type immune response and enhances cytotoxic activity in advanced lung cancer patients: a phase I study.

BACKGROUND: Cytosine-phosphate-guanine oligodeoxynucleotide (CpG ODN) (K3)-a novel synthetic single-stranded DNA immune adjuvant for cancer immunotherapy-induces a potential Th1-type immune response against cancer cells. We conducted a phase I study of CpG ODN (K3) in patients with lung cancer to assess its safety and patients' immune responses. METHODS: The primary endpoint was the proportion of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) at each dose level. Secondary endpoints included safety profile, an immune response, including dynamic changes in immune cell and cytokine production, and progression-free survival (PFS). In a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design, the dosage levels for CpG ODN (K3) were 5 or 10 mg/body via subcutaneous injection and 0.2 mg/kg via intravenous administration on days 1, 8, 15, and 29. RESULTS: Nine patients (eight non-small-cell lung cancer; one small-cell lung cancer) were enrolled. We found no DLTs at any dose level and observed no serious treatment-related adverse events. The median observation period after registration was 55 days (range: 46-181 days). Serum IFN-α2 levels, but not inflammatory cytokines, increased in six patients after the third administration of CpG ODN (K3) (mean value: from 2.67 pg/mL to 3.61 pg/mL after 24 hours). Serum IFN-γ (mean value, from 9.07 pg/mL to 12.7 pg/m after 24 hours) and CXCL10 levels (mean value, from 351 pg/mL to 676 pg/mL after 24 hours) also increased in eight patients after the third administration. During the treatment course, the percentage of T-bet-expressing CD8+ T cells gradually increased (mean, 49.8% at baseline and 59.1% at day 29, p = 0.0273). Interestingly, both T-bet-expressing effector memory (mean, 52.7% at baseline and 63.7% at day 29, p = 0.0195) and terminally differentiated effector memory (mean, 82.3% at baseline and 90.0% at day 29, p = 0.0039) CD8+ T cells significantly increased. The median PFS was 398 days. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first clinical study showing that CpG ODN (K3) activated innate immunity and elicited Th1-type adaptive immune response and cytotoxic activity in cancer patients. CpG ODN (K3) was well tolerated at the dose settings tested, although the maximum tolerated dose was not determined. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN-CTR number 000023276. Registered 1 September 2016, https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000026649.

A hybrid design for dose-finding oncology clinical trials.

Identifying the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommending a Phase II dose for an investigational treatment is crucial in cancer drug development. A suboptimal dose often leads to a failed late-stage trial, while an overly toxic dose causes harm to patients. There is a very rich literature on trial designs for dose-finding oncology clinical trials. We propose a novel hybrid design that maximizes the merits and minimizes the limitations of the existing designs. Building on two existing dose-finding designs: a model-assisted design (the modified toxicity probability interval) and a dose-toxicity model-based design, a hybrid design of the modified toxicity probability interval design and a dose-toxicity model such as the logistic regression model is proposed, incorporating optimal properties from these existing approaches. The performance of the hybrid design was tested in a real trial example and through simulation scenarios. The hybrid design controlled the overdosing toxicity well and led to a recommended dose closer to the true MTD due to its ability to calibrate for an intermediate dose. The robust performance of the proposed hybrid design is illustrated through the real trial dataset and simulations. The simulation results demonstrated that the proposed hybrid design can achieve excellent and robust operating characteristics compared to other existing designs and can be an effective model for determining the MTD and recommended Phase II dose in oncology dose-finding trials. For practical feasibility, an R-shiny tool was developed and is freely available to guide clinicians in every step of the dose finding process.

RESIRT: A Phase 1 Study of Selective Internal Radiation Therapy Using Yttrium-90 Resin Microspheres in Patients With Primary Renal Cell Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is a potential treatment of primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) deemed unsuitable for conventional therapy. RESIRT is the first-in-human study to evaluate safety and feasibility of SIRT for primary RCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with RCC, unsuitable for, or who declined conventional therapy, were eligible. A single transfemoral micro-catheter administration of yttrium-90 (Y-90) resin microspheres (SIR-Spheres) was delivered super selectively via the renal artery to the tumour at intended radiation doses of 75, 100, 150, 200, 300 Gy and a final cohort with a procedural endpoint of "imminent stasis," in a dose-escalation design. Post-SIRT follow-up was 12 months. Study endpoints included safety and toxicity 30-days and 12-months post-SIRT and tumour response (RECIST v1.1). RESULTS: In total, 21 patients were enrolled, mean (SD) age was 75 (9.3) years, WHO performance status was 0 in 81%, 12 (57%) had stage 3 chronic kidney disease, and 7 (33%) had prior contralateral nephrectomy. Overall, 71% of patients completed 12 months of follow-up. Intended doses were delivered without any dose-limiting toxicity. Seventeen out of 21 (81%) patients experienced an adverse event (AE) from any cause within 30 days post-SIRT; all SIRT-related AEs were grade 1 to 2. Best overall tumour responses were partial response 1/21 (4.8%), stable disease 19/21 (90.5%) and progressive disease 1/21 (4.8%). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated good tolerability of SIRT at all dose levels including "imminent stasis" in treating primary tumours in RCC patients otherwise unsuitable for conventional therapy. SIRT with Y-90 resin microspheres may be a feasible treatment option for RCC.

