Helicobacter pylori infection is associated with decreased odds for eosinophilic esophagitis in Mexican patients. / La infección por Helicobacter pylori se asocia con disminución del riesgo de esofagitis eosinofílica en pacientes mexicanos.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is increasing in some regions of the world. Retrospective studies have found an inverse association with Helicobacter pylori infection (H. pylori). A recent prospective study has questioned this relationship. We aimed to evaluate this relationship in Mexican patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated adult patients without prior eradication of H. pylori. Cases were defined by the presence of esophageal symptoms and >15 eosinophils/high power field (HPF) in the esophageal biopsy. Controls were defined by the presence of <15 eosinophils/HPF in esophageal biopsy. H. pylori infection was defined by histology. Patients were matched by age and gender assigning four controls per case. RESULTS: We included 190 patients: 38 cases and 152 controls. Cases had higher frequency of atopy, dysphagia, food impaction, peripheral eosinophilia, and endoscopic EoE abnormalities. The overall prevalence of H. pylori was 63.6%. Cases had significantly lower prevalence of H. pylori than controls (36.8% vs. 70.4%, OR 0.21 95% CI 0.08-0.69, p = 0.001). Atopic patients had lower prevalence of H. pylori than non-atopic: 13.1% vs. 50.5% (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.06-0.69, p < 0.001), particularly allergic rhinitis and food allergy. CONCLUSIONS: We observed an inverse relationship between H. pylori and EoE as well as atopy. Studies in experimental models of EoE that clarify the role of H. pylori in this interaction are required, as well as robust studies that include other factors (socioeconomic, cultural, microbiota, etc.) in order to clarify this relationship.

Esofagitis eosinofílica de tórpida evolución / Eosinophilic esophagitis with torpid evolution

Introducción: La esofagitis eosinofílica es una enfermedad inmunomediada, crónica y progresiva, combinando disfunción esofágica e infiltrado eosinofílico exclusivo del esófago. Tanto su diagnóstico como su respuesta a los tratamientos requieren de evaluación histológica mediante endoscopias repetidas. Caso clínico. Varón de 11 años con disfagia para sólidos de años de evolución con empeoramiento en los últimos meses; angustia ante las ingestas con estancamiento ponderal; vómitos en impactaciones alimentarias; pirosis postprandial. Antecedentes patológicos: broncoespasmos de repetición y sensibilización a Alternaria. Exploración física: signos de hipotrofia pondero-estatural (somatometría: alrededor de –2 desviaciones estándares; Carrascosa 2017). Pruebas complementarias: analítica general sin alteraciones significativas incluyendo inmunoglobulinas E específicas alimentarias; prick test sensibilización a neumoalérgenos; gastroscopia mucosa esofágica edematosa, estrías longitudinales y exudados blanquecinos, mucosa gástrica signos de gastritis, mucosa duodenal normal; histología con un máximo 35 eosinófilos por campos de gran aumento y gastritis crónica leve-moderada con infección por Helicobacter pylori. Tratamiento y evolución: inducción a la remisión con inhibidores bomba de protones a dosis altas con buena respuesta clínica y macroscópica (parcial histológica), reduciendo a dosis de mantenimiento; ante recaída macroscópica (no histológica) se cambia a dieta exenta de leche y gluten sin respuesta; segundo intento de remisión con inhibidores sin éxito; finalmente se pautan corticoides deglutidos con buena respuesta tanto macroscópica como histológica; pendiente control con dosis de mantenimiento, asintomático. Comentarios. Como se aprecia en nuestro caso, esta enfermedad conlleva un difícil manejo ante la afectación parcheada de la mucosa y la discordancia clínico-histológica, lo que complica la interpretación de sus resultados.(AU)

Introduction: Eosinophilic esophagitis is an immunemediated, chronic and progressive disease, combining esophageal dysfunction and eosinophilic infiltrate exclusive to the esophagus. Both its diagnosis and its response to treatments require histological evaluation through repeated endoscopies. Case report. 11-year-old male with dysphagia for solids of years of evolution with worsening in recent months; anxiety before eating with weight stagnation; vomiting in food impactions; postprandial heartburn. Pathological history: repeated bronchospasms and sensitization to Alternaria. Physical examination: signs of weight-height hypotrophy (somatometry: around –2 standard deviations; Carrascosa 2017). Complementary tests: general blood test without significant alterations including food-specific immunoglobulins E; prick test sensitization to pneumoallergens; gastroscopy edematous esophageal mucosa, longitudinal furrows and whitish exudates, gastric mucosa signs of gastritis, normal duodenal mucosa; histology with a maximum of 35 eosinophils per high-power fields and mild-moderate chronic gastritis with Helicobacter pylori infection. Treatment and evolution: induction of remission with high-dose proton pump inhibitors with good clinical and macroscopic response (partial histological), reducing to maintenance doses; In the event of a macroscopic (non-histological) relapse, a diet free of milk and gluten is started without response; second attempt at remission with inhibitors without success; finally, swallowed corticosteroids are prescribed with good macroscopic and histological response; pending control with maintenance dose, asymptomatic. Discussion. Like our case shows, this disease has a difficult management due to patchy involvement of the mucosa and clinical-histological discordance, which complicates the interpretation of its results.(AU)

