Evaluation of the Sensititre YeastOne and Etest in Comparison with CLSI M38-A2 for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Three Azoles, Amphotericin B, Caspofungin, and Anidulafungin, against Aspergillusfumigatus and Other Species, Using New Clinical Breakpoints and Epidemiological Cutoff Values.

Aspergillosis is an invasive fungal disease associated with high mortality. Antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) is receiving increasing consideration for managing patients, as well as for surveilling emerging drug resistance, despite having time-consuming and technically complex reference methodologies. The Sensititre YeastOne (SYO) and Etest methods are widely utilized for yeasts but have not been extensively evaluated for Aspergillus isolates. We obtained Posaconazole (POS), Voriconazole (VCZ), Itraconazole (ITC), Amphotericin B (AMB), Caspofungin (CAS), and Anidulafungin (AND) minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for both the Etest (n = 330) and SYO (n = 339) methods for 106 sequenced clinical strains. For 84 A. fumigatus, we analyzed the performance of both commercial methods in comparison with the CLSI-AFST, using available cutoff values. An excellent correlation could be demonstrated for Etest-AMB and Etest-VCZ (p < 0.01). SYO-MICs of AMB, VCZ, and POS resulted in excellent essential agreement (>93%), and >80% for AMB, VCZ, and ITC Etest-MICs. High categoric agreement was found for AMB, ITC, and CAS Etest-MICs (>85%) and AMB SYO-MICs (>90%). The considerable number of major/very major errors found using Etest and SYO, possibly related to the proposed cutoffs and associated with the less time-consuming processes, support the need for the improvement of commercial methods for Aspergillus strains.

Head-to-head comparison of CLSI, EUCAST, Etest and VITEK®2 results for Candida auris susceptibility testing.

The susceptibility of 31 Candida auris clinical isolates was evaluated by four methods, namely the microdilution reference method according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines as well as Etest and VITEK®2. Essential agreement between the two reference methods was 90%. Etest showed a better overall agreement with the reference methods (94% and 81% for CLSI and EUCAST, respectively) than VITEK®2 (70% and 72%, respectively). Discrepancies were found for fluconazole (FLC) and amphotericin B. Considering categorical agreement (CDC tentative breakpoints), the majority of isolates were considered FLC-resistant (93.6% and 80.6% by CLSI and EUCAST, respectively). Furthermore, all isolates were considered susceptible to echinocandins by all methods. Susceptibility results should be interpreted with care if the VITEK®2 system is used to guide therapeutic decisions for C. auris infections.

Minimum inhibitory concentrations and resistance for selected antimicrobial agents (including imipenem, linezolid and tigecycline) of bacteria obtained from eye infections.

Objective: To determine bacteria obtained from eye infections, both resistance and minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) to gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, tigecycline, linezolid and imipenem, in vitro. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was undergone with 50 samples from 50 eyes of patients diagnosed with keratitis or endophthalmitis, who came to a consultation at the Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander (Floridablanca, Colombia) from August to November 2014. The MICs of the isolated microorganisms were established through Etest® strips (BioMérieux SA, Marcy-l'Etoile - France). Results: Of the 50 samples in total, 17 different bacteria species or groups were isolated. The main isolate for gram-positives was Methicillin Resistant Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus (17 samples), and for gram-negatives was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (6 samples). The susceptibility percentages sorted from highest to lowest for gram-positive isolates (n=38) were: imipenem 90.3%, linezolid 87.9%, tigecycline 78.1%, gatifloxacin 68.8% and moxifloxacin 68.8%. For gram-negative isolates (n=12), they were: imipenem 72.7%, gatifloxacin 70%, moxifloxacin 66.7% (no reference cut-off points were found for Pseudomonas aeruginosa), tigecycline 22.2%, and linezolid 0% (as expected according to its inhibition spectrum). Conclusions: Although fourth generation fluoroquinolones are currently the preferred initial empirical monotherapy in our practice, given the increasing bacterial resistance, in cases in which gram-positive bacteria were isolated in the initial staining imipenem, linezolid or tigecycline could be used as an alternative. On the other hand, for cases of gram-negative bacteria, no antimicrobial susceptibility exceeded 80%, so using two antimicrobials looking for a synergy between them could be a better option. Abbreviations: S = Susceptibility, IS = Intermediate susceptibility, R = Resistance.

