The impact of neutrophil count on the results of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in immunocompromised febrile children.

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has revolutionized the detection of pathogens, particularly in immunocompromised individuals such as pediatric patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. This study aims to explore the impact of neutrophil count on the diagnostic efficacy of mNGS in diagnosing infections in pediatric patients with febrile diseases. We conducted a retrospective analysis of pediatric patients with febrile diseases in the hematology/oncology department from January 2019 to September 2022. The study included 387 patients with 516 febrile episodes. Analyzing data from 516 pediatric cases, our study found that 70.7 % had febrile neutropenia (FN) and 29.3 % had febrile without neutropenia (FWN). mNGS demonstrated a high positive detection rate of 84.9 %, compared to 29.7 % for conventional microbiological tests (CMT). While the positive detection rates of mNGS were similar in both FN and FWN groups, bacterial pathogens were more frequently detected in FN patients. Furthermore, the rate of identifying a "probable" microbial etiology was lower in the FN group (46.8 %) compared to the FWN group (65.6 %, p＜0.001). When analyzing the types of organisms and specimens, the "probable" identification rates were particularly lower for viruses and fungi detected by mNGS, as well as in blood and nasopharyngeal swab samples. These findings underscore the significant influence of neutrophil counts on mNGS results in pediatric febrile patients and highlight the necessity for tailored diagnostic approaches in this population.

Novel biomarkers to identify complicated course of febrile neutropenia in hematological patients receiving intensive chemotherapy.

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a common consequence of intensive chemotherapy in hematological patients. More than 90% of the patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) develop FN, and 5%-10% of them die from subsequent sepsis. FN is very common also in autologous stem cell transplant recipients, but the risk of death is lower than in AML patients. In this review, we discuss biomarkers that have been evaluated for diagnostic and prognostic purposes in hematological patients with FN. In general, novel biomarkers have provided little benefit over traditional inflammatory biomarkers, such as C-reactive protein and procalcitonin. The utility of most biomarkers in hematological patients with FN has been evaluated in only a few small studies. Although some of them appear promising, much more data is needed before they can be implemented in the clinical evaluation of FN patients. Currently, close patient follow-up is key to detect complicated course of FN and the need for further interventions such as intensive care unit admission. Scoring systems such as q-SOFA (Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) or NEWS (National Early Warning Sign) combined with traditional and/or novel biomarkers may provide added value in the clinical evaluation of FN patients.

Assessment value of interleukin-6, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein early kinetics for initial antibiotic efficacy in patients with febrile neutropenia: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to investigate the early kinetics of interleukin 6 (IL-6), procalcitonin (PCT), and C-reactive protein (CRP) on initial antibiotic efficacy in hematological disorder patients with febrile neutropenia (FN). METHODS: A total of 40 patients with 43 episodes of FN were enrolled and divided into initial antibiotic effective group (IAE group, n = 24) and initial antibiotic ineffective group (IAI group, n = 19). The levels of IL-6, PCT, and CRP before antibacterial treatment (T0), and 12 h (T1), 24 h (T2), 48 h (T3), and 72 h (T4) post-antibacterial treatment were determined, respectively. Furthermore, the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate the clinical value of indicators. RESULTS: In IAE group, the IL-6 levels gradually decreased from T0 to T4, and the CRP levels significantly decreased at 48 to 72 h, whereas both IL-6 and CRP remained at high levels in the IAI group. The PCT levels in both groups increased at the early stage of anti-infection (T1-T2) and reached to peak at T1-T2 in effective group. ROC curve analysis identified IL-6 as a predictive biomarker for initial antibiotic efficacy at 12, 48, and 72 h after treatment, with the AUC of 0.698, 0.744, and 0.821, respectively. In addition, CRP demonstrated predictive ability of initial antibiotics against infection at 24, 48, and 72 h after therapy, with the AUC of 0.724, 0.741, and 0.797, respectively. ROC curve analysis of percentage changes demonstrated that IL-6 percentage change showed predictive ability of antibiotic efficacy at the early stage, and both the IL-6 and CRP percentage changes showed the predictive ability of antibiotic efficacy 48 or 72 h after antibiotics therapy. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed IL-6 and CRP levels, and the percentage change in IL-6 as the biomarkers for initial antibiotic efficacy prediction in hematological disorder patients with FN.

