Minimally invasive approach in a rare emergency surgery, gallbladder perforation.

BACKGROUND: Gallbladder perforations are challenging to manage for surgeons due to their high morbidity and mortality, rarity, and surgical approach. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is now included with open cholecystectomy in surgical managing gallbladder perforations. This study aimed to evaluate the factors affecting conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy in cases of type I gallbladder perforation according to the Modified Niemeier classification. METHODS: Patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into two groups: LC and conversion to open cholecystectomy (COC). Demographic, clinical, radiologic, intraoperative, and postoperative factors were compared between groups. RESULTS: This study included 42 patients who met the inclusion criteria, of which 28 were in the LC group and 14 were in the COC group. Their median age was 68 (55-85) years. Age did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.218). However, the sex distribution did differ significantly between groups (p = 0.025). The location of the perforation differed significantly between groups (p < 0.001). In the LC group, 22 patients were perforated from the fundus, four from the trunk, and two from the neck. In the COC group, two patients were perforated from the fundus, four from the trunk, and eight from the neck. Surgical procedure times differed significantly between the LC (105.0 min [60-225]) and COC (125.0 min [110-180]) groups (p = 0.035). The age of the primary surgeons also differed significantly between the LC (42 years [34-63]) and COC (55 years [36-59]) groups (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LC can be safely performed for modified Niemeier type I gallbladder perforations. The proximity of the perforation site to Calot's triangle, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), and Tokyo classification are factors affecting conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery of gallbladder perforations.

An unusual case of acute cholecystitis complicated by haemobilia and Mirizzi-like obstruction: a case report and review of literature.

Introduction: Cystic artery pseudoaneurysm rupture presents a rare yet potentially fatal aetiology for upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleed. While uncommon, its incidence has been rising with increased hepatobiliary surgical interventions, predominantly attributed to iatrogenic injury and rarely secondary to acute cholecystitis. Clinical manifestations typically include epigastric pain, upper GI haemorrhage, and obstructive jaundice. Due to its rarity, it is often excluded from initial differential diagnoses. Case report: This is an unusual case of a 54-year-old male who presented with acute cholecystitis complicated by haemobilia and Mirizzi-like obstruction, in the setting of cystic artery pseudoaneurysm rupture. Initially, urgent transcatheter angiographic embolization of the cystic artery was performed to achieve hemodynamic stability. However, a triphasic computed tomography (CT) scan revealed the first attempt was unsuccessful, necessitating a second embolization. Subsequent imaging confirmed satisfactory embolization; however, a small area of liver necrosis was observed adjacent to the gallbladder. The patient was stable at discharge from the hospital and had an uncomplicated interval cholecystectomy. Discussion: This case highlights the complexity and challenges associated with diagnosing and managing cystic artery pseudoaneurysm rupture. Diagnosis often relies on arterial phase contrast-enhanced CT scan. While no guideline currently exist, management typically involves achieving hemodynamic stability through Transcatheter angiographic embolization, followed by interval cholecystectomy. Conclusion: Early recognition and intervention are crucial in managing cystic artery pseudoaneurysm rupture to prevent life-threatening haemorrhagic shock. Clinicians need to consider this rare condition in patients with upper GI bleeding and abnormal liver function tests.

Unusual case of Niemeier type II gallbladder perforation: case report and literature review.

Niemeier type II gallbladder perforation (GBP) is caused by inflammation and necrosis of the gallbladder wall followed by bile spilling into the abdominal cavity after perforation. The gallbladder then becomes adhered to the surrounding inflammatory tissue to form a purulent envelope, which communicates with the gallbladder. At present, the clinical characteristics and treatment of type II GBP are not well understood and management of GBP remains controversial. Type II GBP with gastric outlet obstruction is rare and prone to misdiagnosis and delayed treatment. Recent systematic reviews report that percutaneous drainage does not influence outcomes. In this current case, due to the high risk of bleeding and accidental injury, as well as a lack of access to safely visualize the Calot's triangle, the patient could not undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy, which would have been the ideal option. This current case report presents the use of percutaneous laparoscopic drainage combined with percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in a patient with type II GBP associated with gastric outlet obstruction. A review of the relevant literature has been provided in addition to a summary of the clinical manifestations and treatments for type II GBP.

