[Emotional competence of patients with chronic pain : A self- and third-party assessment]. / Emotionale Kompetenzen bei Menschen mit chronifizierten Schmerzen : Ein Selbst- und Fremdbild.

RESEARCH QUESTION: The aim of the study is to assess the status quo of emotional competence in people with chronic pain. How do patients experience themselves regarding to their ability to perceive, express, and regulate emotions? And does this assessment coincide with the assessment of emotional competence (EC) by mental health professionals? METHODS: The study took place in the context of interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy at an outpatient clinic in N = 184 adult German-speaking individuals with non-cancer-related chronic pain. EC was assessed at the end of therapy using the self- and third-party assessment scales of the Emotional Competence Questionnaire. The external assessment was performed by the mental health team. Standard scores were created using the norm sample provided by questionnaires. These were analyzed descriptively and inferentially. RESULTS: Self-perceived EC was average (Mself_total = 99.31; SD = 7.78). The mental health professionals predominantly rated the emotional competence of the patients significantly lower (Mexternal_total = 94,70; SD = 7,81; F(1.179) = 35,73; p < 0.001; η2 = 0.17). Emotional expressivity, as a component of EC, was externally rated as below average (Mexpressivity_external = 89.14, SD = 10.33). DISCUSSION: Patients with chronic pain rate themselves as unimpaired in terms of their daily emotional awareness, expression, and regulation abilities. At the same time, mental health professionals rate these same individuals as significantly less emotionally competent. The question remains open as to what extent the divergent assessments can be explained by assessment bias.

Managers perception of hospital employees' effort-reward imbalance.

OBJECTIVE: Hospitals are frequently associated with poor working conditions that can lead to work stress and increase the risk for reduced employee well-being. Managers can shape and improve working conditions and thereby, the health of their teams. Thus, as a prerequisite, managers need to be aware of their employees' stress levels. This study had two objectives: At first, it aimed to test the criterion validity of the Effort-Reward Imbalance (ERI) questionnaire measuring psychosocial workload in hospital employees. Secondly, mean scales of the ERI questionnaire filled in by employees were compared with mean scales of an adapted ERI questionnaire, in which managers assessed working conditions of their employees. METHODS: Managers (n = 141) from three hospitals located in Germany assessed working conditions of their employees with an adapted external, other-oriented questionnaire. Employees (n = 197) of the mentioned hospitals completed the short version of the ERI questionnaire to assess their working conditions. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were applied to test factorial validity, using the ERI scales for the two study groups. Criterion validity was assessed with multiple linear regression analysis of associations between ERI scales and well-being among employees. RESULTS: The questionnaires demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties in terms of internal consistency of scales, although some indices of model fit resulting from CFA were of borderline significance. Concerning the first objective, effort, reward, and the ratio of effort-reward imbalance were significantly associated with well-being of employees. With regard to the second objective, first tentative findings showed that managers' ratings of their employees' effort at work was quite accurate, whereas their reward was overestimated. CONCLUSIONS: With its documented criterion validity the ERI questionnaire can be used as a screening tool of workload among hospital employees. Moreover, in the context of work-related health promotion, managers' perceptions of their employees' workload deserve increased attention as first findings point to some discrepancies between their perceptions and those provided by employees.

Mycotoxin Exposure and Renal Cell Carcinoma Risk: An Association Study in the EPIC European Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Mycotoxins have been suggested to contribute to a spectrum of adverse health effects in humans, including at low concentrations. The recognition of these food contaminants being carcinogenic, as co-occurring rather than as singularly present, has emerged from recent research. The aim of this study was to assess the potential associations of single and multiple mycotoxin exposures with renal cell carcinoma risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort. METHODS: Food questionnaire data from the EPIC cohort were matched to mycotoxin food occurrence data compiled by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) from European Member States to assess long-term dietary mycotoxin exposures, and to associate these with the risk of renal cell carcinoma (RCC, n = 911 cases) in 450,112 EPIC participants. Potential confounding factors were taken into account. Analyses were conducted using Cox's proportional hazards regression models to compute hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) with mycotoxin exposures expressed as µg/kg body weight/day. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics differed between the RCC cases and non-cases for body mass index, age, alcohol intake at recruitment, and other dietary factors. In addition, the mycotoxin exposure distributions showed that a large proportion of the EPIC population was exposed to some of the main mycotoxins present in European foods such as deoxynivalenol (DON) and derivatives, fumonisins, Fusarium toxins, Alternaria toxins, and total mycotoxins. Nevertheless, no statistically significant associations were observed between the studied mycotoxins and mycotoxin groups, and the risk of RCC development. CONCLUSIONS: These results show an absence of statistically significant associations between long-term dietary mycotoxin exposures and RCC risk. However, these results need to be validated in other cohorts and preferably using repeated dietary exposure measurements. In addition, more occurrence data of, e.g., citrinin and fumonisins in different food commodities and countries in the EFSA database are a prerequisite to establish a greater degree of certainty.