Optimized high-dose granulocyte transfusions for the treatment of infections in neutropenic patients: A single-center retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte transfusions for patients with prolonged neutropenia and severe infections has been a controversial practice. Previous studies suggest a benefit of high-dose granulocyte transfusions (≥0.6 × 109/kg), although, until recently, the consistent production of high-dose units has been challenging. Here, we present our experience and results utilizing high-dose granulocyte transfusions at a large, tertiary academic medical center for the treatment of infections in adult, neutropenic patients. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS: A retrospective chart review (2018-2021) was conducted for all patients who received high-dose granulocyte transfusions from donors stimulated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and dexamethasone. Gathered parameters included patient demographics, clinical history, infection status, dose, clinical outcomes, pre- and post-absolute neutrophil count (ANC), and transfusion times including time between granulocyte collection, administration, and posttransfusion ANC count. Gathered parameters were summarized using descriptive statistics, outcomes were assessed utilizing Kaplan-Meier curves/log-rank/regression testing. RESULTS: Totally 28 adult, neutropenic patients refractory to antimicrobial agents and/or G-CSF received a total of 173 granulocyte concentrates. Median ANC increased from 0.7 × 109/L pre-transfusion to 1.6 × 109/L posttransfusion. The mean granulocyte yield was 77.4 × 109 resulting in an average dose per kilogram of 0.90 × 109 ± 0.30 × 109 granulocytes. Composite day 42 survival and microbial response was 42.9% (n = 12/28) without significant adverse reactions. DISCUSSION: Here, we demonstrate the successful and safe implementation of high-dose granulocyte transfusions for neutropenic patients. Given the rapid and consistent production, distribution, and improved granulocyte quality, further investigations to determine the clinical efficacy of G-CSF primed granulocyte transfusions is now possible.

Frequency and clinical impact of viraemia in paediatric patients undergoing therapy for cancer.

In contrast to transplant recipients, there is a paucity of data regarding frequency and clinical significance of viraemia in children receiving conventional chemotherapy. In a prospective observational study, we assessed the frequency of and clinical impact of viraemia with cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), adenovirus, human herpesvirus-6 (HHV6) and herpes-simplex virus 1/2 (HSV1/2) in paediatric cancer patients at diagnosis, at a routine examination during intensive chemotherapy, and during febrile neutropenia (FN). Seventy-nine patients (median age 6 years; 66 children with haematological malignancies) were included in the study. Overall, 362 blood samples were analysed, 72 from the time at diagnosis (11.1% with positive PCR result), 118 during a regular control after chemotherapy (11.0% positive), and 159 during FN (8.8% positive). The overall positivity rate was 9.6% (CMV 3.3%, HHV6 2.7%, HSV 2.2%, EBV 0.8% and adenovirus 0.3%). There were no significant differences between FN episodes with and without viraemia in terms of duration of fever or neutropenia/lymphopenia, severity of mucositis (> II0), incidence of diarrhea and ICU admission. Our results indicate that viraemia in paediatric cancer patients generally does not have a major clinical impact, and may help in the decision regarding the indication of routine evaluation for viraemia in febrile neutropenic, but otherwise asymptomatic children.

Comparison of two non-invasive body temperature measurement methods for the detection of febrile neutropenia in children with cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to compare the accuracy of two noninvasive thermometers (axillary and infrared non-contact forehead thermometer) in measuring core temperature compared to the gold standard oral thermometer in the detection of fever in pediatric cancer patients with febrile neutropenia. METHODS: The study was conducted with a single group of 42 children with febrile neutropenia between 23 December 2020 and 25 January 2023 in the pediatric hematology and oncology clinic of a training and research hospital, which provides a specialized environment for both medical education and advanced scientific research in the field of pediatric hematology and oncology. The participants' body temperature was measured with an oral, axillary, and non-contact infrared forehead thermometer immediately after admission to the clinic and at 5 and 10 min after admission. The inter-rater agreement for each method and inter-method agreement between axillary and non-contact infrared temperature readings and oral readings were analyzed for each time point using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: The children in the study had a mean age of 11.62 ± 3.00 years and 28 (66.7%) were boys, 19 (45.2%) were younger children (5-10 years of age), and 23 (54.8%) were adolescents (11-16 years of age). In the analysis of agreement between the thermometers at admission and at 5 and 10 min after admission in children with febrile neutropenia, the highest agreement was between the oral and axillary thermometers (ICC: 0.584, 0.835, 0.536, respectively) and the lowest agreement was between the oral and non-contact infrared thermometers (ICC: 0.219, 0.022, 0.473, respectively). CONCLUSION: Compared to orally measured body temperature, axillary temperature readings showed better agreement than non-contact infrared temperature readings from the forehead in pediatric patients with febrile neutropenia. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The research findings may guide nurses and families caring for pediatric patients with febrile neutropenia and should contribute to the prevention of false findings of fever and the reduction of its adverse consequences.