ACO/ARO/AIO-21 - Capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy in combination with the IL-1 receptor antagonist anakinra for rectal cancer Patients: A phase I trial of the German rectal cancer study group.

Purpose: Recent advances in the treatment algorithm of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) have significantly improved complete response (CR) rates and disease-free survival (DFS), but therapy resistance, with its substantial impact on outcomes and survival, remains a major challenge. Our group has recently unraveled a critical role of interleukin-1α (IL-1α) signaling in activating inflammatory cancer-associated fibroblasts (iCAFs) and mediating radiation-induced senescence, extracellular matrix (ECM) accumulation, and ultimately therapy resistance. We here summarize the recently initiated ACO/ARO/AIO-21 phase I trial, testing the IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1 RA) anakinra in combination with fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for advanced rectal cancer. Methods/Design: The ACO/ARO/AIO-21 is an investigator-driven, prospective, open-labeled phase I drug-repurposing trial assessing the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of capecitabine administered concurrently to standard preoperative radiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions followed by 9 Gy boost in 5 fractions) in combination with fixed doses of the IL1-RA anakinra (100 mg, days -10 to 30). Capecitabine will be administered using a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design (500 mg/m2 bid; 650 mg/m2 bid; 825 mg/m2 bid, respectively) from day 1 to day 30. Response assessment including digital rectal examination (DRE), endoscopy and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is scheduled 10 weeks after completion of CRT. For patients achieving clinical complete response (cCR), primary non-operative management is provided. In case of non-cCR immediate total mesorectal excision (TME) will be performed. Primary endpoint of this phase I trial is the MTD of capecitabine. Discussion: Based on extensive preclinical research, the ACO/ARO/AIO-21 phase I trial will assess whether the IL-1RA anakinra can be safely combined with fluoropyrimidine-based CRT in rectal cancer. It will further explore the potential of IL-1 inhibition to overcome therapy resistance and improve response rates. A comprehensive translational research program will expand our understanding from a clinical perspective and may help translate the results into a randomized phase II trial.

Phase I study of trametinib in combination with whole brain radiation therapy for brain metastases.

INTRODUCTION: Trametinib is a MEK inhibitor with intracranial activity indicated for BRAF-mutant metastatic malignancies. Yet, the safety of trametinib concurrent with whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is unknown. We performed a single-institution, prospective, 3 + 3, phase I clinical trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of trametinib with WBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with brain metastases (BM) received daily trametinib for 28 days, starting 7 days prior to and continuing through WBRT (37.5 Gy/15 fractions). Dose levels (DL)1-3 were 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mg. The MTD of trametinib plus WBRT, the max dose where ≤1 of 6 patients experienced a dose limiting toxicity (DLT), was the primary endpoint. RESULTS: 10 patients were enrolled (median age-59 [47-64], BM-5 [1-10], 50% melanoma). Three and 7 patients were assigned to DL1 and 2. One DL2 patient withdrew. 89% of remaining patients completed therapy per protocol, but 1 DL2 patient with systemic progression discontinued therapy at 30 Gy. Thirteen grade (G)3-4 toxicities were observed, of which 12 occurred at DL2 (4/6 of patients). DLT was reached at DL2 (G4 thrombocytopenia and G3 diarrhea, 1 each). There were no G5 toxicities. Median overall survival was 2.2 months. During the study period, changing practice patterns favored utilization of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Thus, the trial closed early prior to completion. CONCLUSIONS: In a patient population representative of modern candidates for WBRT, trametinib plus WBRT is highly toxic with a MTD <1.5 mg. The safety of trametinib with SRS remains an important question for future study.

FOLFIRINOX as First-line Chemotherapy in Japanese Patients Suffering from Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer (KOBE FOLFIRINOX Study).