Contextual factors of external inspections and mechanisms for improvement in healthcare organizations: A realist evaluation.

External inspections constitute a key element of healthcare regulation. Improved quality of care is one of the important goals of inspections but the mechanisms of how inspections might contribute to quality improvement are poorly understood. Drawing on interviews with healthcare professionals and managers and health record data from inspected organizations, we used a realist evaluation approach to explore how twelve inspections of healthcare providers in x= Norway influenced quality improvement. We found that for inspections to contribute to quality improvement, there must be contextual structures present supporting accountability and engaging staff in improvement work. When such structures are present, inspections can contribute to improvement by creating awareness of gaps between desired and current practices, which leads to readiness for change and stimulates intra-organizational reasoning around quality improvement. We discuss our findings using the theory of de- and recoupling, noting how regulators can identify decoupling between intended goals, management systems, practices, and patient outcomes. We further argue that regulators can contribute to a recoupling between these levels by having the capacity to track the providers' clinical performance over time. This will hold the organization accountable for implementing improvement measures and evaluate the effects of the measures on quality of care.

Estimation of CO2 flux components over northern hemisphere forest ecosystems by using random forest method through temporal and spatial data scanning procedures.

Modeling CO2 flux components is an important task in ecosystem analysis and terrestrial studies. Net ecosystem exchange (NEE), ecosystem respiration (R), and gross primary production (GPP) are three CO2 flux components. Despite the ecosystem land cover characteristics, climatic factors can make considerable impact on quantity and mechanism of these components. Nevertheless, such climatic factors are not available in most of the areas, especially in developing regions. Therefore, obtaining the models that can exempt using locally recorded variables would be of great importance. A modeling study was carried out here to simulate CO2 flux components using soft computing-based random forest (RF) model in both local and external (spatial) scales, assessed by k-fold validation procedure. Data from 11 sites located in three forest ecosystems, e.g. deciduous broad leaf (DBF), evergreen needle leaf (ENF), and mixed forest (MF), were used to simulate the flux components. The obtained results showed that the temperature-related parameters (e.g., air and soil temperature, vapor pressure deficit) along with the net radiation play key role in determining the flux components in all studied ecosystems. It was confirmed that a chronologic scan of the available patterns is needed for a thorough assessment of the performance accuracy of the local models. The external models provided promising results when compared with the locally trained models. This is a very great step forward in estimating CO2 flux components under data scarcity conditions.

A comparison of the 33-item Hypomania Checklist with the 33-item Hypomania Checklist-external assessment for the detection of bipolar disorder in adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Adolescents with bipolar disorder (BD) are often misdiagnosed as having major depressive disorder (MDD), which delays appropriate treatment and leads to adverse outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the 33-item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) with the 33-item Hypomania Checklist- external assessment (HCL-33-EA) in adolescents with BD or MDD. METHODS: 147 adolescents with BD and 113 adolescents with MDD were consecutively recruited. The HCL-33 and HCL-33-EA were completed by patients and their carers, respectively. The sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated and compared between the two instruments, using cut-off values based on the Youden's index. RESULTS: The total scores of the HCL-33 and HCL-33-EA were positively and significantly correlated (rs = 0.309, P < 0.001). Compared to the HCL-33, the HCL-33-EA had higher sensitivity and NPV (HCL-33: sensitivity = 0.58, NPV = 0.53; HCL-33-EA: sensitivity = 0.81, NPV = 0.60), while the HCL-33 had higher specificity and PPV (HCL-33: specificity = 0.61, PPV = 0.66; HCL-33-EA: specificity = 0.37, PPV = 0.63). CONCLUSION: Both the HCL-33 and HCL-33-EA seem to be useful for screening depressed adolescents for BD. The HCL-33-EA would be more appropriate for distinguishing BD from MDD in adolescents due to its high sensitivity in Chinese clinical settings.

