Manejo del pseudoaneurisma esplénico y/o hepáticodespués de un traumatismo abdominal en pediatría / Management of splenic and/or hepatic pseudoaneurysm following abdominal trauma in pediatric patients

Introducción: Los pseudoaneurismas (PA) esplénicos y hepáticos son lesiones arteriovenosas raras que se pueden desarrollar tras un tramatismo abdominal. La rotura tardía es su complicación más frecuente que puede conducir a inestabilidad hemodinámica. El objetivo del presente es presentar nuestra experiencia en el manejo de los PA viscerales.Metodología: Estudio retrospectivo en pacientes < 15 años con traumatismo abdominal cerrado con lesión esplénica y/o hepática, entre 2012-2020. Se analizó el desarrollo de PA y el manejo realizado. En todos los pacientes se realizó tomografía computarizada estableciendo el grado del traumatismo, y estudio control en la primera semana postratumatismo mediante ecografía con contraste (CEUS). Si se confirmabaun PA se procedió a angiograma ± embolización percutánea.Resultados: Un total de 32 pacientes con traumatismo cerrado, edad media 8,7 ± 3,2 años (2-15 años), 68,7% (n = 22) hombres y mediana de grado de traumatismo grado III (grado II-IV), 33,3% (n =5/15) desarrollaron un PA esplénico y 5,8% (n = 1/17) desarrollaron un PA hepático con tiempo diagnóstico medio de 3,7 ± 3 (3-8) días. El desarrollo de PA se asoció a mayor puntuación en el índice de severidad con una diferencia de medias de 15,6 ± 5,3 (CI 95% 4,37:26,14 p < 0,008). Todos los PA se trataron mediante embolización un 85,7% (n = 5/6) excepto una esplenectomía urgente.Conclusiones: Los PA viscerales están infradiagnosticados, con una incidencia mayor a la reportada. Consideramos que un estudio de imagen (CEUS) debe ser realizado previo al alta en los traumatismos severos. El tratamiento sigue siendo controversial: sin embargo, recomendamos la embolización percutánea reservando la esplenectomíapara paciente inestables.

Introduction: Splenic and hepatic seudoaneurysm (PA) is a rare arteriovenous injury that may occur following abdominal trauma. The most frequent complication of PA is late rupture, which can lead to hemodynamic instability. The objective of this study was to describe our experience in the management of visceral PA.Materials and methods: A retrospective study of patients under15 years of age with blunt abdominal trauma associated with splenicand/or hepatic injury treated from 2012 to 2020 was carried out. PAformation and management were analyzed. All patients underwent CT-scan, which allowed trauma grade to be established, and also controlcontrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in the first week followingtrauma. If PA was confirmed, angiography ± percutaneous embolizationwere performed.Results: A total of 32 patients with blunt trauma were included.Mean age was 8.7 ± 3.2 years (2-15 years). 68.7% (n = 22) of patientswere male. Median trauma grade was grade III (grades II-IV). 33.3%(n = 5/15) of patients developed splenic PA, and 5.8% (n = 1/17) ofpatients developed hepatic PA, with mean diagnostic time being 3.7 ± 3(3-8) days. PA formation was associated with higher severity scores,with a mean difference of 15.6 ± 5.3 (95% CI: 4.37:26.14 p < 0.008). AllPA cases – except for one, which required urgent splenectomy – weretreated with embolization (85.7%) (n = 5/6).Conclusions: Visceral PA is underdiagnosed, with an incidencehigher than reported. Imaging studies (CEUS) are required prior todischarge in the presence of severe trauma. Treatment remains contro-versial, but we recommend percutaneous embolization, with splenectomybeing reserved for unstable patients.

[Usefulness of contrast enhanced ultrasound for evaluation of cystic renal masses.] / Utilidad de la ecografía con contraste en el estudio de las lesiones renales quísticas.

