Does sacroiliitis is a mandatory criterion for enthesitis-related arthritis diagnosis?

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sensitivity and specificity seem to be less studied in enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA). We aimed to determine the ability of sacroiliac MRI to diagnose ERA patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study including 44 patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Each patient had a sacroiliac joint MRI. We divided patients into two groups: G1 patients with ERA and G2 patients with non-ERA subtype. RESULTS: ERA was noted in 61% of the cases. Sacroiliac joints were painful in 15 patients (34%). MRI was normal in 25 patients (57%) (G1:11 versus G2:14) and showed bone marrow edema in the sacroiliac joints in 19 patients (34%) (G1=16 versus G2=3, p=0.005). Sacroiliac joints MRI's sensitivity and specificity in the ERA diagnosis were 61.54% and 82.35%, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 84.21% and 58.33%, respectively. Furthermore, sacroiliac joint pain in the clinical examination was able to predict sacroiliac bone edema in MRI with an odds ratio of 6.8 (95% CI 1.68-28.09; p=0.006). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that sacroiliac joint MRI has good specificity and positive predictive value in the diagnosis of ERA patients among JIA patients. This underlines the usefulness of sacroiliac joint MRI in the early diagnosis of ERA patients.

Does sacroiliitis is a mandatory criterion for enthesitis-related arthritis diagnosis? / ¿La sacroilitis es un criterio obligatorio para el diagnóstico de artritis relacionada con entesitis?

Introduction and objectives: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sensitivity and specificity seem to be less studied in enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA). We aimed to determine the ability of sacroiliac MRI to diagnose ERA patients. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective study including 44 patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Each patient had a sacroiliac joint MRI. We divided patients into two groups: G1 patients with ERA and G2 patients with non-ERA subtype. Results: ERA was noted in 61% of the cases. Sacroiliac joints were painful in 15 patients (34%). MRI was normal in 25 patients (57%) (G1:11 versus G2:14) and showed bone marrow edema in the sacroiliac joints in 19 patients (34%) (G1=16 versus G2=3, p=0.005). Sacroiliac joints MRI's sensitivity and specificity in the ERA diagnosis were 61.54% and 82.35%, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 84.21% and 58.33%, respectively. Furthermore, sacroiliac joint pain in the clinical examination was able to predict sacroiliac bone edema in MRI with an odds ratio of 6.8 (95% CI 1.68–28.09; p=0.006). Conclusion: Our study showed that sacroiliac joint MRI has good specificity and positive predictive value in the diagnosis of ERA patients among JIA patients. This underlines the usefulness of sacroiliac joint MRI in the early diagnosis of ERA patients.(AU)

Introducción y objetivos: La sensibilidad y especificidad de la resonancia magnética parecen estar menos estudiadas en la artritis relacionada con entesitis (ERA). Nuestro objetivo era determinar la capacidad de la resonancia magnética de la articulación sacroilíaca para diagnosticar pacientes con ERA. Materiales y métodos: Realizamos un estudio retrospectivo que incluyó a 44 pacientes con artritis idiopática juvenil (AIJ). A cada paciente se le realizó una resonancia magnética de la articulación sacroilíaca. Dividimos a los pacientes en dos grupos: G1: pacientes con ERA y G2: pacientes con subtipo no ERA. Resultados: Se observó ERA en 61% de los casos. Las articulaciones sacroilíacas resultaron dolorosas en 15 pacientes (34%). La resonancia magnética fue normal en 25 pacientes (57%) (G1:11 vs. G2:14) y mostró edema de médula ósea en las articulaciones sacroilíacas en 19 pacientes (34%) (G1=16 vs. G2=3, p=0,005). La sensibilidad y especificidad de la resonancia magnética de articulaciones sacroilíacas en el diagnóstico de ERA fueron de 61,54 y 82,35%, respectivamente. Los valores predictivos positivos y negativos fueron 84,21 y 58,33%, respectivamente. Además, el dolor en la articulación sacroilíaca en el examen clínico fue capaz de predecir el edema del hueso sacroilíaco en la resonancia magnética con un odds ratio de 6,8 (IC 95%: 1,68 a 28,09; p=0,006). Conclusión: Nuestro estudio demostró que la resonancia magnética de la articulación sacroilíaca tiene buena especificidad y valor predictivo positivo en el diagnóstico de pacientes con ERA entre pacientes con AIJ. Esto subraya la utilidad de la resonancia magnética de la articulación sacroilíaca en el diagnóstico temprano de pacientes con ERA.(AU)