The Multiple Trajectories of the Allergic March

The allergic march comprises the sequential appearance of a series of allergic comorbidities. However, variability in the onset and progression of allergic diseases generates a heterogeneous scenario that does not follow a linear and single trajectory. Almost half of the pediatric population presents at least 1 allergy symptom. However, only 4%-6% present multimorbidity, with several allergic diseases co-occurring. It has recently been shown that although they share etiological mechanisms and risk factors, allergic diseases arise independently. In most cases, progression is not consecutive, or at least not the same in all patients. TH2-mediated inflammation, epithelial barrier dysfunction, and genetic predisposition play a fundamental role in the etiology of allergic diseases, on which the interaction with the exposome acts decisively. Therefore, studying diseases from an omics point of view is essential when attempting to describe the various trajectories of allergic progression and to propose effective interventions to prevent multimorbidity. In this narrative review, we provide an overview of the current perception of the allergic march, including clinical observations, omics data, risk factors, and measures aimed at modifying its course or even preventing its onset. (AU)

La marcha alérgica ha dado respuesta durante mucho tiempo a un escenario de aparición secuencial de diferentes comorbilidades alérgicas. Sin embargo, la variabilidad en la aparición y progresión de las diferentes enfermedades alérgicas dibuja un escenario heterogéneo que no responde a una trayectoria lineal y única. Aunque en la actualidad casi la mitad de la población infantil presenta al menos un síntoma de alergia, tan solo un 4-6% presenta multimorbilidad, coexistiendo varias entidades alérgicas. Recientemente se ha demostrado que, aunque compartiendo mecanismos etiológicos y factores de riesgo, estas enfermedades alérgicas surgen de manera independiente y que, en la mayoría de los casos, no se observa una progresión consecutiva, o al menos, no la misma en todos los pacientes. La inflamación mediada por células T helper de tipo 2 (Th2), la disfunción de la barrera epitelial y la predisposición genética juegan un papel fundamental en la etiología de estas enfermedades, sobre los que actúan de manera determinante la interacción con el exposoma. Por ello, el estudio de las enfermedades, desde un punto de vista de las ómicas, es fundamental para describir las diferentes trayectorias de la marcha alérgica y proponer intervenciones eficaces para evitar escenarios de multimorbilidad. En esta revisión narrativa se incluye una descripción general de la percepción actual de la marcha alérgica, incluidas observaciones clínicas, datos ómicos, factores de riesgo y medidas preventivas propuestas para modificar su curso o incluso prevenir su aparición. (AU)

Biomecánica esofágica valorada mediante planimetría por impedancia (EndoFLIP™) en sujetos sanos y en pacientes con esofagitis eosinofílica. Valores de normalidad / Esophageal biomechanics assessed by impedance planimetry (EndoFLIPTM) in healthy subjects and in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. Normality values

Antecedentes: la esofagitis eosinofílica (EEo) activa se asocia a alteraciones en el calibre, la distensibilidad y la motilidad esofágica que podrían revertir con el tratamiento. Objetivos: estudiar el diámetro, la distensibilidad y la contractilidad esofágica en sujetos sanos comparándolos con pacientes con EEo antes y después del tratamiento. Métodos: estudio cuasiexperimental. Mediante EndoFLIP™, se analizaron el cuerpo esofágico y la unión esofagogástrica (UEG) de los tres grupos, y se diseñó un programa para obtener los valores de diámetro, distensibilidad y contractilidad esofágica. Resultados: incluimos diez voluntarios sanos (24-61 años, seis hombres) y nueve pacientes con EEo (21-52 años, siete hombres). El índice de distensibilidad de la UEG fue de 5,07 mm2/Hg en controles, 2,40 mm2/Hg en EEo antes del tratamiento y 2,46 mm2/Hg después; la meseta de distensibilidad fue de 20,02 mm, 15,43 mm y 17,41 mm, respectivamente; y el diámetro, de 21,90 mm, 17,73 mm y 18,30 mm, con diferencias significativas (p < 0,05) excepto entre los diámetros de controles y pacientes tratados (p = 0,079). Las contracciones anterógradas repetitivas aparecieron en el 90 % de los controles, en el 66,7 % de EEo a antes del tratamiento y en el 88,9 % después (p > 0,05). Conclusiones: el índice de distensibilidad de la UEG, la meseta de distensibilidad y el diámetro en controles son mayores que en pacientes, aunque seis semanas de tratamiento parece poco tiempo para ver cambios significativos en la biomecánica esofágica. Las contracciones anterógradas repetitivas son el patrón predominante en sanos y en EEo. Aportamos valores de normalidad de la biomecánica esofágica medida mediante planimetría por impedancia en nuestro entorno.(AU)

Background: active eosinophilic esophagitis is associated with esophageal caliber, distensibility and motility changes that may be reversed with treatment. Objectives: to study esophageal diameter, distensibility and contractility in healthy subjects compared to patients with eosinophilic esophagitis, both before and after treatment. Methods: a quasi-experimental study, EndoFLIP™, was used to analyze the esophageal body and esophago-gastric junction (EGJ) in all three groups, and a program was designed to obtain esophageal diameter, distensibility and contractility values. Results: ten healthy volunteers (24-61 years, six men) and nine patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (21-52 years, seven men) were included. The esophagogastric junction distensibility index was 5.07 mm2/Hg in the control subjects, 2.40 mm2/Hg in the subjects with eosinophilic esophagitis before treatment and 2.46 mm2/Hg after treatment. The distensibility plateau was 20.02 mm, 15.43 mm and 17.41 mm, respectively, and the diameter was 21.90 mm, 17.73 mm and 18.30 mm, showing significant differences (p < 0.05), except between control subjects and patients after treatment (p = 0.079). Repetitive antegrade contractions developed in 90 % of control subjects, 66.7 % of eosinophilic esophagitis patients before treatment and 88.9 % of the latter after treatment (p > 0.05). Conclusions: esophago-gastric junction distensibility index, distensibility plateau and diameter values were higher in controls than in patients, although six weeks of treatment seems a short period to observe significant changes in esophageal biomechanics. Repetitive antegrade contractions are the predominant pattern in healthy subjects and eosinophilic esophagitis. We provide normality values for esophageal biomechanics, measured by impedance planimetry in our setting.(AU)