Bacteriemia por Staphylococcus aureus con sensibilidad disminuida heterogénea a vancomicina: reporte de un caso / Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia with heterogeneous intermediate-level vancomycin resistance: a case report

Staphylococcus aureusmeticilina-resistente (SAMR)es una causa frecuente de bacteriemias intrahospitalarias. Para su tratamiento se utiliza vancomicina y han emergido cepas con sensibilidad disminuida heterogénea (h-VISA) que albergan subpoblaciones con sensibi-lidad reducida a vancomicina. Se comunica un caso de bacteriemia intra-tratamiento con vancomicina por SAMR h-VISA. El aislamiento muestra sensibilidad a vancomicina (CIMvan: 1 µg/mL), sin embargo E-test GRD sugiere h-VISA (CIMvan: 2 µg/mL y CIMtei: 8 µg/mL). El análisis del perfil poblacional - área bajo la curva (PAP-AUC) valida este hallazgo. Se rota a linezolid con resolución clínica.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (SAMR) is a common cause of nosocomial bacteremia. Vancomycin, a glycopeptide, is widely employed for the therapy of SAMR infections. In recent years, heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate strains (h-VISA) have emerged. We report a case of intra-treatment bacteremia caused by SAMR h-VISA. The isolate shows susceptibility to vancomycin (MICvan: 1 µg/mL). But the GRD E-test suggests h-VISA (MICvan: 2 µg/mL and MICtei: 8 µg/mL). The population analysis profile - area under the curve (PAP-AUC) validates SAMR h-VISA. Rotation of antibiotic therapy with linezolid is done, with good clinical outcome.

Beta-lactams susceptibility testing of penicillin-resistant, ampicillin-susceptible Enterococcus faecalis isolates: a comparative assessment of Etest and disk diffusion methods against broth dilution.

This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of disk diffusion and Etest methods, compared to that of the broth dilution reference method for identifying beta-lactam susceptibilities of Penicillin-Resistant, Ampicillin-Susceptible Enterococcus faecalis (PRASEF) isolates. Fifty-nine PRASEF and 15 Penicillin-Susceptible, Ampicillin-Susceptible E. faecalis (PSASEF) clinical nonrepetitive isolates were evaluated. The effectiveness of five beta-lactams (ampicillin, amoxicillin, imipenem, penicillin, and piperacillin) was tested. All antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed and interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Interpretative discrepancies, such as essential agreement, categorical agreement, and errors, were assessed. The acceptability was ≥ 90% for both categorical agreement and essential agreement. Etest proved to be an accurate method for testing beta-lactam susceptibilities of the emerging PRASEF isolates, disk diffusion presented poor performance, particularly for imipenem and piperacillin.

Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of Resistance to Macrolides and Lincosamides in Streptococcus agalactiae Isolated from Pregnant Women in Misiones, Argentina.

The aim of this work was to determine the susceptibility, molecular profile, and clonal relationship in Streptococcus agalactiae (group B Streptococcus [GBS]) isolated from vaginal-rectal swab samples. We worked with 200 isolates collected from pregnant women between 35 and 37 weeks of gestation. The macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLSB) resistance phenotypes were determined using the double-disc assay. Susceptibility to erythromycin (ERI) and clindamycin (CLI) was performed with the E-test. Resistance genes ermB and ermTR were detected by polymerase chain reaction. Clonal studies were performed using the random amplification of polymorphic DNA. Twelve (6%) of the isolates were resistant to ERI and 10 (5%) of them to CLI. Fifty percent of the resistant strains corresponded to serotype III, 25% to serotype V, and the remaining 25% to serotype Ia, II, and nontypeable strains. The cMLSB phenotype was detected in eight strains (66.67%) and the iMLSB phenotype in four (33.33%). The minimum inhibitory concentration values were between 1.5 and 16 µg/mL for ERI, and between 1 and 32 µg/mL for CLI. Out of the 25 strains susceptible to ERI and CLI, the presence of the ermB gene was detected in eight of them and the ermTR gene in one strain. The ermB gene was detected in the 12 strains that initially had some macrolide resistance phenotype. The ermTR gene was detected in three out of the four strains with the iMLSB phenotype. The resistance to macrolides in the province of Misiones is due to multiclonal spread. The phenotypic and genotypic characterization of macrolide resistance in GBS strains are crucial to contribute to the correct intrapartum prophylactic antibiotic therapy of allergic pregnant women and the epidemiological surveillance of these strains.

