The difference in early trimester fetal growth between singletons after frozen embryo transfer and fresh embryo transfer.

BACKGROUND: Frozen embryo transfer resulted in a higher birthweight and an increased risk of macrosomia than fresh embryo transfer. However, the mechanism was still unclear. When the impact of frozen embryo transfer on fetal growth began was unknown. Crown-rump length at 11-13 weeks had been regarded as a good indicator of fetal growth in the first trimester and had been used for gestational age calculation in women with uncertain last menstrual periods. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between frozen embryo transfer and early fetal growth, particularly the crown-rump length, then fresh embryo transfer. The secondary objective was to investigate the potential correlation between crown-rump length and birthweight. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at the Reproductive Medical Center of Shandong University. A total of 4949 patients who obtained singleton pregnancy after frozen embryo transfer and 1793 patients who got singleton pregnancy after fresh embryo transfer between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2022 were included. The primary outcome was the crown-rump length measured via ultrasound at 11-13 weeks gestation. The secondary outcomes were perinatal outcomes, including birthweight and the risk of large for gestational age, small for gestational age, macrosomia, low birthweight, and premature delivery. Multivariable linear regression models were used to adjust for potential confounders of crown-rump length. RESULTS: A total of 6742 live singleton births after frozen embryo transfer or fresh embryo transfer were included in this study. In the univariable analysis, the frozen embryo transfer group had a larger crown-rump length (5.75±0.53 cm vs 5.57±0.48 cm, P<.001) and an increased risk of larger-than-expected crown-rump length (13.5% vs11.2%, P=.013) than the fresh embryo transfer group. After adjusting for confounders in multivariable linear regression models, frozen embryo transfer was still associated with a larger crown-rump length (regression coefficient, 3.809 [95% confidence intervals, 3.621-3.997], P<.001). When subgrouped by fetal gender, the crown-rump length of the frozen embryo transfer group was larger than the fresh embryo transfer group in both male and female fetuses. In addition, the crown-rump length was consistently larger in the frozen embryo transfer group than the fresh embryo transfer group in subgroups of the peak estradiol levels. The comparisons among different crown-rump length groups showed that smaller-than-expected crown-rump length was associated with increased risks of small for gestational age (6.3% vs 3.0%, P<.001) and preterm delivery (9.6% vs 6.7%, P=.004) than normal crown-rump length. CONCLUSION: Frozen embryo transfer was associated with a larger crown-rump length than fresh embryo transfer, suggesting that the effect of frozen embryo transfer on fetal growth may begin in the early trimester. Suboptimal fetal growth in the first trimester may be associated with low birthweight and premature delivery.

An appraisal of current embryo transfer strategies.

Embryo transfer, one of the most essential procedures in assisted reproductive technology, plays a vital role in the success of in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. During the last decades, the strategies for embryo transfer have changed dramatically. In this review, we evaluate the efficacy and safety of several current embryo transfer strategies including fresh versus frozen embryo transfer, cleavage- versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer, and single- versus double-embryo transfer. Available evidence indicates that the freeze-only strategy improves the live birth rate after the first embryo transfer in high responders while making no difference in normal responders. The risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is significantly reduced in the freeze-only strategy. Fresh blastocyst-stage embryo transfer increased live birth rate compared to cleavage-stage embryo transfer. The best embryo transfer strategy is one which tailors to individual circumstances and preferences.

One Plus One is Better than Two: An Approach Towards a Single Blastocyst Transfer Policy for All IVF Patients / Um mais um é melhor que dois: Uma abordagem pela prática da transferência de embrião único para todos os pacientes de FIV

Abstract Objective It is known that the single embryo transfer (SET) is the best choice to reduce multiples and associated risks. The practice of cryopreserving all embryos for posterior transfer has been increasingly performed for in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients at the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome or preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. However, its widespread practice is still controverse. The aim of this study was to evaluate how effective is the transfer of two sequential SET procedures compared with a double embryo transfer (DET) in freeze-only cycles. Methods This retrospective study reviewed 5,156 IVF cycles performed between 2011 and 2019, and 506 cycles using own oocytes and freeze-only policy with subsequent elective frozen-thawed embryo transfers (eFET) were selected for this study. Cycles having elective SET (eSET, n = 209) comprised our study group and as control group we included cycles performed with elective DET (eDET, n = 291). In the eSET group, 57 couples who had failed in the 1st eSET had a 2nd eFET, and the estimated cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate was calculated and compared with eDET. Results After the 1st eFET, the ongoing pregnancy rates were similar between groups (eSET: 35.4% versus eDET: 38.5%; p =0.497), but the estimated cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate after a 2nd eFET in the eSET group (eSET + SET) was significantly higher (48.8%) than in the eDET group (p < 0.001). Additionally, the eSET +SET group had a 2.7% rate of multiple gestations, which is significantly lower than the eDET group, with a 30.4% rate (p < 0.001). Conclusion Our study showed the association of freeze-only strategy with until up to two consecutive frozen-thawed eSETs resulted in higher success rates than a frozenthawed DET, while drastically reducing the rate of multiple pregnancies.