Programa alternativo de evaluación externa de calidad para serología de SARS-CoV-2: calidad en tiempos de pandemia / Alternative external quality assessment programme for SARS-CoV-2 serology: quality in pandemic times

Resumen Para el control de la pandemia por COVID-19 es indispensable contar con ensayos confiables para la detección de anticuerpos anti-síndrome respiratorio agudo severo por coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Por este motivo el Laboratorio de Serología y la Residencia de Bioquímica Clínica del Hospital Garrahan desarrollaron el primer Programa Piloto Alternativo de evaluación externa de la calidad para serología de SARS-CoV-2 en la Argentina, destinado a evaluar comparativamente el desempeño de los métodos disponibles de los participantes con el fin de asegurar resultados confiables y clínicamente útiles. El esquema constó de 4 envíos con 5 muestras cada uno, con reactividad variable contra SARS-CoV-2 en las que se evaluaron anticuerpos totales, IgG e IgM. Participaron 21 laboratorios, tanto públicos como privados, de la Provincia y de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires de forma gratuita. Informaron metodología utilizada y resultados. Al finalizar cada entrega se enviaron los reportes individuales y se realizó un informe final global con los resultados totales del ciclo. El mismo se llevó a cabo a lo largo del segundo semestre de 2020. Se informó un total de 643 resultados, 239 de anti- SARS-CoV-2 IgM, 365 de IgG y 39 de anticuerpos totales. Se observó mayor concordancia en las metodologías anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG que en las IgM. ELISA/ COVIDAR fue la metodología más utilizada para IgG y ELFA/bioMérieux para IgM. El espectro de metodologías fue amplio. El programa fue útil para asegurar la calidad de los resultados y brindó a los participantes el marco necesario para emitir resultados confiables y armonizados.

Abstract For the control of COVID-19 pandemic it is essential to have reliable tests for the detection of antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome due to coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). For this reason, the Serology Laboratory and the Residence of Clinical Biochemistry of Hospital Garrahan developed the first Alternative Pilot Programme for external quality assessment for SARS-CoV-2 serology in Argentina, aimed at comparatively evaluating the actuaperformance of the available methods of the participants using different anti-SARS-CoV tests in order to ensure reliable and clinically useful results. The scheme consisted of 4 deliveries with 5 samples each throughout the second semester of 2020, with variable reactivity against SARS-CoV-2 in which total antibodies, IgG and IgM were evaluated. Twenty one public and private laboratories participated in the Province and the City of Buenos Aires for free. The methodology applied and the results were informed. At the end of each delivery, individual reports were sent and a final global report was made with the total results of the cycle. A total of 643 results were reported, 239 for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM, 365 for IgG and 39 for total antibodies. There was greater agreement in the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG methodologies than in IgM. ELISA/COVIDAR was the most frequently used methodology for IgG and ELFA/bioMérieux for IgM. The spectrum of methodologies was wide. The programme was useful to ensure the quality of the results, providing the participants with the necessary framework to issue reliable and harmonised results.

Resumo Para o controle da pandemia de COVID-19, é imprescindível a existência de testes confiáveis para a detecção de anticorpos anti síndrome respiratória aguda grave por coronavírus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Por esse motivo o Laboratório de Sorologia e a Residência de Bioquímica Clínica do Hospital Garrahan desenvolveram o primeiro Programa Piloto Alternativo de avaliação externa da qualidade para sorologia de SARS-CoV-2 na Argentina, com o objetivo de avaliar comparativamente o desempenho dos métodos disponíveis dos participantes para garantir resultados confiáveis e clinicamente úteis. O esquema consistiu em 4 remessas com 5 amostras cada uma, com reatividade variável contra SARS-CoV-2 em que foram avaliados anticorpos totais, IgG e IgM. Participaram 21 laboratórios públicos e privados da Província e da Cidade de Buenos Aires que participaram em forma gratuita. Eles relataram a metodologia utilizada e os resultados. Ao final de cada entrega, foram enviados relatórios individuais e foi feito um relatório final global com os resultados totais do ciclo. Ele foi realizado ao longo do segundo semestre de 2020. Um total de 643 resultados foram relatados, 239 de anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM, 365 de IgG e 39 de anticorpos totais. Foi observada maior concordância nas metodologias anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG do que nas IgM. ELISA/COVIDAR foi a metodologia mais utilizada para IgG e ELFA/bioMérieux para IgM. O espectro de metodologias foi amplo. O programa foi útil para garantir a qualidade dos resultados, proporcionando aos participantes o enquadramento necessário para a emissão de resultados confiáveis e harmonizados.

