Differential Back Muscle Flexion-Relaxation Phenomenon in Constrained versus Unconstrained Leg Postures.

Previous studies examining the flexion-relaxation phenomenon (FRP) in back muscles through trunk forward flexion tests have yielded inconsistent findings, primarily due to variations in leg posture control. This study aimed to explore the influence of leg posture control and individual flexibility on FRP in back and low limb muscles. Thirty-two male participants, evenly distributed into high- and low-flexibility groups, were recruited. Activities of the erector spinae, biceps femoris, and gastrocnemius muscles, alongside the lumbosacral angle (LSA), were recorded as participants executed trunk flexion from 0° to 90° in 15° increments, enabling an analysis of FRP and its correlation with the investigated variables. The findings highlighted significant effects of all examined factors on the measured responses. At a trunk flexion angle of 60°, the influence of leg posture and flexibility on erector spinae activities was particularly pronounced. Participants with limited flexibility exhibited the most prominent FRP under constrained leg posture, while those with greater flexibility and unconstrained leg posture displayed the least FRP, indicated by their relatively larger LSAs. Under constrained leg posture conditions, participants experienced an approximate 1/3 to 1/2 increase in gastrocnemius activity throughout trunk flexion from 30° to 90°, while biceps femoris activity remained relatively constant. Using an inappropriate leg posture during back muscle FRP assessments can overestimate FRP. These findings offer guidance for designing future FRP research protocols.

Is the disappearance of the cervical flexion-relaxation phenomenon associated with cervical degeneration in healthy people?

PURPOSE: This study aims to explore the differences in cervical degeneration between healthy people with and without cervical flexion-relaxation phenomenon (FRP) and to identify whether the disappearance of cervical FRP is related to cervical degeneration. METHODS: According to the flexion relaxation ratio (FRR), healthy subjects were divided into the normal FRP group and the abnormal FRP group. Besides, MRI was used to evaluate the degeneration of the passive subsystem (vertebral body, intervertebral disc, cervical sagittal balance, etc.) and the active subsystem (deep flexors [DEs], deep extensors [DFs], and superficial extensors [SEs]). In addition, the correlation of the FRR with the cervical degeneration score, C2-7Cobb, Borden method, relative total cross-sectional area (rTCSA), relative functional cross-sectional area (rFCSA), and fatty infiltration ratio (FIR) was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 128 healthy subjects were divided into the normal FRP group (n=52, 40.63%) and the abnormal FRP group (n=76, 59.38%). There were significant differences between the normal FRP group and the abnormal FRP group in the cervical degeneration score (z=-6.819, P<0.001), C2-7Cobb (t=2.994, P=0.004), Borden method (t=2.811, P=0.006), and FIR of DEs (t=-4.322, P<0.001). The FRR was significantly correlated with the cervical degeneration score (r=-0.457, P<0.001), C2-7Cobb (r=0.228, P=0.010), Borden method (r=0.197, P=0.026), and FIR of DEs (r=-0.253, P=0.004). CONCLUSION: The disappearance of cervical FRP is related to cervical degeneration. A new hypothesis mechanism for FRP is proposed. The cervical FRP test is an effective and noninvasive examination for the differential diagnosis of healthy people, people with potential NSNP, and patients with NSNP.

Validación de test de flexión-relajación para definir un déficit lumbar con electrodos tetrapolares / Validation of the flexion-relaxation test to define a lumbar deficit with tetrapolar electrodes

Introducción y objetivo: Obtener un nuevo punto de corte (PC) para un test de flexión-relajación (FR) lumbar efectuado con electrodos (e.) tetrapolares, desde valores ya definidos con dispositivos bipolares.Materiales y métodosLa muestra del estudio consta de 47 pacientes en situación de incapacidad temporal por dolor lumbar (DL). Fueron evaluados mediante un test de dinamometría isométrica, una prueba cinemática y una valoración del fenómeno FR.Se plantean dos experimentos con curvas ROC. El primero, con 47 pacientes que efectuaron de modo consecutivo el test FR con ambos tipos de electrodos, utilizándose como variable de clasificación el punto de corte conocido para los e. bipolares (2,49uV). En el segundo, con los datos de la EMGs registrados con e. tetrapolares en 17 pacientes, se efectúa un test de DeLong que compara las 2 curvas ROC que construimos, por un lado, al clasificar la muestra desde pruebas de dinamometría y cinemática, y por el otro, al clasificarlos con los valores de la EMGs bipolar.ResultadosUn total de 34 pacientes completaron adecuadamente las valoraciones del primer experimento y 17 pacientes el segundo. El primer estudio arroja un punto de corte de 1,2uV, con un AUC del 87,7%; sensibilidad 84,2% y especificidad 80%. El segundo muestra un PC para los e. bipolares de 1,21uV (AUC 87,5%) y para los e. tetrapolares de 1,43 (AUC 82,5%) con un test de DeLong sin diferencias significativas entre ambas curvas (p>0,4065).ConclusionesLa metodología de validación con curvas ROC ha permitido obtener un nuevo PC para la prueba FR de modo práctico, simplemente simultaneando ambos test sobre el mismo grupo de pacientes hasta obtener una muestra significativa. (AU)