Por fin responde a algo / Finally responds to something

La esofagitis eosinofílica es una enfermedad crónica inmunomediada cuya incidencia está aumentando a lo largo de los últimos años. Afecta preferentemente, pero no de manera exclusiva, a varones y a personas con antecedentes de atopia. Se estima que la prevalencia actual en los países desarrollados supera los 100 casos por cada 100 000 habitantes. Supone la causa más frecuente de disfagia e impactación alimentaria a lo largo de la edad pediátrica, y repercute negativamente sobre la calidad de vida. Afecta más a varones que a niñas. Su primer escalón terapéutico está constituido por: las dietas de exclusión, los inhibidores de la bomba de protones y los corticoides tópicos deglutidos. En casos refractarios, se puede emplear dupilumab, un biológico con capacidad anti-interleukina 4 y 13, con resultados muy prometedores. (AU)

Eosinophilic esophagitis is a chronic immune-mediated disease whose incidence has been increasing in recent years. It preferentially, but not exclusively, affects men and people with a history of atopy. It is estimated that the current prevalence in developed countries exceeds 100 cases per 100,000 inhabitants. It is the most common cause of dysphagia and food impaction throughout the pediatric age, and has a negative impact on quality of life. It affects boys more than girls. Its first therapeutic step consists of: exclusion diets, proton pump inhibitors and swallowed topical corticosteroids. In refractory cases, dupilumab, a biologic with anti-interleukin 4 and 13 capacity, can be used with very promising results. (AU)

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases with esophageal involvement: Analysis of 212 patients / Enfermedades gastrointestinales eosinofilicas con afectación esofágica: Análisis de 212 pacientes

Background Primary eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGID) are chronic inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal tract with unknown etiology. Features, utility, and evolution are still unknown in screening for EGID in adult patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Objectives To evaluate the prevalence, characteristics, comorbidities, and evolution of EGID in adults diagnosed with EoE and investigate differences between both groups. Methods Prospective unicenter observational and analytical study. Gastric and duodenal biopsies were obtained during upper baseline endoscopy in all consecutive EoE adult patients evaluated. A colonoscopy with colon biopsies was performed upon persistent diarrhea and normal duodenal biopsies. Results 212 EoE patients were included. Nine patients (4.3%) also showed significant eosinophilic infiltration in at least one organ within the digestive tract. The most common site affected was the small bowel (78%). Gastrointestinal symptoms (43% vs. 100%, p<0.002) and, more specifically, either abdominal pain or diarrhea (17% vs. 78%, p<0.001), some food sensitizations, and digestive comorbidities (p<0.05) were significantly more common in patients with EGID. Gastrointestinal symptoms were present in 94/212 (44%) patients, of whom 9 (10%) had EGID. Considering only abdominal pain or diarrhea, 20% suffered from it. Conclusions EGID rarely coexist with EoE, even when gastrointestinal symptoms are present. These findings advise against routine gastric, duodenal, or colon biopsies in adult EoE patients with gastrointestinal symptoms. Most of the characteristics of EoE do not change due to having EGID except gastrointestinal symptoms, digestive comorbidities, and sensitizations to some foods. The evolution was generally favorable despite intermittent adherence to treatment, especially maintenance (AU)

Antecedentes Las enfermedades gastrointestinales eosinofílicas primarias (EGIE) son trastornos inflamatorios crónicos del tracto gastrointestinal con etiología desconocida. Aún se desconocen las características, la utilidad y la evolución en el cribado de EGIE en pacientes adultos con esofagitis eosinofílica (EoE). Objetivos Evaluar la prevalencia, características, comorbilidades y evolución de las EGIE en adultos diagnosticados de EoE e investigar las diferencias entre ambos grupos. Métodos Estudio observacional y analítico prospectivo de un único centrro. Se obtuvieron biopsias gástricas y duodenales durante la endoscopia digestiva superior en todos los pacientes adultos con EoE consecutivos evaluados. Se realizó colonoscopia con biopsias de colon ante diarrea persistente y biopsias de duodeno normales. Resultados Se incluyeron 212 pacientes con EoE. Nueve pacientes (4,3%) también mostraron infiltración eosinofílica significativa en al menos un órgano dentro del tracto digestivo. El sitio más común afectado fue el intestino delgado (78%). Los síntomas gastrointestinales (43 vs. 100%, p < 0,002) y, más específicamente, dolor abdominal o diarrea (17 vs. 78%, p < 0,001), algunas sensibilizaciones alimentarias y comorbilidades digestivas (p < 0,05) fueron significativamente más comunes en pacientes con EGIE. Los síntomas gastrointestinales estuvieron presentes en 94/212 (44%) pacientes, de los cuales nueve (10%) tenían EGIE. Considerando solo dolor abdominal o diarrea, 20% la padecía. Conclusiones Las EGIE rara vez coexisten con EoE, incluso cuando hay síntomas gastrointestinales. Estos hallazgos desaconsejan las biopsias gástricas, duodenales o de colon de rutina en pacientes adultos con EoE con síntomas gastrointestinales. La mayoría de las características de la EoE no cambian por tener EGIE, excepto los síntomas gastrointestinales, las comorbilidades digestivas y las sensibilizaciones a algunos alimentos (AU)