Resumo Objetivo Sabe-se que a transferência de embrião único (SET) é a melhor escolha para reduzir as gestações múltiplas e riscos associados. A prática da criopreservação de todos os embriões para transferência posterior tem sido cada vez mais utilizada para fertilização in vitro (FIV), em especial quando há risco de síndrome de hiperestimulação ovariana ou realização de teste genético pré-implantacional. Entretanto, sua utilização disseminada ainda é controversa. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a eficácia de duas SET sequenciais em comparação com uma transferência de embrião dupla (DET) em ciclos de FIV onde todos os embriões foram criopreservados. Métodos Neste estudo retrospectivo foram revisados 5.156 ciclos de FIV realizados entre 2011 e 2019, e 506 ciclos usando oócitos próprios e criopreservação de todos os embriões com transferências eletivas subsequentes de embriões descongelados, foram selecionados para este estudo. Ciclos com transferência eletiva de embrião único (eSET, n = 209) compuseram nosso grupo de estudo e como grupo de controle incluímos os ciclos com transferência eletiva de dois embriões (eDET, n = 291). No grupo eSET, 57 casais que falharam na 1ª tentativa de eSET tiveram uma 2ª eFET e a taxa de gravidez em curso cumulativa foi estimada para o grupo eSET e comparada com o grupo eDET. Resultados Após a 1ª eFET, as taxas de gravidez em curso foram semelhantes entre os grupos (eSET: 35,4% versus eDET: 38,5%; p = 0,497), mas a taxa de gravidez em curso cumulativa estimada após a 2ª eFET no grupo eSET (eSET + SET) foi significativamente maior (48,8%) do que no grupo eDET (p <0,001). Além disso, as taxas de gestação múltipla foram expressivamente inferiores no grupo eSET + SET (2,7%) quando comparado ao grupo eDET (30,4%; p < 0,001). Conclusão Nosso estudo mostrou que a associação das estratégias de congelamento de todos os embriões com até duas eSETs sequenciais resultou em maiores taxas de sucesso do que uma DET com embriões descongelados, além de reduzir drasticamente a ocorrência de gestações múltiplas.

The sex-specific difference in singleton birth weight after frozen embryo transfer compared with fresh embryo transfer: a secondary analysis of 3 randomized trials.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the between-group difference in singleton birth weight following frozen vs. fresh embryo transfer varied with infant sex. DESIGN: A post hoc exploratory secondary analysis of data from three multicenter randomized trials compared the live birth rates between freeze-only vs. fresh embryo transfer. SETTING: Academic fertility centers. PATIENT(S): A total of 1,886 women who achieved singleton live birth after a frozen or fresh embryo transfer during these trials were included. INTERVENTION(S): Women underwent either a frozen or fresh embryo transfer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Mean birth weight, large for gestational age (LGA), and small for gestational age (SGA). RESULT(S): There was an interaction between the types of embryo transfer and infant sex on the birth weight and on the incidences of LGA and SGA. Among male infants, compared with singletons following fresh embryo transfer, singletons following frozen embryo transfer had higher mean birth weights (3,520.6 ± 526.1 vs. 3,345.1 ± 524.9 g), a higher risk of being LGA (25.2% vs. 15.7%), and a lower risk of being SGA (3.3% vs. 6.1%). However, among the female infants, no statistically significant difference was found in the mean birth weight (3,336.5 ± 514.8 vs. 3,299.5 ± 485.0 g) or the risks of being LGA (18.8% vs. 15.7%) or SGA (5.2% vs. 6.0%) between frozen and fresh embryo transfer. CONCLUSION(S): Male singletons born after frozen embryo transfer were more likely to have a higher birth weight than those born after fresh embryo transfer.