Introduction and objective: To obtain a new cut-off point (CP) for a lumbar flexion-relaxation (RF) test established with tetrapolar (e.) electrodes, from values already defined with bipolar devices.Materials and methodsThe study sample consists of 47 patients in a situation of temporary disability due to low back pain (DL). They were evaluated by means of an isometric dynamometry test, a kinematic test and an assessment of the FR phenomenon.Two experiments with ROC curves are proposed. The first, with 47 patients who consecutively performed the RF test with both types of electrodes, using the cut-off point (CP) known for the e. bipolar (2.49μV). In the second, with the EMG data recorded with e. tetrapolar in 17 patients, a DeLong test was performed that compares the 2 ROC curves that were constructed on the one hand, by classifying the sample from dynamometry and kinematic tests, and on the other, by classifying them with the bipolar EMG values.ResultsA total of 34 patients adequately completed the evaluations of the first experiment and 17 patients the second. The first study shows a cut-off point of 1.2μV, with an AUC of 87.7%; Sensitivity 84.2% and Specificity 80%. The second shows a PC for e. bipolars of 1.21μV (AUC 87.5%) and for e. tetrapolar values of 1.43 (AUC 82.5%) with a DeLong test without significant differences between both curves (p>0.4065).ConclusionsThe validation methodology with ROC curves has made it possible to obtain a new PC for the RF test in a practical way, simply by simultaneously performing both tests on the same group of patients until a significant sample is obtained. (AU)

Effects of MLS Laser on pain, function, and disability in chronic non-specific low back pain: A double-blind placebo randomized-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Among non-pharmacological interventions, Multiwave Locked System (MLS) Laser therapy has been used in patients with several musculoskeletal pathologies and in combination with other therapeutical interventions. The effects of sole MLS therapy on pain and function in patients with chronic non-specific low-back pain are unknown. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of MLS Laser therapy on pain, function, and disability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain in comparison to a placebo treatment group. METHODS: Forty-five patients were randomized into two groups: the MLS Laser group and the Sham Laser group, undergoing 8 sessions of either a MLS Laser therapy or a Sham Laser therapy, respectively. At the beginning of the therapy (T0), at the end of the therapy (T1), and 1 month after the end of therapy (T2) patients were assessed for low back pain (by means of a VAS scale), function (by means of kinematic and electromyographic assessment of a forward bending movement) and self-reported disability (by means of the Roland-Morris and Oswestry Disability questionnaires). RESULTS: There was a significant reduction of pain and disability in both groups at T1 and T2 in comparison with T0. At T2 patients in the MLS group showed a significantly lower pain in comparison with patients in the Sham group (VAS = 2.2 ± 2 vs. 3.6 ± 2.4; p< 0.05). No differences between the two groups were found for function and disability. CONCLUSION: Both MLS Laser and Sham Laser therapies lead to a significant and comparable reduction in pain and disability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain. However, one month after treatment, MLS Laser therapy has been found to be significantly more effective in reducing pain as compared to sham treatment.