On-body injector pegfilgrastim for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia prophylaxis: Current Status.

INTRODUCTION: Myelosuppression, a challenge in cancer treatment, often results in severe complications. Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factors, particularly pegfilgrastim, mitigate chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. This narrative review evaluates the role of on-body injector (OBI) devices for pegfilgrastim administration. A comprehensive search strategy of PubMed and AI-powered intuitive search tools, complemented by authors' contributions, yielded a body of papers presenting evidence on OBI devices, their effectiveness and safety, the benefits and challenges of OBI versus pre-filled syringe administration, patient preferences for pegfilgrastim administration, and economic considerations. DISCUSSION: OBI devices prove effective and safe, with advantages such as reduced clinic visits and enhanced adherence. Studies highlight cost-efficiency and expanded access, emphasizing the socioeconomic context. Patient and provider preferences underscore the potential of OBI devices in cancer care, with implications for healthcare resource utilization and pharmacoeconomics. CONCLUSION: The value proposition of OBI devices lies in improving patient outcomes, convenience, resource optimization, and enhancing the overall cancer care experience. As biosimilar OBIs enter the market, they may offer cost savings, further influencing their adoption and their positioning as a cost-efficient alternative in cancer care. Ongoing research and technological advancements are expected to contribute to the broader acceptance of OBI devices in cancer care delivery.

Impact of a Fast Pass on Emergency Department Wait Times for Oncology Patients with Febrile Neutropenia.

This pilot study examined differences in wait times for oncology patients who presented to the emergency department, with or without a Fast Pass, for febrile neutropenia (FN). Inadequate circulating neutrophils create a health risk for FN patients. An increased number of patients are receiving chemotherapy in an outpatient setting and may experience delays when seeking treatment in the emergency department. These delays in treatment may be due to overcrowding, patients who require life-saving medical interventions, and inconsistencies in recognizing febrile neutropenia, where fever may be the only presenting sign. The purpose of this study was to measure the impact on wait times, increasing possible risk of bacterial or viral exposure in the emergency department waiting room, for patients with a potential diagnosis of FN who presented their "Fast Pass" from the hospital cancer center's program upon arrival. Electronic medical records were reviewed over a period of 21 months, comparing wait times in the ED for oncology patients with potential FN before and after implementation of the Fast Pass program at an urban medical center in Hawai'i. Of the 1300 oncology patient chart reviews conducted, 6 patients met the study-defined inclusion criteria pre-Fast Pass and 10 met the study-defined inclusion criteria post-Fast Pass. Influence of the use of a Fast Pass on patient wait times was tested using a multivariate regression adjusted for ED patient volume. There were no differences in overall wait times pre- and post-Fast Pass.

Landscape of Invasive Fusariosis in Pediatric Cancer Patients: Results of a Multicenter Observational Study From Latin America.

