Outpatient prescription of clozapine in Colombia: factors related to the use of doses lower than 100 mg/day / Prescripción ambulatoria de clozapina en Colombia: factores relacionados con el uso de dosis inferiores a 100 mg/día.

Although commonly used in clinical practice, scientific literature about clozapine prescription patterns in Colombia is scarce. A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in an outpatient clinic in Bogotá, Colombia. Between 2016 and 2018, clozapine was prescribed to 2603 patients, mainly for Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders and Bipolar and Depressive Disorders, at a median dose of 100mg/day. After controlling for other variables, older age was the only variable that explained the use of doses lower than 100mg/day. Clozapine was not only used for Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia, and further studies are needed to explain these differences.

Aunque se utiliza comúnmente en la práctica clínica, la literatura científica sobre los patrones de prescripción de clozapina en Colombia es escasa. Se realizó un estudio observacional transversal en el servicio ambulatorio de una clínica de referencia en Bogotá, Colombia. Entre 2016 y 2018, se recetó clozapina a 2603 pacientes, principalmente para esquizofrenia y trastornos relacionados, trastorno afectivo bipolar y trastornos depresivos, a una dosis media de 100 mg/día. Después de controlar otras variables, la edad avanzada fue la única variable que explicó el uso de dosis inferiores a 100 mg/día. La clozapina no se utilizó sólo para la esquizofrenia resistente al tratamiento, y se necesitan estudios adicionales para explicar estas diferencias.

Conhecimento de estudantes de Odontologia sobre prescrição e o uso de medicamentos / Conocimientos de los estudiantes de Odontología sobre prescripción y uso de medicamentos / Knowledge of Dentistry students about prescription and use of drugs

This study aimed to analyze the knowledge of 335 dentistry students about prescription and use of drugs. The participants were divided into two groups: Group I -composed of 136 students in the last period/semester of the Dentistry course and Group II -composed of 199 students who had recently completed the discipline of Pharmacology/Therapeutics Applied to Dentistry (second semester of graduation). Students answered a questionnaire with 19 closed questions divided into three blocks of interest, Block A (5questions about their academic background); Block B (4 questions about legislation and drug prescription) and Block C (10 questions about common prescription in cases of increased risk due to comorbidities in Dentistry). The instrument was validated afterthe application of three pilot studies in 60 volunteer students who had recently completed the Pharmacology/Therapeutics Applied to Dentistry discipline. The results allowed classifying the level of knowledge as bad, moderate, good or excellent according to the stratification adopted by the authors. Most of the students interviewed were female, 22 years old. According to the results, 70% of the participants stated that the duration of the Pharmacology/Therapeutics Applied to Dentistry course was insufficient for them to feel safe when prescribing medications. The data presented showed that in block "B" only 19% of the students knew who was responsible for the prescription document. Additionally, 57% identified the mandatory items on an antimicrobial prescription. The successful rate of block "C" showed that the participants presented reasonable knowledge of most of the questions related to indication and prescription of medication both in regular and risky situations in Dentistry. The student's average knowledge regarding the indication and prescription of drugs reveals a problem in academic qualification related to drug therapy. It also highlights the need for continuing education of dental surgeons (AU).

Este estudio tuvo como objetivo analizar los conocimientos de 335 estudiantes de odontología sobre la prescripción y uso de medicamentos. Los participantes fueron divididos en dos grupos: Grupo I -compuesto por 136 estudiantes del último período/semestre de la carrera de Odontología y Grupo II -compuesto por 199 estudiantes que habían finalizado recientemente la disciplina de Farmacología/Terapéutica Aplicada a la Odontología (segundo semestre de pregrado). Los estudiantes respondieron un cuestionario con19 preguntas cerradas divididas en tres bloques de interés, Bloque A (5 preguntas sobre su formación académica); Bloque B (4 preguntas sobre legislación y prescripción de medicamentos) y Bloque C (10 preguntas sobre prescripción común en casos de mayor riesgo por comorbilidades en Odontología). El instrumento fue validado luego de la aplicación de tres estudios piloto en 60 estudiantes voluntarios que habían finalizado recientemente la disciplina Farmacología/Terapéutica Aplicada a la Odontología. Los resultados permitieron clasificar el nivel de conocimientos como malo, moderado, bueno o excelente según la estratificación adoptada por los autores. La mayoría de los estudiantes entrevistados eran mujeres, de 22 años. Según los resultados, el 70% de los participantes afirmó que la duración del curso de Farmacología/Terapéutica Aplicada a la Odontología fue insuficiente para sentirse seguros al prescribir medicamentos. Los datos presentados mostraron que en el bloque "B" sólo el 19% de los estudiantes sabían quién era el responsable del documento de prescripción. Además, el 57% identificó los artículos obligatorios en la prescripción de antimicrobianos. La tasa de éxito del bloque "C" demostró que los participantes presentaron conocimientos razonables en la mayoría de las cuestiones relacionadas con la indicación y prescripción de medicamentos tanto en situaciones habituales como de riesgo en Odontología. El conocimiento medio del estudiante sobre la indicación y prescripción de medicamentos revela un problema en la calificación académica relacionada con la farmacoterapia. También destaca la necesidad de una educación continua de los cirujanos dentistas (AU).

Este estudo teve como objetivo analisar o conhecimento de 335 estudantes de Odontologia sobre prescrição e uso de medicamentos. Os participantes foram divididos em dois grupos: Grupo I -composto por 136 alunos do último período/semestre do curso de Odontologia e o Grupo II -composto por 199 alunos que haviam concluído recentemente a disciplina de Terapêutica Medicamentosa/Farmacologia (segundo semestre da graduação). Os estudantes responderam a um questionário com 19 perguntas fechadas dividido emtrês blocos de interesse, Bloco A (5 perguntas sobre sua formação acadêmica); Bloco B (4 perguntas sobre legislação e prescrição de medicamentos) e Bloco C (10 perguntas sobre prescrição comum em casos de risco aumentado por comorbidade em Odontologia). Oinstrumento foi validado após a aplicação de três estudos piloto em 60 alunos voluntários que recentemente haviam concluído a disciplina de Terapêutica Medicamentosa/Farmacologia. Os resultados permitiram classificar o nível de conhecimento como ruim, moderado, bom ou excelente de acordo com a estratificação adotada pelos autores. A maioria dos alunos entrevistados era do sexo feminino, com 22 anos de idade. De acordo com os resultados, 70% dos participantes afirmaram que a duração da disciplina Farmacologia/Terapêutica Aplicada à Odontologia foi insuficiente para que se sentissem seguros ao prescrever medicamentos. Os dados apresentados mostraram que no bloco "B" apenas 19% dos alunos sabiam quem é o responsável pelo documento de prescrição. Além disso, 57% identificaram os itens obrigatórios em uma prescrição antimicrobiana. O índice de sucesso do bloco "C" mostrou que os participantes apresentaram conhecimento razoável envolvendo as questões sobre indicação e prescrição de medicamentos tanto em situaçõesregulares quanto em situações de risco na Odontologia. O conhecimento médio dos alunos quanto à indicação e prescrição de medicamentos revela um problema na formação acadêmica relacionada à terapia medicamentosa (AU).

