Factors associated with stunting: gut inflammation and child and maternal-related contributors among under-five children in Hawassa City, Sidama Region, Ethiopia.

BACKGROUND: Under-nutrition remains a major global public health challenge, particularly among children under the age of five. Among the manifestations of under-nutrition, stunting accounts for the larger proportion, which is associated with multiple factors. In Ethiopia, however, the link between intestinal inflammation and childhood stunting was not well investigated. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the association between gut inflammation and childhood stunting. METHOD: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted and a total of 82 children were included in the study. Anthropometric data were collected by measuring weight in underwear and without shoes with an electronic scale to the nearest 0.1 kg and their height in the Frankfort plane with a telescopic height instrument. Environmental risk factors for enteric bacterial exposure, access to improved sources of drinking water, and the presence of facilities for hygiene and sanitation conditions were assessed using a questionnaire. Gut inflammation was tested through fecal leukocyte count and each sample was stained with methylene blue. Stool samples were inoculated on MacConkey agar, Salmonella-Shigella agar, and Xylose Lysine Deoxycholate agar after enrichment with Selenite cystine broth and incubated at 37 °C for 18-24 h. Binary and multiple logistic regressions and Chi-square models were used to analyze the data. RESULT: Data from the current study revealed that gut inflammation was (AOR: 5.28, 95% CI: 1.32-22.25) associated with stunting. On the other hand, children with reported diarrhea within the last week were 6 times more likely for the probability of being stunted (AOR: 6.21, 95% CI: 2.68-26.83). The findings of this study also demonstrated that children from a household with a family size of more than 5 members were three times more likely to be stunted than their counterparts (AOR: 3.21, 95% CI: 1.20 -10.13). Facts of the current study demonstrated that breastfeeding for 24 months and below was negatively associated (AOR: 0.3; 95% CI: -0.46-0.89) with gut inflammation. Detection of E.coli and Shigella species in the stool samples of children and Menaheria residents were positively associated with gut inflammation (AOR: 5.4, 95% CI: 1.32-22.25; AOR: 5, 95% CI: 1.47-24.21), respectively. CONCLUSION: Therefore, there was a strong correlation between stunting and gastrointestinal inflammation. Moreover, stunting was associated with diarrhea, breastfeeding duration, residence, and family size. Similarly, intestinal inflammation was linked to residence, breastfeeding duration, and the prevalence of bacterial infections such as E. coli and Shigella species.

Prevalence of Yersinia enterocolitica Bioserotype 3/O:3 among Children with Diarrhea, China, 2010-2015.

Yersinia enterocolitica is thought to not significantly contribute to diarrheal disease in China, but evidence substantiating this claim is limited. We determined the prevalence of Y. enterocolitica infection and strain types present among children <5 years of age with diarrhea in China. The overall prevalence of pathogenic isolates was 0.59%. Prevalence of pathogenic bioserotype 3/O:3 varied geographically. In this population, the presence of fecal leukocytes was a characteristic of Y. enterocolitica infection and should be used as an indication for microbiological diagnostic testing, rather than for the diagnosis of bacillary dysentery. In contrast with Y. enterocolitica isolates from adults, which were primarily biotype 1A, isolates from children were primarily bioserotype 3/O:3. Most pathogenic isolates from children shared pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns with isolates from pigs and dogs, suggesting a possible link between isolates from animals and infections in children. Our findings underscore the need for improved diagnostics for this underestimated pathogen.

Clinical Significance of Fecal Lactoferrin and Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction in Patients with Acute Diarrhea.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The diagnostic yield of fecal leukocyte and stool cultures is unsatisfactory in patients with acute diarrhea. This study was performed to evaluate the clinical significance of the fecal lactoferrin test and fecal multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in patients with acute diarrhea. METHODS: Clinical parameters and laboratory findings, including fecal leukocytes, fecal lactoferrin, stool cultures and stool multiplex PCR for bacteria and viruses, were evaluated prospectively for patients who were hospitalized due to acute diarrhea. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients were included (male, 23; median age, 42.5 years). Fecal leukocytes and fecal lactoferrin were positive in 33 (61.1%) and 14 (25.4%) patients, respectively. Among the 31 patients who were available for fecal pathogen evaluation, fecal multiplex PCR detected bacterial pathogens in 21 patients, whereas conventional stool cultures were positive in only one patient (67.7% vs 3.2%, p=0.000). Positive fecal lactoferrin was associated with presence of moderate to severe dehydration and detection of bacterial pathogens by multiplex PCR (21.4% vs 2.5%, p=0.049; 100% vs 56.5%, p=0.032, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Fecal lactoferrin is a useful marker for more severe dehydration and bacterial etiology in patients with acute diarrhea. Fecal multiplex PCR can detect more causative organisms than conventional stool cultures in patients with acute diarrhea.

Clinical Significance of Fecal Lactoferrin and Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction in Patients with Acute Diarrhea

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The diagnostic yield of fecal leukocyte and stool cultures is unsatisfactory in patients with acute diarrhea. This study was performed to evaluate the clinical significance of the fecal lactoferrin test and fecal multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in patients with acute diarrhea. METHODS: Clinical parameters and laboratory findings, including fecal leukocytes, fecal lactoferrin, stool cultures and stool multiplex PCR for bacteria and viruses, were evaluated prospectively for patients who were hospitalized due to acute diarrhea. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients were included (male, 23; median age, 42.5 years). Fecal leukocytes and fecal lactoferrin were positive in 33 (61.1%) and 14 (25.4%) patients, respectively. Among the 31 patients who were available for fecal pathogen evaluation, fecal multiplex PCR detected bacterial pathogens in 21 patients, whereas conventional stool cultures were positive in only one patient (67.7% vs 3.2%, p=0.000). Positive fecal lactoferrin was associated with presence of moderate to severe dehydration and detection of bacterial pathogens by multiplex PCR (21.4% vs 2.5%, p=0.049; 100% vs 56.5%, p=0.032, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Fecal lactoferrin is a useful marker for more severe dehydration and bacterial etiology in patients with acute diarrhea. Fecal multiplex PCR can detect more causative organisms than conventional stool cultures in patients with acute diarrhea.