Invasive fusariosis (IF) is a life-threatening opportunistic infection that affects vulnerable hosts. We conducted a multicenter and multinational retrospective study to characterize the natural history and clinical management of IF in pediatric cancer patients. We selected patients <18 years old who were sequentially hospitalized in 10 Latin American medical centers with a diagnosis of IF between 2002 and 2021. Data were collected using an electronic case report form complemented by a dictionary of terms. We assessed mortality rates at 30, 60, and 90 days. We collected data from 60 episodes of IF (median age, 9.8 years) that were mostly documented in patients with hematologic cancer (70%). Other risk conditions found were lymphopenia (80%), neutropenia (76.7%), and corticosteroid exposure (63.3%). IF was disseminated in 55.6% of patients. Skin lesions was present in 58.3% of our patients, followed by pulmonary involvement in 55%, sinusitis in 21.7%, bone/joint involvement in 6.7% and 1 case each of endocarditis and brain abscess. Positive blood and skin biopsy cultures were detected in 60% and 48.3% of cases, respectively. Fusarium solani complex was the most commonly identified agent (66.6%). The majority of patients received monotherapy within the first 72 hours (71.6%), either with voriconazole or amphotericin B formulation. The mortality rates at 30, 60, and 90 days were 35%, 41.6%, and 45%, respectively. An important factor affecting mortality rates appears to be disseminated disease. The high percentage of patients with fungal involvement in multiple organs and systems highlights the need for extensive workup for additional sites of infection in severely immunocompromised children.

Clinical impact of a change in antibiotics or the addition of glycopeptide antibiotics for persistent febrile neutropenia after autologous stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: A change in empirical antibiotics or the addition of glycopeptide antibiotics is often applied in cases of persistent febrile neutropenia (FN) despite the administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics. However, the clinical benefit of these approaches remains unclear. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the effectiveness of a change in antibiotics or the addition of glycopeptide antibiotics for persistent FN after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT). We retrospectively reviewed the records of 208 patients who received auto-HCT at our institution between 2007 and 2019. FN that lasted for 4 days or longer was defined as persistent FN. We compared the time to defervescence between patients whose initial antibiotics were changed and/or who additionally received glycopeptide antibiotics, and those without these antibiotic modifications. RESULTS: Among patients who fulfilled the criteria of persistent FN (n = 125), changes in antibiotics were not significantly associated with the time to defervescence in a multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.72, p = 0.27). On the other hand, the addition of glycopeptide antibiotics was paradoxically associated with a delay in defervescence (HR 0.56, p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Although there may be differences in patient backgrounds, no significant differences were observed in either a univariate or multivariate analysis. Since neither a change in antibiotics nor the addition of glycopeptide antibiotics was associated with earlier defervescence in persistent FN after auto-HCT, routine antibiotic modifications might not be necessary in this setting.

Application value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in hematological patients with high-risk febrile neutropenia.

Background: Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a novel non-invasive and comprehensive technique for etiological diagnosis of infectious diseases. However, its practical significance has been seldom reported in the context of hematological patients with high-risk febrile neutropenia, a unique patient group characterized by neutropenia and compromised immune responses. Methods: This retrospective study evaluated the results of plasma cfDNA sequencing in 164 hematological patients with high-risk febrile neutropenia. We assessed the diagnostic efficacy and clinical impact of mNGS, comparing it with conventional microbiological tests. Results: mNGS identified 68 different pathogens in 111 patients, whereas conventional methods detected only 17 pathogen types in 36 patients. mNGS exhibited a significantly higher positive detection rate than conventional methods (67.7% vs. 22.0%, P < 0.001). This improvement was consistent across bacterial (30.5% vs. 9.1%), fungal (19.5% vs. 4.3%), and viral (37.2% vs. 9.1%) infections (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). The anti-infective treatment strategies were adjusted for 51.2% (84/164) of the patients based on the mNGS results. Conclusions: mNGS of plasma cfDNA offers substantial promise for the early detection of pathogens and the timely optimization of anti-infective therapies in hematological patients with high-risk febrile neutropenia.

Early Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Optimizes Teicoplanin Use in Febrile Neutropenic Patients with Hematological Malignancies.

INTRODUCTION: A target trough concentration (Cmin) of teicoplanin ≥ 15-20 mg/L between the fourth and sixth day has been suggested for severe infections or management of febrile neutropenia (FN). Owing to no reports discussing the impact of early target attainment on treatment outcomes, this study aimed to evaluate the dose-Cmin relationship and clinical outcome and estimate the optimal early target Cmin for FN in patients with hematological malignancies. METHODS: This single-center, prospective study enrolled patients with hematological malignancies who were treated with teicoplanin either as an empirical antibiotic for FN or as targeted treatment for Gram-positive bacteria. Blood samples were collected on day three (48 h) post-loading doses, day 5 (96 h), and day 8 (when applicable) and determined by ultrahigh-pressure liquid chromatography-triple quadruple mass spectrometry. A total of 117 samples from 47 patients with FN (27 men, 20 women) were consecutively analyzed. A two-tailed α value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The mean Cmin values at 48 h, 96 h, and on day 8 were 23.4, 21.4, and 27.8 mg/L, respectively. The patients achieving Cmin ≥ 20 mg/L at 48 h had a higher likelihood of treatment success. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.71 for clinical efficacy and the cutoff value of Cmin at 48 h was 18.85 mg/L (95% confidence interval 0.55-0.87; P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: The Cmin of teicoplanin after completion of loading doses could predict the treatment response, with a target concentration ≥ 18.85 mg/L.