[Validation of the flexion-relaxation test to define a lumbar deficit with tetrapolar electrodes]. / Validación de test de flexión-relajación para definir un déficit lumbar con electrodos tetrapolares.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: To obtain a new cut-off point (CP) for a lumbar flexion-relaxation (RF) test established with tetrapolar (e.) electrodes, from values already defined with bipolar devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study sample consists of 47 patients in a situation of temporary disability due to low back pain (DL). They were evaluated by means of an isometric dynamometry test, a kinematic test and an assessment of the FR phenomenon. Two experiments with ROC curves are proposed. The first, with 47 patients who consecutively performed the RF test with both types of electrodes, using the cut-off point (CP) known for the e. bipolar (2.49µV). In the second, with the EMG data recorded with e. tetrapolar in 17 patients, a DeLong test was performed that compares the 2 ROC curves that were constructed on the one hand, by classifying the sample from dynamometry and kinematic tests, and on the other, by classifying them with the bipolar EMG values. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients adequately completed the evaluations of the first experiment and 17 patients the second. The first study shows a cut-off point of 1.2µV, with an AUC of 87.7%; Sensitivity 84.2% and Specificity 80%. The second shows a PC for e. bipolars of 1.21µV (AUC 87.5%) and for e. tetrapolar values of 1.43 (AUC 82.5%) with a DeLong test without significant differences between both curves (p>0.4065). CONCLUSIONS: The validation methodology with ROC curves has made it possible to obtain a new PC for the RF test in a practical way, simply by simultaneously performing both tests on the same group of patients until a significant sample is obtained.

Comparison of Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon After Single-Level and Multi-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

BACKGROUND: This prospective cohort study aimed to assess the influence of the number of fused segments in cervical paravertebral muscles by comparing the changes of the cervical flexion relaxation phenomenon (FRP) after single-level versus multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: A total of 115 patients who had undergone ACDF were retrospectively recruited and divided into a 1-level group (n = 44), a 2-level group (n = 40) and a 3- to 4-level group (n = 31). The flexion relaxation experiment was carried out 3 days preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively by surface electromyography (SEMG). Patients were examined using the neck visual analog scale, cervical Japanese Orthopedic Association score, Neck Disability Index, and C2-C7 range of motion (ROM). RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the time-related changes in flexion relaxation ratio (FRR) among the 3 study groups before and after surgery (F = 85.701; P < .001). Thirty-five patients (79.55%) with 1-level ACDF and 11 patients (27.5%) with 2-level ACDF had FRP were restored to normal at 12 months postoperatively; however, only 1 patient (3.33%) had normalized FRP after 3- to 4-level ACDF. There were significant differences in the time-related changes of the normalized SEMG root mean square values in each phase before and after surgery (P = .018, <.001, <.001, and <.001). A significant correlation was found between the changes in C2-C7 ROM and FRR in the 3 study groups (P = .007 for 1 level, P = .003 for 2 levels, and P = .036 for 3-4 levels). CONCLUSIONS: Single-level ACDF contributes to normalizing the FRP of cervical paravertebral muscles, which is not ideally recovered by 2-level ACDF. In contrast, 3- or 4-level ACDF could not normalize the cervical FRP. Our research supports the passive structure hypothesis.

The association between different physical activity levels and flexion-relaxation phenomenon in women: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether the flexion-relaxation phenomenon differs in women with different physical activity levels. METHODS: Seventy-two subjects were recruited for this study. The electromyographic activity of the erector spinae and multifidus muscles was recorded during a flexion task using a surface electromyographic device. The flexion-relaxation and extension-relaxation ratios were calculated. Participants were classified into different physical activity level groups based on their responses to the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. A Welch analysis of variance was conducted to compare the flexion-relaxation ratio and extension-relaxation ratio between groups. RESULTS: A significant difference in the flexion-relaxation and extension-relaxation ratio was observed in both the erector spinae and multifidus muscles between different levels of physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we observed that female participants with high levels of physical activity showed a more pronounced flexion-relaxation phenomenon compared to those with moderate and low levels of physical activity. No significant difference was found between moderate and low physical activity levels. The findings of our study highlight the association between physical activity and the mechanics of the spinal stabilising muscles.

Passive exoskeletons alter low back load transfer mechanism.

Previous studies that tested passive back-support exoskeletons focused only on active low-back tissue. Therefore, this study examines the effect from a passive back-support exoskeleton by investigating changes in the load transfer mechanism between active and passive tissue in the low back. Twelve healthy male participants performed a full range of trunk flexion-extension movements under three conditions-FREE (no exoskeleton), the backX, or the CoreBot exoskeleton-while holding 0 kg, 4 kg, and 8 kg loads. Body kinematics and electromyography were recorded. Results showed that the average muscle activity of the lumbar erector spinae (LES) was significantly reduced while wearing the exoskeletons, with a 5.9%MVC reduction with the backX and a 3.3%MVC reduction with the CoreBot. Earlier occurrence of the flexion-relaxation phenomenon induced by the trunk extension moment of exoskeletons played an important role in reducing LES muscle activity because the LES returned to a relaxed state earlier (EMG-Off: a 3.1° reduction with the backX, and a 1.8° reduction with the CoreBot; EMG-On: a 2.3° reduction with the backX, and a 1.4° reduction with the CoreBot). In addition, the maximum lumbar flexion angle (a 2.2° reduction with the backX and a 1.5° reduction with the CoreBot) showed significant decreases compared to the FREE condition, indicating that exoskeleton use can prevent low-back passive tissue from being fully activated. These results suggested the overall effects of passive back-support exoskeletons in reducing loads on both active and passive tissue in the low back.

