Early Health Impacts of a Primary Care Consultation Model for People Served by Assertive Community Treatment teams.

The cardiometabolic health outcomes and life expectancy of people living with serious mental illness (SMI) continue to significantly flag behind that of the general population. This study explores the possibility of using the evidence-based Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) model and infrastructure to increase access to primary care and improve cardiometabolic outcomes of people with SMI. Four ACT teams in a large urban area received the services of a primary care consultant who was co-located at a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC), met regularly with ACT team clinicians to review a cardiometabolic registry of participants, and engaged participants in primary care services. Health screening rates, primary care utilization, and cardiometabolic outcomes-body mass index, blood pressure, hemoglobin A1c, cholesterol, and tobacco smoking status-were monitored over the course of a year. The efficacy of this integrated care model was also explored through focus groups with ACT team staff and participants. Significant improvements in screening rates were found for the ACT teams that received this integrated care intervention; however, only modest improvements in cardiometabolic outcomes were found. Future longitudinal, multi-site studies are needed to fully determine the impact of integrated care models on the physical health outcomes of this vulnerable population.

Centering the role of community health workers in social risk screening, referral, and follow-up within the primary care setting.

BACKGROUND: Community health workers (CHWs) remain an underutilized resource in social risk diagnostics in the primary care setting. This process evaluation study seeks to assess the role of CHWs in social risk screening, referral, and follow-up through process mapping to identify barriers to the process for future quality improvement efforts. METHODS: Researchers at the Arizona Prevention Research Center (AzPRC) engaged with two Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) in two of Arizona's major urban areas to evaluate their internal processes for social risk screening and intervention. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to direct a process mapping exercise to visually describe the workflow, gaps, and barriers to identifying and addressing social risk. RESULTS: The process unveiled key areas for health system improvements in the community setting, the organizational setting, and in the implementation of social risk screening, referral, and follow-up. Further, process maps highlight the potential resources needed for effective CHW integration to address social risk in the primary care setting. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate the importance of organizational tools, such as process mapping, to assist primary care settings in evaluating internal processes for quality improvement in addressing social risk and in effectively integrating the CHW workforce. Subsequent research will evaluate rates of social risk screening, referral, and follow-up within all of Arizona's FQHCs and propose models for CHW integration to address social risk in primary care and strengthen social risk screening reach and effectiveness.

Age-Friendly Health Systems Integration into Rural Primary Care Clinics: A Journey of One Geriatric Workforce Enhancement Program.

This study explores the implementation of the Age-Friendly Health Systems (AFHS) 4Ms Framework into primary care clinics in rural Arkansas, facilitated by the AGEC and funded by The Health Resources and Services Administration's Geriatric Workforce Enhancement Program (GWEP) grant. Implementation success is evaluated by monitoring merit-based incentive payment system (MIPS) measures and other variables, providing insight into the effectiveness of integrating AFHS and enhancing older adult care. AGEC employed implementation strategies (train-the-trainer, audit and feedback, and clinical reminders using Electronic Medical Record (EMR)), the i-PARIHS implementation framework, and the RE-AIM evaluation framework to facilitate integration of the AFHS 4Ms Framework into partnered rural federally qualified healthcare clinics (FQHC). AGEC aimed to equip the healthcare workforce through comprehensive training sessions and resource provision. Additionally, the EMR system modifications guided clinicians in aligning care with the AFHS 4Ms Framework. This multifaceted approach ensured a systematic and tailored implementation, enhancing the capacity of rural FQHCs in Arkansas to deliver Age-Friendly care. Improvements were observed in MIPS outcome measures, including increased completion of fall and depression screens, Annual Wellness Visits (AWV) and Advance Care Plans (ACP). These changes reflect a proactive impact on comprehensive care delivery for older adults. Since adopting the AFHS 4Ms Framework, these rural Arkansas FQHC clinics have significantly enhanced their older adult care, earning recognition as AFHS Clinics by the Institute for Health Improvement (IHI). Primary care practices nationwide can implement similar evidence-based approaches to improve care for the expanding older adult population in the U.S.

Impact of a Pharmacist-Led HCV Treatment Program at a Federally Qualified Health Center.