Claustro docente en Medicina: dos procesos de acreditación en la Facultad Salvador Allende / Faculty in the Medical Major: two accreditation processes at Salvador Allende School

Introducción: A nivel internacional, la comunidad universitaria considera no pensar en la calidad de la educación superior como un fin disociado de la inserción concreta de la universidad en un determinado contexto social. La evaluación de la calidad aparece en la agenda de los países a mediados de la década de los años 90, como consecuencia de dos fenómenos complementarios: el incremento de la demanda y el desarrollo del sector de corte empresarial. Objetivo: Caracterizar el potencial y la producción científica del claustro docente de la carrera de Medicina de la Facultad Salvador Allende en dos procesos de evaluación externa. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio cualitativo, retrospectivo, con carácter comparativo-descriptivo del claustro docente, durante los procesos de evaluación externa de los años 2013 y 2019, incluidos 340 y 381 profesores, respectivamente. Se utilizaron métodos descriptivos, medidas absolutas y relativas para variables cualitativas y cuantitativas, aplicada la prueba de comparación de medias en muestras independientes y pareadas. Resultados: La acreditación de 2019 mostró un incremento de profesores con categorías titular o auxiliar y grado científico. El total de los profesores principales de las disciplinas y años de la carrera ostentaban categorías superiores como máster o especialista de primer grado. Conclusiones: Se evidenció estabilidad y desarrollo del claustro docente, e insuficiente incremento de grado científico y especialista de segundo grado. Las ponencias en eventos científicos se incrementaron por profesor, así como los índices de publicación, con predominio de los grupos I y II(AU)

Introduction: Internationally, the university community considers not thinking about higher education quality as an aim dissociated from concrete university insertion in a certain social context. Quality assessment appeared on the countries' agendas in the mid-1990s, as a consequence of two complementary phenomenons: the increase in demand and the development of the business sector. Objective: To characterize scientific potential resources and production of the faculty of the medical major at Salvador Allende School in two external assessment processes. Methods: A qualitative, retrospective, comparative-descriptive study of the faculty was carried out during two external assessment processes, in 2013 and 2019, including 340 and 381 professors, respectively. Descriptive methods, as well as absolute and relative measures were used for qualitative and quantitative variables, applying the means comparison test in independent and paired samples. Results: The 2019 accreditation showed an increase in the numbers of full and auxiliary professors and a scientific degree. The whole number of the main professors of the disciplines and from the academic years of the major held higher categories, such as a master's degree, or first-degree specialist. Conclusions: Stability and development of the faculty was evidenced, as well as insufficient increase in the numbers of scientific degrees and second-degree specialists. Presentations in scientific events increased per professor, as it was for the case of publication rates, with a predominance of groups I and II(AU)

Certification as support for resilience? Behind the curtains of a certification body - a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Certification in healthcare often involves independent private sector bodies performing legally required or voluntary external assurance activities. These certification practices are embedded in international standards founded in traditional beliefs about rational and predictable processes for quality and safety improvement. Certification can affect organizational and cultural changes, support collaboration and encourage improvement that may be conducive to resilient performance. This study explores whether ISO 9001 quality management system certification can support resilience in healthcare, by looking at characteristics in the objectives, methods, and practice of certification from a certification body's perspective. METHODS: One of Norway's four certification bodies in healthcare was studied, using an explorative embedded single-case design. The study relies on document analysis of the international standards and associated guidances for the performance of certification bodies and thematic analyses of data from 60 h of observations of auditors in three certification processes and nine qualitative interviews with managers and personnel from the certification body. Results from the analyses were compared to identify discrepancies between the written and perceived certification approach and practice. RESULTS: Standards and guidances for certification embed an elasticity between formal and consistent assessments of nonconformities in organizations and emphasize holistic approaches that brings added value. Auditors were then left with the latitude to navigate their auditing strategy during interaction with the auditees. Members of the certification body perceived and practiced a holistic and flexible auditing approach using opportunities to share knowledge, empower and make guidance for improvement. CONCLUSIONS: ISO certification expects structures and systems to ensure consistent and objective certification processes. At the same time, it embodies a latitude to adopt flexible and context-specific certification approaches, as demonstrated by a certification body in this study, to give added value to the certified organizations. Such an ISO 9001 certification approach may support resilient performance in healthcare by nurturing the potential to respond and learn. These results are important for further development of methods that certification bodies use in the auditing encounter.

