Nickel release from 316L stainless steel following a Ni-free electroplating cycle.

Electroplating can induce nickel release even from 316L stainless steel, typically considered safe. In this work, the influence of different electroplating processes and surface treatments on nickel release was evaluated. The nickel release was tested according to the EN 1811 standard. The impact of surface roughness on nickel release was assessed by comparing polished and unpolished samples. Results indicate that internal stresses can worsen nickel release, while increasing the thickness of the precious metal layer is beneficial. To corroborate our hypothesis, it was verified that coatings obtained through physical vapor deposition (PVD), without removing the passivation layer of the steel, did not release nickel. For these reasons, we identified the main cause of nickel release as the combined effect of the removal of the passivation layer of stainless steel and the microporosity of the electroplating process.

The ability of sweat and buffer solutions to reduce hexavalent chromium of relevance for leather extraction.

The European Union restricted the amount of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) in leather in 2015, but skin allergy cases due to Cr-tanned leather are not declining. Standardized extraction methods have been criticized to both over- and underestimate the expected amount of bioavailable Cr(VI) in leather. This study aims to evaluate the ability of four extraction solutions to reduce or preserve Cr(VI): artificial sweat solutions (ASWs) of pH 4.7, 6.5, and 8.0, and phosphate buffer (PB) of pH 8.0. This was investigated by incubating each solution with added Cr(VI) as a function of time, and then measuring the recovered Cr(VI). All solutions, especially PB, preserved Cr(VI) for 24 h. These solutions were also pre-exposed to Cr-free vegetable-tanned leather (VTL) before incubation with Cr(VI). Released vegetable tannin species strongly reduced Cr(VI), with up to 4000 µg/L added Cr(VI) reduced in all solutions after 24 h. However, after 1 h, Cr(VI) was still detectable in extraction solutions at pH 6.5 and above. The reduction of Cr(VI) in relevant extraction solutions is hence a process dependent on time, pH, and the presence of co-released leather species. All extraction solutions, but least PB, have the potential to underestimate any Cr(VI) present on the surface of leather.

Nickel release from metal items in contact with skin: a comparison of methods and practical implications for regulation in Europe.

Contact allergy to Nickel is the most prevalent contact allergy in western societies. This has led to regulation for metallic items that come into prolonged and direct contact with the skin, such as buttons on clothing, belt buckles, jewelry and watches. In Europe, the legal provision is based on a test in which there is a limit to the amount of nickel that may be released from the item to an artificial sweat solution (EN 1811). This test is costly and has reproducibility issues. The resulting undertesting of items placed on the market, leads to many nickel releasing non-compliant articles being available in spite of the regulations that are in place. In this study, the performance of the standard release test is compared to the performance of a rapid nickel spot test based on dimethylglyoxime (DMG-test). The data suggest that using the rapid DMG-test for compliance testing is sufficiently equivalent to the current gold standard of EN 1811. Previously published comparisons between the DMG-test and EN 1811 did not consider the effect of accelerated wear and corrosion testing according to EN 12472. This study shows that by applying EN 12472, the number of deviating results between the DMG-test and EN 1811 decreases significantly. Regarding consumer protection, it is necessary for wear and corrosion resistance to be considered.

Nickel release from metallic earrings: A survey of the Danish market and validation of the nickel spot test.

BACKGROUND: Exposure to nickel-releasing ear-piercing jewellery may explain the persistently high prevalence of nickel allergy in Europe. While nickel release from earrings is regulated, field studies show that the regulation is not always respected. More knowledge is needed regarding the risk of piercing exposure including suitable screening methods. OBJECTIVE: To examine the proportion of earrings on the Danish market that release more nickel than allowed, and to validate the use of the dimethylglyoxime (DMG) test as a screening tool. METHODS: A total of 304 earrings were purchased and tested with the DMG test and X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. The level of nickel release was quantified in a selected subsample of 100 earrings by the European reference test EN 1811. The DMG spot test was validated against EN 1811 at different thresholds. RESULTS: Excessive nickel release according to the European regulation was found in 45 (14.8%) tested earrings. The sensitivity of the DMG test decreased with reduced levels of nickel release (sensitivity of 45.2% at ≥0.2 µg/cm2 /week vs 61.1% at >0.5 µg/cm2 /week). CONCLUSION: Excessive nickel release is common in earrings on the Danish market. Because of low sensitivity, the DMG test has limited use in screening of earrings for research but may still be used clinically.

Bioaccessibility of nickel and cobalt in powders and massive forms of stainless steel, nickel- or cobalt-based alloys, and nickel and cobalt metals in artificial sweat.

Nickel (Ni) and cobalt (Co) are the most common metal allergens upon skin contact at occupational settings and during consumer handling of metals and alloys. A standardized test (EN, 1811) exists to assess Ni release from articles of metals and alloys in massive forms intended for direct and prolonged skin contact, but no corresponding test exists for other materials such as powders or massive forms of alloys placed on the market or to determine the release of Co, for which only limited data is available. Differences in Ni and Co release from massive forms of a range of common stainless steels and some high-alloyed grades compared to Ni and Co metals were therefore assessed in artificial sweat for 1 week at 30 °C according to EN 1811. A comparable modified test procedure was elaborated and used for powders and some selected massive alloys. All alloys investigated released significantly less amount of Ni (100-5000-fold) and Co (200-400,000-fold) compared with Ni and Co metal, respectively. Almost all alloys showed a lower bioaccessible concentration (0.007-6.8 wt% Ni and 0.00003-0.6 wt% Co) when compared to corresponding bulk alloy contents (0.1-53 wt% Ni, 0.02-65 wt% Co). Observed differences are, among other factors, related to differences in bulk composition and to surface oxide characteristics. For the powders, less Ni and Co were released per surface area, but more per mass, compared to the corresponding massive forms.