Pharmacists are key players who can help to eliminate the hepatitis C virus (HCV) epidemic in the United States. This pilot retrospective study evaluated the impact of a pharmacist-led HCV treatment program in a federally qualified health center (FQHC) primary care clinic setting. The primary outcome was to assess sustained virologic response (SVR) rates 12 weeks after patients were initiated and completed their oral direct acting antiviral (DAA) treatment regimens. METHODS: This pilot retrospective study included historical analyses of patients who received DAA treatment in the pharmacist-led HCV treatment program in a FQHC clinic between 1 January 2019 and 31 January 2021. SVR was the primary outcome measure for treatment response. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients with HCV mono- and HIV co-infection were referred, and 59 patients were initiated on DAA regimens after treatment. Fifty of those who were started on DAA regimens completed their treatment, and 38 achieved SVR (modified intention to treat [mITT] SVR rate of 76%). CONCLUSION: Our study's findings demonstrated SVR rates that were comparable with other pharmacist-directed HCV treatment services in the United States despite the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Our study included a higher proportion of individuals with HCV/HIV co-infection and of Hispanic ethnicity.

Pre-pandemic preventable hospitalization is associated with increased telemedicine use in safety-net settings.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a major expansion in telemedicine use. The continued use of telemedicine post-pandemic has the potential to enhance healthcare use for people at risk for sub-optimal healthcare access and utilization, such as patients with previous preventable hospitalization. This study analyzed the association between pre-pandemic preventable hospitalizations (PPHs) and telemedicine use during the pandemic. Methods: This retrospective cohort study uses Medicaid administrative claims data (01/2018-06/2022) for patients of a large Federally Qualified Health Center in Arizona that implemented telemedicine in March 2020. Bivariate and multivariable generalized estimating equations were used to analyze the relationship between the outcome and predictor variables. We also analyze racial/ethnic and primary language disparities in telemedicine use among those with PPH and report the average predicted probability. Results: There was a statistically significant relationship between telemedicine use and PPH even after adjusting for comorbidity severity (OR:1.85; CI: 1.74, 1.96). Analyses restricted to those who had PPHs showed an seven-percentage point difference in the predicted probability of telemedicine use between non-Hispanic White individuals and Asian/Pacific Islanders, the group with the lowest probability of telemedicine use among our study sample. Conclusion: Telemedicine is a unique tool that can be leveraged by interventions that aim to optimize healthcare use among those with a history of preventable hospitalizations. However, the lack of targeted interventions to identify and address barriers to telemedicine use among minoritized groups could limit the impact of such interventions and widen disparities.

At what risk? A research note on interviewer burden.

BACKGROUND: We report on our methodological experiences during an investigation of how institutional racism functions in healthcare. We found tension between balancing methodological rigor with the unanticipated consequence of interviewer burden. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and qualitatively analyzed using thematic content analysis. Interviewers also participated in weekly debriefing sessions and reported experiences with patients. RESULTS: Interviewers repeatedly experienced negative encounters with white patients during interviews. Themes included privilege to avoid racism, denial of racism, non-verbal discomfort, falsely claiming Native identities, and intimidation. These experiences were most pronounced with Black interviewers. DISCUSSION: Interviewer burden may need to be a consideration taken up in a variety of research contexts.

Association between dental visits during pregnancy and setting for prenatal care.

OBJECTIVES: Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) may be well positioned to facilitate dental visits during pregnancy for low-income women. We sought to compare receipt of dental visits during pregnancy for women who received prenatal care at an FQHC versus a non-FQHC setting. METHODS: We analyzed Michigan Medicaid administrative data for all live birth deliveries between April 2018 and December 2020. We used billing data to categorize the predominant setting for prenatal care as occurring at a FQHC or a non-FQHC and claims data to identify dental visits during pregnancy (in the 9 months prior to delivery). We employed bivariate and multivariate analyses to explore the relationship between setting for prenatal care and dental visits during pregnancy. RESULTS: Women who received prenatal care at an FQHC versus non-FQHC had a higher proportion of dental visits during pregnancy (31.85% vs. 19.37%, p < 0.0001). In multivariate analyses, the strongest predictors of having a dental visit during pregnancy were FQHC prenatal care setting, having a dental emergency visit, having ≥3 prenatal visits, and having Medicaid coverage throughout pregnancy. Hispanic or Black race/ethnicity and 2020 delivery year were predictors of a lower likelihood of a dental visit. These predictors were consistent for the overall population and for the subset who had no dental visits pre-pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Medicaid-enrolled women who receive prenatal care at an FQHC are more likely to have a dental visit during pregnancy than their counterparts who receive prenatal care in a non-FQHC setting.