Systematic Review of Beta-Lactam vs. Beta-Lactam plus Aminoglycoside Combination Therapy in Neutropenic Cancer Patients.

We performed a systematic review of studies that compared beta-lactams vs. beta-lactams plus aminoglycosides for the treatment of febrile neutropenia in cancer patients. METHOD: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase for studies published up to October 2023, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared anti-Pseudomonas aeruginosa beta-lactam monotherapy with any combination of an anti-Pseudomonas aeruginosa beta-lactam and an aminoglycoside were included. RESULT: The all-cause mortality rate of combination therapy showed no significant differences compared with that of monotherapy (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.16, high certainty of evidence). Infection-related mortality rates showed that combination therapy had a small positive impact compared with the intervention with monotherapy (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.05, high certainty of evidence). Regarding treatment failure, combination therapy showed no significant differences compared with monotherapy (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.03, low certainty of evidence). In the sensitivity analysis, the treatment failure data published between 2010 and 2019 showed better outcomes in the same beta-lactam group (RR 1.10 [95% CI, 1.01-1.19]). Renal failure was more frequent with combination therapy of any daily dosing regimen (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.60, high certainty of evidence). CONCLUSION: We found combining aminoglycosides with a narrow-spectrum beta-lactam did not spare the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Few studies included antibiotic-resistant bacteria and a detailed investigation of aminoglycoside serum levels, and studies that combined the same beta-lactams showed only a minimal impact with the combination therapy. In the future, studies that include the profile of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and the monitoring of serum aminoglycoside levels will be required.

Chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN): healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs in commercially insured patients in the US.

PURPOSE: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a known side effect of chemotherapy, often requiring hospitalization. Economic burden increases with an FN episode and estimates of cost per episode should be updated from real-world data. METHODS: A retrospective claims analysis of FN episodes in patients with non-myeloid malignancies from 2014 to 2021 was performed in IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus database. FN episodes were defined as having same-day claims for neutropenia and fever or infection, plus antibiotic in outpatient settings, following a claim for chemotherapy; index date was defined as the first claim for neutropenia/fever/infection. Patients receiving bone marrow/stem cell transplant and CAR-T therapy were excluded, as were select hematologic malignancies or COVID-19. Healthcare utilization and costs were evaluated and described overall, by episode type (w/wo hospitalization), index year, malignancy type, NCI comorbidity score, and age group. RESULTS: 7,033 FN episodes were identified from 6,825 patients. Most episodes had a hospitalization (91.2%) and 86% of patients had ≥1 risk factor for FN. Overall, FN episodes had a mean (SD) FN-related cost of $25,176 ($39,943). Episodes with hospitalization had higher average FN-related costs versus those without hospitalization ($26,868 vs $7,738), and costs increased with comorbidity score (NCI=0: $23,095; NCI >0-2: $26,084; NCI ≥2: $26,851). CONCLUSIONS: FN continues to be associated with significant economic burden, and varied by cancer type, comorbidity burden, and age. In this analysis, most FN episodes were not preceded by GCSF prophylaxis. The results of this study highlight the opportunity to utilize GCSF in appropriate oncology scenarios.

Leveraging G-CSF prescribing in the outpatient setting: considerations beyond clinical factors-a questionnaire study.