Sensitivity and specificity of the flexion and extension relaxation ratios to identify altered paraspinal muscles' flexion relaxation phenomenon in nonspecific chronic low back pain patients.

BACKGROUND: Among the main methods used to identify an altered flexion relaxation phenomenon (FRP) in nonspecific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP), it has been previously demonstrated that flexion relaxation ratio (FRR) and extension relaxation ratio (ERR) are more objective than the visual reference method. OBJECTIVE: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of the different methods used to calculate the ratios in terms of their ability to identify an altered FRP in NSCLBP. METHODS: Forty-four NSCLBP patients performed a standing maximal trunk flexion task. Surface electromyography (sEMG) was recorded along the erector spinae longissimus (ESL) and multifidus (MF) muscles. Altered FRP based on sEMG was visually identified by three experts (current standard). Six FRR methods and five ERR methods were used both for the ESL and MF muscles. ROC curves (with areas under the curve (AUC) and sensitivity/specificity) were generated for each ratio. RESULTS: All methods used to calculate these ratios had an AUC higher than 0.9, excellent sensitivity (>90 %), and good specificity (80-100 %) for both ESL and MF muscles. CONCLUSION: Both FRP ratios (FRR and ERR) for MF and ESL muscles, appear to be an objective, sensitive and specific method for identifying altered FRP in NSCLBP patients.

The Mode of Activity of Cervical Extensors and Flexors in Healthy Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background and Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the activity of bilateral cervical extensors and flexors on the sagittal, frontal, and horizontal planes of healthy adults during motions of the neck in a sitting position, which has not been satisfactorily investigated by surface electromyogram (sEMG). Materialand Methods: We recruited 35 healthy participants (mean ± standard deviation of age, 20.3 ± 2.4). sEMG recordings of the cervical extensors and flexors were performed for a total of nine seconds in three phases: Phase I involved the motion of the neck from the neutral position to the maximum range of motion; Phase II involved maintaining the neck at the maximum range of motion; and Phase III involved the motion of the neck from the maximum range of motion to the neutral position during neck flexion, extension, right and left lateral flexion, right and left rotation, and maintaining the neck in the neutral position. Muscle activities in each motion were normalized as a percentage of maximal voluntary contraction (%MVC) so that the muscles could be compared. Results: The %MVC of the extensors was significantly larger than that of the flexors in the neutral position (p < 0.001). In addition, the %MVCs of the following were significantly larger than the %MVC in the neutral position: the extensors in flexion (p = 0.014) and extension (p = 0.020), the ipsilateral extensors (p = 0.006) and flexors (p < 0.001) in lateral flexion in Phase I; the flexors in flexion (p < 0.001), the extensors in extension (p = 0.010), and the ipsilateral extensors and flexors in lateral flexion (p < 0.001) in Phase II; the extensors and flexors in flexion (p < 0.001), the flexors in extension (p < 0.001), the ipsilateral flexors (p < 0.001), the contralateral flexors (p = 0.004) and the contralateral extensors (p = 0.018) in lateral flexion in Phase III; and the bilateral extensors and contralateral flexors during rotation in all three phases (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The typical sEMG activities of the extensors and flexors during motion of the neck in healthy adults were identified in this study; this information can be used to understand the pathophysiology of non-specific neck pain and to provide an index for evaluating the effect of treatment.

Comparison of flexion relaxation phenomenon between female yogis and matched non-athlete group.