Evaluation of the COVID-19 Vaccination Campaign ¡Ándale! ¿Qué Esperas? in Latinx Communities in California, June 2021-May 2022.

OBJECTIVES: The 12-month vaccination campaign ¡Ándale! ¿Qué Esperas? was launched to increase COVID-19 vaccination rates in Latinx populations in California by expanding community outreach. The objectives of this evaluation were to (1) determine predictors of vaccination rates and (2) identify barriers to vaccination and potential solutions. METHODS: Five community partners in California serving Latinx populations with high social vulnerability participated in the ¡Ándale! ¿Qué Esperas? campaign. Community health workers were hired to deliver outreach (virtual, one-on-one, group based, and information dissemination), vaccinations, and supportive services. We collected data on outreach strategy used (method and location), number of vaccinations provided and reasons for delay, and number of times that supportive services were provided. We used regression models to assess significant predictors of vaccinations and supportive services. RESULTS: Community health workers (N = 146) hired from June 1, 2021, through May 31, 2022, performed outreach engagements (n = 6297) and supportive services (n = 313 796), resulting in 130 413 vaccinations and 28 660 vaccine appointments. The number of vaccinations administered was significantly higher at events in which supportive services were provided versus not provided (coefficient = 34.02; 95% CI, 3.34-64.68; P = .03). The odds ratio of supportive services was 3.67 (95% CI, 1.76-7.55) during virtual outreach and 2.95 (95% CI, 2.37-3.69) during one-on-one outreach (P < .001 for both) as compared with information dissemination encounters. Vaccination concerns were reported among 55.0% of vaccinated survey respondents (67.7%, vaccine confidence; 51.7%, access). CONCLUSIONS: Supportive services facilitate vaccinations, ease transportation and time barriers, and instill confidence among working-class racial and ethnic minority populations.

A randomized controlled trial of recovery management checkups for primary care patients: Twelve-month results.

BACKGROUND: Primary care settings like federally qualified health centers (FQHC) are optimal locations to identify individuals with substance use disorders (SUD) and link them to SUD treatment, yet successful linkage has proven difficult. Recovery management checkups for primary care (RMC-PC) is a promising method for increasing linkage to care, engagement in treatment, and reducing substance use. METHODS: Participants (n = 266) who received screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) at four FQHC sites and needed SUD treatment were randomized to receive SBIRT only or SBIRT+RMC-PC. All participants received SBIRT prior to randomization as part of usual care while those in the experimental group also received quarterly checkups. All participants completed research interviews at enrollment and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-enrollment. The primary outcome was whether participants received any days of SUD treatment. Key secondary outcomes were days of SUD treatment (total and by SUD level of care), days of alcohol or drug abstinence, and a reduction in days of specific substance use, all based on self-report. RESULTS: Relative to participants receiving SBIRT only, participants assigned to SBIRT+RMC-PC were significantly more likely to have received any SUD treatment over 12 months (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 3.85) and more days of SUD treatment over 12 months (Cohen's effect size d = +0.41). The SBIRT+RMC-PC group also reported significantly more days of abstinence over 12 months (d = +0.30), fewer days of alcohol use (d = -0.20) and cannabis use (d = -0.20), and lower combined substance use frequency (d = -0.25). Days of treatment were found to positively mediate the direct effect of SBIRT+RMC-PC on days of abstinence. CONCLUSION: This study provides further evidence of the effectiveness of the "referral to treatment" component of SBIRT when combined with RMC for patients in primary care settings, including those with drug use problems. Moreover, results demonstrate the value of repeated checkups on longer-term treatment and substance use outcomes.

Missed opportunities in aspirin prescribing for preeclampsia prevention.