Blastocyst age, expansion, trophectoderm morphology, and number cryopreserved are variables predicting clinical implantation in single blastocyst frozen embryo transfers in freeze-only-IVF.

PURPOSE: To determine which blastocyst assessment variables predict clinical implantations in single blastocyst frozen embryo transfers (FET) of freeze-only-IVF cycles, following improved vitrified-warmed blastocyst survival and developmental competence preservation. METHOD: In this retrospective cohort study performed at a single private IVF center, the pregnancy outcomes of 1795 single blastocyst FET cycles were analyzed, from freeze-only-IVF retrievals performed between January 2017 and January 2020. Stepwise forward logistic regressions with clinical implantation (i.e., normal gestational sac and cardiac activity) as dependent variable were performed to identify the significant predictors. All blastocysts were vitrified using Cryotop technology, with before transfer (post-warming) blastocyst morphology scores used in all analyses. RESULT(S): The 1795 blastocysts transferred were vitrified on embryo days 4 (1057), 5 (716), and 6 (22). The overall clinical implantation rate was 50.9%; however, using blastocyst age and blastocyst morphological score the clinical implantation rates increased from 49.0% (day-4 1 and 2) and 25.2% (day-5 1 and 2) to 71.2% (day-4 4AA) and 64.3% (day-5 4AA), respectively. Whereas full (≥3) blastocysts with scores of AA and BA had similar clinical implantation rates (66.2 vs. 66.7%), the rate of full blastocysts with scores of AB was lower (58.9%). In stepwise forward logistic regressions, female age, blastocyst age, blastocyst expansion score, blastocyst trophectoderm score, and number of blastocysts vitrified were significant predictors of clinical implantation. CONCLUSION(S): Using blastocyst age and before transfer blastocyst expansion and trophectoderm morphology scores to select blastocysts, clinical implantation rates greater than 70% could be achieved for top-scoring blastocysts.

Should we still offer elective freezing of all embryos in all IVF cycles?

Elective 'freeze all', also called 'freeze only', refers to an IVF cycle where all embryos are frozen for later embryo transfer in a non-stimulated cycle, with the promise of increased success rates and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in most patients. However, 'freeze all' is associated with significantly higher perinatal complications including eclampsia, preeclampsia, chronic hypertension and large-for-gestational-age infants, without the demonstrated advantages of providing better results, except for a decrease in the incidence of OHSS, which should matter to women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and high responders to ovarian stimulation but not to all patients. 'Freeze all' is also suggested for all simulated IVF cycles, due to the alleged 'faulty endometrium' caused by ovarian stimulation. However, there is no direct evidence that asynchronous endometrium exists, and only if preovulatory progesterone level increase, can 'freeze all' confer an advantage. We conclude that an alleged diagnosis of 'faulty endometrium' should not be used as an indication for 'freeze all'. To offset the risk of OHSS more simply, less costly and less risky solutions such as mild ovarian stimulation, to dampen the number of oocytes and to aim for transfer of a single blastocyst, should be the preferred solution to treat women with PCOS and high responders for oocyte retrieval.

Live birth after a freeze-only strategy versus fresh embryo transfer in three randomized trials considering progesterone concentration.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is there a difference in live birth rate between a freeze-only strategy and fresh embryo transfer, and what is the effect of varying progesterone concentrations on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration? DESIGN: A secondary analysis of data from three randomized trials comparing the live birth rate after elective frozen versus fresh embryo transfer, which respectively enrolled 1508 women with polycystic ovary syndrome, 2157 ovulatory women who underwent cleavage-stage embryo transfer and 1650 ovulatory women who underwent single blastocyst transfer. Women were randomly assigned to the frozen or fresh embryo transfer group in the original trials. The primary outcome was live birth rate after the initial embryo transfer. RESULTS: The live birth rate after a freeze-only strategy was consistently higher than fresh embryo transfer at any progesterone concentration on the day of HCG administration. Nonetheless, the between-group difference in live birth rate after frozen versus fresh embryo transfer was greater in women with progesterone concentrations ≥1.14 ng/ml (52.7% versus 37.3%, odds ratio (OR) 1.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.55-2.27, P = 7.89 â€¯×  10-11) than in women with progesterone concentrations <1.14 ng/ml (53.3% versus 48.1%, OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.08-1.41, P = 0.002). In women with progesterone concentration ≥1.14 ng/ml, frozen embryo transfer also resulted in higher rates of conception and clinical pregnancy than fresh embryo transfer. CONCLUSION: In women with normal or high ovarian response, a freeze-only strategy resulted in a higher live birth rate than fresh embryo transfer, irrespective of progesterone concentration. Moreover, women with progesterone concentration ≥1.14 ng/ml may benefit more from a freeze-only strategy.