BACKGROUND: Trunk flexion is a common exercise during daily activities. Flexion relaxation phenomenon (FRP) occurs during forward bending in which there is a sudden silence of erector spinae (ES) muscles. The pattern of forward bending differs in yoga practitioners. This learned pattern probably predisposes yogis to injuries. The hypothesis of this study was that FRP differs in yogis in comparison to non-yogis individuals. METHODS: This observational cross-sectional study was performed on 60 women assigned into yogis and non-athlete groups. Each participant was asked to bend forward and then return to the initial position. ES activity was recorded at L3 level, 4 cm from mid line during the trial. Trunk inclination and lumbar flexion angles were calculated at FRP onset and cessation moments. RESULTS: The FRP occurred in 80% of yoga practitioners in comparison to 96.7% in the control group. Trunk inclination angle was significantly greater at FRP initiation in yogis compared to control group. Lumbar flexion angle was not different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that the altered pattern of forward bending observed in yogis may change patterns of ES muscles activity if it becomes part of a person's daily lifestyle which might predispose these muscles to fatigue and subsequent injuries; however, further studies are warranted for clarification.

The flexion relaxation phenomenon in nonspecific chronic low back pain: prevalence, reproducibility and flexion-extension ratios. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The flexion relaxation phenomenon (FRP) is characterized by the reduction of paraspinal muscle activity at maximum trunk flexion. The FRP is reported to be altered (persistence of spinal muscle activity) in nonspecific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) and is considered a promising biomarker. The aim of this systematic review was to synthetize current knowledge on FRP in the NSCLBP population regarding prevalence, the reliability of FRP measurement using surface electromyography (sEMG), the average value, and variation of the relaxation ratios (RR). METHODS: Five databases were searched (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Sciences, Cochrane Library, Pedro). A qualitative analysis was done for all included studies and meta-analysis studying prevalence, mean value of flexion relaxation ratio (FRR) and extension relaxation ratio (ERR), and difference between asymptomatic and NSCLBP FRR. RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies were included for qualitative analysis and 21 studies for meta-analysis. The prevalence of the altered FRP was 55% (95%CI [32-79%]) in the NSCLBP population. The studies on reliability reported good within-session and between-session reproducibility. In the NSLBP population, the mean FRR was 2.96 (95%CI [2.02; 3.90]) and the mean ERR was 4.07 (95%CI [2.08; 6.07]). The difference between asymptomatic and NSCLBP FRR was - 1.19 (95%CI [- 1.92, - 0.45]). In all meta-analysis, the I2 index was > 80%. CONCLUSION: An altered FRP is frequently found in NSCLBP population using sEMG and the test has a good reproducibility. The difference between asymptomatic and NSCLBP FRR was significant. Nevertheless, considering the high heterogeneity observed, additional research is required to confirm the value of RR.

The relation between the flexion relaxation phenomenon onset angle and lumbar spine muscle reflex onset time in response to 30 min of slumped sitting.

Viscoelastic creep of spine tissue, induced by submaximal spine flexion in sitting, can delay the onset of the flexion-relaxation phenomenon (FRP) and low back reflexes (LBR). Theoretically, these two outcome measures should be correlated; however, no studies have investigated this. This study aims to determine whether 30 min of near-maximal spine flexion will affect the onset of FRP and LBR in the lumbar erector spinae (LS) and lumbar multifidus (LM), and to examine the relation between these parameters. 15 participants were recruited (9F, 6M). Spine angle (between L1 and S2) was monitored synchronously with bilateral muscle activity in the LS (L1) and the LM (L4). FRP onset and LBR were measured in a randomized order before and after 30 min of slouched sitting. No significant difference was found for any muscle LBR onset time between pre and post-sitting (p > 0.05). A significant increase in FRP onset was found in the RLM (p = 0.016) following sitting. No significant correlation was found between the FRP and the LBR for any muscle. These results suggest that the LBR onset might not be as sensitive as an outcome measure to investigate shorter exposures of sitting as FRP.

Inter-joint coordination and the flexion-relaxation phenomenon among adults with low back pain during bending.