Enfermedad de Scheuermann lumbar atípica en rara asociación con artritis idiopática juvenil / Atypical lumbar Scheuermann disease and juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a rarely association

El dolor lumbar en los adolescentes es causa frecuente de motivo de consulta en reumatología y obedece a diferentes causas. Se presenta un caso clínico de un adolescente de 14 años de edad, de procedencia rural que acudió a consulta refiriendo dolor y aumento de volumen de ambas rodillas de 3 meses de evolución, acompañado de dolor lumbar desde hacía más de 2 años y que había requerido tratamiento con antinflamatorios no esteroideos y reposo, sin otros síntomas sistémicos acompañantes. Al examen físico se encontró artritis de rodillas, aumento de la cifosis fisiológica en la columna dorsal y puntos sacroilíacos positivos. En los exámenes complementarios fue significativa la presencia del HLA-B27, sinovitis en bolsa subcuadricipital bilateral detectada mediante ultrasonido de rodillas, así como hallazgos en las radiografías a nivel de los cuerpos de las vértebras lumbares característicos de la enfermedad de Scheuermann, y esclerosis de ambas sacroilíacas, características de artritis idiopática juvenil. Se concluyó que el paciente padecía de dos afecciones que por mecanismos diferentes causan dolor lumbar(AU)

Low back pain in adolescents is a frequent reason for consultation in rheumatology and is due to different causes. A clinical case of a 14-year-old adolescent from rural origin who comes to the clinic reporting pain and volume increase in both knees of three months of evolution accompanied by low back pain of more than two years of evolution that had required treatment is presented. with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and rest, without other accompanying systemic symptoms, physical examination revealed knee arthritis, increased physiological kyphosis in the thoracic spine and positive sacroiliac points. In the complementary tests, the presence of HLA-B27, synovitis in the bilateral sub quadriceps bursa on ultrasound of the knees, findings in the radiographs at the level of the bodies of the lumbar vertebrae characteristic of Scheuermann's disease, and sclerosis of both sacroiliacs' characteristic of juvenile idiopathic arthritis, it is concluded that the patient suffers from two conditions, which by different mechanisms cause low back pain(AU)

Diffuse Peripheral Enthesitis in Metabolic Syndrome: A Retrospective Clinical and Power Doppler Ultrasound Study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate peripheral enthesitis with power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS) in patients presenting low back pain (LBP) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) in comparison with patients with only LBP, to correlate US scores with clinical-anthropometric characteristics, and to define any relationship between enthesitis and concurrent diffuse idiopathic hyperostosis syndrome (DISH). METHODS: Sixty outpatients with LBP and MetS, evaluated with multi-site entheseal PDUS, scoring inflammatory and structural damage changes, were retrospectively analyzed. A group of 60 subjects with LBP, without MetS and evaluated with the same protocol, was analyzed as the control group. RESULTS: Patients showed overweight (BMI 29.8) and low-grade inflammatory state (C-reactive protein [CRP] 0.58mg/dL, erythrosedimentation rate [ESR] 20.2mm/h). Enthesitis was demonstrated in 52 (86%) patients (17.6% entheses), and in 8 controls (13.3%) (p<.00001). PD signals (15% of patients) were associated with entheseal pain (p=.0138). US scores correlated with body mass index (BMI), pain, type 2 diabetes. In 28 (46%) patients a concurrent DISH was diagnosed, correlating with older age (p<.0001), CRP (p=.0428), ESR (p=.0069) and PDUS scores (p=.0312 inflammatory, p=.0071 structural). MetS had a strong association (OR 4.375, p=.0007) with concurrent DISH. CONCLUSIONS: Diffuse peripheral enthesitis is very common in MetS. Almost half of MetS patients can have a concurrent diagnosis of DISH; they are older, with higher inflammation, and higher PDUS enthesitis scores.