Esofagitis eosinofílica, eficacia de las alternativas terapéuticas en el adulto: revisión sistemática / Eosinophilic esophagitis, efficacy of therapeutic alternatives in adults: a systematic review

Fundamentos: La esofagitis eosinofílica es hoy en día la principal causa de disfagia en el adulto. La elección de la terapia se debeconsensuar con el paciente. El objetivo de este trabajo fue revisar la bibliografía científica para conocer la eficacia de las distintasopciones terapéuticas de la esofagitis eosinofílica en el adulto. Métodos: Se realizó una búsqueda de artículos durante el mes de febrero de 2023 en las bases de datos dePubMed, Web ofScience, Scopus yScielo, empleando los términos de búsquedaeosinophilic esophagitis,therapeutics ytreatment, seleccionándoselos ensayos clínicos y estudios observacionales publicados en los últimos diez años en adultos.Resultados: Se obtuvieron un total de 1.138 artículos, de los cuales 41 fueron seleccionados tras aplicar los criterios de elegibilidad. De las terapias disponibles, el tratamiento más frecuentemente analizado fueron los corticoides deglutidos, seguido de las dietasde eliminación y de los inhibidores de la bomba de protones, predominando los ensayos clínicos. Los estudios arrojan resultadossobre la eficacia de estas terapias en la remisión histológica y clínica, tanto en la inducción como a largo plazo. Conclusiones: Existen fundamentalmente tres terapias en la esofagitis eosinofílica en el adulto, siendo todas superiores frentea placebo en respuesta histológica y clínica.(AU)

Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis is actually the main cause of dysphagia in adults. The choise of therapy must be agreedwith the patient. The objective of this study was to review the scientific literature to determine the efficacy of the different therapeuticoptions for eosinophilic esophagitis in adults.Methods: A search for articles was carried out during the month of February 2023 in the databasesPubMed, Web of Science,Scopus andScielo using the search terms:eosinophilic esophagitis,therapeutics andtreatment. Clinical trials and observational studiespublished in the last ten years in adults were selected. Results: A total of 1,138 articles were obtained, of which 41 were selected after applying the eligibility criteria. Of the availabletherapies, the most frequently analyzed treatment was swallowed corticosteroids, followed by elimination diets and proton pump inhibitors. Clinical trials predominated. The studies show results on the efficacy of these therapies in histological and clinical remission,both in induction and in the long-term. Conclusions: There are basically three therapies for eosinophilic esophagitis in adults, all of them are superior to placebo inhistological and clinical response.(AU)

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases with esophageal involvement: Analysis of 212 patients.

BACKGROUND: Primary eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGID) are chronic inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal tract with unknown etiology. Features, utility, and evolution are still unknown in screening for EGID in adult patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence, characteristics, comorbidities, and evolution of EGID in adults diagnosed with EoE and investigate differences between both groups. METHODS: Prospective unicenter observational and analytical study. Gastric and duodenal biopsies were obtained during upper baseline endoscopy in all consecutive EoE adult patients evaluated. A colonoscopy with colon biopsies was performed upon persistent diarrhea and normal duodenal biopsies. RESULTS: 212 EoE patients were included. Nine patients (4.3%) also showed significant eosinophilic infiltration in at least one organ within the digestive tract. The most common site affected was the small bowel (78%). Gastrointestinal symptoms (43% vs. 100%, p<0.002) and, more specifically, either abdominal pain or diarrhea (17% vs. 78%, p<0.001), some food sensitizations, and digestive comorbidities (p<0.05) were significantly more common in patients with EGID. Gastrointestinal symptoms were present in 94/212 (44%) patients, of whom 9 (10%) had EGID. Considering only abdominal pain or diarrhea, 20% suffered from it. CONCLUSIONS: EGID rarely coexist with EoE, even when gastrointestinal symptoms are present. These findings advise against routine gastric, duodenal, or colon biopsies in adult EoE patients with gastrointestinal symptoms. Most of the characteristics of EoE do not change due to having EGID except gastrointestinal symptoms, digestive comorbidities, and sensitizations to some foods. The evolution was generally favorable despite intermittent adherence to treatment, especially maintenance.

Seguridad de la endoscopia y biopsia esofágica en un paciente con esofagitis eosinofílica y enfermedad de Von Willebrand / Safety of esophageal endoscopy and biopsy in a patient with eosinophilic esophagitis and Von Willebrand disease

La esofagitis eosinofílica (EoE) es una enfermedad causada por una respuesta inmune frente a antígenos alimentarios en contacto con la mucosa esofágica; por su parte, la enfermedad de Von Willebrand (EVW) es el trastorno hemorrágico hereditario más común en los seres humanos. La característica central de todos los tipos de EVW, es la presencia de cantidades reducidas o de formas anormales del factor de Von Willebrand (FVW) en el torrente sanguíneo. Debido a que no se han reportado casos previos de EVW tipo 2A asociada a EoE, se describe este caso clínico con el objetivo principal de dar a conocer el hallazgo casual de estas dos patologías, la seguridad de la evaluación por endoscopia de vías digestivas altas y el pronóstico de posibles complicaciones