Evaluation of Potential Urologic Prescription Drug Savings With Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company.

INTRODUCTION: Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company (MCCPDC) launched in 2022 with a goal to decrease prescription drug costs. Thus far, research has focused on possible savings if Medicare purchased its annual volume of drugs at MCCPDC prices. The aim of this study is to analyze if MCCPDC can offer savings directly to urologic patients compared with other mail-order pharmacies, local pharmacies, and with patients using health insurance. METHODS: Twelve drugs used to treat urological diseases available on MCCPDC were analyzed. Pricing data of 30-tab and 90-tab prescriptions from MCCPDC, other mail-order pharmacies, and local in-person pharmacies near our zip code 40508 (Lexington, Kentucky) were compiled. To compare if MCCPDC could offer savings to patients using health insurance to fill their prescriptions, out-of-pocket drug costs for patients from the 2020 and 2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey and the 2021 Medicare Part D spending data were extracted. RESULTS: Greater savings at MCCPDC were found at 90-tab prescriptions, but overall variability in prices existed. When comparing without health insurance, 9 of 12 drugs at MCCPDC were cheaper at 90 tabs with solifenacin and tadalafil saving $20 and $12 per prescription. When considering patients using insurance, abiraterone, sildenafil, and tadalafil offered savings on out-of-pocket costs at 30- and 90-tab prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS: MCCPDC may offer cheaper prices for patients filling urologic medications, especially at 90-tab prescriptions. This study is the first to show patients could save money using MCCPDC and has implications for physician counseling when prescribing common urologic drugs.

Prescripción de insulina Neutral Protamine Hagedorn en Atención Primaria de Salud, municipio Santa Clara, 2023

Introducción: La diabetes es una enfermedad de carácter crónico, que se origina cuando el organismo pierde su capacidad de producir insulina necesaria para utilizarla de manera eficaz. La diabetes mellitus tipo 1 se caracteriza por la destrucción autoinmune de las células beta del páncreas, que conlleva a una deficiente producción de insulina. Mientras que, la diabetes mellitus tipo 2 resulta de la combinación de resistencia a la insulina junto con inadecuada secreción de la misma. En ambos casos, se utiliza el medicamento insulina para garantizar un control de la enfermedad. Objetivo: Caracterizar la prescripción del medicamento insulina Neutral Protamine Hagedorn bulbo, en una farmacia comunitaria perteneciente a la Atención Primaria de Salud del municipio Santa Clara. Métodos: Se realizó una investigación observacional, descriptiva y transversal, que se corresponde con un estudio de uso de medicamentos del tipo prescripción-indicación del medicamento insulina Neutral Protamine Hagedorn bulbo en septiembre 2023. El universo estuvo conformado por 852 pacientes, que tenían prescripción por certificado para medicamentos controlados vigentes. La muestra no probabilística quedó conformada por 26 pacientes. El tipo de muestreo fue aleatorio simple y los resultados se presentaron en tablas mediante números absolutos y porcentaje. Se respetó el principio a la confidencialidad de la información revisada y los certificados para medicamentos controlados. Resultados: Predominaron los pacientes del sexo femenino (76,92 %), mayores de 50 años (84,62 %), hipertensión arterial como comorbilidad (76,92 %), presentaban cuatro o más medicamentos (61,54 %) y la combinación con glibenclamida, metformina, enalapril, captopril, carvedilol, ácido acetilsalicílico, hidroclorotiazida y levotiroxina sódica fueron las interacciones medicamentosas de mayor importancia clínica. Conclusiones: La frecuencia en la prescripción de insulina Neutral Protamine Hagedorn bulbo, es similar a la encontrada en algunos estudios previos, es más representativa a partir de la quinta década de la vida y más frecuente en el sexo femenino.

Introduction: Diabetes is a disease of a chronic nature which occurs when the body loses its ability to produce the insulin needed to use it effectively. Type 1 diabetes mellitus is characterized by destruction of pancreatic beta cells in genetically predisposed individuals and the consequent deficiency in insulin production while type 2 diabetes mellitus results from the combination of insulin resistance along with inadequate secretion of it. In both cases, the insulin medication is used to ensure control of the disease. Objective: To characterize the prescription profile of Neutral Protamine Hagedorn insulin vial in Santa Clara Community Pharmacy. Methods: An observational, retrospective, descriptive and cross-sectional investigation was conducted that corresponded with a medications use study, of prescription-indication type of the medication Neutral Protamine Hagedorn insulin vial in September 2023. The universe was 852 patients and the sample was 26 patients with NPH insulin vial prescription, the sampling was simple random and the results were presented in tables using absolute numbers and percentages. The principle of confidentiality of the reviewed information and certificates for controlled medications was respected. Results: The female sex predominated (76.92 %), older than 50 years (84.62 %), arterial hypertension as a comorbidity (76.92 %), 4 or more medications (61.54 %) and the combination with glibenclamide, metformin, enalapril, captopril, carvedilol, acetylsalicylic acid, hydrochlorothiazide and levothyroxine sodium were the most clinically important drug interactions. Conclusions: The prevalence in the prescription of Neutral Protamine Hagedorn insulin vial is similar to that found in some previous studies, being more representative from the 5th decade of life and more frequent in the female sex.

Prescrição, oferta e acesso aos medicamentos para disfunção erétil: um paradoxo na saúde pública? / Prescription, offer and access to medications for erectile dysfunction: a paradox in public health?

