Validity and reliability of the Persian version of modified motivated strategies for learning questionnaire: a methodological study among medical students.

BACKGROUND: Medical undergraduates need to improve their techniques for learning in the different settings of learning in clinical rotations. Reflective learning, in which a person can learn from their experiences, is among the most well-known learning skills. In this study, we aim to translate the newly developed modified form of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ) to Persian and evaluate its reliability and validity among medical students. METHODS: This study was performed on medical students in clinical stages at the Shiraz University of Medical Science in 2022. The modified MSLQ questionnaire was used in this study which is a 32-item tool measuring different aspects of self-reflecting, including self-orientation, feedback-seeking, critical thinking, and self-regulation. This questionnaire was translated into Persian properly. Cronbach's alpha and confirmatory factor analysis were used to ascertain the reliability and validity of the tool. RESULTS: A total of 325 medical students consisting of 174 men and 151 women with an average age of 23.79 (± 2.21) were enrolled. Path diagrams of confirmatory factor analysis for both standardized regression coefficients and t-values and all the fitness indicators were in favor of the proper validation of the translated version. The overall Cronbach's alpha for the questionnaire was 0.9, and the value for each of four subscales was above 0.7. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the Persian-translated version of the modified MSLQ is valid and reliable without taking too much time and effort to implement. We recommend that the developed tool be distributed to medical students from other Iran universities.

Acceptability and Effectiveness of a One-Hour Healthcare Provider Intervention Integrating HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis and Cultural Competence Training.

Enhanced provider training could improve PrEP access and equity. We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial comparing (a) a one-hour, group-based provider intervention integrating PrEP and Cultural Competence (PCC) training with (b) a standard HIV continuing medical education session (n = 56). PCC participants favorably rated the intervention and reported increased PrEP knowledge. The PCC intervention increased their confidence performing PrEP-related clinical activities and intention to prescribe PrEP. The percentage of participants discussing PrEP with patients increased marginally in both study conditions. The percentage of participants who prescribed PrEP and self-rated cultural competence did not change in either study condition.

RESUMEN: Una mejor capacitación de los proveedores podría mejorar el acceso y la equidad de la PrEP. Realizamos un ensayo controlado aleatorizado piloto que comparó (a) una intervención grupal de proveedores de una hora que integraba la capacitación en PrEP y competencia cultural (PCC) con (b) una sesión estándar de educación médica continua sobre el VIH (n = 56). Los participantes de PCC calificaron favorablemente la intervención e informaron un mayor conocimiento de la PrEP. La intervención de PCC aumentó su confianza en la realización de actividades clínicas relacionadas con la PrEP y su intención de prescribir la PrEP. El porcentaje de participantes que discutieron la PrEP con los pacientes aumentó marginalmente en ambas condiciones del estudio. El porcentaje de participantes que prescribieron la PrEP y la competencia cultural autoevaluada no cambió en ninguna de las condiciones del estudio.

Consensus Statement No. 434: Simulation in Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a comprehensive and current overview of the evidence for the value of simulation for education, team training, patient safety, and quality improvement in obstetrics and gynaecology, to familiarize readers with principles to consider in developing a simulation program, and to provide tools and references for simulation advocates. TARGET POPULATION: Providers working to improve health care for Canadian women and their families; patients and their families. OUTCOMES: Simulation has been validated in the literature as contributing to positive outcomes in achieving learning objectives, maintaining individual and team competence, and enhancing patient safety. Simulation is a well-developed modality with established principles to maximize its utility and create a safe environment for simulation participants. Simulation is most effective when it involves interprofessional collaboration, institutional support, and regular repetition. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: This modality improves teamwork skills, patient outcomes, and health care spending. Upholding prescribed principles of psychological safety when implementing a simulation program minimizes harm to participants. However, simulation can be an expensive tool requiring human resources, equipment, and time. EVIDENCE: Articles published between 2003 and 2022 were retrieved through searches of Medline and PubMed using the keywords "simulation" and "simulator." The search was limited to articles published in English and French. The articles were reviewed for their quality, relevance, and value by the SOGC Simulation Working Group. Expert opinion from relevant seminal books was also considered. VALIDATION METHODS: The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and conditional [weak] recommendations). INTENDED AUDIENCE: All health care professionals working to improve Canadian women's health, and relevant stakeholders, including granting agencies, physician/nursing/midwifery colleges, accreditation bodies, academic centres, hospitals, and training programs.

The effect of face-to-face versus online learning on student performance in anatomy: an observational study using a causal inference approach.