Exploring hospital certification processes from the certification body's perspective - a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Hospital certification is an external assessment mechanism to assure quality and safety systems. Auditors representing the certification body play a key role in certification processes, as they perform the assessment activities and interact with the involved healthcare organizations. There is limited knowledge about the approaches and methods that auditors use, such as role repertoire, conduct, and assessment practice. The purpose of this study was to explore auditors' practice in hospital certification processes, guided by the following research questions: What styles do auditors apply in hospital certification processes, and how do auditors perceive their role in hospital certification processes? METHODS: The study was performed in two stages. In the first stage, non-participant observations (59 h) were conducted, to explore the professional practice of three lead auditors in certification processes of Norwegian hospitals. In the second stage, semi-structured interviews were conducted with these three observed lead auditors. The role repertoires and conducts identified were analyzed by using a deductive approach according to a surveyor (equivalent with auditor) styles typology framework. RESULTS: Two distinct auditor styles ("explorer" and "discusser") were identified among the three studied auditors. Both styles were characterized by their preference for an opportunistic and less structured type of interview practice during certification audits. All three auditors embedded a guiding approach (reflections about findings, stimulate improvements, experience transfer from other industries) to their perception and practice of certification audits, interacting with the auditees. The use of group interviews instead of individual interviews during certification audits, was the rule of their professional practice. CONCLUSION: The auditors' perceptions and styles demonstrated a multifaceted certification reality, in contrast to what is often presumed as consistent, stringent and independent practices. These findings may have implications for reliability judgements when developing hospital certification programs, and for the refinement of the current framework used here to study the different auditing practices.

Exploration of the psychometric properties of the 33-item Hypomania Checklist - external assessment (HCL-33-EA).

BACKGROUND: Misdiagnosis of bipolar disorder (BD) is common in clinical practice, leading to inappropriate treatment and detrimental consequences. The 33-item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) is a newly developed screening instrument for hypomanic symptoms in patients with BD. The 33-item Hypomania Checklist-external assessment (HCL-33-EA) is a version of the HCL-33 for carers of patients with mood disorders. In this study, the psychometric properties of the HCL-33-EA in a Chinese population were explored. METHOD: A total of 182 inpatients and 240 carers were recruited in this study. Patients were diagnosed with bipolar depression or major depressive disorder (MDD) according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). The patients completed the HCL-33, while their carers filled out the HCL-33-EA. RESULTS: The HCL-33-EA showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.876) with two-factorial dimensions. Paired samples t-test revealed that the mean score of the HCL-33-EA was significantly lower than that of the HCL-33 (t = 10.1, p < 0.001). Spearman's rho showed that the two instruments were significantly and positively correlated (r = 0.46, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The HCL-33-EA has acceptable psychometric properties and could be an effective screening tool for patients' carers, enabling identification of the symptoms of hypomania.

Coping with more people with more illness. Part 2: new generation of standards for enabling healthcare system transformation and sustainability.

In Part 2 of this two-part contribution made on behalf of the Innovation and Systems Change Working Group of the International Society for Quality in Health Care (ISQua), we continue the argument for refashioning health systems in response to ageing and other pressures. Massive ageing in many countries and accompanying technological, fiscal and systems changes are causing the tectonic plates of healthcare to shift in ways not yet fully appreciated. In response, while things remain uncertain, we nevertheless have to find ways to proceed. We propose a strategy for stakeholders to pursue, of key importance and relevance to the ISQua: to harness flexible standards and external assessment in support of needed change. Depending on how they are used, healthcare standards and accreditation can promote, or hinder, the changes needed to create better healthcare for all in the future. Standards should support people's care needs across the life cycle, including prevention and health promotion. New standards that emphasise better coordination of care, those that address the entire healthcare journey and standards that reflect and predict technological changes and support new models of care can play a part. To take advantage of these opportunities, governance bodies, external assessment agencies and other authorities will need to be less prescriptive and better at developing more flexible standards that apply to the entire health journey, incorporating new definitions of excellence and acceptability. The ISQua welcomes playing a leadership role.

Screening for distress in patients with intracranial tumors during the first 6 months after diagnosis using self-reporting instruments and an expert rating scale (the basic documentation for psycho-oncology short form - PO-Bado SF).