Resumo Trata-se de um artigo embasado em opinião que procura refletir sobre o antagonismo estabelecido entre a Política Nacional de Atenção Integral à Saúde do Homem (PNAISH) com o recorte específico para DE (Disfunção Erétil) direcionado ao acesso de medicamentos. É notório que a PNAISH apresenta objetivos que vão além da saúde sexual e reprodutiva, sobretudo, mesmo após 13 anos de sua publicação, não houve incorporação de medicamentos para tratar DE no âmbito SUS. O artigo foi desenvolvido com base no cenário observado no dia a dia de atendimento aos pacientes que recebem cuidados no Serviço Ambulatorial da Saúde Masculina de um Hospital de Alta Complexidade. Isto por constatar a dificuldade dos médicos em prescreverem medicamentos para DE, por ausência de padronização no contexto SUS. Importante ressaltar, nesta perspectiva, que a prescrição de medicamentos no âmbito SUS deve seguir fidedignamente a Rename; conforme preconiza o Decreto 7.508 e, se atentar à Resolução SS-83 de 2015, vigente no estado de São Paulo. Ela estabelece que o custo da dispensação de medicamentos não contemplados na Rename, por meio da judicialização, prescritos por médico da rede estadual de saúde, poderá ser custeado pela instituição ao qual este esteja vinculado.

Abstract This is an opinion-based article that aims to reflect on the antagonism established between the National Policy of Integral Attention to Men's Health (PNAISH) with specific focus on ED (Erectile Dysfunction), directed to access to medication. It is well-known that PNAISH presents objectives that go beyond sexual and reproductive health, especially, even after 13 years of its publication, since there was no incorporation of medications to treat ED within the SUS. This article was developed based on the scenario observed in the daily care of patients who undergo treatment in the Men's Health Outpatient Service of a High-Complexity Hospital. According to this perspective, it is important to emphasize, that the prescription of medications within the SUS should faithfully follow the Rename; as recommended by Decree 7,508, observing the Resolution SS-83 of 2015, in the state of São Paulo. This establishes that the cost of dispensing medications not included in the SUS pharmaceutical assistance protocols, through judicialization, prescribed by a physician in the state health network, may be funded by the institution to which this physician is affiliated.

Prescription of off-label and unlicensed medication for newborns hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit / Prescrição de medicamentos off-label e não licenciados para neonatos hospitalizados na Unidade de Terapia Intensiva

ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the prevalence of off-label and unlicensed prescriptions for a population of neonates admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in a hospital in southern Santa Catarina. Methods: Observational study with a cross-sectional design. All neonates admitted to the Intensive Care Unit during the period from March 2020 to March 2021 were included. Data collection was performed through a questionnaire made by the authors and the classification of drugs based on the Electronic Drug Description (Bulário Eletrônico) of the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency and Drug Dex-Micromedex. Results: Data from 296 neonates were evaluated. The prevalence was 50,7% for prescribing off-label medications and 37,2% for unlicensed medications. The use of drugs was higher in preterm neonates, with low birth weight, 1st minute Apgar between 6-8, 5th minute Apgar between 7-8, and in need of invasive procedures. The most used off-label drugs were ampicillin, gentamicin and fentanyl (92.6, 92.0 and 26.6%, respectively), whereas the most used unlicensed drugs were caffeine, phenobarbital and bromopride (78.1, 16.3 and 10.9%, respectively). Conclusions: This study showed a large percentage of prescriptions made in the off-label (50.7%) and unlicensed (37.2%) form in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, corroborating the worrying world scenario. The most exposed neonates were precisely the most vulnerable ones and, among the most commonly prescribed medications, ampicillin and gentamicin stood out in off-label form and caffeine in unlicensed form.

RESUMO Objetivo: Analisar a prevalência de prescrições off-label e não licenciadas uma população de neonatos internados na Unidade de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal em um hospital ao sul de Santa Catarina. Métodos: Estudo observacional com delineamento transversal. Foram incluídos todos os neonatos admitidos na Unidade de Terapia Intensiva durante o período de março de 2020 a março de 2021. A coleta de dados foi realizada a partir de questionário elaborado pelos autores, e a classificação dos medicamentos, com base no Bulário Eletrônico da Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária e no Drug Dex-Micromedex. Resultados: Foram avaliados dados de 296 neonatos. A prevalência foi de 50,7% para prescrição de medicações off-label e 37,2% para medicações não licenciadas. O uso dos fármacos foi maior em neonatos pré-termo, com baixo peso ao nascer, Apgar de 1o minuto entre 6-8, Apgar de 5o minuto entre 7-8, e com necessidade de procedimentos invasivos. Os fármacos off-label mais utilizados foram a ampicilina, gentamicina e fentanil (92,6, 92 e 26,6%, respectivamente), já os fármacos não licenciados mais utilizados foram a cafeína, fenobarbital e bromoprida (78,1, 16,3 e 10,9%, respectivamente). Conclusões: O estudo demonstrou grande porcentagem de prescrições realizadas de forma off-label (50,7%) e não licenciada (37,2%) na Unidade de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal de análise, corroborando o preocupante cenário mundial. Os neonatos mais expostos foram justamente aqueles mais vulneráveis e, entre as medicações mais utilizadas, destacam-se a ampicilina e a gentamicina de modo off-label e a cafeína de modo não licenciado.