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a disease caused by an immune response against food antigens in contact with the esophageal mucosa; alternatively, Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder in humans. The central characteristic of all types of VWD is the presence of reduced amounts or abnormal forms of VWF in the bloodstream. Since no previous cases of VWD type 2A associated to EoE have been reported, this clinical case is described with the main objective to present the coincidental finding of these two pathologies, the safety of the evaluation by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and the prognosis of possible complications

Incidence and evolution of foreign body impaction in the upper gastrointestinal tract and its relationship with eosionophilic oesophagitis / Incidencia y evolución de las impactaciones por cuerpos extraños en el tracto digestivo superior y su relación con la esofagitis eosinofílica

Background: Foreign body impaction is a frequent indication of urgent endoscopy. One of the reasons for impaction is eosinophilic oesophagitis (EE). To analyze characteristics of oesophageal foreign body impactions and their relationship with eosinophilic oesophagitis.Methods: In this retrospective study, urgent endoscopies in a tertiary care centre were analyzed. We included all urgent endoscopies due to bolus and foreign body impactions performed between September 1st 2018 and September 1st 2020. We reviewed clinical data of all patients who were diagnosed with EE and compared it to impactions that were due to other motives. The mean follow-up time was 18.7 months.Results: 693 urgent endoscopy procedures were performed. 239 (34%) of these were due to foreign body ingestion. Mean age of the patients was 63 years old and 135 (63%) were men. EE was diagnosed in 36 (17%) patients. The factors associated with EE were age, to be younger than 50 years (OR, 7.3; 95% CI, 1.1–48.4; p=0.04), asthma/rhinitis/atopic dermatitis (OR, 8.9; 95% CI, 2.3–35.3; p=0.002), findings in the endoscopy as trachealization (OR, 9.7; 95% CI, 1.3–70.9; p=0.03) and psychotropic/calcium channel blocker drugs (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.009–0.9; p=0.04). 15 (7%) patients died. In 6 of them death was impaction-related. None patients with EE died.Conclusions: Foreign body impaction in the upper gastrointestinal tract due to EE is a frequent cause of urgent endoscopy. Being under 50 years of age, having asthma/rhinitis/atopic dermatitis, trachealization on the oesophagus and not taking psychotropic/calcium channel blocker drugs are factors associated with the diagnosis of EE. Mortality in the follow-up of patients without EE is important.(AU)

Antecedentes: La impactación por cuerpos extraños es una indicación frecuente de endoscopia urgente. Una de las causas de impactación es la esofagitis eosinofílica. Nuestro objetivo es analizar las características de las impactaciones por cuerpos extraños en el esófago y su relación con la esofagitis eosinofílica.Métodos: En este estudio retrospectivo, se analizan todas las endoscopias urgentes realizadas por impactación de alimentos y cuerpos extraños en un hospital terciario entre el 1 de septiembre de 2018 y el 1 de septiembre de 2020. Se analizan las características clínicas de los pacientes diagnosticados de esofagitis eosinofílica y se comparan con las impactaciones debidas a otros motivos. El seguimiento medio fue de 18,7 meses.Resultados: Se realizaron 693 procedimientos de endoscopia urgentes; de ellos, 239 (34%) fueron por impactación por cuerpos extraños. La edad media fue de 63 años y 135 (63%) eran hombres; 36 (17%) de todos los pacientes con impactación fueron diagnosticados de esofagitis eosinofílica. Los factores asociados a ella fueron la edad, ser menor de 50 años (OR 7,3; IC 95%: 1,1-48,4; p=0,04), el antecedente de asma y/o rinitis y/o dermatitis atópica (OR 8,9; IC 95%: 2,3-35,3; p=0,002), los hallazgos endoscópicos como traquealización (OR 9,7; IC 95%: 1,3-70,9; p=0,03) y el consumo de fármacos psicotrópicos o antagonistas del calcio (OR 0,09; IC 95%: 0,009-0,9; p=0,04). Fallecieron 15 (7%) pacientes, todos sin esofagitis eosinofílica y en 6 el fallecimiento se relacionó con las impactaciones.Conclusiones:La impactación por cuerpos extraños en el tubo digestivo por esofagitis eosinofílica es una entidad frecuente en los servicios de endoscopia de urgencia.(AU)

Incidence and evolution of foreign body impaction in the upper gastrointestinal tract and its relationship with eosionophilic oesophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Foreign body impaction is a frequent indication of urgent endoscopy. One of the reasons for impaction is eosinophilic oesophagitis (EE). To analyze characteristics of oesophageal foreign body impactions and their relationship with eosinophilic oesophagitis. METHODS: In this retrospective study, urgent endoscopies in a tertiary care centre were analyzed. We included all urgent endoscopies due to bolus and foreign body impactions performed between September 1st 2018 and September 1st 2020. We reviewed clinical data of all patients who were diagnosed with EE and compared it to impactions that were due to other motives. The mean follow-up time was 18.7 months. RESULTS: 693 urgent endoscopy procedures were performed. 239 (34%) of these were due to foreign body ingestion. Mean age of the patients was 63 years old and 135 (63%) were men. EE was diagnosed in 36 (17%) patients. The factors associated with EE were age, to be younger than 50 years (OR, 7.3; 95% CI, 1.1-48.4; p=0.04), asthma/rhinitis/atopic dermatitis (OR, 8.9; 95% CI, 2.3-35.3; p=0.002), findings in the endoscopy as trachealization (OR, 9.7; 95% CI, 1.3-70.9; p=0.03) and psychotropic/calcium channel blocker drugs (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.009-0.9; p=0.04). 15 (7%) patients died. In 6 of them death was impaction-related. None patients with EE died. CONCLUSIONS: Foreign body impaction in the upper gastrointestinal tract due to EE is a frequent cause of urgent endoscopy. Being under 50 years of age, having asthma/rhinitis/atopic dermatitis, trachealization on the oesophagus and not taking psychotropic/calcium channel blocker drugs are factors associated with the diagnosis of EE. Mortality in the follow-up of patients without EE is important.