High implantation and clinical pregnancy rates with single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer and optional aneuploidy testing for all patients.

This study reports the results of a 2-year long IVF programme ('One by One') in which all patients (median age 40 years; range 27-45 years) were offered preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) and had all blastocysts vitrified (freeze-only), followed later by single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (vSET) in managed cycles. Between January 2016 and December 2017, a total of 155 patients started 222 treatment cycles and 99 (45%) cycles resulted in one or more vitrified blastocysts (untested or with normal copy number for all chromosomes) available for transfer. Seventeen patients (11%) aged ≤35 years opted out of PGT-A. Over this period, 85 vSETs in 74 patients resulted in an implantation rate of 80% (68/85) and a singleton clinical pregnancy rate of 66% (56/85). Cumulative live birth rates will not be known for 1-2 years. Nevertheless, these high success rates with vSET confirm larger studies using selected patients and are likely to deliver similar, if not higher, live birth rates per cycle started than rates typically reported in national registries with conventional IVF and transfer of one or more fresh and/or frozen embryos.

Cumulative live birth rates following a 'freeze-all' strategy: a population-based study.

STUDY QUESTION: What is the cumulative live birth rate following a 'freeze-all' strategy compared with a 'fresh-transfer' strategy? SUMMARY ANSWER: The 'freeze-all' strategy resulted in a similar cumulative live birth rate as the 'fresh-transfer' strategy among high responders (>15 oocytes retrieved) but did not benefit normal (10-15 oocytes) and suboptimal responders (<10 oocytes). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Frozen-thawed embryo transfer is associated with a decreased risk of adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes compared with fresh embryo transfer. It is unclear whether the 'freeze-all' strategy should be offered to all women undergoing ART treatment. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: A population-based retrospective cohort study using data collected by the Victorian Assisted Reproductive Treatment Authority. This study included 14 331 women undergoing their first stimulated ART cycle with at least one oocyte fertilised between 1 July 2009 and 30 June 2014 in Victoria, Australia. Demographic characteristics, type of ART procedures and resulting pregnancy and birth outcomes were recorded for the stimulated cycle and associated thaw cycles until 30 June 2016, or until a live birth was achieved, or until all embryos from the stimulated cycle had been used. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS: Women were grouped by whether they had undergone the 'freeze-all' strategy (n = 1028) where all embryos were cryopreserved for future transfer, or the 'fresh-transfer' strategy (n = 13 303) where selected embryo(s) were transferred in the stimulated cycle, and remaining embryo(s) were cryopreserved for future use. A discrete-time survival model was used to evaluate the cumulative live birth rate following 'freeze-all' and 'fresh-transfer' strategy. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 1028 women undergoing 'freeze-all' strategy and 13 303 women undergoing 'fresh-transfer' strategy had 1788 and 22 334 embryo transfer cycles resulting in 452 and 5126 live births, respectively. Most women (61.3%) in the 'freeze-all' group had more than 15 oocytes retrieved in the stimulated cycle compared with 18.1% of women in the 'fresh-transfer' group (P < 0.001). For high responders (>15 oocytes), the cumulative live birth rate in the 'freeze-all' group was similar to the 'fresh-transfer' group (56.8% vs. 56.2%, adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 0.90, 95% CI 0.77-1.04). However, the likelihood of a live birth was lower in the 'freeze-all' group compared with the 'fresh-transfer' group among normal responders (10-15 oocytes) (33.2% vs. 46.3%, AHR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46-0.83) and suboptimal responders (<10 oocytes) (14.6% vs. 28.0%, AHR 0.67, 95% CI 0.14-1.01). During the minimum follow-up time of 2 years, 34.1%, 24.4% and 8.4% of suboptimal, normal and high responders, respectively, in the 'freeze-all' group did not return for any embryo transfer after the stimulated cycle, whereas all women in the 'fresh-transfer' group had at least one embryo transferred in the stimulated cycle. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: A limitation of this population-based study is the lack of information available on clinic-specific protocols for the 'freeze-all' strategy and the potential impact of these on outcomes. Data were not available on whether the 'freeze-all' strategy was used to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This study presents population-based evidence on clinical efficacy associated with a 'freeze-all' and 'fresh-transfer' strategy. The 'freeze-all' strategy may benefit some subgroups of patients, including women who are high responders and those who are at risk of OHSS, but should not be offered universally. Clinicians should consider the potential impact of electively deferring embryo transfer on treatment discontinuation in choosing the optimal embryo transfer strategy for couples undergoing ART treatment. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: No specific funding was received to undertake this study. There is no conflict of interest, except that M.B. is a shareholder in Genea Ltd.