Diffuse Peripheral Enthesitis in Metabolic Syndrome: A Retrospective Clinical and Power Doppler Ultrasound Study / Entesitis periférica difusa en el síndrome metabólico: estudio clínico retrospectivo y de ecografía Power Doppler

Objectives: To investigate peripheral enthesitis with power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS) in patients presenting low back pain (LBP) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) in comparison with patients with only LBP, to correlate US scores with clinical-anthropometric characteristics, and to define any relationship between enthesitis and concurrent diffuse idiopathic hyperostosis syndrome (DISH). Methods: Sixty outpatients with LBP and MetS, evaluated with multi-site entheseal PDUS, scoring inflammatory and structural damage changes, were retrospectively analyzed. A group of 60 subjects with LBP, without MetS and evaluated with the same protocol, was analyzed as the control group. Results: Patients showed overweight (BMI 29.8) and low-grade inflammatory state (C-reactive protein [CRP] 0.58mg/dL, erythrosedimentation rate [ESR] 20.2mm/h). Enthesitis was demonstrated in 52 (86%) patients (17.6% entheses), and in 8 controls (13.3%) (p<.00001). PD signals (15% of patients) were associated with entheseal pain (p=.0138). US scores correlated with body mass index (BMI), pain, type 2 diabetes. In 28 (46%) patients a concurrent DISH was diagnosed, correlating with older age (p<.0001), CRP (p=.0428), ESR (p=.0069) and PDUS scores (p=.0312 inflammatory, p=.0071 structural). MetS had a strong association (OR 4.375, p=.0007) with concurrent DISH. Conclusions: Diffuse peripheral enthesitis is very common in MetS. Almost half of MetS patients can have a concurrent diagnosis of DISH; they are older, with higher inflammation, and higher PDUS enthesitis scores.(AU)

Objetivos: Estudiar la entesitis periférica con ecografía Power Doppler (PDUS) en pacientes que presentan dolor lumbar (DL) y síndrome metabólico (SM), en comparación con los pacientes con DL únicamente, para correlacionar las puntuaciones ecográficas con las características clínico-antroprométicas, y definir cualquier relación entre entesitis y síndrome de hiperostosis idiopática difusa (DISH). Métodos: Se evaluaron 60 pacientes con DL y SM mediante PDUS para entesitis de múltiples sitios, valorando retrospectivamente los cambios inflamatorios y de daños estructurales. Un grupo de 60 sujetos con DL y sin SM fue evaluado utilizando el mismo protocolo, como grupo control. Resultados: Los pacientes reflejaron sobrepeso (IMC 29,8) y estado inflamatorio de bajo grado (proteína C reactiva [PCR] 0,58 mg/dL, tasa de eritrosedimentación [TES] 20,2 mm/h). Se demostró entesitis en 52 (86%) pacientes (17,6% entesis), y ocho controles (13,3%) (p < 0,00001). Las señales PD (15% de pacientes) estuvieron asociadas a dolor debido a entesitis (p = 0,0138). Las puntuaciones ecográficas se correlacionaron con índice de masa corporal (IMC), dolor y diabetes tipo 2. En 28 (46%) pacientes se diagnosticó DISH concurrente, correlacionado con edad avanzada (p < 0,0001), PCR (p = 0,0428), TES (p = 0,0069) y puntuaciones PDUS (p = 0,0312 inflamatoria, p = 0,0071 estructural). El SM tuvo una fuerte asociación (OR 4,375, p = 0,0007) con DISH concurrente. Conclusiones: La entesitis periférica difusa es muy común en el SM. Casi la mitad de los pacientes con SM pueden tener diagnóstico concurrente de DISH; son pacientes de edad avanzada, con mayor inflamación, y mayores puntuaciones de entesitis mediante PDUS.(AU)

Familial mediterranean fever patients may have unmet needs for the treatments of exertional leg pain and enthesitis.

INTRODUCTION: Exertional leg pain (ELP) and enthesitis are musculoskeletal findings in familial Mediterranean fever (FMF). They are not accepted as principal treatment targets. In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of treatments on ELP and enthesitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have included 218 FMF patients to the study. We retrospectively compared the FMF attacks' frequency, duration and intensity (FMF attack VAS score) and levels of ELP VAS and enthesitis VAS scores between pre-treatment stage and while patients were on treatment at the last visit. RESULTS: Forty-nine (22.5%) and 52 (23.9%) of the patients had enthesitis and ELP respectively. All patients were on colchicine treatment. Serositis attacks respond the treatments significantly. Moreover, both ELP VAS scores (p=0.002) and enthesis VAS scores (p=0.17) were improved with treatment. But only improvement in ELP VAS scores was significant. CONCLUSION: FMF treatments had favourable effect on ELP and enthesitis in FMF patients. However, the response rates would be inadequate. Therefore, there would be unmet need for treatment of both conditions.