OBJECTIVE: Contrast enhanced ultrasound(CE) consists of the intravenous injection of gasmicrobubbles and their detection within the kidney in differentphases. CE is more accurate than contrast enhancedtomography for detection of septa and wall thicknessvascularization in cystic renal lesions. The purposes ofthis study are to confirm the usefulness of this tool in thecharacterization of complex cystic renal masses and toassess its histological correlation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective observationalstudy of 78 patients with complex or indeterminatecystic renal masses who underwent a CE betweenJanuary 2015 - January 2020. RESULTS: Lesions with high suspicion of malignancy(Bosniak III and IV) were identified in 35 patients(45%). A surgical approach was taken in 23 (30%): 18patients with histology of renal cell carcinoma, and onlyin 4 the histology was benign. CE involved a change intherapeutic management due to better definition of thelesion in 48 patients (61.5%). CE has a sensitivity 100%,specificity 91.5%, PPV 81.8%, NPV 100%, and CE hadan important confidence level showed by the area underthe ROC curve (AUC = 0.968). CONCLUSIONS: CE is a useful tool in the characterizationof complex cystic renal lesions. It allows abetter definition of the Bosniak classification for thoseindeterminate or doubtful cases on CT that couldgenerate a change in the therapeutic attitude in manycases. It has a good image - histology relation.

OBJETIVO: La ecografía con contraste(EC) consiste en la inyección intravenosa demicroburbujas de gas y su detección dentro del riñón endistintas fases. En las lesiones renales quísticas la EC esmás sensible que la tomografía con contraste para valorarla vascularización de septos y tabiques. Los objetivosde este trabajo son confirmar la utilidad de esta técnicaen la caracterización de las lesiones renales quísticascomplejas y estudiar su relación anatomo-patológica MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio observacionalretrospectivo de 78 pacientes con masas renales quísticascomplejas o dudosas en los que se les realizó una ECentre enero 2015 ­ enero 2020. RESULTADOS: En 35 pacientes (45%) se identificaronlesiones con alta sospecha de malignidad (BosniakIII y IV). En 23 (30%) se tomó una actitud quirúrgica: 18con anatomía patológica de carcinoma de células renalesy 4 con anatomía patológica benigna. En 48 pacientes(61,5%) supuso un cambio de actitud terapéuticadebido a la mejor definición de la lesión. La EC presentóuna sensibilidad 100%, especificidad 91,5%, VPP 81,8%,VPN 100%, con un nivel confianza diagnóstica mostradopor el área bajo la curva ROC (AUC = 0,968).CONCLUSIÓN: La EC es una herramienta útil en lavaloración de quistes renales complejos. Permite unamejor definición de la clasificación Bosniak para aquelloscasos indeterminados o dudosos en TC, que implicóun cambio de actitud terapéutica en muchos casos. Además,presenta una buena relación imagen-histología.

Utilidad de la ecografía con contraste en el estudio de las lesiones renales quísticas / Usefulness of contrast enhanced ultrasound for evaluation of cystic renal masses

OBJETIVO: La ecografía con contraste (EC) consiste en la inyección intravenosa demicroburbujas de gas y su detección dentro del riñón endistintas fases. En las lesiones renales quísticas la EC esmás sensible que la tomografía con contraste para valorar la vascularización de septos y tabiques. Los objetivosde este trabajo son confirmar la utilidad de esta técnicaen la caracterización de las lesiones renales quísticascomplejas y estudiar su relación anatomo-patológicaMATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio observacionalretrospectivo de 78 pacientes con masas renales quísticas complejas o dudosas en los que se les realizó una ECentre enero 2015 – enero 2020.RESULTADOS: En 35 pacientes (45%) se identificaron lesiones con alta sospecha de malignidad (BosniakIII y IV). En 23 (30%) se tomó una actitud quirúrgica: 18con anatomía patológica de carcinoma de células renales y 4 con anatomía patológica benigna. En 48 pacientes (61,5%) supuso un cambio de actitud terapéuticadebido a la mejor definición de la lesión. La EC presentóuna sensibilidad 100%, especificidad 91,5%, VPP 81,8%,VPN 100%, con un nivel confianza diagnóstica mostradopor el área bajo la curva ROC (AUC = 0,968).CONCLUSIÓN: La EC es una herramienta útil en lavaloración de quistes renales complejos. Permite unamejor definición de la clasificación Bosniak para aquellos casos indeterminados o dudosos en TC, que implicóun cambio de actitud terapéutica en muchos casos. Además, presenta una buena relación imagen-histología. (AU)