Multidrug stewardship and adherence to guidelines in >200,000 direct-to-consumer Telemedicine encounters

ABSTRACT Objective: The quality of care and safety for Telemedicine-discharged patients with suspected respiratory infections are closely related to low rates of prescriptions of unjustified and high-risk medications. This retrospective study aimed to assess adherence to the current COVID-19 guidelines in direct-to-consumer telemedicine encounters at a large center using multidrug stewardship protocols. Methods: A quarterly electronic survey utilizing medical records of individual physician care assessed various quality indicators. Physicians received ongoing adaptive feedback based on personal metrics, with Telemedicine Center recommendations derived from the 2020 Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines. The study included all consecutive adults with new respiratory symptoms in the last 14 days who sought spontaneous Telemedicine consultations between March 2020 and August 2021. This study analyzed patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 and other airway infections. Results: Of the 221,128 evaluated patients, 42,042 (19%) had confirmed COVID-19; 104,021 (47%) were suspected to have COVID-19; and, 75,065 (33%) had other diagnoses. Patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 had a mean (+DP) age of 35±12 years. A total of 125,107 (85.65%) patients were managed at home, 2,552 (1.74%) were referred for non-urgent in-office reassessment, and 17,185 (11.7%) were referred to the emergency department for whom there was no further treatment recommendation. The antibiotic rate in confirmed or suspected COVID-19 cases was 0.46%/0.65% and that for non-evidence-based prescriptions was 0.01%/0.005%. Conclusion: Guideline training and Telemedicine consultation feedback may lead to lower antibiotic and antimicrobial prescriptions in suspected and confirmed COVID-19 cases. Multidrug stewardship protocols may improve guideline adherence and reinforce the quality of care and safety in Telemedicine encounters.

Uso de inhaladores para la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica en un grupo de pacientes colombianos

Introducción: En Colombia son escasos los datos sobre el uso de los inhaladores en pacientes con EPOC. Objetivo: Describir la técnica de uso de inhaladores de dosis medida y polvo seco en pacientes de un hospital colombiano. Materiales y métodos: Estudio descriptivo en pacientes mayores de 40 años con EPOC atendidos en un hospital en La Virginia, Risaralda, Colombia, entre el 1 de septiembre de 2019 al 31 de enero de 2020. La unidad de análisis fueron los pacientes. Se incluyeron variables sociodemográficas, clínicas y lista de chequeo para uso de inhaladores. Se aplicaron frecuencias y proporciones para variables discretas, estadísticas de tendencia central y dispersión para variables continuas. Resultados: Se incluyeron 104 pacientes con edad media de 73,6 ± 10,1 años; 57 eran mujeres (54,8 %). Además, 48 pacientes estaban clasificados como GOLD-D (46,2 %). Igualmente, 89 pacientes manifestaron haber recibido educación sobre el uso de broncodilatadores (85,6 %). Los más frecuentes fueron los inhaladores de dosis medida (DM) en 95 casos (91,3 %), seguido de los de polvo seco unidosis (7,7 %). Así mismo, 37 pacientes que usaron DM sin inhalocámara (35,6 %) no cumplieron los pasos de la lista de chequeo. En el sistema multidosis, el más realizado fue cerrar de manera adecuada el inhalador y el menos ejecutado, expulsar el aire lentamente evitando hacerlo cerca del inhalador (n = 6; 5,7 %). Discusión: Se lograron describir las características de la técnica de uso de los inhaladores en pacientes con EPOC. A pesar de que ningún paciente logró utilizar el inhalador de forma "perfecta", la mayoría han recibido educación por parte de los profesionales de la salud. Conclusión: Un alto porcentaje de pacientes usa inadecuadamente los dispositivos para suministrar los broncodilatadores. Esto puede impactar negativamente en el control de la enfermedad.

Introduction: In Colombia, there is limited data on the use of inhalers in patients with COPD. Objective: The objective was to describe the technique of using metered-dose inhalers and dry powder in patients in a Colombian hospital. Methods: Observational, descriptive study of patients over 40 years of age with COPD, treated in a hospital in La Virginia, Risaralda, Colombia, between September 1st, 2019 and January 31st, 2020. The unit of analysis were patients in consultation. Sociodemographic and clinical variables, and a checklist for use of inhalers were included. Frequencies and proportions were applied for discrete variables, statistics of central tendency and dispersion for continuous variables. Results: A total of 104 patients with an average age of 73.6 ± 10.1 years were included; 57 were women (54.8%). In addition, 48 patients were classified as GOLD-D (46.2%). Similarly, 89 patients reported having received education on the use of bronchodilators (85.6%). The most common were metered-dose (MD) inhalers in 95 cases (91.3%), followed by single-dose dry powder inhalers in eight patients (7.7%). Likewise, 37 patients who used DM without inhalochamber (35.6%) did not comply with the steps of the checklist. In the multidose system, the most performed was to properly close the inhaler and the least performed was to expel the air slowly, avoiding doing so near the inhaler (n=6; 5.7%). Discussion: The characteristics of the technique of using inhalers in patients with COPD were described. Although no patient was able to use the inhaler "perfectly", most have received education from health professionals. Conclusion: A high percentage of patients misuse the devices to deliver bronchodilators. This can negatively impact the control of the disease.

Prescripción de fármacos cardiotóxicos en pacientes con enfermedades cardiovasculares / Prescription of cardiotoxic drugs in patients with cardiovascular diseases

Introducción: El uso de fármacos con potencial cardiotóxico para tratar enfermedades no cardiovasculares coexistentes resulta un agravante evitable. Objetivo: Evaluar la prescripción de 5 fármacos cardiotóxicos en pacientes con enfermedades cardiovasculares. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo transversal (enmarcado en los estudios de utilización de medicamentos) de marzo a diciembre de 2020 en el Policlínico Santa Cruz (Artemisa, Cuba), en una población de 234 sujetos con enfermedades cardiovasculares que habían sido tratados con domperidona, azitromicina, ciprofloxacina, ibuprofeno y diclofenaco. Las variables estudiadas fueron: sexo, edad, consumo de fármacos cardiotóxicos, motivo de indicación, enfermedades cardiovasculares, forma farmacéutica, dosis diaria, intervalo de las dosis y duración del tratamiento. Se realizó un análisis estadístico descriptivo. Resultados: Los fármacos más prescritos fueron la azitromicina (n= 63), el ibuprofeno (n= 59) y la ciprofloxacina (n= 57). Sus principales motivos de indicación fueron, respectivamente, la neumonía adquirida en la comunidad (38,1 por ciento), las infecciones de piel y tejidos blandos (28,8 por ciento), y las infecciones del tracto urinario (43,8 por ciento). La principal enfermedad cardiovascular fue la hipertensión arterial. Para los 5 fármacos seleccionados se reportó su esquema terapéutico (forma farmacéutica, dosis diaria, intervalo de dosis y duración del tratamiento). Conclusiones: Aunque en todos los casos el motivo de indicación es el adecuado, los fármacos pueden sustituirse por otros de menor riesgo cardiovascular. En su mayoría, los esquemas terapéuticos son correctos, salvo en los casos de la domperidona (duración prolongada) y el diclofenaco (altas dosis)(AU)