Dupilumab: A Review of Present Indications and Off-Label Uses

Recent advances in our understanding of T2 inflammation have revealed more diseases in which T2 inflammation is involved. Dupilumabis a recently developed monoclonal antibody that blocks signaling of IL-4 and IL-13, both of which are crucial cytokines in the T2 response.New possible indications are increasingly explored and include skin diseases, such as prurigo nodularis, nummular eczema, allergic contactdermatitis, chronic hand eczema, spontaneous chronic urticaria, bullous pemphigoid, alopecia areata, and Netherton syndrome, as wellas respiratory diseases, such as allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, chronic eosinophilic pneumonia, and allergic rhinitis. In addition,eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders, particularly eosinophilic esophagitis, and food allergy, are also research fields of interest. Here, wereview published data and clinical trials examining the use of dupilumab in these disorders (AU)

Los recientes avances en la comprensión de la inflamación T2 han mostrado otras enfermedades en las que la inflamación T2 está involucrada.El dupilumab es un anticuerpo monoclonal recientemente desarrollado que bloquea la transmisión de señales de IL-4 e IL-13, dos citocinasesenciales en la respuesta T2. Se están investigando posibles nuevas indicaciones, que incluyen enfermedades cutáneas, como el prurigonodular, eccema numular, dermatitis alérgica de contacto, eccema crónico de manos, urticaria crónica espontánea, penfigoide ampolloso,alopecia areata y síndrome de Netherton, así como enfermedades respiratorias, como la aspergilosis broncopulmonar alérgica, neumoníaeosinofílica crónica y rinitis alérgica. Además, las enfermedades gastrointestinales eosinofílicas, en particular la esofagitis eosinofílica y laalergia alimentaria, también constituyen áreas de investigación. En esta publicación se revisan los datos publicados y los ensayos clínicosque evalúan el uso de dupilumab en estas entidade

Esofagitis eosinofílica y acalasia esofágica / Eosinophilic esophagitis and esophageal acalasia

Introducción: La esofagitis eosinofílica es una enfermedad emergente, caracterizada por infiltración del esófago por leucocitos eosinófilos. Sus principales síntomas son la disfagia y las frecuentes impactaciones de alimento en el esófago. Actualmente existen evidencias científicas que reconocen la enfermedad como causa posible de evolución no favorable en pacientes después de miotomía de Héller. Objetivo: Describir las evidencias biomoleculares que asocian la esofagitis eosinofílica y la acalasia esofágica. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión sistemática y crítica de las evidencias sobre los mecanismos biomoleculares asociados a la esofagitis eosinofílica y la acalasia esofágica. Se consultaron artículos publicados entre 2015 y 2020 e indexados en las bases de datos PubMed, SciELO, LILACS y Scopus. Análisis e integración de la información: Se discute sobre cuestiones medulares que han sido publicadas recientemente respecto al tema en cuestión. ¿Pueden coexistir la esofagitis eosinofílica y la acalasia esofágica? ¿Influye la esofagitis eosinofílica en el resultado del tratamiento de la acalasia esofágica? ¿Qué investigaciones serían necesarias para establecer la relación entre las dos enfermedades? Conclusiones: Los mecanismos celulares y biomoleculares desencadenados por la infiltración eosinofílica contextualizan la diferencia etiológica y fisiopatológica de la esofagitis eosinofílica y la acalasia esofágica, lo cual sustenta la evolución desfavorable posmiotomía de los pacientes y motiva la realización de estudios prospectivos y controlados con el fin de ofrecer una mejor calidad de vida(AU)

Introduction: Eosinophilic esophagitis is an emerging disease characterized by infiltration of the esophagus by eosinophilic leukocytes. Its main symptoms are dysphagia and frequent food impaction in the esophagus. Scientific evidence is now available that recognizes the disease as the possible cause of unfavorable evolution in patients undergoing Heller myotomy. Objective: Describe the biomolecular evidence associating eosinophilic esophagitis to esophageal achalasia. Methods: A systematic critical review was conducted of the evidence about biomolecular mechanisms associated to eosinophilic esophagitis and esophageal achalasia. The articles consulted were published in the databases PubMed, SciELO, LILACS and Scopus from 2015 to 2020. Data analysis and integration: A discussion is provided about crucial questions published recently concerning the study topic: Can eosinophilic esophagitis and esophageal achalasia coexist? Does eosinophilic esophagitis influence the result of esophageal achalasia treatment? What studies are required to establish the relationship between the two conditions? Conclusions: The cellular and biomolecular mechanisms triggered by eosonophilic infiltration contextualize the etiological and pathophysiological difference between eosinophilic esophagitis and esophageal achalasia. This explains the unfavorable post-myotomy evolution of patients and encourages the conduct of prospective controlled studies aimed at enhancing quality of life(AU)

A meta-analysis of efficacy of topical steroids in eosinophilic esophagitis: From the perspective of histologic, clinical, and endoscopic outcome / Un metaanálisis de eficacia de los esteroides tópicos en la esofagitis eosinofílica desde la perspectiva del resultado histológico, clínico y endoscópico