BACKGROUND: Altered inter-joint coordination and reduced flexion-relaxation at end-range trunk flexion are common in people with low back pain. Inconsistencies in these behaviors, however, make assessment and treatment challenging for this population. RESEARCH QUESTION: The study objective was to investigate patterns of regional lumbo-pelvic coordination and flexion-relaxation in adults with and without low back pain, during a bending task. METHODS: Adults with low back pain (n = 16) and a healthy group (n = 21) performed three trials of a bending task. Motion capture and surface electromyography systems measured joint kinematics (hip, lower and upper lumbar spine) and muscle activity (erector spinae longissimus, iliocostalis, and multifidus). Continuous relative phase analysis determined inter-joint coordination of the hip/lower lumbar and lower lumbar/upper lumbar joint pairs, during flexion and extension periods. Flexion-relaxation ratios using normalized surface electromyography data determined the extent of flexion-relaxation for each muscle, during each period. For inter-joint coordination, two-way repeated measure mixed ANOVAs calculated the effects of group (healthy/low back pain), period, and their interactions. Separate hierarchical linear models were constructed and tested relationships between flexion-relaxation ratios and our independent variables, group and muscle, while controlling for patient characteristics. RESULTS: The low back pain group had more out-of-phase coordination of the hip/lower lumbar joint pair compared to the healthy group (mean difference = 24.7°; 95 % confidence interval = 3.93-45.4), independent of movement period. No significant between group differences in lower lumbar/upper lumbar coordination were observed. The low back pain group demonstrated reduced flexion-relaxation of all muscles during full flexion (21.7 % reduction on average), with multifidus showing the least relaxation. SIGNIFICANCE: Regional differences in the lumbar spine and the possibility of subgroups with distinct movement pattern should be considered when analyzing coordination in people with low back pain. Multifidus showed the largest changes in flexion-relaxation and should be included when measuring this construct.

Cervical flexion relaxation phenomenon in patients with and without non-specific chronic neck pain.

BACKGROUND: The cervical flexion relaxation phenomenon (FRP) is a myoelectric silence of neck extensor muscles which occurs after a certain degree of flexion. Impaired flexion relaxation can impose the vertebral structures to excessive loading resulting from the persistence of muscular contraction. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the incidence or absence of FRP in cervical erector spinae (CES) and upper trapezius muscles in patients with chronic neck pain (CNP). METHODS: Twenty-five patients with CNP and 25 healthy volunteers were recruited. They accomplished cervical flexion and extension from a neutral position in four phases in the sitting position. The surface electromyography activity of both CES and upper trapezius muscles was recorded in each phase. Cervical flexion and extension movements were simultaneously measured using an electrogoniometer. RESULTS: FRP in CES was observed in 84% and 36% of healthy subjects and CNP patients, respectively. Flexion relaxation ratio (FRR) in CES was lower in CNP patients than in healthy subjects (mean diff = 1.33; 95% CI: 0.75-1.91) (P< 0.001). Only in CNP patients, FRR in right erector spinea was significantly higher than that in the left erector spinea (P= 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: FRP incidence in CNP patients was less than in healthy subjects. Moreover, this phenomenon begins later in CNP patients than in healthy subjects indicating prolonged activity of CES muscles during flexion in the CNP group. The difference between FRR in the right and left sides of erector spinea muscles can result in CNP.

A Comparison Study of Posture and Fatigue of Neck According to Monitor Types (Moving and Fixed Monitor) by Using Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon (FRP) and Craniovertebral Angle (CVA).

This study quantified the neck posture and fatigue using the flexion relaxation phenomenon (FRP) and craniovertebral angle (CVA); further, it compared the difference between the level of fatigue and neck posture induced by two types of monitors (regular fixed monitor and moving monitor). Twenty-three male participants were classified into two groups-the low-flexion relaxation ratio (FRR) group and the normal-FRR group, depending on the FRR value. All participants performed a document task for 50 min using both types of monitors. It was found that the FRR values significantly decreased after the documentation task. The CVA analysis showed that the moving monitor's frequency of forward head posture (FHP) was lower than that for the fixed monitor. Overall, the moving monitor worked better than the fixed monitor; this can be interpreted as proof that such monitors can reduce neck fatigue.

Data acquired by wearable sensors for the evaluation of the flexion-relaxation phenomenon.

The relationship between flexibility and the pattern formed by the surface electromyography activity of the back muscles while performing a dynamic trunk flexion-extension task is not yet thoroughly understood, although many previous studies have adopted it as their focus in the literature. Additionally, several studies have proposed technologies and algorithms to analyse the flexion-relaxation phenomenon, which is defined by myoelectric silence that occurs when the subject's torso exceeds a certain flexion angle. Before participating in the flexion-relaxation test, subjects involved in the data collection underwent medical examinations, in which their physical condition, perceived pain, and level of disability were reported in their anamnesis. During the flexion-relaxation test, which was conducted with 25 subjects with and without low back pain, subjects wore four surface electromyography electrodes positioned over the back muscles, as well as an inertial sensor to estimate trunk inclination.