Introduction: The use of drugs with cardiotoxic potential to treat coexisting noncardiovascular diseases results in avoidable aggravation. Objective: To assess the prescription of 5 cardiotoxic drugs in patients with cardiovascular disease. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study (framed in the studies of drug utilization) was carried out from March to December 2020 in the Policlínico Santa Cruz (Artemisa, Cuba), in a population of 234 subjects with cardiovascular diseases who had been treated with domperidone, azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, ibuprofen and diclofenac. The variables studied were: sex, age, consumption of cardiotoxic drugs, reason for indication, cardiovascular disease, pharmaceutical form, daily dose, dose interval, and duration of treatment. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Results: The most prescribed drugs were azithromycin (n= 63), ibuprofen (n= 59) and ciprofloxacin (n= 57). Their main reasons for indication were, respectively, community-acquired pneumonia (38.1 percent), skin and soft tissue infections (28.8 percent), and urinary tract infections (43.8 percent). The main cardiovascular disease was arterial hypertension. For the 5 selected drugs, their therapeutic scheme (pharmaceutical form, daily dose, dose interval and duration of treatment) was reported. Conclusions: Although in all cases the reason for indication was adequate, the drugs can be substituted by others of lower cardiovascular risk. For the most part, the therapeutic regimens are correct, except in the cases of domperidone (prolonged duration) and diclofenac (high doses)(AU)

Quality of prescription writing in Brazilian primary health care.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of prescription writing in the context of public primary health care. BACKGROUND: Prescription errors are one of the leading patient safety problems in primary care and can be caused by errors in therapeutic decisions or in the quality of prescription writing. METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study conducted in a municipality in Northeastern Brazil. The assessment instrument (including 13 indicators and one composite indicator) was applied to a representative sample of drug prescriptions from the 24 Family Health Teams providing Primary Health Care in the municipality, dispensed in January 2021. Estimates of compliance and their 95% confidence intervals and graphical analysis of frequencies are assessed globally and stratified by dispensing units and prescribers. FINDINGS: The average composite prescription writing quality on a 0-100 scale was 60.2 (95% CI 57.8-62.6). No quality criteria had 100% compliance. The highest compliance rates were found for 'frequency of administration' (98.9%) and 'identification of the prescriber' (98.9%). On the other hand, 'recorded information on allergy' (0.0%), 'patient's date of birth' (1.7%), 'nonpharmacological recommendations' (1.7%), and 'guidance on the use of the drug' (25%) were the indicators with lower compliance, contributing to 69% of the noncompliances found. The type and frequency of the errors in the quality of prescription writing uncovered in this study confirm the continuing need to tackle this problem to improve patient safety. The results identify priority aspects for interventions and further studies on the quality of prescription writing in the context of Primary Health Care in Brazil.

Association between self-reported evidence-based medicine competencies and prescribing of drugs without scientific evidence against mild COVID-19 among recently graduated physicians in Peru.

Objective: To evaluate the association between self-rated evidence-based medicine (EBM) competencies and the prescription of drugs without scientific evidence against mild COVID-19 (present with any of the signs and symptoms of COVID-19 but who do not have shortness of breath, dyspnea, or abnormal chest imaging) among recently graduated physicians in Peru. Methods: We conducted an analytical cross-sectional study where we evaluated a non-probability sample of recently graduated physicians during June and July 2021 (end of second wave of COVID-19 in Peru). Self-rated EBM competencies were assessed by four domains (formulation of a clinical question, search, analysis, and application) using a Likert scale with scores from zero to four ("Very inadequate" = 0, to "Very Adequate" = 4), it was considered as "Adequate" if the score was three or four. In addition, the variable "General competence on EBM" was rated as "Adequate" if in all domains evaluated it presented an adequate self-rating. For the outcome, drug prescription, we considered the use of ivermectin, azithromycin, other antibiotics, hydroxychloroquine, dexamethasone, and anticoagulants (drugs with no efficacy demonstrated for patients with mild COVID-19). To assess the association, we used Poisson regression models with robust variances and obtaining crude (cPR) and adjusted (aPR) prevalence ratios with their 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Results: Of a total of 239 physicians included 70.7% prescribed at least one drug without scientific evidence. A total of 51.1% reported adequate ratings in all evaluated domains of EBM. Self-rating the "Clinical Question Formulation" competency as adequate was associated with a lower frequency of prescribing medications for mild COVID-19 (aPR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.91-0.95). While self-rating as adequate the competency of "Identify possible implications of investigations" was associated with an increase in the prescription of such drugs (aPR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.09-1.20). Additionally, self-rating all domains as adequate were associated with less prescription (aPR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.90-0.96). Conclusion: Seven out of ten recently graduated physicians prescribed some type of medication without scientific evidence to treat patients with mild COVID-19. Having adequate self-perceived EBM competencies was associated with a lower frequency of prescribing medications without scientific evidence to manage patients with mild COVID-19.

Avaliação de prescrições médicas de medicamentos em uma emergência hospitalar / Evaluation of drug prescriptions in a hospital emergency department / Evaluación de la prescripción de medicamentos en un servicio de urgencias hospitalario

RESUMO Objetivo: avaliar a adesão das prescrições médicas de medicamentos às recomendações para segurança do paciente por meio do checklist - Lista de Verificação de Segurança na Prescrição de Medicamentos. Método: trata-se de um estudo observacional, transversal, realizado entre maio a junho de 2022, com 341 prescrições médicas de medicamentos, numa emergência hospitalar no interior da Bahia - Brasil, cujos dados foram analisados através de análise descritiva. Resultados: 80% a 89% das prescrições tiveram adesão às recomendações de segurança; o item de maior adesão foi identificação da data da prescrição, menor adesão foi possuir medicamentos com nomes semelhantes identificados com caixa alta ou negrito. Cerca de 18,63% (n=514) dos medicamentos prescritos fazem parte da lista de medicamentos potencialmente perigosos de uso hospitalar. Conclusão: a avaliação das prescrições médicas de medicamentos evidenciou barreiras existentes na prática clínica, o que possibilita a elaboração de mecanismos mais efetivos para promoção da segurança do paciente.