Assessment of rapid direct E-test on positive blood culture for same-day antimicrobial susceptibility.

INTRODUCTION: Early and appropriated antimicrobial therapy showed to positively impact on the clinical improvement of septic patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate E-test methodology to obtain rapid results of antimicrobial susceptibility, starting directly from blood culture bottles positive to Gram-negative monomicrobial flora. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and five blood culture samples positive to Gram-negative rods at the microscopic examination were collected. Bacterial identification from early subculture on blood agar after 4 h incubation and rapid direct E-test from blood culture broth were performed on every sample. Antibiotics MIC were achieved after 5-6 h of incubation. Resulting MIC values were compared with those obtained with reference E-test from the overnight subculture. Categorical agreement (CA) and essential agreement (EA) were evaluated. RESULTS: Comparison between rapid direct E-test and reference E-test showed CA ranging from 95.1 to 100 % and 88.2 to 100 % for Enterobacteriaceae (EB) and for non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli, respectively. Rapid direct E-test showed an overall EA of 80.1 %, revealing different EA rates for the tested antibiotics. Among carbapenemase-producing EB, CA of 87.5 % and EA of 75.5 % for MP were achieved. DISCUSSION: The same-day communication of the antimicrobial susceptibility represents an important challenge in the multidrug-resistance era. Despite not being able to anticipate actual MIC values, the rapid direct E-test may be useful to obtain preliminary AST results in 5-6 h, especially if used in association with phenotypic or genotypic tests to identify the main resistance mechanisms.

A Multicenter Study To Evaluate Ceftaroline Breakpoints: Performance in an Area with High Prevalence of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Sequence Type 5 Lineage.

Ceftaroline (CPT) is a broad-spectrum agent with potent activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The sequence type 5 (ST5) Chilean-Cordobés clone, associated with CPT nonsusceptibility, is dominant in Chile, a region with high rates of MRSA infections. Here, we assessed the in vitro activity of CPT against a collection of MRSA isolates collected between 1999 and 2018 from nine hospitals (n = 320) and community settings (n = 41) in Santiago, Chile, and evaluated performance across testing methodologies. We found that our hospital-associated isolates exhibited higher CPT MIC distributions (MIC50 and MIC90 of 2 mg/liter) than the community isolates (MIC50 and MIC90 of 0.5 mg/liter), a finding that was consistent across time and independent of the culture source. High proportions (64%) of isolates were CPT nonsusceptible despite the absence of CPT use in Chile. Across methodologies, the Etest underestimated the MIC relative to the gold standard broth microdilution (BMD) test (MIC50 and MIC90 of 1 and 1.5 mg/liter, respectively). There was low (∼51%) categorical agreement (CA) between Etest and BMD results across CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints. The recent revision of CLSI guidelines abolished "very major error" (VME) from the previous guidelines (81%), which perform similarly to the EUCAST guidelines. The level of concordance between CLSI and EUCAST for BMD testing and Etest was >95%. Disk diffusion performed poorly relative to BMD under CLSI (CA, 55%) and EUCAST (CA, 36%) guidelines. Comparison of EUCAST to CLSI for disk diffusion (with EUCAST used as the reference) showed low agreement (CA, 25%; VME, 70%). In summary, CPT-nonsusceptible MRSA are dominant in clinical settings in Chile. Our results provide data to support the reevaluation of CPT breakpoints and to improve agreement across methodologies and agencies.

Comparison Between Etest and Broth Microdilution Methods for Testing Itraconazole-Resistant Aspergillus fumigatus Susceptibility to Antifungal Combinations.