An Unusual Abscess Associated with Gallbladder Perforation Successfully Treated with Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage and Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Abscess Drainage.

Abscesses associated with gallbladder perforation are often confined to the peri-gallbladder region. We herein report a rare case of gallbladder perforation in which the abscess cavity extended into the left upper quadrant. A 79-year-old woman developed gallbladder perforation secondary to acalculous cholecystitis. Computed tomography revealed fluid collection extending from the peri-gallbladder to the dorsal left hepatic lobe in contact with the stomach. We successfully treated percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage and simultaneous endoscopic ultrasound-guided transgastric internal and external abscess drainage. This minimally invasive approach is considered safe and feasible for managing such a rare case.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy assisted by combined intravenous and intracholecystic fluorescent cholangiography: a case report.

This case report describes a laparoscopic approach using fluorescence imaging guidance to treat gangrenous cholecystitis with perforation (GCP). A male patient in his early 60s presented with 3 days of right upper abdominal pain. Computed tomography and ultrasonography findings were consistent with a stone incarcerated in the gallbladder neck, GCP, and localized peritonitis. Percutaneous gallbladder drainage was initially performed, followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy 7 days later, using combined intravenous and intracholecystic fluorescent cholangiography. This technique allowed visualization of the cystic and common bile ducts during surgery and enabled safe removal of the diseased gallbladder. The patient recovered well without complications, and reported no pain or discomfort at a 2-month follow-up.

Large biloma as the initial presentation of gallbladder perforation: a case report and literature review.

Biloma is an encapsulated intra or extra-hepatic collection of bile after biliary tree trauma. Post-procedural and traumatic biliary damage are the most common etiologic causes. Gallbladder perforation due to acute cholecystitis rarely presents with biloma occurrence. We present a case of large extrahepatic biloma formation as a consequence of a perforated gallbladder.

A retrospective study of diagnosis and management of gallbladder perforation: 10-year experience from a tertiary health care centre.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to perform retrospective analysis of data collected from patients of gallbladder perforations for diagnosis, management and outcome. Material and Methods: A retrospective analysis of data was carried out for 40 patients of gallbladder perforations from the hospital record of patients who were diagnosed preoperatively and intraoperatively as a case of gallbladder perforation over a period of 10 years and were managed in our surgery unit of a tertiary health care centre. Patients were included irrespective of sex except cases of trauma and patients of the paediatric age group. Results: Among 40 patients, 26 were females and 14 were males. As per Anderson modification of Neimeier classification, 13 (32.5%) had type 1, 23 (57.5%) had type 2, and four (10%) patients had type 3 perforations and none of the patients had type 4 perforation. Twenty-three patients (57.5%) were found to have fundal perforation, followed by body in 11 patients (27.5%), three (7.5%) in Hartman's pouch while in three patients (7.5%), there were multiple perforations. All patients of type 1 Neimer classification were diagnosed clinically as cases of biliary peritonitis, whereas most cases of type 2 Neimer classification were diagnosed preoperatively by CECT abdomen 12/23 patients (52%) and ultrasound abdomen 10/23 (43.47%). All patients underwent surgery, and there were three mortalities. Conclusion: In our study, there was female predominance in patients having gallbladder perforation. Of the patients, 52.5% were diabetic and mean age was 55.9 years. CECT abdomen was the most useful modality for diagnosis of type 2 gallbladder perforations. Timely surgical intervention is mandatory for a better outcome of these cases.

Metastatic Colon Cancer Presenting as Gallbladder Perforation: Highlighting the Diagnostic Challenges and Clinical Implications.

Gallbladder perforation is an uncommon occurrence that demands prompt surgical intervention, typically observed in the context of acute cholecystitis. In this article, we present an extraordinary case of gallbladder gangrene and perforation, originating from metastasis of colon cancer. The patient's presentation included an incidental discovery of colon cancer, which was indicated by histopathology of the gall bladder. This case report aims to shed light on the intricate relationship between gallbladder pathology and metastatic colon cancer, emphasizing the need for vigilant evaluation and comprehensive management strategies.