Live birth rates with a freeze-only strategy versus fresh embryo transfer: secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the roles of serum progesterone and endometrial thickness as biomarkers in the decision between a freeze-only and fresh embryo transfer in IVF for women without polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)? DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial including 782 couples who were followed up until the end of the first completed cycle. Couples scheduled for their first or second IVF cycle with a FSH/gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol were randomized to a freeze-only (n = 391) or fresh embryo transfer (n = 391) strategy. The endpoint for this analysis was live birth rate (LBR) after the first embryo transfer. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in LBR after the first cycle between a freeze-only and fresh transfer strategy. When serum progesterone levels at trigger were in the third quartile (Q3, 1.14-1.53 ng/ml), LBR was significantly higher in the freeze-only versus fresh transfer group (P = 0.01); when serum progesterone was ≥1.14 ng/ml, LBR was significantly better in the freeze-only group (37.4% versus 23.8% in the fresh transfer group; P = 0.004). LBRs in the freeze-only and fresh embryo transfer groups were similar across all quartiles of endometrial thickness, although a small advantage for freeze-only in women with a very thin endometrium could not be excluded. CONCLUSIONS: Serum progesterone level on the day of trigger may have potential as a biomarker on which to base a prospective decision about whether to use a freeze-only or fresh embryo transfer strategy in women undergoing IVF.

Higher probability of live-birth in high, but not normal, responders after first frozen-embryo transfer in a freeze-only cycle strategy compared to fresh-embryo transfer: a meta-analysis.

STUDY QUESTION: Does the outcome of the comparison of live birth rates between the first frozen embryo transfer (ET) (in a freeze-only cycles strategy, i.e. frozen ET group) and a fresh embryo transfer (fresh ET group) differ considering the type of ovarian response? SUMMARY ANSWER: Α significantly higher probability of live birth is present in high, but not normal, responders, after the first frozen ET in a freeze-only cycle strategy as compared to a fresh ET. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: It has been hypothesised that freezing all good embryos in a fresh in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycle and deferring embryo transfer in subsequent cycles may provide a more physiological endometrial environment for embryo implantation when compared to a fresh ET. However, currently, three relevant meta-analyses have been published with conflicting results, while none of them has taken into consideration the type of ovarian response. Recently, the publication of additional, large relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with different types of ovarian response makes possible the comparative evaluation of the first frozen ET (in a freeze-only cycle strategy) versus fresh ET, considering the type of ovarian response. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed aiming to identify RCTs comparing the first frozen ET (in a freeze-only cycle strategy) to a fresh ET. The main outcome was live birth, while secondary outcomes included ongoing pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, moderate/severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and miscarriage. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: We identified eight eligible RCTs, including 5265 patients, which evaluated the first frozen ET in a freeze-only cycle strategy versus a fresh ET either in high responders (n = 4) or in normal responders (n = 4). No relevant RCTs were present in poor responders. Meta-analysis of weighted data using fixed and random effects model was performed. Results are reported as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Eligible RCTs were published between 2011 and 2018. Four RCTs (n = 3255 patients) compared the first frozen ET (in a freeze-only cycle strategy) to a fresh ET in normal responders and four RCTs (n = 2010 patients) did the comparison in high responders. In high responders, a significantly higher probability of live birth was observed in the frozen ET group when compared with the fresh ET group (RR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.06-1.31; fixed effects model; heterogeneity: I2 = 0%; three studies; n = 3398 patients). However the probability of live birth was not significantly different between the frozen ET group and the fresh ET group in normal responders (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.90-1.41; random effects model; heterogeneity: I2 = 77%; three studies; n = 1608 patients). The risk of moderate/severe OHSS was significantly lower in the frozen ET group when compared with the fresh ET group both in high (RR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.10-0.37; fixed effects model; heterogeneity: not applicable; a single study; n = 1508 patients) and normal responders (RR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.19-0.80; fixed effects model; heterogeneity: I2 = 0%; two studies; n = 2939 patients). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Considerable heterogeneity was present among the studies, regarding ovarian stimulation protocols and the triggering signal used for inducing final oocyte maturation as well as the cryopreservation methods, while the quality of evidence was poor for the live birth rate in high responders. Moreover, the analysis did not apply a standard for determining 'high' or 'normal' responders since the type of ovarian response followed the characterisation of populations as reported by the authors of the eligible studies. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: A freeze-only cycle strategy should be the preferred option in high responders since it enhances the probability of live birth, while reducing the chance of moderate/severe OHSS. In normal responders, the same strategy could be applied, in the interest of patient safety or clinic convenience, without compromising the chances of live birth. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external funding was used and there were no competing interests. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018099389.