PURPOSE: This study aims to delineate G-CSF treatment practices, assess decision criteria, and measure their implementation in ambulatory settings for patients with breast (BC), lung (LC), or gastrointestinal cancers (GIC), beyond standard recommendations. METHODS: In this non-interventional, cross-sectional, multicenter study, clinical cases were presented using conversational interfaces (chatbots), simulating a conversation with one or more virtual interlocutors through voice or text exchange. The clinical simulations were configured by four parameters: types of cancer, risk of FN related to chemotherapy and comorbidities, access to care, and therapy setting (adjuvant/neoadjuvant/metastatic). RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 102 physicians. Most practitioners (84.5%) reported prescribing G-CSF, regardless of tumor type. G-CSF was prescribed more frequently for adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy than for metastatic cases. The type of chemotherapy was cited as the first reason for prescribing G-CSF, with access to care being the second. Regarding the type of chemotherapy, physicians do not consider this factor alone, but combined with comorbidities and age (56.7% of cases). Pegfilgrastim long-acting was prescribed in most cases of BC and LC (70.1% and 86%, respectively), while filgrastim short-acting was named in the majority of cases of GIC (61.7%); 76.3% of physicians prescribed G-CSF as primary prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that recommended practices are broadly followed. In the majority of cases, G-CSF is prescribed as primary prophylaxis. In addition, physicians seem more inclined to prescribe G-CSF to adjuvant/neoadjuvant patients rather than metastatic patients. Finally, the type of chemotherapy tends to be a more significant determining factor than the patient's background.

Safety of empirical antibiotic therapy discontinuing for fever of unknown origin during high-risk neutropenia in children.

BACKGROUND: ECIL-2021 recommends discontinuing empirical antibiotic therapy (EAT) in febrile-neutropenic children after 72 h of treatment and at least 24-48 h of apyrexia in the case of fever of unknown origin (FUO). These guidelines are rarely applied to high-risk children's neutropenia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively included all consecutive FUO episodes occurring during profound neutropenia ≥ 10 days in children in our institution. We evaluated the safety of EAT discontinuation in patients for whom the ECIL guidelines were followed compared to those for whom they didn't. We used a combined criterion of mortality and intensive care unit admission at 30 days. We identified risk factors for recurrent fever after EAT discontinuation. RESULTS: Fifty-one FUO episodes occurred in 37 patients. EAT discontinuation followed ECIL guidelines in 19 (37 %) episodes. No deaths and-or transfers in ICU occurred in the ECIL group. The duration of EAT was shorter by nine days in the group following ECIL guidelines (p < 0.001). We observed 14 (27 %) episodes of recurrent fever. Mucositis was significantly associated with recurrent fever (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: EAT discontinuation seems feasible and safe in FUO during prolonged febrile neutropenia in children. However, mucosal lesions should prompt thorough surveillance due to the risk of recurrent fever.

Early de-escalation of antibiotic therapy in hospitalized cellular therapy adult patients with febrile neutropenia.

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is an oncologic emergency frequently encountered in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy patients, which requires immediate initiation of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Data regarding antibiotic de-escalation (DE) in neutropenic patients are limited, and guideline recommendations vary. A clinical protocol for antibiotic DE of broad-spectrum agents was implemented if patients were afebrile after 72 hours and had no clinical evidence of infection. The primary endpoint was the difference in the number of antibiotic therapy days between the pre-and post-DE protocol implementation group. Secondary endpoints included rates of subsequent bacteremia during index hospitalization, 30-day mortality, and hospital length of stay. Retrospective chart reviews were conducted to assess outcomes for patients who received allogeneic HCT, autologous HCT, or CAR T-cell therapy under the antibiotic de-escalation protocol (post-DE) compared to those who did not (pre-DE). The pre-DE group underwent HCT/CAR T-cell from February 2018 through September 2018 (n=64), and the post-DE group from February 2019 through September 2019 (n=67). The median duration of antibiotics was significantly lower in the post-DE group (6 days; range 3-60 days) compared to the pre-DE group (8 days; range 3-31 days) (p=0.034). There were no differences in any secondary endpoints. We conclude that antibiotic DE in neutropenic HCT or CAR T-cell therapy patients treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics for at least three days who are afebrile and without documented infection appears to be a safe and effective practice. Adopting it significantly reduces the number of days of antibiotics without compromising patient outcomes.

Therapeutic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with febrile neutropenia: a comprehensive systematic review for clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022 from the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.