Spontaneous gallbladder perforation in a man with gallstone disease without known anamnesis of cholecystitis: Case report.

INTRODUCTION: Spontaneous gallbladder perforation is a rare complication of gallstone disease. It causes acute peritonitis with potentially fatal outcome. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of spontaneous gallbladder perforation with challenging diagnosis. DISCUSSION: The diagnosis of gallbladder perforation should be considered in elderly patients presenting to the surgical emergency department with symptoms and signs of peritonitis even in the absence of pre-existing gallbladder disease. Spontaneous gallbladder perforation is a rare and potentially fatal diagnosis. In most reported cases, perforation occurred due to predisposing factors like acute cholecystitis, trauma or obstruction. In spite of rarity, spontaneous gallbladder perforation should be considered as differential diagnosis on examination of patients with sudden abdominal pain especially in cases of known cholecystolithiasis. Our patient had type 1 perforation according to Niemeier classification, the type associated with the highest mortality rate. The type of perforations has been reported as being difficult to recognize preoperatively, as with our patient with two inconclusive CT scans. This was due to the absence of classical symptoms of gallbladder perforation. CT is the modality of choice when gallbladder perforation is suspected. CONCLUSION: We believe the reason for the spontaneous gallbladder perforation in the presented case was the presence of cholecystolithiasis. We acknowledge the importance of considering this diagnosis also in patients without previous signs of cholecystitis.

Gallbladder Perforation with Choledochogastric Fistula Due to Ascaris Infestation, a Case Report.

We present a case of a 35-year-old Ethiopian female patient presented with right upper quadrant abdominal pain. Studies suspected gallbladder disease, for which she operated. Intraoperatively, gallbladder perforation with choledochogastric fistula was identified, with Ascaris lumbricoides (AL) worm in the common bile duct. Cholecystectomy was performed; common bile was repaired with T-tube and gastric repair. Patient was discharged 11 days after. On subsequent follow-up at the surgical referral clinic, the patient had no complaints.

Gallbladder perforation with fistulous communication.

BACKGROUND: The management of gallbladder perforation (GBP) with fistulous communication (Neimeier type I) is controversial. AIM: To recommend management options for GBP with fistulous communication. METHODS: A systematic review of studies describing the management of Neimeier type I GBP was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The search strategy was conducted in Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and EMBASE (May 2022). Data extraction was obtained for patient characteristics, type of intervention, days of hospitalization (DoH), complications, and site of fistulous communication. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients (61% female) from case reports, series, and cohorts were included. The most frequent fistulous communication occurred in the abdominal wall. Patients from case reports/series had a similar proportion of complications between open cholecystectomy (OC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) (28.6 vs 12.5; P = 0.569). Mortality was higher in OC (14.3 vs 0.0; P = 0.467) but this proportion was given by only one patient. DoH were higher in OC (mean 26.3 d vs 6.6 d). There was no clear association between higher rates of complications of a given intervention in cohorts, and no mortality was observed. CONCLUSION: Surgeons must evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the therapeutic options. OC and LC are adequate options for the surgical management of GBP, with no significant differences.

Application of laparoscopic surgery in gallbladder carcinoma.

Gallbladder carcinoma (GC) is a rare type of cancer of the digestive system, with an incidence that varies by region. Surgery plays a primary role in the comprehensive treatment of GC and is the only known cure. Compared with traditional open surgery, laparoscopic surgery has the advantages of convenient operation and magnified field of view. Laparoscopic surgery has been successful in many fields, including gastrointestinal medicine and gynecology. The gallbladder was one of the first organs to be treated by laparoscopic surgery, and laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the gold standard surgical treatment for benign gallbladder diseases. However, the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for patients with GC remain controversial. Over the past several decades, research has focused on laparoscopic surgery for GC. The disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery include a high incidence of gallbladder perforation, possible port site metastasis, and potential tumor seeding. The advantages of laparoscopic surgery include less intraoperative blood loss, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and fewer complications. Nevertheless, studies have provided contrasting conclusions over time. In general, recent research has tended to support laparoscopic surgery. However, the application of laparoscopic surgery in GC is still in the exploratory stage. Here, we provide an overview of previous studies, with the aim of introducing the application of laparoscopy in GC.