Familial mediterranean fever patients may have unmet needs for the treatments of exertional leg pain and enthesitis / Los pacientes con fiebre mediterránea familiar podrían tener necesidades no satisfechas de tratamiento del dolor en piernas con el esfuerzo y entesitis

Introduction: Exertional leg pain (ELP) and enthesitis are musculoskeletal findings in familial Mediterranean fever (FMF). They are not accepted as principal treatment targets. In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of treatments on ELP and enthesitis. Material and methods: We have included 218 FMF patients to the study. We retrospectively compared the FMF attacks’ frequency, duration and intensity (FMF attack VAS score) and levels of ELP VAS and enthesitis VAS scores between pre-treatment stage and while patients were on treatment at the last visit. Results: Forty-nine (22.5%) and 52 (23.9%) of the patients had enthesitis and ELP respectively. All patients were on colchicine treatment. Serositis attacks respond the treatments significantly. Moreover, both ELP VAS scores (p=0.002) and enthesis VAS scores (p=0.17) were improved with treatment. But only improvement in ELP VAS scores was significant. Conclusion: FMF treatments had favourable effect on ELP and enthesitis in FMF patients. However, the response rates would be inadequate. Therefore, there would be unmet need for treatment of both conditions.(AU)

Introducción: El dolor en piernas con el esfuerzo (ELP) y la entesitis son hallazgos musculoesqueléticos en la fiebre mediterránea familiar (FMF), no aceptados como dianas de tratamiento principales. En este estudio evaluamos la efectividad de los tratamientos para ELP y entesitis. Material y métodos: Incluimos en el estudio a 218 pacientes con FMF. Comparamos retrospectivamente la frecuencia de los ataques de FMF, su duración e intensidad (escala analógica visual [VAS] del ataque de FMF) y los niveles VAS para ELP y las puntuaciones VAS para entesitis entre la etapa previa al tratamiento y la etapa en que los pacientes estaban siendo tratados en la última visita. Resultados: Cuarenta y nueve (22,5%) y 52 (23,9%) pacientes tuvieron entesitis y ELP, respectivamente. Todos los pacientes recibieron colchicina. Los ataques de serositis respondieron significativamente a los tratamientos. Además, tanto las puntuaciones VAS para ELP (p=0,002) como para entesis (p=0,17) mejoraron con el tratamiento, pero únicamente fueron significativas las puntuaciones VAS para ELP. Conclusión: Los tratamientos para FMF tuvieron un efecto favorable para ELP y entesitis en los pacientes con FMF. Sin embargo, las tasas de respuesta serían inadecuadas. Por tanto, existiría una necesidad no satisfecha de tratamiento de ambas situaciones.(AU)

Familial Mediterranean Fever Patients may have Unmet Needs for the Treatments of Exertional Leg Pain and Enthesitis.

INTRODUCTION: Exertional leg pain (ELP) and enthesitis are musculoskeletal findings in familial Mediterranean fever (FMF). They are not accepted as principal treatment targets. In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of treatments on ELP and enthesitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have included 218 FMF patients to the study. We retrospectively compared the FMF attacks' frequency, duration and intensity (FMF attack VAS score) and levels of ELP VAS and enthesitis VAS scores between pre-treatment stage and while patients were on treatment at the last visit. RESULTS: Forty-nine (22.5%) and 52 (23.9%) of the patients had enthesitis and ELP respectively. All patients were on colchicine treatment. Serositis attacks respond the treatments significantly. Moreover, both ELP VAS scores (p=0.002) and enthesis VAS scores (p=0.17) were improved with treatment. But only improvement in ELP VAS scores was significant. CONCLUSION: FMF treatments had favourable effect on ELP and enthesitis in FMF patients. However, the response rates would be inadequate. Therefore, there would be unmet need for treatment of both conditions.