BACKGROUND: Febrile neutropenia represents a critical oncologic emergency, and its management is pivotal in cancer therapy. In several guidelines, the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia is not routinely recommended except in high-risk cases. The Japan Society of Clinical Oncology has updated its clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF, incorporating a systematic review to address this clinical question. METHODS: The systematic review was conducted by performing a comprehensive literature search across PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web, focusing on publications from January 1990 to December 2019. Selected studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, and cohort and case-control studies. Evaluated outcomes included overall survival, infection-related mortality, hospitalization duration, quality of life, and pain. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 332 records. Following two rounds of screening, two records were selected for both qualitative and quantitative synthesis including meta-analysis. Regarding infection-related mortality, the event to case ratio was 5:134 (3.73%) in the G-CSF group versus 6:129 (4.65%) in the non-G-CSF group, resulting in a relative risk of 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.27-2.58; p = 0.54), which was not statistically significant. Only median values for hospitalization duration were available from the two RCTs, precluding a meta-analysis. For overall survival, quality of life, and pain, no suitable studies were found for analysis, rendering their assessment unfeasible. CONCLUSION: A weak recommendation is made that G-CSF treatment not be administered to patients with febrile neutropenia during cancer chemotherapy. G-CSF treatment can be considered for patients at high risk.

The effect of leptin gene polymorphisms (LEP rs7799039 and LEPR rs1137101) on febrile neutropenia.

Background and aim: Leptin is mainly produced in adipose tissue and released into systemic circulation. Leptin and its receptor LEPR activate the Janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription signaling cascade and increase cytokine discharge. In our study, we aimed to examine the role of leptin gene (LEP) rs7799039 and LEPR rs1137101 polymorphisms on the susceptibility for febrile neutropenia (FEN) attacks and their relationship with clinical findings during the course of FEN. Methods: This study included pediatric patients with a diagnosis of malignancy who applied to the pediatric emergency department between December 2019 and June 2022 and healthy controls. The genotypes of the LEP rs7799039 and LEPR rs1137101 genes were statistically compared between patients and healthy controls. In addition, the relationship between the genotype distribution of LEP rs7799039 and LEPR rs1137101 polymorphisms and clinical features during the course of FEN was investigated. Results: In the statistical analysis in terms of LEP rs7799039 and LEPR rs1137101 genotype distributions between the patient and healthy groups, there was no significant difference. Patients with the AA genotype of LEPR rs1137101 polymorphism had significantly more commonly a body mass index (BMI) value of <25, and all the patients with the AG/GG genotype had a BMI value of 25 and above. LEP rs7799039 and LEPR rs1137101 genotype distributions were not statistically significant with other clinical features. Conclusions: It was revealed that leptin gene polymorphisms did not have a significant effect during the course of FEN.

Systematic review on efficacy and safety of empirical versus pre-emptive antifungal therapy among children with febrile neutropenia reveals paucity of data.

BACKGROUND: Two approaches are used to manage invasive fungal disease (IFD) in febrile neutropenic patients viz. empirical therapy (without attempting to confirm the diagnosis), or pre-emptive therapy (after screening tests for IFD). OBJECTIVE: This systematic review was undertaken to compare these approaches in children. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, Clinical Trial Registries and grey literature, for randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing empirical versus pre-emptive antifungal therapy in children with FN suspected to have IFD. We used the Cochrane Risk of bias 2 tool for quality assessment, and evaluated the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: We identified 7989 citations. Stepwise screening identified only one relevant RCT that administered empirical (n = 73) or pre-emptive (n = 76) antifungal therapy. There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality (RR 1.56, 95% CI: 0.46, 5.31), IFD mortality (RR 1.04, 95% CI:0.15, 7.20) and other clinically important outcomes such as duration of fever, duration of hospitalization and proportion requiring ICU admission. There were no safety data reported. The number of days of antifungal therapy was significantly lower in the pre-emptive therapy arm. The certainty of evidence for all outcomes was 'moderate'. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review highlighted the paucity of data, comparing empirical versus pre-emptive antifungal therapy in children with febrile neutropenia having suspected invasive fungal disease. Data from a single included trial suggests that both approaches may be comparable in research settings. Robust trials are warranted to address the gap in existing knowledge about the optimal approach in clinical practice.