Progestin-primed milder stimulation with clomiphene citrate yields fewer oocytes and suboptimal pregnancy outcomes compared with the standard progestin-primed ovarian stimulation in infertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Oral progestin has recently been used to prevent premature LH surges in ovarian stimulation, and this progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) is effective and safe in patients with different ovarian reserves. The current data are lacking regarding how to individualize the gonadotropin dose and regimen for women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). A retrospective cohort trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy of progestin-primed milder stimulation with clomiphene citrate (CC) compared to the standard progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol for infertile women with PCOS. METHODS: A total of 220 PCOS women were collected and classified into the study group (HMG 150 IU/d + CC 50 mg/d + MPA 10 mg/d) and control group (HMG 225 IU/d + MPA 10 mg/d). Ovulation was triggered by GnRH agonist 0.1 mg and hCG 1000 IU when dominant follicles matured. Viable embryos were cryopreserved for later transfer. The primary endpoint was the ongoing pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes included the cycle characteristics and the live birth rate. RESULT(S): The study group consumed less HMG (1470.0 ± 360.1 IU vs 1943.8 ± 372.0 IU, P < 0.001) and harvested fewer oocytes than the control group (12.2 ± 7.4 vs 18.2 ± 9.7, P < 0.001). The study group showed a higher mid-follicular LH concentration (4.49 ± 2.49 mIU/ml vs 2.52 ± 2.09 mIU/ml, P < 0.05) but no endogenous LH surge. No between-group difference was found in the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (0.91% vs 0.91%, P > 0.05). The cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate and live birth rate per patient were lower but did not reach significance compared with the control group (71.8% vs 81.8 and 64.5% vs 75.5%, respectively, both P > 0.05). CONCLUSION(S): The milder PPOS with CC in PCOS women led to lower oocyte yields and suboptimal pregnancy outcomes compared to the standard PPOS treatment. The two regimens both achieved a low incidence of OHSS. The results from the CC combination regimen provide a new insight for developing a more patient-friendly protocol for PCOS women.

Freeze-only versus fresh embryo transfer in a multicenter matched cohort study: contribution of progesterone and maternal age to success rates.

OBJECTIVE: To compare implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates in freeze-only versus fresh transfer cycles. DESIGN: Retrospective matched cohort study. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Women selected using a matching algorithm for similar distributions of clinical characteristics for a total of 2,910 cycles (1,455 fresh cohort and 1,455 freeze-only cohort). INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates. RESULT(S): Implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates were statistically significantly higher in the freeze-only transfer cohort than in the matched fresh transfer cohort: ongoing pregnancy rate for freeze-only was 52.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.4-54.6) and for fresh was 45.3% (95% CI, 42.7-47.9), odds ratio (OR) 1.31 (95% CI, 1.13-1.51). In a stratified analysis, the odds of ongoing pregnancy after freeze-only transfer were statistically significantly higher for women both above and below age 35 with progesterone concentration >1.0 ng/mL (age ≤35: OR 1.38 [1.11-1.71]; age >35: OR 1.73 [1.34-2.24]). For women with progesterone concentration ≤1.0 ng/mL, no statistically significant difference in freeze-only odds of ongoing pregnancy was observed in either age group. The sensitivity analysis revealed that increasing maternal age alone (regardless of progesterone) trended toward a more beneficial effect of freeze-only cycles. A lower progesterone concentration was associated with statistically significantly higher ongoing pregnancy odds for fresh but not freeze-only cycles. CONCLUSION(S): Freeze-only transfer protocols are associated with statistically significantly higher ongoing implantation and pregnancy rates compared with fresh transfer cycles. This effect is most pronounced for cycles with progesterone >1.0 ng/mL at trigger and may also be stronger for older patients.