Introduction: This study aimed to estimate the causal effect of face-to-face learning on student performance in anatomy, compared to online learning, by analysing examination marks under a causal structure. Methods: We specified a causal graph to indicate how the mode of learning affected student performance. We sampled purposively to obtain end-semester examination marks of undergraduate and postgraduate students who learned using face-to-face (pre-COVID, 2019) or online modes (post-COVID, 2020). The analysis was informed by the causal graph. Marks were compared using linear regression, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess if effects were robust to unmeasured confounding. Results: On average, face-to-face learning improved student performance in the end-semester examination in undergraduate students (gain of mean 8.3%, 95% CI 3.3 to 13.4%; E-value 2.77, lower limit of 95% CI 1.80) but lowered performance in postgraduate students (loss of 8.1%, 95% CI 3.6 to 12.6%; E-value 2.89, lower limit of 95% CI 1.88), compared to online learning. Discussion: Under the assumed causal graph, we found that compared to online learning, face-to-face learning improved student performance in the end-semester examination in undergraduate students, but worsened student performance in postgraduate students. These findings suggest that different modes of learning may suit different types of students. Importantly, this is the first attempt to estimate causal effects of the mode of learning on student performance under a causal structure. This approach makes our assumptions transparent, informs data analysis, and is recommended when using observational data to make causal inferences.

Impact of malnutrition management e-learning module on GPs' knowledge: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is underdiagnosed in primary care. GPs are key healthcare contacts for older adults at risk of protein-energy malnutrition; however, lack of knowledge and confidence in its diagnosis and treatment is often reported. AIM: To evaluate the impact of a bespoke online education module on GP malnutrition knowledge and management. DESIGN & SETTING: A prospective pre-post pilot study with 23 GPs and eight GP trainees in the Republic of Ireland. METHOD: The module included units on the following: 'malnutrition definition, prevalence, and latest evidence'; 'identifying malnutrition in clinical practice'; 'food-first advice'; 'reviewing malnutrition'; and 'oral nutritional supplements'. Participant knowledge was measured using a multiple choice questionnaire (MCQ) before and after the module (n = 31), and 6 weeks following completion (n = 11). Case studies assessing identification and management of malnutrition were evaluated by a clinical specialist dietitian with expertise in managing malnutrition. Changes in assessment performance were calculated using paired t-tests. Acceptability was evaluated using a questionnaire. RESULTS: Post-training, 97% of GPs increased MCQ scores from baseline (+25%, P<0.001), with the greatest improvement in 'identifying malnutrition in clinical practice' (mean increase 47%, P<0.001). Eleven GPs completed the 6-week MCQ with scores remaining significantly higher than baseline (mean increase 15%, P = 0.005); 'identifying malnutrition in clinical practice' remained the most highly scored (mean increase 40%, P<0.001). Seventeen GPs completed the case studies; 76% at baseline and 88% post-module correctly calculated malnutrition risk scores. Appropriate malnutrition management improved for 47% of GPs after module completion. CONCLUSION: This e-learning module improved malnutrition knowledge, with good short-term retention in a small cohort. Development of online evidence-based nutrition education may improve GP nutrition care.

Lessons from the implementation of the Health Care Homes program.

Australia's primary health care system works well for most Australians, but 20% of people live with multimorbidity, often receiving fragmented care in a complex system. Australia's 10-year plan for primary health care recognises that person-centred care is essential to securing universal health coverage, improving health outcomes and achieving an integrated sustainable health system. The Health Care Homes trial tested a new model of person-centred care for people with chronic and complex health conditions. This model demonstrated that change can be achieved with dedicated transformational support and highlighted the importance of enablers and reform streams that are now established in the 10-year plan.

[Learning with digital media in emergency medicine-a path through the jungle of possibilities]. / Lernen mit digitalen Medien in der Notfallmedizin ­ ein Pfad durch den Dschungel der Möglichkeiten.

Background: Digital media, such as podcasts, wikis, ePortfolios, and extended reality applications, provide excellent learning opportunities with a high degree of connectivity and flexibility for learners, as well as for learning facilitators. This not only enables location-independent and pandemic-resilient learning, but also a high degree of autonomy for the learners. The megatrend of digitalization opens up many possibilities, but there are also stumbling blocks and limitations. Objectives: This article is intended to provide readers in the emergency medicine/rescue field with an overview, various aspects to consider, and awareness of stumbling blocks. However, a balancing act between didactics and medicine as well as the heterogeneous group of addressees is necessary. Methods: By means of a narrative review, an assessment of digital media is made and subjected to an evaluation from the perspective of educational practice. Conclusion: Learning is not only changing due to new learning technologies, but also due to the growing importance of informal learning, the increasing significance of the ability to quickly access high-quality knowledge, faster-changing professional biographies, and the use of digital universal tools. Thus, in the jungle of possibilities, an estimation of scientific quality criteria is often difficult and a differentiated consideration is necessary. Basically, the question of appropriate methods must be asked and it must be critically questioned whether the learning/competency objectives can be achieved with the planned digitalized media. Digital media cannot and should not replace practical training in the workplace.