BACKGROUND: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, including preeclampsia, are a leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality in the United States, particularly among low-income and historically marginalized populations. Evidence suggests low-dose aspirin prophylaxis may help prevent preeclampsia in individuals at increased risk of developing the disease. This study examines associations between preeclampsia risk factors and aspirin prescribing practices among patients receiving prenatal care at a network of federally qualified health centers (FQHC). METHODS: Researchers conducted retrospective chart reviews (n = 523) of pregnant individuals ages 18-50 who completed two or more prenatal visits at the FQHC between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2020. Prescription patterns for patients at moderate and high risk for preeclampsia were analyzed using unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models to identify the patients with the greatest risk of not receiving the recommended prophylactic treatment. RESULTS: Of 249 total patients considered at risk for preeclampsia, only 39% received an aspirin prescription. 57.89% of patients with any high-risk factor were appropriately prescribed aspirin, but only 27.27% of patients with two or more moderate-risk factors without high-risk factors received a prescription. Clinicians most frequently prescribed aspirin for patients with a history of preeclampsia and history of hypertension. However, aspirin was prescribed a maximum of 78.79% of the time for patients with a prior history of hypertension. Among moderate-risk factors, patients with advanced maternal age, Black race, or nulliparity were significantly more likely in adjusted models to be prescribed aspirin. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the documented benefits of aspirin prescribing and support from professional societies, there are still many missed opportunities for aspirin prophylaxis to prevent preeclampsia. Future interventions should focus on identifying patients who qualify for aspirin prophylaxis on the basis of having multiple moderate-risk factors without comorbid high-risk factors.

Prioritizing ethical patient care responsibilities: A call to restructure student training practices in federally qualified health centers.

Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) are federally funded clinics that often serve medically underserved groups. Many Colleges of Pharmacy have faculty and non-faculty pharmacist preceptors who provide clinical services such as drug therapy management to FQHCs. It is critical that Colleges of Pharmacy and pharmacist preceptors reinforce and uphold the standard of providing high quality and evidenced based care when students rotate at these sites. Learners may have implicit biases and variable levels of emotional intelligence prior to a clinical rotation at an FQHC, which can affect the quality-of-care patients receive. Colleges of Pharmacy who send learners onto rotations at FQHCs should collaborate with FQHC sites to ensure learner readiness in clinical and emotional levels and mediate for any concerns that may arise.

Providing Hepatitis C Treatment Locally for Substance-Using Patients.

This quality improvement (QI) project provided Hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment at a Federally Qualified Health Clinic (FQHC) for persons who use illicit drugs. Many of these individuals sought treatment at the local Infectious Disease (ID) clinic but were denied care as they require a patient be drug-free for 6 months prior to HCV treatment. These individuals expressed a desire to be cured of HCV, which can lead to liver failure or cirrhosis if left untreated. This project bridged the existing gap in HCV treatment that currently exists for substance-users in this city. Pre-treatment HCV levels were obtained from 20 participants who completed an 8-week daily regimen of Mavyret, a direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agent, prescribed by a primary care Nurse Practitioner (NP), trained to treat HCV. Pre-treatment HCV loads were compared to the sustained viral load, obtained 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR-12), which is considered the "test of cure." The results indicate that 100% of returning patients were considered cured of HCV. This program successfully integrated HCV treatment at a community health center, in a population affected by substance use. Adoption of similar programs in primary care clinics can help meet the clinical needs of this often stigmatized and vulnerable population as well as cure them of HCV.

Patient satisfaction with pharmacist-led chronic care management services combined with medication synchronization.

PURPOSE: Chronic care management (CCM) improves clinical outcomes, enhances patients' adherence with medical treatments, reduces overall cost, and increases patient satisfaction. However, multiple reports have indicated the underutilization of CCM. Implementation literature has emphasized feasibility and different approaches to providing pharmacist-led CCM. This article examines patient acceptability and provides an innovative implementation approach combining both CCM and medication synchronization (MedSync) services. SUMMARY: To introduce CCM services to underserved Medicare beneficiaries at a federally qualified health center, the pharmacy department of a federally qualified health center (FQHC) pilot tested a program whereby pharmacists provided CCM to Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in the MedSync service offered by the FQHC's in-house pharmacies. Both services were provided during the same phone call by the pharmacist. After successful completion of the pilot program, a retrospective chart review and patient satisfaction survey were conducted to enhance the quality of the service. A total of 49 patients were enrolled in the CCM program at the time of data collection. Overall, participants were satisfied with the service. The average number of medications per patient was 13.7. Pharmacists were able to identify an average of 4.8 medication-related problems (MRPs) per patient. Most of the MRPs (62%) were resolved directly by the pharmacists via education, over-the-counter medication adjustments, or interventions under consult agreements. CONCLUSION: In addition to positive patient satisfaction, pharmacists were able to identify and address a significant number of MRPs when providing CCM.