OBJECTIVE: Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CE) consists of the intravenous injection of gasmicrobubbles and their detection within the kidney in different phases. CE is more accurate than contrast enhanced tomography for detection of septa and wall thicknessvascularization in cystic renal lesions. The purposes ofthis study are to confirm the usefulness of this tool in thecharacterization of complex cystic renal masses and toassess its histological correlation.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study of 78 patients with complex or indeterminate cystic renal masses who underwent a CE betweenJanuary 2015 – January 2020.RESULTS: Lesions with high suspicion of malignancy (Bosniak III and IV) were identified in 35 patients(45%). A surgical approach was taken in 23 (30%): 18patients with histology of renal cell carcinoma, and onlyin 4 the histology was benign. CE involved a change intherapeutic management due to better definition of thelesion in 48 patients (61.5%). CE has a sensitivity 100%,specificity 91.5%, PPV 81.8%, NPV 100%, and CE hadan important confidence level showed by the area under the ROC curve (AUC = 0.968). CONCLUSIONS: CE is a useful tool in the characterization of complex cystic renal lesions. It allows abetter definition of the Bosniak classification for those indeterminate or doubtful cases on CT that couldgenerate a change in the therapeutic attitude in manycases. It has a good image – histology relation. (AU)

Evaluation of upper tract urothelial carcinomas by contrast-enhanced ultrasound. / Valoración del carcinoma urotelial de vías superiores mediante ecografía con contraste.

AIM: To describe the findings and behaviour of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the study of upper tract urothelial tumours and to assess its usefulness for diagnosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed our hospital's database over a period of 45 months to identify patients diagnosed with upper tract urothelial carcinomas. We reviewed the findings on mode B-ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (location and qualitative assessment of intensity and washout of enhancement), and made a comparison with other techniques (computed tomography or magnetic resonance), and with the surgical specimen. RESULTS: We found 42 patients with a diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma confirmed with surgery over the period reviewed. Twenty-eight (67%) patients underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Baseline ultrasound showed hydronephrosis with or without ureteral dilatation with echogenic content occupying the renal calyx (6), pelvis (10) or ureter (12). After injection of contrast, enhancement was noticed in 100% of the lesions, with similar intensity to the cortex in 23, and less in 5. Twenty-four lesions showed early washout, before the cortex, between 40 and 55seconds after the injection. The diagnosis was correct in 27 cases. Localisation coincided with the histological specimen in 28 cases, and 3 patients had additional distal carcinoma foci. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is a useful technique for diagnosing upper tract urothelial tumours that increases confidence in the diagnosis.

The radiologist's role in the management of papillary renal cell carcinoma. / Carcinoma papilar de células renales: el papel del radiólogo en su manejo.

Papillary carcinoma is the second most common renal cell carcinoma. It has a better prognosis than the more frequent clear cell carcinoma, although this does not hold true for advanced cases, because no specific treatment exists. It presents as a circumscribed peripheral tumor (small and homogeneously solid or larger and cystic/hemorrhagic) or as an infiltrating lesion that invades the veins, which has a worse prognosis. Due to their low vascular density, papillary renal cell carcinomas enhance less than other renal tumors, and this facilitates their characterization. On computed tomography, they might not enhance conclusively, and in these cases they are impossible to distinguish from hyperattenuating cysts. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging are more sensitive for detecting vascularization. Other characteristics include a specific vascular pattern, hypointensity on T2-weighted images, restricted water diffusion, and increased signal intensity in opposed phase images. We discuss the genetic, histologic, clinical, and radiological aspects of these tumors in which radiologists play a fundamental role in management.