Impact and Implications of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Urological Training.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 has forever impacted health care in the U.S. Changes to health and hospital policies led to disruptions to both patient care and medical training. There is limited understanding of the impact on urology resident training across the U.S. Our aim was to examine trends in urological procedures, as captured by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education resident case logs, throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Retrospective review of publicly available urology resident case logs between July 2015 and June 2021 was performed. Average case numbers were analyzed via linear regression with different models specifying different assumptions regarding the impact of COVID-19 on procedure in 2020 and onward. Statistical calculations utilized R (version 4.0.2). RESULTS: Analysis favored models which assumed the impact of COVID-related disruptions were specific to 2019-2020. Analysis of procedures performed indicate an average upward trend of urology cases nationally. An average annual increase of 26 procedures between 2016 and 2021 was noted, except for 2020 which saw an average drop of approximately 67 cases. However, in 2021 case volume dramatically increased to the same rate as projected had there not been a disruption in 2020. Stratifying by category of urology procedure revealed evidence for variability between categories in the magnitude of the 2020 decrease. CONCLUSIONS: Despite widespread pandemic-related disruptions in surgical care, urological volume has rebounded and increased, likely having minimal detriment to urological training over time. Urological care is essential and in high demand as evidenced by the uptick in volume across the U.S.

SWOT analysis and strategy suggestions on the application of remote teaching consultation in the continuing medical education for general practitioners / 中华全科医师杂志

Remote teaching consultation is an online continuing medical education mode which combines medical practice with teaching and superimposes teaching functions on the basis of remote consultation. Based on the pilot experiences of collaboration between Zhongshan Hospital and Xidu Community Health Service Center, this article analyzes the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT)of the remote teaching consultation for general practitioners, and discusses strategies to improve the further implementation plan. The analysis showed that as a novel educational method, the remote teaching consultation should take the advantages of online education, make good use of the remote consultation platform, improve its teaching connotation, and form standardized implementation norms to meet the diversified needs of general practitioners for continuing medical education.

Reforms in medical education: lessons learnt from Kyrgyzstan.

Human resources are one of the six building blocks of a health system. In order to ensure that these resources are adequately trained to meet the evolving needs of populations, medical education reforms are needed. In Kyrgyzstan, like in many other low- and middle-income countries, human resources for health are a key challenge for the health system in both the quantity and having their training aligned with the health system priorities. Here we present the experience of the Medical Education Reform Project, a project aimed at improving the quality of health professionals through reforming medical education, funded by the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, as a collaborative effort between partners in Kyrgyzstan and Switzerland since 2013. We used a qualitative study taking a cooperative inquiry approach with an experiential perspective in order to present the implementation of the Medical Education Reform Project in Kyrgyzstan. In order to look at the different components impacting the reform process, a framework comprising: Setting the direction; Building a consensus; Engaging stakeholders; Pilot projects and evaluation; Capacity building; Timing, and Key partners was used to disentangle the lessons learnt. Champions and partnering with key institutions were essential in building consensus, as was the catalytic and facilitating role the project played. This enabled active engagement of a variety of stakeholders in the reform process using different means of interaction ranging from large roundtable discussions, workshops, trainings and even study tours. Pilot projects and research provided tangible actions that could be used to further the reforms. For capacity building, the project offered a wide range of activities that improved clinical competencies, empowered stakeholders, and strengthened organizational capacity. The timing of this reform process in medical education was facilitated by the overall reforms and policies in the health system.

Barriers to identifying and obtaining CME: a national survey of physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants.

BACKGROUND: CPD educators and CME providers would benefit from further insight regarding barriers and supports in obtaining CME, including sources of information about CME. To address this gap, we sought to explore challenges that clinicians encounter as they seek CME, and time and monetary support allotted for CME. METHODS: In August 2018, we surveyed licensed US clinicians (physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants), sampling 100 respondents each of family medicine physicians, internal medicine and hospitalist physicians, medicine specialist physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants (1895 invited, 500 [26.3%] responded). The Internet-based questionnaire addressed barriers to obtaining CME, sources of CME information, and time and monetary support for CME. RESULTS: The most often-selected barriers were expense (338/500 [68%]) and travel time (N = 286 [57%]). The source of information about CME activities most commonly selected was online search (N = 348 [70%]). Direct email, professional associations, direct mail, and journals were also each selected by > 50% of respondents. Most respondents reported receiving 1-6 days (N = 301 [60%]) and $1000-$5000 (n = 263 [53%]) per year to use in CME activities. Most (> 70%) also reported no change in time or monetary support over the past 24 months. We found few significant differences in responses across clinician type or age group. In open-ended responses, respondents suggested eight ways to enhance CME: optimize location, reduce cost, publicize effectively, offer more courses and content, allow flexibility, ensure accessibility, make content clinically relevant, and encourage application. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians report that expense and travel time are the biggest barriers to CME. Time and money support is limited, and not increasing. Online search and email are the most frequently-used sources of information about CME. Those who organize and market CME should explore options that reduce barriers of time and money, and creatively use online tools to publicize new offerings.