Background/Aim: FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin, irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin) combination chemotherapy is the gold-standard therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer. In this study, FOLFIRINOX dosages for Japanese patients were established enabling FOLFIRINOX therapy optimization for efficient use. Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were treated with varying doses of FOLFIRINOX to determine the optimum dosage for highest remission outcomes with the least post-chemotherapy toxicities. Results: Patients given 180 mg of irinotecan and a 400 mg bolus of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) showed a marked difference in outcome when compared to irinotecan 180 mg given without the 5-FU bolus, with the overall response rate being 28%, a survival time of 6.4 months and progression-free survival time of 4.5 months. Conclusion: The optimum dose of FOLFIRINOX was a dosage combination of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m 2 , irinotecan 180 mg/m 2 , l-leucovorin 400 mg/m 2  and 5-FU 2,400 mg/m 2 , administered as a continuous 46-h infusion.

A Brief Overview of Adaptive Designs for Phase I Cancer Trials.

Phase I studies are used to estimate the dose-toxicity profile of the drugs and to select appropriate doses for successive studies. However, literature on statistical methods used for phase I studies are extensive. The objective of this review is to provide a concise summary of existing and emerging techniques for selecting dosages that are appropriate for phase I cancer trials. Many advanced statistical studies have proposed novel and robust methods for adaptive designs that have shown significant advantages over conventional dose finding methods. An increasing number of phase I cancer trials use adaptive designs, particularly during the early phases of the study. In this review, we described nonparametric and algorithm-based designs such as traditional 3 + 3, accelerated titration, Bayesian algorithm-based design, up-and-down design, and isotonic design. In addition, we also described parametric model-based designs such as continual reassessment method, escalation with overdose control, and Bayesian decision theoretic and optimal design. Ongoing studies have been continuously focusing on improving and refining the existing models as well as developing newer methods. This study would help readers to assimilate core concepts and compare different phase I statistical methods under one banner. Nevertheless, other evolving methods require future reviews.

Exposure driven dose escalation design with overdose control: Concept and first real life experience in an oncology phase I trial.

BACKGROUND: Escalation With Overdose Control (EWOC) designs are increasingly used to ensure dose-toxicity curve of investigational oncology drugs is efficiently characterized during dose escalation steps. We propose a novel EWOC-based method that integrates the longitudinal pharmacokinetic (PK) data of individual patients in a Bayesian forecasting exposure-safety framework. METHODS: The method, called exposure-driven EWOC (ED-EWOC), relies on a population PK model coupled with a Bayesian logistic regression model to make dose recommendation for the next cohort of patients. RESULTS: We applied ED-EWOC to a real oncology clinical trial in parallel to a traditional EWOC approach. We found that for comparable priors, ED-EWOC dose recommendations were equivalent to the one suggested by EWOC when PK is dose proportional with low inter-individual variability. CONCLUSION: This case example demonstrates that ED-EWOC is logistically feasible during a trial conduct when PK bioanalysis can be expedited in the dose escalation phase. Overall, we anticipate that exposure-guided Bayesian designs could benefit patients and drug developers to identify the optimal dose steps of novel compounds entering the clinic with suspected liability in PK or that exhibit large inter-individual variability.

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of the anti-CEACAM5-DM4 antibody-drug conjugate tusamitamab ravtansine (SAR408701) in patients with advanced solid tumors: first-in-human dose-escalation study.

BACKGROUND: Tusamitamab ravtansine (SAR408701) is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule-5 (CEACAM5) and a cytotoxic maytansinoid that selectively targets CEACAM5-expressing tumor cells. In this phase I dose-escalation study, we evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor activity of tusamitamab ravtansine in patients with solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years, had locally advanced/metastatic solid tumors that expressed or were likely to express CEACAM5, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 or 1. Patients were treated with ascending doses of tusamitamab ravtansine intravenously every 2 weeks (Q2W). The first three dose levels (5, 10, and 20 mg/m2) were evaluated using an accelerated escalation protocol, after which an adaptive Bayesian procedure was used. The primary endpoint was the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during the first two cycles, graded using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v4.03 criteria. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients received tusamitamab ravtansine (range 5-150 mg/m2). The DLT population comprised 28 patients; DLTs (reversible grade 3 microcystic keratopathy) occurred in three of eight patients treated with tusamitamab ravtansine 120 mg/m2 and in two of three patients treated with 150 mg/m2. The maximum tolerated dose was identified as 100 mg/m2. Twenty-two patients (71%) experienced ≥1 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), seven patients (22.6%) experienced ≥1 treatment-related grade ≥3 TEAE, and three patients (9.7%) discontinued treatment due to TEAEs. The most common TEAEs were asthenia, decreased appetite, keratopathy, and nausea. Three patients had confirmed partial responses. The mean plasma exposure of tusamitamab ravtansine increased in a dose-proportional manner from 10 to 150 mg/m2. CONCLUSIONS: Tusamitamab ravtansine had a favorable safety profile with reversible, dose-related keratopathy as the DLT. Based on the overall safety profile, pharmacokinetic data, and Bayesian model recommendations, the maximum tolerated dose of tusamitamab ravtansine was defined as 100 mg/m2 Q2W.