[The lumbar flexion-relaxation phenomen as a diagnostic test in assessment of lumbar impairment. Sensitivity and specificity]. / El fenómeno de flexión-relajación lumbar como test diagnóstico en la evaluación de un déficit lumbar. Sensibilidad y especificidad.

OBJECTIVE: To define the role of the flexion-relaxation phenomenon (FRP), assessed through ratios (FRR), as a diagnostic test to define impairment in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). MATERIAL AND METHOD: The study sample consisted of 180 participants (16 healthy volunteers and 164 patients on work disability due to CLBP), who were consecutively referred for evaluation at the Biomechanics Laboratory of a workplace accident insurance company from January 2012 to December 2017. The evaluations consisted of an isometric dynamometry test, a kinematic test and assessment of the FRP phenomenon. Minimum criteria were established in the performance of the tests for their acceptance as valid for the study. Lumbar impairment or clinical recovery was defined on the basis of the results of the dynamometry and kinematic tests. The FRP response was assessed with FRRs. A total of 4 different ratios were taken for analysis with ROC curves. RESULTS: A total of 86 valid tests were obtained (16 classified as lumbar impairment and 71 as recovered cases). The best ratio obtained an area under the ROC curve of 0.87, with a sensitivity of 0.84, a specificity of 0.87, and a positive predictive value of 97%. CONCLUSIONS: The FRP test, along with dynamometry and kinematic evaluations, is effective in identifying lumbar impairment and is the easiest test for patients with CLBP to perform.

Effectiveness of lumbar supports in low back functionality and disability in assembly-line workers.

Low back pain (LBP) is a common problem in manufacturing workers. Several strategies have been proposed in order to reduce the pain and/or improve functionality. Among them, lumbar supports are a common solution prescribed for lumbar pain relief. Most of the studies in the literature only consider subjective sensations of the workers for evaluation assessment. This study applies biomechanical tests (a flexion-relaxation test and a functional movement evaluation test) to analyse the effectiveness of flexible lumbar supports in functionality and disability versus placebo intervention, consisting of kinesiotape placed on the low back without any stress. 28 workers participated in the study, randomised in control and intervention groups with a two months' intervention. None of the biomechanical tests showed statistical differences in between-groups pre-post changes. No benefits of wearing a flexible lumbar support during the workday have been found in these assembly-line workers versus placebo intervention.

Short-Term Effects of Kinesio Taping® on Electromyographic Characteristics of Paraspinal Muscles, Pain, and Disability in Patients With Lumbar Disk Herniation.

Context: Kinesio taping® (KT) is a therapeutic modality frequently used in the clinical practice for the treatment of various musculoskeletal disorders. It is often applied in patients with chronic low back pain to decrease pain and improve functional capacity. However, it is not known, whether thoracolumbar fascia KT technique can decrease back pain, restore normal activity of paraspinal muscles, and improve functional capacity in patients with lumbar disk herniation (LDH). Objective: To evaluate the impact of 7-day new KT stabilizing application on lumbar paraspinal muscles function, pain perception, and disability in patients with LDH. Design: A randomized controlled trial. Setting: Human Performance Laboratory. Patients: A number of 38 patients with LDH were randomized into KT (n = 19) and placebo taping (n = 19) groups. Interventions: Both groups received the same "x" type application running over the back along fibers of superficial lamina of the posterior layer of thoracolumbar fascia. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measures were flexion-relaxation and extension-relaxation ratios calculated from electromyographic activity of lumbar multifidus and longissimus thoracic muscles. Pain intensity rating (Quadruple Visual Analogue Scale), pressure pain thresholds of the lower back, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire score, back extension force, and flexion range of motion (ROM) were among secondary outcomes. Results: KT application did not affect the lumbar multifidus and longissimus thoracic muscles flexion-relaxation and extension-relaxation ratios, lower back pressure pain thresholds, back flexion ROM, and back extension force (no group × time interaction [GTI]). KT and placebo taping comparably decreased disability level (time effect: F1,36 = 22.817, P < .001; GTI: F1,36 = 0.189, P = .67), average pain (time effect: F1,36 =39.648, P < .001; GTI: F1,36 = 2.553, P = .12), and the worst pain (time effect: F1,36 = 36.039, P < .001; GTI: F1,36 = 0.003, P = .96) intensity. Conclusion: Seven-day KT does not normalize lumbar paraspinal muscle function and is not superior to placebo in reducing disability and pain intensity in patients with LDH.