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the adherence of medical prescriptions to patient safety recommendations using the Medication Prescription Safety Checklist. Method: This is an observational, cross-sectional study carried out between May and June 2022, with 341 medical prescriptions for medicines in a hospital emergency room in the interior of Bahia - Brazil, whose data were analyzed through descriptive analysis. Results: 80% to 89% of the prescriptions adhered to the safety recommendations; the item with the highest adherence was identification of the date of the prescription, and the lowest adherence was having drugs with similar names identified in upper case or bold. Around 18.63% (n=514) of the drugs prescribed are on the list of potentially dangerous drugs for hospital use. Conclusion: The evaluation of medical prescriptions for medicines highlighted existing barriers in clinical practice, which makes it possible to develop more effective mechanisms to promote patient safety.

RESUMEN Objetivo: Evaluar la adhesión de las prescripciones médicas a las recomendaciones de seguridad del paciente utilizando la checklist - Lista de verificación de la Seguridad de la Prescripción de Medicamentos. Método: Se trata de un estudio observacional, transversal, realizado entre mayo y junio de 2022, con 341 prescripciones médicas de medicamentos, en la sala de urgencias de un hospital del interior de Bahia - Brasil, cuyos datos fueron analizados mediante análisis descriptivo. Resultados: Entre el 80% y el 89% de las prescripciones cumplieron las recomendaciones de seguridad; el punto con mayor cumplimiento fue la identificación de la fecha de la prescripción, y el de menor cumplimiento, que los medicamentos con nombres similares se identificaran en mayúsculas o en negrita. Alrededor del 18,63% (n=514) de los medicamentos prescriptos figuran en la lista de medicamentos potencialmente peligrosos de uso hospitalario. Conclusiones: La evaluación de las prescripciones médicas de medicamentos puso de manifiesto los obstáculos existentes en la práctica clínica, lo que permite desarrollar mecanismos más eficaces para promover la seguridad de los pacientes.

Prescription of transdermal patches in Colombia: A real-world evidence study.

BACKGROUND: Transdermal drug delivery has contributed positively to medical practice. However, prescriptions that do not meet minimum quality criteria and medication errors are common. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine how transdermal patches are being prescribed to a group of patients in Colombia, the compliance with established requirements of such prescriptions and the comparisons between correct and incorrect prescriptions. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of prescriptions for transdermal patches using data from a population-based drug dispensing database between December 1 and 31, 2019. Medical prescriptions were randomly reviewed, establishing whether the drugs were appropriately prescribed by the manufacturer's indications or national regulations. Descriptive and bivariate analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 415 prescriptions were reviewed; the prescription was provided to 412 patients with a median age of 76.9 years, and 63.3% were women. Rivastigmine was the most prescribed transdermal patch (57.8%). 66.3% of all prescriptions did not meet the minimum appropriate prescribing standards, especially those for rivastigmine (97.1%). The 7.0% of all prescriptions had posology errors, especially prescriptions for buprenorphine (43.8%). Older patients (84.4% vs 52.5%), from the Pacific region (34.4% vs 23.7%), with manual formulations (22.1% vs 0.8%), dementia (49.0% vs 6.8%), and in management with lipid-lowering drugs (41.8% vs 30.5%), presented incorrect transdermal patch formulations more frequently (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The high proportion of inappropriately prescribed transdermal patches should draw the attention of those responsible for health care to improve the training of physicians and create prescription quality verification systems.

Antibiotic Prescription in Endodontics: A Transversal Observational Study Comparing Dental Students and General Dental Practitioners in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate and compare antibiotic prescriptions for endodontic infections of last-year undergraduate Dentistry students and dental surgeons from Brazil. Material and Methods: A questionnaire comprised of 15 questions was applied, including a series of hypothetical clinical cases through multiple choice questions. The survey respondents had the option to respond in favor or against the prescription of antimicrobials in each case. Afterwards, the commented answer keys of all topics contained in the survey form were released for educational purpose. Results: A total of 42 undergraduates and 115 dental surgeons answered the survey. Regarding the questions about antimicrobial prescriptions, 91.3% of the professional dentists and 69.8% of the dentistry students indicated that they prescribe antibiotics for a limited number of patients. However, when they responded about drug recommendations, most professionals (76.5%) and students (76.7%) chose to recommend antimicrobials without any clinical recommendation. Conclusion: In the groups herein evaluated, many antibiotic prescriptions could have been avoided. The rational use of these drugs is still a conduct that needs further disclosure and commitment among prescribers.

Análise das solicitações de medicamentos não padronizados de um hospital universitário terciário / Analysis of requests for non-standard medicines from a tertiary university hospital

Introdução: O uso extensivo de medicamentos não padronizados causa aumento de custos em saúde, além de potencial redução de segurança e uso racional de medicamentos. A Comissão de Farmácia e Terapêutica orienta a prescrição de medicamentos, por meio da avaliação e seleção de medicamentos a serem incluídos no formulário de medicamentos padronizados, com base nas melhores evidências científicas disponíveis e no perfil dos pacientes locais, promovendo o uso racional de medicamentos. O objetivo deste trabalho foi analisar as solicitações de fornecimento de medicamentos não padronizados na instituição. Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo observacional e descritivo onde foram analisadas as solicitações de medicamentos não padronizados realizadas entre fevereiro de 2016 e dezembro de 2021, identificando os medicamentos envolvidos e seus respectivos custos. Resultados: Foram realizadas 203 solicitações no período, sendo 174 incluídas no estudo. Os medicamentos que tiveram mais solicitações foram o rituximabe (41), a imunoglobulina humana (31), o sucralfato (23), a nitazoxanida (12) e o eltrombopague (7). As solicitações com maior custo foram as de imunoglobulina humana (US$ 799,702.38), rituximabe (US$ 717,320.26), eltrombopague (US$ 281,062.50), ruxolitinibe (US$ 167,867.46) e bortezomibe (US$ 149,033.52). As principais clínicas que solicitaram medicamentos não padronizado foram a neurologia (47), a hematologia (30), as moléstias infecciosas e parasitárias (17), e a anestesiologia (12). As solicitações de maior custo foram realizadas pela neurologia (US$ 145,519.08), hematologia (US$ 120,980.25), transplante de medula óssea (US$ 51,635.11) e dermatologia (US$ 44,813.40). Conclusão: O estudo demonstrou que há um fluxo estruturado de solicitação de medicamentos não padronizados na instituição, sendo uma importante ferramenta de gerenciamento dessas solicitações, evitando a aquisição desnecessária de itens que não compõem o elenco terapêutico do hospital.