Background: Swallowed topical steroids are a mainstay drug therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), studies have demonstrated good histologic response, but with enormous discrepancy in clinical and endoscopic improvement. We conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of topical steroids in EoE in histological, clinical and endoscopic improvement. Methods: Several databases were searched from inception to August 1, 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing topical steroids with placebo for EoE in the short-term. The outcomes of interest mainly included basic characteristics of the studies, histologic, clinical, endoscopic response rate and adverse events. The results were pooled together using Reviewer Manager 5.3.5 software, and inconsistency was quantified using I2 statistics. Results: Nine studies were eventually selected. The results showed that topical steroids were effective in inducing histologic response compared with placebo for both complete (OR 35.82, 95% CI 14.98–85.64, P<0.0001; I2=0, P=0.72) and partial response (OR 28.44, 95% CI 8.56–94.47, P<0.0001; I2=70%, P=0.0009). Moreover, topical steroids were useful in gaining clinical response (OR 2.53, 95% CI 1.14–5.60, P=0.02; I2=60%, P=0.02) and endoscopic response (OR 3.51, 95% CI 1.47–8.36, P=0.005; I2=0, P=0.57). Generally, topical steroids are well tolerated. The most common adverse events are infections and infestations (59 cases). Conclusion: Topical steroids were effective in inducing histological, clinical and endoscopic response in the short-term, and the adverse events were almost tolerable; however, we should interpret the result of clinical and endoscopic response with caution.(AU)

Antecedentes: Los esteroides tópicos tragados son una terapia farmacológica principal de la esofagitis eosinofílica (EoE). Algunos estudios han demostrado una buena respuesta histológica, aunque con gran discrepancia en la mejora clínica y endoscópica. Hemos realizado este metaanálisis para investigar la eficacia de los esteroides tópicos en EoE en la mejora histológica, clínica y endoscópica. Métodos: Se buscaron varias bases de datos desde el inicio hasta el 1 de agosto de 2019 para ensayos controlados aleatorios comparando esteroides tópicos con placebo para EoE a corto plazo. Los resultados de interés incluyeron principalmente características básicas de los estudios, histológicas, clínicas, tasa de respuesta endoscópica y eventos adversos. Los resultados se agruparon mediante el software de Reviewer Manager 5.3.5, y la incoherencia se cuantificó mediante estadísticas I2. Resultados: Nueve estudios fueron finalmente seleccionados. Los resultados mostraron que los esteroides tópicos fueron eficaces en la inducción de la respuesta histológica en comparación con placebo tanto para la respuesta completa (OR 35,82; IC 95%: 14,98-85,64; p<0,0001; I2 0, p=0,72) como para la parcial (OR 28,44; IC 95%: 8,56-94,47; p<0,0001; I2 70%, p=0,0009). Los esteroides tópicos también fueron útiles en la obtención de respuesta clínica (OR 2,53; IC 95%: 1,14-5,60; p=0,02; I2 60%; p=0,02) y respuesta endoscópica (OR 3,51; IC 95%: 1,47-8,36; p=0,005; I2 0; p=0,57). Los esteroides tópicos suelen ser bien tolerados. Los acontecimientos adversos más frecuentes son infecciones e infestaciones (59 casos). Conclusión: Los esteroides tópicos fueron eficaces en la inducción de la respuesta histológica, clínica y endoscópica a corto plazo, y los eventos adversos fueron tolerables; sin embargo, debemos interpretar con precaución el resultado de la respuesta clínica y endoscópica.(AU)

A meta-analysis of efficacy of topical steroids in eosinophilic esophagitis: From the perspective of histologic, clinical, and endoscopic outcome.

BACKGROUND: Swallowed topical steroids are a mainstay drug therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), studies have demonstrated good histologic response, but with enormous discrepancy in clinical and endoscopic improvement. We conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of topical steroids in EoE in histological, clinical and endoscopic improvement. METHODS: Several databases were searched from inception to August 1, 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing topical steroids with placebo for EoE in the short-term. The outcomes of interest mainly included basic characteristics of the studies, histologic, clinical, endoscopic response rate and adverse events. The results were pooled together using Reviewer Manager 5.3.5 software, and inconsistency was quantified using I2 statistics. RESULTS: Nine studies were eventually selected. The results showed that topical steroids were effective in inducing histologic response compared with placebo for both complete (OR 35.82, 95% CI 14.98-85.64, P<0.0001; I2=0, P=0.72) and partial response (OR 28.44, 95% CI 8.56-94.47, P<0.0001; I2=70%, P=0.0009). Moreover, topical steroids were useful in gaining clinical response (OR 2.53, 95% CI 1.14-5.60, P=0.02; I2=60%, P=0.02) and endoscopic response (OR 3.51, 95% CI 1.47-8.36, P=0.005; I2=0, P=0.57). Generally, topical steroids are well tolerated. The most common adverse events are infections and infestations (59 cases). CONCLUSION: Topical steroids were effective in inducing histological, clinical and endoscopic response in the short-term, and the adverse events were almost tolerable; however, we should interpret the result of clinical and endoscopic response with caution.

[Recommendations for the diagnosis and practical management of paediatric eosinophilic oesophagitis]. / Recomendaciones para el diagnóstico y manejo práctico de la esofagitis eosinofílica pediátrica.