The checkerboard broth microdilution assay (BMD) is the most frequently used method for the in vitro evaluation of drug combinations. However, its use to evaluate the effect of antifungal drugs on filamentous fungi is sometimes associated with endpoint-reading difficulties, and different degrees of interaction are assigned to the same drug combination. We evaluated combinations of the azoles, itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole, with the echinocandins, anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin, against 15 itraconazole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus clinical strains via the checkerboard BMD and Etest assay. Readings after 24 and 48 h, considering the two reading endpoints, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum effective concentration (MEC), were performed for both methods. Our results showed that the correlation coefficients between the BMD and Etest methods were quite diverse to the drug combinations tested. The highest correlation coefficients of the Etest with the BMD assays (MEC and MIC reading) were the Etest-MIC reading at 24 h and the Etest-MEC reading at 48 h. Improvements in experimental conditions may increase the correlation between the two methods and ensure that Etest assay can be safely used in the evaluation of antifungal combinations against Aspergillus species.

Sensibilidad a los antimicrobianos de aislamientos de Helicobacter pylori aislados de lesiones gástricas / Antimicrobial susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori strains isolated from gastric lesions

Se evaluó la sensibilidad a los antimicrobianos de 30 aislamientos de Helicobacter pylori aislados de biopsias gástricas mediante los métodos de difusión por discos y tiras de E-test. Los antimicrobianos evaluados fueron amoxicilina, claritromicina, metronidazol y ciprofloxacina. No se encontraron cepas resistentes a amoxicilina, el 17% (5/30) fueron resistentes a claritromicina, el 20% (6/30) a ciprofloxacina por ambos métodos, y el 37% (11/30) a metronidazol por E-test. Si bien el número de cepas estudiadas fue reducido, hubo una sola discrepancia en la interpretación de la sensibilidad cuando se compararon ambos métodos: el metronidazol fue categorizado como sensible por E-test e intermedio por el método de difusión por discos. No pudo determinarse una asociación estadísticamente significativa entre el tipo de lesión histológica y el patrón de resistencia encontrado.

Antimicrobial susceptibility was evaluated by two diffusion methods: E-test strips to determine minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and disk diffusion for amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole and ciprofloxacin in 30 Helicobacter pylori strains isolated from gastric biopsies. No strains were resistant to amoxicillin, 17% (5/30) were resistant to clarithromycin, 20% (6/30) ciprofloxacin by both methods, and 37% (11/30) to metronidazole by the E-test. Although the number of strains studied was reduced, there was a single mismatch in interpreting susceptibility when both methods were compared; the same mismatch was observed for metronidazole, being categorized as sensitive by the E-test and as intermediate by disk diffusion. No association between the histological type of lesion and the resistance pattern found could be determined.

[Antimicrobial susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori strains isolated from gastric lesions]. / Sensibilidad a los antimicrobianos de aislamientos de Helicobacter pylori aislados de lesiones gástricas.

Antimicrobial susceptibility was evaluated by two diffusion methods: E-test strips to determine minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and disk diffusion for amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole and ciprofloxacin in 30 Helicobacter pylori strains isolated from gastric biopsies. No strains were resistant to amoxicillin, 17% (5/30) were resistant to clarithromycin, 20% (6/30) ciprofloxacin by both methods, and 37% (11/30) to metronidazole by the E-test. Although the number of strains studied was reduced, there was a single mismatch in interpreting susceptibility when both methods were compared; the same mismatch was observed for metronidazole, being categorized as sensitive by the E-test and as intermediate by disk diffusion. No association between the histological type of lesion and the resistance pattern found could be determined.

Characterisation of penicillin and tetracycline resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine milk samples in Minas Gerais, Brazil.

This Regional Research Communication describes the characterisation of ampicillin, penicillin and tetracycline resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine subclinical mastitis in Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Ninety S. aureus isolates from bovine mastitis exhibiting phenotypic resistance to ampicillin, penicillin and/or tetracycline were selected for this study. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of each antibiotic was determined using the E-Test® and the production of beta-lactamase was determined by cefinase disks. The resistance genes blaZ, tet(K), tet(L), tet(M), and tet(O) were investigated by PCR in all of the isolates. The MIC results classified 77, 83 and 71% of the isolates as resistant to ampicillin, penicillin and tetracycline, respectively. The MIC50 and MIC90 were, respectively, 1 and 2 µg/ml for ampicillin, 0·5 and 1 µg/ml for penicillin and 32 and 64 µg/ml for tetracycline. Eighty-six per cent of beta-lactamase producing isolates were detected. Of the 90 isolates investigated, 97% amplified blaZ, 84% amplified tet(K), 9% amplified tet(L), 2% amplified tet(M) and 1% amplified tet(O). Seventy-nine isolates (88%) showed blaZ together with at least one tet gene. S. aureus isolates showed high MIC50 and MIC90 values for the three antimicrobials. The blaZ and tet(K) genes were widespread in the herds studied, and most of the isolates harboured blaZ and tet(K) concomitantly.