Introduction: Widespread use of non-formulary drugs (NFD) increases cost and may reduce safety and rational use of medicines. The Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee provides guidance on drug prescription by evaluating and selecting medications to be included in a hospital's formulary based on best scientific evidence available and local patients' profile, promoting rational use of medicines. The objective of this study was to assess non-formulary drugs prescriptions at a tertiary hospital. Methods: This was a retrospective study. NFD prescribed and its associated costs were assessed through NFD request forms received from February 2016 to December 2021. Results: A total of 203 NFD request forms were received, from which 174 were included in this study. The most frequently prescribed NFD included rituximab (n = 41), immunoglobulin (31), sucralfate (23), nitazoxanide (12), and eltrombopag (7), with the highest costs being with immunoglobulin (US$ 799,702.38), rituximab (US$ 717,320.26), eltrombopag (US$ 281,062.50), ruxolitinib (US$ 167,867.46), and bortezomib (US$ 149,033.52). The most frequent requesting specialties were neurology (n = 47), hematology (30), infectious disease (17) and anesthesiology (12), and highest costs requests were from neurology (US$ 145,519.08), hematology (US$ 120,980.25), bone marrow transplant unit (US$ 51,635.11), and dermatology (US$ 44,813.40). Conclusion: This study showed that a structured request flow for NFD prescription is a critical procedure in order to better manage drug prescription within the hospital, promoting rational use of medicines and preventing unnecessary spending with drugs for which the clinical indication may be covered by a drug already in the hospital's formulary.

Alta médica a pedido: o que fazer, doutor? / Discharge against medical advice: what to do, doctor? / Alta médica a pedido: ¿qué hacer, doctor?

Resumo Este artigo aborda as condutas preconizadas pelos conselhos de medicina do Brasil relacionadas à "alta médica a pedido". Trata-se de uma pesquisa documental e exploratória, que buscou identificar e analisar diversas manifestações dos conselhos acerca de questionamentos e dúvidas suscitadas pelos médicos quando se deparavam com pedidos de alta médica. Para tanto, utilizou-se o método de análise hipotético-dedutivo. A partir da problemática apresentada (insegurança ético-jurídica dos médicos no deferimento dos pedidos de alta), levantaram-se as soluções propostas às questões atinentes ao tema destinadas aos conselhos de medicina. Elas foram analisadas criticamente à luz do ordenamento ético-jurídico, com vistas a proporcionar ao médico maior segurança e tranquilidade na condução desse procedimento.

Abstract This paper examines the procedures recommended by Brazilian medical councils regarding "discharge against medical advice". An exploratory and documentary research was conducted to identify and analyze several council publications regarding questions and doubts raised by physicians when faced with discharge requests. Solutions proposed to the issue at hand (ethical-legal insecurity of physicians in authorizing discharges) were analyzed based on ethical-legal frameworks, aiming to provide physicians with greater security and tranquility in conducting this procedure.

Resumen Este artículo discute la conducta recomendada por los consejos de medicina de Brasil respecto al "alta médica por solicitud". Se trata de una investigación documental y exploratoria, que pretendió identificar y analizar diversas manifestaciones de los consejos sobre los interrogantes y dudas planteadas por los médicos ante las solicitudes de alta médica. Para ello, se utilizó el método de análisis hipotético-deductivo. Con base en el problema presentado (inseguridad ético-jurídica de los médicos en la concesión de solicitudes de alta), se plantearon propuestas de solución a cuestiones relacionadas con el tema dirigidas a los consejos de medicina. Se utilizó la perspectiva ética-jurídica, con el objetivo de brindar mayor seguridad y tranquilidad al médico en la realización de este procedimiento.

Perfil prescriptivo de corticoides en el servicio de urgencias del Hospital Odontológico de la ciudad de Formosa, Argentina / Prescriptive Profile of Corticoids in the Emergency Department of the Dental Hospital of the City of Formosa, Argentina

Objetivo: identificar el perfil prescriptivo de corticoides en pacientes que asistieron al Servicio de Urgencias del Hospital Odontológico de la ciudad de Formosa, Argentina. Métodos: se realizó un estudio transversal, observacional y descriptivo, se analizaron las prescripciones de corticoides realizadas por odontólogos que atendieron en el Servicio de Urgencias del Hospital Odontológico de la ciudad de Formosa desde marzo 2019 a febrero 2020. Las variables de estudio fueron: características demográficas del paciente, diagnóstico clínico odontológico, corticoide prescrito, dosis y forma farmacéutica. Resultados: de un total de 9.635 historias clínicas, se observaron 3.244 prescripciones de corticoides (33,6%). De acuerdo a los corticoides prescritos, se halló a la dexametasona para vía intramuscular y además se utilizó dexametasona en tratamientos combinados con dipirona para vía intramuscular e ibuprofeno para vía oral. Los diagnósticos relacionados con prescripción de estos medicamentos fueron: pulpitis, periodontitis apical aguda, flemón/absceso, entre otras. De acuerdo al valor intrínseco terapéutico potencial, los fármacos prescritos en el hospital odontológico son de valor elevado, esto significa que demostraron eficacia para el tratamiento, el diagnóstico o la prevención de enfermedades del ser humano. Conclusiones: el estudio de la utilización de medicamentos en el Hospital Odontológico de la ciudad de Formosa permitió observar situaciones donde los corticoides no están indicados. Además, se señala la prescripción excesiva de la vía intramuscular. A partir de los resultados obtenidos es necesario realizar una retroalimentación a los prescriptores, por lo que se sugieren intervenciones para elaborar propuestas de solución a los problemas identificados y formular políticas de medicamentos.