Gallbladder perforation following peroral cholangioscopy-guided lithotripsy: A case report.

Peroral cholangioscopy-guided lithotripsy is highly effective in clearing difficult bile duct stones. It can cause adverse events, such as cholangitis and pancreatitis; however, gallbladder perforation is extremely rare. Herein, we describe the case of a 77-year-old woman who developed gallbladder perforation following peroral cholangioscopy -guided lithotripsy. She was referred to our hospital to treat multiple large bile duct stones. She underwent peroral cholangioscopy-guided lithotripsy because of conventional lithotripsy failure. After a cholangioscope was advanced into the bile duct, saline irrigation was used for visualization. Electronic hydraulic lithotripsy was performed, but it took time for fragmentation because the calculus was hard. The 2-h endoscopic procedure did not completely remove the stone, and treatment was discontinued after placing a biliary plastic stent and nasobiliary tube. After the endoscopic procedure, she started experiencing right hypochondrial pain, which worsened the next day. Computed tomography showed a gallbladder wall defect in the gallbladder fundus with pericholecystic fluid. She was diagnosed with gallbladder perforation and underwent emergency surgery. A perforation site was found at the gallbladder fundus. Open cholecystectomy, choledochotomy, and extraction of residual bile duct stones were performed. The patient was discharged 9 days post-surgery without any complications. The saline irrigation used for visualization may have caused a surge in intra-gallbladder pressure, resulting in gallbladder perforation. Therefore, endoscopists may need to conserve irrigation water during peroral cholangioscopy-guided lithotripsy.

Effectiveness of no drainage after elective day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy, even with intraoperative gallbladder perforation: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been carried out as day-case surgery. Current guidelines do not mention the role of drainage after LC. In particular, data stay blank with no prospective study on drainage management when gallbladder perforation (GP) accidentally occurs intraoperatively. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare clinical outcomes of drainage and no drainage after elective day-case LC. Intraoperative GP was recorded. The primary and secondary outcomes were major and minor complications, respectively. RESULTS: Two hundred patients were randomized. No major complications occurred in either group. In secondary outcomes, nausea/vomiting, pain, hospital stay, and cost were similar in the drainage group and no drainage group; postoperative fever, WBC, and CRP levels were significantly lower in the no drainage group. GP occurred in 32 patients. Male patients with higher BMI and CRP and abdominal pain within 1 month were more likely to occur GP. Subgroup analysis of GP, primary outcomes, and most secondary outcomes had no difference. Postoperative WBC and CRP were higher in the drainage group. Postoperative fever occurred in 63 patients. Univariate analysis of fever showed that blood loss, drainage, postoperative WBC, CRP, and hospital stay were significant. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that drainage was an independent risk factor for fever after LC (OR 3.418, 95% CI 1.392-8.390; p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: No drainage after elective day-case LC is safe and associated with fewer complications, even in intraoperative GP. The trial proves that drainage is an independent risk factor for postoperative fever. The use of a drain after LC may lead to an unsuccessful day-case procedure by causing fever, elevated CRP, and extended hospital stay (NCT03909360).

Cholecysto-hepatic fistula in type III gallbladder perforation: A rare etiology of liver abscess; case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Gallbladder perforation (GBP) with cholecystohepatic fistula is an extremely rare complication of acute and/or chronic gallbladder diseases. Niemeier classified GBP into three types each characterized by specific signs and symptoms. Radiological investigations such as abdominal ultrasonography (USG) and computed tomography (CT) are crucial to evaluate and diagnosing GBP, while fistulae are usually identified intraoperatively. CASE PRESENTATION: A 77-year-old female patient, with a background medical history of multiple comorbidities, presented to our hospital with a one-week history of abdominal pain. Laboratory investigations showed abnormal values. The abdominal CT scan revealed a mildly enlarged liver, distended gallbladder, and liver abscess. Then, ultrasound-guided aspiration was done, and the clinical picture was consistent with calcular cholecystitis complicated with liver abscess. So, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was decided and the intraoperatively detected fistula was excised. The resected perforated gallbladder was sent for histopathological studies. The postoperative period was uneventful. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: GBP is an unusual entity that is categorized into three types. It is considered a gallbladder complication and surgical emergency. The clinical features of GBP are non-specific and radiological tools aid in diagnosis demonstration. In the presented case of type III GBP, cholecystohepatic fistula was detected and excised intraoperatively. CONCLUSION: Due to the rare entity of type III GBP in association with liver abscess, we report the case of a 77-year-old female with right lower quadrant pain, found to be caused by type III GBP with cholecystohepatic fistula and liver abscess.