OBJECTIVE: Psychosocial screening in brain tumor patients is of high importance. We applied The Basic Documentation for Psycho-Oncology Short Form (PO-Bado SF) in primary brain tumor patients and patients with metastasis. The aim was to evaluating consistency between physicians' perception and the results of the patients' self-assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 140 patients with first diagnosis of a brain tumor were screened during their hospital stay (t1) using Distress Thermometer (DT) and Hornheide Screening Instrument (HSI), health-related quality of life was assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 + BN20. After 3 (t2) and 6 months (t3), patients were re-evaluated. Attending neuro-oncologists completed the PO-Bado SF at all three time points (cut-off for being in need for support >8). RESULTS: At t1, the mean of the PO-Bado SF total score was 7.71 (SD = 4.08), at t2 8.22 (SD = 5.40) and at t3 7.62 (SD = 5.72).The proportion of patients reaching a total score >8 was at t1: 43%, at t2: 41% and at t3: 47% (t1-3). Discrimination of PO-Bado SF total score, between patients in (DT ≥6) and those not in distress was more sensitive (cut-off 8.5, AUC 0.772, sens. 71.3%, spec. 67.6%) than discrimination compared to the HIS (cut-off 9.5, AUC 0.779, sens. 65.1%, spec. 77.7%). Higher PO-Bado-SF total score correlated with higher DT scores (r = 0.6, p < 0.0001) and lower EORTC GHS scores (r = -0.55, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Physicians' perception according to PO-Bado SF provides a different measure for psychosocial burden in patients with brain tumors, however does not completely reflect patients' wishes.

Implementation of the External Quality Assessment Program in Brazil.

The External Quality Assessment (EQA) in Brazil is performed by the National Health Ministry for diseases that are under supervision of Public Health Department. In addition to the government program, the Brazilian Society of Clinical Analysis and the Brazilian Society of Medical Pathology are allowed to provide their programs under the Supervision of National Agency for Sanitary Surveillance (ANVISA) that regulates laboratories to perform EQA programs.

The 33-item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) - a study of the consistency between self - and external assessments in Polish bipolar patients. / Kwestionariusz Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) u polskich pacjentów z choroba afektywna dwubiegunowa ­ badanie zgodnosci miedzy ocena wlasna a ocena przez osobe z zewnatrz.

OBJECTIVES: The Hypomania Checklist (HCL) has become an important tool for the assessment of hypomanic symptoms in patients with mood disorders and in the general population. The HCL-33 scale, containing 33 symptom items, is a new instrument which, in addition to the self-administered questionnaire, has a version for external rating. The aim of this study is to evaluate the consistency between the self - and external assessments using the HCL-33 in Polish patients with bipolar disorder. METHODS: The data from 81 euthymic bipolar patients recruited in Poznan and Krakow centers were analyzed. All the patients filled out the HCL-33 questionnaire, and, for each patient, the HCL-33 questionnaire-external assessment was completed by his/her significant other. RESULTS: Of the 33 symptom items, sufficient agreement (significance of kappa factor < 0.05) was found for 13 out of the 19 questions of the "active/elated" (factor 1) and for all 14 items of the "irritable/risk-taking" (factor 2). Insignificant consistency was found for 6 items of factor 1 and the question regarding the longest period of hypomania. The inter-rater agreement between patient and significant other was not affected by gender, living together or subtype of relationship with the patient. CONCLUSIONS: The results show significant consistency between self - and external assessments for 27 symptom items (82%) of the HCL-33. The future status of the items showing insufficient consistency should be discussed. Limitation of the study is a small number of subjects recruited from only two centers which may not be representative for the Polish population.

Routine outcome measurement in mental health service consumers: who should provide support for the self-assessments?

This study examined whether mental health community service users completed outcome self-reports differently when assessments were supervised by internal vs. external staff. The examination of potential differences between the two has useful implications for mental health systems that take upon themselves the challenge of Routine Outcome Measurement (ROM), as it might impact allocation of public resources and managed care program planning. 73 consumers completed the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA), a shortened version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS), and a functioning questionnaire. Questionnaires were administered, once using support provided by internal staff and once using support provided by external professional staff, with a one-month time interval and in random order. A MANOVA Repeated Measures showed no differences in outcomes of quality of life and recovery between internal and external support. Functioning scores were higher for the internal support when the internal assessments were performed first. Overall, except for the differences in functioning assessment, outcome scores were not determined by the supporting agency. This might indicate that when measuring quality of life and recovery, different supporting methods can be used to gather outcome measures and internal staff might be a good default agency to do this. Differences found in functioning assessment are discussed.