[In vitro antifungal activity of azoles and amphotericin B against Malassezia furfur by the CLSI M27-A3 microdilution and Etest® methods]. / Actividad antifúngica in vitro de azoles y anfotericina B frente a Malassezia furfur por el método de microdilución M27-A3 del CLSI y Etest®.

BACKGROUND: Malassezia furfur is a human skin commensal yeast that can cause skin and opportunistic systemic infections. Given its lipid dependant status, the reference methods established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) to evaluate antifungal susceptibility in yeasts are not applicable. AIMS: To evaluate the in vitro susceptibility of M. furfur isolates from infections in humans to antifungals of clinical use. METHODS: The susceptibility profile to amphotericin B, itraconazole, ketoconazole and voriconazole of 20 isolates of M. furfur, using the broth microdilution method (CLSI M27-A3) and Etest®, was evaluated. RESULTS: Itraconazole and voriconazole had the highest antifungal activity against the isolates tested. The essential agreement between the two methods for azoles antifungal activity was in the region of 60-85% and the categorical agreement was around 70-80%, while the essential and categorical agreement for amphotericin B was 10%. CONCLUSIONS: The azoles were the compounds that showed the highest antifungal activity against M. furfur, as determined by the two techniques used; however more studies need to be performed to support that Etest® is a reliable method before its implementation as a routine clinical laboratory test.

Invasive Infections with Multidrug-Resistant Yeast Candida auris, Colombia.

Candida auris is an emerging multidrug-resistant fungus that causes a wide range of symptoms. We report finding 17 cases of C. auris infection that were originally misclassified but correctly identified 27.5 days later on average. Patients with a delayed diagnosis of C. auris had a 30-day mortality rate of 35.2%.

Antifungal Susceptibility In Vitro Determined by the Etest(r) for Candida Obtained from the Oral Cavity of Irradiated and Elderly Individuals

This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro antifungal susceptibility of Candida species of head-and-neck-irradiated patients (Group 1), non-institutionalized (Group 2) and institutionalized elders (Group 3) using Etest(r) methodology. Candida was isolated from saliva and presumptively identified by CHROMagar Candida(r), confirmed by morphological criteria, carbohydrate assimilation (API 20C AUX(r)) and genetic typing (OPE 18). The collection was made from 29, 34 and 29 individuals (Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively) with 67 isolates. Etest(r) strips (ketoconazole, itraconazole, fluconazole, amphotericin B and flucytosine) on RPMI (Roswell Park Memorial Institute) agar, on duplicate, were used to evaluate susceptibility. ATTC (American Type Culture Collection) 10231 (Candida albicans) was used as quality control. Among the 67 isolates of Candida species, most were susceptible to azoles, flucytosine and amphotericin B. None of the isolates showed resistance and dose-dependent susceptibility to amphotericin B. There were nine strains resistant to itraconazole, six to fluconazole and two to ketoconazole and ten dose-dependent, mainly to flucytocine. The highest MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) to C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis was 2.671 μg.mL-1, 8.104 μg.mL-1, 4.429 μg.mL-1, all for flucytosine. C. krusei and C. glabrata were associated with higher MIC for azoles and C. glabrata with higher MIC to flucytosine. In summary, susceptibility to all tested antifungal agents was evident. The isolates were more resistant to itraconazole and dose-dependent to flucytosine. A comparison of C. albicans in the three groups showed no outliers. Higher MIC was associated with C. krusei and C. glabrata.