Leucocitos fecales en niños con diarrea aguda: ¿momento de reconsiderar la utilidad clínica de la prueba? / Fecal leukocytes in children with acute diarrhea: time to reconsider the clinical usefulness of the test?

INTRODUCCIÓN. Los leucocitos fecales son utilizados para identificar diarrea invasiva y decidir el uso de antibióticos. Se conoce poco sobre su utilidad en hospitales de países en desarrollo con procesos de laboratorio eficientes. Buscamos evaluar el rendimiento diagnóstico de la prueba en menores de 5 años con diarrea aguda. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS. Estudio retrospectivo de registros clínicos y de laboratorio en el Hospital de Emergencias Pediátricas, Lima, Perú. Se evaluó los casos a los que se había solicitado sistemática e independientemente leucocitos fecales y coprocultivo. Se calculó sensibilidad, especificidad, valores predictivos, cocientes de probabilidad (CP) y la curva de características operativas del receptor (ROC). RESULTADOS. De 1,804 muestras fecales, 901 (49,9%) fueron positivos para uno o más enteropatógenos bacterianos. La sensibilidad (S), especificidad (E), y el CP positivo variaron para los diferentes umbrales: más de 5 leucocitos por campo (S: 93.2%, E: 21.9%, CP: 1.9), más de 20 (S: 88.4%, E: 34.8%, CP: 1.35), más de 50 (S: 74.9%, E: 56.7%, CP: 1.73), y más de 100 (S: 60.7%, E: 71.9%, CP: 2.17). El área bajo la curva ROC fue 0.69 (IC 95%: 0.67-0.72). CONCLUSIONES. El rendimiento de la prueba es sub-óptimo y continuar su uso rutinario en la práctica clínica no parece justificado, pues promueve el abuso de antibióticos y por otro lado aumenta el riesgo de pasar por alto pacientes con diarrea invasiva. Se necesita estudiar el rendimiento diagnóstico de datos epidemiológicos y clínicos combinados con leucocitos fecales o lactoferrina fecal, para identificar una aproximación más eficiente.

INTRODUCTION. Fecal leukocytes are widely used to identify invasive diarrhea and to make then the decision of prescribing or not antibiotics. This test has been hardly assessed in small hospitals of developing countries with efficient laboratory processes. We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of different thresholds of fecal leukocytes in children under-five with acute diarrhea. MATERIAL AND METHODS. Retrospective study of clinical and laboratory records in the Pediatric Emergency Hospital, Lima, Peru. All cases with a stool culture and fecal leukocytes independently and systematically performed were studied. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios (LR), and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were calculated. RESULTS. Out of 1,804 stool samples assessed, 901 (49,9%) were positive for one or more bacterial entheropathogens. Sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), and positive LR varied for different thresholds: more than 5 (S: 93.2%, Sp: 21.9%, LR+:), more than 20 (Sn: %, Sp: %, +LR: ), more than 50 (Sn: 74.9%, Sp: 56.7%, +LR: 1.73), and more than 100 fecal leukocytes per high power field (Sn: 60.7%, Sp: 71.9%, LR+: 2.17). The general area under the ROC curve was 0.69 (CI 95%: 0.67-0.72). CONCLUSIONS. Diagnostic performance of fecal leukocytes is suboptimal and may not warrant its continued use in developing settings, as it promotes antibiotic abuse, and on the other hand increases the risk of overlooking patients with invasive diarrhea who may benefit from antibiotic treatment. Combination of epidemiological and clinical data with either fecal leukocytes or fecal lactoferrin may provide a more efficient approach.

Stool Cultures and Antibiotic Therapy in Cases of Acute Diarrhea

BACKGROUND: Most episodes of acute diarrhea are self-limiting. Most patients require neither a stool culture nor antibiotic therapy. This study was designed to investigate the predictors of a stool-culture positivity and indicators for antibiotic therapy in acute infectious diarrheal patients. METHODS: Medical records of 139 adult cases were retrospectively reviewed during the 12 months between January 1999 and December 1999. We used the Chisquare-test to analyze the data for statistical significance. RESULTS: Fecal leukocytes were examined in 104 cases; 30 tested positive (28.8%). Eighty-five stool cultures were taken, and 24 yielded enteric pathogens, such as Salmonella, Shigella, V. Cholera and V. Parahaemolyticus. Cultures from patients treated between August and October, with fever above 37.6degrees C, or with symptoms of abdominal pain had higher yields(44.2% vs 11.9%, p=0.001, correlation coefficient=0.359; 36.8% vs 10.7%, p=0.012, correlation coefficient=0.273;, 38.1% vs 18.6%, p=0.046, correlation coefficient=0.216 ; respectively) and when combined with fecal leukocytes had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 90.1-95.1%. CONCLUSION: The primary variables (season, fever, and abdominal pain) were excellent predictors of stool culture positivity and indicators for antibiotic therapy, especially when combined with fecal leukocytes