RESUMO
Résumé La sécurité des patients est devenue une priorité des politiques de santé publique. En 30 ans, les systèmes de santé se sont approprié les outils de gestion des risques conçus pour les industries. L'objectif de cette revue de littérature est de décrire les modèles et les démarches de sécurité actuellement déployés dans les systèmes de santé et d'explorer les nouvelles perspectives. La recherche bibliographique a été réalisée à partir de trois bases de données, en français et en anglais. L'analyse thématique du matériel retenu (48 références) a guidé la construction de l'article et l'identification d'une typologie de démarches de prévention. Après une présentation des démarches « classiques ¼, nous exposons les limites de ces démarches dans le contexte spécifique des soins. Puis nous présenterons les perspectives scientifiques actuellement envisagées pour construire de nouvelles approches de prévention en santé. Ces perspectives interrogent, en conclusion, la nécessité d'un changement de paradigme, comme le propose le courant de l'« ingénierie de la résilience ¼.
Abstract Patient security has become a priority in public health policies. In 30 years, health systems have adopted the risk management tools designed for industries. The purpose of this review of the literature is to describe the current security models and approaches deployed in health systems and to explore new perspectives. The bibliographic search was conducted from three databases, in French and in English. The thematic analysis of the selected material (48 references) guided the construction of the article and the identification of a typology of prevention approaches. After a presentation of the «classical¼ approaches, the limits of these approaches in the specific context of care are exposed. The scientific perspectives currently envisaged to build new approaches to prevention in health are then presented. By way of conclusion, these perspectives question the need for a paradigm shift, as proposed by the current of «resilience engineering¼.
Assuntos
Humanos , Gestão de Riscos/métodos , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Modelos Organizacionais , Política de SaúdeRESUMO
PRP is commonly used in sports medicine and because it is supposed to increase healing capacities of damaged tissues, it is expected to be increase efficiency or god clinical outcomes when added to arthroscopic surgical procedure. The current review of literature explores the evidence-based medicine supporting the use of PRP in three arthroscopic related disorders. Regarding cartilage lesions of the knee, many studies are exploring several aspect of cartilage lesion treatment. It appears that PRP, in some protocols with specific concentration, should be more efficient than current therapies in the treatment of early stages of knee OA, but only in the field of rheumatology or sport medicine, not when used during surgery. PRP have been used in ACL reconstruction, no benefit has been reported in any study regarding clinical or radiological outcomes. In shoulder cuff disorder, to date, no clinical benefit nor increased healing rate have been clearly reported. Thus, in 2013, it is clear that there is no evidence base medicine data supporting the use of PRP in arthroscopic surgery.