Diffuse Peripheral Enthesitis in Metabolic Syndrome: A Retrospective Clinical and Power Doppler Ultrasound Study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate peripheral enthesitis with power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS) in patients presenting low back pain (LBP) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) in comparison with patients with only LBP, to correlate US scores with clinical-anthropometric characteristics, and to define any relationship between enthesitis and concurrent diffuse idiopathic hyperostosis syndrome (DISH). METHODS: Sixty outpatients with LBP and MetS, evaluated with multi-site entheseal PDUS, scoring inflammatory and structural damage changes, were retrospectively analyzed. A group of 60 subjects with LBP, without MetS and evaluated with the same protocol, was analyzed as the control group. RESULTS: Patients showed overweight (BMI 29.8) and low-grade inflammatory state (C-reactive protein [CRP] 0.58mg/dL, erythrosedimentation rate [ESR] 20.2mm/h). Enthesitis was demonstrated in 52 (86%) patients (17.6% entheses), and in 8 controls (13.3%) (p<.00001). PD signals (15% of patients) were associated with entheseal pain (p=.0138). US scores correlated with body mass index (BMI), pain, type 2 diabetes. In 28 (46%) patients a concurrent DISH was diagnosed, correlating with older age (p<.0001), CRP (p=.0428), ESR (p=.0069) and PDUS scores (p=.0312 inflammatory, p=.0071 structural). MetS had a strong association (OR 4.375, p=.0007) with concurrent DISH. CONCLUSIONS: Diffuse peripheral enthesitis is very common in MetS. Almost half of MetS patients can have a concurrent diagnosis of DISH; they are older, with higher inflammation, and higher PDUS enthesitis scores.

Artritis como debut de enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal en pediatría / Arthritis as clinical presentation of inflammatory bowel disease in children

La incidencia de enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal en la edad pediátrica se ha incrementado mundialmente en las últimas décadas. La forma de presentación puede ser diversa y, hasta en un 6-35 %, las manifestaciones extraintestinales pueden ser el debut; la artritis periférica es la más frecuente de estas. Una presentación atípica implica un retraso diagnóstico y, asociado a que el fenotipo de enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal es más grave en los niños, conlleva un incremento de las complicaciones intestinales y secuelas asociadas. Se presentan dos casos clínicos de enfermedad de Crohn cuya clínica inicial fue la claudicación de la marcha por una artritis periférica y una entesitis, respectivamente.

Inflammatory bowel disease in children has increased worldwide during the last decades. Clinical presentations are diverse and extraintestinal manifestations are the presenting sign in 6-35 % of patients, the most common of them being peripheral arthritis. An atypical clinical presentation results in diagnosis delay and, added to the greater seriousness of inflammatory bowel disease phenotypes in children, it entails more intestinal complications and sequelae. We describe two cases of inflammatory bowel disease with an initial symptom of lameness due to peripheral arthritis and enthesitis, respectively.

Evaluación del dolor en el adulto mayor / Evaluation of the pain in older people

Resumen: Objetivo: Comparar las informaciones obtenidas del porcentaje verbal de mejoría declarada verbalmente con la escala visual analógica (EVA) en personas con edad menor y mayor o igual de 65 años. Pacientes y métodos: Fueron evaluados 95 individuos con dolor agudo en el hombro (entesitis). Fue solicitado en cada uno de ellos medir la intensidad del dolor a través de la EVA tras un tratamiento médico con infiltración de corticosteroide en el hombro; fueron examinados una semana después, con una nueva medición de la intensidad del dolor verbalmente. Enseguida, las informaciones fueron comparadas entre pacientes con edad mayor o igual y menor de 65 años. Resultados: Se utilizó una diferencia de hasta 10% en módulo (valor absoluto) entre el porcentaje verbalmente declarado y el calculado con base en las medidas declaradas en la EVA. En los sujetos < 65 años, la frecuencia de casos donde la variación entre el porcentaje de mejoría verbalmente declarado y el calculado excede 10% fue de 29.8%; entre las personas ≥ 65 años la discrepancia ocurrió en 60.95%. Conclusión: El análisis de este estudio utilizó distintos métodos descriptivos e inferenciales para investigar las hipótesis levantadas; dentro de las herramientas empleadas, una confirma la hipótesis sobre los individuos ≥ 65 años y nos lleva a recomendar que el uso de la EVA para este grupo etario sea realizado con cautela y orientación.