Eosinophilic oesophagitis is an emerging and chronic disorder mediated by the immune system, and is characterised by symptoms of oesophageal dysfunction and inflammation with isolated eosinophil infiltration in the oesophagus. It is more common in males and in atopic subjects, and the symptoms vary with age. In younger children, there is vomiting, abdominal pain and dietary problems, with dysphagia and food impaction in older children and adolescents. The diagnosis is based on the presence of symptoms and oesophageal inflammation with ≥ 15 eosinophils / high power field, and after ruling out other causes of oesophageal eosinophilia. Without treatment, the disease usually persists and can progress to fibrostenotic forms more common in adults. The treatment options included proton pump inhibitors, empirical elimination diets, and swallowed topical corticosteroids. Maintenance therapy is advisable after the induction treatment. Diet is the only treatment that is directed at the cause of the disease, on identifying the triggering food or foods. The response to the treatments requires a histological assessment due to the poor agreement between the symptoms and the oesophageal inflammation. The practical management of Eosinophilic oesophagitis presents with challenges, due to, among other causes, the current lack of availability of specific drugs, and to its approach with, occasionally complex, diet treatments. The present document, prepared by the Working Group on Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders of the Spanish Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, has as its objective to help in the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to paediatric eosinophilic oesophagitis, based on the recent evidence-based consensus guidelines.

[Transcultural adaptation of the Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Quality of Life Module Questionnaire]. / Adaptación transcultural del cuestionario Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Quality of Life Module.

INTRODUCTION: Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) affects the quality of life (QoL) of the patients and their families. Specific quality of life questionnaires help to evaluate the QoL for this particular disease, as well as to make diagnostic or therapeutic changes in order to improve it. OBJECTIVE: To make a transcultural adaptation of the original English version of the Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Quality of Life Module (Peds QL EoE Module) into the Spanish language. METHODS: The PedsQL EoE Module questionnaire consists of 3 versions for parents and children from 5-7, 8-12, and 13-18 years, and one for parents of children from 2-4 years. It follows the international consensus methodology, consisting of performing independent translations of the original English version to Spanish, a consensus Spanish version, a back-translation into English, preliminary final version, as well as a cognitive interview with 5 parents and children of each age group in order to evaluate the comprehension of the questionnaire, and once the difficulties found are resolved, the final version. RESULTS: In the cognitive interview, 15 children and 20 parents responded to all the questions. The time taken to complete the questionnaire seemed adequate to them, and the comprehension test was easy. The 5 to 7 years children group took the longest in responding and that had more difficulty in understanding it. The overall satisfaction was high, and the questionnaire seemed to be a useful tool for them. CONCLUSIONS: After it validation, the transcultural adaptation to Spanish of the Peds QL EoE Module questionnaire can be applied in order to study the QoL of Spanish children with EoE.

Esofagitis eosinofílica: reporte de un caso / A case report of eosinophilic esophagitis

Resumen Objetivo: presentar un caso infrecuente de un paciente con esofagitis eosinofílica, el cual constituye el primer caso reportado en nuestro país en 53 años. Caso clínico: paciente de 28 años, género femenino, de raza blanca, con antecedentes personales de atopia, rinitis alérgica, dermatitis, diarreas ocasionales y asma, por la cual ha estado ingresada en varias ocasiones; además presenta antecedentes familiares de asma bronquial. Refiere que estas alteraciones comenzaron a los 17 años, y desde allí fue asistida por varios especialistas. Hace 10 meses presentó disfagia, la cual fue en aumento, dolor torácico y abdominal, pirosis y pérdida de peso. En el examen físico presentó sibilancias diseminadas en ambos campos pulmonares. El estudio analítico completo y los exámenes imagenológicos resultaron normales. La endoscopia y la biopsia esofágica mostraron los elementos compatibles con esofagitis eosinofílica. El tratamiento se realizó con esteroides orales, monteleukast e inhibidores de la bomba de protones, que mostraron resultados excelentes. Conclusiones: la esofagitis eosinofílica es una enfermedad de la que todavía existe un gran desconocimiento. Es más común en niños, hombres jóvenes de raza blanca, y la cual, por lo regular, tiene un componente atópico marcado. En la adultez se manifiesta por disfagia e impactación de los alimentos. Para el diagnóstico de una esofagitis eosinofílica tiene que haber síntomas de disfunción esofágica, más de 15 eosinófilos por campo, falta de respuesta a los inhibidores de la bomba de protones y exclusión del reflujo gastroesofágico. Dependiendo de cada caso, el paciente debe ser tratado de forma multidisciplinaria por gastroenterólogos, alergólogos, inmunólogos y nutriólogos.

Abstract Objective: We present the first case of eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) reported in our country in fifty-three years. Clinical Case: The patient was 28-year-old white woman with a personal history of atopy, allergic rhinitis, dermatitis and occasional diarrhea and asthma. She had relatives with bronchial asthma and had been admitted to hospitals several times previously. According to the patient, these alterations began at age 17, and she had seen several specialists since that time. Ten months prior to this admission, increasingly severe dysphagia accompanied by chest and abdominal pain, heartburn and weight loss began. Upon physical examination, wheezing was evident in both lung fields. The complete analytical study and imaging tests were all normal. Endoscopy and esophageal biopsy showed elements compatible with eosinophilic esophagitis. Excellent results were obtained from treatment with oral steroids, montelukast and proton pump inhibitors. Conclusions: EE is still poorly understood. It is more common in children and young white men, and there is usually a marked atopic component. In adulthood it is manifested by dysphagia and impaction of food. To diagnose EE there must be symptoms of esophageal dysfunction, more than 15 eosinophils per field, lack of response to proton pump inhibitors and exclusion of gastroesophageal reflux. Depending on the case, patients may require multidisciplinary treatment by gastroenterologists, allergists, immunologists and nutritionists.