Implementing an enhanced mailed FIT program to improve CRC screening at a federally qualified health center: experiences of patients and staff.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer death in the USA. Screening programs in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) are essential to reducing CRC-related mortality and morbidity among underserved populations. Centralized, population-based mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) programs can improve CRC screening rates, but barriers to implementation remain. We qualitatively explored barriers and facilitators to implementation of a mailed FIT program at a large, urban FQHC that employed advance notification "primers" (live calls and texts) and automated reminders. We interviewed 25 patients and 45 FQHC staff by telephone about their experience with the program. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and content analyzed using NVivo.12. Patients and staff found advance notifications conveyed through live phone calls or text messages to be acceptable and motivational for FIT completion. Live phone primers were helpful in addressing patients' questions and misconceptions about screening, particularly for patients new to screening. Advance notifications sent by text were considered timely and useful in preparing patients for receipt of the FIT. Barriers to implementation included lack of receipt of primers, reminders, or the mailed FIT itself due to inaccurate patient contact information within the FQHC medical record; lack of systems for documenting mailed FIT outreach to coordinate with clinical care; and lack of local caller identification for primers and reminders. Our findings demonstrate that an enhanced mailed FIT program using primers and reminders was acceptable. Our findings can help other FQHCs implement and optimize their mailed FIT programs.

Does HPV vaccination initiation at age 9, improve HPV initiation and vaccine series completion rates by age 13?

Vaccination for Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is important to reduce rates of cervical and oropharyngeal cancer. We aimed to evaluate if a program to initiate HPV vaccination at 9 years improved initiation and completion rates by 13 years of age. Data on empaneled patients aged 9-13 years from January 1, 2021 to August 30, 2022 were abstracted from the electronic health record. Primary outcome measures included HPV vaccination initiation and series completion by 13 years of age. The secondary outcome measure was missed opportunities for HPV vaccination. In total, 25,888 patients were included (12,433 pre-intervention, and 13,455 post-intervention). The percentage of patients aged 9-13 with an in-person visit who received at least 1 dose of HPV vaccine increased from 30% pre-intervention to 43% post-intervention. The percentage of patients who received 2 doses of vaccine increased from 19.3% pre-intervention to 42.7% post-intervention. For the overall population seen in-person, initiation of HPV vaccination by age 13 years increased from 42% to 54%. HPV completion increased as well (13% to 18%). HPV vaccination initiation at 9 years of age may be an acceptable and effective approach to improving vaccination rates.

Recent Telehealth Utilization at a Large Federally Qualified Health Center System: Evidence of Disparities Even Within Telehealth Modalities.

Objective: To explore overall trends as well as racial/ethnic disparities in utilization of different telehealth modalities (telephone vs. televideo) at federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Using electronic health record data from a large New York-based FQHC system, we aggregated (separately) Behavioral Health and Family Practice visits per month occurring in-person, by telephone, or by televideo and graphed monthly trends in visits across the pre-pandemic, peak-pandemic, and post-peak-pandemic periods. We calculated fractions of visits conducted by modality for each patient demographic (race/ethnicity, primary language, age, gender, insurance type, and geography) and conducted bivariate assessments to test relationships between patient characteristics and modality. Results: Our data contained 121,072 unique patients and 811,105 visits overall. Telehealth use peaked in April 2020 but continued to account for a significant fraction of FQHC visits-nearly 25% (N = 4,908) of monthly Family Practice visits and a massive 98% (N = 14,173) of Behavioral Health visits as late as June 2021. Of all telehealth visits, nearly half were by telephone. Moreover, demographic factors differed between FQHC patients using telephone visits versus those using televideo: Black, non-English speaking, older, and Medicaid patients had significantly higher utilization of telephone visits than televideo visits (e.g., 25.9% of all Black patients' visits were via telephone vs. 17.1% via televideo; p < 0.001). In contrast, younger, Asian, and privately insured patients had significantly higher televideo visits. Conclusions: Our results suggest that telephone visits remain critical to the provision of health care for FQHC patients. They also suggest that disparities extend beyond the telehealth versus in-person dichotomy and inequities exist even within the type of telehealth used. This has implications for patient health, FQHC quality outcomes, as well as optimal Medicaid telehealth reimbursement policy.