Abstract: Objective: To compare the information obtained of the percentage of improvement declared orally with the improvement marked in the visual analogical scale (VAS) in patients under and over 65 years of age. Patients and methods: Ninety-five individuals with acute shoulder pain (enthesitis) were evaluated. The subjects were requested to mark the pain intensity in the VAS before a treatment with corticosteroid injection in the shoulder and were evaluated again through the VAS one week after the procedure. They were also requested to declare orally the pain intensity. Then, the information was compared between patients aged under and over 65 years of age. Results: 29.8% of those younger than 65 years, and 60.95% of those older than that age presented more than 10% difference between orally stated and calculated pain relief percentage based on the VSA. Conclusion: The difference between the orally stated and the calculated pain relief percentage based on the VSA was significantly higher in the group of those older than 65 years. This finding proved that the VAS is a poor method to evaluate pain relief in the senior population.

Nail psoriasis as a predictor of the development of psoriatic arthritis.

Psoriatic arthritis is a psoriasis-related spondyloarthropathy that occurs in 20-30% of patients with psoriasis. Various imaging studies have demonstrated that there is a considerable proportion of undiagnosed psoriatic arthritis among patients with psoriasis. Since early detection and treatment of psoriatic arthritis could, ultimately, allow the prevention of clinical and radiologic progression of the disease, there is the need to establish clinical indicators to detect this risk. Nail psoriasis has been proposed as a predictor for the development of psoriatic arthritis. The inflammation involving the entheses, called enthesitis, is an early inflammatory change seen in psoriatic arthritis, and nail changes appear to result from the close relationship between the nail and the enthesis of the distal interphalangeal extensor tendon, one of the main entheseal compartments affected in psoriatic arthritis. As skin lesions precede articular symptoms in more than 75-80% of patients with psoriatic arthritis, dermatologists may play a key role in the early detection and management of psoriatic arthritis.

Patología inflamatoria de columna en niños y adolescentes / Inflammatory spine pathology in children and adolescents

Chronic inflammatory axial pain is an uncommon pediatric syndrome, brings a number of diseases affecting the axial skeleton. It is characterized by unknown etiology, with recognizing genetic susceptibility factors. The medical clinician should be performed to establish the diagnosis, making accurate therapy for long-term success and working to get a good quality of life. Current classifications established for children and young patients forms are limited by the pediatric medical short follow-up age. Two international classifications (a) International League of Associations for Rheumatology and (b) Classification of juvenile spondyloarthropathies Spondylarthropathy European group Study Group to achieve approximate diagnosis for pediatric rheumatology forms. The adult rheumatologist usually who will establish the definitive diagnosis and prognosis. The chronic inflammatory axial pain needs an unification of classification criteria for children and adults in order to facilitate the scientific communication and medical transition.

El dolor axial inflamatorio crónico es una entidad infrecuente en Pediatría, y agrupa una serie de patologías que afectan el esqueleto axial. este grupo de enfermedades son de etiología aún desconocida, reconociendo factores de susceptibilidad genética en ellas. Su importancia está en el enfoque que el clínico debe realizar para establecer el diagnóstico, realizar una terapia precoz para obtener buenos resultados a largo plazo y procurar que el paciente obtenga una buena calidad de vida. Las clasificaciones actuales establecidas para las formas infantojuveniles se ven limitadas por lo breve del periodo de seguimiento etario, además que se hace necesario aplicar dos clasificaciones internacionales (a) International League of Associations for Rheumatology y (b) Clasificación de Espondiloartropatías Juveniles del European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group para lograr el diagnóstico aproximado. Es necesario considerar que en muchos casos será el reumatólogo de adultos quien establecerá el diagnóstico y pronóstico definitivo. Se reconoce que este grupo de patología inflamatoria crónica requiere unificación de criterios de clasificación en niños y adultos para facilitar la comunicación científica y de transición.

Entesis, entesopatía y espondiloartritis / Entheses, enthesopathy and spondyloarthritis

Las espondiloartritis (SpA) comprenden un grupo heterogéneo de enfermedades inflamatorias articulares que comparten varias características clínicas y de laboratorio, una fuerte tendencia a la asociación familiar dada por una susceptibilidad genética relacionada con la presencia del antígeno de histocompatibilidad HLA-B27, compromiso de las entesis, afectación predominante del esqueleto axial, artritis asimétrica de grandes articulaciones en los miembros inferiores y relación con la infección como factor desencadenante de las mismas. Las SpA incluyen varios subtipos: la artropatía psoriásica (PsA), las espondiloartritis no definidas (uSpA), la artritis asociada a enfermedades inflamatorias intestinales (EII), la artritis reactiva (ReA) y la espondilitis anquilosante (EA). La característica histopatológica fundamental de las SpA es la entesitis, la cual está dada por la inflamación patológica de las entesis comprometidas, que son los sitios de inserción de los tendones, ligamentos, fascias y cápsulas articulares al hueso; así como también el sitio de unión del cartílago al hueso subcondral.