Esse estudo objetivou avaliar a susceptibilidade antifúngica in vitro de espécies de Candida obtidas de pacientes irradiados em cabeça e pescoço (Grupo 1), idosos não institucionalizados (Grupo 2) e idosos institucionalizados (Grupo 3) usando a metodologia Etest(r). Candida foi isolada da saliva e identificada presuntivamente pelo teste CHROMagar Candida(r), confirmada pelo critério morfológico, assimilação de carboidratos API 20C AUX(r) e identificação genética (OPE 18). A coleta foi feita em 29, 34 e 29 indivíduos (Grupos 1, 2 and 3, respectivamente) com 67 isolados. As fitas de Etest(r) (cetoconazol, itraconazol, fluconazol, anfotericina B and flucitosina) em meio ágar RPMI (Roswell Park Memorial Institute), em duplicata, foram utilizados para avaliar a susceptibilidade. A ATTC (American Type Culture Collection) 10231 (Candida albicans) foi usada como controle de qualidade. Dos 67 isolados de espécies de Candida, a maioria foi susceptíveis aos azoles, flucitosina e anfotericina B. Nenhum dos isolados mostrou resistência ou susceptibilidade dose-dependente a anfotericina B. Houve nove espécies resistentes ao itraconazol, seis ao fluconazol e duas ao cetoconazol e dez dose-dependentes, principalmente a flucitosina. Os maiores valores de MIC (mínima concentração inibitória) para C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis foram, respectivamente, 2,671 μg.mL-1, 8,104 μg.mL-1, 4, 429 μg.mL-1, todos para a flucitosina. C. krusei e C. glabrata foram associadas a um maior MIC para azoles e C. glabrata com maior MIC para flucitosina. Em resumo, a susceptibilidade a todos os antifúngicos testados foi evidente. Os isolados foram mais resistentes ao itraconazol e dose dependentes para a flucitosina. A comparação para C. albicans nos três grupos não mostrou diferença. Os maiores valores de MIC estavam relacionados a C. krusei e C. glabrata.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Helicobacter pylori isolates from Brazilian children and adolescents: comparing agar dilution, E-test, and disk diffusion

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Helicobacter pylori is increasingly important due to resistance to the most used antimicrobials agents. Only agar dilution method is approved by CLSI, but it is difficult to perform routinely. We evaluated the reliability of E-test and disk diffusion comparing to agar dilution method on Helicobacter pylori antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Susceptibility testing was performed for amoxicillin, clarithromycin, furazolidone, metronidazole and tetracycline using E-test, disk-diffusion and agar dilution method in 77 consecutive Helicobacter pylori strains from dyspeptic children and adolescents. Resistance rates were: amoxicillin - 10.4%, 9% and 68.8%; clarithromycin - 19.5%, 20.8%, 36.3%; metronidazole - 40.2%33.7%, 38.9%, respectively by agar dilution, E-test and disk diffusion method. Furazolidone and tetracycline showed no resistance rates. Metronidazole presented strong correlation to E-test (r = 0.7992, p < 0.0001) and disk diffusion method (r=-0.6962, p < 0.0001). Clarithromycin presented moderate correlation to E-test (r = 0.6369, p < 0.0001) and disk diffusion method (r=-0.5656, p < 0.0001). Amoxicillin presented weak correlation to E-test (r = 0.3565, p = 0.0015) and disk diffusion (r=-0.3565, p = 0.0015). Tetracycline presented weak correlation with E-test (r = 0.2346, p = 0.04) and furazolidone to disk diffusion (r=-0.0288, p = 0.8038). E-test presented better agreement with gold standard. It is an easy and reliable method for Helicobacter pylori susceptibility testing. Disk diffusion method presented high disagreement and high rates of major errors.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Helicobacter pylori isolates from Brazilian children and adolescents: comparing agar dilution, E-test, and disk diffusion