Demographic Determinants and Geographical Variability of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Underserved Communities: Cross-sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths disproportionately affect underserved and minority populations, emphasizing that vaccine hesitancy can be an especially important public health risk factor in these populations. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to characterize COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in underserved diverse populations. METHODS: The Minority and Rural Coronavirus Insights Study (MRCIS) recruited a convenience sample of adults (age≥18, N=3735) from federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in California, the Midwest (Illinois/Ohio), Florida, and Louisiana and collected baseline data in November 2020-April 2021. Vaccine hesitancy status was defined as a response of "no" or "undecided" to the question "Would you get a coronavirus vaccine if it was available?" ("yes" categorized as not hesitant). Cross-sectional descriptive analyses and logistic regression models examined vaccine hesitancy prevalence by age, gender, race/ethnicity, and geography. The expected vaccine hesitancy estimates for the general population were calculated for the study counties using published county-level data. Crude associations with demographic characteristics within each region were assessed using the chi-square test. The main effect model included age, gender, race/ethnicity, and geographical region to estimate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. Interactions between geography and each demographic characteristic were evaluated in separate models. RESULTS: The strongest vaccine hesitancy variability was by geographic region: California, 27.8% (range 25.0%-30.6%); the Midwest, 31.4% (range 27.3%-35.4%); Louisiana, 59.1% (range 56.1%-62.1%); and Florida, 67.3% (range 64.3%-70.2%). The expected estimates for the general population were lower: 9.7% (California), 15.3% (Midwest), 18.2% (Florida), and 27.0% (Louisiana). The demographic patterns also varied by geography. An inverted U-shaped age pattern was found, with the highest prevalence among ages 25-34 years in Florida (n=88, 80.0%,) and Louisiana (n=54, 79.4%; P<.05). Females were more hesitant than males in the Midwest (n= 110, 36.4% vs n= 48, 23.5%), Florida (n=458, 71.6% vs n=195, 59.3%), and Louisiana (n= 425, 66.5% vs. n=172, 46.5%; P<.05). Racial/ethnic differences were found in California, with the highest prevalence among non-Hispanic Black participants (n=86, 45.5%), and in Florida, with the highest among Hispanic (n=567, 69.3%) participants (P<.05), but not in the Midwest and Louisiana. The main effect model confirmed the U-shaped association with age: strongest association with age 25-34 years (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.74-3.01). Statistical interactions of gender and race/ethnicity with the region were significant, following the pattern found by the crude analysis. Compared to males in California, the associations with the female gender were strongest in Florida (OR=7.88, 95% CI 5.96-10.41) and Louisiana (OR=6.09, 95% CI 4.55-8.14). Compared to non-Hispanic White participants in California, the strongest associations were found with being Hispanic in Florida (OR=11.18, 95% CI 7.01-17.85) and Black in Louisiana (OR=8.94, 95% CI 5.53-14.47). However, the strongest race/ethnicity variability was observed within California and Florida: the ORs varied 4.6- and 2-fold between racial/ethnic groups in these regions, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the role of local contextual factors in driving vaccine hesitancy and its demographic patterns.