Spondyloarthritis are a heterogeneous group of inflammatory joint diseases, which share clinic and laboratory characteristics, a strong relation to hereditary factors (mainly antigen HLA-B27), enthesesitis (most commonly affecting axial skeleton), large joints asymmetric arthritis mostly in lower limbs, and its relationship with infections as a triggering factor. Spondyloarthitis include various subtypes: Psoriatic Arthropathy (PsA), Undifferentiated Spondiloarthritis (uSpA), Arthritis related to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) and Reactive Arthritis (ReA). Fundamental histopathologic characteristic of the Spondyloarthritis is enthesitis on the sites of attachment of tendons, ligaments, joint capsules and fascias to the bone, but also over the cartilage at the subchondral bone.

Espondiloartritis en el Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe. Descripción de una cohorte / Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe-Spondyloarthropathies. A cohort description

Las espondiloartritis comparten un contexto ambiental, genético y clínico. Objetivo. Conocer y describir el comportamiento demográfico, clínico y radiológico de pacientes con espondiloartritis en el Hospital Pablo Tobón desde el 1 de enero de 2005 hasta el 31 de diciembre de 2008. Materiales y métodos. Este es un estudio descriptivo, observacional, de corte transversal. Se empleó estadística descriptiva para las variables demográficas, clínicas, radiológicas y los diversos tipos de tratamiento. Resultados. 71 pacientes fueron identificados. Las características clínicas más importantes fueron: dolor lumbar inflamatorio en el 84% de los pacientes, entesopatía, 67%; artritis periférica, 64% y dolor glúteo alternante, 57%. Las articulaciones comprometidas con mayor frecuencia fueron: sacroilíacas, 62%; tobillos, 32%; rodillas, 30%; tarso, 14%. El 64% presentó sacroilitis radiológica. Las manifestaciones extraarticulares más frecuentes fueron: dactilitis, 22%; uveítis, 19%; compromiso renal, 5% y fibrosis pulmonar, 1%. Los índices de actividad (BASDAI) fueron de 4.82 y la función (BASFI) de 4. 54% y 34% de los pacientes tenían eritrosedimentación y PCR elevada, respectivamente. El HLA B27 + en el 52%. Los DMARDs (sulfasalazina y metotrexate) fueron los medicamentos más usados en el 68% de los casos. Le siguieron los AINES en el 52% y los medicamentos anti-TNF en el 42% de los pacientes (Infliximab 20%, adalimumab 16% y etanercept 6%). Conclusión. Nuestros pacientes tenían una enfermedad activa y con limitación funcional. Se encontró un alto porcentaje de pacientes con espondiloartritis indiferenciada. La dactilitis fue la manifestación extraarticular más frecuente y el compromiso radiológico fue similar al descrito en la literatura. Palabras clave: espondiloartritis, índices de actividad, dactilitis, entesitis.

Spondyloartropahties share a genetic, clinical and environmental context. Objective. To describe demographic, clinical and radiological characteristics of spondyloarthropathies in a tertiary hospital. Methods. Descriptive analysis of a 71 patients. Demographics, clinical, radiological and treatment modalities are shown. Results. A total of 71 patients were identified. Low back pain 84%, entesopathye 67%, peripheral arthritis 64% and alternant buttock pain were often seen. The most common joint involved were sacroiliac joints 62%, ankles 32%, knees 30%, tarsal joints 14%. Radiological sacroiliacs involvement 64%. Dactilytis 22%, uveitis 19%, renal and pulmonary involvement were seen 5% and 1% respectively. Activity and functional indexes were (BASDAI) 4.82 and (BASFI) 4. High ESR and PCR were seen 54% and 34%, while HLA B27+52%. DMARDs (sulfasalazine and methotrexate) were used 68%. NSAIDs 52%. Anti-TNF blockers 42% (Infliximab 20%, adalimumab 16% and etanercept 6%). Conclusion. Our patients shown an active disease. A high incidence of undifferentiated spondyloarthropahies was found. Dactylitis was the most common extraarticular manifestation and radiological findings were similar to previously reported in the literature.