Objective: to identify the prescriptive profile of corticosteroids in patients who were treated at the Emergency Service of the Dental Hospital of the City of Formosa, Argentina. Methods: a cross-sectional, observational, and descriptive study was carried out, and corticosteroid prescriptions made by dentists who attended the Emergency Service of the Dental Hospital of the City of Formosa, from March 2019 to February 2020 were analyzed. The study variables were: demographic characteristics of the patient, dental clinical diagnosis, corticosteroid prescribed, dose, and pharmaceutical form. Results: Of 9,635 medical records, 3,244 corticosteroid prescriptions (33.6%) were observed. According to the prescribed corticosteroids, dexamethasone was found for the intramuscular route, and dexamethasone was also used in combined treatments with dipyrone for the intramuscular route and ibuprofen for the oral route. The diagnoses related to the prescription of these medications were: pulpitis, acute apical periodontitis, phlegmon/abscess, trauma, pericoronitis, hypersensitivity and alveolitis. According to the potential therapeutic intrinsic value, the drugs prescribed in the dental hospital are of high value, which means that they have demonstrated efficacy for the treatment, diagnosis or prevention of diseases that affect humans. Conclusions: the study of the use of drugs in the Dental Hospital of the City of Formosa allowed us to observe situations where corticosteroids are not indicated. In addition, the excessive prescription of the intramuscular route is pointed out. Based on the results obtained, it is necessary to provide feedback to the prescribers, so it is suggested to continue with different interventions to develop proposals for solutions to the identified problems and formulate drug policies.

Análise das intervenções farmacêuticas clínicas em Unidade de Terapia Intensiva de um hospital de urgência e trauma / Analysis of clinical pharmaceutical interventions in the Intensive Care Unit of an emergency and trauma hospital

Analisar o perfil das intervenções farmacêuticas providas pelos farmacêuticos clínicos por meio da análise de prescrições médicas em uma Unidade de Terapia Intensiva (UTI) adulto generalista. Metodologia: Trata-se de um estudo transversal, prospectivo e observacional, com abordagem quantitativa, realizado na UTI de um hospital público referência em urgência e trauma do estado de Goiás. Os dados foram coletados no período de junho a agosto do ano de 2022, por meio da análise diária das prescrições. Resultados: A população estudada compreendeu 74 pacientes, em sua maioria do sexo masculino (68,92%), hipertensos (27,03%), e diabéticos (14,86%). Foram analisadas 568 prescrições, e identificados 489 problemas relacionados a medicamentos, sendo os mais prevalentes: medicamento inapropriado/desnecessário ou contraindicado (30,67%) e necessidade de medicamento adicional (24,34%). As classes de medicamentos mais envolvidas nos problemas foram: anti-infecciosos gerais para uso sistêmico (23,72%), e agentes do sistema nervoso (23,11%). Das intervenções farmacêuticas promovidas, 84,25% foram aceitas, com maior frequência: suspender medicamento (30,67%) e iniciar terapia medicamentosa (23,72%). Conclusão: Diante dos resultados apresentados, nota-se a boa taxa de aceitabilidade das intervenções, destacando a importância da atuação do farmacêutico clínico dentro da UTI na prevenção de problemas relacionados à farmacoterapia, bem como na melhoria dos desfechos terapêuticos

To analyze the profile of pharmaceutical interventions provided by clinical pharmacists through the analysis of medical prescriptions in a generalist adult Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Methodology: This is a cross-sectional, prospective and observational study, with a quantitative approach, conducted in the ICU of a public hospital that is a reference in emergency and trauma in the state of Goiás. Data were collected from June to August of 2022, through the daily analysis of prescriptions. Results: The population being studied comprised 74 patients, mostly male (68.92%), hypertensive (27.03%), and diabetic (14.86%). 568 prescriptions were analyzed, and 489 problems related to medication were identified, the most prevalent being: inappropriate/unnecessary or contraindicated medication (30.67%) and need for additional medication (24.34%). The drug classes most involved in the problems were: general anti-infectives for systemic use (23.72%) and nervous system agents (23.11%). Of the promoted pharmaceutical interventions, 84.25% were accepted, most frequently: discontinuing medication (30.67%) and starting medication therapy (23.72%). Conclusion: In view of the results presented, there is a good rate of acceptability of the interventions, highlighting the importance of the role of the clinical pharmacist within the ICU in preventing problems related to pharmacotherapy, as well as in improving therapeutic outcomes

Study of Prescription-Indication of Outpatient Systemic Anti-Fungals in a Colombian Population. A Cross-Sectional Study.

The inappropriate use of antifungals is associated with greater antimicrobial resistance, costs, adverse events, and worse clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine prescription patterns and approved and unapproved indications for systemic antifungals in a group of patients in Colombia. This was a cross-sectional study on indications for the use of systemic antifungals in outpatients from a drug dispensing database of approximately 9.2 million people affiliated with the Colombian Health System. Sociodemographic, pharmacological, and clinical variables were considered. Descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate analyses were performed. A total of 74,603 patients with antifungal prescriptions were identified; they had a median age of 36.0 years (interquartile range: 22.0−53.0 years), and 67.3% of patients were women. Fluconazole (66.5%) was the most prescribed antifungal for indications such as vaginitis, vulvitis, and vulvovaginitis (35.0%). A total of 29.3% of the prescriptions were used in unapproved indications. A total of 96.3% of ketoconazole users used the medication in unapproved indications. Men (OR: 1.91; CI95%: 1.79−2.04), <18 years of age (OR: 1.20; CI95%: 1.11−1.31), from the Caribbean region (OR: 1.26; CI95%: 1.18−1.34), with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR: 1.80; CI95%: 1.27−2.54), prescriptions made by a general practitioner (OR: 1.17; CI95%: 1.04−1.31), receiving comedications (OR: 1.58; CI95%: 1.48−1.69), and the concomitant use of other antimicrobials (OR: 1.77; CI95%: 1.66−1.88) were associated with a higher probability that the antifungal was used for unapproved indications; deep mycosis (OR: 0.49; CI95%: 0.41−0.58), prescribing fluconazole (OR: 0.06; CI95%: 0.06−0.06), and having diabetes mellitus (OR: 0.33; CI95%: 0.29−0.37), cancer (OR: 0.13; CI95%: 0.11−0.16), or HIV (OR: 0.07; CI95%: 0.04−0.09) reduced this risk. Systemic antifungals were mostly used for the management of superficial mycoses, especially at the gynecological level. In addition, more than a quarter of patients received these medications in unapproved indications, and there was broad inappropriate use of ketoconazole.