Using recovery management checkups for primary care to improve linkage to alcohol and other drug use treatment: a randomized controlled trial three month findings.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recovery management checkups (RMC) have established efficacy for linking patients to substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. This study tested whether using RMC in combination with screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT), versus SBIRT alone, can improve linkage of primary care patients referred to SUD treatment. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial of SBIRT as usual (n = 132) versus SBIRT plus recovery management checkups for primary care (RMC-PC) (n = 134) with follow-up assessments at 3 months post-baseline. SETTING: Four federally qualified health centers in the United States serving low-income populations. PARTICIPANTS: Primary care patients (n = 266, 64% male, 80% Black, mean age, 48.3 [range, 19-53]) who were referred to SUD treatment after SBIRT. INTERVENTIONS: SBIRT alone (control condition) compared with SBIRT + RMC-PC (experimental condition). MEASUREMENT: The primary outcome was any days of SUD treatment in the past 3 months. Key secondary outcomes were days of SUD treatment overall and by level of care, days of alcohol and other drug (AOD) abstinence, and days of using specific substances, all based on self-report. FINDINGS: At 3-month follow-up, those assigned to SBIRT + RMC-PC (n = 134) had higher odds of receiving any SUD treatment (46% vs 20%; adjusted odds ratio = 4.50 [2.49, 8.48]) compared with SBIRT only, including higher rates of entering residential and intensive outpatient treatment. They also reported more days of treatment (14.45, vs 7.13; d = +0.26), more days abstinent (41.3 vs 31.9; d = +0.22), and fewer days of using alcohol (27.14, vs 36.31; d = -0.25) and cannabis (19.49, vs 28.6; d = -0.20). CONCLUSIONS: Recovery management checkups in combination with screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment are an effective strategy for improving linkage of primary care patients in need to substance use disorder treatment over 3 months.

Community Health Center 340B Program: A Qualitative Study of the Experiences of Patients with Diabetes.

Background: The 340B Drug Pricing Program provides discounted drug prices to safety-net entities which help stretch scarce resources to expand comprehensive services and treat more vulnerable patients. The program has received criticism questioning whether the original intentions are being accomplished. Objective: This qualitative study aimed to understand lived experiences of patients accessing high-cost injectable diabetes medication(s) through a 340B Prescription Cash Discount Program (PCDP) provided at a community health center. Methods: This qualitative study utilized semi-structured individual interviews. We invited patients ≥18 years old with diabetes for >1 year who utilized the 340B PCDP to fill an injectable diabetes medication at least twice between 3/1/2020-3/1/2021 to participate. Trained personnel interviewed ten participants in 11/2021-2/2022 and completed thematic analysis of the transcribed interviews. Results: Themes included 340B feedback, benefits of 340B, consequences of being without 340B, community pharmacy experience, and use of other services. Participants deemed the 340B program as a "lifesaver." Perceived benefits of the program included improved diabetes control and savings that made their prescriptions more affordable. Consequences of being without the program include that medication was too expensive to take as prescribed and rationing/skipping doses. Participants were pleased with the accessibility of the network of contract pharmacies and described benefiting from services supported by 340B savings. Conclusions: Recent criticisms question whether the 340B program accomplishes its original intentions of stretching scarce federal resources to help safety-net entities expand services and treat more patients. This study provides insight into the personal impact of the 340B program on underserved patients with chronic disease accessing high-cost medication(s). Findings highlight crucial strengths of the program from the patient perspective, which policymakers and other stakeholders should consider to provide support for the continuation of these services.

MiQuit: A Study Protocol to Link Low-Income Smokers to a State Tobacco Quitline.

Purpose: To conduct a randomized controlled trial to compare 3 implementation strategies and the impact of facilitated referrals on linkage of Federally Qualified Health Center patients to the Illinois Tobacco Quitline (ITQL). Methods: This study will be a hybrid type 3 implementation-effectiveness trial guided by 2 implementation science frameworks: reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance and exploration preparation implementation sustainment. We will evaluate whether sending provider messages through the patient electronic health portal increases patient linkage to the ITQL. We will (1) randomly assign all eligible patients to receive 1 of 3 messages (information about quitting, advice to quit, and advice to quit or cut down), and (2) we will offer a facilitated linkage to the ITQL. For patients who opt into a facilitated referral, we will share their contact information with the ITQL, who will contact them. Four weeks after the initial message, patients who expressed interest in services but were not reached by the ITQL will be rerandomized to 1 of 2 arms, an offer to reconnect to the ITQL or an offer to engage a peer navigator who can help them reconnect to the ITQL. We will assess the implementation strategies' reach, adoption, linkage, and sustainability with the ITQL. Discussion: This study will provide a new cost-effective and efficient model to link low-income smokers to state tobacco quitlines. Message delivery via patient health portals has important implications for addressing other tobacco-related morbidities.