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Helicobacter pylori is increasingly important due to resistance to the most used antimicrobials agents. Only agar dilution method is approved by CLSI, but it is difficult to perform routinely. We evaluated the reliability of E-test and disk diffusion comparing to agar dilution method on Helicobacter pylori antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Susceptibility testing was performed for amoxicillin, clarithromycin, furazolidone, metronidazole and tetracycline using E-test, disk-diffusion and agar dilution method in 77 consecutive Helicobacter pylori strains from dyspeptic children and adolescents. Resistance rates were: amoxicillin - 10.4%, 9% and 68.8%; clarithromycin - 19.5%, 20.8%, 36.3%; metronidazole - 40.2%33.7%, 38.9%, respectively by agar dilution, E-test and disk diffusion method. Furazolidone and tetracycline showed no resistance rates. Metronidazole presented strong correlation to E-test (r = 0.7992, p < 0.0001) and disk diffusion method (r=-0.6962, p < 0.0001). Clarithromycin presented moderate correlation to E-test (r = 0.6369, p < 0.0001) and disk diffusion method (r=-0.5656, p < 0.0001). Amoxicillin presented weak correlation to E-test (r = 0.3565, p = 0.0015) and disk diffusion (r=-0.3565, p = 0.0015). Tetracycline presented weak correlation with E-test (r = 0.2346, p = 0.04) and furazolidone to disk diffusion (r=-0.0288, p = 0.8038). E-test presented better agreement with gold standard. It is an easy and reliable method for Helicobacter pylori susceptibility testing. Disk diffusion method presented high disagreement and high rates of major errors.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Helicobacter pylori isolates from Brazilian children and adolescents: comparing agar dilution, E-test, and disk diffusion.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Helicobacter pylori is increasingly important due to resistance to the most used antimicrobials agents. Only agar dilution method is approved by CLSI, but it is difficult to perform routinely. We evaluated the reliability of E-test and disk diffusion comparing to agar dilution method on Helicobacter pylori antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Susceptibility testing was performed for amoxicillin, clarithromycin, furazolidone, metronidazole and tetracycline using E-test, disk-diffusion and agar dilution method in 77 consecutive Helicobacter pylori strains from dyspeptic children and adolescents. Resistance rates were: amoxicillin - 10.4%, 9% and 68.8%; clarithromycin - 19.5%, 20.8%, 36.3%; metronidazole - 40.2%33.7%, 38.9%, respectively by agar dilution, E-test and disk diffusion method. Furazolidone and tetracycline showed no resistance rates. Metronidazole presented strong correlation to E-test (r = 0.7992, p < 0.0001) and disk diffusion method (r=-0.6962, p < 0.0001). Clarithromycin presented moderate correlation to E-test (r = 0.6369, p < 0.0001) and disk diffusion method (r=-0.5656, p < 0.0001). Amoxicillin presented weak correlation to E-test (r = 0.3565, p = 0.0015) and disk diffusion (r=-0.3565, p = 0.0015). Tetracycline presented weak correlation with E-test (r = 0.2346, p = 0.04) and furazolidone to disk diffusion (r=-0.0288, p = 0.8038). E-test presented better agreement with gold standard. It is an easy and reliable method for Helicobacter pylori susceptibility testing. Disk diffusion method presented high disagreement and high rates of major errors.

Antimicrobial susceptibility profile of brucella spp. isolated in Brazil

The intention of this work was to investigate the susceptibility profile of 27 Brucella strains isolated from animals in Brazil, using the E-test method with antimicrobials recommended for the treatment of human brucellosis, to monitor the activities of these antimicrobials and their potential efficacy for human brucellosis treatment. Efficiency of SE-AFLP in determining the genetic diversity of the species of Brucella and its correlation with their susceptibility profile was also evaluated. All 27 strains were susceptible to doxycycline. With the exception of one strain of B. canis and of B. abortus, all strains were susceptible to gentamicin and streptomycin. Of the wild Brucella strains tested, ten, nine and five showed reduced susceptibility to rifampicin, ceftriaxone and trimetoprim/sulfamethoxazole, respectively. One B. abortus and three B. canis strains showed multi-resistance profiles. The strain of B. abortus was resistant to streptomycin, rifampicin and ceftriaxone. Two strains of B. canis were resistant to rifampicin, ceftriaxone and trimetoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and one strain was resistant to rifampicin, ceftriaxone, streptomycin and gentamicin. Rifampicin, in combination with doxycycline, is one of the principal antibiotics prescribed to treat human brucellosis. The occurrence of strains resistant to rifampicin and other antimicrobials must be monitored before initiating this treatment, since the resistance of these strains could be one of the causes of the failure of some brucellosis treatment. No relationship was observed between SE-AFLP profiles and regional origin of the strains; neither between SE-AFLP profiles and antimicrobial profiles...