Gallbladder perforation: A rare case report.

INTRODUCTION: Gallbladder perforation (GBP) is a rare but severe, often fatal, disease due to its delayed pathology, demanding urgent surgical intervention. GBP can result from acute cholecystitis in 6-12 % of cases. It manifests in a variety of presentations. The diagnosis is frequently postponed or missed. CASE PRESENTATION: A 68-year-old woman came to the emergency department with the chief complaint of abdominal pain for 1 week. The pain began in the epigastric region and right upper abdominal quadrant, then extended to the whole abdomen. Abdominal bowel sounds were decreased, with muscular defense and tenderness throughout the abdomen. On rectal touch examination, the sphincter was loose. Laboratory tests found leukocytosis and hyperglycemia. An abdominal ultrasound examination showed cholelithiasis, sludge, and little echo fluid in the lower right abdomen. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: The patient was diagnosed with generalized peritonitis and cholelithiasis with sepsis (qSOFA score 2; SOFA score 2). An emergency exploratory laparotomy was performed. We found gallbladder (GB) dilatation with fibrin surrounding the GB wall and a perforation in the border of the GB neck and cystic duct of around 10 mm in diameter. We performed cholecystectomy in the distal region of perforation. Antibiotics and analgesics were used. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 5. After 4 weeks, she was followed up and doing well with no complaints. CONCLUSION: Early diagnosis and treatment are essential for GBP to prevent morbidity and mortality. Initial management is required; in patients with acute abdominal pain, the surgeon should suspect the cause may be GBP.

Clinical experience in laparoscopic treatment of gallbladder perforation.

Aim: We herein present our clinical experience in laparoscopic surgery for gallbladder perforation (GBP). Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 44 patients who diagnosed with GBP from January 2015 to November 2020. Results: The mean age of the 44 patients was 64.0 years and the female-to-male ratio was 20:24. The most common type of GBP was Type II, followed by Type I and Type III (31:9:4). 72.7% of the patients were diagnosed with GBP at the time of surgery. Laparoscopic surgery was performed for 38 (86.4%) patients, with a conversion rate of 13.2%. The mean length of hospital stays was 7.8 days. The mortality and morbidity rates were 2.3% and 11.4%, respectively. Conclusions: Pre-operative diagnosis of GBP is difficult. Laparoscopic surgery is safe, feasible and effective for patients with GBP.

Risk factors and outcomes in acute perforated gallbladder: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Acute gallbladder perforation is a rare complication of biliary diseases with an estimated incidence of 2% of all gallbladder diseases. It carries a higher risk of morbidity and mortality. This study examines the risk factors and outcome of patients admitted with acute and subacute gallbladder perforation (AGBP) to a tertiary hospital in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed including all patients with biliary diseases who were operated on from Jan. 2016 until Dec. 2020. The patients were divided: the first group included patients with AGBP and the second group included patients with other biliary diagnoses. We excluded patients with chronic perforation, traumatic or malignant perforation. RESULTS: A total of 587 patients were eligible for this study. The incidence of AGBP was 2.7% and its morbidity was 6.3% with no mortality reported. AGBP was significantly associated with male gender, older age, in patients with two or more associated comorbidities; diabetes mellitus, hypertension and dyslipidemia. Ultrasonography was not diagnostic while AGBP was confirmed by computed tomography in 42.9%. AGBP was associated with a significant higher risk of conversion to open cholecystectomy and partial or subtotal cholecystectomy. The multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that the length of hospital stays increased by 70% in patients with AGBP. CONCLUSION: Acute perforated gallbladder is predominant in elderly male patients with multiple comorbidities, especially diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. CT has a higher sensitivity to detect or suspect AGBP. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe management approach.