Phase I study of CBM.CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cell in the treatment of refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in Chinese patients.

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has shown impressive efficacy in treating B-cell malignancies. A single-center phase I dose-escalation study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of T cells transduced with CBM.CD19 CAR, a second-generation anti-CD19 CAR bearing 4-1BB costimulatory molecule, for the treatment of patients with refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Ten heavily treated patients with refractory DLBCL were given CBM.CD19 CAR-T cell (C-CAR011) treatment. The overall response rate was 20% and 50% at 4 and 12 weeks after the infusion of C-CAR011, respectively, and the disease control rate was 60% at 12 weeks after infusion. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in all patients. The incidence of cytokine release syndrome in all grades and grade ⩾ 3 was 90% and 0, respectively, which is consistent with the safety profile of axicabtagene ciloleucel and tisagenlecleucel. Neurotoxicity or other dose-limiting toxicities was not observed in any dose cohort of C-CAR011 therapy. Antitumor efficacy was apparent across dose cohorts. Therefore, C-CAR011 is a safe and effective therapeutic option for Chinese patients with refractory DLBCL, and further large-scale clinical trials are warranted.

The association of cisplatin pharmacokinetics and skeletal muscle mass in patients with head and neck cancer: The prospective PLATISMA study.

BACKGROUND: Locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is commonly treated with cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Cisplatin is associated with severe toxicity, which negatively affects survival. In recent years, a relationship between low skeletal muscle mass (SMM) and increased toxicity has been described. This increased toxicity may be related to altered cisplatin distribution and binding in the fat-free body mass of which SMM is the largest contributor. This study aims to investigate the association between cisplatin pharmacokinetics and SMM in patients with HNSCC. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study in patients with HNSCC treated with CRT. Patients received standard-of-care chemotherapy with three cycles of cisplatin at a dose of 100 mg/m2 per cycle. Quantitative data on SMM, measured on computed tomography scans and cisplatin pharmacokinetics (total and ultrafilterable plasma concentrations) were collected, as well as data on toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 45 evaluable patients were included in the study. A large proportion of the study population had a low SMM (46.7%). The majority of patients (57.8%) experienced cisplatin dose-limiting toxicities. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed a significant relationship between cisplatin pharmacokinetics and SMM, weight, fat-free mass and body surface area (p < 0.005). In a simulation, patients with a low SMM (<25.8 kg) were predicted to reach higher-bound cisplatin concentrations. CONCLUSION: We found an association between cisplatin pharmacokinetics and SMM; however, this relationship was also seen between cisplatin pharmacokinetics and other body composition descriptors.

Sarcopenia assessment by new EWGSOP2 criteria for predicting chemotherapy dose-limiting toxicity in patients with gastrointestinal tract tumors.

INTRODUCTION: In 2019, The EWGSOP2 group made updates on the definition and diagnosis of sarcopenia. The aim of this study is to determine the possible risk factors for chemotherapy dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). METHODS: Newly diagnosed gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients were included in this prospective observational study. Chemotherapy DLTs were recorded in patients receiving platinum-based therapy. The patients were divided into two groups according to the current sarcopenia criteria. RESULTS: 75 patients were included in the final analysis. Chemotherapy DLT occurred in 52% (n = 39) of all patients who received platinum-based chemotherapy. DLT rates were 78.9% and 42.9% in sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients, respectively (p = 0.007). According to the results of the multivariate analysis, the only sarcopenia was found as a statistically significant risk factor for DLT. CONCLUSION: Assessment of sarcopenia evaluated with the current EWGSOP2 diagnostic criteria is useful in predicting chemotherapy DLT development in patients with a diagnosis of GI cancer. In the future, current EWGSOP2 recommendations should be considered while designing a study investigating the correlation between sarcopenia and chemotoxicity.