O objetivo deste trabalho foi investigar o perfil de susceptibilidade de 27 cepas de Brucella isoladas de animais no Brasil, utilizando-se o método E-test com os antimicrobianos recomendados para o tratamento da brucelose humana. Com este método, pretendeu-se monitorar a atividade destes antimicrobianos e seu potencial de eficacidade no tratamento desta enfermidade no homem. Também foi avaliada a eficiência da técnica SE-AFLP para discriminar as diferentes cepas de Brucella sp. e para analisar se os perfis gerados mostram alguma relação com os resultados de susceptibilidade. Todas as 27 cepas testadas foram sensíveis à doxiciclina, com exceção de uma cepa de B. canis e outra de B. abortus; as demais cepas foram sensíveis à gentamicina e à estreptomicina. Do total de cepas de campo testadas, respectivamente, dez, nove e cinco apresentaram susceptibilidade reduzida à rifampicina, ceftriaxona e trimetoprim/sulfametoxazol. Uma cepa de B. abortus e três de B. canis apresentaram perfil de multirresistência. A cepa de B. abortus mostrou-se resistente à estreptomicina, rifampicina e ceftriaxona. Duas cepas de B. canis foram resistentes à rifampicina, ceftriaxona e trimetoprim/sulfametoxazol e uma cepa foi resistente à rifampicina, ceftriaxona, streptomicina e gentamicina. Rifampicina e doxiciclina, associadas, são os principais antibióticos recomendados para o tratamento da brucelose humana. A ocorrência de cepas resistentes à rifampicina e outros antimicrobianos deve ser monitorada antes do início do tratamento, pois a resistência a esses antimicrobianos pode ser uma das causas do insucesso de alguns tratamentos de brucelose. Não foi observada nenhuma correlação entre os perfis SE- AFLP gerados e a origem das cepas, nem com os perfis de susceptibilidade destas cepas...

Validación del agar Mueller Hinton modificado para la determinación de las concentraciones mínimas inhibitorias a los antifúngicos por etest en candida spp / Validation of the modified Mueller Hinton agar for the determination of the minimum inhibitory concentrations to antifungals by E-test in Candida spp

En este trabajo de investigación se determinaron las Concentraciones Mínimas Inhibitorias (CMI) de los antifúngicos fluconazol, voriconazol, posaconazol, caspofungina, anidulafungina y anfotericina B, por los métodos de microdilución en caldo y difusión en agar con Etest, empleando RPMI 1640 agar y Mueller Hinton modificado (MHm), en 102 cepas de Candida spp., aisladas de sangre, provenientes de la Red de Candidemia del INHRR. El objetivo fue validar el empleo del MHm como medio de cultivo confiable en el método de Etest para la obtención de las CMI. Se utilizaron las cepas C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 y C. krusei ATCC 6258 como control de calidad. Los resultados demostraron un 94% de frecuencia para C. no albicans y un 6% para C. albicans. Se obtuvo un 100% de sensibilidad para las equinocandinas y anfotericina B, en todas las especies. El MHm demostró una elevada reproducibilidad con respecto al RPMI agar y el método de referencia microdilución en caldo. En base a los resultados obtenidos en esta investigación, se logró la validación del medio MHm para la determinación de las CMI por Etest, así como la detección de resistencia, recomendándolo como metodología confiable, accesible y de fácil ejecución para uso rutinario en el laboratorio de microbiología.

In this research, the Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) of the antifungal agent's fluconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, caspofungin, anidulafungin and amphotericin B were determined by broth microdilution and agar diffusion Etest methods, using RPMI 1640 agar and modified Mueller Hinton (mHM), in 102 strains of Candida spp., isolated from blood, from the Candidemia Network of the INHRR. The objective was to validate the use of mHM as a reliable culture medium for the Etest method to obtain MICs. As a quality control, the strains C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and C. krusei ATCC 6258 were used. The results demonstrated a 94% of frequency for non C. albicans and 6% for C. albicans. A 100% of sensitivity was obtained for echinocandins and amphotericin B in all species. The mHM showed high reproducibility with respect to RPMI agar and the reference method of microdilution broth. Based on the results obtained in this investigation, the validation of mHM medium, for the determination of MICs by Etest, as well as the resistance detection was achieved, recommending it as a reliable, affordable and easy to implement method for the routine use in the microbiology laboratory.